mcgraw-hill/irwin modified for quan 6610 by dr. jim grayson optimization© the mcgraw-hill...
TRANSCRIPT
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.1McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Chapter 4 (Linear Programming: Formulation and Applications)
• Advertising-Mix Problem (Section 4.1) – Super Grain Corp | 4.2–4.5
• Resource Allocation Problems (Section 4.2)–Think-Big Capital Budgeting | 4.6–4.10
• Cost-Benefit-Trade-Off Problems (Section 4.3)–Union Airways | 4.11–4.15
• Distribution-Network Problems (Section 4.4)–Big M Co. | 4.16–4.20
• Student Exercises
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.2McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Super Grain Corp. Advertising-Mix Problem
• Goal: Design the promotional campaign for Crunchy Start.
• The three most effective advertising media for this product are– Television commercials on Saturday morning programs for children.
– Advertisements in food and family-oriented magazines.
– Advertisements in Sunday supplements of major newspapers.
• The limited resources in the problem are– Advertising budget ($4 million).
– Planning budget ($1 million).
– TV commercial spots available (5).
• The objective will be measured in terms of the expected number of exposures.
Question: At what level should they advertise Crunchy Start in each of the three media?
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.3McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Cost and Exposure Data
Costs
Cost CategoryEach
TV CommercialEach
Magazine AdEach
Sunday Ad
Ad Budget $300,000 $150,000 $100,000
Planning budget 90,000 30,000 40,000
Expected number of exposures
1,300,000 600,000 500,000
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.4McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Spreadsheet Formulation
3456789101112131415
B C D E F G HTV Spots Magazine Ads SS Ads
Exposures per Ad 1,300 600 500(thousands)
Budget BudgetCost per Ad ($thousands) Spent Available
Ad Budget 300 150 100 4,000 <= 4,000Planning Budget 90 30 40 1,000 <= 1,000
Total ExposuresTV Spots Magazine Ads SS Ads (thousands)
Number of Ads 0 20 10 17,000<=
Max TV Spots 5
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.5McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Algebraic Formulation
Let TV = Number of commercials for separate spots on televisionM = Number of advertisements in magazines.SS = Number of advertisements in Sunday supplements.
Maximize Exposure = 1,300TV + 600M + 500SSsubject to
Ad Spending: 300TV + 150M + 100SS ≤ 4,000 ($thousand)Planning Cost: 90TV + 30M + 30SS ≤ 1,000 ($thousand)Number of TV Spots: TV ≤ 5
andTV ≥ 0, M ≥ 0, SS ≥ 0.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.6McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Think-Big Capital Budgeting Problem
• Think-Big Development Co. is a major investor in commercial real-estate development projects.
• They are considering three large construction projects– Construct a high-rise office building.
– Construct a hotel.
– Construct a shopping center.
• Each project requires each partner to make four investments: a down payment now, and additional capital after one, two, and three years.
Question: At what fraction should Think-Big invest in each of the three projects?
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.7McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Financial Data for the Projects
Investment Capital Requirements
Year Office Building Hotel Shopping Center
0 $40 million $80 million $90 million
1 60 million 80 million 50 million
2 90 million 80 million 20 million
3 10 million 70 million 60 million
Net present value $45 million $70 million $50 million
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.8McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Spreadsheet Formulation
345678910111213141516
B C D E F G HOffice Shopping
Building Hotel CenterNet Present Value 45 70 50
($millions) Cumulative CumulativeCapital Capital
Cumulative Capital Required ($millions) Spent AvailableNow 40 80 90 25 <= 25
End of Year 1 100 160 140 44.757 <= 45End of Year 2 190 240 160 60.583 <= 65End of Year 3 200 310 220 80 <= 80
Office Shopping Total NPVBuilding Hotel Center ($millions)
Participation Share 0.00% 16.50% 13.11% 18.11
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.9McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Algebraic Formulation
Let OB = Participation share in the office building,H = Participation share in the hotel,SC = Participation share in the shopping center.
Maximize NPV = 45OB + 70H + 50SCsubject to
Total invested now: 40OB + 80H + 90SC ≤ 25 ($million)Total invested within 1 year: 100OB + 160H + 140SC ≤ 45 ($million)Total invested within 2 years: 190OB + 240H + 160SC ≤ 65 ($million)Total invested within 3 years: 200OB + 310H + 220SC ≤ 80 ($million)
andOB ≥ 0, H ≥ 0, SC ≥ 0.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.10McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Summary of Formulation Procedure for Resource-Allocation Problems
1. Identify the activities for the problem at hand.
2. Identify an appropriate overall measure of performance (commonly profit).
3. For each activity, estimate the contribution per unit of the activity to the overall measure of performance.
4. Identify the resources that must be allocated.
5. For each resource, identify the amount available and then the amount used per unit of each activity.
6. Enter the data in steps 3 and 5 into data cells.
7. Designate changing cells for displaying the decisions.
8. In the row for each resource, use SUMPRODUCT to calculate the total amount used. Enter ≤ and the amount available in two adjacent cells.
9. Designate a target cell. Use SUMPRODUCT to calculate this measure of performance.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.11McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Union Airways Personnel Scheduling
• Union Airways is adding more flights to and from its hub airport and so needs to hire additional customer service agents.
• The five authorized eight-hour shifts are– Shift 1: 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM
– Shift 2: 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM
– Shift 3: Noon to 8:00 PM
– Shift 4: 4:00 PM to midnight
– Shift 5: 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM
Question: How many agents should be assigned to each shift?
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.12McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Schedule Data
Time Periods Covered by Shift
Time Period 1 2 3 4 5
MinimumNumber of
Agents Needed
6 AM to 8 AM √ 48
8 AM to 10 AM √ √ 79
10 AM to noon √ √ 65
Noon to 2 PM √ √ √ 87
2 PM to 4 PM √ √ 64
4 PM to 6 PM √ √ 73
6 PM to 8 PM √ √ 82
8 PM to 10 PM √ 43
10 PM to midnight √ √ 52
Midnight to 6 AM √ 15
Daily cost per agent $170 $160 $175 $180 $195
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.13McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Spreadsheet Formulation
3456789101112131415161718192021
B C D E F G H I J6am-2pm 8am-4pm Noon-8pm 4pm-midnight 10pm-6am
Shift Shift Shift Shift ShiftCost per Shift $170 $160 $175 $180 $195
Total MinimumTime Period Shift Works Time Period? (1=yes, 0=no) Working Needed
6am-8am 1 0 0 0 0 48 >= 488am-10am 1 1 0 0 0 79 >= 79
10am- 12pm 1 1 0 0 0 79 >= 6512pm-2pm 1 1 1 0 0 118 >= 872pm-4pm 0 1 1 0 0 70 >= 644pm-6pm 0 0 1 1 0 82 >= 736pm-8pm 0 0 1 1 0 82 >= 82
8pm-10pm 0 0 0 1 0 43 >= 4310pm-12am 0 0 0 1 1 58 >= 52
12am-6am 0 0 0 0 1 15 >= 15
6am-2pm 8am-4pm Noon-8pm 4pm-midnight 10pm-6amShift Shift Shift Shift Shift Total Cost
Number Working 48 31 39 43 15 $30,610
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.14McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Algebraic Formulation
Let Si = Number working shift i (for i = 1 to 5),
Minimize Cost = $170S1 + $160S2 + $175S3 + $180S4 + $195S5
subject toTotal agents 6AM–8AM: S1 ≥ 48Total agents 8AM–10AM: S1 + S2 ≥ 79Total agents 10AM–12PM: S1 + S2 ≥ 65Total agents 12PM–2PM: S1 + S2 + S3 ≥ 87Total agents 2PM–4PM: S2 + S3 ≥ 64Total agents 4PM–6PM: S3 + S4 ≥ 73Total agents 6PM–8PM: S3 + S4 ≥ 82Total agents 8PM–10PM: S4 ≥ 43Total agents 10PM–12AM: S4 + S5 ≥ 52Total agents 12AM–6AM: S5 ≥ 15
andSi ≥ 0 (for i = 1 to 5)
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.15McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Summary of Formulation Procedure forCost-Benefit-Tradeoff Problems
1. Identify the activities for the problem at hand.
2. Identify an appropriate overall measure of performance (commonly cost).
3. For each activity, estimate the contribution per unit of the activity to the overall measure of performance.
4. Identify the benefits that must be achieved.
5. For each benefit, identify the minimum acceptable level and then the contribution of each activity to that benefit.
6. Enter the data in steps 3 and 5 into data cells.
7. Designate changing cells for displaying the decisions.
8. In the row for each benefit, use SUMPRODUCT to calculate the level achieved. Enter ≤ and the minimum acceptable level in two adjacent cells.
9. Designate a target cell. Use SUMPRODUCT to calculate this measure of performance.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.16McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
The Big M Distribution-Network Problem
• The Big M Company produces a variety of heavy duty machinery at two factories. One of its products is a large turret lathe.
• Orders have been received from three customers for the turret lathe.
Question: How many lathes should be shipped from each factory to each customer?
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.17McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Some Data
Shipping Cost for Each Lathe
To Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3
From Output
Factory 1 $700 $900 $800 12 lathes
Factory 2 800 900 700 15 lathes
Order Size 10 lathes 8 lathes 9 lathes
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.18McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
The Distribution Network
F1
C2
C3
C1
F2
12 latheproduced
15 lathesproduced
10 lathesneeded
8 lathesneeded
9 lathesneeded
$700/lathe
$900/lathe
$800/lathe
$800/lathe $900/lathe
$700/lathe
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.19McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Spreadsheet Formulation
3456789101112131415
B C D E F G HShipping Cost
(per Lathe) Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3Factory 1 $700 $900 $800Factory 2 $800 $900 $700
TotalShipped
Units Shipped Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3 Out OutputFactory 1 10 2 0 12 = 12Factory 2 0 6 9 15 = 15
Total To Customer 10 8 9= = = Total Cost
Order Size 10 8 9 $20,500
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.20McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Algebraic Formulation
Let Sij = Number of lathes to ship from i to j (i = F1, F2; j = C1, C2, C3).
Minimize Cost = $700SF1-C1 + $900SF1-C2 + $800SF1-C3 + $800SF2-C1 + $900SF2-C2 + $700SF2-C3
subject toFactory 1: SF1-C1 + SF1-C2 + SF1-C3 = 12Factory 2: SF2-C1 + SF2-C2 + SF2-C3 = 15Customer 1: SF1-C1 + SF2-C1 = 10Customer 2: SF1-C2 + SF2-C2 = 8Customer 3: SF1-C3 + SF2-C3 = 9
andSij ≥ 0 (i = F1, F2; j = C1, C2, C3).
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.21McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Types of Functional Constraints
Type Form* Typical Interpretation Main Usage
Resource constraint LHS ≤ RHSFor some resource, Amount used ≤ Amount available
Resource-allocation problems and mixed problems
Benefit constraint LHS ≥ RHSFor some benefit, Level achieved ≥ Minimum Acceptable
Cost-benefit-trade-off problems and mixed problems
Fixed-requirement constraint
LHS = RHSFor some quantity, Amount provided = Required amount
Distribution-network problems and mixed problems
* LHS = Left-hand side (a SUMPRODUCT function). RHS = Right-hand side (a constant).
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.22McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Formulating an LP Spreadsheet Model
• Enter all of the data into the spreadsheet. Color code (blue).
• What decisions need to be made? Set aside a cell in the spreadsheet for each decision variable (changing cell). Color code (yellow with border).
• Write an equation for the objective in a cell. Color code (orange with heavy border).
• Put all three components (LHS, ≤/=/≥, RHS) of each constraint into three cells on the spreadsheet.
• Some Examples:– Production Planning
– Diet / Blending
– Workforce Scheduling
– Transportation / Distribution
– Assignment
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.23McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Product Mix Exercise
Blue Ridge Hot Tubs manufactures and sells two models of hot tubs: the Aqua-Spa and the Hydro-Lux. Howie Jones, the owner and manager of the company needs to decide how many of each type of hot tub to produce during his next production cycle. Howie buys prefabricated fiberglass hot tub shells from a local supplier and adds the pump and tubing to the shells to create his hot tubs. (The supplier has the capacity to deliver as many hot tub shells as Howie needs.) Howie installs the same type of pump into both hot tubs. He will have only 200 pumps available during his next production cycle. From a manufacturing standpoint, the main difference between the two models of hot tubs is the amount of tubing and labor required. Each Aqua-Spa requires 9 hours of labor and 12 feet of tubing. Each Hydro-Lux requires 6 hours of labor and 16 feet of tubing. Howie expects to have 1,566 production labor hours and 2,880 feet of tubing available during the next production cycle. Howie earns a profit of $350 on each Aqua-Spa he sells and $300 on each Hydro-Lux he sells. He is confident that he can sell all the hot tubs he produces. The question is, how many Aqua-Spas and Hydro-Luxes should Howie produce if he wants to maximize his profits during the next production cycle?
Source: Ragsdale, Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.24McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Elements Common to Every Problem
Decision variables:
number of aqua-spas (A) to produce and
number of hydro-luxes (H) to produce.
Objective function: Max: Profit = 350 A + 300 H
Constraints:
Pump 1A + 1H <= 200
Labor 9A + 6H <= 1566
Tubing 12A + 16H <= 2880
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.25McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105120135150165180195210225240255270285300
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
195
210
225
240
255
270
285
300AquaSpa
HydroLux
Payoff: 300.0 HydroLux + 350.0 AquaSpa = 0.0Optimal Decisions(HydroLux,AquaSpa): ( 0.0, 0.0)
Pump: 1.0HydroLux + 1.0AquaSpa <= 200.0
Graphical Solution Using Graphic LP Optimizer
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.26McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105120135150165180195210225240255270285300
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
135
150
165
180
195
210
225
240
255
270
285
300AquaSpa
HydroLux
Payoff: 300.0 HydroLux + 350.0 AquaSpa = 0.0Optimal Decisions(HydroLux,AquaSpa): ( 0.0, 0.0)
Pump: 1.0HydroLux + 1.0AquaSpa <= 200.0
: 6.0HydroLux + 9.0AquaSpa <= 1566.0
Graphical Solution Using Graphic LP Optimizer
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.27McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
0 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99 108 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 180
081624324048566472808896104112120128136144152160168
AquaSpa
HydroLux
Payoff: 300.0 HydroLux + 350.0 AquaSpa = 27431.8Optimal Decisions(HydroLux,AquaSpa): ( 0.0, 0.0)
Pump: 1.0HydroLux + 1.0AquaSpa <= 200.0
: 6.0HydroLux + 9.0AquaSpa <= 1566.0
: 16.0HydroLux + 12.0AquaSpa <= 2880.0
Graphical Solution Using Graphic LP Optimizer
Constraints
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.28McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
0 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99 108 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 180
081624324048566472808896104112120128136144152160168
AquaSpa
HydroLux
Payoff: 300.0 HydroLux + 350.0 AquaSpa = 27431.8Optimal Decisions(HydroLux,AquaSpa): ( 0.0, 0.0)
Pump: 1.0HydroLux + 1.0AquaSpa <= 200.0
: 6.0HydroLux + 9.0AquaSpa <= 1566.0
: 16.0HydroLux + 12.0AquaSpa <= 2880.0
Graphical Solution Using Graphic LP Optimizer
Feasible Solution Space
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.29McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
0 9 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99 108 117 126 135 144 153 162 171 180
081624324048566472808896104112120128136144152160168
AquaSpa
HydroLux
Payoff: 300.0 HydroLux + 350.0 AquaSpa = 66100.0
Optimal Decisions(HydroLux,AquaSpa): (78.0, 122.0)
Pump: 1.0HydroLux + 1.0AquaSpa <= 200.0
: 6.0HydroLux + 9.0AquaSpa <= 1566.0
: 16.0HydroLux + 12.0AquaSpa <= 2880.0
Graphical Solution Using Graphic LP Optimizer
Optimal Solution
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.30McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Organizing Spreadsheet & Entering Formulas
D6. =SUMPRODUCT($B$5:$C$5,B6:C6)
D9. =SUMPRODUCT($B$5:$C$5,B9:C9)
D10. =SUMPRODUCT($B$5:$C$5,B10:C10)
D11. =SUMPRODUCT($B$5:$C$5,B11:C11)
Decision Variable Cells
Decision Variable Coefficients
Constraint Coefficients
Constraint RHS Formulas
Constraint RHS Limits
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.31McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Tools | Solver
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.32McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
Sensitivity Analysis
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.33McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
A Classic Problem
See In class handout.
First, identify the decision variables, objective function and constraints.
Second, think about spreadsheet layout.
Third, implement and solve model.
Optimization© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003
4.34McGraw-Hill/IrwinModified for Quan 6610 by Dr. Jim Grayson
In Class Exercise
End of chapter problem 4.6