MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS2011-12 STAR RESULTS

Presented by Audrey LeeDirector, Curriculum & Educational Technology

10 September 2012

County & State Comparison

ELA Above county and state averages (all grade

levels)

Math Above state averages (all grade levels) Above county averages in all but 2nd & 6th Secondary Math

ELA: Percent Proficient Trends

Math: Percent Proficient Trends

History and Social Science

History (8th, Grade 11, US History) Flat over the years at ~50% proficiency Slight growth in 8th Grade History

Social Science (5th, 8th, 10th, Bio, Chem, ES) Decline in Biology and Earth Science Growth in 8th Grade Science

API & AYP

Comparison

Because of a testing irregularity (not in MUSD)

AYP and API will not be released until October

ASAM: Vicente & Briones

Indicators1. Credit recovery2. Student Persistence 3. Math Achievement

2009 2010 2011 2012 (Projected)

4 Year Change

Vicente 556 518 506 554 -2

Briones 489 628 647 635 +146

API: 4 Year Trends & Projections

2009 2010 2011 2012 (Projected)

4 Year Change

District 808 819 832 - +24 (3 yr)

Alhambra High School 794 815 805 813 +19

Martinez Junior High School

800 822 846 861 +61

John Muir 807 786 831 826 +19

John Swett 893 896 905 917 +24

Las Juntas 857 850 850* 835 -22

Morello Park 886 894 909 932 +46

** Projected API Scores are from Data Director and NOT official scores

Las Juntas – PI Update

2011 Testing Irregularity

Projected API could mean Year 2 PI Status is coming

Compliance Implications: School Choice/Transportation Set aside of Title I Funding for SES Comprehensive Assessment + Plan for CDE

CONTEXT: AYP Targets Over Time

NUMERICALLY SIGNIFICANT SUBGROUPS

Numerically Significant Subgroups

Hispanic or Latino White

English Learners Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Two or More Races Students with Disabilities

Subgroup Comparison

Subgroup Areas of Growth To Watch Areas of Decline

Economically Disadvantaged Students (867 = 28%)

•2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th ELA•4th Math•General Math•Algebra 1

•3rd ELA •8th ELA•10th ELA

•5th ELA•6th Math •Algebra II

Students with Disabilities (320 = 10%)

•4th, 8th, 10th ELA •3rd ELA•7th ELA•9th ELA

•7th ELA•6th Math

English Learners (235 = 8%)

•4th, 9th, 11th ELA•4th Math•General Math

•3rd ELA•7th ELA•3rd Math

•2nd Math & ELA•Algebra I

Comparison by Ethnicity: ELA Percent Proficient

Grade White 1677 (54%)

Hispanic/Latino839 (27%)

Two or More Races304 (10%)

2nd 75% 59% 76%

3rd 75% 63% 67%

4th 84% 80% 82%

5th 76% 74% 71%

6th 78% 54% 80%

7th 84% 53% 80%

8th 78% 56% 58%

9th 86% 63% 68%

10th 66% 44% 64%

11th 65% 43% 53%

Comparison by Ethnicity: Math Percent Proficient

Grade White Hispanic/ Latino839 (27%)

Two or More Races304 (10%)

2nd 75% 61% 78%

3rd 89% 84% 87%

4th 76% 81% 83%

5th 75% 68% 62%

6th 68% 37% 60%

7th 79% 59% 62%

General Math 60% 49% 69%

Algebra 1 49% 45% 48%

Geometry 66% 43% 47%

Algebra II 63% 53% 78%

CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS

Identified for Further Analysis

2nd & 5th Grade Math, ELA CST Cluster Analysis – site specific

6th Grade Math MJHS has already put changes in place to address

Earth Science Increase in percent proficient = bump for AHS

Subgroups: ELs, Hispanic/Latino, SED, SPED Evaluate Programs (Imagine Learning, Read 180) CST Cluster Analysis – site specific Target Interventions

Schools Over 800 are DifferentStandards mastery & coverage is not enough!

College & Career Readiness, Common Core State Standards, Tech Integration

With All That in Mind…Next Steps Data Discussions at AC = model best practices

How do district trends look at each site? What’s working for some teachers?

Continued critical analysis of Programs Data around usage and student achievement

Professional Development around CCSS Big Ideas Take the next step Transition smoothly to CCSS

Questions?