math in the news: 9/12/11
DESCRIPTION
In this issue we investigate the U.S. Open to try to explain why it's been so long that Americans have the U.S. Open champs. What does the data reveal?TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
9/12/11
![Page 2: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The U.S. Open• This table shows
country of origin for each of the men’s singles champions from 1970 to 2010. The U.S. winners are highlighted in red.
![Page 3: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The U.S. Open• Let’s change this to
numerical data by assigning a U.S. winner to1 and a non-U.S. winner to -1. This is the revised table.
![Page 4: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The U.S. Open• Create a bar graph
of the data in the table.
• You’ll see that there seems to be a periodic trend in the data for U.S. winner.
![Page 5: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The U.S. Open• Let’s smooth out the
data this way:– If a U.S. winner is not
part of a group of 2 or more, assign its value to -1.
• Here is the revised graph. Now you can see the periodic nature of the U.S. winning streaks.
![Page 6: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The U.S. Open• We can overlay a
sinusoidal curve over this graph to more clearly see the periodic nature of the data set.
• Notice that these sinusoidal curves have different widths.
![Page 7: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The U.S. Open• The period of the
first sine curve is 15 years. The period of the second curve is 12 years. And the period of the third curve is 9 years.
• The average period is 12 years.
![Page 8: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The U.S. Open• We can now
construct a periodic model from the data set.
• A standard sine function has a period of 2π.
![Page 9: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The U.S. Open• To change the period
to 1, multiply the x by 2π.
• This function can be used as the basis for creating a function of period 12, representing the average cycle for U.S. dominance in tennis at the U.S. Open.
![Page 10: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The U.S. Open• This function has a
period of 12.• We now just need to
adjust it so that it is in sync with the periodic nature of our data set.
![Page 11: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The U.S. Open• This is the function
that models the data set, and according to the graph, the U.S. will once again have dominance at the U.S. Open around 2016, and then once again in 2028.
![Page 12: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The U.S. Open• Buy why would
American dominance at the U.S. Open be periodic?
• When there is a dominant player (or players) they have a much higher probability of winning and during their prime, they will have several championships.
![Page 13: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The U.S. Open• Here is the graph
again, this time with actual winners identified.
Jimmy ConnorsJohn McEnroe
Andre AgassiPete Sampras
Andy RoddickPete Sampras
![Page 14: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The U.S. Open• If the trend holds up,
then there is likely to be one or more American players who will become dominant over the next few years.
Jimmy ConnorsJohn McEnroe
Andre AgassiPete Sampras
Andy RoddickPete Sampras
![Page 15: Math in the News: 9/12/11](https://reader037.vdocuments.site/reader037/viewer/2022103000/5564bf73d8b42a3e618b54a9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The U.S. Open• As a final activity,
here is the data for the women’s singles champions over the same period. Perform the same kind of analysis we did with the men’s data. What can you conclude?