matrix. of - ericdocument resume ed 396 799 jc 960 426 author neumann, richard; roberts, keith title...

27
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area Technical Coll., WI. De. of Research, Planning, and Development. PL0 DATE Apr 96 NOTE 53p. PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Deans; *Administrator Responsibility; College Administration; *Faculty Workload; *Job Analysis; *Matrices; Models; *Noninstructional Responsibility; Occupational Information; Reduction in Force; Technical Institutes; Two Year Colleges IDENTIFIERS *Milwaukee Area Technical College WI ABSTRACT In response to an anticipated decrease in the number of associate dean positions at Wisconsin's Milwaukee Area Technical College, a model was developed to quantify the workload associated with the administration of an academic division. First, factors affecting the instructional division workload were identified, including the numbers of full- and part-time faculty and staff supervised; sections scheduled and summer school sections offered; campuses and instructional divisions on which the associate dean fvnctions as immediate supervisor; budget cost centers, programs, specialized facilities and production services, and evening centers and off-site contracted facilities managed; and grants written or managed. Next, the factors were weighted, with one unit of workload being defined as the amount of work associated with the supervision of one f time faculty member, and incorporated into the model. After collecting data, a matrix was developed to summarize the data and to provide a vehicle by which workloads of individual academic administrators could be calculated and condensed into a summary by academic division. Includes the associate dean workload matrix, a matrix developed with two fewer associate deans, a modified workload matrix including only major instructional divisions, and the modified matrix with two fewer associate deans. (TGI) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 396 799 JC 960 426

AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, KeithTITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload

Matrix.TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area Technical Coll., WI. De. of

Research, Planning, and Development.PL0 DATE Apr 96NOTE 53p.

PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) Reports Descriptive (141)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Academic Deans; *Administrator Responsibility;

College Administration; *Faculty Workload; *JobAnalysis; *Matrices; Models; *NoninstructionalResponsibility; Occupational Information; Reductionin Force; Technical Institutes; Two Year Colleges

IDENTIFIERS *Milwaukee Area Technical College WI

ABSTRACTIn response to an anticipated decrease in the number

of associate dean positions at Wisconsin's Milwaukee Area TechnicalCollege, a model was developed to quantify the workload associatedwith the administration of an academic division. First, factorsaffecting the instructional division workload were identified,including the numbers of full- and part-time faculty and staffsupervised; sections scheduled and summer school sections offered;campuses and instructional divisions on which the associate deanfvnctions as immediate supervisor; budget cost centers, programs,specialized facilities and production services, and evening centersand off-site contracted facilities managed; and grants written ormanaged. Next, the factors were weighted, with one unit of workloadbeing defined as the amount of work associated with the supervisionof one f time faculty member, and incorporated into the model.After collecting data, a matrix was developed to summarize the dataand to provide a vehicle by which workloads of individual academicadministrators could be calculated and condensed into a summary byacademic division. Includes the associate dean workload matrix, amatrix developed with two fewer associate deans, a modified workloadmatrix including only major instructional divisions, and the modifiedmatrix with two fewer associate deans. (TGI)

***********************************************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

***********************************************************************

Page 2: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

U S

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

ED

UC

AT

ION

Offi

ce o

l Edu

calio

nal F

lose

amh

and

Impr

ovem

ont

ED

UC

AT

ION

AL

RE

SO

UR

CE

S IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

,y(

Thi

s do

cum

CE

NT

ER

(E

RIC

)en

t has

bee

n re

prod

uced

as

rece

ived

from

the

pers

on o

r or

gani

zatio

nor

igin

atin

g it

0 M

inor

cha

nges

hav

e be

en m

ade

toim

prov

e re

prod

uctio

n qu

ality

Poi

nts

of v

iew

or

opin

ions

sta

ted

in th

isdo

cum

ent d

o no

t nec

essa

rily

repr

esen

tol

ficia

l OE

RI p

ositi

on o

r po

licy

Milw

auke

e A

rea

Tec

hnic

al C

olle

y

AC

AD

EM

IC A

DM

INIS

TR

AT

ION

DIV

ISIO

NA

L W

OR

KLO

AD

MA

TR

IX

Apr

il 19

96

Pre

pare

d by

:R

icha

rd N

eum

ann,

Cam

pus

Dea

nK

eith

Rob

erts

, Dire

ctor

of R

esea

rch,

Pla

nnin

g, a

nd D

evel

opm

ent

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

PE

RM

ISS

ION

TO

RE

PR

OD

UC

E A

ND

DIS

SE

MIN

AT

E T

HIS

MA

TE

RIA

LH

AS

BE

EN

GR

AN

TE

D B

Y

K. J

. Rob

erts

TO

TH

E E

DU

CA

TIO

NA

L R

ES

OU

RC

ES

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N C

EN

TE

R (

ER

IC)

Page 3: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Aca

dem

ic W

orkl

oad

Com

mitt

ee

Mar

ietta

Adv

incu

la, D

ean

Akr

am D

akw

ar, I

nstr

uctio

nal C

hair

Rob

ert H

eem

an, A

ssoc

iate

Dea

nT

ed J

oyce

, Ins

truc

tiona

l Cha

irC

hery

l May

es, D

ean

Ric

hard

Neu

man

n, C

ampu

s D

ean

Kei

th R

ober

ts, D

irect

orD

av'd

Tur

ner,

Ass

ocia

te D

ean

Pau

la W

asie

lew

ski,

Ass

ocia

te D

ean

MA

TC

is a

n A

ffirm

ativ

e A

ctio

n/E

qual

Opp

ortu

nity

inst

itutio

n an

d co

mpi

tee

with

MI r

equi

rem

ents

of t

he A

rmor

ies'

', W

M M

ulti

Rie

s A

ct

Page 4: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

BA

CK

GR

OU

ND

An

agen

da it

em a

t the

Dec

embe

r 15

, 199

5, m

eetin

g of

the

Cou

ncil

ofD

eans

at t

he M

ilwau

kee

Are

a T

echn

ical

Col

lege

(M

AT

C)

was

the

allo

catio

nof

ass

ocia

te d

eans

acr

oss

the

inst

ruct

iona

l div

isio

ns o

f the

col

lege

. Thi

sw

as a

n is

sue

of s

igni

fican

t im

port

ance

bec

ause

the

MA

TC

Boa

rd o

fT

rust

ees

had

rece

ntly

ann

ounc

ed th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f an

early

ret

irem

ent

bene

fit fo

r no

nrep

rese

nted

sta

ff of

the

colle

ge, a

nd th

e bo

ard

had

obta

ined

,fr

om th

e pr

esid

ent,

a pl

edge

that

onl

y on

e-ha

lf of

all

posi

tions

vac

ated

wou

ld b

e re

-fill

ed. I

t was

ther

efor

e an

ticip

ated

that

the

num

ber

of a

ssoc

iate

dean

pos

ition

s w

as a

bout

to d

ecre

ase,

and

, acc

ordi

ngly

, the

equ

itabl

edi

strib

utio

n of

the

dim

inis

hed

pool

of a

cade

mic

adm

inis

trat

ors

was

an

issu

eof

sig

nific

ant c

once

rn to

the

dean

s.

Sho

rtly

afte

r be

ginn

ing

to id

entif

y th

e cr

iteria

that

wou

ld b

e pa

rt o

f any

dist

ribut

ion

mod

el, t

he c

ounc

il re

ache

d th

e co

nclu

sion

that

the

tota

l am

ount

of a

cade

mic

adm

inis

trat

ion

wor

kloa

d, n

ot ju

st th

at p

rovi

ded

by th

eas

soci

ate

dean

s, n

eede

d to

be

cons

ider

ed in

any

suc

h m

odel

. Acc

ordi

ngly

,in

add

ition

to th

e as

soci

ate

dean

s' p

ositi

ons,

the

mod

el n

eede

d to

con

side

rth

e fu

ll-tim

e-eq

uiva

lent

wor

kloa

d of

facu

lty w

ho w

ere

assi

gned

aca

dem

icad

min

istr

ativ

e du

ties

as a

por

tion

of th

eir

full-

time

assi

gnm

ent,

e.g.

inst

ruct

iona

l cha

irs, d

epar

tmen

t cha

irs, c

ampu

s ch

airs

, etc

.

The

abo

ve c

oncl

usio

n le

d to

the

real

izat

ion

that

muc

h ad

ditio

nal d

ata

wer

ene

cess

ary

to e

ffect

ivel

y ad

dres

s th

e is

sue,

and

that

add

ition

al r

esea

rch

and

asse

ssm

ent b

eyon

d th

e sc

ope

of o

ne m

eetin

g ne

eded

to b

e un

dert

aken

inor

der

to d

evel

op a

sat

isfa

ctor

y di

strib

utio

n m

odel

. The

cou

ncil,

ther

efor

e,es

tabl

ishe

d a

com

mitt

ee o

f fou

r of

its

mem

bers

to id

entif

y a

stra

tegy

for

dete

rmin

ing

the

allo

catio

n of

ass

ocia

te d

eans

and

oth

er a

cade

mic

adm

inis

trat

ive

assi

gnm

ents

acr

oss

the

inst

ruct

iona

l div

isio

ns.

Wha

t fol

low

s is

an

acco

untin

g of

how

the

com

mitt

ee p

roce

eded

, and

the

resu

lts it

ach

ieve

d.

CO

MM

ITT

EE

PR

OC

EE

DIN

GS

At i

ts in

itial

mee

ting,

the

com

mitt

ee d

efin

ed it

s ch

arge

to b

e as

follo

ws:

1. Id

entif

y th

e to

tal a

dmin

istr

ativ

e lo

ad w

ithin

eac

h in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ion,

i.e.,

FT

E lo

ad o

f ass

ocia

te d

eans

, ins

truc

tiona

l cha

irs, c

ampu

s ch

airs

,et

c.

2. Id

entif

y a

stra

tegy

for,

and

a s

et o

f crit

eria

for,

det

erm

inin

g th

e eq

uita

ble

dist

ribut

ion

of a

dmin

istr

ativ

e lo

ad a

cros

s th

e in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ions

of

MA

TC

.

Als

o at

its

initi

al m

eetin

g, th

e co

mm

ittee

agr

eed

to e

xpan

d its

mem

bers

hip

toin

clud

e re

pres

enta

tives

from

the

pool

of a

ssoc

iate

dea

ns, i

nstr

uctio

nal c

hairs

,ca

mpu

s ch

airs

, etc

., an

d fr

om e

ach

inst

ruct

iona

l div

isio

n an

d ca

mpu

s ef

the

colle

ge.

The

goa

l of t

he c

omm

ittee

was

to d

evel

op a

mod

el w

hich

wou

ld q

uant

ify th

ew

orkl

oad

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n of

an

acad

emic

div

isio

n. T

han,

the

pool

of a

vaila

ble

FT

E a

cade

mic

adm

inis

trat

ors

coul

d be

spr

ead

prop

ortio

nate

lyac

ross

the

divi

sion

s ac

cord

ing

to e

ach

divi

sion

's p

ortio

n of

the

tota

l wor

kloa

d.T

owar

d th

at e

nd, t

he c

omm

ittee

set

out

to id

entif

y in

depe

nden

t and

quan

tifia

ble

fact

ors

whi

ch c

ontr

ibut

ed to

the

wor

kloa

d of

an

acad

emic

adm

inis

trat

or. W

hat f

ollo

ws

is th

e se

t of f

acto

rs w

hich

the

com

mitt

ee fi

nally

agre

ed u

pon.

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

1

Page 5: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

IND

EP

EN

DE

NT

FA

CT

OR

S A

FF

EC

TIN

G IN

ST

RU

CT

ION

AL

DIV

ISIO

N W

OR

KLO

AD

1.T

he n

umbe

r of

full-

time

facu

lty s

uper

vise

d.

2.T

he n

umbe

r of

par

t-tim

e 4e

culty

(da

y, e

veni

ng, w

eeke

nd, a

ltern

ate

deliv

ery)

sup

ervi

sed.

3.T

he n

umbe

r an

d fr

eque

ncy

of s

ectio

ns s

ched

uled

Sem

este

rs 1

and

2.

Leve

l 1 -

400

s an

d 60

0s

Leve

l 2 -

all

othe

rs

4.T

he n

umtn

; of S

umm

er S

choo

l sec

tions

offe

red.

5.T

he n

umbe

r of

bud

get c

ost c

ente

rs m

anag

ed.

6.T

he n

umbe

r of

full-

time

staf

f, cl

eric

al, p

arap

rofe

ssio

nal,

etc.

, sup

er-

vise

d.

7.T

he n

umbe

r of

par

t-tim

e st

aff,

cler

ical

, par

apro

fess

iona

l, et

c., s

uper

-vi

sed.

8.T

he n

umbe

r of

pro

gram

s m

anag

ed.

Leve

l 1 -

accr

edite

d, li

cens

ed, o

r ce

rtifi

ed b

y ex

tern

al a

genc

ies,

or r

equi

ring

freq

uent

sta

te o

r ot

her

requ

ired

repo

rts.

Leve

l 2 -

all o

ther

s

9.T

he n

umbe

r of

cam

puse

s on

whi

ch a

n as

soci

ate

dean

func

tions

as

imm

edia

te s

uper

viso

r of

facu

lty/s

taff.

10.

The

num

ber

of in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ions

in w

hich

an

asso

ciat

e de

an fu

nc-

tions

as

imm

edia

te s

uper

viso

r of

facu

lty/s

taff.

11. T

he n

umbe

r/na

ture

of "

prod

uctio

n so

rnic

es"

man

aged

.

12. T

he n

umbe

r/na

ture

of s

peci

aliz

ed fa

cilit

ies

(labs

, sho

ps, e

tc.)

man

aged

.

Leve

l 1 -

com

pute

r/m

ulti-

med

ia/h

igh-

tech

-inst

rum

ent

depe

nden

tla

bs, "

high

-mai

nten

ance

" la

bs, l

abs

gene

ratin

g ha

zard

ous

was

te, l

abs

with

out p

are

supp

ort,

etc.

Leve

l 2 -

all o

ther

s

13. T

he n

umbe

r of

off-

site

con

trac

ted

faci

litie

s m

anag

ed, e

.g.,

clin

ical

site

s,C

BO

s, J

ob C

ente

rs, e

tc.

14. N

umbe

r of

gra

nts

writ

ten/

man

aged

.

15. N

umbe

r of

eve

ning

cen

ters

at w

hich

facu

lty a

re s

uper

vise

d.

2

Page 6: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

As

a ne

xt s

tep,

the

com

mitt

ee s

et o

ut to

"w

eigh

t" th

e fa

ctor

s so

that

the

rela

tive

wor

kloa

d co

ntrib

uted

by

each

of t

he fa

ctor

s co

uld

be in

corp

orat

edin

to th

e m

odel

. As

a co

mm

on u

nit o

f wor

kloa

d, th

e co

mm

ittee

set

tled

on,

".. t

he a

mou

nt o

f wor

k as

soci

ated

with

the

supe

rvis

ion

of o

ne fu

ll-tim

efa

culty

mem

ber.

" T

he w

orkl

oad

asso

ciat

ed w

ith a

uni

t of e

ach

of th

e ot

her

fact

ors

was

then

est

ablis

h by

con

sens

us o

f the

com

mitt

ee m

embe

rs. T

hew

eigh

ts fo

r th

e fa

ctor

s w

ere

dete

rmin

ed to

be

as fo

llow

s:

FA

CT

OR

WE

IGH

T

Fac

ulty

Ful

l-Tim

e1.

00 (

by d

efin

ition

)F

acul

ty P

art-

Tim

e1.

20S

ectio

ns 4

00's

& 6

00's

0.10

Sec

tions

Oth

ers

0.07

Sec

tions

Sum

mer

0.11

Cos

t Cen

ters

2.50

Sta

ff F

ull-T

ime

0.85

Sta

ff P

art-

Tim

e0.

75P

rogr

ams

Acc

redi

ted,

etc

.4.

50P

rogr

ams

Oth

ers

3.50

Cam

puse

s S

uper

vise

d4.

00D

ivis

ions

Sup

ervi

sed

4.00

Pro

duct

ion

Ser

vice

s S

uper

vise

d4.

80S

peci

aliz

ed H

igh

Mai

nt. F

acili

ties

3.20

Oth

er F

acili

ties

1.00

Off-

site

Fac

ilitie

s0.

50G

rant

s M

anag

ed5.

70E

veni

ng C

ente

rs w

/facu

lty s

uprv

.2.

90

Nex

t, da

ta g

athe

ring

had

to b

e do

ne to

det

erm

ine

the

num

bers

ass

ocia

ted

with

eac

h of

the

wor

kloa

d fa

ctor

s fo

r ea

ch o

f the

aca

dem

ic a

dmin

istr

ator

s.S

ome

of th

e da

ta w

ere

read

ily a

vaila

ble

from

the

Sch

edul

ing

and

Pro

gram

min

g, H

uman

Res

ourc

es, a

nd F

isca

l Affa

irs d

atab

ases

of t

heco

llege

, e.g

., fa

culty

/sta

ff su

perv

ised

, num

ber

of s

ectio

ns, n

umbe

r of

cos

tce

ntas

, etc

. Oth

er d

ata

wer

e co

llect

ed b

y a

surv

ey o

f the

adm

inis

trat

ors

them

selv

es, e

.g.,

prog

ram

s su

perv

ised

, fac

ilitie

s su

perv

ised

, ser

vice

ssu

perv

ised

, etc

.

iO

Fin

ally

, a s

prea

dshe

et w

as d

evel

oped

to s

umm

ariz

e th

e da

ta w

hich

had

bee

nco

llect

ed, a

nd to

pro

vide

the

vehi

cle

by w

hich

wor

kloa

ds o

f ind

ivid

ual a

cade

mic

adm

inis

trat

ors

coul

d be

cal

cula

ted

and

cond

ense

d in

to a

sum

mar

y by

aca

dem

icdi

visi

on. T

he in

divi

dual

wor

kloa

ds w

ere

quan

tifie

d by

sum

min

g th

e pr

oduc

tsof

the

num

ber

asso

ciat

ed w

ith e

ach

wor

kloa

d fa

ctor

and

the

"wei

ght"

ass

igne

dto

that

fact

or. T

he in

divi

dual

sum

s w

ere

com

bine

d, b

y di

visi

on, t

o pr

ovid

ein

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ion

tota

ls.

ii3

Page 7: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

RE

SU

LTS

The

res

ults

of t

he c

omm

ittee

's e

ffort

sar

e fo

und

in th

e m

atric

es w

hich

follo

w. T

he s

prea

dshe

et s

oftw

are

allo

ws

the

prop

ortio

n of

wor

kloa

d to

be

calc

ulat

ed fo

r ea

ch d

ivis

ion,

and

with

that

and

the

num

ber

of F

TE

adm

inis

trat

ive

posi

tions

ava

ilabl

e, it

will

cal

cula

tean

equ

itabl

e di

strib

utio

nof

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

pool

.

The

mat

rices

sta

rtin

g on

pag

e 7

sum

mar

ize

the

cond

ition

sas

of O

ctob

er 1

,19

95, w

hich

is th

e da

te th

e co

mm

ittee

est

ablis

hed

as th

e "d

ate-

of-r

ecor

d"fo

r al

l dat

a co

llect

ed. T

he th

ree

colu

mns

at t

heex

trem

e rig

ht r

evea

l tha

tth

ere

is c

onsi

dera

ble

agre

emen

t bet

wee

n th

e ac

tual

dist

ribut

ion

ofad

min

istr

ativ

e lo

ad, "

Adm

in. F

TE

Ass

igne

d,"

and

the

dist

ribut

ion

calc

ulat

edby

the

mod

el, "

Adm

in. F

TE

Cal

e."

The

sm

all d

iffer

ence

s w

hich

appe

ar in

the

far

right

col

umn

wer

e vi

ewed

by

the

com

mitt

eeas

an

indi

catio

n of

the

valid

ity o

f the

mod

el a

nd c

ontr

ibut

ed to

a re

lativ

ely

high

"co

mfo

rt le

ver

with

the

resu

lts o

f the

com

mitt

ee's

effo

rts.

The

wor

kloa

d m

atrix

is c

onst

ruct

ed s

uch

that

as th

e da

ta e

lem

ents

am

varie

d, th

e pr

opor

tion

of w

orkl

oad

per

inst

ruct

iona

l div

isio

nw

ill v

ary,

and

the

resu

ltant

dis

trib

utio

n of

a c

onst

ant n

umbe

r of

FT

E a

dmin

istr

ativ

epo

sitio

ns w

ill b

e al

tere

d.

On

the

othe

r ha

nd, i

f the

num

ber

of F

TE

adm

inis

trat

ive

posi

tions

is v

arie

d,th

e m

odel

will

als

o re

-dis

trib

ute

the

avai

labl

e po

olac

cord

ing

to th

epr

opor

tion

of w

orkl

oad

dete

rmin

ed fo

r ea

ch in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ion.

Thi

sal

low

s th

e m

odel

to b

e us

ed to

asse

ss th

e af

fect

of a

lterin

g ei

ther

the

num

ber

of a

ssoc

iate

dea

n po

sitio

ns, o

r th

e su

pple

men

tal a

dmin

istr

ativ

e lo

adm

ade

avai

labl

e to

the

inst

ruct

iona

l div

isio

ns.

Sev

eral

exa

mpl

es o

f thi

sca

pabi

lity

of th

e m

odel

are

pro

vide

d in

the

sam

ple

mat

rices

whi

ch a

re p

art

of th

is d

ocum

ent.

12

MO

DE

L M

AIN

TE

NA

NC

E

Mai

nten

ance

of t

he in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ion

wor

kloa

d m

odel

is d

epen

dent

,pr

imar

ily, u

pon

an a

nnua

l rw

visi

on .o

f the

wor

kloa

d fa

ctor

dat

abas

e.If

this

isdo

ne e

ach

fall,

the

mod

el w

ill c

ontin

ue to

equ

itabl

y di

strib

ute

the

adm

inis

trat

ive

wor

kloa

d as

it e

xist

s at

the

time.

Eac

h th

ree

or fo

ur y

ears

, the

wor

kloa

dfa

ctor

s an

d th

eir

resp

ectiv

e w

eigh

ts s

houl

d be

ass

esse

d;ho

wev

er, c

autio

nsh

ould

be

exer

cise

d so

that

nei

ther

the

fact

ors

nor

thei

r w

eigh

ts a

rem

anip

ulat

ed to

pro

vide

unf

air

adva

ntag

e to

one

divi

sion

ove

r th

e ot

hers

.

INT

ER

PR

ET

AT

ION

The

orig

inal

wor

k of

the

com

mitt

ee in

clud

ed th

e w

orkl

oads

of th

e in

stru

ctio

nal

divi

sion

s (B

usin

ess

and

Gra

phic

Art

s, C

olle

ge T

rans

ition

,C

onsu

mer

and

Hos

pita

lity

Ser

vice

s, H

ealth

Occ

upat

ions

, Lib

eral

Art

san

d S

cien

ces,

and

Tec

hnic

al a

nd In

dust

rial)

and

the

acad

emic

adm

inis

trat

ive

load

ass

igne

d to

the

Wor

kfor

ce D

evel

opm

ent I

nc:t

rte

(WD

I), S

tude

nt S

ervi

ces,

Inst

ruct

iona

l Des

ign,

TV

, and

the

exec

utiv

e vi

ce p

resi

dent

. The

mat

rices

on p

age

7 an

d pa

ge 1

1in

clud

e al

l of t

hese

var

iabl

es.

An

addi

tiona

l set

of m

atric

es w

ere

deve

lope

d w

hich

incl

uded

onl

y th

ew

orkl

oads

of t

he in

stru

ctio

nal d

ivis

ions

. The

sear

e in

clud

ed in

the

Mod

died

Wor

kloa

d M

atrix

sec

tion

star

ting

onpa

ge 1

4.

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

LE

134

Page 8: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

SO

UR

CE

S O

F M

AT

RIX

DA

TA

The

info

rmat

ion

used

to d

evel

op te

m m

atrix

was

gat

here

d by

the

Offi

ce o

fR

esea

rch,

Pla

nnin

g, a

nd D

evel

opm

ent f

rom

the

follo

win

g so

urce

s:

1. A

ssoc

iate

Dea

ns: O

ffice

of t

he D

eans

.

2. F

acul

ty A

ssig

ned

to A

dmin

istr

ativ

e D

utie

s: O

ffice

of t

he D

eans

.

3. F

ull-T

ime

and

Par

t-T

ime

Fac

ulty

: Adm

inis

trat

ive

Not

ices

96-

1, 9

6-2,

96-3

.

4. S

ectio

ns/4

00 a

nd 6

00: S

ectio

n E

nrol

lmen

t Rep

ort.

5. S

ectio

ns/O

ther

s: S

ectio

n E

nrol

lmen

t Rep

ort.

6. S

ectio

ns/S

umm

er: S

ectio

n E

nrol

lmen

t Rep

ort.

7. C

ost C

ente

rs: B

udge

t Offi

ce.

8. S

taff/

Ful

l-Tim

e: H

uman

Res

ourc

es O

ffice

.

9. S

taff/

Par

t-T

ime:

Hum

an R

esou

rces

Offi

ce.

10. P

rogr

ams/

Acc

redi

ted:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

11. P

rogr

ams/

Oth

er: A

ssoc

iate

Dea

ns' S

urve

y.

12. C

ampu

ses

Sup

ervi

sed:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

13. D

ivis

ions

Sup

ervi

sed:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

14. P

rodu

ctio

n S

ervi

ces:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

15. S

peci

aliz

ed fa

cilit

ies:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

16. O

ther

Fac

ilitie

s: A

ssoc

iate

Dea

ns' S

urve

y.

14

17. O

ff-S

ite F

acili

ties:

Ass

ocia

te D

eans

' Sur

vey.

18. G

rant

s M

anag

ed: G

rant

s O

ffice

19. E

veni

ng C

ente

rs: A

ssoc

iate

Dea

ns' S

urve

y. lb

Page 9: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

lb

AS

SO

CIA

TE

DE

AN

WO

RK

LOA

D M

AT

RIX

AS

IT E

XIS

TS

CU

RR

EN

TLY

17

Page 10: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

. -

1.11ea213111111.11111

13-vnist

11-business

IP

AO /Ulm0111E3111.001

1.001

aln=31111E "13-north

B-southNanBUSINESSWT SUM

admin totalT-HS MationsT-basic skills

1.0011.001

ION

19

MIND2320

5.001 41

1.001 23

0.1Secbon' s

400690530

28

25 0

4.001 1.51

CHS-Snorth 0.25! 1

CHS-1CHS-2CHS-%westCONSUMERWr SUM

admin total

H-alliedH-other

291142

170.4

0.751

HEALTHWT SUM

LAS-Snorth

1.001

1.001

1

LAS-math & sosmath

LAS-vim(

1 I

172

I

111111111

28

IMMOMOP

12

1

0

0

0.07SectionsOthers

19957

11.1A

.- .214

73.15

$5

. .

0.1 1

Sections

77

35

17

15.18

2.5Cost

Centers

0.85Staff

Fulltim.0

olaStarr

Paittims0

4.51=1MTIMAccredited

0

3.5

Other2

4CampusesELF,"Ell=

1

4Division.

2

2865 28.9

o000

12.75

139.75

96.75

4o72

58.5

3

2o

522.5

1

51

731.5

38

0525

49

0

o2

27

41

16

26

25

1

1

1

1

520

1

1

0

28

21

25

201

1

1

1

1

1

1

824

1

1

1

312

1

i24

16

1

1

115 56

o240145

16601

42.07

o403418

14816.28

3075

4739.95

1311.05

0

10.2

451141

6177

29720.79

332

1348

5.2827

67.5

10778..

17...

11.55

0224

3011351

17108207

2110

1

0

1$12

41

1$

1

a

1

123

47

31

30

0

20

0

3

1

35

2

0

1

1

t

12

3t

1

1

34

$9.11.1111.11E0115

4.8PnxkrctionServicas

314.4

01

1

4.8

48

38.4

1

00

32Er=Facilities

3

10

9

37

2

0

25.6

2727

1857.6

57

1

1$57.6

0

40

6

1

1

000

1

1

0

1

0

1

26

3

00

00

1

34

111

3

Facilities

Page 11: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

101111111111111111113111111111 11111111111111

11111111111111d11111111111111111111111111111

111111111111111111111111111111111011011111111140111111011111111011111111111

111111111111111111111111111111li 11111111111111

I 111110111101111111i IdlIllIllI

iamommammmm NEEiiIIiIIiIIIIhIIIhIIiiIiiiIhIii111111111111 Mil 11 OEM

Mil 11

111111 11 III I I II 111111111111 1111111 1 1 1 1 111111

MUM 11 111

III 11111 1111 INN 111111111

11111111111101k III 11111011111111111

11111111d NM III 061111111111111

11111111111111111111 1110111111111111d

1104111 111111 MI 111111

iiIIIIüiIiBM 1 NMI IN I 1 111111111

I I 1 111111111

Id NMI NI" I I 1 11111 III

INEE""iiik 1E11

Ill 111

Iii

Page 12: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

111111313121113131111111111111111111

1111131111111111111111111011011

1111111111101111111111

Mil ANEWMilinididifid10011010111Midli ANNIIIIIUCIIdI

111112INEMBEININ

11101111111111 I 11111111

IIIIHNIMEN 1111111 -111111

Mk Id UM MINIM11411 1111111111

111111111111111 I I MEMORIN NI 111 di IMMO11111111ffilin b I 11111011101101111111 111

1 II 1 1 MNMIENI 111111 I -1 1111111

II I 11-11 11 Ili11.

I MUM

Page 13: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

AS

SO

CIA

TE

DE

AN

WO

RK

LOA

D M

AT

RIX

WIT

H T

WO

FE

WE

R A

SS

OC

IAT

E D

EA

NS

25

2410

Page 14: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

2

49

1

MOMASSOCIATE DEAN WORKLOAD MATRIX

IlL"131111111111111111111111GE111031111=71111=71

NMI

1 1.2

&west13-busineu

13-north

BeathDeanBUSINESSWT SUM

T-HS relationsskills

it==311111I-adult HSIi=1:=1.11

ESLTRANSITIONWT SUM

admin totalCHS-%northCHS-1CHS-2CHS-%westCONSUMER

1.001.00

1.001.00MI=

Full4ime1936282320

126126

5.00 41

1.00 I

1 .00 I

Part-time61311861

0.1Sections4001600

30

2839

0.07SecOoneOthers

19957

111236

230

25

1.001 271.00 I 4

03949

142

4

000

4

85115

0240

4.001 1.51

0.251 1 8

14516

60142.07

13815.18

26 34 1712.75

4.5

IM"MAccredited

04072

1358.5

3.5Programs

Other20525

14

4CAlTiptalle

4Dsion;ar=arl=

1

1

1

1

520

21

1

1

1

624

4.8ProductionServices

001

1

1

314.4

32

Facilities31

10149

37118.4

0.5Other

5.7 2.9Oft-Site

Facilities

1

Facilities00

Gnats='!"A

E="1=1Centers

000

030

200

Total

Admin.FTE

Admin.FTE

Eitiall=2:1GE123

111

1 3 8

560

403418

14816.28

3 0

20

0

1

1

0

7547

39.9513

9.75

1.00 1

1.0010.751

1

1

171611

45114

13 51

52WT SUM 52

admin total

H-otherH-%weetHEALTH

I

be

IS

1.0010.251

172

108104196

6133

277 13

297129.61 19.6 20.79

31420

2

01200

10774113

17

WT SUMadmin total

Dean

soc actLAS-%northLAScommunicat

mathLAS-west

SI

0.751

ION

115

41.81 1.2

1

3224

13

00

26511.55

351

0

2471

0

00

11

30

/17

104

226

485.28

211012

1

44

30

34

0 0

18 1210.2

1612

5 222.5 7

11 45

731.5

3

41

16

0

0

3

1

38

28

1

1

1

0 2 0

01

60

1

1.5

0

45.6 31.9

3

$115.58 a.

4/.71

01

25

21

312

1

1

2 25

281

1

201

1

8

1

312

1

1

4.8

1

34

41

16

1

1

1

3

1

838.4

1

1

2727

1857.6

5751

57.6

0

1

1

0

2813

22125 4 2t 1

2 9

611.2512% 5.52

61

7318

3 501212

15075

50

472.8

0 263

22

5.811%

5.175.17

5.5

5.5

0 138

1

25

0

5.700

0

151.8912%

5.505.50 1.25

0.02

4133

-0.75

1

3

1

00

40

34

00

2

0

1 6

1

3

111 0

7

31

00

51

Page 15: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

113111111111111131INIIIMI111310111111111111

11111111110119111111111111111111111

1111111111ENIN1121111111111111111111111111111111011Mat N1111111111 z

mutodmonimmimiri MIME1111111111111MEMINISIMIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 11111 IllIl

lilliNIIIIIIMINEENIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIMMINEEI iiii 111111111

011iiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiilliliii 11 11111 1

IMMEINIIIMINN Plit 1111101110

1111111111111111 111111 111111111111

MINIUM 1110111011101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

1111111111111 IIIMINIMMINEMINIIiii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI111111111111111illr"11111111111111111111 MI11111111

111111111111111011111111. 111111111111

11111111011110110111111 11N1111111111 ..

MINNIE fp! NIB N1111111111

11111111111111 If" ill -111111111

Page 16: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

0 0

49 20

WORKLOAD MATRIX

Will1111111111111O=11Z701

01111M1

1 1.2

BUSINESSWT SUM

TRANSITIONWT SUM

CONSUMERWT SUM

HEALTHWT SUM

TilWT SUM

W T SUM

WT SUM

STUD SERWT SUM

AO Adm

5.00 4.00

Fulltime Parttime

126

4.00 1.50 62MU=3.001 2.50

II I

lb 1

I I I

11111111

62

5252

90

173

1

7

11%

290.4

142

0.1S et ons4006600

0.07SectionsOthers

9.9

4

104573.15

170.4

108

0.41101

42.07

0.11S ct k sSummer

13815.18

14811.28

2.5Cost

Centers

0.85Staff

Full-time

0.75Staff

4.5 3.5

2665

3428.9

1712.75

1358.5

4Campuses

4Divisions

S. EZ=EZ=14 5

3075

47

196MIND011111111011

46.1

346415.2

79

29720.79

265111.55

44

5

6.6

40.4

0

1.54

14

46.1

5.28

444.64

268

11412.54

9210.12

50.55

67.5

18

20

56140

11

13

12

23

1512.75

13 5 222.5 7

2

624

4.1Pa:ductalSWAIM

314.4

3.2

Pr-777Facilities

37118.4

12

1612

75

23

31.5

1672

31.5

19

26

28

1449

47

520

12

24

13

416

312

936

4.8

38.4

1

4.3

00

25.6

1657.6

1

OthwFa Wit e s

0.5MU*

5.7Giants

2.9

r"-IILL""MCantos

1 31

1

1

1.5

2613

45.1

22125.4

11

31.9

1212

15075

422.11

71.1

25.11

1657.6

1444.1

00

4711

2381

5.700

2826

Teti

91115.511

661.25

0111.67

1156.69

Mmin.FTE

Mmin.FTE

REMIII=M1

1.22 11.00

5.52 5.50 0.02

5.17 5.50 -0.33

5.50 6.25 -0.75

00

1

5.713

37.7 10110.41 6.17

00

00

00

00

3%

0 0 02.25 0 0 0

0

00

00

0

00

00

0

0

00

0

00

00

00

0

0 0

314.4

37118.4

3232

2 317.1

2366.7

00

00

00

0

0

1160.75 616

11.75

11.115

0

00

00

00

521.5

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

202.3

50.41

0 0 150 0 65.5

0.42

0.91

1.66

0.42

1.00

1.60

0.69

00 10016 0.64 2.00

00 0

10 057 0

1% 6% 7% 3%

62.3

1130%

0.1111 0.45 0.24

Page 17: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

32

MO

DIF

IED

WO

RK

LOA

D M

AT

RIX

WO

RK

LOA

D A

S IT

CU

RR

EN

TLY

EX

IST

S

3314

Page 18: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Woddoad Matrix

ASSOCIATE DEAN WORKLOAD MATRIX Modified to include on ma instructional divisions on --self balanci formula

MULE=.AD Adm

1

ZZE111=211.2 0.1

Sections007

Sections0.11 2.5 0.85 0.75 4.5 3.5 4 4 4.8 3.2 1 0.5 5.7 2.9 Admin. Admin.Sections Cost Staff Staff E=112r2=1 Campuses Divisions Production Specialized Other Off-Sits Grants ITW hted FTE FTEAl r=11 Full-time Parttime 400&600 Mem &MIMI' Cntra Fulitime Pad-time Accredited Other Cr=Er= SNVICAls Facilities Facilities FacilitiesLJ Centers Total REITM=mm Ad ustB-west 1.00 19 61 3 199 41

7o0

o0

04

2o

1

1

2

1

0o

31

01

00 4

B-business 1.00 38 31 o 57ra Ice

8-north1.00 26 18 28 111 7 o o 0 5 1 1 1 10 0 0 o1.00 23 61 39 236 35 0 0 7 2 1 1 1 14 0 3 8B-south

Dean1.00 20 71 29 228 31 0 o 2 5 1 1 1 9 0 0 1

BUSINESS0 214 17

126 242 99 1045 138 26 34 17 13 14 5 6 3 37 1 3 8 11WT SUM 126 290.4 9.9 73.15 15.18 95 28.9 12.75 58.5 49 20 24 14.4 118.4 1 1.5 45.6 31.9 985.5819% 8.24 9.00 -0.76

admin total 5.00 4T-HS relationsT-basic

4 85skills 1.00 23 25 0 115 56 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0T-'ob centers

T-adult HS1.001.00

027

o39

00

o240

040

3

2 0 1 1 0 6 1 1 0T-wo laceESL

1.00 4 49 0 145 34 0 2 o 1 1 19 o 25 6862

29142

04

16601

18TRANSITIONWT SUM 62

148 30 47 13 5 2 2 3 1 27 1 26 22 9170.4 0.4 42.07 16.28 75 39.95 9.75 22.5 7 8 12 4.8 86.4 1 13 125.4 28.1 722.05admin total 4.00 1.514% 6.04 5.50 0.54CHS%north 0.25 8 15 29

12

51

45114 33 1 4 2

CHS-1CHS-2

1.00I 1.00

1716

3013

1 11

2

726

975

CHS-%west61 2 5 1 1 1 3 2 1 160.75 11 50 104 77 13 1 3 2 2 4 7 3 50 2

ti-other

Ir 1

1.00

52

20

a

108-

14

239

196! ;

012

00

121.2

29720.79

107786317

26518.55

9

21

10 '

12 01

124.84 I

-

o

16

841

16

51

8-

r

1

1

12

16

1

1

18

1857.6

12

00

00

150 422.8

1

5.7

25.8

0

,

619.6712% 5.18

5.51

5.50 -0.32

r

50263138

236

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Page 19: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

1 IpiliiL ..............., ,, Ill ............ II slim mrdwinglimilii

11111111 111 EININIEINIIIIII 1111 I PI MININIMPINIIIIIIII

1 1111111 1 1 MI WININIIIIIIINN 1 1111"11111111 11111111111111111111111

111111111 III 1111111110111111111111111

1111 II III 111111 II 111111111111111111

1 1 1 111 mpuillsomin I m I III PIO b PIPPIIIIIIIIIIIII II 1111 II INIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111101

11 11111 1 1 11111111111111111111PININIII

1 111111111 1 IP 111111111111111111111 Iii I III 11111 1111111111111111111

11111 11 III 1 11110111111111 111111

yob 1 111 111 mmummil 1 Nip 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIMMII 111111

11114111111 I! 811111111111111111111111111

MEI I MINIM! IIIIIIMEIMIll lig LAI 11111119111111111111

Page 20: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Woddoed Matrix

II .1

1We htAim

1.2 0.1 0.07 0.11 0.85 0.75 4.5 3.5 4 4.8 3.2 1 0.5 5.7AD

2.9 Admin. kin*.

* Full-timeSections4001600

Sections Sections -

CentersStaff

Foil-timeStaff

Pret-timeGrzmirmfirmAccredited Other Su

-

sedDivisionsElf.= Production Specialized Otiw Off-Site Grants 1=1 Wei hted

TotalFTE FTE

Others Sumnw Services Facilities Facilities FaciiitiesIZ:= Centers (Calc Ass nod Ad ust

BUSINESS 5.00 4.00 126 242290.4

999.0

104573.15

13815.18

26 :4 17 13 14 5 6 3 37 1 3WT SUM :

8 11

65 28 9 12.75 58.5 49 20 24 14.4 118.4 1 1.5 45.6 31.9 985.58 8.24 9.00 .0.76

1.50 62 4 601 148 30 47 13 5 2 2 3 1 27 1 22 9

1

62

129.6

0.4 42.07 16.28 75 39.95 9.75 22.5 7 a 12 4.8 86.4 1 13 125.4 26.1 722.05 6.04 5.50

52196 297 4$ 27 13 9 7 8 5 4 a 12 150 4 2

19.6 20.79 5.28 67.5 11.05 6.75 31.5 28 20 16 12 75 22.1 619.67 5.18 5.50 -0.32

: -

liE .e I

re .

265 44 1845

12 3

9

1

4.813

57.600

28

476238

0

1

5.790 39 12 16 a90 46.8 1.2 18 55 4.84 10.2 72 28

14

12

6

658.69 5.51 6.25

1

.0.74

173 346 30 1234 268 20 23 75 7173 415.2 3.9 86.38 29.48 50 19.55

23 1985,5

49 24 36 0 44.$ 28 0 5.7

23

0.36

863 114 56 15 13 6 3 37 32 2 3115 175 262115 210 26.2 60.41 12.54 140 12.75 17.25 164.5 24 14.4 118.4 32 1 17.1 66.7 1169.75

612 4305301.35

16.9 618 1052 76083.6

144 153 67301.5

93 34 31 74 657 39 581262.4 61.21 325.5 136 483.2 74 328.5 222.3 168.2 5246.2

1

17

Page 21: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

40

MO

DIF

IED

WO

RK

LOA

D M

AT

RIX

TW

O.F

EW

ER

AS

SO

CIA

TE

DE

AN

S

4118

Page 22: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Woridoad Matrix

ASSOCIATE DEAN WORKLOAD MATRIX Modified to include on instructional dMsions on ba - formula

=MIENAD Acim

1 1.2 0.1 0.07 0.11 2.5 0.85 0.75 4.5 3.5 4 4 4.8 3.2 1 0.5 5.7 2.9 Admin. Admin.

Facu Sactions Sections Sections Cott Staff Staff 11==:11G=111E2= Divisions Production S. lized Other Off-Slte Grants 13=1,==3 FTE

IEZIIII=MMMFTE

II Full-time19

rt-time61

400,16003

Others199

Summer41

Centers Full-timeo

Part-timeo

Accraditedo

Other2Er=r2r=

1 2Services

0Facilities

3- - - FacIlltesLJ

B-west 1.00

Cantos Total0 0

B-busIness 1.00 38 31 0 57 7 0 o 4 o 1 1 0 1 1 o2o

1.00 26 18 28 111 7 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 10 o o o

Bnorth 1.00 23 61 39 236 35 0 0 7 2 1 1 1 14 0 3

B-south

IS

1.00 20 71 29 228 31 0 o 2 5 1 1 1 9 0 0

Dean o 214 17

1

BUSINESS 126 242 99 1045 138 26 34 17 13 14 5 6 3 37 1 3

WT SUM 126 290.4 9.9 73.15 15.18 65 28.9 12.75 58.5 49 20a 11

admin total 5.00 4

24 14.4 118.4 1 1.5 45.6 31.9 985.58

T-HS relations 4 85

19% 7.86 9.00 -1.14

I-basic skills 1.00 23 25 0 115 56 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 0

T oh canters 1.00 0 0 o o 0

3

T-adult HS 1.00 27 39 0 240 40 2 o 1 1 0 6 1 1

1.00

o

4 49 0 145 34 0 2 0 1 1 19 0 25 6

ESL 8 29 o 16 18

TRANSITION 62 142 4 601 148 30 47 13 5 2 2 3 1 27 1 26

WT SUM 62

22 9

170.4 0.4 42.07 16.28 75 39.95 9.75 22.5 7 a 12 4.8 86.4 1 13 125.4 28.1

admin total 4,00 1.5

722.05

CHS-%north 0.25 8 15 29 45

14% 5.76 5.50 0.26

CHS-1 0.00 17 30 12 114 33 1 4 2 1

27

26

975

CHS-2 1.00 16 13 51 61 2 5 1 1 1

.1

3 2 1 16

CHS-%weat 0.75 11 50 104 77 13 1 3 2 2 4 7 3 50

CONSUMER 5252

108 196 297 48 27 13 9 7 a 5 4 a 18 12 150 422

admen total 2.00129.6 19.6 20.79 5.28 - , 31.5 28 20 16 38.4 - 22.8 5.8 619.67

2.5 12% 4.94 4.50 0.44

1.00 51 3 0 107 21 3 25 1 1

5 0 50 0

H-allied 1.00 20 14 12 76 10 8

Hothor 1.00

7 0 283

17 20 0 63 12 0 o 1 1 1 5 0 138

H-%west 0.25 2 2 o 17 1 1 25

HEALTH 90 39 12 265 44 18 12 16 16 8 312 4.6

1857.6

00

476238

1

5.7o

WT SUM 90 48.8 1.2 18.55 4.54 45 10.2 12 72 12 0 658.69

admin total 3.25 3 13% 5.25 6.25 -1.00

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

4243 1 9

Page 23: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

11,11111111111111111111111111111111111111111

1111111111111111111111 111111 111111 IIIII I I

1111111111115111111111111111111111111111111111

11111111111111011111111 iIuIIIIIIIIIuIIIIII

"1"1"1"""1"11"111" 1111111111111111101111111111 HIM I II II I IIIIIIIIiIIIiiIIhIIhIIUidhiIII 11111 111111

I TIMMS11111111111111111111111 1 1 111 11 11

1 11 1111

IIIIIIIIhhiIIIlIIIIIIIIIId MI 1 1111111111 I1111111111111111 i I 11111 111111

ammommu1 mono

1111111111111111011111 I 111111111111111

Immimiimmiggimmudon11111181/11111111111M111111111111111111

1111111111111111111111111111110111111

IiIIIIIiIIIiiIIIIIIIIIIiiidIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIiIIIIIIIIIiIIIdIIII 1111111111111

1111101111111111111111111111111111111

1111111 I I Iill

Page 24: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Woridoad Matrix

- II -

1=7.1.11111 1 1.2 0.1 0.07 0.11 2.5 0.85 0.75 4.5 3.5 4 4 4.8 3.2 1 0.5 5.7 2.9 W hted

Admin. Admin. AD

It Adm Wa'

Fulkime Er222 Sections Sections Sections Cost Staff Staff MIZMIM.= Divisions Production S told Other Off-Site Grants 11=2 FTE FTE

EMI Part-time 4006600 Others Summer Centers Fulkime Part-time Accredited Other Erl= Services Facilities Facilities Facilities = Centers Total [2:311=2:1 Ad ust

BUSINESS 5.00 4.00 126 242 290.4

99 9.9

1045 138 26 34 17 13 14 5 6 3 37 1 3 a WT SUM 126

11 73.15 15.111 65 28.9 12.75 58.5 49 20 24 14.4 118.4 1 1.5 45.9 31.9 985.58 7.86 9.00 -1.14

TRANSITION 4.00 1.50 62 62

142 170.4

4 601 148 30 47 2 2 3 1 27 1 26 22 9

e 2.50

0.4 42.07 16.28 75 39.95 7 8 12 4.8 86.4 1 125.4 28.1 722.05 5.76 5.50 0.26

52 108 196 297 48 13 9 7 a 5 20

4 16

a 38.4

150 4 2 WT SUM 52 129.9 19.6 20.79 5.28 11.05 6.75 31.5 28 75 22.8 5.8 619.67 4.94 4.50 0.44

HEALTH 3.25 3.00 90 39 12 265 44 18 12 16 8 3 3 0 476 1

LIB ARTS

90 46.8 1.2 0

18.55 4.84 45 10.2 12 28 12 12 4.8 57.6 0 238 5.7 0 658.69 5.25 6.25 -1.00

5.75 3.00 173 346 39 1234 268 20 23 75 7 14 6 9 0 14 28 o 173 415.2 3.9 86.38 29.48 50 19.55 56.25 31.5 49 24 36 0 44.8 28 0

1 13 5.7 37.7 1090.46 8.70 8.75 -0.05

Til 5.00 2.85 175 262 863 ' 114 56 15 17.25

-

85.5 47 13 6 3 37 32 2 3 23

WT 210 26.2 60.41 12.54 140 12.75 164.5 52 24 14.4 118.4 32 1 17.1 66.7 1169.75 9.33 7.85 1.48

177 TOTAL 25.00 16.9 618 1052 612 4305 760 153 67 93 34 31 16 151 74 657 39 sa 616 1262.4 61.2 301.35 83.6 442.5 114.75 301.5 325.5 136 124 483.2 74 328.5 222.3 168.2 5248.2

" .

46 47 21

Page 25: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

"Riliallinill11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111

11113 Mill11111111111111111111111111111

11100111111111111111111 111111111

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

11111111111111111111111111111211111111111111

11111111111111111111111111111111111111

IIIIMEMINIMMIN I III1111111111111110111011111111 1111111111

111111111111111111101 1111111111111011

1011111111011111

1 It1161111111111111111111111111

IIiiiiiibIOIIIIIdIIIIi 11111 III 11 1111 1!nu

imiliminsimmipsomII

116111141111111111111111111111111111 II

1111111111111N0111111111

1

Page 26: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Wortdoad Matrix

Dean 0 1 1 oLAS-social 1.00 28 32 o 724 47 o 1 1 1 o 1 o

soc sci 6 24 0 30 .

. o .

LAS-linorth 0.75 13 42 24 135 31 2 3 1 3 0 4 3 oLAScommunicat 1.00

726 35 0 217 30 0 5 1 1 o o 4 oi 1 I

o

read- . 5 oLAS-math & sci 0.00 22 20 o 87 34 0 2 1 1 6 16

math 17 24 o 108o

LASwast 1.00 25 71 11 207 69 3 o 1 1 1 3 oLAS-south 1.00

s20 96 3 226 57 2 3 1 2 0 3 1 o

LIB ARTS 173 348 39 1234 268 20 23 75 7 14 61

WT SUM 173 415.2 3.9 86.38 29.48 50 19.55 56.25 31.5 499 0 14 28 0 1 13

admit" total 4.75 324 36 0 44.8 28 o 5.7 37.7 1090.443

Tdl Dean 4 221% 8.49 7.75 0.74

Ted fire 1.00 3 37 51 23 9 3 o 1 1 oT&I sischic 0.00 20 6 3 83 3 0 11 2 1

1 0 20

T&l-south 1.03 28 42 14 212 24 3 19 1 1

220

124

01

0

T&I ice1

1.00 9 4 44 27 6 5 1 4 1 0 2 1

polio* 0 17 o 25 1

T&l-Milwaukas 1 1.00 20 22 2 151 4 0 16 3 1 3T&I-Milwaukse 2 1.00 14 13 10 48 1 8 0 2 1

57

132

o1

1

north1

12 20 13 7&Ivor* ad 5 12 79 o ss

old distribution 46 28918I 115 175 282 863 114 56 15 23 19 47 13WT SUM 115 210 26.2 60.41 12.54 140 12.75 17.25 85.5 164.5 52

624

314.4

37118.4

3232

21

3 23

admin total 5.00 2.8517.1 66.7 1169.75

22% 9.11 7.45 1.26

TOTAL 618 1052 612 4305 760 177 144 153 67 93 34 31WT SUM 618 1262.4 61.2 301.35 83.6 442.5 122.4 114.75 301.5 325.5

16 151 74 657 39 58

admin total 24.00 18.9136 124 76.8 483.2 74 328.5 222.3 168.2 5246.2

Currant Effort 40.85

50BEST COPY AVAILABLE

51 23

Page 27: Matrix. of - ERICDOCUMENT RESUME ED 396 799 JC 960 426 AUTHOR Neumann, Richard; Roberts, Keith TITLE Academic Administration Divisional Workload. Matrix. TNSTITUTION Milwaukee Area

Woddoed Matrix

WORKLOAD MATRIX

=In=AD

1 12 0.1 0.07 0.11 2.5 0.85 0.75 4.5 3.5 4 4 4.8 3.2 1 0.5 5.7 2.9 Admirt. Minfe.

Adm NM"- i -11=1 Sections Secdons Sections Cost Staff Staff MrrMM,=== Divisions Production= Otherirrr777717Pi=otrat. Grants i=laumFTE FTE

0 =El Fulkime Part-tinur 4008600 Others Summer Centers Fult-timir Piet-time Accredited Other EZ=Mr= Services Facilities Centers Total rMEIMTPMarM

BUSINESS 5.00 4.00 126 242 99 1045 138 26 34 17 13 14 5 6 3 37 1 3 8 11

WT SUM 126 290.4 9.9 73.15 15.18 65 28.9 12.75 58.5 49 20 24 14.4 118.4 1 1.5 45.6 31.9 985.58 7.67 9.00 -1.33

TRANSITION 4.00 1.50 62 142 4 601 148 30 47 13 5 2 2 3 1 27 1 26 22 9

WT SUM 62 170.4 0.4 42.07 18.28 75 39.95 9.75 22.5 7. 8 12 4.8 86.4 . 1 13 125.4 52228.1 722.05 5.50 0.12

CONSUMER 2.00 2.50 5252

108129.6

19619.6

297 48 27 13 9 7 8 5 4 8 18 12 150 4

WI' SUM

2

20.79 5.28 67.5 11.05 6.75 31.5 28 20 18 38.4 57.6 12 75 22.8 5.8 619.67 4.83 4.50 0.33

HEALTH 3.25 3 00 9090

3946.8

121.2

26518.55

44 18 12 16 16 8 3 3 1 18 0 476 1 0

WT SUM 4.84 45 10.2 12 72 28 12 12 4.8 57.6 0 238 5.7 0 658.69 5.13 8.25 -1.12

LIB ARTS 4.75 3.00 173 346415.2

39 1234 268 20 23 75 7 14 6 9 0 14 28 0 1 13

WT SUM 173 3.9 86.38 29.48 50 19.55 56.25 31.5 49 24 38 0 44.8 28 0 5.7 37.7 1090.46 8.49 7.75 0.74

181 5.00 2.85 115 175 262 863 114 56 15 23 19 47 13 6 3 37 32 2 3 23

WT SUM 115 210 26.2 60.41 12.54 140 12.75 17.25 85.5 164.5 52 24 14.4 118.4 32 1 17.1 9.1166.7 1169.75 7.85 1.26

TOTAL 24.00 16.9 618 1052 612 4305 760 177 144 153 67 93 34 31 16 151 74 657 39

WT SUM

58

618 1262.4 61.2 301.35 83.6 442.5 122.4 114.75 301.5 325.5 136 124 76.8 483.2 74 328.5 222.3 168.2 5246.2

Current Effort 40.85

World:ad with AD retirement in C &HS and T & I

Also ential retirement In LA & S

52 5324