map-21 (moving ahead for progress in the 21 st century act) november 19, 2012 map-21 overview:...

MAP-21(Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act)

November 19, 2012

MAP-21 Overview:

Jeffrey B. Bell

Illinois Dept. of Transportation

Bureau of Policy and Federal Affairs

This PowerPoint will be updated as information becomes available.

MAP-21 + Illinois =

Funding for a good multi-modal

Transportation System in Illinois

An Equation for Success

Professor Rhodes

3

MAP-21 OverviewProvides authorizations for 27 months – thru end of FFY

2014 (9/30/14)

Authorizes a total of $105 billion over FFYs 2013 – 2014 = funding at current levels + inflationary increase

FFY 2012 funding “annualized” per ¾ funding already distributed to the states

FFY 2013 and 2014 authorized per new MAP-21 programs – No formula apportionment factors

4

MAP-21 Overview

SAFETEA-LU (FFYs 2005-2009) expired on September 30, 2009

10 Short-term extensions were needed to continue funding for transportation programs

The Short-term extensions covered: FFYs 2010, 2011 and 3/4 of 2012

MAP-21 signed into law on: 7/6/12 (PL 112-141)

MAP-21 effective date of 10/1/12

5

MAP-21 Overview

No earmarks and no rescissions

Does not provide the funding “guarantees” of TEA-21 and SAFETEA-LU

Essentially no equity program to benefit Illinois or any donor state – but Illinois retains healthy %

Does not address the long-term disparity between HTF receipts / highway / transit outlays, but bill fully funded thru FFY 2014

Apportions over 92% to formula programs vs. 83% in SAFETEA-LU

6

MAP-21 Overview

Highway Programs

Highway Safety Programs

Motor Carrier Safety Programs

Transit Programs

Misc. programs – no rail programs – Note: (The Passenger Rail Investment and

Improvement Act “PRIIA” expires 9/30/13)

7

MAP-21 Overview

Amounts are estimated

Highways Research Safety Transit TotalFFY 2012 (Annualized) 40.185 0.400 1.213 10.458 52.256

FFY 2013 40.568 0.400 1.231 10.578 52.777

FFY 2014 40.625 0.400 1.252 10.695 52.9723 Year Total: 121.378 1.200 3.696 31.731 158.005

2 Year Total (FFYs '13 and '14) 81.193 0.800 2.483 21.273 105.749

Authorizations

MAP-21 AUTHORIZATIONS

($ Billions)

See Appendix A for detail

8

So, How Did Illinois Do Under MAP-21?(Highways Only)

• IDOT’s Pre MAP-21 Goal = capture 3.6% - 3.8%

• IDOT’s Post MAP-21 Result = 3.67%3.67 %

Inc

rea

se

Ill

ino

is’ S

ha

re

Safe Bridges

IL Share3.6% - 3.8%

A Formula ForIllinois’ Future

The Next Bill

Safe Roads

Accomplished!

Achieved!

Success!

9

So, How Did Illinois Do Under MAP-21?

IL increased % Highway Share = 3.67% - highest % share since ISTEA-1997 (15 yrs. ago)

IL Rank in Hwy. funds = 6th – up from 7th

IL Rate-of-Return = nearly .99 – up from .94

New “higher” highway baseline for post MAP-21 negotiations

10

IL - Measures of Success(More on IL MAP-21 Highway Share – 3.67%)

What if IL had only attained a …………

SAFETEA-LU formula/allocation share of 3.52%?

Answer = IL would have lost a total of $112 million

SAFETEA-LU formula share of 3.32%?


TEA-21 formula share of 3.32%?


11

Rank State Share StateMAP-21

FFY '13 & '14 Share Rank State

FFY '12 & MAP-21FFY '12, '13 '14

Share

1 California 9.61% California 9.46% 1 California 9.46%2 Texas 7.71% Texas 8.16% 2 Texas 8.16%3 Florida 5.08% Florida 4.90% 3 Florida 4.90%4 New York 4.46% New York 4.34% 4 New York 4.34%5 Pennsylvania 4.30% Pennsylvania 4.24% 5 Pennsylvania 4.24%6 Ohio 3.55% Illinois 3.67% 6 Illinois 3.67%7 Illinois 3.52% Ohio 3.46% 7 Ohio 3.46%8 Georgia 3.32% Georgia 3.33% 8 Georgia 3.33%9 Michigan 2.81% Michigan 2.72% 9 Michigan 2.72%

10 North Carolina 2.70% North Carolina 2.69% 10 North Carolina 2.69%11 Virginia 2.59% Virginia 2.63% 11 Virginia 2.63%12 New Jersey 2.52% New Jersey 2.57% 12 New Jersey 2.57%13 Missouri 2.40% Indiana 2.46% 13 Indiana 2.46%14 Indiana 2.36% Missouri 2.43% 14 Missouri 2.43%15 Tennessee 2.18% Tennessee 2.18% 15 Tennessee 2.18%16 Alabama 1.96% Alabama 1.96% 16 Alabama 1.96%17 Wisconsin 1.90% Wisconsin 1.92% 17 Wisconsin 1.92%18 Washington 1.88% Arizona 1.89% 18 Arizona 1.89%19 Arizona 1.82% Louisiana 1.81% 19 Louisiana 1.81%20 Minnesota 1.81% Washington 1.74% 20 Washington 1.74%21 Louisiana 1.77% Kentucky 1.72% 21 Kentucky 1.72%22 Kentucky 1.71% Minnesota 1.67% 22 Minnesota 1.67%23 Oklahoma 1.65% Oklahoma 1.64% 23 Oklahoma 1.64%24 Massachusetts 1.61% South Carolina 1.62% 24 South Carolina 1.62%25 South Carolina 1.58% Massachusetts 1.57% 25 Massachusetts 1.57%26 Maryland 1.56% Maryland 1.55% 26 Maryland 1.55%27 Arkansas 1.34% Colorado 1.38% 27 Colorado 1.38%28 Colorado 1.33% Arkansas 1.34% 28 Arkansas 1.34%29 Connecticut 1.33% Connecticut 1.30% 29 Connecticut 1.30%30 Mississippi 1.31% Oregon 1.29% 30 Oregon 1.29%31 Alaska 1.29% Mississippi 1.25% 31 Mississippi 1.25%32 Oregon 1.28% Iowa 1.23% 32 Iowa 1.23%33 Iowa 1.18% Alaska 1.23% 33 Alaska 1.23%34 West Virginia 1.16% West Virginia 1.13% 34 West Virginia 1.13%35 West Virginia 1.02% Montana 1.02% 35 Montana 1.02%36 Montana 1.00% Kansas 0.98% 36 Kansas 0.98%37 New Mexico 0.95% New Mexico 0.95% 37 New Mexico 0.95%38 Nevada 0.81% Nevada 0.94% 38 Nevada 0.94%39 Utah 0.79% Utah 0.83% 39 Utah 0.83%40 Nebraska 0.74% Nebraska 0.75% 40 Nebraska 0.75%41 Idaho 0.73% Idaho 0.74% 41 Idaho 0.74%42 South Dakota 0.72% South Dakota 0.73% 42 South Dakota 0.73%43 North Dakota 0.67% Wyoming 0.66% 43 Wyoming 0.66%44 Wyoming 0.67% North Dakota 0.64% 44 North Dakota 0.64%45 Rhode Island 0.57% Rhode Island 0.57% 45 Rhode Island 0.57%46 Vermont 0.52% Vermont 0.52% 46 Vermont 0.52%47 Maine 0.50% Maine 0.48% 47 Maine 0.48%48 Hawaii 0.46% Delaware 0.44% 48 Delaware 0.44%49 New Hampshire 0.44% Hawaii 0.44% 49 Hawaii 0.44%50 Delaware 0.44% New Hampshire 0.43% 50 New Hampshire 0.43%51 Dist. of Col. 0.39% Dist. of Col. 0.41% 51 Dist. of Col. 0.41%

All States 100.00% All States 100.00% All States 100.00%

* FY 2013 apportionment for each State equals FY 2012 apportionment for each State; FY 2014 apportionments calculated based on FY 2012 apportionment shares.

SAFETEA-LU State Ranking by Percent Share of Total Highway

Apportionment/Allocation(FFY '05-'09)

Comparison of Illinois Rank Under SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21

SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED FY 2012, FY 2013, AND FY 2014 APPORTIONMENTS UNDER THE DRAFT CONFERENCE REPORT FOR THE MOVING AHEAD FOR

PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY ACT (MAP-21)*

MAP-21 State Ranking by Percent Share of Total Highway Apportionment

Under MAP-21Illinois improved

its rank to 6th position from 7th

position

12

MAP-21

HIGHWAY ANALYSIS

• Emphasis on National Highway System

• Restructure & consolidate highway / transit programs – makes policy changes

• Streamlines and accelerates the project delivery process

• Emphasizes a performance-based transportation system

• Improve efficiency of the system & freight movement

• Promotes project delivery innovation (TIFIA)

13

MAP-21 Core Tenets

14

MAP-21 Highlights - Highways

Core Program Consolidation: Consolidates the number of highway programs by two-thirds or about 60 programs and the core highway programsfrom 6 to 4:

Core Programs:

1.) National Highway Performance Program

2.) Surface Transportation Program

3.) Highway Safety Improvement Program

4.) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program

FFY 2013

$21.7 billion

$10.0 billion

$2.2 billion

$2.3 billion

Nationwide

See Appendix B for detail

15

MAP-21 Repealed Programs

High Priority Projects (earmarks)

Interstate Maintenance Discretionary

National Scenic Byways

Transportation, Community and System Preservation

Ferry Boats (as a discretionary program)

Innovative Bridge and National Historic Covered Bridge

Highways For Life

Equity Bonus

16

National Highway Obligation Limitation

($ Billions)FFY 2012 FFY 2013 FFY 2014 2-Year Total Annual Average

Obligation Limitation 39.144 39.699 1./ 40.256 1./ 79.955 39.9775

HTF CA Exempt from Limitation 0.739 0.739 2./ 0.739 1.478 0.739

39.883 40.438 40.995 81.433 40.7165

Contract Authority 41.024 40.438 40.995 81.433 40.7165

Limitation Ratio 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

2./ Mandatory highway spending.

MAP-21

1./ Amounts assumed by the Congressional Budget Office in their March 2012 baseline derived from the enacted 2012 number plus 1.4 percent inflation increase in each year.

Highway Obligation Limitation Vs. Contract Authority

17


19 November 2012

Base Apportionment 1./ Transportation Alternative 2./2% State Planning/Research Apport. After Set-Asides

National Highway Performance Program 794,414,007 16,513,059 15,888,280 762,012,668

Surface Transportation Program 365,405,501 7,595,489 7,308,110 350,501,902

Highway Safety Improvement Program 76,933,066 1,599,167 1,538,661 73,795,238

Railway-Highway Crossings Program (HSIP take-down) 10,365,176 N/A N/A 10,365,176

Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program 110,115,741 2,288,917 2,202,315 105,624,509

Metropolitan Planning 16,556,661 344,154 N/A 16,212,507

Total: 1,373,790,152 28,340,786 26,937,366 1,318,512,000

Transportation Alternatives: 28,340,786 2% State Planning/Research: 26,937,366

1./ FHWA Notice N4510.759 - 10/1/20122./ Set-aside of Transportation Alternatives (TA) from base apportionment. Total Illinois Apportionment: 1,373,790,152

Base Apportionment Transportation Alternative 1./2% State Planning/Research Apport. After Set-Asides

National Highway Performance Program 801,222,219 16,739,432 16,024,444 768,458,343

Surface Transportation Program 368,537,065 7,699,613 7,370,741 353,466,711

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP take-down) 77,681,222 1,622,945 1,553,624 74,504,653

Railway-Highway Crossings Program 10,365,176 N/A N/A 10,365,176

Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program 111,059,444 2,320,295 2,221,189 106,517,960

Metropolitan Planning 16,698,553 348,872 N/A 16,349,681

Total: 1,388,023,824 28,731,157 27,169,999 1,329,662,523

Transportation Alternatives: 28,731,157 2% State Planning/Research: 27,169,999

1./ Set-aside of Transportation Alternatives (TA) from base apportionment. Total Illinois Apportionment: 1,385,563,679

Illinois MAP-21 Highway Apportionments

FFY 2013 - As Apportioned by FHWASet-Asides from Base Apportionment

FFY 2014 (Estimated)Set-Asides from Base Apportionment

18


November 19, 2012

Nat'l. Hwy. Hwy. Safety Rail-way Hwy.Fiscal Year Performance Pgm. Surface Transp. Pgm. Improvement Pgm. Crossing Pgm. CMAQ Metro. Planning TotalFFY 2013 IL 794,414,007 365,405,501 76,933,066 10,365,176 110,115,741 16,556,661 1,373,790,152 National 22,203,518,597 10,212,921,425 2,219,947,097 220,000,000 2,302,131,638 318,300,917 37,476,819,674

IL Percent Share 3.58% 3.58% 3.47% 4.71% 4.78% 5.20% 3.67%

Total MAP-21 Hwy. Contract Authority FFY 2013: 40,438,000,000 Admin. Expenses 454,180,326 TIFIA 750,000,000 Federal Lands 1,190,000,000 Emergency Relief 100,000,000 Ferry Boats 67,000,000 Research Pgms. 400,000,000

2,961,180,326

Nat'l. Hwy. Hwy. Safety Rail-way Hwy.Fiscal Year Performance Pgm. Surface Transp. Pgm. Improvement Pgm. Crossing Pgm. CMAQ Metro. Planning TotalFFY 2014 IL 801,222,219 368,537,065 77,681,222 10,365,176 111,059,444 16,698,553 1,385,563,679 National 22,393,805,108 10,300,447,247 2,240,857,707 220,000,000 2,321,861,151 321,028,787 37,798,000,000

IL Percent Share 3.58% 3.58% 3.47% 4.71% 4.78% 5.20% 3.67%

Total MAP-21 Hwy. Contract Authority FFY 2014: 40,995,000,000 Admin. Expenses 440,000,000 TIFIA 1,000,000,000 Federal Lands 1,190,000,000 Emergency Relief 100,000,000 Ferry Boats 67,000,000 Research Pgms. 400,000,000

3,197,000,000

Notes:FFY 2013 - "Actual" - FHWA Notice: N 4510.759 - October 1, 2012FFY 2014 - "FHWA Estimates"

Illinois' Share of Highway Program Apportionments Under MAP-21

Aut

horiz

atio

nsA

utho

rizat

ions

19


November 19, 2012

Nat'l. Hwy. Hwy. Safety Rail-way Hwy.Fiscal Year Performance Pgm. Surface Transp. Pgm. Improvement Pgm. Crossing Pgm. CMAQ Metro. Planning TotalFFY 2013 IL Pgm. Apport. 794,414,007 365,405,501 76,933,066 10,365,176 110,115,741 16,556,661 1,373,790,152 IL Total Apport. 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152 1,373,790,152

IL Percent Share 57.83% 26.60% 5.60% 0.75% 8.02% 1.21% 100.00%

Nat'l. Hwy. Hwy. Safety Rail-way Hwy.Fiscal Year Performance Pgm. Surface Transp. Pgm. Improvement Pgm. Crossing Pgm. CMAQ Metro. Planning TotalFFY 2014 IL 801,222,219 368,537,065 77,681,222 10,365,176 111,059,444 16,698,553 1,385,563,679 National 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679 1,385,563,679

IL Percent Share 57.83% 26.60% 5.61% 0.75% 8.02% 1.21% 100.00%

Notes:FFY 2013 - "Actual" - FHWA Notice: N 4510.759 - October 1, 2012FFY 2014 - "FHWA Estimates"

Illinois' Program Share of Total Illinois Highway Apportionments Under MAP-21

20


National Highway Performance Program:

Consolidates Interstate Maintenance Program, National Highway System Program and aspects of the Bridge Program into a formula NHPP. NHPP purpose is to provide funding to support the existing NHS and for construction of new facilities on the NHS. Eligible projects include improving safety, mobility or freight on NHS, construction, rehabilitation or segments/bridges on NHS – also certain Federal-aid highways not on NHS, also bike/ped. and ITS. State must develop risk-based asset management plan.

21


Surface Transportation Program:

The STP program continues to provide broad eligibility and expands eligibility to include former stand-alone projects/programs such as: carpool projects, environmental mitigation, congestion pricing, recreational trails, construction of ferry boats, and truck parking facilities. Reduces the percentage of funds suballocated by population from 62.5% to 50% . Provides 15% set-aside for “off system bridges.” Eliminates the 10% STP set-aside for transportation enhancements.

22


Highway Safety Improvement Program:

Continues the HSIP to support projects that improve the safety of road infrastructure on all public roads, including non-state owned public roads – includes provisions to improve data collection/analysis. Eliminates set-aside for high-risk rural roads but continues eligibility for those activities. Continues $220 million per year set-aside for railway-highway crossings. A state is not eligible for “August Redistribution” of obligation limitation if it does not have an approved/updated strategic highway safety plan. The federal share for a HSIP project is 90 percent.

23


Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program:

Continues the existing program and provides funds for state and local governments to use on projects that help meet the goals of the Clean Air Act. States/MPOs with non-attainment areas for PM2.5 shall give priority consideration to projects that reduce PM2.5, including diesel retrofits; and for areas designated for fine particulate matter – 25% used to reduce fine particulate matter emissions. MPOs over 1 million in population must develop a performance plan. Funds to a state may be used to establish electric vehicle charging stations.

24


State Planning and Research:

Two percent of the sums apportioned each year for:

1.) National Highway Performance Program

2.) Surface Transportation Program

3.) Highway Safety Improvement Program, and

4.) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program will be made available for state planning and research.

Illinois SP&R Estimate

FFY 2013 = $26.9 million FFY 2014 = $27.2 million

25


Sub-allocated Programs

Transportation Alternatives:

50% of funds to be sub-allocated within the state based on population (to MPOs and localities) – amounts to areas over 200,000 are programmed by the MPOs.

50% of funds to be distributed by IDOT via a competitive process

Surface Transportation Program:

50% of funds to be sub-allocated within the state based on population – (reduced from 62.5%).

50% of funds to be distributed by IDOT to any area of the state.

Note: No CMAQ sub-allocation

26


National Highway System:

MAP-21 expands the size of the National Highway System (NHS) by adding principal arterial routes and border crossings on those routes that were not included on the National Highway System before the date of enactment of the MAP–21. It also adds other connector highways (including toll facilities) that provide motor vehicle access between arterial routes on the NHS and a major intermodal transportation facility.

Under MAP-21, the enhanced NHS will be expanded from roughly 160,000 to roughly 220,000 miles of rural and urban roads serving major population centers, international border crossings, intermodal transportation facilities, and major travel destinations.

27


National Highway System (continued):

The National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) is authorized at an average of $21.8 billion per year to support the condition and performance of the NHS, for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in an asset management plan of a State for the NHS.

Prior to enactment of MAP-21, Illinois had approximately 5,738 of NHS miles. Under MAP-21 (effective October 1, 2012) Illinois expects that approximately 2,000 miles of principal arterials will be added to Illinois’ NHS mileage for a total of 7,738 NHS miles – nearly a 35% increase. NHPP funds can be utilized for eligible activities on these new NHS miles where formerly Surface Transportation Program funds or program specific funds were only allowed, i.e. the restructuring of the NHS gives the states more discretion with NHPP funds. UnderSAFETEA-LU, 2,000 miles of Illinois’ principal arterials could not use National Highway System program funds and now they can be used.

28

Other Highway Programs

National Freight Program – No funding for a National Freight Program, however, within 1 year of enactment, US DOT will establish a National Freight Network, consisting of a primary freight network as well as any portions of the Interstate Highway system that do not fall under the primary freight network, and critical rural freight corridors. The primary freight network is limited to 27,000 total centerline miles of highways, with a variance of an additional 3,000 miles. The primary freight network will also be re-designated every 10 yrs. For freight projects within a State Freight Plan, there is a 95% federal share for projects on the Interstate System and a 90% share for other eligible projects.

29


TIFIA – Increases annual funding available for Federal credit assistance under the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program from$122 million to $750 million in FFY 2013 and $1 billion in FFY 2014. Removes all evaluation criteria for projects seeking credit assistance, and provides funds for eligible projects on a first-come, first-served basis–funded from Highway Trust Fund

Projects of National and Regional Significance - The PNRS is funded “only” for FFY 2013 at $500 million. It is funded from General Funds as opposed to the Highway Trust Fund. This program is a discretionary program and must be appropriated in the US DOT FFY 2013 appropriations bill

30


Federal Lands Access Program – This program is targeted at public highway, road, bridge, trail, or transit systems which are owned by a State or local government and provide access to Federal lands. The funds are distributed by formula. An initial FHWA estimate is that Illinois will receive approximately $1 million per year under this program in FFY 2013 and FFY 2014.

31

Significant Highway Policy Changes

Streamlining – Eases federal environmental review requirements and waives them in certain emergency situations – also provides for certain activities to be designated as “categorical exclusions”, used to prevent unnecessary reviews of individual actions. Project delivery initiative designed to advance best practices to reduce delivery time and project costs, from planning through construction, for all modes. Several new provisions are subject to rulemaking by US DOT.

Tolling – Expands ability of states to use federal funds to construct new capacity, reconstruct, restore or rehabilitate and then toll highways on the Interstate System, provided that the number of toll-free, non-HOV lanes does not decrease as a result of the construction. Expands ability of states to use federal funds to construct and toll new capacity of highways not on Interstate System, provided that the number of toll-free lanes does not decrease as a result of the construction.

32


Truck Size & Weight – Within two years after enactment US DOT must complete a size and weight study to assess the impacts of trucks operating in excess of federal weight limits. The study will gather information on factors associated with accident frequency and risk, infrastructure impacts, cost and benefits analysis, and a study of six-axle and other alternative configuration of tractor-trailers and to also consider the effects of trucks operating in excess of federal weight limits when assessing accident frequency impacts to highway and bridge infrastructure.

Public-Private Partnerships – US DOT will compile best practices on how states, public transportation agencies, and other public officials can work with the private sector in the development, financing, construction and operation of transportation facilities. Within 18 months of MAP-21’s enactment, US DOT will develop standard public-private partnership transaction model contracts to serve as templates for such partnerships.

33


Performance Management - Directs US DOT to undertake a rulemaking for performance measures and standards to reduce traffic fatalities/injuries on public roads. Establishes national goals in seven areas: Safety, Infrastructure Condition, Congestion Reduction, System Reliability, Freight Movement and Economic Vitality, Environmental Sustainability, and Reduced Project Delivery Delays. States will set performance targets based on a rulemaking by US DOT that reflect measures in the National Highway Performance Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program, and National Freight Movement. Not later than four years after the enactment of MAP-21, states shall submit a report reflecting these performance measures to the Secretary.

34

MAP-21

SAFETY ANALYSIS

35

MAP-21 Highlights – Highway Safety

NHTSA – MAP-21 restructured some of the existing programs and consolidated highway safety grant programs under a single statutory umbrella. MAP-21 also eliminated several programs but the bill continues to allow many of these activities to be fund through other NHTSA grants. E.G. the Safety Belt Performance Grants program is eliminated as is the Child Safety and Booster Seat grant program. MAP-21 provides funding increases for most programs. A new Distracted Driving Incentive Grant Program is added at roughly $22 million per year. NHTSA authorizations are noted on the following table.

36

NHTSA Authorizations

AppropriationFFY 2012 FFY 2013 FFY 2014

Highway Safety Research and Development 105,500,000 110,500,000 113,500,000

National Driver Register 4,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000

Highway safety programs 235,000,000 235,000,000 235,000,000

Safety belt performance grants 48,500,000 --------------------- ---------------------

Occupant protection incentive grants 25,000,000 (42,400,000) (43,520,000)

State traffic safety IT improvement 34,500,000 (38,425,000) (39,440,000)

Impaired driving countermeasures 139,000,000 (139,125,000) (142,800,000)

Distracted driving incentive grants ------------------- (22,525,000) (23,120,000)

State graduated driver licensing laws ------------------- (13,250,000) (13,600,000)

Research into anti-DUI technology ------------------- (5,300,000) (5,440,000)

Motorcylist safety incentive grants 7,000,000 (3,975,000) (4,080,000)

National Priority Safety Programs Subtotal: 265,000,000 272,000,000

Grant administration 25,328,000 25,500,000 25,500,000

High visibility enforcement 29,000,000 29,000,000 29,000,000

Child safety and booster seat grants 7,000,000 --------------------- ---------------------

Total NHTSA Authorizations: 659,828,000 670,000,000 680,000,000

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) MAP-21 Authorizations

MAP-21 Authorization

National Priority Safety Programs

37

MAP-21 Highlights – Highway Safety

FMCSA – The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is primarily a regulatory agency and not a grant making agency. However, the FMCSA does provide funding for motor carrier safety grants to states for the implementation and enforcement of federal and state laws related to commercial truck safety. MAP-21 generally retains the current structure and funding levels for motor carrier safety grant programs.

Following is a FMCSA authorization table.

38

FMCSA Authorizations

AppropriationsFY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Administrative Expenses 247,724,000 251,000,000 259,000,000

MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY GRANTS

Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program 212,000,000 215,000,000 218,000,000

(Set-aside authorized for New Entrant Audit Program Grant) (29,000,000) (32,000,000) (32,000,000)

Commercial Driver's License Program Improvements Program 30,000,000 30,000,000 30,000,000

Border Enforcement Grants 32,000,000 32,000,000 32,000,000

Performance & Registration Information System Management Grants (PRISM) 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000

Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks Deployment Program 25,000,000 25,000,000 25,000,000

Safety Data Improvement Program 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000

Total, Motor Carrier Safety Grants 307,000,000 310,000,000 313,000,000

Total, FMCSA (Highway Trust Fund) 554,724,000 561,000,000 572,000,000

MAP-21 Authorizations

MAP-21 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FFY 2012 Authorizations

The PRISM program links state motor vehicle registration systems with carrier safety data in order to identify unsafe commercial motor carriers.

39

MAP-21

TRANSIT ANALYSIS

40

IL - Measures of Success

IL Rank in transit funds = 3rd – up from 4th/5th

Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) estimates a$20 million increase (annually) in formula funds

Making “core capacity” projects eligible under “New Starts” will allow the $4 billion CTA Red-Purple Modernization program to be eligible

Metra’s new UP West project will be eligible as a core capacity project

41

IL - Measures of Success

The Regional Transportation Authority pools the Section 5307 (Formula) and Section 5309 (Rail Modernization) funding and distributes the funding based on a pre-established formula:

o Chicago Transit Authority (bus/rail) – 58%

o Metra (commuter rail) – 34%

o Pace (suburban bus/regional paratransit) – 8%

Illinois is expecting increased funding under MAP-21, hence more funding to be distributed amongst the 3 transit operators that serve northeastern Illinois.

42

MAP-21 Transit Authorizations

Highway Trust Fund / General Fund Breakdown($ Billions)

FFY 2013 FFY 2014

HTF / Transit Account 8.5 8.6

General Funds 2.1 2.1

10.6 10.7

FFY 2012 funding is extended based on current law.(See Full Transit Authorization Table–next slide)

Maintains basic program structureHTF / TA = Formula ProgramsGeneral Funds = New Starts and other programs

43

Program

Division G: SurfaceTransportation

Extension Act of2012, Part II, Title III

- Public Transportation Programs

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2104Total All Programs 10,458,278,000 10,578,000,000 10,695,000,000

Formula Programs Total 8,360,565,000 8,478,000,000 8,595,000,000

§ 20005(b) Pilot Program for Transit OrientedDevelopment Planning

--- 10,000,000 10,000,000

§ 5305 Planning 113,500,000 126,900,000 128,800,000

§ 5307 Urbanized Area Subtotal 4,160,365,000 4,397,950,000 4,458,650,000

§ 5308 Clean Fuels Formula 51,500,000 --- ---

§ 5309(m)(2)(B) Fixed-Guideway Modernization 1,666,500,000 --- ---

§ 5309(m)(2)(C) Bus and Bus Facilities 984,000,000 --- ---

§ 5310 Elderly and Disabled 133,500,000 254,800,000 258,300,000

§ 5311 Rural Area Subtotal 465,000,000 599,500,000 607,800,000

Basic Rural Formula 440,700,000 537,510,000 545,644,000

§ 5311(b)(3) RTAP 9,300,000 11,990,000 12,156,000

§ 5311(c)(1) Public Transportation on an IndianReservations

15,000,000 30,000,000 30,000,000

§ 5311(c)(2) Appalachian Development PublicTransportation Assistance

--- 20,000,000 20,000,000

§ 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute 164,500,000 --- ---

§ 5317 New Freedom 92,500,000 --- ---

§ 5318 Bus Testing Facility --- 3,000,000 3,000,000

§ 5320 Alternative Transportation in Parks 26,900,000

§ 5322(d) National Transit Institute --- 5,000,000 5,000,000

§ 5335 National Transit Database 3,500,000 3,850,000 3,850,000

§ 5337 State of Good Repair --- 2,136,300,000 2,165,900,000

§ 5339 Alternatives Analysis 25,000,000 --- ---

§ 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Formula --- 422,000,000 427,800,000

§ 5340 Growing States and High Density States 465,000,000 518,700,000 525,900,000

§ 3038 Over-the Road Bus Subtotal 8,800,000 --- ---

General Funds Programs Total 2,097,713,000 2,100,000,000 2,100,000,000

§ 5309(m)(2)(C) New Starts Total 1,955,000,000 1,907,000,000 1,907,000,000

§ 5309(m)(2)(A)(i) Projects Less Than $75,000,000 200,000,000 --- ---

§ 5309(m)(2)(A)(ii) Grants of $75,000,000 or More 1,755,000,000 --- ---

§ 5312 Research, Development Demonstration andDeployment

--- 70,000,000 70,000,000

§ 5313(a) TCRP 6,300,000 7,000,000 7,000,000

§ 5315 National Transit Institute 2,709,000 --- ---

§ 5314 Technical Assistance and StandardsDevelopment

--- 7,000,000 7,000,000

§ 5314 National Research 28,061,000 --- ---

§ 5314(a)(2) Project Action 1,890,000 --- ---

§ 5314(c) National Technical Assistance Center 630,000 --- ---

§ 5324 Emergency Relied Program --- ssaan ssaan

§ 5334 FTA Administration 98,713,000 104,000,000 104,000,000

§ 5322 (a),(b),(c),(e) Human Resources and Training --- 5,000,000 5,000,000

§ 5506 University Centers 4,410,000 --- ---

ssaan = such sums as are necessary

Transit Funding Levels (Dollars)

Division B:Federal Public Transportation

Act of 2012

Programs Funded from the Highway Trust Fund

Programs Funded from General Funds

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act

Extracted from the American Public Transportation (APTA) Legislative Alert, June 29, 2012

44

MAP-21 Transit Apportionments (Part 1)

September 7, 2012

S E C T I O N 5305Sec. 5305 Sec. 5310 (> 200 K) Sec. 5310 (> 50 K < 200 K) Sec. 5310 (< 50 K) Sec. 5311 Sec. 5311 (Formula) (Statewide)

Statewide and Enhanced Mobility of Seniors Enhanced Mobility of Seniors Enhanced Mobility of Seniors Non Urbanized Area Non Urbanized Area Bus and Bus andMetro Planning Individuals w/Disabilities Individuals w/Disabilities Individuals w/Disabilities Growing States Jobs Access Reverse Commute Bus Facilities Bus Facilities

Alton, IL--MO 113,724

Beloit, WI--IL 25,986

Bloomington-Normal, IL 241,959

Cape Girardeau, MO--IL 418

Carbondale, IL 89,181

Champaign, IL 288,233

Chicago, IL--IN 6,020,332 13,625,924

Danville, IL-IN 73,398

Davenport, IA--IL 123,784 217,140

Decatur, IL 130,488

DeKalb, IL 124,072

Dubuque, IA--IL 4,834

Kankakee, IL 133,749

Kenosha, WI--IL 682

Peoria, IL 242,553 349,569

Rockford, IL 270,108 311,354

Round Lake Beach--McHenry--Grayslake, IL--WI

137,899 160,119

Springfield, IL 234,466

St. Louis, MO--IL 492,397

Illinois Subtotal: 6,460,655 6,794,677 1,365,161 784,723 14,966,565 807,131 16,617,693 1,250,000 Metro (5,501,351)

Statewide (959,304)

Apportioned National Total: 126,265,500 152,115,600 50,705,200 50,705,200 572,482,763 36,602,561 356,500,000 65,500,000

Illinois Percent Share: 5.12% 4.47% 2.69% 1.55% 2.61% 2.21% 4.66% 1.91%

1./ Note: Apportioned to the Governor, who then authorizes a designated recipient from each urbanized area to apply directly to FTA.2./ Does not include Fixed Guideway Capital Investment "Discretionary" Grants which were authorized at $1.907 billion.3./ Illinois is not eligible for any of the $20 million (5311) Appalachian Program funding.4./ STIC is included within Sec. 5307 - only broken out for illustrative purposes.

Percentages based on population were applied to estimate apportionments in an urbanized area bordering another state.

S E C T I O N 5 3 1 0 S E C T I O N 5311 and Growing States S E C T I O N 5339

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

A D

M I N

I S T

E R

E D

B Y

T H

E S

T A

T E

"Estimated" MAP-21 FFY 2013 Transit Apportionments

45

MAP-21 Transit Apportionments (Part 2)

Illinois Subtotal:

Apportioned National Total:

Illinois Percent Share:

Sec. 5307 (> 1 Million) Sec. 5307 (200 K < 1 Million) Sec. 5307 (50 K < 200 K) High Intensity High Intensity

Urbanized Area Urbanized Area Urbanized Area Small Transit Fixed Guideway Motorbus Apportionments Apportionments Apportionments Intensive Cities (STIC) State of Good Repair State of Good Repair TOTALS

1,082,902 1,196,626 Alton, IL--MO

65,709 91,695 Beloit, WI--IL

2,617,283 437,494 3,296,736 Bloomington-Normal, IL

18 436 Cape Girardeau, MO--IL

844,965 934,146 Carbondale, IL

3,972,481 1,312,482 5,573,196 Champaign, IL

218,388,243 193,077,715 155,505 431,267,719 Chicago, IL--IN

712,325 785,723 Danville, IL-IN

1,936,313 2,277,237 Davenport, IA--IL

1,461,389 218,747 1,810,624 Decatur, IL

1,136,466 1,260,538 DeKalb, IL

1,442 6,276 Dubuque, IA--IL

1,670,888 437,494 2,242,131 Kankakee, IL

0.2 682 Kenosha, WI--IL

3,171,861 3,763,983 Peoria, IL

2,946,922 3,528,384 Rockford, IL

3,899,018 4,894,550 9,091,586 Round Lake Beach--McHenry--Grayslake, IL--WI

2,405,946 218,747 2,859,159 Springfield, IL

5,618,979 6,111,376 St. Louis, MO--IL

224,007,223 11,954,114 15,971,814 2,624,964 197,972,265 155,505 501,732,489 See footnote 1./

See footnote 4./

3,350,345,423 886,494,197 521,253,189 62,999,225 2,059,849,834 60,427,916 8,289,247,383

6.69% 1.35% 3.06% 4.17% 9.61% 0.26% 6.05%

S E C T I O N 5337S E C T I O N 5307 and High Density/Growing StatesURBANIZED AREA APPORTIONMENTS

"Estimated" MAP-21 FFY 2013 Transit Apportionments

46

MAP-21 - Transit Formula Programs

Urbanized Area Grants:

Maintains basic structure - is the largest transit program.

Eligible for Operating Expenses:

Urbanized areas with populations < 200,000 can use grants for operating cost of equipment / facilities

Urbanized areas with populations > 200,000 and that operate 75 or fewer buses can use 75% of apportionment for operating cost of equipment / facilities

Urbanized areas with populations > 200,000 and that operate 76-100 buses can use 50% of apportionment for operating cost of equipment / facilities

JARC is eligible activity-former set-aside eliminated

47

MAP-21 Transit Formula Programs

Rural Formula – Maintains existing structure, grants for planning, capital/operating cost & JARC Formula = 83.15% based on Land Area/Pop.

16.85% based on Land Area/Vehicle Revenue Miles/Low Income Individuals

Elderly and Disabled – New Freedom is combined with E&D pgm. – remains under Sec. 5310. Formula = 60% to areas > 200,000

20% to areas < 200,000 20% to Rural Areas

48


State of Good Repair – Formula program with goal to move all systems to a SGR - replaces current Fixed Guideway Modernization program. SGR funding increased due to downsized earmarked Bus/Bus Facilities Program. Fixed Guideway definition = transportation facility occupying separate row for public transportation, uses rail, uses fixed catenary system, passenger ferry system or bus rapid transit system. Eligible project = replace/rehabilitate rolling stock, track, line equip. and structures, signals, passenger stations/terminals, maintenance facilities.

Formula = 97.15% - (Remaining 2.85% to High Intensity Motor bus SGR)

Split 50% Area Share

50% Vehicle Revenue Miles – to be split:

60% Fixed Guideway Vehicle Miles

40% Fixed Guideway Directional Miles

49


Bus & Bus Facilities Program – Becomes a formula program (under SAFETEA-LU approx. ½ was earmarked with other ½ earmarked in the annual US DOT Approp. bills. Bus funds cut by approx. $470 million from SAFETEALU, those funds now added to SGR pgm. Of the $518.7 million made available in FFY 2013, $65.5 million will be allocated to the states/territories, with IL receiving $1.25 million. The remaining $453.2 million is distributed by formula (pop./bus factors).

Formula = 9.32% to areas < 200,000 90.68% to areas > 200,000

50


High Density States/Growing States Program – Maintains this program and increases funding by no less than 11% in FFY 2013 to $518 million from $465 million. IL only captures about 2% of this program.

Other Formula Programs:o Pilot Program for Transit Oriented Development Planningo Planningo Bus Testing Facilityo National Transit Instituteo National Transit Database

51

MAP-21 Transit General Funds Programs

Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants: Discretionary program funded at $1.907 billion for each of FFYs 2013 and 2014. Streamlines the New Starts project approval process – projects under $100 million can utilize expedited review process upon conditions. Core Capacity projects become eligible = substantial corridor-based capital investment that increases capacity of a corridor by not less than 10%. Small Start projects (federal $s less than $75 million/total projects cost less than $250 million) as well as New Fixed Guideway and interrelated projects are eligible. Defines “corridor-based” and “fixed guideway” bus rapid transit projects and limits them to New Starts funding. Includes a pilot program for expedited project delivery.

52

MAP-21 Other Transit Programs

Transit Asset Management – US DOT will establish a national Transit Asset Management System to monitor and manage public transportation assets and to improve safety and increase reliability and performance. All recipients and sub-recipients must develop plans. 1-year after enactment US DOT will issue a final rule to establish performance measures – 3 months later recipients to develop performance targets.

Public Transportation Safety – US DOT will create and implement a national public transportation safety plan to improve the safety of all public transportation systems that receive federal funding. 1-year after the final rule each state must certify that they have a safety plan. Federal formula funds are made available to develop and carry-out state safety oversight programs.

53

MAP-21 Other Transit Programs

Public Transportation Emergency Relief – Authorizes an Emergency Relief Program (similar to Hwy. E.R. pgm.) funded from General Funds to make grants for capital/operating costs in the event of a natural disaster.

Pilot Program for Transit-Oriented Development –$10 million is made available for each of FFYs 2013 and 2014 for a new fixed guideway capital project or a core capacity improvement project to assist in planning.

Mass Transit and Parking Benefits – MAP-21 does not retain the parity between the employer-provided vanpool and transit pass benefit to the same level as the exclusion for employer-provided parking that expired 12/31/11. Vanpooling and transit benefits fall back to $125 per month as opposed to the former $240 per month.

54

MAP-21

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

55

MAP-21 Finance

To cover the estimated shortfalls in the HTF, a total of $21.2 billion is transferred to the HTF through 2014

Several revenue-raising provisions offset the cost of General Fund Transfers to the HTF to “replenish” the General Fund

MAP-21 extends the motor fuel excise taxes dedicated to the HTF at their present rates through 9/30/16 with the exception of the heavy vehicle tax which is extended through 9/30/17

The Congressional Budget Office projects that the HTF balance will be exhausted at the end of FFY 2015

56

MAP-21 Finance

Highway Motor Fuel Taxes Gasoline 18.3 cpg (does not include .1 cpg for LUST Fund) Receipts - FFY 2010Diesel Fuel and Kerosene 24.3 cpg $33.9 billionAlternative Fuels 18.3 or 24.3 cpg generally

Non-fuel HTF Excise Taxes Tires An excise tax imposed on highway tires with a rated load capacity exceeding 3,500 pounds, generally at a rate of 0.945 cents per 10 pounds excess

$318 million

Truck and Trailer Sales A 12-percent excise tax imposed on the first retail sale of heavy highway vehicles, tractors, and trailers (generally, trucks having a gross vehicle weight in excess of 33,000 pounds and trailers having such a weight in excess of 26,000 pounds)

$1.5 billion

Heavy Vehicle Use An annual use tax imposed on highway vehicles having a taxable gross weight of 55,000 pounds or more. (The maximum rate for this tax is $550 per year, imposed on vehicles having a taxable gross weight over 75,000 pounds.)

$900 million

Interest Income Investments - as of March / 2010 HTF earns interest $17.5 million

Total HTF Excise Tax Receipts: $36.7 billionCBO FFY 2013 HTF HA/MTA Outlays total: $50.8 billion

HTF FFY 2013 Shortfall: -$14.1 billion

MAP-21 Excise Taxes Imposed to Finance the Highway Trust Fund

Note: For simplicity this chart disregards transfers to other funds, and other income - these transactions do not significantly change the bottom-line total receipts number. In addition, prior General Fund transfers are not shown.

57

MAP-21 Finance

MAP-21 REVENUE TITLE July 9. 2012

(Transfers to the Highway Trust Fund)

($ Billions)

Highway Trust Fund / Highway Account Highway Trust Fund / Transit Account Total

FFY 2012 1./ 2.4 2.4

FFY 2013 2./ 6.2 6.2

FFY 2014 3./ 10.4 2.2 12.6

19.0 2.2 21.2

HIGHLIGHTS

* Motor fuel taxes and the LUST tax is extended at their current rates through 9/30/16.

* Expenditure authority for the HTF is extended through 9/30/14.

1./ Upon enactment (7/6/12), $2.4 billion from the LUST TF is transferred to the HTF/HA.

2./ General Funds transferred to the HTF/HA.

3./ General Funds transferred to the HTF/HA and HTF/TA.

58

Highway Trust Fund ProjectionsCBO August FY 2012 Baseline 2011-2022(In Billions of dollars)

August 22, 20122011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Highway Account

ResourcesContract Authority (FHWA) 39.9 40.2 40.4 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41Contract Authority -- flexed to transit

-1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0

Contract Authority (Safety) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

Obligation Limitation (FHWA) 41.1 39.1 39.8 40.4 41 41.8 42.7 43.5 44.5 45.4 46.3 47.2Obligation Limitation (flexed to transit)

-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1

Obligation Limitation (Safety) 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5

Cash FlowBeginning of Year Balance 20.7 14.3 8.7 a a a a a a a a aEst. Flexing -- Transfer of Cash -1.1 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0

Revenues, Interest & Intergovernmentaltransfers b 32.0 35.9 32.7 32.8 33.8 34.9 35.7 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.5 36.8General Fund Transfer 0.0 0.0 6.2 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0Outlays 37.3 40.5 42 42.7 43.3 43.4 43.8 44.4 45.1 45.5 46 46.4End of Year Balance 14.3 8.7 4.7 4.1 a a a a a a a a

Transit AccountResourcesContract Authority (FTA) 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6Contract Authority -- flexed from Highways

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Obligation Limitation (FTA includes flexing)

9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.8 9.9 10.1 10.3 10.5 10.7 10.9 11.1

Beginning of Year Balance 8.5 7.3 4.7 1.8 a a a a a a a aEst. Flexing -- Transfer of Cash 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Revenues & Interest b 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 5 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1General Fund Transfer 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Outlays 7.2 8.5 8.8 9.4 9.8 10.4 10.6 10.6 10.2 10.3 10.5 10.7End of Year Balance 7.3 4.7 1.8 0.5 a a a a a a a a

Memorandum

Cumulative Shortfall aHighway Account Shortfall n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. -6.4 -16 -25.1 -34.3 -44.2 -54.3 -64.7 -75.4Transit Account Shortfall n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. -3.3 -7.7 -12.3 -16.8 -20.9 -25.1 -29.5 -34.2

a. CBO projects that the highway account of the Highway Trust Fund will be exhasted in Fiscal Year 2015 and the transit account in fiscal year 2015. Under current law, the Highway Trust Fund cannot incur negative balances. However, following the rules in the Deficit Control Act of 1985, CBO's baseline for highway spending assumes that obligations presented to the Highway Trust Fund will be paid in full. The memorandum to this table illustrates the cumulative shortfall of fund balances, assuming spending levels consistent with obligation limitations contained in the August 2012 baseline for highway spending.

b. The non-permanent portions of the taxes that are deposited in the Highway Trust Fund scheduled are scheduled to expire at the end of September 30, 2014. Those include taxes on certain heavy vehicles and tires and all but 4.3 cents of federal taxes levied on fuels. However, under the baseline construction rules, CBO’s baseline projections assume that all of the expiring taxes credited to the fund continue.

Estimates of trust fund balances or shortfalls reflect CBO's best estimate of likely outcomes under current law. Actual balances could be higher or lower, depending on the accuracy of revenue and spending estimates.

Unable to meet obligations

59

MAP-21

Post MAP-21 & Next Steps

60

Post MAP-21

It is Not too early to start posturing for post MAP-21 bill - (expires 9/30/14)

Issues for Possible Discussion Increase federal funding for - Highways, Transit and Rail – to meet needs

Pass a longer term (multi-year bill)

Identify revenue sources (user fees) to keep HTF solvent to meet long-term needs. (Federal MFT last raised 1993)

What is the impact of the new CAFE standards? Impact of Hybrid/Electric cars?

Should we index the MFT?

Is a Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) fee an option?

IL needs to maintain current shares of MAP-21 – 3.67%.

May need to strengthen donor equity provisions – IL still Donor State.

Protect user fee principle–no diversions to non-transportation programs.

Do well-vetted earmarks have a place in a surface transportation bill?

Transportation NeedsNational Surface Transportation Policy & Revenue Study Commission

Funding Gap $155 billion

$ Billions




$224 billion needed

$69 b.

$13 b.$4 b. $1 b.

$27 billionneeded

$6 billionneeded

$7 billionneeded

(Range through 2020-All Government Levels) National Needs

Current NationalLevel

“Total Funding Gap$177 billion”

61

62

MAP-21 ImplementationNext Steps

Safety provisions

Performance measures

Apportionments

Innovative financing

Metropolitan and statewide planning

Transportation alternatives

IDOT conducted an initial high-level review of the bill and is currently completing an in-depth Department-wide analysis of major sections including:

63

MAP-21 ImplementationNext Steps

Identifying policy and programmatic changes Identifying key deadlines/mandates/rule-making Identifying needs for additional personnel and resources Identifying processes/internal systems that need modification

Within these MAP-21 sections IDOT’s analysis focuses on:

IDOT views the implementation of MAP-21 as a dynamic and collaborative process and intends to follow appropriate federal guidance while simultaneously working with the interests of stakeholder groups and other experienced transportation professionals.

64

Appendix ANational Highway Authorizations (Part 1)

65

Appendix ANational Highway Authorizations (Part 2)

Interstate Maintenance$6.9 billion

National Highway System$8.4 billion

Highway Bridge$5.6 billion

Surface Transportation Program

$8.8 billion

Transportation Enhancementsset-aside

[$869 million)

Recreational Trails$79 million

Safe Routes to Schools$168 million

Metropolitan Planning$284 million

CMAQ$2.3 billion

Highway Safety Improvement$1.5 billion

Rail-Highway Crossings$205 million

Equity Bonus$2.7 billion

National Highway Performance$21.7 billion

FY 2012

Surface Transportation Program

$10 billion

Transportation Alternatives$808 million

Metropolitan Planning$312 million

CMAQ$2.3 billion

Highway Safety Improvement $2.2 billion

Rail-Highway Crossings$220 million

FY 2013

66

Consolidate Highway Program Structure

= Core Program

Appendix B

67

Section WhoAffected Mode By When What

2002 SecDOT FHWA June 1, 2012 Submit first biannual report on TIFIA project financial performance.

32801 SecDOT FMCSA November 15, 2012 Commence a new comprehensive truck size and weight study.(Submit to Congress 2 years after commencement.)

1405 SecDOT FHWA November 30, 2012 Modify 23 CFR 630.1108(a) to increase protective measures for highway workers.

20021 SecDOT FTA December 30, 2012 Establish interim provisions for the certification and training of mass transit safety inspectors.

32802 SecDOT FMCSA December 30, 2012 Begin to compile all state laws on truck size and weight limits.

2002 SecDOT FHWA December 31, 2012 Submit to Congress the first annual report of all TIFIA applications and letters of interest received.

20008 SecDOT FTA March 30, 2013 Issue policy guidance on the new starts review and evaluation criteria.

32605 SecDOT FMCSA April 1, 2013 Submit a report to Congress on the CVISN program and on its grants management office.

20008 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Issue revised new start evaluation and rating process rule under 49 U.S.C. 5309(g).

20009 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Submit a report to Congress on possible performance measures for elderly/disabled grants.

20013 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Issue rules to carrry out new transit PPP procedures under 49 U.S.C. 5315.

20019 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Issue a final rule establishing performance measures under mass transit state of good repair standards.

20019 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Issue a final rule implementing the transit asset management system.

20021 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2013 Determine whether or not state transit oversight programs are adequate.

31102 States NHTSA October 1, 2013 States must have a data-

‐driven enforcement program in their 402 highway safety programs.

20005 MPOs in TMAs FTA October 2, 2014 Change their composition to comply with the revised 49 U.S.C. 5303(d).

32710 SecDOT FMCSA October 1, 2015 Complete a rulemaking requiring states to establish annual motorcoach safety inspection programs.

20013 SecDOT FTA October 1, 2016 Submit a report to Congress on transit PPPs.

32302 States FMCSA October 1, 2017 Allow electronic copies of medical certificates for CDL holders to be incorporated into state databases.

Selected MAP-21 Deadlines For Actions - Organized by Date (DOT Sections of Law Only)

Source: For a complete list of MAP-21 deadlines see Transportation Weekly, 7/10/2012 (Unofficial List)

Appendix C

68

For More Information

www.dot.il.gov/MAP21/map_21.html

Chuck Ingersoll, Director of Office of Planning & Programming

Jeff Bell, Bureau Chief of Bureau of Policy and Federal Affairs Illinois Department of Transportation

Office of Planning and Programming

2300 South Dirksen Parkway

Springfield, Illinois 62764

[email protected]

Phone: 217/782-6289

[email protected]

Phone: 217/785-4050

Questions ? – and Contact Information

69

Illinois Department of Transportation

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

map-21 (moving ahead for progress in the 21 st century act) november 19, 2012 map-21 overview:...

Documents

il map

new map

highway transit programs

highway analysis slide

transportation programs

formula programs

highway share

number of highway programs