maturity models21
DESCRIPTION
Maturity Models Balanced ScorecardsTRANSCRIPT
Sanjay Kankaria
FRAST Branch MeetingJune 23 , 2008
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard
Frameworks For Internal Auditing
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
WHYWHY - - Maturity Models and Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks ?Balanced Scorecard Frameworks ?
The STRATEGICSTRATEGIC Question The VALUEVALUE Question
Are we delivering the right benefits ?
Are we doing the right things ?
Are we doing things the right
way ?
Are we doing things of right
quality?
The PROCESSPROCESS Question
The QUALITYQUALITY Question
2
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Business Goals
Internal Audit Goals
Internal Audit
Processes
Translate in toCheck Alignment with
Key ActivitiesControl
Objectives
MaturityModels
BalancedScore Card
InternalAudit
Strategy Maps
Control Practices
Responsibility and
Accountability Chart(s)
Activity Goals and Metrics
Bro
ken
in
to
Assessed
by
An
aly
zed
by
Assessed by
For P
erfo
rman
ce
Cau
se a
nd
eff
ect illu
stra
ted
b
y
Con
trolle
d B
yIm
ple
men
ted
by
For M
atu
rity
Assessed
for m
atu
rity b
y
Control FrameworkControl Framework3
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Business Goals
Internal Audit Goals
Internal Audit
Processes
Translate in toCheck Alignment with
Control FrameworkControl Framework4
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Internal Audit Goals
Internal Audit
Processes
Control Objectives
Control Practices
Con
trolle
d B
yIm
ple
men
ted
by
Control FrameworkControl Framework5
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Internal Audit Goals
Internal Audit
Processes
Key Activities
Responsibility and
Accountability Chart(s)
Activity Goals and Metrics
Bro
ken
in
to
Assessed
by
An
aly
zed
by
Control FrameworkControl Framework6
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Internal Audit Goals
Internal Audit
Processes
MaturityModels
BalancedScore Card
InternalAudit
Strategy Maps
Assessed by
For P
erfo
rman
ce
Cau
se a
nd
eff
ect illu
stra
ted
b
y
For M
atu
rity
Control FrameworkControl Framework7
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Maturity Models -Maturity Models -HistoryHistory
First released by Software Engineering Institute affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in 1993 as Capability Maturity Models -CMM
First released by Software Engineering Institute affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in 1993 as Capability Maturity Models -CMM
Information System Audit and Control Association ISACA Adopted it for Internal Auditing as COBIT in 1996
Information System Audit and Control Association ISACA refined it further in 2007
Maturity levels rated from a scale of non–existent level 0 to optimized – level 5
8
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Graphic Representation of Maturity Models Graphic Representation of Maturity Models
0 2 3 4 5
Non Existe
nt
Initial /Ad hoc
Repeatable
but intuitive
Defined
Process
Managed and
Measurable
Optimized
1
Maturity Levels
0 Lack of any recognizable processes / practices
1 Processes are ad hoc and disorganized
2 Processes follow a regular pattern
3 Processes are documented and communicated
4 Processes are monitored and measured
5 Good Practices are followed and automated
9
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Maturity Level
Characteristics
00 Non ExistentComplete lack of any recognizable processes
The enterprise has not even recognized that there is an issue to be addressed.
11 Initial /Ad Hoc
There is evidence that the enterprise has recognized that the issues exist and need to be addressed
There are however, no standardized processes; instead, there are ad hoc approaches that tend to be applied on an individual or case-by-case basis
The overall approach to management is disorganized.
Maturity Models Maturity Models
10
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Maturity Level Characteristics
22Repeat-able but Intuitive
Processes have developed to the stage where similar procedures are followed by different people undertaking the same task.
There is no formal training or communication of standard procedures, and responsibility is left to the individual
There is a high degree of reliance on the knowledge of individuals and, therefore, errors are likely
33DefinedProcess
Procedures have been standardized and documented, and communicated through training.
It is mandated that these processes should be followed; however, it is unlikely that deviations will be detected.
The procedures themselves are not sophisticated but are the formalization of existing practices.
Maturity Models-cont’dMaturity Models-cont’d
11
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Maturity Level
Characteristics
44Managed
And Measurable
Management monitors and measures compliance with procedures and takes action where processes appear not to be working effectively
Processes are under constant improvement and provide good practice
Automation and tools are used in a limited or fragmented way
55Optimized
Processes have been refined to a level of good practice, based on the results of continuous improvement and maturity modeling with other enterprises
IT tools are used in an integrated way to automate the workflow, providing tools to improve quality and effectiveness, making the enterprise quick to adapt.
Maturity Models-cont’dMaturity Models-cont’d
12
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Generic Maturity Model
ISACA has proposed tracking Maturity levels of following Six Generic Aspects / Dimensions / Planes
AWARENESS AND AWARENESS AND COMMUNICATIONCOMMUNICATION
POLICIES AND PROCEDURESPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES
SKILLS AND EXPERTISESKILLS AND EXPERTISE
RESPONSIBILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITYACCOUNTABILITY
GOAL SETTING AND GOAL SETTING AND MEASUREMENTMEASUREMENT
TOOLS, TEMPLATES AND TOOLS, TEMPLATES AND AUTOMATIONAUTOMATION
Generic Maturity ModelGeneric Maturity Model
13
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Balanced Scorecards - HistoryBalanced Scorecards - History
First proposed by Kaplan and Norton in an article in the Harvard Business Review in 1972.
Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation brought out a research publication “A Balanced Scorecard Framework for Internal Auditing departments” In 2002
American Accounting Association awarded a prize for “Most significant Contribution” in 2001
Further developed and refined the concept as Strategy Maps in 2001.
14
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Mechanisms to enhance VALUEMechanisms to enhance VALUE
Book - The Discipline of Market Leaders- Michel Tracey
Operational Excellence
Customer Intimacy
Innovation
15
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Balanced Scorecard Template Balanced Scorecard Template
FINANCIALS,FINANCIALS,SHAREHOLDER’SHAREHOLDER’
SSPERSPECTIVEPERSPECTIVE
GOALS MEASURES
INNOVATION, INNOVATION, FUTURE FUTURE
ORIENTATION & ORIENTATION & CAPABILITIESCAPABILITIES
GOALS MEASURES
INTERNAL, INTERNAL, BUSINESS BUSINESS
PROCESS/OPERAPROCESS/OPERATIONAL TIONAL
EXCELLENCEEXCELLENCE
GOALS MEASURES
CUSTOMER CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVEPERSPECTIVE
GOALS MEASURES
Stakeholders/
Drivers
16
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Internal Audit Focus- Internal Audit Focus- Different Views of Different stakeholdersDifferent Views of Different stakeholders
RISKS & RISKS & CONTROLSCONTROLS
CONSULTINGCONSULTING
BOARD AND BOARD AND AUDITAUDIT
COMMITTEESCOMMITTEES
MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT & OTHER & OTHER AUDITEESAUDITEES
17
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Balanced Scorecard Template Balanced Scorecard Template
BOARD & AUDITBOARD & AUDITCOMMITTEES COMMITTEES
GOALS MEASURES
INNOVATION, INNOVATION, FUTURE FUTURE
ORIENTATION & ORIENTATION & CAPABILITIESCAPABILITIES
GOALS MEASURES
INTERNAL, INTERNAL, BUSINESS BUSINESS
PROCESS/OPERAPROCESS/OPERATIONAL TIONAL
EXCELLENCEEXCELLENCE
GOALS MEASURES
MANAGEMENT &MANAGEMENT &OTHER AUDITEESOTHER AUDITEES
GOALS MEASURES
Stakeholders/
Drivers
18
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
GOALS MEASURES RATINGThe internal audit functions maintains independence with in the organization
Independent third party’s objective evaluation of Internal Audit Independence
There will not be any control related surprises/ unexpected events for the Audit Committee
Peer Director’s objective evaluation of control surprises for the Audit committee
Regular and timely communication occurs between Internal audit and audit committee
Peer Director’s objective evaluation of regular communication with the Audit committee
The audit committee will be continuously educated about the business controls , internal audit’s role etc.
Number of educational subjects as part of Agenda in Audit Committee meetings
Internal Audit meeting the expectations of Audit committee members
Audit Committee Members Satisfaction Survey results
Board & Audit Committees - Some Possible MetricsBoard & Audit Committees - Some Possible Metrics
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
19
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
GOALS MEASURES RATINGRATINGInternal Audit identifies Key issues
Number of major audit findings and recommendations
Internal Audit provides value added services
Amount of savings identified by the Auditing Department
Internal Audit provides value added services
Number of process improvements suggested by the Audit department
Internal Audit has client acceptability
Percent of Audit recommendations fully implemented by the auditee
Internal Audit has positive brand image
New clients added to client base
Internal Audit is responsive to clients needs
Average Response time to management requests
Management & Other Auditees- Some Possible MetricsManagement & Other Auditees- Some Possible Metrics
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
20
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Goals Measures RatingRatingInternal Audit will have high productivity
Completed Audits per Auditor
Internal Audit will have high Staff Utilization
Percentage of Time spent on Projects as opposed to administrative time or vacation
Internal Audit will have low turnaround time
Days from end of field work to report issuance
Internal Audit will have high coverage of organization’s activities
Completed versus Planned Audits
Internal Audit will resolve pending issues promptly
Number of Days the issue remained open after the expected closure date
Internal Audit Processes/Operational ExcellenceInternal Audit Processes/Operational Excellence – – Some Possible MetricsSome Possible Metrics
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
21
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
GOALS MEASURES RATINGRATING
Internal Audit will seek to develop the Human Capital of its staff
Training hours per Auditor
Internal Audit will encourage innovative practices
Number of new Audit templates developed by the Internal Audit
Internal Audit will identify and execute technological innovations
Number of new Software purchased / deployed by Internal Audit
Internal Audit staff would have proper professional competencies
Number of new Certifications acquired by Internal Audit
Internal Audit will maintain involvement interaction and thought leadership
Number of Best Practices identified and presented with in the organization
Innovation, Future Orientation & CapabilitiesInnovation, Future Orientation & Capabilities-Some Possible Metrics-Some Possible Metrics
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
22
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Leading/ Lagging Performance Measures Leading/ Lagging Performance Measures ContinuumContinuum
Leading Performanc
eMeasures
LaggingPerformanc
eMeasures
Training Hours
per InternalAuditor
Number of Major
Audit Findings
Percentage of Audit
Recommendations Implemented
Number of Management
Requests
Number of Process
Improvements
AuditeeSatisfaction
Survey
23
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
A Strategic Map for Internal Audit
24
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Expectations of Management from Internal AuditExpectations of Management from Internal AuditPartner in GovernancePartner in Governance
25
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Risk Related ActivitiesRisk Related Activities26
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Internal Audit Role in ERMInternal Audit Role in ERM27
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
Alternative Performance DimensionsAlternative Performance Dimensions
1 Adequate Risk Coverage
2 Better Strategic Alignment
3 Better Customer Intimacy
4 Better Performance Management Systems
5 Operational Excellence/ Better Quality / Resource Management
6 Learning & Innovation
Contribution of Internal Audit to help Organization / Clients achieve:
Achievement of following objectives within internal Department :
R Y G
2 Better Strategic Alignment
3 Better Customer Intimacy
4 Better Performance Management Systems
5 Operational Excellence/ Better Quality / Resource Management
6 Learning & Innovation
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
R Y G
28
A. Client Service Performance Measures
B. Internal performance Measures
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
WHYWHY - Maturity Models and - Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks ?Balanced Scorecard Frameworks ?
BEST BEST PRACTICESPRACTICES
Answer
STRUCTUREDNSTRUCTUREDN
ESSESS Answer
COMPLETENECOMPLETENE
SSSS Answer
OBJECTIVITYOBJECTIVITY Answer
29
Maturity Models and Balanced Scorecard Frameworks for Internal Auditing
30