marilyn johnston professor ohio state university
Post on 21-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Marilyn JohnstonProfessor
Ohio State University
All descriptions of educational reforms are embedded in:
political and cultural contexts, research agendas, funding policies, and teaching practices both inside and outside teacher education
the value orientations of individuals, institutions, and governments
narratives that are never a matter of pure description or linear progress
and . . .
Many streams of activities/perspectives coincide in any given period.
Ideas resurface in cyclical patterns, reflecting the political context in which they exist.
Ideas that move across cultures always require cultural adaptation.
is influenced by my attachments to:
Dewey’s pragmatism and progressive education historically social constructivist and socio-cultural theories currently issues of social justice and multicultural and democratic education
National policies vary enormously as they are put into practice:
--state--school district --school building --classroom level
Standards make general statements about scope and sequence and reflect broad principles and ideologies.
Implementation of standards and evaluation of learning determine whether standards are used to enrich or constrain the curriculum, whether they provide rich learning or narrow training.
professionalization deregulation
professionalization
standards/ standardization
knowledge base
authoritative discourses
individual autonomy
deregulation
democratic goals
theoreticaldifferences
internally persuasivediscourses
collegiality & collaboration
Three strands:
policymaking
outside theprofession
reformwithin theprofession
research within theprofession
Three strands:
policymaking
outside theprofession
reformwithin theprofession
researchwithin theprofession
my opinion:
This is national policy making tied to political agendas and naïve conceptions of teaching and learning.
Following slides from: www.nclb.gov/next/overview/presentation/index.html
Secretary of Education, Rod Paige’s Annual Report – 2002
“ Meeting the Highly Qualified Teachers Challenge”
goal: to dismantle teacher education as we know it
(Cochran-Smith, 2002, Grossman, 2003)
Argues that academic standards for teachers are low, whereas the barriers that keep out “qualified” persons are high.
Secretary Paige continues:
states must transform certification requirements “basing their programs on rigorous academic content, eliminating cumbersome requirements not based on scientific evidence, and doing more to attract highly qualified candidates from a variety of fields.”
40 states have adopted alternative certification options
alternative certification is most appealing in times of teacher shortage.
“In some areas teachers are better prepared than ever, while in schools that serve the greatest numbers of poor and minority children, more and more teachers are underqualified.” (Grossman, 2002)
Alternative programs are resource and labor intensive and often have high dropout rates.
There are inconsistent research results on recruitment and retention related to alternative certification (Wilson, et al, 2001)
Three strands:
policymaking
outside theprofession
reformwithin theprofession
research within the profession
Marilyn Cochran-Smith divides the history of research in teaching and teacher education into 4 periods, each with a different question:
--attribute question – early 1950s to 1960sWhat are the attributes of good teachers and teacher education programs?
--effectiveness question – 1960s to mid-1980s What are the strategies and processes used by effective
teachers? --knowledge question – 1980s through 1990s What should teachers know & be able to do?
Research on Teacher Knowledge
formal and practical knowledge (Fenstermacher, 1994) pedagogical content knowledge (L. Shulman, 1987) case knowledge (J. Shulman, 1992) craft knowledge (Grimmet & MacKinnon, 1992) knowledge in action (Schon, 1983) reflection on knowledge (Griffin, 1984; Schon, 1987; Zeichner & Liston, 1987) local knowledge constructed through teacher research (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993) & action research (Noffke, 1997)
Fourth question:
outcomes question – late 1990s to present
What outcomes should be expected from
good teaching and good teacher education?
Three strands:
policymaking
outside theprofession
reformwithin theprofession
research within the profession
the context for changemid-1980s
Two national major reports that were critical of education, particularly teacher education:
1. A National At Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (1983) National Commission on Excellence in Education
2. Carnegie Report (1986) Carnegie Commission
Described teacher education as:
o irrelevant and lacking a scholarly knowledge base
o lacking connection with the schoolso poorly preparing teachers in the academic
areas
Holmes Group (1986, 1990, 1995) proposed: strong undergraduate preparation in the subjects
that they teach graduate level professional education close connections with school-based educators
(Professional Development Schools - PDSs) in centers of collaborative inquiry and professional development
deep understanding of children sensitivity & adaptability to context & culture
Original member of the Holmes Group Moved to a graduate certification program (M.Ed.) Redesigned teacher education programs and
curriculum Established Professional Development Schools
(PDSs) for all certification programs – year-long school placements for students
Only faculty teach courses—consequences for program & student numbers
Reform within the profession is influenced by:
teacher education knowledge base
movement toward standards for teacher education
professionalization of teaching
Within the ProfessionMovement toward Standards
1996 – What Matters Most: Teaching for America’s Future (Report of the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future -- NCTAF)
1997 - $23 million from Dept of Education to support implementation of NCTAF recommendations
1997 – Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Quality
1998 - Promising Practices: New Ways to Improve Teacher Quality (U.S. Dept of Education, 1998)
2000 – Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education (Darling-Hammond)
NCTAF Recommendations
reinvent teacher education & professional development
get serious about standards for students & teachers
place qualified teachers in every classroom in America
support & reward teachers’ continuing development of knowledge & skill
create schools organized to support and sustain student and teacher success
“We propose an audacious goal for
America’s future. Within a decade-–by the year 2006—we will provide every student in America with what should be his or her educational birthright: access to competent, caring, qualified teaching in schools organized for success.” (NCTAF, 1996, p. vi)
Performance Based Assessment for Teacher Education
National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) Moved from inputs to outcome-based assessment From curriculum oriented standards to performance-
based standards Focus on what teacher candidate know and are able to
do
Interstate New Teacher Assessment & Support Consortium (INTASC) Board compatible standards for entry into the teaching
profession Concurrently ETS (Educational Testing Services) has
developed the Praxis Assessment Series—Praxis I, II, III
Performance Based Assessment for Teachers
National Board of Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS)
The mission is to: o maintain high and rigorous standards for what
accomplished teachers should know and be able to do (performance standards),
o provide a national voluntary system certifying teachers who meet these standards,
o advocate for education reforms to integrate National Board Certification in American education and to capitalize on the expertise of National Board Certified teachers.
1992-2002 – 24,000 teachers certified
Moving away from training and competency models to more constructivist learning approaches
Recognition of prior knowledge, teacher decision-making and career-long professional development
Emphasis on collegiality, collaboration, networks, self-study, teacher research, action research
Emphasis on issues of equity & social justice—effects of poverty and issues of race, class, gender, disability, and difference.
,
professionalization
standards/ standardization
authoritative discourses
a knowledge base
individual autonomy
deregulation
democratic goals
internally persuasivediscourses
theoreticaldifferences
collegiality & collaboration
Three strands:
policymaking
outside theprofession
reformwithin theprofession
research within the profession
Government Funded Studies
Department of Education funded 2 studies:1. Wilson, Floden & Mundy (Feb, 2001)
review of research on teacher preparation
2. National Research Council (2001), chaired by Richard Shavelson, reviewed research on the science and practice of national scientific research
within the profession movement toward
standards and professionalization
performance-based assessment for teachers & teacher education programs
Advocacy of multiple approaches to research
Peer-reviewed use of data and research results/interpretation
outside the profession movement toward
accountability and testing continuing critiques of
teacher education & support for alternative paths to certification
requirements for scientifically-based research
selective use of data and evidence