marco antonio rivera carrillo, a200 607 697 (bia april 22, 2011)

8/13/2019 Marco Antonio Rivera Carrillo, A200 607 697 (BIA April 22, 2011)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/marco-antonio-rivera-carrillo-a200-607-697-bia-april-22-2011 1/16

Bracamonte, Jose A, Esq.Law Oices of J A Bracamonte, PC2627 Noh Third Street, Ste 104hoenix, 850040000

U.S Department of Jusice

Executve Oce fr Immgaton Review

Board ofImmigration AppealsOce of the Clerk

5107 esburg Pik Sui 2000

Fls C1rch, Vina 2204

HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel • FLOP0 Box 25158Phoenix, 85002

Name: RIVERA-CARRLLO, MARCO ANTONIO 00·607697

Date of this notice: 4/22/2011

ncosed s a copy o the Boad's decision and order n the above-erenced case.

Encosue

Pane Membes:AdknsBanch Chales K.

Sincerey,

Donna CarrChie Clek

Cite as: Marco Antonio Rivera Carrillo, A200 607 697 (BIA April 22, 2011)



RIVEA-CARRO MARCO ANTONIO2060 N CENTER ST OT#281ESA 85201

US. patmt of ust

eue Oe r mmato Ree

Bor of Iro AppelOce of e Clerk

57 /.eesb1rg Pik, Sute 2Fal Crc1 Vrgiia 224

HS/CE Oce of Chief Counsel FOP Box 25158Phoenix 85002

Name: RIVERACARRILLO, MARCO ANTONIO 00607697

Date of this notice: 4/22/2011

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in te above-eferenced case. Ths copy is bengprovided to you as a courtesy Your attoney or representative has been seed with tsdecsion pursuant to 8 R § 12925(a) f te attaced decsion odes tat you be removedfom the Unted States or airms an Immgaton Judges decsion oderng tat you beremoved, any petton fo evew of te attaced decson must be ed wt and receved by theappropate court of appeas wthn 3 days of the date of te decison.

osue

Pael MembersAdksBlah hares K

incerelv

Do Cw

Doa ahe lerk




A 0 67 69

Se C.F .R. § 13.9(h)(2)(ii); see also Matter ofJoseph 22 I&N Dec. 799, 82 (BIA 999). alin will <t be cosder ''properly icluded" whi a dato detetio catego oy whe o Judge det hat the Depet oHoeld Suty is sbsttially uey to tlish, at e erits heg, the chge or chges tat subject the aie to ato deteo.Se

We d o clear eor i the Iiao Judges cocluso that e record o covicio do ot estlish wich subsectio o Arzoa Revised States sectio 3-26 te reodet w cocted der. Wile subsectios (A)() d (A)(2) cot the guage oitet to deaud," suo (A)(3) does ot cota such lguage. Therere, the statute is ot categorcally a ce olvig ora tide. See Matter ofSilva-Trevino 24 I&N Dec. 687, 689 . (A.G. 28) (i

a cvctio s ot categorcally cre volvig ora turpiude he record ust be alzed ur a odied categorcal approach tat ivolves exiatio o the rord o cvictio).Th m o Judge aled the record o covco uder te oe categrcal apprach a deteied that te record o covictio also did ot estsh te specic subsecto uderwh te resodet was covicted. Slarly, the Iiatio Judge cosdered te tird bsis

decbed Matter of SilvaTrevino, supra d cocude that oe o the evece outsde teal rord o covctio establshed tat the respodet had bee covicted o a cre vovg l titude s descbed i subsectos (A)() or (A)(2) o A.R.S. 326.

he DHS gues o appeal tat e Iao Judge eed i cocludg that the resdets covictio was ot a cre volvg oral turpitude bause eve subsectio (A)(3) cotis e lgage itet to duce," which establishes the requsite sceter uder Mater ofSilTrevino supra. A basc teet o stato iteretato holds tat a esave body uses spec lguage r a reaso. The zoa leslate speccay icuded the lguae itet to eaud" subsectos (A)() d (A)(2) o A.R.S. -26 e coclude tat the sece o ha specic tet lgage is subsectio (A)(3) was by cosso d ot osso. Te

legslatures deciso ot to icude lguage hat requires spc itet suppos the m aoJuges cocluso Therre, we d at he lguage i subsectio (A)() is isuciet to estblsh the requisite sceter to coclude tat he respodet coied a cre ivolvg ora urtude.

For e reos stated above, we d o eor i the atio Judges deteiatio t the DS dd ot estabish hat te goveet was substtialy ely to establish that he resodet was propery icuded witi the adato deteto provisios o seco 236 o te Act e OHS has ot preseted y get that the out o bod set by the iaoJudge w proprate, the ao Judges decisio s also fe o tat bis. See egMater of Patel 5 I&N Dec 666 (976) (ctors uique to each ale ust be evauate

deteg suitabli r release o custody).

DER: Te appea s dsssed.

R BRD

2




�

U.S. DEPARTMNT OF JSTICEXCUTIV OFFICE FOR IMIGATION REVIEW

MMIGRATON COURT3260 INAL ARKAY

FLORC, ARZONA 8513

FLE: A200-607697

N THE MER OF

VC, C

RSPODN

- ' , - l : }J �\i

·'

-.,

;".

IN RMOVAL PROCEEDGS

G JUDGW SP USDY

fI 0

equest having been made for a change n the custody status of respondentpursuant to 8 CFR 36l(c) and fu consideration havng been given to therepresentations of the Department of Homeand Securty and the respondentt is hereby

ORDERD that the request for a change in custody stats be denied

� ORDERED that the request be granted and that respondent be:

reeased from custody on hs own recognizance

� 50�

reeased from custody under bond of $OTHR

-;1·�

Copy of this decision has been served on the respondent and theDepartent of Hoeand e urit

sA PPEA L, ' i <-�e / ' � j c-J / � / Q FLOECE - FLORC ARIZOA

Date uy 15 010

BRUCE A TAYLORmmigration ude

XS



ATTACHMET TO NOTICE OF APPEAMarco Antonio RVERA-CARRILOA200607697

The Deparment of Homeland Secriy ("Deparment or "HS) appeas the

immigration cors Juy 5, 200 decision to gran the respondent ond in the amoun of$5000.

ISSUE PRESENTED

Did he immigration cot err as a maer of aw when it exercisedjrisdiction over the respondens cusody conditions and ordered himreleased on bond in the amont of $5,000, where the respondens criminahstory includes a class 6 lony convicion r Crimina Impersonation;

where this oense includes he inten to indce y deception y "assuminga se identity and "preending to e an empoyee or a represenative ofsome person or organizaion; where his oense sjects he respondent tomandaory detention nder A section 236(c)()(A), as an aienconviced of a crime of mora rpitude; and, where the Departmen needno charge an alien with the grond of removabiliy ha provides the basisr mandaoy deenion under A secion 236(c)()?

I

STATEMET OF THE CASE AND THE FACTS

The respondent is a hiry-two-year-old mae, naive and ciizen of Mexico whoallegedy rs enered he nited Saes witho admission or parole in approximatey993. (Bond Exh .)

On (Febrary 8, 2009), the rmer mmigraion and Naralization Service("Service or "NS) vontariy retued he responden to Mexico

On Febrary 28, 2009 the respondent reenered the United Sates wihoadmission or parole (Exh. )

On April 2, 200 he Speror Cor, Sae of Arizona, Conty of Maricopa,convicted the responden of two feony conts of Criminal Impersonation, in vioaion ofsecions -200, 206, 7 702, a - o he rizona Revise Statues("A.R.S.) (Bond Exh. 5) s a res, the cour sentenced him o ur monsimprisonmen on one cont; i senenced him o .75 years probaion on the oher count.(Id.)



On Apil 8, 200, the Depatment paced the espondet in emoval poceedigsthogh the issance of a Notice to Appea ("NTA) and chaged him with emovailitynde section 22(a)(6)(A)(i) of the mmigatio and ationaity Act ("Act o "A),aie pesent in the United States withot admission o paoe.

On Jne 2, 200, the espondent appeaed with conse ee the immigationcot in Floence, Arizona a scheded ond edetermination heaing. At that time, heeqested that the co take "no action and indicated that he wod seek ond at a atedate.

On ne 23, 200, the espodet appeaed with consel ee the co anothe cstody edetemiation heaing At that time, he claimed that his Apil 2, 200Ciminal mpesonation conviction is not a cime involving moal tpitde, and agedthat he is not sject to mandatoy detention nde A sectio 236(c). The espondentadded that he is not a dange to the commnity o a ight isk, and noted that his onlyciminal oense is noviolent. n addition, the espondent stated that he is the the of

thee United States citizen childen angig in age om seven to sixteen yeas andclaimed that his edest chid ses om seizes e added that his spose does noteside in the United States egay and explained that, pio to his detention, he woked asa manage a siness i Phoeix ast, the espodent stated that he owns a vehicleand has a ank accont and noted that, if eeased, he wi eside with his miy

In sppot, the espondent smitted a od woksheet (Bond Exh); a copy of aSepteme 3, 993 Ceicate of ive Bih om the State of Aizona earing the name"Gari MoMotanez Amado (id; a copy of an Agst 5, 997 Cetication ofVital Recod om the State of Aizona eaing the name "Yhaneth RiveaMotanez(id; a copy of a Septeme 3, 2003 Ceticate of ive Bih om the State of Aizona

eaing the name "Gissel Rivea-Montanez (id; copies of medical ecods omAizona Childens eoogy eaing the ame "Gai Amado, dated Api 9 200(id; and, a copy of an Aizona Ceticate of Title a 999 Fod Mstang egisteed to"Maco Atonio RiveaCailo (id

The espondent aso aged that A.R.S. section 32006, the Aizoa ciminaimpesonation statte, is not categoically a cime involving moal tpitde. n doig so,he dispted that AR.S section 3-2006(A)(3) eqies ad The espondent added that,as the cimina cor did not covict him of a patica ssectio nde A.R.S. sectio32006, the immigation co cold not appy the modied categoical appoach todetemine whethe he committed a cime ivoving moa tpitde

In esponse, the Depamet aged that the espondents 20 0 Cimiampesonation convictio is categorically a cime ivolvig moal tpitde, and cited tothe Attoey Geneas opiion in Matter o/Silva-Trevino, 24 & Dec. 687 (AG 2008)n sppot, the Depament noted that the esentence Investigation epot ("S)associated with his oense, as we as police epots, indicate that the espondet sedanothe pesons social secity nme to otain employment, and ding contacts withpolice, ove the past twelve yeas The docments add that the victim, now eighteen,

2



discoveed he espondens decei when she expeienced dicy oaining sdenloans coege. She hen had o have he cedi xed, as wel as cear he poice ecodassociaed wih he social seciy cad. As a esl he Deparmen aged ha heesponden is sec o mandaory deenon psan o NA secon 236(c)().

In sppo he Deparmen smied a copy of a Fom 23, "Recod ofnadmissile/Deporale Alien, eaing he name "Marco Anonio RiveaCarillo(Bond Exh. 2). aso smied convicion ecods and eaed docmens associaedwih he espondens Api 2 200 Cimina mpesonaion convicion These incdeda copy of a Diec Compain led in he Sperio Cor Sae of Arizona Cony ofMarcopa earing he name "Maco A. Rivea-Carrilo (Bond Exh. 3); a copy of aProae Case Saemen, earing he name "Maco Anonio Rivea-Carillo (Id) acopy of an nmaon ed in he Speo Co Sae of Arizona Cony of Maricopa,eaing he name "Maco Anono Rivea-Caillo (Id) a copy of anInciden/nvesigaion Repor pepaed y he Mesa, Arizona Poice Deparmen, eainghe name "Maco Anonio Rivea-Carrillo (I); a copy of an Apil 2 200 Senence of

mpisonmen docmen om he Speo Cor Sae of Aizona, Cony of Maicopa,earing he name "Maco Anonio RiveaCarro (eaing o con one) (Bond Exh. 5);a copy of an Apil 2, 200 Sspension of Senence Unspervised Proaion docmenom he Speio Cor, Sae of Aizona Cony of Maicopa, eaing he name "MacoAnonio RveaCarrio (eaing o con wo) (id) a copy of an Ode of Connemendocmen om he Speio Co Sae of Azona, Cony of Macopa eaing hename "Maco Anonio RiveaCarrillo (id) a copy of an Resiion edge Reqes inehalf of vicim Ashey Zolinge ("Zollinge), eaing he name "Maco AnonioRvea-Carrillo (id) a copy of a Pesenence Repo om he Spero Cor Sae ofAizona Cony of Marcopa, earing he name "Marco Anonio RveaCarrio andassociaed wih he esponden's Api 2 200 Ciminal Impesonaon convicion (id)

and, a copy of a Pea Ageemen om he Speio Cor, Sae of Arizona Cony ofMaicopa, eang he name "Marco Anonio Rivea-Carillo (i).

A he concsion of he heaing, he cor conined he mae o Jly 5, 200in ode o povide he Depamen wih an opponiy o oain anscips of he pleacolloqy.

A he conined ly 5, 200 heaing he Depamen noied he co ha iwas nae o oain anscips of he pea cooqy associaed wih he espondensCimina mpesonaion convicion As a esl, he cor deermined ha he espondenis no sjec o mandaory deenion and odeed him eleased on ond in he amon of$5000. n doing so he cor povided he paies wih a Bond Memoandm earng hename "Dogas Alero Chavez, (Bond Exh. 6), and indicaed ha i adeqaey saedis posiion in his case. he cor added ha A.R.S. secion 3-2006 is a divisie seand saed ha i elieved ha A.R.S. secions 32006(A)() and (2) dene oenses haconsie cimes involving moal pide. oweve i explained ha A.R.S secion32006(A)(3) does no do so. Accodng o he cor he Deparmens docmenyevidence iled o iden he ssecion ha he esponden ped giy o. Frhe, iconcded ha Mtter f Sil Trevin does no allow i o ely on condc descied in

3



he PS and police epors as pa of is anaysis ecause could no e ceain ha washe conduc ha he cina cou ased he espondens convcion on. TheDepamen eseved appea and heey sumis is mey Noice of Appeal

LA AD ANALYSS

The Boad of Iigaon Appeals ("Boad o "BA) eviews cuadeennaions of he mgaion cout unde he "ceay eoneous sandad. 8 C.F.R.§ 003. (d)(3)() (2005); Matte ofRSH 23 &N Dec. 625 637 (BA 2003)(discussng he "ceay eroneous sandad of evew).

"A nding s cleay eoneous when ahough hee s evdence o suppot heevewng cou on he ene evdence s e wh he denie and convicion ha amsake has een comed United States United Saes Gpsum Co: �33 U.S. 364

395(948.) "A c nding may no e oveued sipy ecause he Boad woud haveweighed he evdence deeny o decded he cs dieeny had een hecnde Boad of gaon Appeas: Pocedua Res o mpove CaseManagemen 67 Fed. Reg. 54878 54899 (Aug. 26 2002) (Suppemenay nrmaion)(ciing Andeson Ci ofBesseme 470 U.S. 564 573 (985))

The Boad evews quesions of law dsceon and judgen and a ohe ssuesn appeals om decsions of he mgaon cou de noo 8 C.F.R. § 003.(d)(3)(i)

NA secion 236(c) povdes n petnen pat as ows:

CUSTODY. The Aoey Genea shall ae ino cusody anyaien who

(A) is inadmsse y eason of having comied any oense coveedn secon 22(a)(2) (emphass added)

(B) s depoale y eason of having commed any oense coveed nsecion 237(a)(2)(A)() (A)() (B) (C) o (D)

(C) is depotae unde secon 237(a)(2)(A)(i) on he ass of an oense which he aien has een senence[d] o a e of mpisonmen of a

eas yea o

(0) s namsse ne secon 22(a)(3)(B) o depotae ndesecon 237(a)(4)(B) when he alen s eeased whou egad o whehehe alen s eleased on paoe supevsed eeased o poaion andwhou egad o whehe he alen may e aesed o mpisoned agan he same oense.

4



INA section 236(c) reqires mandatoy detention o a criminal alien ihe isreleased om cstody aer Octoer , 99, the ast day that the Transition Rles werein eect. 1 Mtter Adei 22 . & N. Dec. 102 (BA 1999); see ls CFR. §003. l 9(h)(2)(D) (2007). This reqirement applies to an aien who is not immediatey

taken into cstody y imigration ocials when reeased om incarceration. Mtter Ktlir 24 & Dec. 124 (BA 2007); Mtter Rjs, 23 &N Dec. 7 (BA 2001 );tter West 22 &N Dec. 405 (BA 2000).

The Depatment need not charge an aien with the grond that povides the asisr mandatory detention nder A section 236(c)( ). Mtter Ktir, 24 &N Dec. at27 (BA 2007). However the Department mst give the alien notice o thecircmstances or convictions that provide the asis r mandatory detention and anoppotnity to chalenge the mandatory detention ere the immigration cort dring aond redetermination hearing. d

For prposes o determining cstody conditions nder A section 236, an alienwi not e considered "propery inclded in a mandatory detention category when thecort or Board o Immigration Appeas ("Board or "BA) nds, on the asis o theond record as a whoe, that it is sstantially nikey that the Depatment will prevaion a charge o removaiity specied in INA section 236(c)(1 ). See Mtter Jseph 22I. & N. Dec. 799, 02, 0 (BA 999) C.F.R.§ 003. 9(h)(2)(ii).

d

According to INA section 2 2(a)(2)(A)(i)(),

Any aien who has een convicted o, or who admits having committed, orwho admits committing acts which constitte the essential elements o a

crime invoving mora trpitde (other than a prely politica oense) oran attept or conspiracy to commit sch a crime is inadmissie.

Mora trpitde is a nelos concept, which rers generaly to condct that isinherently ase, vile, or depraved, and contrary to the accepted rles o moraity and thedties owed etween persons or to society in gene. See Jrd De Gere, 341 US.223, 229 (95); see ls Mtter Olqui, 23 &N Dec. 96 (BA 2006) (moratpitde rers generally to condct that is inherenty ase, vie, or depraved, andcontrary to the accepted rles o moraity and the dties owed etween persons or to

society in general); Mtter TrresVrel 23 & Dec. 7, 3 (BIA 200)(moraltrpitde has ong een the sject o interpretation, and its precise meaning has nevereen y setted; Mtter /Tr, 2 I&N Dec. 29 292 BIA 996 (citing tter Frkli, 20 & N Dec 67 (BIA 994)); Mtter LV, 22 & Dec. 594, 600 (BA

See also Section 303(b)(2) of the ea Immaion en and Imiant esponsbiy Act of996 Division "C of Pub L No 0208 0 Sta 300956 3009586 (IIA) which povdeshat he povisons of INA § 236(c) sha no appy o individuas eeased ae: Octobe 8 1998 the dae on which he Tansion ues expied

5



1999) (moral turpiude has been dened as an act which s pr s moray reprehensbleand ntrnsicay wrong or mum in s, so t is the nature of the act itsef and not thestauto prohbiton of t which renders a crime one of mora turpitude); rd INS,12 F3d 919, 921 (9th Cir 1993) (noting that courts have described mora turpiude ingenera tes as "an act of baseness or depravty contrary to accepted mora standards

(uoting urrro d Nodhl INS, 407 F2d 1405, 1406 (9th Cir 1969)), and asbascay oensve to Amercan ethcs and accepted moral standards (quoting Csl INS, 541 F2d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir 1976)))

n order to etermine whether a convcton is r a crme nvolving moraturpitude, the courts have applied the categorical and modied categorical approachesestablished by the United States Supreme Cort Nrro-Lopz onzls 503 F3d1063, 1067 (9th Cir2007)(cting Tylor Unid Ss, 495 US 575 (1990) (directngcourts to rst make a categorca comparison of the eements of the statute of convctonto the generic denton, and decide whether the conduct proscrbed is broader than, andso does not categoricay within, this generic denition); Shprd Unid Ss,

544 US 13, 26 (2005)(mting evdentary nqury under oded categorica approachto the tes of the charging document, the terms of a pea agreement or transcrpt ofcooquy between udge and defendant n which the ca basis r the pea wasconrmed by the defendant, or to some comparabe judcal record))

Empoying these approaches n Cus-spr, the inth Circut Cort ofAppeas concluded that the act of entering a structure "s not tself base, vie ordepraved, and that it s the particuar crime that accompanies the act of entry thatdetermines whether the oense is one involving mora tuitude Cusspr onzls, 430 F3d at 1019 (9th Cir 2005) Signicanty, the nth Crcuit decidedCus-spr pror to the Attoeys Genera carcaton of the term "crme nvoving

mora turptude n Mr of Sil-Trino, 24 & Dec 687 (AG 2008)

n Mr ofSil-Trino, the Attoey General reected the appcation of theTylorShprd anayical amework n the context of moral turpude detenatons nvor of the "reastc probabiliy test adopted by the Supreme Court n onzlz uns-Alrz, 549 S 183 (2007) Sil-Trino, 24 & Dec at 687 TheAttoey General explaned,

[n evaluating whether an aens pror oense s categoricaly one thatnvolved mora turpitude, mmigraton judges shoud determne whetherthere is a "reastc probability, not a theoretca possbty, that a State or

Federa crmna statute would be applied to reach conduct that does notinvove moral turptude

Unde N secion 03(a)( ) and 8 C.FR § 0033(d)() (2008), a deenaion and un y he oey Genea wh espec o a quesons of aw sha e conoin

In poceedins unde IN secion 22, he buden is on he aien o demonsae ha his convicion sno caeoicay a cime nvovin moa upiude.

6



Id (citing nzalz Dunas-Alarz 549 US. at 93 (2007)).

The Attoey Genera added,

To uali as a crime invoving mora trpitde r puoses of the

mmigration and Nationaity Act, a crime must invove bothreprehensibe conduct and sm dr sinr, whetherspecic intent, deiberateness, willlness, or recklessness.

Id (emphasis added).

Id

Last, the Attoey Genera instrcted,

To determine whether a conviction is r a crime invoving moraturpitde, immigration jdges and the Board of mmigrationAppeals shold () ook to the statte of conviction nder the

categorical iniry and determine whether there is a reaisticprobabiity that the State or Federa crimina statte pursuant towhich the aien was convicted wold be applied to reach condctthat does not involve mora trpitde (2) if the categorical inirydoes not resove the uestion, engage in a modied categoricainiry and examine the record of conviction, incuding docmentssuch the indictment, the judent of conviction, juryinstuctions, a signed gity plea, and te pea transcript and (3) ifthe record of conviction is inconcsive, consider any additionaevidence deemed necessay or appropriate to resove accratey themoral trpitude estion.

In this case, the Sperior Co, State of Arizona, County of Maricopa, convictedthe respondent of Criminal Impersonation, a cass six ony, in vioation of AR.S.sections 3-200, 32006, 3-70, 3702, and 3-80 As a rest, the cor sentencedhim to r months imprisonent on one cont it sentenced him to .75 yearsprobation on the other cont.

According to A.RS. section 3-2006,

A A person commits crimina impersonation by:

. Assming lse identity wt ntnt t dau' another or2 Pretending to be a representative of some person or organization

with inn t daud or

4 A crime that has as a element the intent to defud nvolves mo turptude McNughton v. INS,62 F 2d 234, 235 (9th Cr 1978) (cting Jordn v DeGeorge, 34US.223 227-32 (195) .

7



3 Petendng to be, or assumng a se identt of, empoee o arepesentative of some person o oganizaton with inen indueanothe person to provide or to aow access to propert Thisparagraph does not app to peace ocers in the perrmance oftheir duties

Id emphasis added)

Subsection B) adds that crimna mpesonation is a cass 6 feon I

Subsections A)), A)2), ad A)3) a incude a specic intent, namel theinen deud subsections A)) ad A)2)) and the inen indue subsectionA)3)) Thus, the statute, in is enie, satses the sciente requiement dscussed nilTein Although subsecton A)3) does not ncude the words, "intent todeaud, one ma, nonetheess, age that t descibes such a purpose though tslaguage Indeed, the Ninth Cct has hed that a cime can nvolve "auduent

conduct, and thus s a crime involving mora turpitude, f intent to deaud s impliiin he nue of the cime Bln Musey, 518 F3d 714, 718, 719 9th Cir 2008)emphass added) quoting Gdeshein IN, 8 F3d 645, 648 9th Cir 1993)) "]ntentto deaud is impict in the natue of the crime when the ndividua mkes lse

semens n order to procure something of value, either monetar or non-moneta Idemphs added); see ls Me hni, 24 &N Dec 128, 13031 BA 2007)explaining that, although "crimes that have a specic intent to deaud as an elementhave awas been und to invove moral tuitude, [the Boad has aso und thatcertain cmes are herentl auduent and invove moral turptude even though the canbe committed wthout a specc intent to defaud, where a convicton equies poof thatthe dendant willll o knowing committed an act that causes "signicant societa

harm)

Hee, the ntent to deceive, which necessaril invoves an ntent to deaud,appears to be an ndispensabe eement of subsecton A)3) Specicall, subsectonA)3) eiteates acts described in subsections A)) and A)2) that involve decet oticker ie, "assuming a lse identit ad "petending to be) Futhe, and as acoroar, ike subsections A)) and A)2), subsecton A)3) involves repehensibleconduct ndeed, in oder to within the ambit of this subsection, the perpetatopretends to be, or assumes a se identit, in order to indue anothe person to provde orto aow access to propert These actions, as noted, invove the intent to deceve whchnecessari invoves the intent to deaud Theere, because subsecton A)3)

"contans an inheent intent to deceve o msead and because moral turptude nheres inthe crmina intent, the respondent's conduct is "inherent wrong and morallepehensible, not mee prohibited b ue o ecent oiin Me , 6 &Dec 795, 798 BA 1955)

These cts estabish that ARS section 32006A)3) descibes acts thatconstitute a categorcal crime involve mora tupitude ee Jdn e Gee, 341US 223, 232 1951) "he phase crme invoving moa turpitude has without

8



excepo bee cosed o ebace audue codc; Cu-G Gzl43 F3d 3 08 9h C 2005 sae Bl 58 F3d a 78 "The SpeeCo as ed ha ces ha vove ad caegocall l o he deo oces vovg oa upude; M LVC 22 & Dec 94 BA 999og ha ces vovg aud ae "geea cosdeed ces vovg oa

ude; M Fl 7 & Dec 225 228 BIA 980 "[Whee aud s soexrcabl wove o he sae as o ceal be a gede o he ce ecessa voves oa rpde C M 2 IN Dec 579 BA992 hodg ha m i o egal docues, wihu i o se schdocues audulel o uall s no a ce volvg oa pde

The espode's covc s aso a ce volvg oa de de heoded caegoca appoach The avalabe doces copsg e espode'secod o covco do o ece a cs o esablsh he specc codc ha he pedgul o o Ap 2 2 Wee he ecod o covco does o esolve he oal pude qu cors a oo o doces ousde e ma ecod o covco

o deee whee e ale's ce aca voved oal pude ili 24 IN Dec a 69899 ee boh he PSI ad e poce epos assocaedwh he espodes 200 lo Cal Ipesoao covco dcae ha heespode used aohe peso's socal secu ube o oba eploe addug coacs wh polce ove he pas welve eas The doces add ha hevc ow eghee dscoveed espode's dece whe se expeeced dcuobag sde loas colege The espode's acos ced he o x he cedad o cea he ecod assocaed wh he socal secur cad Sgcal he eporesablshes ha he espode's oese volved a deabe vc

Usg aohe pesos pesoa deg ao ode o llega

oba eploe a agbe bee o vale s decepve ad s heee heelaudule Bac's Law Dcoa 8h ed 2004 deg aud as "a] owgsepeseao o he h o coceale o a aeal c o duce anohe o ac ohs o he dee The espode's coduc dced a eploe o ac o s owdee because exposed he eploe o ossbe lab hg a dvdualwho c has o egal ahozao o wo he Ued Saes , 8 USC§324a pohbg eploes o hg uauhozed aes he espode's ces also ha o soe ha he oo a job ha wod have ohewse bee avaabe a Ued Saes cze law pemae esde o ohe dvdual wh legaauhozao o wo he Ued Saes M H 8 & Dec 203267 BIA 982 og ha uauhozed epoe ca egave pac he

Aeca wo ce; 8 USC§ 82a5A equg a aes eeg heUed Saes o wo us oba abo cecao esabshg ha "hee ae osue woes wo ae abe ll uale a avalable a he e oappcao ad a he place whee e ale s o pe such sed o sedlabo ad ha "he eploe o such ale wl o advese aec he wages adwog codos o woes he Ued Saes slal eploed

9



Signiantl the inth Ciuit's deision in BltnTid v IN 23 F3d1 79 (9th Ci 2000) is ea distinguishabe o the espondent's ase n that ase aout onvited the aien of "se epesenting a soia seuit nube in vioation of 2 USC § 08(g)(2) now eodied at 42 USC§ 08(a)(7)(B) id at 182hen the e migation and atuaization Sevie ("Sevie o "S) oved to

deport Betan in 1993 she appied peanent esident status unde the "egisstaute 8 USC§ 259 The iigation out howeve deied he appliationbeause it und that he onvition was a ie invoving oa tupitude that peludedhe o eeting the statuto equieent of good oal haate id at 183The inth Ciuit howeve disageed i at 18-85

n eahing its deision the ourt examined a 1990 statuto aendent to 2USC§ 408 whih povided that aiens who had been ganted peanent esident statusunde the anest o egist statutes wee exepted o poseution etain pastuses of lse soial seuit nubes inuding using a se soial seuit nube toobtain eploent whih esuts in eligibilit soia seut benets i at

11838 n8 Reling on a ongessiona onene epot aopaning the statutoaendent in whih Congess indiated that "individul pidd xmptin m

putin und thi ppl shoud not be onsideed to have exhibited oauitude with espet to the exepted ats puposes of deteinations ade b theIS the Nint Ciuit onuded that Betan's use of a se soia seuit ubedid not invove oa tupitude I at 84 (ephasis added) The Ninth Ciuit notedthat "Betan was not exepted o poseution unde§ 08(d) but the onl eason ths was "that he ies wee oitted a w wees too late and she had aead beenonvited of the Id

n a dissenting opinion Ciuit Judge John T oonan wote

The ourt eahes ve to pem a ind deed t eads eaning intotwo statutes that Congess has not insibed thee and it goes on toattibute to the Boad a otive that the Boad does not atiuate Beltaneeded a soia seuit nube to ive in the United States But when sheaused toube the nube's owne and was ased to stop she didnot Not to ention that the Boad's intepetation of a statuto teshould onto it was not an uneasonabe exeise of disetion theBoad to den he elief

Id at 86

The statuto amendent and egisative histo that the inth Ciuit eied uponin BltnTid appies on to aien who wee anted aw peanent eidentstatus unde the anest o egist statutes 42 USC§ 408(e) The t thatCongess hose to gat one ass of aiens exeption o poseution eai atsand to dee suh ats not oa tupitudinous tht ass of aliens does notneessail ean that suh ats do not ineent invove oa tupitude ndeed tatConess felt a need to eate an exeption eain aliens suggest that aiens who

0



·.

outsde the exempton categor ho have used a se soca secrt number wuld beconsdered to have coitted moral turptude As discussed above use of anoterpersons soca securit umber s mora turpitudnous due to the deception and fraudthat are nherent the oense

otab te respodent s ot ithn the class of alies described n 42 USC §408(e He s ot a permanet resdent; rather he s charged as an ale ho entered thented States ithout inspecton Moreover unke Betran the respodent has notapplied r registr hus the reasong of BltrnTird s nappicable to this case

he Nth Crcut's recent publshed decso n Tni v. ldr 598 F3d 6479th Cir 2010) her dilutes the BltrnTird holding In that case the cour hed thatan aens convctos r obtang credt through se meas ncudng subsson ofctitous socia securit numbers consttute crmes nvovig mora turpitude The courtexpained

Credit s toda the most despread meas of acquring eath n thscountr To suppose that it s not aud to tr to tap ito ths ealth b iess to gnore the ecoomc eemets of the mode orld Credt card notaud? o n the mode Unted States t is the paradig of aud

Id at 648

The nth Crcuit added that ntent to repa back the audulet obtained credts no dense rather the ntent of the audster s ev to get hat he has no right toget Id at 651 Last t stated the credtor ho s nduced through msrepresetatonsto gve credit suers measurabe and reseeable harm the moment the credtor enters

nto te transaction ith the audster I at 652

Whe the respondet n this case has not been convcted of credt card audmuch of the rationae that the Nnth Circuit used n Tni is reevant and appicable

Based on these cts the cour erred as a matter of a he t determned thatthe respondents oense is not a cre vovng moral turptude exercsed jurisdctoover his custod conditos and ordered him reeased on bod n the amount of $5000

IV

COCLUSION

For te regong reasos te Deartmet respetl reests tat e Boardsusta ts appea vacate the mgraton cours ul 15 2010 decision and order therespondent hed in the Departmets custod ithout bond pedng resoution of hsreova proceedngs

marco antonio rivera carrillo, a200 607 697 (bia april 22, 2011)

Documents