mean-variance criterion 1 iinefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

36
Mean-variance Criterion 1 Inefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Upload: loreen-monica-maxwell

Post on 31-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Mean-variance Criterion1

Inefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Page 2: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Investment Opportunity Set:The n-Asset Case

2

An efficient portfolio is one that has the highest expected returns for a given level of risk.

The efficient frontier is the frontier formed by the set of efficient portfolios.

All other portfolios, which lie outside the efficient frontier, are inefficient portfolios.

Page 3: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Efficient Portfolios of risky securities

3

An efficient portfolio is one that has the highest expected returns for a given level of risk. The efficient frontier is the frontier formed by the set of efficient portfolios. All other portfolios, which lie outside the efficient frontier, are inefficient portfolios.

Page 4: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

PORTFOLIO RISK: THE n-ASSET CASE

4

The calculation of risk becomes quite involved when a large number of assets or securities are combined to form a portfolio.

Page 5: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

N-Asset Portfolio Risk Matrix

5

Page 6: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

6

Page 7: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

RISK DIVERSIFICATION:SYSTEMATIC AND UNSYSTEMATIC RISK

7

When more and more securities are included in a portfolio, the risk of individual securities in the portfolio is reduced.

This risk totally vanishes when the number of securities is very large.

But the risk represented by covariance remains. Risk has two parts:

1. Diversifiable (unsystematic)

2. Non-diversifiable (systematic)

Page 8: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Systematic Risk8

Systematic risk arises on account of the economy-wide uncertainties and the tendency of individual securities to move together with changes in the market.

This part of risk cannot be reduced through diversification.

It is also known as market risk. Investors are exposed to market risk even when

they hold well-diversified portfolios of securities.

Page 9: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Examples of Systematic Risk

9

Page 10: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Unsystematic Risk10

Unsystematic risk arises from the unique uncertainties of individual securities.

It is also called unique risk. These uncertainties are diversifiable if a large

numbers of securities are combined to form well-diversified portfolios.

Uncertainties of individual securities in a portfolio cancel out each other.

Unsystematic risk can be totally reduced through diversification.

Page 11: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Examples of Unsystematic Risk

11

Page 12: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Total Risk12

Page 13: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Systematic and unsystematic risk andnumber of securities

13

Page 14: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

COMBINING A RISK-FREE ASSET ANDA RISKY ASSET

14

Page 15: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

A Risk-Free Asset and A Risky Asset: Example

RISK-RETURN ANALYSIS FOR A PORTFOLIO OF A RISKY AND A RISK-FREE SECURITIES

Weights (%) Expected Return, Rp Standard Deviation (p)

Risky security Risk-free security (%) (%)

120 – 20 17 7.2 100 0 15 6.0 80 20 13 4.8 60 40 11 3.6 40 60 9 2.4 20 80 7 1.2 0 100 5 0.0

0

2.5

5

7.5

10

12.5

15

17.5

20

0 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.2 9

Standard Deviation

Expecte

d R

etu

rn

A

B

C

D

Rf, risk-free rate

Page 16: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Borrowing and Lending16

Risk-return relationship for portfolio of risky and risk-free securities

Page 17: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

MULTIPLE RISKY ASSETS ANDA RISK-FREE ASSET

17

In a market situation, a large number of investors holding portfolios consisting of a risk-free security and multiple risky securities participate.

Page 18: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

18

We draw three lines from the risk-free rate (5%) to the three portfolios. Each line shows the manner in which capital is allocated. This line is called the capital allocation line.

Portfolio M is the optimum risky portfolio, which can be combined with the risk-free asset.

Risk-return relationship for portfolio of riskyand risk-free securities

Page 19: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

19

The capital market line (CML) is an efficient set of risk-free and risky securities, and it shows the risk-return trade-off in the market equilibrium.

The capital market line

Page 20: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Separation Theory20

According to the separation theory, the choice of portfolio involves two separate steps.

The first step involves the determination of the optimum risky portfolio.

The second step concerns with the investor’s decision to form portfolio of the risk-free asset and the optimum risky portfolio depending on her risk preferences.

Page 21: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Slope of CML21

Page 22: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM)

22

The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a model that provides a framework to determine the required rate of return on an asset and indicates the relationship between return and risk of the asset.

The required rate of return specified by CAPM helps in valuing an asset.

One can also compare the expected (estimated) rate of return on an asset with its required rate of return and determine whether the asset is fairly valued.

Under CAPM, the security market line (SML) exemplifies the relationship between an asset’s risk and its required rate of return.

Page 23: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Assumptions of CAPM23

Market efficiency

Risk aversion and mean-variance optimization

Homogeneous expectations

Single time period

Risk-free rate

Page 24: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Characteristics Line24

Page 25: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Security Market Line (SML)

25

Security market line

Page 26: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

26

Security market line with normalize systematic risk

Page 27: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

IMPLICATIONS AND RELEVANCE OF CAPM

27

Page 28: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Implications28

Investors will always combine a risk-free asset with a market portfolio of risky assets. They will invest in risky assets in proportion to their market value.

Investors will be compensated only for that risk which they cannot diversify.

Investors can expect returns from their investment according to the risk.

Page 29: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Limitations29

It is based on unrealistic assumptions. It is difficult to test the validity of CAPM. Betas do not remain stable over time.

Page 30: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

THE ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY (APT)

30

The act of taking advantage of a price differential between two or more markets is referred to as arbitrage.

The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) describes the method of bring a mispriced asset in line with its expected price.

An asset is considered mispriced if its current price is different from the predicted price as per the model.

The fundamental logic of APT is that investors always indulge in arbitrage whenever they find differences in the returns of assets with similar risk characteristics.

Page 31: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Concept of Return under APT

31

Page 32: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Concept of Risk under APT

32

Page 33: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Steps in CalculatingExpected Return under APT

33

searching for the factors that affect the asset’s return estimation of factor beta

Page 34: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Factors34

Industrial production

Changes in default

premium

Changes in the structure of

interest rates

Inflation rate

Changes in the real rate

of return

Page 35: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Risk premium35

Conceptually, it is the compensation, over and above, the risk-free rate of return that investors require for the risk contributed by the factor.

One could use past data on the forecasted and actual values to determine the premium.

Page 36: Mean-variance Criterion 1 IInefficient portfolios- have lower return and higher risk

Factor beta36

The beta of the factor is the sensitivity of the asset’s return to the changes in the factor.

One can use regression approach to calculate the factor beta.