marcel chelba - comments on an article by david tong in scientific amertican: “is quantum reality...

Upload: marcel-chelba

Post on 04-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Marcel Chelba - Comments on an article by David Tong in Scientific Amertican: Is Quantum Reality Analog after A

    1/3

    Marcel Chelba

    Comments on an article by David Tong in Scientific

    Amertican:

    Is Quantum Reality Analog after All?

    Quantum theorists often speak of the world as being pointillist

    at the smallest scales. Yet a closer look at the laws of nature

    suggests that the physical world is actually continuousmoreanalog than digital.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-quantum-

    reality-analog-after-all

    13. kantinomus 07:54 AM 11/27/12

    I think we will not be able to overcome this dilemma until we

    understand "what it means to know" and "if reality is

    intelligible or not" unless "the very essence of reality is to be

    unintelligible".

    If "scientific knowledge is only a hermeneutics of empirical

    experience" (as I argue, as an extension of Kantian

    epistemology and of Copenhagen School), the "continuous"

    and "discrete" are not two "complementary aspects of reality

    but only two "complementary paradigms of our faculty of

    representation", ie two "matrix" (grids of interpretation),

    substantially diffent, which we apply alternative to reality,

    1

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/author.cfm?id=4094http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-quantum-reality-analog-after-allhttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-quantum-reality-analog-after-allhttp://www.scientificamerican.com/author.cfm?id=4094http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-quantum-reality-analog-after-allhttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=is-quantum-reality-analog-after-all
  • 7/29/2019 Marcel Chelba - Comments on an article by David Tong in Scientific Amertican: Is Quantum Reality Analog after A

    2/3

    based on our empirical data, to obtain predictions the smallest

    margin of error.

    They give us the illusion that they were part of the very flesh of

    reality because of their local and temporary success in our

    empirical experiments.

    Reality is neither "continuous" nor "discrete". Depending on

    how we cut reality, and the microscope through which we look,

    "physical reality" answer us "as if" should be "continuous" or"discrete", but we can not afford this illusion only because

    margin of error in our representation is, for the moment, within

    acceptable limits.

    "Standard model" will necessarily be a compromise between

    these two "mathematical paradigms". If this compromise is

    impossible, it means that we are condemned to endlessly

    troubled by this dilemma and that physical reality will smileforever, enigmatic, outside all our scientific theories, as will be

    fine.

    In other words, I move this "dilemma of physics to the

    domain of epistemology because it's not only of physics, but

    of our entire scientific knowledge.

    "Epistemological dilemma" that I raise is whether "empirical

    reality" choose her "model of interpretation " or our "model of

    interpretation" choose his "empirical reality"?

    I have this problem more fully theorized in chapter "Dilemma

    and method of metaphysics" in my book "Critical Introduction.

    2

  • 7/29/2019 Marcel Chelba - Comments on an article by David Tong in Scientific Amertican: Is Quantum Reality Analog after A

    3/3

    On the possibility of metaphysics as a science in the

    perspective of Kant's critical philosophy "(2004).

    Is available on Scribd, in Romanian. In English, only a small

    fragment.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-

    tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-

    Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kant

    3

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kanthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kanthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kanthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kanthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kanthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/17474184/Marcel-Chelba-Kantian-tetralogy-Vol-I-Critical-Introduction-About-the-possibility-of-Metaphysics-as-Science-in-the-critical-philosophy-of-Kant