maternal and infant health assessment (miha)

21
Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA) Christine Rinki and Mike Curtis Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program Kristen Marchi Center on Social Disparities in Health University of California, San Francisco MCAH Action May 20, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 28-Nov-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Christine Rinki and Mike Curtis

Surveillance, Assessment and Program Development Section Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program

Kristen Marchi

Center on Social Disparities in Health University of California, San Francisco

MCAH Action

May 20, 2015

Page 2: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• Collaborative effort of

– Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Program

– California Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program

– The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

– Genetic Disease Screening Program (GDSP)

Partners

Page 3: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• Annual population-based survey of women with recent live births

• Addresses maternal and infant social and economic conditions, health behaviors, health status and access to care before, during and after a recent pregnancy

• Provides information not available from other sources to develop, target and evaluate public health efforts

• Modeled after the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 40 states

What is the MIHA survey?

Page 4: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• Health status • Chronic conditions • Mental health • Nutrition and food security • Weight • Health insurance • Service utilization • Breastfeeding • Infant sleep

• Pregnancy intention • Family planning • Childhood hardships • Hardships in pregnancy • Intimate partner violence • Social support • Substance use • Income • Demographics

Topics

Page 5: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• Sample from birth certificates for Feb - May births, excluding: – Non-residents – Women < 15 years old – Multiple births > 3

• Designed to represent all women giving birth in calendar year who meet inclusion criteria

• Questionnaire mailed in English and Spanish with telephone follow-up to non-respondents

• ~6,800 women have participated per year since 2010, with a response rate of 69-70%

• Most women complete survey 2 – 7 months postpartum

MIHA methods

Page 6: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• Additional WIC funding expanded the sample to include selected counties and populations in California

– Counties with the most births (2010-2015)

– Women eligible but not enrolled in WIC (2010-2015)

– American Indians/Alaska Natives (2012-2015)

– African Americans (since 1999)

• Increased sample size improved our ability to report local data for counties with the most births

• MIHA includes enough women from each group to report their information separately

Sample design

Page 7: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA regions, before 2010

Page 8: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA data availability, 2010-2012 births

Top 20 Birthing Counties % of resident women with a live birth in 2011

• Los Angeles ………………….. • San Diego …………………….. • Orange ………………………… • Riverside ……………………… • San Bernardino………………. • Santa Clara …………………… • Sacramento …………………... • Alameda ………………………. • Fresno ………………………… • Kern ……………………………

• Contra Costa …………………. • San Joaquin ………………… • Ventura ………………….…….. • San Mateo ……………………. • San Francisco ……………….. • Tulare …………………………. • Stanislaus …………………….. • Monterey ……………………… • Santa Barbara ……………….. • Sonoma ……………………….

26.0% 8.7% 7.6% 6.1% 6.1% 4.7% 4.0% 3.8% 3.2% 2.9%

2.4% 2.1% 2.1% 1.8% 1.7% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 1.2% 1.0%

Page 9: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA data availability, 2013-2015 births

Top Delivery Counties

• 35 counties with largest number of births

• 98% of California births

Page 10: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• In 2010, WIC began funding a portion of MIHA to:

– examine eligible women not enrolled in WIC

– evaluate WIC impact

– examine reasons for not enrolling

• Results inform outreach efforts to increase coverage of populations that need services, at state and local levels

Collaboration with WIC

Page 11: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Collaboration with CDC on Healthy People 2020

Partnership to provide national estimates for 10 Healthy People 2020 Maternal, Infant and Child Health Objectives using PRAMS/MIHA data

16.1 Discussed preconception health with a health care worker prior to pregnancy

16.2 Took multivitamins/folic acid prior to pregnancy

16.3 Did not smoke prior to pregnancy

16.4 Did not drink alcohol prior to pregnancy

16.5 Had a healthy weight prior to pregnancy

16.6 Used contraception postpartum to plan subsequent pregnancy

18 Reduce postpartum relapse of smoking among women who quit smoking during pregnancy

19 Increase the proportion of women giving birth who attend a postpartum care visit with a health worker

20 Increase the proportion of infants put to sleep on their backs

NEW Reduce the proportion of women with postpartum depressive symptoms

Page 12: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Include survey items to address public health priorities

• Tdap and flu vaccination (Immunization Branch)

• Receipt of birth defects screening, reasons for no screening (Genetic Disease)

Analyze existing data to measure health status and access to care

• Oral health problems and access to dental care (Oral Health Unit)

• Maternal smoking before, during, and after pregnancy (Tobacco Control Prog.)

• Hypertension before pregnancy (Chronic Disease / Injury Control)

• Disparities in infant feeding practices (Office of Health Equity; DHCS)

• Infant sleep environment and tobacco use during pregnancy (COIIN)

• Set federally mandated targets and monitor progress (Title V Block Grant)

Collaboration to support public health action

Page 13: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

• County and MIHA Regional Statistics – Statistical comparison to the rest of California – By race/ethnicity, income, prenatal health insurance, maternal age, education

• Pooled years 2010-2012

County / Region Sub-group Snapshots have been posted!

• Statewide Statistics

– By race/ethnicity, income, prenatal health insurance, maternal age, education – Other potential subgroups, such as urban/rural, inter-birth interval, geographic

areas with concentrated poverty

2012 MIHA data have been posted!

MIHA publications

Page 14: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Snapshots available for selected counties and all MIHA Regions

Geographic Areas: County or region

compared with California

Statistical Information: Percent, 95% Confidence

Interval, Population Estimate

Symbols indicate statistically better or worse

than rest of state.

Page 15: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA Snapshots by Maternal Characteristics, Selected counties and all MIHA Regions

- 2012

- 2012

Total column for

county/region

Maternal characteristic

columns

Statistical information:

percent, 95% confidence

interval

Page 16: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Public Health Action

Increased awareness of disparities through annual breastfeeding conference Convened CPSP “Lactation Leaders” workgroup to increase breastfeeding support services Developed grant proposal to strengthen lactation services in partnership with FQHCs Revised educational materials to ensure appropriate literacy level and Spanish translation

47 63 63 67

0 1 2 3 4 5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

< High School Hispanic Income belowpoverty

Medi-CalPrenatal Ins

Sonoma County spotlight Disparities in intention to exclusively breastfeed

Sonoma 72

Per

cent

age

of w

omen

who

int

ende

d to

exc

lusi

vely

br

east

feed

(95

% C

I)

The Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA) Survey is an annual population-based survey of women with a live birth, with a sample size of 13,680 in 2010-11. Percentages and 95% confidence intervals are weighted to represent all women with a live birth in 2010-2011 in California.

Page 17: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

Public Health Action • Engage hospitals and

FQHCs

• Identify modifiable risk factors for preterm birth

• Refine populations for intervention

• Set targets for improvement

Specific Initiatives

• MCAH Action Plan to

reduce postpartum depression among low income women

• Gates-Benioff Preterm Birth

37 20 21 18 11 4 3 6 0

10

20

30

40

50

No usualsource of

PREpreg care

No postpartumvisit

Prenataldepressive

sx

Postpartumdepressive

sx

Medi-Cal Private

San Francisco County spotlight Addressing disparities among low income women

Per

cent

age

of w

omen

wit

h in

dica

tor

(9

5% C

I)

The Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA) Survey is an annual population-based survey of women with a live birth, with a sample size of 13,680 in 2010-11. Percentages and 95% confidence intervals are weighted to represent all women with a live birth in 2010-2011 in California.

Page 18: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

San Francisco County spotlight Addressing disparities among low income women

Page 19: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA website

Information about MIHA

project Click tabs to download

MIHA products

Page 20: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

MIHA website

www.cdph.ca.gov/MIHA

Select location

Select geography

Click any link to open PDF

Go to the MIHA website

Page 21: Maternal and Infant Health Assessment (MIHA)

More information about MIHA and our publications is available on the website:

www.cdph.ca.gov/MIHA

To be added to the MIHA distribution list or to contact the MIHA Team, email us at

[email protected]

Questions?