mariner village square pud - martin county florida · mariner village square pud is a commercial...
TRANSCRIPT
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
{
A. Application Information
MARINER VILLAGE SQUARE PUD REVISED PUD ZONING AGREEMENT AND REVISED MASTER SITE PLAN
Applicant: Ribbon Ventures, LLC
Property Owner: Ribbon Ventures, LLC
Contract Purchaser: KPF Capital, LLC
Agent for the Applicant: Morris A. Crady, AICP, Lucido & Associates
County Project Coordinator: Paul Schilling, Principal Planner
Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP
Project Number: M160-008
Application Type and Number: D058 201500356
Report Number: 2016_1205_M160-008_DRT_Staff_DRAFT
Application Received: 12/15/2015
Transmitted: 12/17/2015
Date of Staff Report: 04/13/2016
Joint Workshop: 04/21/2016
Resubmittal Received: 09/09/2016
Transmitted: 09/09/2016
Date of Staff Report: 12/05/2016
B. Project description and analysis
Request approval of the Fifth Amendment to the PUD Zoning Agreement, Revised Master Site Plan and
proposed Phasing Plan. The partially developed property is approximately 20 acres in size and located
on the west side of Federal Hwy (US 1) at the intersection of Mariner Sands Dr and Federal Hwy
between Port Salerno and Hobe Sound. Included in the application is a request for a deferral of a
Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation.
Mariner Village Square PUD is a commercial development that is located on the west side of Federal
Hwy (US 1) at the intersection of Mariner Sands Dr and Federal Hwy between Port Salerno and Hobe
Sound. A Master Site Plan for the Mariner Village Square PUD was originally approval by the Board of
County Commissioners on January 29, 1987. Water and wastewater service is provided by Martin
County Utilities.
The Final Site Plan for Phase 1 was approved in 1988 and the improvements completed in 1989. The
Development Review Staff Report
Page 2 of 19
Phase 1 improvements included a 15,000 square feet (sf), 2-story bank/office building with required
parking and landscaping, stormwater management system for the entire project, right and left turn lanes
on US-1, and the creation of a Preserve Area Management Plan (PAMP) for the entire project. The
bank/office building site located on the northwest corner of the intersection of US-1 and Mariner
Sands Dr, has been conveyed by way of Plat 1 of the Mariner Village Square PUD.
Over the years, four amendments have been received and approved for the project including the Fourth
Amendment which was approved on June 8, 2004. The Fourth Amendment revised the Master Site Plan,
the Phasing Plan and the timetable of development. Phase 2 provided for 27,128 sf of retail and office
space; Phase 3 included 28,050 sf of retail space and Phase 4 provided for 75,000 sf, 3-story office
building. The timetable for development of Phases 2, 3, and 4 has expired.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
A Revised Master Site Plan and Phasing Plan with the following changes are proposed by way of the
Fifth Amendment to the Mariner Village Square PUD zoning agreement:
Proposed Changes to Master Plan and Phasing Plan
Phase 1 (Lot 1): No change to the existing 15,000 sf bank/office building or the 71 parking
spaces is proposed, however, the project entrance on US-1 and existing access tract will be
restored and enhanced as part of the proposed Phase 2 site work.
Phase 2 (Lot 2): Revise building area from a 75,000 sf, 3-story office building to a 2-story, 152-bed
residential care facility (assisted living and memory care) and add "right-in/right-out" service entrance
on US-1. (Formerly Phase 4)
Phase 3 (Lot 3A and 3B): Revise building area from 27, 128 sf retail and office space to 6,000 sf of
restaurant space and 10,000 sf of retail building. (Formerly Phase 2)
Phase 4 (Lot 4): Revise building area from 28,050 sf of retail space to a 2-story, 108-bed residential
care facility (assisted living). (Formerly Phase 3)
No changes to PUD conditions as stated in the 4th Amendment to the PUD Agreement are proposed.
The project retains the original wetland preserve and 50' buffer and includes increase upland preserve
and an updated Preserve Area Management Plan.
The improvements required for the remaining Phases have been specifically described on the Phasing
Plan and within the revised PUD Timetable for Development. The applicant intends to include all
required infrastructure to support the entire subdivision with Phase 2. The completion of all site
infrastructure and preserve area requirements shall be required prior the issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy in Phase 2.
Proposed Changes to the PUD Timetable
The revised PUD Timetable will provide a maximum of 5 years to obtain final site plan approval of the
remaining phases as follows:
Development Review Staff Report
Page 3 of 19
Date to obtain Final Site plan approval (on or before) Completion (on or before)
Phase 2: December 31, 2017 December 30, 2019
Phase 3: December 31, 2018 December 31, 2020
Phase 4: December 31, 2020 December 31, 2022
C. Staff recommendation
The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in
Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows:
Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment
F Comprehensive Plan Paul Schilling 288-5473 Non-Comply
F ARDP Samantha Lovelady 288-5664 Done
G Development Review Paul Schilling 288-5473 Non-Comply
H Urban Design Paul Schilling 288-5473 N/A
H Community Redevelopment Paul Schilling 288-5473 N/A
I Property Management Colleen Holmes 288-5793 N/A
J Environmental Shawn McCarthy 288-5508 Comply
J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm 221-1317 N/A
K Transportation Stephanie Piche 223-4858 Non-Comply
L County Surveyor Michael O’Brien 288-5418 N/A
M Engineering Michelle Cullum 288-5512 Non-Comply
N Addressing Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply
N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply
O Water and Wastewater James Christ 320-3034 Comply
O Wellfields James Christ 320-3034 Comply
P Fire Prevention Doug Killane 288-5633 Comply
P Emergency Management Debra McCaughey 219-4941 N/A
Q ADA Judy Lamb 221-1396 N/A
R Health Department Todd Reinhold 221-4090 N/A
R School Board Kimberly Everman 223-3105 N/A
S County Attorney Krista Storey 288-5443 On-going
T Adequate Public Facilities Paul Schilling 288-5473 Review Pending
D. Review Board action
This application meets the threshold requirements for processing as a major development. As such, a
review of this application is required by the Local Planning Agency (LPA) and final action by the Board
of County Commissioners (BCC). Both the LPA and the BCC meetings must be public hearings.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR §10.1.B. (2016)
Pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR, it shall at all times be the applicant’s responsibility to demonstrate
compliance with the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), Land Development
Regulations (LDR) and the Code.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 4 of 19
The applicant sought to address non-compliance findings from the initial staff report with its resubmittal
dated September 9, 2016. Both the initial staff report and resubmittal are incorporated herein by
reference.
The applicant is required to re-submit materials in response to the non-compliance findings within this
report. Upon receipt, the re-submitted materials will be transmitted for review to the appropriate review
agencies and individuals that participate in the County's review process. A revised staff report will be
created once the next review cycle has been completed.
Section 10.2.D.4. Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla., (2016) pertaining to review
cycles states,
4. Planned Unit Developments and Developments of Regional Impact shall be allowed three
(3) resubmittals without payment of a resubmittal fee. All other development applications
noted in Section 10.1.D are allowed a single resubmittal of application materials, without
payment of additional review fees. Up to two (2) additional submittals (hereinafter
referred to as "elective submittals") shall be allowed with payment of a resubmittal fee.
The resubmittal fee for elective submittals shall be established by resolution, taking into
consideration the non-substantial or substantial nature of the elective resubmittal and the
magnitude of the review required of any revised portion of the application. The applicant
shall have ninety (90) days from the issuance date of the report to resubmit. The County
Administrator may grant one (1) extension not to exceed 60 days upon a showing of good
cause.
If the applicant fails to meet the resubmittal deadline including any approved extension
period, the application shall be terminated, unless the applicant gives notice that an
elective resubmittal will be made. The elective resubmittal shall be made within 90 days
from the date the prior resubmittal was due, and shall include the resubmittal fee
established by resolution. All traffic studies, surveys and other documents that have
expired must be updated by the applicant.
The applicant's resubmittal may include a request that disputed items be transmitted to the
final decision maker for resolution.
E. Location and site information
On the west side of Federal Hwy (US 1) at the intersection of Mariner Sands Dr and Federal Hwy
between Port Salerno and Hobe Sound
Parcel number(s) and address:
31-38-42-000-014-0001.0-60000 No Address
31-38-42-000-014-0001.0-60000 6900 SE Federal Hwy
31-38-42-000-014-0001.0-60000 SE Federal Hwy
31-38-42-008-000-0000.1-80000 6860 SE Federal Hwy
31-38-42-008-000-0000.2-70000 SE Federal Hwy
31-38-42-008-000-0000.3-60000 SE Federal Hwy
Development Review Staff Report
Page 5 of 19
Existing Zoning: PUD-C, Planned Unit Development Commerical
Future land use: Commercial General
Commission district: 4
Municipal taxing district: C, South Central MSTU
Planning area: South County
Taxing district: C
Traffic analysis zone: 57
General features of the proposed development site:
Gross area of site: 20.28 acres
Upland Preserve Area 0.75 acres
Upland Buffer: 1.13 acres
Wetland Preserve: 0.90 acres
Current use: Phase 1 – Existing bank/office building, subdivision entrance and
portion of access tract on approximately 1.86 acres. Remainder of
subject property is vacant and undeveloped.
Adjacent existing or proposed development:
To the north: Developed as Mariner Village townhomes in accordance with the
COR-2 zoning district.
To the south: Vacant and designated for COR future land use
To the east: Federal Hwy (US 1)
To the west: Developed as Mariner Village single family subdivision
Development Review Staff Report
Page 12 of 19
F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements -
Growth Management Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Generic Comp Plan Compliance-GMD
This application cannot be deemed to be in compliance with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan (CGMP) until the issues identified in this report have been satisfactorily resolved.
Martin County, Fla., CGMP, § 1.3
G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural
requirements - Growth Management Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Master Site Plan
A complete site plan is required as part of the application pursuant to Section 10.2.B.5, LDR, Martin
County, Fla. (2016)
1. Phase 4 (Lot 4) residential care facility on the Revised Master Plan and Phasing Plan is labeled
as a 94 bed facility. However, the parking requirements calculate the required parking with 108
beds and the Phasing Data lists 108 beds. Please revise accordingly.
Item #2:
Phasing Plan
A complete Phasing Plan is required as part of the application pursuant to Section 10.2.B.5, LDR,
Martin County, Fla. (2016)
1. The Phasing Plan does not graphically depict the Phasing Data. Provide phase lines that indicate
the areas to be constructed in each phase. For example, the existing lake and stormwater
treatment areas are located in Lot 4 which is proposed to be built in Phase 4; however, the
Phasing Data lists the lake and treatment areas in Phase 2. The phasing plan view should be a
graphical representation of the phasing data. Please revise accordingly.
2. Each Phase should be self-sufficient. Include the required supportive infrastructure and
graphically represent what will be constructed in each phase.
Item #2:
PUD Zoning Amendment
Additional revisions to the proposed Fifth Amendment to the PUD Zoning Agreement may be required.
H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements
– Community Development Department
Commercial Design
Development Review Staff Report
Page 13 of 19
N/A
The applicant has indicated that there is no construction proposed as part of this application. Therefore,
the Commercial Design reviewer was not required to review this application. A review will be required
as part of the future final site plan applications for Phases 2, 3, and 4. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR
§4.871.B.2
Community Redevelopment Area
N/A
The applicant has indicated that the proposed project is not located within a Community Redevelopment
Area. Therefore, the Community Redevelopment Area reviewer was not required to review this
application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, Division 6
I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements – Engineering
Department
N/A
The Engineering Department was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin
County Codes for property management requirements of the Land Development Regulations.
J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth
Management Department
Environmental
Findings of Compliance:
The Growth Management Department Environmental Division staff has reviewed the application and
finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations. The proposed Master Site
Plan shows the existing onsite wetland with the required fifty foot wetland buffer. In addition, the plan
provides for twenty-five percent of common upland habitat to be set aside in accordance with Martin
County code. The upland preserve is shown along the south end of the property.
Since this application is a request for Master Site approval, a Preserve Area Management Plan (PAMP)
has not been provided, but will be required prior to Final Site Plan approval. A jurisdictional wetland
determination approved by the South Florida Water Management District will also be required at time of
Final Site Plan approval. Any change to the wetland jurisdictional line must be reflected on all county
approved site plans.
Landscape
This project application is a N/A for landscaping. No landscape plans are being reviewed in association
with this application for Revised PUD Zoning Agreement and Master Site plan. Landscape plans will be
submitted and reviewed at time of Final Site Plan Review. It appears that areas provided on the Master
Plan will provide for required landscape areas.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 14 of 19
K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Traffic Impact
1. The number of beds utilized for both Land Use 254 and Land Use 620 must be consistent with
the PUD Timetable, Revised Master Plan and Revised Phasing Plan.
2. Buildout year must be consistent with Narrative and Phasing Plan (2024)
3. Table 1: Revise Generalized Service Capacity for SE Cove Road (SR-5 to CR-A1A) for
consistency with latest LOS Report. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR §5.64.C.5 (2009)
4. A worst case preliminary review that excludes internal capture has performed by staff and has
indicated that the exclusion of internal capture will not negatively affect the Level of Service in
the Build Out Year.
5. Exhibit 3 shows no west bound right turning movements. Provide count collection data.
6. A seasonal factor of 0.88 must be used for the collection date of 3/10/15.
7. Signal timing cannot be adjusted to mitigate impacts.
L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department
N/A
The Engineering Department was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin
County Codes for survey requirements contained in Article 4 of the Land Development Regulations.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR §10.1.F
M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements
- Engineering Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Rights Of Way Improvements
Remove the southern right-in right-out service driveway. The access at that location does not meet the
separation requirements between the middle driveway and eliminates the ability for the property to the
south to meet the separation requirements. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR § 4.845.B.3 (2001)
Item #2:
Off-Street Parking
1. The north residential care facility on the Revised Master Plan and Revised Phasing Plan is
labeled as a 94 bed facility; however the parking requirements calculates the required parking
with 108 beds and the Phasing Data lists 108 beds.
2. Provide the building square footage for both residential care facilities to demonstrate loading
spaces are adequate. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR § 4.626.B.4 (2009)
3. Crosswalks markings do not meet Martin County Standard Detail R-120C. Revise the mid-block
crosswalks to be consistent with the detail. MARTIN COUNTY FLA STANDARD DETAILS
Development Review Staff Report
Page 15 of 19
R-120C (2015)
4. Sidewalks should not end at a vehicle travel way promoting pedestrians to cross without a
crosswalk. Provide a crosswalk for the western side of the sidewalk at the entrance to the drop
off area for the southern Residential Care Facility.
5. Provide pavement markings and signage directing motorists entering and exiting the covered
drop off areas for both residential care facilities.
Item #3:
Consistency With Other Plans
1. As previously indicated, the scale on the Phasing Plan is incorrect. It seems the drawing was
printed at a 60-foot scale. The scale was changed for the Master Plan to address the comment in
the previous staff report; however, the scale was not corrected on the Phasing Plan.
2. The Phasing Plan does not graphically depict the Phasing Data. Provide phase lines that indicate
the areas to be constructed in each phase. For example, the existing lake and stormwater
treatment areas are located in Lot 4 which is proposed to be built in Phase 4; however, the
Phasing Data lists the lake and treatment areas in Phase 2. The phasing plan view should be a
graphical representation of the phasing data.
3. Show Phasing limits on the Site Improvement Plans. Each Phase should be self-sufficient.
Include the required supportive infrastructure and graphically represent what will be constructed
in each phase. Staff suggests considering how / when the final outfall will be constructed. Per
the Conceptual Stormwater Drainage Plan, the outfall structures and pipes are located in Lot 3B;
however, Lot 3B is in Phase 3.
Item #4:
Stormwater Mgmt Concept Plan
As previously stated, the proposed lake modifications on the Revised Master and Phasing Plan may not
be within 50 feet of any property line as measured from the edge of water to the property line. The
existing lake location may remain as it was constructed as previously approved; however, any
modification to the lake that shifts the edge of water closer to the property line is not permitted. The 50
feet requirement must be met from the north property line.
N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements – Growth
Management and Information Technology Departments
Addressing
Findings of Compliance:
The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County
Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable
addressing regulations.
All street names on this site plan meet all street naming requirements in Section 4.767., Land
Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla.
Electronic File Submittal
Development Review Staff Report
Page 16 of 19
Findings of Compliance:
The Information Services Department staff has reviewed the electronic file submittal and finds it in
compliance with the applicable county requirements Section 10.2.B.5., Land Development Regulations,
Martin County, Fla.
O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department
Water and Wastewater Service
Findings of Compliance:
This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances
and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater
level of service.
Wellfield and Groundwater Protection
Findings of Compliance:
The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The
reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection
Ordinances.
P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements –
Fire Rescue Department
Fire Prevention
Findings of Compliance:
The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions
governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable
provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous
requirements of prior reviews.
Approval for Master.
Additional Information:
Information #1:
Martin County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 79.121, adopts NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 as the
county's fire prevention code. The Code is to prescribe minimum requirements necessary to establish a
reasonable level of fire and life safety and property protection from the hazards created by fire,
explosion, and dangerous conditions. This is in accordance with Chapter 633, F.S. All construction,
including, but not limited to, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire suppression systems, shall be subject to
these codes. All documents including specifications and hydraulic calculations are required at the time
of the application for a building permit for the property that is the subject of this application for site plan
approval.
Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General
Services Department
Development Review Staff Report
Page 17 of 19
The proposed revisions to the approved master site plan, phasing plan and PUD agreement do not
involve any areas that are anticipated to affect ADA requirements, which are applied at final site plan
review. Approval of this application will not result in any inconsistencies with requirements of Title III
of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School
Board
Martin County Health Department N/A
The applicant has indicated that no construction is proposed and there are no proposed onsite potable
wells or septic disposal systems. Therefore, the Department of Health was not required to review this
application for consistency with the Martin County Code requirements within the Land Development
Regulations or Comprehensive Growth Management Plan. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR §10.1.F
Martin County School Board
N/A
The applicant has indicated that this application is for non-residential uses only. Therefore the Martin
County School Board was not required to review this application for school concurrency evaluation.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR §10.1.F
S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office
Review On-going.
T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible
departments
Pending
U. Post-approval requirements
Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant’s submittal of all required
documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including
unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval.
Item #1:
Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval
Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post
Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged
in the order shown on the list.
Item #2:
Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post
approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the
development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 18 of 19
Item #3:
Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management
Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount
required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court.
Item #4:
Six (6) copies 24" x 36"of the approved revised master site plan (Exhibit D).
Item #5:
Original approved revised master site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material.
Item #6:
Six (6) copies 24" x 36"of the approved phasing plan (Exhibit D-1).
Item #7:
Original approved phasing plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material.
Item #8:
One (1) digital copy of master site plan in AutoCAD 2006 or 2007 drawing format (.dwg). The digital
version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted.
Item #9:
Original and one (1) copy of the executed approved Fifth Amendment to the PUD Zoning Agreement
V. Local, State, and Federal Permits
All the applicable Local, State and Federal Permits have been issued.
W. Fees
Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public
hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows:
Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance:
Application review fees: $13,800.00 $13,800.00 $0.00
Advertising fees*: TBD
Recording fees**: TBD
Mandatory impact fees: TBD
Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD
* Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County.
** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 19 of 19
X. General application information
Applicant: Ribbon Ventures, LLC
Rita M. Wilson
P. O. Box 418
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Agent: Lucido & Associates
Morris A. Crady, AICP
701 East Ocean Blvd
Stuart, FL 34994
772-220-2100
Contract
Purchaser: KPF Capital, LLC
151 Kalmus Drive, A-203
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attorney: Michael J. McNicholas, McCarthy, Summers Et Al
2400 SE Federal Hwy., 4th Floor
Stuart, FL 34994
Y. Acronyms
ADA ............. Americans with Disability Act
AHJ .............. Authority Having Jurisdiction
ARDP ........... Active Residential Development Preference
BCC.............. Board of County Commissioners
CGMP .......... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan
CIE ............... Capital Improvements Element
CIP ............... Capital Improvements Plan
FACBC ........ Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
FDEP ............ Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FDOT ........... Florida Department of Transportation
LDR.............. Land Development Regulations
LPA .............. Local Planning Agency
MCC ............. Martin County Code
MCHD.......... Martin County Health Department
NFPA ........... National Fire Protection Association
SFWMD ....... South Florida Water Management District
W/WWSA .... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement
Z. Attachments