mcfadden act (1927) and douglas amendment (1956) limit interstate branching
DESCRIPTION
McFadden Act (1927) and Douglas Amendment (1956) limit interstate branching Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act (1994) deregulates branching Gramm-Leach-Biley Financial Services Modernization Act (1999) repeals Glass-Steagall. Regulating Finance. Lots of bases to cover - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
•McFadden Act (1927) and Douglas Amendment (1956) limit interstate branching•Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act (1994) deregulates branching•Gramm-Leach-Biley Financial Services Modernization Act (1999) repeals Glass-Steagall
Regulating Finance• Lots of bases to cover
Cover one by regulation or deregulation
Unintended Consequences
• Reactions to regulatory policies
frustrate regulator intentRegulate bank balance sheets off-balance sheet activities
Emplace a safety net bankers become skydivers
• Regulation spreads to cover innovations
complexity ineffectiveness
Win by gaming the system
Primary Supervisory Responsibility of Bank Regulatory Agencies
• Comptroller of the Currency—national banks chartered by Federal government since 1863
• Federal Reserve and state banking authorities—state banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System
• Fed also regulates bank holding companies
• FDIC—insured state banks that are not Fed members
• State banking authorities—state banks without FDIC insurance
Innovations: Response to Interest Rate Volatility• Adjustable-rate mortgages• Financial Derivatives
Innovations: Response to Information Technology• Bank credit and debit cards• Electronic banking
– ATM/Home banking/ABM/Virtual banking• Junk bonds• Commercial paper market … backed by banks• Securitization
Innovations:Avoiding Regulation/Loophole Mining• Sweep accounts … reserve requirements• Money Market Mutual Funds … Regulation Q
Decline of Traditional BankingDecline in cost advantages in acquiring funds (liabilities)
Rising inflation rise in interest rates and disintermediationLow-cost source of funds, checkable deposits, declined in importance
Decline in income advantages on uses of funds (assets)Information technology less need for banks to finance short-term credit and issue loans IT lower transaction costs for other financial institutions
Bank Responses: •Riskier Lending … Commercial real estate, leveraged buyouts, takeovers•Off balance sheet activities
Size Distribution of Insured Commercial Banks, September 30, 2008 ????
3,0464,039 486 867,640
39.952.9 6.1 1.1
1.3 9.710.079.0
Ten Largest Banks in the World, 2007 $ Revenues1. ING Group, Netherlands 6. BNP Paribas, France2. Fortis, Belgium/Netherlands 7. Credit Agricole, France3. Citigroup, US 8. Deutsche Bank, Germany4. Dexia Group, Belgium 9. Bank of America, US5. HSBC Holdings, UK 10. UBS, Switzerland
Ten Largest Non – US Banks, December 30, 2008
Bank Consolidation
• Benefits of bank consolidation
Increased competition close inefficient banks
Efficiencies from economies of scale and scope
Lower chance of failure -- diversified portfolios• Costs
Fewer community banks less lending to small business
Banks in new areas increased risks/failures
Skirting branch restrictions•ATMs, Bank Holding Cos.
Interstate Banking and BranchingEfficiency Act, 1994
Pre-Crisis Findings:•Net interest margin up•ROA, ROE up for big banks•Intrastate deregulation more positive for all but big banks•Interstate deregulation helps big banks most•Non-performing loans down for biggest banks but up for smaller banks•State of economy has stronger impact on bank performance than branching deregulation
Geographic deregulation
Skirting branch restrictions•ATMs, Bank Holding Cos.
10
The U.S. regulatory regime: In need of reform?
Sources: Financial Services Roundtable (2007), Milken Institute.
National banks State commercial and savings banks
Federal savings banks
Insurance companies
Securities brokers/dealers
Other financial companies, including mortgage
companies and brokers
• Fed• OTS
• OCC• FDIC
• State bank regulators• FDIC• Fed--state member commerical banks
• OTS• FDIC
• 50 State insurance regulators plus District of Columbia and Puerto Rico
• FINRA• SEC• CFTC• State securities regulators
• Fed• State licensing (if needed)• U.S. Treasury for some products
• OCC• Host county regulator
• Fed• Host county regulator
• OTS• Host county regulator
Federal branch
Foreign branch
Limited foreign branch
Fed is the umbrella or consolidated regulator
Primary/secondaryfunctionalregulator
Notes:Justice Department: Assesses effects of mergers and acquisitions on competitionFederal Courts: Ultimate decider of banking, securities, and insurance productsCFTC: Commodity Futures Trading CommissionFDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFed: Federal ReserveFINRA: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority GSEs: Government Sponsored Enterprises OCC: Comptroller of the CurrencyOTS: Office of Thrift SupervisionSEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
• Federal Housing Finance Agency
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Federal Home Loan Banks
Financial, bank and thrift holding companies
Justice Department• Assesses effects of mergers and acquisitions on competition
Federal courts• Ultimate decider of banking, securities, and insurance products
Asymmetric Information and Bank RegulationGovernment safety net• Deposit insurance and FDIC
– Short circuits bank failures and contagion effect• Payoff method• Purchase and assumption method
• Fed as lender of last resort: Too BIG to Fail• Financial consolidation Exacerbates Too Big to Fail• Safety net extended to non-bank financial institutions
Safety Net Moral Hazard Problems – Depositors don’t impose discipline of marketplace– Banks have an incentive to take on greater risk
Safety Net Adverse Selection Problems– Risk-lovers find banking attractive– Depositors have little reason to monitor bank
Attempted solutions: Constrain banks from taking too much risk• Promote diversification• Prohibit holdings of common stock• Set capital requirements … Capital as cushion
• Minimum leverage ratio• Basel Accord: risk-based capital requirements
… but there’s regulatory arbitragePrompt corrective action: Close ‘em down when capital inadequate
• Monitor … CAMELS– Capital adequacy– Asset quality– Management– Earnings– Liquidity– Sensitivity to market risk
• Disclosure requirements … mark-to-market issue
• Restrictions on competition … make banking boring
Failed Banks Update
Year Number• 2000 2• 2001 4• 2002 11• 2003 3• 2004 4• 2005/2006 0• 2007 3• 2008 QI+Q2 4• 2008 Q3 10• 2008 Q4 12• 2009 Q1 21• 2009 Q2 24• 2009 Q3 50
1980s S&L and Banking Crisis
• Financial innovation increased risk taking
• Increased deposit insurance moral hazard
• Deregulation
• Lack of management expertise
• Rapid growth in new lending: real estate
– Activities expanded in scope
– Regulators at FSLIC lacked expertise
• High interest rates/recession
increased incentives for moral hazard
1980s S&L and Banking Crisis: • Regulatory forbearance by FSLIC
– Insufficient funds to close insolvent S&Ls– Established to encourage growth– Did not want to admit agency was in trouble
• Zombie S&Ls taking on high risk projects and attracting business from healthy S&Ls
• Politicians lobbied by S&L interests
• Competitive Equality in Banking Act of 1987– Inadequate funding– Continued forbearance
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989
• Regulatory apparatus restructured– Federal Home Loan Bank Board relegated to the OTS– FSLIC given to the FDIC– RTC established to manage and resolve insolvent thrifts
• Cost of the bailout approximately $150 billion• Re-restricted asset choices
• Increased core-capital leverage requirements
• Imposed same risk-based capital standards as those on commercial banks
• Enhanced enforcement powers of regulators
• Did not resolve underlying moral hazard and adverse selection problems