marketing marketing industrial tires ute weiß, 10.09.08 © continental ag tyre test „energy...

Ute Weiß, 10.09.08 © Continental AGMarketing

Marketing Industrial Tires

Industrial Tires

Lift Up Your Business!

Industrial Tires


Tyre Test „Energy consumption“

September 4-5, 2008 with Dekra, Klettwitz, Germany



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


1. Goal

2. Tires tested

3. Participants

4. Test procedures

5. Results

6. Conclusion



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


1. Goal

• Emphasize the excellent performance of CSEasy SC20

• Sensitize the end consumer for energy consumption and saving potentialbased on choice of tire



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


2. Tires Tested

CSEasy SC20

Magnum Premia

Elite XP Eltor 5

Rota VP15 Softy NP80

Dimensions: 180/70-8 and 225/70-10



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


3. Participants

- 6 Journalists from Germany and the Netherlands representing the tire and intralogistics industry.

- Check and Certifying: DEKRA

- Steering of the testing: Continental AG, Industrial Tires, Hans-Jürgen Sauerwald, Hartmut Weinhold



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


AB

30 m (VDI 2198)

1

2

1/8/9

2

4/5

20 m

3

67

Driving cycle in compliance with VDI 2198

2x lifting full load

4. Test Procedere

Operational cycle sections 1-2, 3-6 und 7-9 = braking, steering, liftingOperational cycle sections 2-3 und 6-7 = pure driving sections



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


The table shows the measured values as read from the display of the measuring device on the forklift.

The driver has the greatest influence in the operational cycle sections 1-2, 3-6 and 7-9, (braking, steering, lifting, etc.).The driving speed is set to 8 km/h, so the forklift attempts to maintain this speed. That is the reason for the rather precise reproducibility of the driving times in these areas.

Since the maximum speed is attained before crossing the light barriers, no additional accelerations occur on the 20 m long stretch, which also results in very good reproducibility of the consumption values.

5. Results – Data acquisition

Run Segment Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws) Time (s) Consumption (Ws)1 1-2 17,82 96464 18,48 107820 16,54 103396 16,54 105726 18,12 103162 16,18 100547 16,79 96276 16,59 103101

2-3 8,40 45562 8,6 63134 8,50 60456 8,55 60211 8,5 53946 8,6 54319 8,5 49555 8,55 608283-6 23,09 96751 22,68 112170 27,60 124603 23,4 112573 27,8 117608 21,25 102544 23,6 105736 24,68 1141286-7 8,40 45782 8,55 63492 8,50 59963 8,55 61948 8,5 55494 8,55 52974 8,5 50427 8,50 603667-9 55,40 339492 52,28 351936 55,60 354060 51,1 332625 56,93 349091 54,63 352849 49,72 320292 52,17 358361

Total 113,11 624051 110,59 698552 116,74 702478 108,14 673083 119,85 679301 109,21 663233 107,11 622286 110,49 6967842 1-2 17,82 94478 16,23 104018 16,64 104925 16,13 100526 18,89 103801 17,46 100842 18,07 103290 17,41 105884

2-3 8,40 44886 8,55 62551 8,50 61337 8,55 61544 8,5 56311 8,55 54874 8,55 51860 8,50 609013-6 23,60 98518 24,52 115459 28,36 126730 24,12 110232 25,91 111402 22,84 105271 24,22 103537 23,81 1106246-7 8,40 46127 8,55 63831 8,50 61414 8,55 59592 8,5 54922 8,55 54562 8,5 51478 8,50 608117-9 59,60 357162 57,91 340393 58,78 357662 55,14 351781 54,32 326409 55,81 333195 54,84 324231 55,35 334448

Total 117,82 641171 115,76 686252 120,78 712068 112,49 683675 116,12 652845 113,21 648744 114,18 634396 113,57 6726683 1-2 18,48 97943 15,97 99851 16,95 104163 17,61 104924 18,07 101330 15,67 91816 16,9 96741 15,97 101660

2-3 8,40 45269 8,55 62998 8,50 59627 8,55 60770 8,5 54562 8,55 53519 8,5 50708 8,50 603143-6 24,27 99112 26,78 118420 28,31 126961 24,68 112211 28,01 114366 24,47 108509 24,83 109787 23,86 1127366-7 8,40 45334 8,5 62223 8,50 61465 8,55 62176 8,5 54604 8,55 54468 8,5 50372 8,50 603537-9 57,70 326860 55,76 350096 55,65 345718 54,17 351446 49,97 322376 52,79 346703 56,27 318737 52,38 317789

Total 117,25 614518 115,56 693588 117,91 697934 113,56 691527 113,05 647238 110,03 655015 115 626345 109,21 6528524 1-2 17,41 95187 16,49 101682 16,38 102469 18,43 107807 16,28 96756 16,18 96903 17,61 95569 15,56 100670

2-3 8,35 44360 8,55 62752 8,50 61224 8,5 59830 8,5 54201 8,6 54233 8,55 50530 8,50 600523-6 23,50 99735 26,21 118254 26,37 116726 25,86 113740 26,98 109461 23,71 121235 24,78 103985 24,27 1105606-7 8,35 44875 8,55 62439 8,50 60245 8,55 61041 8,5 54903 8,5 53791 8,5 50404 8,50 604697-9 57,75 321673 55,55 360835 54,53 348224 58,37 340208 55,35 338243 57,91 365491 56,88 364864 52,74 353795

Total 115,36 605830 115,35 705962 114,28 688888 119,71 682626 115,61 653564 114,9 691653 116,32 665352 109,57 6855465 1-2 15,72 89204 15,82 102295 17,10 103838 18,64 106671 17,05 97698 15,82 95801 18,28 98642 15,81 102254

2-3 8,40 45272 8,55 63082 8,50 60724 8,55 60837 8,55 54564 8,55 53777 8,5 49451 8,50 591713-6 24,52 100422 26,78 119674 27,14 119690 25,8 117798 27,65 113061 22,37 103553 24,73 101496 22,53 1100706-7 8,40 43955 8,5 62195 8,50 60735 8,55 60806 8,5 54924 8,55 53810 8,5 49728 8,50 599857-9 61,70 361152 55,65 336799 54,17 342746 60,52 344817 58,93 348693 53,66 339332 52,68 328516 56,83 318332

Total 118,74 640005 115,3 684045 115,41 687733 122,06 690929 120,68 668940 108,95 646273 112,69 627833 112,17 649812

Check measurement2nd day

Elite XPSofty NP80Premia Eltor 5Elite XP Rota VP15CSEasy SC20 Magnum



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


5. Results – Energy cost evaluation – 2.000 operating hours per year

Total energy consumption for all sections, lifting energy as constant value

0,00

100,00

200,00

300,00

400,00

Con

tinen

tal

CS

Eas

yS

C20

Gum

asol

Sof

ty N

P80

Mar

ango

niE

ltor

5

Wat

tsP

rem

ia

Tre

llebo

rgR

ota

VP

15

Sol

idea

lM

agnu

m

Ber

goug

nan

Elit

e X

P

product

add

itio

nal

en

erg

y co

st –

200

0 o

per

atin

g h

ou

rs/y

ear

[€]



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


0,00

200,00

400,00

600,00

800,00

Con

tinen

tal

CS

Eas

yS

C20

Gum

asol

Sof

ty N

P80

Mar

ango

niE

ltor

5

Wat

tsP

rem

ia

Tre

llebo

rgR

ota

VP

15

Sol

idea

lM

agnu

m

Ber

goug

nan

Elit

e X

P

product

[€]

5. Results – Energy cost evaluation – 4.000 operating hours per yeara

dd

itio

na

l e

ne

rgy

co

st

– 2

00

0 o

pe

rati

ng

ho

urs

/ye

ar



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


5. Results – Energy cost evaluation – 6.000 operating hours per year

0,00

200,00

400,00

600,00

800,00

1000,00

ContinentalCSEasy

SC20

GumasolSofty NP80

MarangoniEltor 5

WattsPremia

TrelleborgRota VP 15

SolidealMagnum

BergougnanElite XP

product

[€]

ad

dit

ion

al

en

erg

y c

os

t –

60

00

op

era

tin

g h

ou

rs/y

ea

r



Industrial Tires


Industrial Tires


6. Conclusion

The CSEasy is the tire with the lowest energy consumption among the tested tires.

Further tire features were not considered in the test.

This test set-up is to show the importance of rolling resistance/energy consumption in a typical forklift application.

marketing marketing industrial tires ute weiß, 10.09.08 © continental ag tyre test „energy...

Documents