mckinsey howsocialtechnologiesareextendingtheorganization24-11-11-111124062739-phpapp02
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Social media has diverse role NEW YORK: Brand owners around the world are adopting a wide range of social media technologies but only a small number can claim to be "fully networked", according to a study by McKinsey. The consultancy polled 4,261 executives globally, and discovered that 50% of the firms represented now have an official presence on the networks, up from 40% in 2010. Official blogs logged 41% in terms of uptake, ahead of video-sharing sites like YouTube on 38% and microblogging platforms, including Twitter, on 23%, all of which recorded growth year on year. Adoption rates proved strongest in the high tech and telecoms sector on 86%, with business services on 77%, pharma companies on 74% and retailers on 69%, according to the study. When discussing the in-house benefits of deploying such tools, 74% of contributors agreed it was quicker to access knowledge, 58% cited lower communications costs and 51% suggested it was easier to tap internal experts. Focusing on client-facing activities, 69% of the sample pointed to greater marketing effectiveness, 47% reported higher customer satisfaction and 43% said that marketing spend was lower as a result. Currently, 78% of companies are still "developing" when it comes to deriving an advantage from their social activities, 12% are enjoying meaningful improvements on client-based metrics and 7% have mainly seen in-house benefits. A modest 3% of operators were considered to be "fully networked", or exploiting the complete range of favourable outcomes following on from leveraging social properties. McKinsey also revealed there were "statistically significant correlations" between self-reported corporate performance and implementing two core business practices in this area. The first was using these mediums to "scan the external environment", pursued by 75% of firms on at least one platform, peaking at 40% for social networks, 29% for blogs and 13% for microblogs. But the second such discipline, "matching staff to set tasks", was much less widespread on 29%. Other common uses of social sites were finding new ideas on 73%, and managing projects on 55%. Looking ahead five years, 35% of the panel said boundaries between employees and customers would blur, 32% thought data will become more important to decision-making, and 27% predicted organisational structures could flatten out. Data sourced from McKinsey; additional content by Warc staff, 24 November 2011
How social technologies are extending the organization Our fifth annual survey on the way organizations use social tools and technologies finds
that they continue to seep into many organizations, transforming business processes and
raising performance. NOVEMBER 2011 • Jacques Bughin, Angela Hung Byers, and Michael Chui
Source: McKinsey Global Institute
In This Article
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Usage at scale and continued benefits
o Exhibit 1: Rising adoption rates
o Exhibit 2: Adoption of social technologies across industries
o Exhibit 3: Benefits remain consistent over time
Page 3: The performance edge of networked enterprises
o Exhibit 4: Tracking the four types of organizations
o Exhibit 5: Correlations with corporate performance
Page 4: Networked organizations: Not a steady state
o Exhibit 6: Shifting network classifications
Page 5: Changing processes
o Exhibit 7: Supporting a variety of processes
o Exhibit 8: A mix of old and new
o Exhibit 9: A blurring of boundaries
About the authors
Comments
Companies are improving their mastery of social technologies, using them to enhance
operations and exploit new market opportunities—key findings of our fifth annual survey on these
tools and technologies, in which we asked more than 4,200 global executives how organizations
deploy them and the benefits they confer.1 When adopted at scale across an emerging type of
networked enterprise and integrated into the work processes of employees, social technologies
can boost a company’s financial performance and market share, respondents say, confirming last
year’s survey results.
But this is a very dynamic environment, where the gains from using social technologies
sometimes do not persist, perhaps because it takes so much effort to achieve them at scale. Some
companies, respondents indicate, reaped fewer benefits and thus became less networked, while a
smaller percentage learned how to deploy these technologies to become even more networked.
Executives say that their companies are using them to increase their agility and to manage
organizational complexity. Many believe that if organizational barriers to the use of social
technologies diminish, they could form the core of entirely new business processes that may
radically improve performance.
Notes 1 The online survey included 4,261 respondents across sectors, geographies, company sizes, tenures, and functional specialties. As with
surveys in past years (when we referred to social technologies as “Web 2.0”) the survey covers the adoption and usage of technologies, their
benefits, and corporate performance. This year, we also asked about how organizations are using social technologies and the types and
magnitude of the organizational and process changes that could result.
Usage at scale and continued benefits
Social technologies as a group have reached critical scale at the organizations represented in our
survey. Seventy-two percent of the respondents report that their companies are deploying at least
one technology, and more than 40 percent say that social networking and blogs are now in use
(Exhibit 1). These technologies are being deployed across sectors, at the high level of 86 percent of
the respondents’ companies in high tech and telecommunications, but at 62 percent of companies
even in the energy industry (Exhibit 2). Levels of reported benefits not only remain high when
respondents’ organizations use social tools for internal purposes but have also increased among
those that use them for communicating with customers or for integration with partners and
suppliers (Exhibit 3).
The performance edge of networked enterprises
Last year, we identified a small group of respondents who indicated that their companies had
experienced superior performance from the use of social technologies across key stakeholder
groups. We repeated the analysis this year, looking at the average level of improvements in
business benefits that executives reported. Four clusters emerge from our analysis. Executives at
internally networked organizations note the highest improvement in benefits from interactions
with employees; those at externally networked organizations, from interactions with customers,
partners, and suppliers. Executives at fully networked organizations report greater benefits
fromboth internal and external interactions. In the fourth and by far the largest group, developing
organizations, respondents report lower-than-average improvements across all interactions at
their organizations.2
As we found last year, the number of fully networked organizations is small. But the percentage of
externally networked organizations is higher and that of internally networked ones lower (Exhibit
4),3 reflecting the fact that the gains from the use of social technologies are not static (see
discussion below). We call the companies in the fully and externally networked groups extended
enterprises, since their use of social technologies in customer and partner outreach blurs the
boundaries of the organization.
We found statistically significant correlations between self-reported corporate-performance
metrics and certain business processes that networked enterprises use (Exhibit 5). The market
share gains respondents report are correlated with two such processes. First, these organizations
use social tools to scan external environments. Second, they use them to match employees to
tasks: internal wikis and social networks help project leaders to identify employees with the most
appropriate skills and to assign these employees to the projects for which they are best suited.
Another key performance measure, self-reported operating-margin improvements, correlated
positively with the reported percentage of employees whose use of social technologies was
integrated into their day-to-day work. Among the companies of respondents who took the survey
in previous years, these improvements also correlated positively with gains in the reported
percentage of employees whose work is highly integrated with social media. Market share
leadership in an industry, the final self-reported performance measure, correlated positively with
the integration of social tools in employees’ day-to-day work, as well. Consistent with last year’s
analysis, we found that market leadership correlates negatively with fully networked and
externally networked organizations. While market leaders may use social technologies within the
organization, they might be less inclined than market challengers to push for a full range of
benefits. Back to top
Notes 2 As we did last year, we sorted the respondents into four clusters based on the average mean improvement reported across the different
benefits when Web 2.0 is used in interacting with employees, customers, and external partners or any combination thereof. Fully networked
enterprises are defined as those with an average improvement greater than 10 percent when Web 2.0 is used to interact with employees,
customers, and external partners. Externally networked enterprises are those with a greater than 10 percent average improvement when Web
2.0 is used to interact with customers and external partners. Internally networked enterprises are those with an average improvement greater
than 10 percent when Web 2.0 is used to interact with employees. The remainder of respondents work for what we classify as developing
enterprises. 3 See Jacques Bughin and Michael Chui, “The rise of the networked enterprise: Web 2.0 finds its payday,” mckinseyquarterly.com, December
2010.
Networked organizations: Not a steady state
We also analyzed the responses of executives who participated in both the 2010 and 2011 surveys
for changes in our defined enterprise clusters. According to these responses, a surprising number
of organizations made the transition from one type of enterprise to another. Roughly half of the
internally and externally networked enterprises slid back into the category of developing
organizations; that is, they did not maintain the benefits of using social technologies that they had
achieved earlier. Less than 15 percent of the companies in any given category moved up to the
next tier—in other words, from a developing to a networked enterprise or from an internally or
externally networked enterprise to a fully networked one (Exhibit 6). It appears that it is easier to
lose the benefits of social technologies than to become a more networked enterprise, which
suggests that significant effort is required to achieve gains at scale. We also found initial
indications that if the percentage of employees who integrated social technologies into their day-
to-day work declined, their companies were more likely to backslide.
Changing processes
We asked respondents about current and future uses of social technologies for a range of business
processes and found that the greatest number say their companies use these tools to scan the
external environment for new ideas. Respondents also report that different technologies are
better suited to specific types of business processes, as the accompanying heat map shows
(Exhibit 7). Social networking and blogs, in particular, are used most heavily in externally focused
processes that gather competitive intelligence and support marketing efforts.
Respondents expect social technologies to modify many of their organizations’ current processes.
In addition, many believe that entirely new processes could arise if barriers to use—cultural
obstacles, for example—fall (Exhibit 8). The respondents affiliated with fully networked
organizations are the likeliest to believe that greater process change will occur in their own
organizations. In larger numbers than respondents in other clusters, they think that social
technologies will lead their companies to adopt entirely new processes under current conditions
and to do so even more aggressively if all constraints were removed. This optimistic view may
reflect the fact that these respondents are seeing the greatest level of benefits across the board.
Peering ahead three to five years, many respondents expect still more profound organizational
changes (Exhibit 9). They say that with fewer constraints on social technologies at their
companies, boundaries among employees, vendors, and customers will blur; that more employee
teams will be able to organize themselves; and that data-driven decision making will rise in
importance.
Looking ahead
Our research shows that respondents affiliated with fully networked organizations say that they continue to realize competitive gains and performance improvements. Senior executives should think strategically about how social technologies can support business processes by helping organizations to navigate the external environment and to forge stronger links with customers and vendors. Integrating social technologies into the workflow and using them to optimize internal processes will, these results suggest, provide additional competitive benefits.
Don’t rest on your laurels: competition will increase as the adoption of social tools and technologies continues to rise and as progressive companies use them to improve their processes. Indeed, many companies we categorized as networked organizations last year slipped to a lower rung this year as the benefits their executives reported fell. Integrating Web technologies into the daily workflow, our results suggest, is the most effective way to maintain competitive position or become more networked.
Companies should prepare for more substantial disruptions. Since many executives believe that significant changes will occur as (or if) constraints on social tools and technologies are lifted, companies that can create change themselves—instead of reacting to it—are likely to benefit the most.
About the Authors
Jacques Bughin is a director in McKinsey’s Brussels office; Michael Chui is a senior fellow of the McKinsey Global Institute and is based in
the San Francisco office.
The authors would like to thank Angela Hung Byers for her contribution to the development of this article.