market model and australian experience in regulatory reform

42
Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform Session 1: Industry Structure and Reform Chris Pattas General Manager, Networks International Regulators Forum: JW Marriot Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 11 October 2011

Upload: others

Post on 03-May-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Market model and Australian experience in

regulatory reform

Session 1: Industry Structure and Reform

Chris PattasGeneral Manager, Networks

International Regulators Forum: JW Marriot Hotel, Kuala Lumpur,

Malaysia, 11 October 2011

Page 2: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Overview

1. Regulatory and market reforms

2. Market/Institutional Governance– Policy maker / regulator / operator separation

– AER Roles

3. Electricity market features

4. Economic regulation– Regulatory approach and models

– Recent decisions

– Future reform

Page 3: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Energy market reform

• National spot electricity market, 1999

• Break-up of integrated energy monopolies

late ’90s-early 2000s

• separate regulation of networks

businesses

• New spot markets in gas from 2010

• National distribution regulation, 2008

• National retail regulation, 2012 (non price)

Page 4: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Energy market ownership

Page 5: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Forms of energy regulation

Distribution

Generation

Customers

Retailing

TransmissionNatural

monopoly –

under price

regulation

Markets

with light

regulation

Page 6: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Energy market regulation

Page 7: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Electricity regulatory structure

QLD NSW ACT Vic Tas SA WA NT

LicensingOffice of

Energy

Minister

for

Energy

/ IPART

ICRC ESCV OTTER ESCOSA

ERA UC

Retail PricingOffice of

EnergyIPART ICRC DOI

OTTER

/ GPOCESCOSA

Non-price

Retail

Australian Energy Regulator (AER)Distribution

Transmission

Wholesale

Competition

RegulationAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)

Page 8: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Overview of AER’s roles in energyWholesale gas

& electricity

markets

Transmissionnetworks &

pipelines

DistributionNetworks for

gas/electricity

Retail & other

distribution

We monitor

wholesale markets

and enforce rules

We regulate

revenues of

transmission

businesses

We regulate

revenues of

distribution

businesses

We will regulate

non-price retail

activities

Page 9: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Australian electricity snapshot

• Population ~ 22.2 million

– 65% in capital cities

– 90% on east coast

• Electricity

– energy 213TWh pa

– peak 38,000MW

– installed 50,200MW

Queensland

Demand

8,900

Capacity

12,050

New South Wales

Demand 14,300

Capacity 15,900Victoria

Demand

10, 450

Capacity

10, 000

South Australia

Demand 3300

Capacity 3,850

Tasmania

Demand 1,750 Capacity 2,400

Western Australia

Demand 4,000

Capacity 5,000

Northern Territory

Demand 300

Capacity 1000

Snowy*

* 3676MW at Snowy gen split between NSW & VIC

Page 10: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

National electricity market

• fully interconnected AC

power system

• covers 4500km

• includes 3 DC links

• regional pricing model

• 5 regions

• one market/system

operator

Page 11: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Generation mix

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Black coal Brown coal Gas Hydro Wind Liquid Other

Per

cen

t o

f to

tal

gen

era

tio

n

Capacity Output

Page 12: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Market arrangements

Page 13: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

How are prices determined?

• Generators bid in

capacity

• 5-minute dispatch

intervals

• Lowest cost generation

dispatched first

• Spot price = marginal

bid for each 5-minute

interval, averaged over

½ hour

• A price is set for each

region in the NEM

Page 14: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Wholesale electricity quarterly prices

0

50

100

150

200

250

Ma

r 99

Ma

r 00

Ma

r 01

Ma

r 02

Ma

r 03

Ma

r 04

Ma

r 05

Ma

r 06

Ma

r 07

Ma

r 08

Ma

r 09

Ma

r 10

$/M

Wh

Queensland New South Wales Victoria South Australia Tasmania

Page 15: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Futures prices - electricity

0

30

60

90

120

150

Q4

20

10

Q1

20

11

Q2

20

11

Q3

20

11

Q4

20

11

Q1

20

12

Q2

20

12

Q3

20

12

Q4

20

12

Q1

20

13

Q2

20

13

Q3

20

13

Q4

20

13

Q1

20

14

Q2

20

14

Q3

20

14

Q4

20

14

$/M

Wh

Queensland New South Wales Victoria South Australia

Page 16: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Upstream gas supply

Page 17: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

South east gas markets

• Qld coal seam gas is boosting

supply

• rising demand for gas-fired

electricity generation

• carbon trading will further

increase demand

• LNG exports likely from around 2012

- domestic prices to rise

Page 18: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Market arrangements

• Mostly bilateral contracts

• Historically long term contracts, but

duration is getting shorter

• Victoria alone has spot market with

transparent pricing

• New spot markets for Sydney and

Adelaide in 2010

Page 19: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Reporting on market outcomes

• Weekly report

– Now produced for electricity and gas

– market dynamics and forecasts

• Longer-term statistics – website

• Reports on high priced events

• Annual state of the market report

• www.aer.gov.au – market snapshot

Page 20: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Composition of retail electricity prices

Page 21: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Network regulation

• Revenue model – building block approach

• Control mechanism – revenue cap/price cap etc

• Investment drivers

• Rate of return

• Efficient cost assessment

Page 22: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Network regulation - Building blocks

Return on capital

Depreciation

Operating costs

Tax

Allowable

revenue

÷Demand forecasts

Reference tariffs

RAB

Page 23: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Network building blocks

• Regulated revenues

based on efficient

costs

• Account for

circumstances of the

network, as well as

market and financial

conditions

Page 24: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Regulatory

Asset Base

Depreciation

BUILDING BLOCK

CALCULATION

Return on capitalWACC

Investment

(Capex)

Opex

Tax liability

Building block requirement =

approved revenue

Revenues - building block approach

Incentive scheme adjustments + / -

Page 25: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Electricity distributors

• First round completed (except Tas) – Approved revenues – $44 billion*

– Forecast investments – $32 billion*

– Opening asset base – $43 billion*

• 13 separate distributors

• 8.9 million customers

• 744,000km of distribution lines

* ($ 2009)

Page 26: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Control mechanism

• Revenue cap – revenues are capped– Annual increases (CPI-X)

– Distributors set tariffs – price not capped only revenue

– Annual adjustment for under/over recovery of revenue

• Price cap– Generally a weighted average of tariff classes

– Annual price increase capped not revenue

– CPI –X increases – no annual revenue adjustment

• Hybrid approaches – average revenue, revenue yield etc

• Annual pricing proposals– Approved by the AER

– Compliance with determination and rules

– Reasonableness of underlying estimates (consumption, tariff class changes)

Page 27: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Key investment drivers

• More rigorous licence conditions– Network security, safety and reliability

• Load growth and rising peak demand– Growth in air conditioning usage driving summer peaks

– New customer connections

– Demand management is only emerging

• Replacing ageing assets– Most assets installed in 1950 – 1970

• Rising input costs– Labour & commodity price rises impact capital expenditure

Page 28: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Rate of return

• Return on capital single largest building block

• Approved WACC around 9.00 – 10.00%

• Previous regulatory period returns around 8.50 – 9.00%

• Difference mainly driven by the debt risk premium (DRP)

• Recent decision on DRP 370-400 basis points– Previous regulatory period DRP around 150 basis points

– Overall WACC around 1.06% above previous period

• AER’s weighted average cost of capital review (2009)– MRP 6.5

– Equity beta 0.8

– Gearing 60%

– Dividend imputation 0.65

– Benchmark rating BBB+

Page 29: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Revenue illustration (Vic DNSPs)

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

$M

nom

inal

Return on capital Opex

Depreciation Tax allowance

Efficiency carryover amounts S factor amounts

Page 30: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Assessment of Efficient Cost

• AER adopts number of approaches– Bottom-up – examination of objectives, engineering options, and costs

of selected projects and programs

– Benchmark – unit cost comparison

– Revealed Cost (Incentive Regulation)

• Incentive Regulation – Applied under the electricity rules

– The right incentives motivates firms to operate efficiently

– Opex and capex allowance set as forecasts for the future period

– Retain opex under-spend, or bear over-spend (benefit sharing scheme)

– WACC allowance on forecast capex during the period

– Retain WACC allowance if underspend or bear overspend WACC

– Incentive to defer expenditure or reduce costs within period

• Historic cost used to guide next period forecast– Next two slides demonstrate this in practice

Page 31: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Vic DNSPs opex

Estimate AER Allowance

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Rea

l $

'm 2

01

0

Actual DNSP forecast opex allowance ESCV Allowance

AER final decision opex comparison for the Victorian DNSPs

Page 32: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Vic DNSPs capex

Estimate AER allowance

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Rea

l $

'm 2

01

0

Actual DNSP forecast capex allowance ESCV allowance

AER final decision capex comparison for the Victorian DNSPs

Page 33: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Network investment

Page 34: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Retail electricity prices

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Ind

ex

19

90

–9

1 =

10

0

Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Hobart Canberra

Prices are now rising and are expected to rise further

Page 35: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Retail electricity prices

Historically, Australia has had low retail electricity prices

Page 36: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Distribution revenue determinations

Proposal submitted by business

– Expenditure and investment forecasts

– Application of incentive schemes

Draft revenue decision (AER)

Revised proposal from business

– May only respond to issues raised in draft decision

Final revenue decision (AER)

– Must follow draft decision except for issues raised in

revised proposal

Approval of pricing schedules

Page 37: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Public consultations are held in

relation to regulatory matters

• The AER is required by law to hold public

consultations for certain types of matters.

• Even when not required to do so, the AER will

usually adopt a consultative approach

– helps to ensure procedural fairness ― one way in

which the interests of all stakeholders can be taken

into account in regulatory decision making.

– helps improve the transparency of regulatory decision

making

Page 38: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Formal documentation of decisions

• The AER formally documents all regulatory decisions

• The AER aims to publish written statement of reasons for decisions on its website (subject to requirements of confidentiality)

• The AER also documents the decision making process and keeps records of important correspondence and minutes of meeting

Page 39: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Checks and balances

1. Avenues for review - judicial review

2. Avenues for review - merits review

3. Access to written reasons of decisions

4. Freedom of information

5. Ombudsman

6. Culture at the AER

7. Multiple Commissioners making a decision

Page 40: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

New regulatory challenges

• New low carbon generation

• Demand management

• Smart Grid trial

• Smart meter rollout

Page 41: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Market reforms - conclusion

• Overall the reforms since late ’90s

– More competitive generation – but some

issues with market power remain

– More competitive retail sector

– More consistent regulation of networks under

a common national framework

– Still some way to go to move to full national

framework and getting the right balance

Page 42: Market model and Australian experience in regulatory reform

Questions