meador=usaf csar
TRANSCRIPT
THIS BRIEFING ISUNCLASSIFIED
USAF COMBAT SEARCH ANDRESCUE (CSAR)
COL LEE MEADORACC / DRMR
OVERVIEW
l CSAR Weapon Systemsl CSAR Commitmentsl Rescue Force Structurel CAF Modernizationl Analysis of Alternatives
CSAR WEAPON SYSTEMS
HH-60G
HC/MC-130
Pararescuemen (PJ)
CSAR COMMITMENTS
l Operations NORTHERN WATCH (ONW) andSOUTHERN WATCH (OSW)
l ACC fills 80% of on-going CSAR recoveryplatform commitments– 10% AFRC/ANG; 10% AFSOC
l CAF CSAR is a High Demand / Low Density(HDLD) Asset
CSAR COMMITMENTS
l OPERATION ALLIED FORCE– Two rescues performed by AFSOC– Pickups accomplished by MH-60G
– AFSOC no longer has MH-60Gs– CAF continued to maintain CSAR alert in ONW & OSW– CSAR became an AFSOC, ACC, AFRC
combined effort mid-way through Allied Forcel AFSOC is Phasing out their MH-53
TOTAL ACTIVE / RES / ANGHH-60: 72 (36 / 21 / 15)HC-130: 31 (11 / 9 / 11)210 RQS
KULIS3 HC-1305 HH-60
129 RQS4 HC/MC-1305 HH-60
102 RQS4 HC-1305 HH-60
56 RQSKEFLAVIK4 HH-60
303 RQS4 HC-130304 RQS8 HH-60
ANG units Active units AFRC units AETC/USAFWS/TES units
FORCE STRUCTURE
305 RQS5 HH-60
39 RQS5 HC-130301 RQS8 HH-60
66 RQS10 HH-60
41 RQS14 HH-60
71 RQS11 HC-130
58 SOW9 HH-604 HC-130
USAFWS2 HH-60422 TES1 HH-60
33 RQSKADENA8 HH-60
FORCE STRUCTURE
l ACC Focus has been on fixing force structurel Bought H-60s from AFSOC; WC-130s from AFRCl On going: AFRC mission swap
– 939th Rescue Wing, Portland, OR, converts toan air-refueling wing 4QT FY02
– CSAR assets (8 HH-60, 5 HC-130) are an activeforce-structure gain to ACC
CAF MODERNIZATION
l Self Protection System (SPS)l Block 152 Upgrade & 486 NAV System CDU upgradel 701 engine retrofitl HAVECSAR - HH-60 RTIC, T1 Mod, 3 deployed to
ONW, 3 will be deployed to OSWl SLEP funding for 20 older HH-60s (10 Now Funded)l 241 Radar Upgrades – HC-130l Analysis Of Alternatives - replacement HH-60
HH-60 SERVICE LIFE
l The HH-60G is approaching its service life limitsl These charts depict force structure for the next 25 years
No Extension
100
Active
AFRC
ANG
Trainers
Spares
Attrition Reserve
0
50
98 02 06 10 14 18 22 26
20 A/C Extended
0
100
98 02 06 10 14 18 22
50
26
Active
AFRC
ANG
Trainers
Spares
Attrition Reserve
0
100
98 02 06 10 14 18 22
50
26
Active
AFRC
ANG
Trainers
Spares
Attrition Reserve
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES(AoA)
l Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) - $1.5M/18 Month Effortl IOC - FY 2007l AoA force level analysis should take Peacetime CSAR
operations into account– It may have the largest impact on force structure– Space shuttle support should not be considered a
required capability (JROCM 005-99)
AoA OBJECTIVES
l Identify best Combat Rescue concept (2010-2030)l Update required mission capabilitiesl Document mission area deficienciesl Examine nonmaterial and systems solutionsl Identify and baseline most cost effective solution(s)l Set size and distribution of next generation force
AoA REQUIRED CAPABILITY
l High service lifel Low threat susceptibilityl Tactical adverse-weather penetrationl High combat radiusl Improved situation awarenessl High payload spacel Low reaction time
AoA INITIAL OPTIONS
l HH-60G SLEP / Upgradel Commercial Optionsl Currently Fielded Systemsl Systems Being Fieldedl Mixed Fleet Optionsl Allied Cooperative Developmentl New Program Development
BASELINE / SLEP/ NEW LIGHTHELICOPTER
Sikorsky: HH-60 Pave HawkUpgrade
S-92 WideChord Blade
S-92 Tail Rotor
S-92 Dynamic System
75 Gallon External
Fuel Tanks
AdvancedIR Suppressor
RedesignedAerial RefuelProbe
Terrain FollowingTerrain Avoidance
Radar
Active Vibration Control
440 GallonSingle CellMain Fuel
Cell
20 InchLonger Cabin
16 InchLonger Tailcone
SIRFCSIIRCM
CEPEngines
Max GrossWeight Increase
H-60 Airframe SLEP
Bird strikecertifiedtail rotor
Fatigue tolerantdesign dynamic
components
Infinite life yoketype rotor head
Compositeblades
Metal primarystructureairframe
Redundantcockpit flightcontrol path
mechanical flightcontrols
EFIScockpit
Tricyclelanding
gear
Sponsonfuel
Seating for22 troops
Forward cabinentrance door
CT7-8engines (2)
Rear ramp
COMMERCIAL OPTIONSSIKORSKY S-92 / BA-109 / MI-8
CURRENTLY FIELDEDSYSTEMS
l HH-60Jl MH-60K
l H-53
l MH-47
SYSTEMS BEING FIELDED
l CH-60l UH-60X
l UH-1Y
l MV/CV-22
MIXED FLEET
Find best mix of cost and effectiveness
ALLIED COOPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT
l Cougar
l EH-101
l NH-90
NEW DEVELOPMENT
Dupont Aerospace: DP-2Turbofan VTOL
Piasecki: VTDP/H-60
Sikorsky: HV-X Medium Lift
STATUS OF AoA – DEC 00
l Studies completed– Historical Operational Review– Rescue / Tanker Demand– Terminal Area / Payload Analysis– Force Structure– Possible Acquisition Strategies– Costs Analysis
STATUS OF AoA
l Ongoing– Modeling and Simulation
– Survivability / Vulnerability– Excursions
– Cost– Force Structure– Mixed Fleet– M&S Scenarios
l Will determine best optionl Decision by Mar 01
SUMMARY
l CAF CSAR forces (including AFRC, ANG) will beprimary recovery assets in the future– Best trained and prepared– We are applying Allied Force lessons learned– In the middle of major force expansion
and modernization– AoA exploring options for the future growth
NATIONAL SYSTEMS(collection)
PROCESSINGLOCATION
GPS
TDDS
HH-60
HOOK-112 Radiol Survivor location displayed on HH-60 CDUl Threat information displayed on HH-60 CDUl Near real-time data using National assets
AWACS w/TacticalReceiver
FLTSAT/ UHF (broadcast)
THREATS
Data Voice
CAOC
TADIL-A to CAOC
PLS Interrogation
ONW HAVE CSARARCHITECTURE
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES TIMELINE OF EVENTS
Sep 97: WR-ALC IDs service life problemOct 97: ACC convenes RDT: Drafts MNSOct 98: AFROC Validation / CSAF ApprovalJan 99: JROC Validation / VCJCS GuidanceMay 99: MS 0 DAB / USD/A&T ADM+GuidanceJul 99: ACC convenes AoA study teamAug 99: USAF/XOR issues PMDMar 01: Complete AoAApr 01: Brief Results to AFROCOct 01: JROC / DAB ?
AoA UPCOMING EVENTS
l Mar 01 – Complete Analysisl Mar 01 – ORD Developmentl Apr 01 – Present results to AFROCl Apr 01 – Oct 01 – Complete Milestone B Deliverablesl OCT 01 – JROC / DAB ???
– Dependent on status of program funding
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES(AoA)
l The HH-60G is quickly approaching its service life limitsl USAF CSAR replacement AoA is a $1.5m/18 month effortl AoA objectives
– Identify best combat rescue concept (2010-2030)– Update required mission capabilities– Document mission area deficiencies– Examine nonmaterial and systems solutions– Identify and baseline most cost effective solution(s)– Set size and distribution of next generation force
l Decision by Mar 01