"mapping the specificity of neutralizing hiv immune sera"
DESCRIPTION
"Mapping the Specificity of Neutralizing HIV Immune Sera". -mAbs -HIV+ patient sera -vaccine sera. Aim:. What specificities underlie HIV+ patient sera neutralization?. Challenges: *polyclonal *distinguishing neutralizing and non-neutralizing fractions. Mapping methods. Neutralization - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
"Mapping the Specificity of Neutralizing HIV Immune Sera"
-mAbs-HIV+ patient sera-vaccine sera
Aim:What specificities underlieHIV+ patient sera neutralization?
Challenges:*polyclonal*distinguishing neutralizing and non-neutralizing fractions
Neutralizationmechanism Native PAGE
Mapping methods
HIV neutralizing antibodiesb12 overlaps CD4 binding site
2G12binds high mann.
2F5, 4E10, Z13(MPER region of gp41)
gp120
gp41
Assay b12 2G12 2F5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
concentration (µg/ml)
BBB
B
B
B
BB
B
B
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
BBBBB
B
B
BB
B
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
concentration (µg/ml)
E
E
E
EEE
E
EE
E
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
EEEEE
E
E
EE
E
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.00010.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 50
concentration (µg/ml)
Crooks et al. Human Antibodies 14:101 (2005)Binley et al J.Virol. 77:5678 (2003)
Behavior of mAbs in different neutralization assay formats
Anti-gp120 Anti-gp41
J
JJJJJJ
J
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.0010.01 0.1 1 10 50
B
BB
BB
B
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.01 0.1 1 10 50
EEEEE
E
EE
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.01 0.1 1 10 50
standard
post-CD4/CCR5
Mapping HIV+ plasma neutralization
*Lack of post-CD4/CCR5 neutralization indicates mostly - gp120 neutralization (not - gp41)
IC50 titer: human plasma gp120 titer standard post-CD4/CCR5
<50 N308 250,000 9,000 <4050-300 #11H 500,000 1,000 <40
300-1000 L92 1,000,000 400 <401000-3000 L909 1,500,000 320 <40
>3000 R2 600,000 150 <40739 80,000 100 <40A62 100,000 100 <40
TN15 603,000 64 40J864 248,000 50 <40N160 500,000 <40 <40K370 381,000 <40 <40TN11 119,000 <40 <40L503 612,000 <40 <40HIV- <300 <40 <40
spiked human plasmaJ864 248,000 50 <40
J864+b12 N.D. 950 <10J864+2G12 N.D. 120 <10J864+2F5 N.D. 110 71
format
Crooks et al. Human Antibodies 14:101-113 (2005)
Neutralizationmechanism Native PAGE
Native PAGE trimer binding assay
P.Moore et al. J.Virol. 80:2515-2528 (2006)
trimer
mAb (-) b12 b6 2G12 447D P7 X5 HIVIG 2F5 Z13 T2 T3epitope CD4bs CD4bs mann. V3 C1 CD4i gp41 gp41 gp41 gp41
Infer: trimer binding directly correlates with neutralization
2G12 and soluble CD4
[ligand]
soluble CD4(trimer IC50=0.3ug/mlneut IC50=0.8ug/ml)
(-) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 µg/ml
2G12(trimer IC50=0.3ug/mlneut IC50=0.5ug/ml)
µg/ml(-) 0.3 1 3 10 30 100
*3 x 2G12's bind per trimer*direct correlation to trimer binding and neutralization IC50s*2G12 saturates over a large concentration range; sCD4 is "all or none" (co-operative?)
[ligand]
Z13 (anti-gp41)(trimer IC50=3ug/mlneut IC50=45ug/ml)
Comparison of 2G12 and Z13[ligand]
2G12(trimer IC50=0.3ug/mlneut IC50=0.5ug/ml)
µg/ml(-) 0.3 1 3 10 30 100
[ligand]
(-) 0.3 1 3 10
*trimer binding is more sensitive than neutralization for detecting anti-gp41 AbsPerhaps more gp41 Ab required before neut effect (3x Abs)?
Trimer shifts are mediated by neutralizing plasmas
-neut IC501/plasma diln - 10 100 1,000 10 100 1000
N308 L503<1:401:3,000
V E K L W V T V Y Y G V P
EP
KI
GL
V A P
K A K R RT R
V
Q E KRVV
V
C
FM
A
ND
S
V
K
K
Y
Y
Y
L
L
EE
SR
R
R
RW
W
WV
V
N
N
D
D
D
D
M
G
GGG
P
P
P
F
I
I
E
E
W
A
T
T
T
T T T
G
GG
G
N
N
N
N
I I
ID
DL
LL
L
T
T
T
P PI
I
S
SS
C
C
CR
R
R
Q
Q
Q
Y
Y
Y
A
A
AA
A
KK
F
F
F
E
E
E
V V
V
Q
HH
W
WC
C
AA
A
A
P
P
P
P
P
T
T
T
T
S
S
N
N
V
V
VV
L
L
L
NN
E
E
E
H
H
H
KK
K
V
N
NN
M
M
M
Q
I
D
D
D
S
S
SQ
C
L
L
L
C
C
C
C
K
K
K K
C
V
V
N
N
T
TT
TT
N
E
E
E
E
G
G
G
G
I
I
I
N
N
N
L
L
L
F
F
F
F
T
T T RR
D
D
D
Q
Q
Q
E
E
E
V
II
I
I
C
NN
S
SS
S
S
Y
Y
Y
Y
D
D
D
D
D
VV
V
V
T
T
T
T
T
A
AA
A
P
PI
P
P
P
P
P
P
K
K
K
K
K
K
II
I
II
I
C
C
N
N
N
G
G
G
G
G
L
L
L
LL L
L
R
R
R
R
R
V
VV
VV
V
S
SS
S
S
E
E
E E
K
F
F
F
Q
FT
T
TT N
NN
N
N N
A
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
S
I
I
II
I
K
K
K
K
H
H
H
C C
C
T
T
T
G
GG
GG
EE
EE
E
E
I
I
II
R
RR
N
N
N
N
N
S
S
S S
S
W
W
D T
V
V
VI
K
K
KT
I
I
I
M
MM H G
F
FF
N
N
N
NL
L
T
P
T
T
G
G
G
TNN
NN
E
E
R
I
A
40
50
NH2 490
500
COOH
complex
high mannose
V5
C4
V4
V3
V2
V1
C1
C2
C5
C3
420
370
170
180
200
290
340
380
430
460
150
E
L
W
G
V
E
IL
V
A
A
R
R
Q
K
V
N
K
Y
Y
L
E
S
R
R
R
W
D
D
M
G
G
G
G
I
E
T
T
I
G
G
G
G
NN
N
Y
I
I
D
D
L
L
L
L
T
T
T
I
S
C
R
R
Q
Q
Y
A
A
A
A
A
K
K
F
E
E
E
V
V
V
W
C
A
A
P
T
S
V
V
L
N
K
N
N
M
D
N
T
T
T
T
N
E
G
A
K
M
G
Q
Q
Q
Q
L
L
Q
Q
L
LN
Q
Q
S
S
L L L
Q
Q
L
L
L
S
F
F
I
G
A
A
A
W
W
S
S
I
I
M
W
W
W
M
I
S
S
L
LI
E
Q
Q
E
E
E
LLL
W
W
W
W
590
600
A
620
610
NH2
670
Gp120 and gp41 mutations in Env trimers.
∆2G12
∆b12
∆2F5/4E10
gp120 gp41
Shifts of 2G12 and b12 knockout trimers
EnvmAb (-) 2G12 b12 sCD4 (-) 2G12 b12 sCD4 (-) 2G12 b12 sCD4
WT Δ2 12G Δ 12b
E EE
EE
E
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
mAb conc (ug/ml)
b12
E 2G12
E E E E E E
0
10000
20000
30000
mAb conc (ug/ml)
b12
E 2G12
EE E
E E
E
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
mAb conc (ug/ml)
b12
E 2G12
WT Δ2G12 Δb12
(295 mutant) (368 mutant)
N308 plasma binding to 2G12 and b12 “knockout” trimers
(-) b12 (-) b12N308 titrate N308 titrate
*368 (∆b12) mutant knocks out most of HIV+ plasma (N308) neutralization.
....BUT: a fraction of trimer binding doesn’t overlap the b12 epitope
N308 titrate(-) b12 Fab fixed @ 30ug/ml
...i.e. something completely different? Gp41 Abs?
Summary
b12
2G12
2F5/4E10
Neutralizing HIV+ plasma:-368-sensitive-but not all b12 overlapping
?
Plans…
*Make additional point mutants*Make clade A, B, C trimers *Investigate vaccine sera
Thanks
Dennis Burton
Emma Crooks, Phenix JiangDevin Shrestha
Doug Richman
NICDLynn MorrisPenny Moore
James Robinson