mba 550 final project
TRANSCRIPT
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
MBA 550: Leading in an Organization
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
By: Kelly A. Giambra
Southern New Hampshire University
Module 9 July 24, 2016
1
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Abstract
The paper will present a leadership analysis of Warren Buffett, the CEO and largest
shareholder of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. The specific elements that are covered include teams,
organizational vision, organizational culture, problem-solving, conflict management, and a
professional self-assessment. The section about teams analyzes how Warren Buffett structured
the organization of Berkshire Hathaway, and provides some best practices that were used to
organize teams. The sections on organizational vision and culture assesses Warren Buffett’s
leadership style of extreme autonomy and how this structures the culture of his organization.
Problem-solving and conflict management are covered in Sections IV and V, which includes
some examples of how Buffett handles problems and conflict at Berkshire Hathaway. Sections
VI and VII, conclude with my professional self-assessment using the top five strengths found as
a result of the Clifton StrengthFinder analysis tool.
2
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Introduction: Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Warren Buffett is the CEO and largest shareholder of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., a
holding company who owns subsidiaries of various types of businesses. Berkshire Hathaway
invests mainly in media assets, insurance, oil, and lower performing businesses with a
competitive advantage (Forbes, 2016). The Company owns several familiar companies such as
Geico, Dairy Queen, Fruit of the Loom, and has large investments in Wells Fargo, Fruit of the
Loom, IBM, and Coca-Cola (Forbes, 2016). In recent years, Buffett purchased hundreds of
millions of stock in Phillips 66, an energy firm. He has also teamed up with 3G Capital for
additional investment deals with Kraft Foods, Heinz, Burger King, and Tim Hortons (Forbes,
2016).
Warren Buffet was born in Omaha, Nebraska in 1930 and is approximately 85 years of
age. He is nicknamed and frequently referred to as the “Sage of Omaha” and the “Oracle of
Omaha” in the media (Bio, 2016). Buffett has an estimated net worth of approximately 66.4
billion and has been known for both his philanthropy and very successful investment strategies.
In 2016, he was ranked by Forbes as being one of the top three billionaires and one of the top 13
most powerful people in the United States (U.S.) (Forbes, 2016). He also had ownership in the
company Salomon Brothers, was a former director of Coca Cola, and held similar leadership
roles at Citigroup Global, Graham Holdings Company, and Gillette (Bio, 2016).
Warren Buffett’s Career Track
Warren Buffett began his career at the very young age of 11, where he found himself
having a natural talent for math, investments, finance, and business matters (Bio, 2016). Since
his father was a stockbroker, Buffett would often visit his workplace to help, which eventually
led to his first stock purchase of three shares of Cities Service Preferred (Bio, 2016). It was at
3
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
that point in which Buffett had learned his first lesson on the patience of investing (Bio, 2016).
When the stock had initially plunged, Buffett waited for the stock to increase and then sold it.
However, he later regretted selling the stock because it increased to an even higher value.
When Buffett was only 13 years old, he began running two businesses. The first business
involved newspaper delivery, and the second business involved a horseracing tip sheet sales. In
high school, Buffett partnered in with a friend to purchase a pinball machine where they used
profits to buy other machines and then re-sell them for a profit (Bio, 2016). As a young adult, he
attended the University of Pennsylvania with a major in Business, and then later achieved a
Bachelor’s degree from the University of Nebraska. In 1951, Buffett attended the Columbia
University School of Business where he earned a Master’s degree (Bio, 2016).
Immediately out of graduate school, Buffett sold stocks for Buffett-Falk & Company and
then later worked as an analyst at Graham-Newham Corporation. In 1956, he formed a first
partnership, Buffett Partnership, Ltd, in Omaha, Nebraska. From that point on, Buffett became
very successful in identifying undervalued businesses to invest in for multi-million dollar profits
(Bio, 2016). Buffett first acquired stock in Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. in 1960 and then ended up
taking full control of the company only five years later. In 1969, Buffett closed the partnership
business in order to focus more on Berkshire Hathaway.
I. Teams and Warren Buffett
How Warren Buffett Structured the Organization of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
The organizational structure of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. is considered very diverse with
many businesses that operate within several types of industries. The Company holds stocks in
many large and well known U.S. publically traded companies such as Coca-Coca, Kraft Heinz,
IBM, American Express, and Wells Fargo (Carpenter, 2015). Berkshire Hathaway also owns
several private companies with commonly known brand names such as Geico, the McLane
4
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Company, and Burlington North Santa Fe (Carpenter, 2015). The Company’s headquarters are
located in Omaha, Nebraska and consist of a team of about 24 employees who are responsible
for SEC filings and other administrative duties. According to Buffet: “they handle all of these
business tasks cheerfully and with efficiency, while making my life easy and pleasant” (Ro,
2014).
Warren Buffett’s Team Management Style
When it comes to team management, Buffett’s organization is uniquely based upon a
“well founded” reputation in the investment community (Larcker & Tayan, 2009). The
operating structure of Berkshire Hathaway is generally “decentralized” because the performance
obligations are placed under the control of the managers of its many subsidiaries, with little or no
interference from Buffett. Berkshire Hathaway is a holding company, which is “a type of entity
that may own either a portion or all of another company’s assets” (Gilani, 2016). Thus, the
Company exists for the main purpose of holding a percentage of the stock of a company and
owns subsidiary businesses as a part of its investment portfolio. Since holding companies
consist of several businesses, it would be difficult for Buffett to personally manage and control
each team.
Warren Buffett and the Berkshire Hathaway Executive Team
Warren Buffett has been the Chairman, CEO, and President of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
since 1970 (Bloomberg, 2016). He is also the Owner of IMC Group and the Manager of
Burlington Northern Sante Fe, LLC (Bloomberg, 2016). Buffett’s professional background
consists of experience with managing teams of both publically and privately traded companies.
A majority of the senior managers and directors of Berkshire Hathaway’s subsidiaries’ are also
shareholders of the businesses they manage. As a result, the team structure, decision-making, and
operational functions all fall under the direct management of these subsidiaries (Stern, n.d.).
5
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Buffett’s immediate team consists of both a Board of Directors and “C-Suite” Executives, whom
have strong backgrounds in financing, investing, leadership, and other business strategies
(Bloomberg, 2016).
Buffett is also known for having a “laisse-faire” or hands-off management style where he
allows for various co-leaders and managers to have “extreme autonomy” when making decisions
(Stern, n.d.). The concept of laisse-fair involves a team’s completion of tasks or projects under
little supervision, so they are able to make decisions independently (Cheah, 2016). The leader
allows for managers to work on projects alone and only interferes if deemed necessary.
According to Buffett: “We tend to let our many subsidiaries operate on their own, without
supervising and monitoring them to any degree. Most managers use the independence we grant
them magnificently, by maintaining an owner-oriented attitude” (Stern, n.d.). Therefore, Buffett
tends to invest in companies that are already well organized, and keeps those managers in place
since they are already familiar with the business.
Evaluation of Best Practices Used by Warren Buffett to Develop the Executive Team
As a leader of Berkshire Hathaway, one of Buffett’s best practices has involved having a
“no nonsense” attitude and down-to-earth style of leadership (Forbes, 2016). With this in mind,
Buffett seeks out employees who are intelligent, have high levels of energy, and demonstrate
integrity. As an additional best practice, Buffett keeps the hiring levels at a minimum so that he
can free up more capital in order to invest in business growth. He also prefers to have board
members whom relate to and identify with their shareholders. Buffett does not believe in paying
excessive salaries for these directors, and does not carry liability insurance to protect the board
members (McGregor, 2015).
6
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
The board of Berkshire Hathaway consists of split roles of the CEO and Chairman,
instead of having one person who assumes both roles. The reason for this is that in the event that
the CEO needs to be replaced, it would not be as difficult if they were also the Chairman
(McGregor, 2015). Buffett believes that a company should not be led by a CEO who is
“arrogant, bureaucratic, or complacent” because these leadership traits have been known to cause
failure in some of the strongest companies like General Motors, IBM, and Sears Roebuck
(McGregor, 2015). He places his trust in managers, does not micromanage, and treats employees
the way he would like to be treated. Buffet is known for being humble and also willingly admits
to making mistakes, while paying credit to others when credit is due (McGregor, 2015). Thus,
recognition and team work is important part of Berkshire Hathaway and Buffett’s leadership
style.
Subsequently, the leader’s skills have helped to improve overall operations, structure, and
communication within Berkshire Hathaway. For one, the Company is small consisting of
roughly 25 co-leaders responsible for overseeing the business. Virtually all of its operations
remain within the executives in charge of Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio, along with Buffett and
his long time co-partner, Charlie Munger (Irwin, 2015). All of these leaders decide on how they
should allocate capital over the different potential investments (Irwin, 2015). In addition,
Buffett’s reputation as a leader has made Berkshire Hathaway one of the primary choices for
businesses looking to sell while leaving their company still intact (Irwin, 2015).
Warren Buffett and Team Management
The term team may be defined as “a group of individuals whom meet over a given period
of time to pursue a shared goal of completing a task or project” (AMA, 2014). The notion of
teamwork emphasizes groups working together to overcome barriers, find new opportunities,
7
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
improve productivity, and develop problem-solving skills (AMA,2014). Some common team
characteristics may include openness, acceptance, understanding of common goals, assessing
progress and results, and sharing trust (AMA, 2014). One of Buffett’s best practices in this
regard involves rewarding both the team and subsidiaries according their level of production
(McAleenan, 2015). Buffett does not hassle the team for updates, and only requests that bad
news be reported immediately so that the issue can be promptly addressed (McAleenan, 2015).
The leader has simulated the idea to his managers they are the owners of the business. Buffett
believes this is a best practice to consider when there are exceptional employees considered as
indispensable to the Company (McAleen, 2015).
In recent years, team structure has become a significant part of organizational dynamics,
and most businesses today use some form of team work (Morgeson, DeRue, & Karam, 2010).
For instance, a 2010 survey of upper-level managers, had revealed that 91 percent agreed that
teams are the key to organizational success (Morgeson, et.al, 2010). Buffett’s leadership style
appears to involve “team self-management” which is a more indirect form of teamwork, as his
subsidiaries generally manage themselves (Morgeson, et.al, 2010). Many theories surrounding
self-managed teams have shown that members who complete tasks and solve problems on their
own typically becomes stronger and more resilient (Morgeson, et.al, 2010).
Warren Buffett and the Three Dimensions of Team Development and Communication
The three dimensions of team development and communication are energy, engagement,
and exploration, all present in high performing teams like Berkshire Hathaway (Sorenson, n.d.).
Buffett tends to look for highly energetic managers to become a part of his team and encourages
both formal and informal communication (Rhee, 2013). He also engages his managers by
motivating them using financial and emotional rewards for jobs well done (Allan, 2014). This
8
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
exploration dimension typically occurs both at Buffett’s annual meetings with shareholders, and
on a monthly basis when managers submit their financial reports to the Berkshire headquarters
(Cheah, 2016).
II. Organizational Vision and Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
How Warren Buffett Developed the Strategic Plan for Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Buffett’s strategic plan for Berkshire Hathaway consists of investing in companies that
have products or services which rarely change so they are easier to re-sell and manage (Buffett &
Clark, 2009). The leader tends to look for certain characteristics when identifying these types of
businesses. For one, Buffett manages and invests in businesses that spend less capital then what
they earn, such as brand name products like Coca-Cola. As a well-known company, Coca-Cola
does not usually over-spend on research and development or repurchasing new equipment to
develop new products. This allows for the same equipment to be reused over several years, so
that money can be saved to expand, increase capital for more internal growth, and provide better
pay to its company managers (Buffett & Clark, 2009).
Warren Buffett’s Management Roles, Functions, and Impact on Improvement
According Munger, “the Berkshire system is essential for success in management”
(Lowenstein, 2015). When it comes to management, Berkshire Hathaway tends to look for
people with “hands-on” experience in investing (Irwin, 2015). In addition, Buffett compensates
these managers according to their success at meeting performance goals and regardless of the
Company’s profits (Irwin, 2015). Buffett also emphasizes the importance of “capital allocation”,
and allows for managers to be autonomous in their decisions (Lowenstein, 2015). He is non-
bureaucratic, thinks on the short term, and does not offer earnings guidance, regular stock splits,
or stock options to employees (Lowenstein, 2015).
9
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
As a manager, Buffet typically pursues ownership in companies with certain “inherent
business economics”, who people already desire to work for so that the organization requires
little improvement (Buffet & Clark, 2009). Buffett also believes that the best companies to
invest in and have ownership in are the ones that offer their employees opportunities for
advancement, job security, and options to make more money from within (Buffett & Clark,
2009).
The Strategic Direction of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
The strategic direction of Berkshire Hathaway consists of a course of action that leads the
business to achieve its specific goals and objectives. As a leader, Buffett establishes this by using
facts, analysis, intuition, and experience, in order to achieve the Company’s vision. The strategic
direction of Berkshire Hathaway is clearly stated in the Company’s 2015 letter to shareholders.
However, due to Buffett and Munger’s advanced ages, there has been some concern over the
Company’s succession plan when the two are no longer around (Chipmann, 2015). As Buffett
stated in his 2015 letter: “Charlie is 92, and I am 85. If we were partners with you in a small
business, and were in charge of running the place, you would want to look in occasionally to
make sure we hadn’t drifted off into la-la land (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016)”.
In contrast, a panel of speakers from Stanford University recently discussed the future of
Berkshire Hathaway. It was agreed that the Company’s organizational culture is likely to survive
past Buffett’s leadership (Chipmann, 2015). The panelists also agreed that Buffett’s embedment
of the three core values of integrity, autonomy, and permanence are likely to continue so long as
they have the right successor (Chipmann, 2015). Berkshire Hathaway’s revenues have continued
to grow which is a positive sign of the Company’s strategic direction. In 2015, the Company’s
total revenues increased by about 16 billion (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016). A significant part of
10
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
the increase was due to the Buffett’s increase in ownership interest of American Express, Coca-
Cola, IBM, and Wells Fargo (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016).
Permanence is another one of Berkshire Hathaway’s most important cultural values. The
Company currently employs over 300,000 people worldwide within 80+ subsidiaries and
includes the same 25 staff members at Berkshire’s Omaha headquarters. Buffett attributes this
permanence to efficiency because he only hires if needed and does not feel a need to restructure
his workforce. In addition, Berkshire Hathaway has never sold a single one of its subsidiaries
within its 50-year history (Chipmann, 2015). As a result, the future of the Company requires for
Buffett and Munger’s successors to follow through with these values and continue on with
Berkshire Hathaway’s mission, vision, culture, and strategic direction.
The Organizational Vision and Mission of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
An organization’s vision statement may be defined as “a brief statement created to help
an organization clearly define its purpose and goals”, and is often accompanied with a mission
statement (Carpenter, Bauer, & Erdogan, 2016). A mission statement may be defined as “a
statement identifying an organization’s reason for being, as well as what it does to serve its
customers, employees, and shareholders” (Carpenter, et.al.). Remarkably, Berkshire Hathaway
does not have a formal vision or mission statement, which is highly uncommon in businesses
today. In fact, a recent study conducted by Bain and Company found that almost 90 percent of
firms surveyed have some form of mission and vision statement to which they base their
organization (Carpenter, et.al.).
Despite the Berkshire Hathaway’s lack thereof, Buffett is certainly a leader with a clear
vision. The leader often describes where industries are going, and then acquires those companies
with strong managers, to help carry out the goals and objectives of their subsidiaries. Buffett
11
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
also discusses the vision, goals, and investment strategies of Berkshire Hathaway every year in
his renowned letters to shareholders. As Buffett states in his 2015 letter, “to achieve our goals,
we emphasize the avoidance of bloat, by buying businesses such as PCC that have long been run
by cost-conscious and efficient managers” (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016). Thus, Buffett places a
great level of trust in his managers’ in having the knowledge and capabilities to shape the overall
vision of their own companies.
Furthermore, as evidenced by Berkshire Hathaway’s continued growth, the lack of a
formal mission and vision statement does not appear to be hindering this Company in any way.
Buffett prefers to be efficient and run his organization using a non-bureaucratic structure. He
states in his 2015 letter that the future of Berkshire Hathaway will be “to continue to operate
with extreme, almost unheard of decentralization” (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016). Considering
this, there was no mention of either he or Charlie Munger retiring anytime soon, even though
both are ages 85 and 92 respectively. The two partners merely expect their successors to carry
on Berkshire Hathaway’s basic mission of improving earnings for their many subsidiaries,
acquiring more profitable companies, continuing growth for investees, and repurchasing
Berkshire shares when available at a discount (Berkshire Hathaway, 2016).
III. Organizational Culture of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
How Warren Buffett Influences Corporate Culture
Organizational culture may be defined as “the unified beliefs and values which exist
within an organization over a period of time and its members’ attitudes and behaviors that
influence the value of their work” (Tsai, 2011). The corporate culture of Berkshire Hathaway is
strongly influenced by Buffett’s own values. Hence, the Company stresses the importance of
ethics, honesty, integrity, longevity, and customer satisfaction within their culture (Larckner &
12
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Tayan, 2015). When choosing its directors, Berkshire Hathaway seeks out professionals who
already possess these similar values, as well as industry-based knowledge and a genuine interest
in their business (Corporate Governance, n.d.). The Company’s directors, officers, employees,
and subsidiaries all must adhere to its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
According to Buffett, “I want employees to ask themselves whether they are willing to
have any contemplated act appear the next day on the front page of the local paper” (Code of,
n.d.).
Nonetheless, a majority of Berkshire Hathaway’s subsidiaries’ CEOs strongly believe that the
organization’s culture is based upon maintaining a good reputation, running your business as if
it’s your own, and placing integrity as first and foremost (Larcker & Tayan, 2015). Ultimately,
the Berkshire system is based upon the philosophy that managers who are given complete and
total autonomy on the long-term will perform better.
In effect, a survey conducted on what it’s like to work for Berkshire Hathaway found that
most of its CEOs agreed their financial performance is much better than it would be if not owned
by Buffett (Larcker & Tayan, 2015). The reasons for this ranged from the advantage of being
autonomous, to brand value, financial strength, and Buffett’s long term investment strategy
(Larcker & Tayan, 2015). All in all, it is the managers of these subsidiaries that help create a
unique culture where behavior and performance expectations are the utmost importance. Since
Buffett is non-bureaucratic, he trusts these managers with such extreme autonomy since he
believes it promotes more accountability than it would if there were too much oversight.
IV. Problem-Solving
Problem-Solving and Conflict Management at Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
13
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Problem-solving and conflict management are a fundamental part of both everyday life
and business. The most important elements involve being able to recognize the problem and this
may range in complexity (Spaho, 2013). When problems are recognized, it is then possible for
the leader to come up with an appropriate strategy to solve it. It is the leader’s role to find the
right solution as well as implement processes that effectively manage conflict within his
organization. In addition, research has shown that problem-solving approaches to conflict
management generally result in improved satisfaction in short and long term goals and better
solutions (Weitzmann & Weitzmann, 2000).
How Warren Buffett Manages Problems at Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
At the organizational level, there are several types of approaches to managing conflict.
Warren Buffett typically addresses conflicts at Berkshire Hathaway simply by avoiding complex
business decisions. According to Buffett, “Charlie and I have not learned how to solve difficult
business problems. What we have learned is to avoid them” (Brown, 2014). The avoidant style of
conflict management is a conservative approach to problem-solving. The conservative method
of handling conflict “follows the belief that all conflict is negative and destructive so it should be
avoided” (Kaimenyi, 2014). This is common characteristic of a “laissez-fair” leader like
Buffett, since these leaders generally allow followers to solve problems on their own (Kaimenyi,
2014). “Laissez-fair” leaders also tend to surround themselves with highly skilled, experienced,
and knowledgeable managers so they are capable of working un-supervised (Kaimenyi, 2014).
Furthermore, leaders who manage conflict through avoiding tend to be more passive and
will either distance themselves or minimize their problems. This style may be most appropriate
when problems are more trivial since it is likely that the leader cannot fully solve the problem
(Spaho, 2013). Buffett states that though on occasion Berkshire Hathaway may encounter a
14
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
“larger but solvable” problem, the Company has “done better by avoiding dragons than by
slaying them” (Brown, 2014). Buffett also learns from his mistakes and then develops strategies
to prevent the same problems from occurring in the future. As theory points out, in order to
reduce conflict, it is often necessary to identify all previous conflicts, what caused those
problems, and how they were solved in the past (Spaho, 2013).
Warren Buffett and Problem-Solving During the 2008 U.S. Financial Crisis
Some of Buffett’s greatest problem-solving skills occurred during the 2008 U.S. financial
crisis. One of Buffett’s most famous quotes during this time were to “Be fearful when others are
greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful” (Das, 2013). Berkshire Hathaway was not only
able to survive the economic recession, but also continue to earn profits from it. When many
organizations were failing, Buffett handled the crisis with a strategy by “extending lifelines”
to a few blue chip companies whose market shares were down at the time
(Das, 2013). Blue chip companies are well known businesses that are less volatile, with good
reputations that can still profit even when the economy is bad. Thus, they are more reliable and
likely to grow. By 2016, Berkshire Hathaway had profited approximately 10 billion (Das, 2013).
The fact that Buffett avoids risky investing in such blue chip companies is an example of
how he manages a crisis related financial problems at Berkshire Hathaway. According to the
textbook, a success factor of a leader in an organization is to be able to think strategically and see
the big picture (Dubrin, 2016). During a financial crisis, this skill is important as a leader since
many followers may be so distracted by the problem that they see no way out (Dubrin, 2016). As
Buffett stated, “By year-end, investors of all stripes were bloodied and confused, much as if they
were small birds that had strayed into a badminton game” (Koppenheffer, 2014). In Buffett’s
15
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
2008 annual letter to shareholders, the leader had also offered insight into what caused the
financial crisis and how to prevent significant losses on the long term (Koppenheffer, 2014).
V. Conflict Management
How Warren Buffett Manages Conflict at Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
As an avoidant, Buffett prefers to defer his attention from managing conflict to trying to
prevent problems from occurring. One of his best solutions to this is by taking great care when
selecting CEOs so that strong performers are in place to withstand difficult times (Rhee, 2013).
Research has shown that solving conflicts of higher-level managers like CEOs have a negative
influence on organizational performance (Spaho, 2013). This is because it defers the leader from
other important duties (Spaho, 2013). According to Buffett, “Outstanding CEOs do not require
much management or oversight from owners, though they can additionally benefit from a
similarly exceptional board” (Rhee, 2013). Essentially, the CEOs of Berkshire Hathaway’s
various subsidiaries are given simple expectations of running their company as if 1.) they are the
only owner; 2.) it is the only asset they own, and 3.) they have no intention of selling it (Rhee,
2013).
Buffett does not usually speak out publically if he disagrees with one of his CEOs
decisions. In addition, if Berkshire Hathaway receives criticism for any of its business practices,
Buffett will defend the Company. For instance, in 2014, Coca-Cola voting shareholders had
approved a compensation plan for its executives in which Buffett had opposed (Ioselevich,
2014). He did not respond in the public, but did state at the Company’s annual meeting that
though he did oppose it, he would rather address his concerns directly with the CEO to avoid
“going to war” with a close business partner (Ioselvich, 2014). In addition, when Coca-Cola was
16
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
criticized for having unhealthy products for consumers, he diverted the topic to choice, in that
consumers choose to drink Coke products because it tastes good (Udland, 2016).
Warren Buffett and the 2008 Subprime Mortgage Crisis
Remarkably, the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis had little impact on Buffett’s Clayton
Homes, and he continued to make high risk, high cost mortgages without falling into debt or
losing profits (Haverkamp, 2008). At the time, this was almost unheard of since many banks,
mortgage lenders, and other investors suffered severe losses and legal ramifications. Berkshire
Hathaway had first acquired Clayton Homes in 2003 and is now the largest financer of mobile
homes in the U.S. (Haverkamp, 2008). Clayton Homes primarily lends to borrowers with poor
credit and lower income who are unable to afford a traditional home. Though in 2008, these
subprime borrowers were likely to default or foreclose on their mortgage, this was not the case
with Clayton. Buffett was able to avoid the subprime problem conservatively, by not structuring
a loan so that it would be difficult to repay (Haverkamp, 2008).
On the contrary, Berkshire Hathaway did receive negative publicity when Clayton Homes
was accused of engaging in predatory lending (Baker, 2015). This conflicted with Buffett’s
portrayal of being a responsible lender by helping lower income borrowers fulfill the American
dream of owning a home (Baker, 2015). When Clayton Homes was first confronted with these
accusations, the Company’s spokeswomen failed to respond (Baker, 2015). This appeared to be
the appropriate response for the Company at the time. In leadership, one aspect of using
avoidance as a strategy here involves gathering information and analyzing the situation (Dubrin,
2016).
Buffett eventually responded to Berkshire’s shareholders in defense of Clayton Homes.
He stated that the claims of predatory lending were “misleading” and that “Clayton has behaved
17
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
very well” (Das, 2015). He then when on to present factual information to his shareholders in
order to support his claim. For instance, he addressed how Clayton’s default rate was only 3
percent and most borrowers successfully pay off loans within a 20-year time frame. As Buffett
stated: “It’s true that manufactured housing hits the lower end of the market...the question is, can
you lend intelligently to people [so that they can continue] making those payments and keeping
their house?” In that regard, Clayton has been “exemplary” (Das, 2015).
VI. My Profession Self-Assessment Using the Clifton StrengthsFinder
As we see from the analysis of Warren Buffett, problem-solving and decision-making are
especially important leadership skills in everyday business. In addition, completing a self-
assessment can assist in determining a leader’s strengths and weaknesses when it comes to
managing problems and making decisions within their organization. One way of assessing these
qualities is through the usage of the Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment. The Clifton
StrengthsFinder assessment was first developed by Dr. Donald O. Clifton, based upon his 40-
year study conducted on human strengths which identified 34 most common strengths within
individuals. The assessment has been extremely effective in helping people to both discover and
recognize their inner leadership talents (Strengths Dashboard, n.d.). The results of the Clifton
StrengthFinder assessment revealed my five strengths as: 1.) Input, 2.) Intellection, 3.) Achiever,
4.) Strategic, and 5.) Learner.
Strength Number One: Input
My number one strength found as a result of the StrengthsFinder assessment is that of
“input”. According to Gallup, a person who is talented in the area of input will generally possess
a strong desire to increase their knowledge base. These individuals have a tendency to collect
and archive all kinds of information such as ideas, facts, books, articles, and quotations (Gallup
18
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Strengths Center, n.d.). Leaders with input strengths may often serve as experts or specialists
which are extremely necessary in complex industries (Schubring, 2014). They often tend to
acquire, compile, and file away information in the event that it is needed for the future. This is
important in succeeding in leadership, as strong input talents are required when making decisions
to help improve growth and performance of an organization.
Strength Number Two: Intellection
A second strength found as a result of the StrengthsFinder assessment is that of
Intellection. According to Gallup, individuals with strong intellection skills, enjoy thinking,
constant mental activity, and the exercising of their minds (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.).
Leaders with strong intellect abilities are effective at solving problems, developing ideas, and
understanding the feelings of others. Individuals with strong intellection are also introspective so
they are able to reflect upon and ponder over current and past events. These traits are beneficial
for a leader since they can serve as a “sounding board” to help team members find new ways to
solve problems and improve the quality of their work (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.).
Strength Number Three: Achiever
A third strength found as a result of my StrengthsFinder assessment is that of an achiever.
According to Gallup, achievers have a strong desire to constantly attain goals and accomplish
more (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). Achievers also enjoy facing challenges and are motivated
with future goals and assignments while requiring little or no recognition. Achievers in
leadership roles are devoted to completing tasks, and have the inner drive and energy needed to
push their team to succeed (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). Therefore, having the achiever
strength is useful in decision-making when overcoming hurdles to growth, developing strategies
needed to improve the leader’s organization, while also saving time and money for the business.
19
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Strength Number Four: Strategic
A fourth strength found as a result of the StrengthFinder assessment is that with the trait
of “Strategic” ability. According to Gallup, people who are exceptionally talented in the area of
strategy can quickly identify problems and issues (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). Strong
strategic talents are also useful in helping an organization sort through large amounts of data to
find the best possible route for success (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). This special perspective
allows for them to identify patterns and then envision the outcome of alternative, “What-if”
scenarios (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). This makes the leader very powerful in bringing forth
plans for future situations while being creative, imaginative, and persistent in the projects they
work on. A leader with this ability may quickly weigh in alternative paths to determine the best
possible and most efficient plan moving forward.
Strength Number Five: Learner
My fifth strength as a result of the StrengthFinder assessment involves the desire to learn
more and continuously improve. According to Gallup, individuals with strong learner talents are
consistently striving to learn more in order to maximize their skills (Gallup Strengths Center,
n.d.). Leaners value education and prefer the gaining of new knowledge since it increases their
level of competence. They tend to become inspired after learning new facts, studying new
subjects, and mastering their skills and abilities (Gallup Strengths Center, n.d.). This is a
valuable strength for leaders because they typically learn very quickly and present the new
information to their organization. The learner strength is especially helpful for leaders when
making business decisions that require a high level of competency.
VII. Conclusion
Self-Assessment Investigation in Comparison to Warren Buffet
20
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
In summary, this paper identified several of Warren Buffett’s leadership qualities which
have positively effected the strategic direction of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. I have found that
virtually all of these leadership traits are somewhat similar to the outcome of my five strengths
found from the Clifton StrengthFinder assessment: 1.) Input; 2.) Intellection; 3.) Achiever; 4.)
Strategic; and 5.) Learner (Gallup Strengths, n.d.). Buffett utilizes input strengths as he
frequently shares knowledge and philosophies on life and investments to the public (Watts,
2016). Each year, Buffett shares expertise in his annual letter to shareholders of Berkshire
Hathaway which is a major event for many investors (Watts, 2016).
As a leader with strong intellect, Buffett prefers to spend approximately 80 percent of the
day reading mostly annual reports of other companies’ which are often several hundred pages
(Sao, 2014). Buffett is constantly “deep in thought” assessing different companies’ competitive
advantage to decide which stocks to invest in (Sao, 2014). As an achiever, Buffett’s high level
of intelligence and natural ability to invest has led to extreme success which continues on even at
the age of 85 (Forbes, 2016). This is one of Buffett’s greatest leadership strengths as he is
frequently referred to as a “super achiever” in the media (Forbes, 2016). This is also where my
achiever qualities are slightly different from Buffett, since my accomplishments are very
different.
The fourth strength similar to Buffett as a result of my professional assessment is that of
“strategic” ability (Gallup Strengths, n.d.). As a leader, Buffett has proven to be very powerful
in strategic growth by not only bringing forth plans for future investments, but also by being
persistent in the projects that he works on. Buffett tends to use strategies that mainly use
“quantitative probability analysis” in which he has used since a young child (Sao, 2016). Buffett
also evolved his investment philosophies and over time went from buying and reselling
21
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
inexpensive companies, to buying larger competitive businesses at reasonable prices, while
holding onto them for longer or indefinite periods of time (Sao, 2014).
Lastly, a fifth strength that I found to be similar to Buffett involves the desire to “learn”
more and continuously improve (Gallup Strengths, n.d.). As a learner, Buffett consistently
strives to gain new information on investments in order to maximize returns for his organization.
Buffett is a “firm believer” that prior to investing, due diligence is necessary to learn about the
company before deciding to invest (Curtis, 2016). Along with this, Buffett believes that
investing is not always about choosing the best company, but also about minimizing risks while
maximizing long term outcome (Curtis, 2016).
References:
Allen, S.C. (2012). Warren Buffett: Corporate Manager and Motivator Extraordinaire.
InvestorsFriend. Retrieved from: http://www.investorsfriend.com/buffetts-management-
talent/
AMA. (2014). Building a Sense of Teamwork Among Staff Member. American Management
Association. Retrieved from http://www.amanet.org/training/articles/Building-a-Sense-
of-Teamwork-Among-Staff-Members.aspx
A Stanford panel discusses life after Buffett. Insights by Stanford Business. Retrieved from:
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-berkshire-hathaway-can-survive-beyond-
warren-buffett
Baker, M. & Wagner, D. (2015). The mobile-home trap: How a Warren Buffett empire preys on
the poor. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from: http://www.seattletimes.com/business/real-
estate/the-mobile-home-trap-how-a-warren-buffett-empire-preys-on-the-poor/
22
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines (n.d.). Retrieved from:
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/govern/corpgov.pdf
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Retrieved from:
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/govern/ethics.pdf
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (n.d.) To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (n.d.). Retrieved
from: http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2015ltr.pdf
Bio. (2016). Warren Buffett Biography. Bio. Com Retrieved from:
http://www.biography.com/people/warren-buffett-9230729
Bloomberg Markets. (2016). BRK/A New York Stock Quote. Retrieved June 18, 2016, from
http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BRK/A:US
Brown, J.M. (2014). Warren Buffett: These were my biggest early mistakes. The Reformed
Broker. Retrieved from: http://thereformedbroker.com/2014/05/26/warren-buffett-these-
were-my-biggest-early-mistakes/
Buffett, M., & Clark, D. (2009). Warren Buffett's management secrets: Proven tools for personal
and business success. New York: Scribner
Caldwell Partners (2013). Developing a new generation of mortgage banking leaders an industry
‘call-to-action’.
http://www.caldwellpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Developing-a-new-
generation-of-mortgage-banking-leaders.2.pdf
Carpenter, M., Bauer, T.& Erdogan, B. (2016). The Roles of Mission, Vision, and Values.
Principles of Management. Retrieved from:
http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/5?e=carpenter-ch04_s01
CFPB. (2012, March). Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act. Retrieved from
Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act.
http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201203_cfpb_update_SAFE_Act_Exam_Procedures.p
df
Cheah, A. (2016). Warren Buffett. Management Style. Retrieved June 18, 2016, from
http://agnescheah.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
Chipmann, I. (2015). How Berkshire Hathaway Can Survive Beyond Warren Buffett
Comaford, C. (2013). Mortgage Leaders Triumph in Tricky Times [Infographic].
Forbes/Leadership.
23
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christinecomaford/2013/10/17/mortgage-leaders-triumph-in-
tricky-times-infographic/#78c932f6194f
Cunningham, L.A. (2014). The Value of Corporate Culture: The Case of Berkshire Hathaway.
Columbia Business School Publishing. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/cunn17004
Curtis, G. (2016). Think Like Warren Buffett. Investopedia. Retrieved from:
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/stocks/08/buffett-style.asp Warren Buffett's
Probability Analysis Is His Key to Success
Das, A. (2013). Buffett's Crisis-Lending Haul Reaches $10 Billion. The Wall Street Journal.
Retrieved from:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304441404579119742104942198
Dollar, W. (2003). Leadership is all about Vision. WTN News. Retrieved from:
http://wtnnews.com/articles/118/
DuBrin, A.J. (2016). Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills, 8th Edition. Rochester
Institute of Technology
Forbes. (2016). The Richest Person in Every State. Forbes. Retrieved from:
http://www.forbes.com/profile/warren-buffett/
Gallup Strengths Center. (n.d.). Retrieved June 04, 2016, from
https://www.gallupstrengthscenter.com/Dashboard
Gilani, N. (2016). Divisional Structure of a Holding Company.
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/divisional-structure-holding-company-13920.html
Haverkamp, K. (2008). How Warren Buffett Avoided the Subprime Meltdown.
https://www.mortgageloan.com/how-warren-buffett-avoided-the-subprime-meltdown-
2559
IBM (2004). Interest-generating thoughts for mortgage banking CEOs. IBM business consulting
services. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/imc/pdf/g510-3634-mortgage-bank-
survey.pdf
Ioselevich, D. (2014). Warren Buffett and Effective Problem-Solving. Peppercomm Alternative
View Perspectives on Financial Communications. Retrieved from:
https://peppercommalternativeview.com/2014/05/12/warren-buffett-and-effective-
problem-solving/
24
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Irwin, N. (2015). Why Warren Buffett Is Worth $72 Billion and You’re Not. Two Theories on
Berkshire Hathaway. The New York Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/upshot/why-warren-buffett-is-worth-72-billion-and-
youre-not-two-theories-on-berkshire-hathaway.html
Larcker, D. & Tayan, B. (2009). The Management of Berkshire Hathaway. Stanford Business
School Case Studies. Retrieved from:
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/case-studies/management-berkshire-
hathaway
Kaimenyi, C.K. (2014). The Influence of Conflict Management Styles on Leadership
Approaches within Small-scale Businesses in Kenya. OSR Journal of Business and
Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 16, Issue
9.Ver. I (Sep. 2014), PP 55-59
Koppenheffer, D. (2014). The Best Advice Warren Buffett Ever Gave Was During the Financial
Crisis. The Motley Fool. Retrieved from:
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/01/23/the-best-advice-warren-buffett-ever-
gave-was-durin.aspx
Larcker, D. & Tayan, B. (2015). What It’s Like to Be Owned by Berkshire Hathaway. Harvard
Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-its-like-to-be-owned-by-berkshire-
hathaway
Lowenstein, R. (2015). Forget Buffett the investor. Follow Buffett the manager. Fortune.com.
Retrieved from: http://fortune.com/2015/04/21/warren-buffett-the-manager
Markgraf, B. (2016). Motivational Techniques for Teamwork.
http://work.chron.com/motivational-techniques-teamwork-5101.html
McAleenan, T. (2015). Lessons from Warren Buffett’s Management Style. The Conservative
Income Investor. http://theconservativeincomeinvestor.com/2015/02/28/lessons-from-
warren-buffetts-management-style/
McGregor, J. (2015). The leadership wisdom of Warren Buffett. The Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/03/02/the-leadership-
wisdom-in-warren-buffetts-letter/
25
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Morgeson, F.P., DeRue, D.S., & Karam, E.P. (2010). Leadership in Teams: A Functional
Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes. Journal of Management
/ January 2010
National Mortgage Professional (2015). Velocify Appoints Chris Backe Business Development
Director of Financial Services.
http://nationalmortgageprofessional.com/news/56206/velocify-appoints-chris-backe-
business-development-director-financial-services
Rhee, J. (2013). Governance Buffett Style. Harvard Law School Governance on Corporate
Governance and Financial Regulation. Retrieved from:
https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/03/29/governance-buffett-style/
Ro, S. (2014). Here Are All Of The People Warren Buffett Works With At Berkshire Hathaway's
HQ. Business Insider. Retrieved from: http://www.businessinsider.com/berkshire-
hathaway-corporate-office-staff-2014-3
Sao, S. (2014). Warren Buffett's Probability Analysis Is His Key To Success. Investopedia
Retrieved from: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/101314/warren-buffetts-
probability-analysis-his-key-success.asp#ixzz4BNIKuf4p
Schubring, B. (2014). What you should know about the StrengthsFinder theme of Input.
Leadership Vision. http://www.leadershipvisionconsulting.com/what-you-should-know-
about-the-strengthsfinder-theme-of-input/
Spaho, K. (2013). Organizational Communication and Conflict Management. Management,
Vol. 18, 2013, 1, pp. 103-118
Strengths Dashboard. (n.d.). Retrieved June 01, 2016, from
http://strengths.gallup.com/110389/Research-Behind-StrengthsFinder-20.aspx
Stern, G.M. (n.d.) Why Warren Buffett's Laissez-Faire Management Style Works. Investor’s
Business Daily. Retrieved from:
http://www.marshallgoldsmithlibrary.com/cim/articles_print.php?aid=897
Tsai, Y. (2011). Relationship between Organizational Culture, Leadership Behavior and Job
Satisfaction. BMC Health Services Research. Vol. 11, 2011. Retrieved from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123547/
26
Final Project Part II: Self-Assessment and Leadership Analysis of Warren Buffett
Udland, M. (2016). Warren Buffett's non-answer about investing in Coke captures what his
meeting is all about. Business Insider. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffetts-coke-response-2016-5
Watts, W. (2016). Warren Buffett’s wit and wisdom on display in annual investor letter.
Marketwatch. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/warren-buffetts-wit-and-wisdom-on-
display-in-annual-investor-letter-2016-02-27
Weitzman, E.A. & Weitzman, P.F. (2000). Problem Solving and Decision Making in Conflict
Resolution. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice San Francisco:
Jossey-Bas Publishers, 2000, pp. 185-209.
27