manuscript version: author’s accepted...
TRANSCRIPT
warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications
Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/108042 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected].
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017) Preprint 4 September 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
A survey for variable young stars with small telescopes: First resultsfrom HOYS-CAPS
D. Froebrich1?, J. Campbell-White1, A. Scholz2, J. Eislöffel3, T. Zegmott1†,S.J. Billington1†, J. Donohoe1†, S.V. Makin1†, R. Hibbert1†, R.J. Newport4†,R. Pickard5‡, N. Quinn5‡, T. Rodda5‡, G. Piehler6‡, M. Shelley7‡, S. Parkinson5‡,K. Wiersema8,9‡, I. Walton5,10‡1 Centre for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, School of Physical Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NH, UK2 SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK3 Thüringer Landessternwarte, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany4 Functional Materials Group, School of Physical Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NH, UK5 The British Astronomical Association, Variable Star Section, Burlington House Piccadilly, London W1J 0DU, UK6 Selztal Observatory, D-55278 Friesenheim, Bechtolsheimer Weg 26, Germany7 Ashford Astronomical Society, Woodchurch Memorial Hall, Woodchurch, TN26 3QB, UK8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK9 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK10 Cranbrook and District Science and Astronomy Society, Cranbrook School, Waterloo Road, Cranbrook, TN17 3JD, UK
Received sooner; accepted later
ABSTRACT
Variability in Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) is one of their primary characteristics. Long-term, multi-filter, high-cadence monitoring of large YSO samples is the key to understand thepartly unusual light-curves that many of these objects show. Here we introduce and presentthe first results of the HOYS-CAPS citizen science project which aims to perform such mon-itoring for nearby (d< 1 kpc) and young (age< 10 Myr) clusters and star forming regions,visible from the northern hemisphere, with small telescopes. We have identified and charac-terised 466 variable (413 confirmed young) stars in 8 young, nearby clusters. All sources varyby at least 0.2 mag in V, have been observed at least 15 times in V, R and I in the same nightover a period of about 2 yrs and have a Stetson index of larger than 1. This is one of the largestsamples of variable YSOs observed over such a time-span and cadence in multiple filters.About two thirds of our sample are classical T-Tauri stars, while the rest are objects with de-pleted or transition disks. Objects characterised as bursters show by far the highest variability.Dippers and objects whose variability is dominated by occultations from normal interstellardust or dust with larger grains (or opaque material) have smaller amplitudes. We have estab-lished a hierarchical clustering algorithm based on the light-curve properties which allows theidentification of the YSOs with the most unusual behaviour, and to group sources with similarproperties. We discuss in detail the light-curves of the unusual objects V2492 Cyg, V350 Cepand 2MASS J21383981+5708470.
Key words: stars: formation, pre-main-sequence; stars: variables: general, T-Tauri, HerbigAe/Be;
? E-mail: [email protected]† Observer Beacon Observatory‡ HOYS-CAPS Observer
1 INTRODUCTION
Time-domain observations of star forming regions are a reliablesource of information about the formation and early evolution ofstars. Historically, young stars were first discovered based on theirirregular and large-amplitude optical variability (Joy 1945). Start-ing in the late 1980s, the prevalent rotational flux modulation ob-
c© 2017 The Authors
2 Froebrich et al.
served in young stars has been used to measure thousands of ro-tation periods ranging from hours to weeks, a great foundationfor studies of angular momentum evolution during the protostellarstages and beyond (see Protostars and Planets reviews by Herbstet al. (2007), Bouvier et al. (2014)). In addition to rotation, opticalfluxes of young stars are affected by variable excess emission fromaccretion shocks, variable emission from the inner disk, and vari-able extinction along the line of sight (Carpenter et al. 2001), andcan therefore give insights into the structure and evolution of theenvironment of young stellar objects (YSOs).
While the interplay of these variability causes can lead tovery complicated light-curves and render the interpretation diffi-cult, several prototypical phenomena have been successfully at-tributed to a physical cause. AA Tau is now the prototype for a cat-egory of ’dippers’, a contingent of young stars temporarily eclipsedby portions of the inner disks which are warped by the star’s mag-netic field (Bouvier et al. 2014; McGinnis et al. 2015). FU Ori andEX Lupi are prototypes for stars which experience sharp increasesin their mass accretion rates (Audard et al. 2014), a phenomenonthat is now known to occur on a wide range of timescales (Stauf-fer et al. 2016), including objects with continuous accretion ratechanges and consequently stochastic light-curves (Stauffer et al.2014, 2016). While the detailed physics behind the variety of ac-cretion bursts is still under debate, the episodic and unstable natureof accretion is now established as a primary characteristic of theearly stellar evolution. Many variable young stars still defy classifi-cation and are complicated to understand (e.g., the recent dimmingsof RW Aur, see Bozhinova et al. (2016)).
The ’gold standard’ for optical studies of YSO variability arespace-based observing campaigns with COROT and Kepler/K2.The combined COROT/Spitzer monitoring of NGC2264 is un-precedented in cadence, multi-wavelength coverage, and photomet-ric precision. Complemented by ground-based observations, it hasled to a new comprehensive overview about the phenomenology ofyoung variable stars and the underlying causes (Cody et al. 2014).Kepler/K2 has observed large numbers of young stars continuouslyover campaigns of 70 d; its archive is a treasure trove for detailedstudies of rotation periods, dippers, bursters, and related phenom-ena (Ansdell et al. 2016).
So far, these studies have been mostly limited to individualregions, to baselines of weeks to months, or to one optical band.While the astrometry mission Gaia will add time-domain informa-tion over 5 yr for thousands of young stars, it will only providesparse cadence. The same is true for the LSST coverage. Thereis a definite need for long-term monitoring, quasi-simultaneous inmultiple bands, similar to the pioneering studies by Grankin et al.(2007), but extending to a large and unbiased sample of young stars,to capture the full range of YSO variability and to put the knownphenomena in context. This can be done from the ground and withmodestly sized telescopes.
This is the goal of the HOYS-CAPS1 project, presented forthe first time in this paper. Primarily we publish a large catalogof variable young stars in regions across the northern hemisphere,including many clusters previously unstudied on long timescales.For all variable stars, we derive a range of metrics that are usedto classify the stars and to provide clues about the origin of thevariability. So far, the survey covers baselines up to 2 years. Thisproject will continue to extend the time window and will provide afoundation for detailed studies of specific phenomena.
1 http://astro.kent.ac.uk/∼df/hoyscaps/index.html
This paper is organised as follows. In Sect. 2 we introduce theHOYS-CAPS project and present details of the utilised observato-ries and data calibration. Section 3 presents the selection of youngclusters and YSOs and discusses the data analysis procedures ap-plied to their light-curves. Finally, in Sect. 4 we discuss the resultsof our analysis.
2 DATA
2.1 The HOYS-CAPS Project
HOYS-CAPS stands for Hunting Outbursting Young Stars with theCentre of Astrophysics and Planetary Science. This citizen scienceproject has been run by the University of Kent since October 2014.It currently involves amateur astronomers from the UK, as well asfrom Europe. It is also supported by additional professional obser-vatories (see Sect. 2.3 for observatory details). The participants takeimages of objects on our target list, perform a basic data reduction(dark/bias and flat-field correction) and submit these reduced im-ages for inclusion into our database via our web-interface2.
The aim of HOYS-CAPS is the long term, multi-filter opticalphotometric monitoring of young (age less than 10 Myr), nearby(distances typically within 1 kpc) star clusters or star forming re-gions visible from the northern hemisphere with small telescopes.There are no restrictions given to the participants in terms of ob-serving cadence, target priority, field of view, integration times orfilter selection.
At the time of writing, the HOYS-CAPS target list contains 17young clusters/regions as well as several additional targets selectedfrom the Gaia Photometric Alerts3, some of which are within theHOYS-CAPS target regions. In total almost 3200 images have beentaken for the project, with a total of almost 970 hrs of observingtime. About 80 % of the HOYS-CAPS images (corresponding to90 % of the observing time) have been obtained with the BeaconObservatory.
2.2 The Beacon Observatory
The majority of the data presented in this paper has been taken bypost-graduate student observers at the University of Kent’s BeaconObservatory. The Beacon Observatory consists of a 17′′ PlanewaveCorrected Dall-Kirkham (CDK) Astrograph telescope situated atthe University of Kent (51.296633◦ North, 1.053267◦ East, 69 melevation). The telescope is equipped with a 4k× 4k Peltier-cooledCCD camera and a B, V, R, I, Hα filter set. The pixel scale ofthe detector is 0.956′′, giving the camera a field of view of about1◦× 1◦. Due to the optical system of the telescope the corners ofthe detector are heavily vignetted. Hence the usable field of view ofthe detector is a circular area with a diameter of approximately 1◦.
The observatory has, despite its location, a good record forobservations. Over the first two years of operations an average of10 nights per month were used for science observations, with anaverage of 50 hrs per month usable, i.e. just above 50 % of the timeis used in each night with clear skies. The typical seeing in theimages is about 3′′ – 4′′.
Images taken by the observatory for the HOYS-CAPS projectare typically taken in the following sequence: 120 s integrations are
2 http://astro.kent.ac.uk/HOYS-CAPS/3 http://gsaweb.ast.cam.ac.uk/alerts/alertsindex
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 3
done in V, R, and I and this sequence is repeated 8 times. Includ-ing filter changes and CCD readout, this sequence takes one hour.All individual images are dark and bias subtracted and flat-fieldedusing sky-flats. All images taken of a particular target during a se-quence are median averaged using the Montage software package4.
2.3 Details on additional Observatories used
Here we give a brief description of the other observatories and tele-scopes used to obtain data for the HOYS-CAPS project.
Selztal-Observatory: The observatory is located in Friesen-heim, approximately 20 km South of Mainz in Germany. The tele-scope is a 20′′ Newton, with f = 2030 mm and an ASA correctorand an ASA DDM 85 Pro mount. The CCD used is a STL 11000Mwith anti-blooming gate and a set of RGB filters is available. Twi-light flats are taken to correct for variations in pixel sensitivity andimage processing is performed with the Maxim DL software. Typi-cal exposure times are 120 – 300 s and observations are guided withan accuracy of less than one pixel and seeing of about 3′′. Due tosurrounding street lights, there are some gradients left in the im-ages not corrected for by the flat- field, but they do not influencethe photometry.
Ponteland Observatory: The observatory is based in Pon-teland (about 10 km North-West of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) at55.0525◦ North, 1.73889◦ West. The telescope used is a 235 mmSCT (f/6.3) with an Atik460 mono camera and Bessel B, V, R, I, Cfilters. This provided a plate scale of approx 0.63′′/pixel and a fieldof view of 29′× 23′. Typical seeing in the images is around 3′′ andexposures times range from 30 s to 120 s depending on target andfilter.
Steyning Observatory: The observatory is situated in Steyn-ing, West Sussex, UK. The telescope is an 8′′(200 mm) RitcheyChretien (f/8.0) operating at a focal length of 1600 mm with aSanta Barbara Instrument Group (SBIG) STF-8300M mono cam-era, and a ’green’ filter from a tri-colour imaging set made by As-tronomik. Using 2 x 2 binned pixels, this provides a plate scale ofabout 1.4′′/pixel with a field of view of 39′× 29′. Integration timesfor the images range from 60 s to 240 s. Image calibration (darks,flat-fields and stacking) is carried out with the AstroArt software.
Piers Sellers Observatory: The observatory is run by theCranbrook and District Science and Astronomy Society (CAD-SAS) situated in Cranbrook in Kent – about 20 km East of RoyalTunbridge Wells. The telescope is the 0.57 m ’Alan Young’ f/4.7Newtonian reflector which uses a ZWO ASI 174 MM (mono-cooled) camera at prime focus. Typically images are taken as10× 10 s integrations and are co-added. Calibration is performedusing the Deep Sky Stacker5 or AIP4WIN software (Berry & Bur-nell 2005).
Astcote Observatory: The observatory is situated about15 km South-West of Northampton. The telescope is a C9.25′′
(f/6.3) with a Starlight Xpress MX916 CCD and EQ6 mount. Typ-ically images are taken with a V-Band filter with 35 s integrationtime. Basic calibrations with darks and sky flats are performed us-ing the AIP4Win image processing software.
High Halden Observatory: This observatory situated 15 kmSouth-West of Ashford, Kent. The telescope is a Takahashi Ep-silon 180ED 8′′ (f/2.8) hyperbolic Newtonian. The camera usedis a Canon 350D digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) with all
4 http://montage.ipac.caltech.edu/5 http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html
internal filters removed and a Baader IR/UV cut filter is used inconjunction. Integration times for the images range from 80 minto 180 min in 5 min sub-exposures. Image calibration (flats, darks,bias and stacking) is performed with Christian Buil’s IRIS soft-ware.
Shobdon Observatory: The observatory is situated in Here-fordshire about 8 km from the UK/Wales Border. It houses a MeadeLX200 35 cm SCT (f/7.7) operating at a focal length of 2500 mmwith a Starlight XPress SXV-H9 CCD and a set of Johnson-CousinsB, V, R and I filters. Integration times are typically 60 s and darksand flats are applied using AIP4WIN software.
University of Leicester Observatory: The University of Le-icester runs a 0.5 m telescope (the University of Leicester 50cm,or UL50). This is a 20′′ Planewave CDK telescope with a SBIGST2000XM camera. It is equipped with a Johnson-Cousins B, V, R,I filter-set. Data were reduced using dark, bias and flat-frames takenthe same night as science observations, using an IRAF pipeline.
Thuringian State Observatory: The Thüringer Landesstern-warte is operating its Alfred-Jensch 2-m telescope6 near Taut-enburg (50.980111◦ North, 11.711167◦ East, 341 m elevation).For HOYS-CAPS the telescope is used in its Schmidt configura-tion (clear aperture 1.34 m, mirror diameter 2.00 m, focal length4.00 m). It is equipped with a 2k× 2k liquid nitrogen-cooled CCDcamera and with a B, V, R, I, Hα filter set. The employed SITe CCDhas 24µm× 24µm pixels, leading to a field of view of 42′× 42′.Single exposures of 20 to 120 s integration time – depending onthe filter – are obtained, and several consecutive frames may be co-added. Dark frames and dome-flats are used for image calibration.
LCO telescopes: In addition, some of the amateur as-tronomers used access to the range of telescopes from the LasCumbres Observatory (LCO). LCO provides a range of 2 m, 1 mand 0.4 m telescopes located at various sites around the Earth to al-low complete longitudinal coverage. The two 2 m telescopes are theFaulkes telescopes built by Telescope Technologies Ltd. which aref/10 Ritchey-Cretien optical systems. The 1 m telescopes are alsoRitchey-Cretien systems with f/7.95, while the 0.4 m telescopes areMeade 16′′ RCX telescopes. Data included in this work has beentaken on Haleakala Observatory (0.4 m, 2 m), Siding Spring Obser-vatory (0.4 m, 1 m) and Tenerife (0.4 m). All data from LCO arereturned reduced with dark and flat-field corrections applied. Inte-gration times are typically 60 s but depend on the target and tele-scope size.
2.4 General data calibration
The astrometric solutions for all images obtained for the HOYS-CAPS project are determined using the astrometry.net soft-ware (Hogg et al. 2008). Photometry for all images is performedusing the Source Extractor (Bertin & Arnouts 1996).
As indicated above, the data included in the analysis for thispaper comes mostly from the Beacon Observatory but is supportedby a variety of other telescopes. Hence, a mix of CCD camerasand DSLRs was used to capture these supporting images. All dataincluded in the analysis of this paper has either been taken in astandard Johnson or Cousins optical or I-band filter or as part of atri-colour RGB filter from a DSLR.
All photometry obtained from each image has been calibratedrelative to one of the Beacon Observatory datasets. Hence, for each
6 http://www.tls-tautenburg.de/TLS/index.php?id=25&L=1
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
4 Froebrich et al.
target (see Sect. 3.1) and filter (VRI) we identified a deep imagetaken under photometric conditions as instrumental magnitude ref-erence frame. All other magnitudes from all other images havebeen calibrated relative to these references. This has been done bymatching all stars in the images to the respective reference frame.Only stars detected with a flag of ’0’ from the Source Extractor (seeBertin & Arnouts (1996) for details), indicating no problems withthe photometry, have been used to obtain the calibration equation.To convert the instrumental magnitudes (mi) of each image intothe calibrated instrumental magnitudes (m) of the reference framethe following steps are performed: i) For all stars determine themagnitude difference (∆m = mi −mr) between the instrumentalmagnitudes and the magnitudes in the reference frame (mr) andplot against mi (see top panel in Fig. 1); ii) Using a least-squareoptimization find the best fitting eight parameters for the functionf(mi) that minimize mr − f(mi). Equation 1 shows the parame-terisation of f(mi), where P4(mi) denotes a 4th order polynomialand the other term is a photocurve function proposed by Bacheret al. (2005) and Moffat (1969); iii) Determine the calibrated mag-nitudes for all stars using m = f(mi); iv) Plot the differencem −mr against the calibrated magnitudes to check if the calibra-tion has been successful (see bottom panel in Fig. 1).
f(mi) = A · log(
10B·(mi−C) + 1
)+ P4(mi) (1)
Typically the calibration has an accuracy of a few percent forstars brighter than 14th or 15th magnitude, which rises to 0.2 magfor the faintest detected stars. See Fig. 1 for an example of howthe calibration works for data from IC 348 taken in a green (TG)filter at the Seltztal-Observatory when calibrated into the V-Bandreference data. When the calibration has not resulted in these typ-ical uncertainties (less than 0.2 mag scatter for the faintest objectsand less than 0.05 mag for the brighter stars), the images have beenremoved from the analysis in this paper. The reasons for these ex-clusions are usually strongly non-photometric observing conditionswhich alter the observed colour of stars or the use of filters whichare too different for an accurate calibration without the inclusion ofcolour terms.
The absence of colour terms in the calibration will not influ-ence the results obtained in this work. As indicated in Sect. 2.1,the vast majority of data has been taken with a single instrument -the Beacon Observatory. All images with a large scatter in the cali-bration where removed from the analysis. For the investigation weonly select stars with more than 0.2 mag variability (see Sect. 3.1).To further ensure that no variability in the sources is induced bycolour effects, all parameters determined for individual sources inthe paper are based on observations in the standard V, R and I-Bandfilters only. We demonstrate in Fig. 2 that there are no significantsystematic trends of the calibrated instrumental V-band magnitudesand V-I colours between different telescope and filter combinations.
3 DATA ANALYSIS
3.1 Selection of Young Clusters and their variable YSOs
For the analysis presented in this paper we selected the eight clus-ters/regions from the HOYS-CAPS target list which had the mostobservations available as of May 2017. These are: NGC 7129,IC 5070, NGC 2264, IC 1396 A, IC 348, NGC 1333, IC 5146 and
Figure 1. Example of the calibration of an image of IC 348 in a green (TG)filter into the V filter. Top panel: Difference (mi−mr) of the instrumentalmagnitudes between the TG image and the V-Band reference dataset. Theblue line indicates the running median of the data-points and the two verti-cal lines indicate the range of instrumental magnitudes considered. Bottompanel: Difference (m − mr) between the calibrated TG data and the V-Band reference frame. The larger (red) dots indicate stars with no problemsin the photometry, while the remaining stars are shown as smaller (black)dots. The dotted (green) data points indicate the one sigma scatter for starswithin 0.5 mag and the two vertical lines the range of magnitudes in whichstars are included in the calibration.
NGC 2244. We present the basic data for these clusters (positions,distances, ages, number variable stars selected etc.) in Table 1.
In this paper we aim to generally characterise all variableYSOs in the above selected eight clusters. To achieve this wefirst cross-matched the optical photometry catalogues for our ob-served fields with catalogues of known and suspected members foreach of the regions. In particular we used the following lists: Luh-man et al. (2016) for NGC 1333 and IC 348; Dahm & Hillenbrand(2015) and Stelzer & Scholz (2009) for NGC 7129; Sicilia-Aguilaret al. (2005) for IC 1396 A; Dahm & Simon (2005) and Cody et al.(2014) for NGC 2264; Balog et al. (2007) for NGC 2244; Rebullet al. (2011) for IC 5070; and Harvey et al. (2008) for IC 5146.These catalogues are inhomogeneous in completeness, depth andselection criteria. In this work, they are only used to select variableyoung stars in these clusters which are detected in our optical data.
We then investigated the light-curves of all these YSO candi-date members in each region. As we are trying to analyse the sta-tistical behaviour of variable young stars, only objects which ful-filled the following criteria where selected for further analysis: i)There are more than 15 nights of data with photometry in V, R andI (or equivalent filter) taken in the same night; ii) The differencein magnitude between the brightest and faintest V-band measure-ment has to be larger than 0.2 mag (corresponding to about 5σ forthe brighter stars); iii) The Stetson index (Stetson 1996) has to be
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 5
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5V1-I1 [mag]
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
V 1-V
2 [m
ag]
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5V1-I1 [mag]
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
(V1-I
1)-(V
2-I2)
[mag
]
Figure 2. Differences of calibrated instrumental V-Band magnitudes and V-I colours for one of our targets. An index of 1 indicates data taken with the BeaconObservatory, while an index of 2 indicates data taken with the LCO. There are no significant and systematic trends of these differences with the V-I colour ofthe stars. Note that the V and I data for each telescope has been taken on the same night, but there is an observing time difference of several weeks betweenthe two datasets, thus the outlier data-points represent variable stars.
Table 1. Properties of star forming regions and clusters investigated in this work. In the Table we list the following: name; position in RA/DEC (J2000) asused in the HOYS-CAPS project; total number of potential YSOs detected in at least 15 images; number of variable stars selected (total number, number ofYSO candidates and number of other variable stars with high Stetson index); fraction of YSO candidates that are variable; fraction of variable objects thatare classified as CTTSs (fvarCTTS) or transition/depletion disk objects (fvarWTTS); distance in [pc]; age in [Myr]; The references for distances and ages for thedifferent regions are indicated in the name column and are from: (1) Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2005); (2) Contreras et al. (2002); (3) Bally et al. (2008); (4)
Reipurth & Schneider (2008); (5) Guieu et al. (2009); (6) Harvey et al. (2008); (7) Scholz et al. (2013); (8) Román-Zúñiga & Lada (2008); (9) Dahm (2008);(10) Straižys et al. (2014). Typically the distance uncertainties are 10 – 20 %, but they are probably much higher for IC 5146.
Name RA DEC Ntot Nvar fYSOvar fvarCTTS fvarWTTS d age
(J2000) YSO tot YSO var [%] [%] [%] [pc] [Myr]IC 1396 A(1,2) 21 36 35 +57 30 36 68 56 42 14 62 34 66 900 1 – 5
IC 348(3) 03 44 34 +32 09 48 88 37 36 1 41 49 51 300 2 – 4IC 5070(4,5) 20 51 00 +44 22 00 152 107 105 2 69 87 13 600 3IC 5146(6) 21 53 29 +47 16 01 166 67 58 9 35 57 43 950 1 – 5
NGC 1333(7) 03 29 02 +31 20 54 30 19 17 2 57 74 26 300 1 – 3NGC2244(8) 06 31 55 +04 56 30 544 65 54 11 10 34 66 1400 – 1700 2 – 3NGC2264(9) 06 40 58 +09 53 42 124 79 73 6 59 67 33 760 1 – 5
NGC 7129(10) 21 42 56 +66 06 12 35 36 28 8 80 39 61 1150 3
larger than one. These criteria ensure that our sample is not signif-icantly contaminated by non-variable stars with large photometricerrors. The numbers of targets selected by our criteria in each re-gion are listed in Table 1. In each cluster/region we analysed someadditional objects which are not in one of the catalogues but ful-fill the above criteria for variability. Their numbers are indicatedseparately in Table 1.
3.2 Determination of light-curve properties
For each selected individual star we determined a number of light-curve properties from the available data. An example of some setsof light-curves can be found in Figs. 7, 8, and 9. These propertiesare the following:
• We fit a linear function (see Eq. 2) to the N data-points in theV-I vs. V colour-magnitude diagram to determine the slope (α) –indicated as green lines in the right hand side panels of Figs. 7, 8,and 9. This has been done by minimising the sum over all perpen-dicular distances of the data-points to the line of best fit (see Eq. 3)to ensure that for all extreme cases (colour independent magnitude
changes and magnitude independent colour changes), the correctslope is determined. We determine the rms value of all perpendic-ular distances to the line of best fit. We remove any outliers furtherthan three times the rms away from the line of best fit iteratively.These rms values are almost exclusively larger than the photomet-ric uncertainties of the individual data-points on both axes and thusonly real outliers, such as in the case of V 350 Cep (Fig. 8) are re-moved. To ensure the procedure has worked for all objects, wemanually inspected the graphs for all targets. For ease of presen-tation of the α-values, we have converted them into degrees as oth-erwise some of the slopes have very large numerical values. Notethat the photometric uncertainties of the data-points on both axesare correlated. This, however, has the effect of shifting data-pointsparallel to the α = 45◦ directions, and has thus no significant in-fluence on the determined values.
V = V0 + α(V − I) (2)
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
6 Froebrich et al.
010
2030
4050
Hei
ght
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Figure 3. Resulting dendrogram of our hierarchical clustering analysis of the YSOs light-curves in our sample. The groups of YSOs identified are labeled atthe bottom. All outliers on the right hand side of the dendrogram are combined into group 7. The main Table A1 in the Appendix lists the group number foreach individual YSO.
N∑i=1
|V0(V − I) + α− V |√V 20 + 1
(3)
• After the calculation of the line of best fit and removal of out-lying data-points, we determine the scatter (rms) of the data-pointsin the V-I vs V colour-magnitude diagram perpendicular to the lineof best fit.• Following Cody et al. (2014) we determine the asym-
metry metric (M ) for the V-Band light-curve using M =(〈d10%〉 − dmed) /σd, where 〈d10%〉 is the mean of all magnitudesin the top and bottom ten percent of the V-Band light-curve, dmed
the median of all magnitudes and σd the overall rms of the V-Banddata-points from the mean.• Following Stetson (1996) we determine the Stetson index for
the V-Band light-curve.• We determine a cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the
V-Band magnitudes after subtracting the median magnitude fromeach data-point.
We then use a two-sided, two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov(KS) test to compare the CDFs of all objects against each otherpairwise and record the KS statistics (DKS) and resulting p-value.This value indicates the probability that the two samples (V-BandCDFs) are drawn from the same parent distribution. Hence, largep-values indicate pairs of stars with very similar distribution of V-Band magnitudes and vice versa.
3.3 YSO near and mid-IR SEDs
We have cross matched the objects investigated here with the WISEAll-sky catalogue (Cutri & et al. 2013) and the 2MASS catalogue(Skrutskie et al. 2006). For some of our target regions there areSpitzer observations which are deeper than the WISE data. How-ever, they are not available for all fields to a homogeneous depth,which we have for our optical data. Since more than 90 % of ourobjects have a WISE match in all four filters, we do not include theSpitzer data in our analysis. The WISE data has been used to deter-
mine the slope of the spectral energy distribution (αSED) between3.4µm and 22µm. Following Majaess (2013) we use:
αSED = 0.36·(w1−w2)+0.58·(w2−w3)+0.41·(w3−w4)−2.90(4)
Traditionally, objects with positive slopes αSED are classifiedas protostars, while negative slopes between −2 and zero indicateclassical T-Tauri stars (CTTSs). Koenig & Leisawitz (2014) havepresented a colour selection scheme in WISE to differentiate Class Iprotostars and Class II CTTSs based not just on αSED but con-sidering all WISE colours (excluding the W4 magnitudes). Thereis no specific WISE colour selection for Weak-Line T-Tauri Stars(WTTS) as their colours overlap too much with normal stars as wellas other objects such as AGB stars.
3.4 Hierarchical clustering of YSO light-curve properties
We aim to identify objects with similar light-curve properties au-tomatically via a hierarchical clustering method. Here we brieflydescribe the methods involved. A more detailed discussion of themcan be found in Campbell-White et al. (2018, subm.).
As a first step we establish a dissimilarity matrix which con-tains the pairwise distances (d(i,j)) between each pair of YSOs (i,j)for each of the properties. From the KS-test we already have dKS
(i,j)
which is identical to the KS statistic DKS. We also determine thesedistances for each of the other properties, i.e. dα(i,j) = |αi − αj|for the slopes in the V-I vs V colour magnitude diagram; drms(i,j) =|rmsi − rmsj| for the scatter of the data-points from the line ofbest fit in the same diagram, and dM(i,j) = |Mi −Mj| for the asym-metry metric of the V-Band light-curves.
To account for the different ranges in these four parameters, allthe individual distances are normalised by the mean of all pairwisedistances for the respective parameter. The final pairwise dissimi-larity between two stars, considering all of the parameters is thencalculated as:
d(i,j) =
√√√√(dKS(i,j)
dKS
)2
+
(dα(i,j)
dα
)2
+
(drms(i,j)
drms
)2
+
(dM(i,j)
dM
)2
(5)
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 7
An Euclidean distance matrix is then calculated from thed(i,j)-values (see Campbell-White et al. (2018, subm.) for details)and hierarchical clustering is performed on it to identify groupsof YSOs with similar properties. Note that we will use ’groups’throughout the paper when referring to these statistical associa-tions, rather than ’cluster/region’ which refers to the investigatedyoung clusters from which the YSOs are selected.
Groups are created from hierarchical clustering by consider-ing, in the first instance, the distance between pairs of objects. Pairswith the smallest distances are joined, forming the first groups. Re-cursive merging then takes place, where at each stage, new inter-group distances are determined. The manner in which this hap-pens depends on which hierarchical method is used. We have usedWard’s agglomerative method to form groups (Murtagh & Leg-endre 2014), which seeks to minimise the distance between thecentres of groups in Euclidean space, and has been shown to out-perform other hierarchical methods (Ferreira & Hitchcock 2009).Groups are iteratively formed until the final two groups merge. Thisprocess is represented by a dendrogram. Figure 3 shows all individ-ual YSOs along the bottom, and groups are seen as the horizontalmerges. The height on the dendrogram corresponds to the distanceat which a merge was made, for pairs of YSOs, this was the Eu-clidean distance we have described, for all higher level groups, theheight was taken from the value obtained with Ward’s method.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Selection of variable YSOs
Our selection criteria for variable YSOs in the eight investigatedregions have identified 466 objects which are included in the anal-ysis in this paper. Of these, 413 (89 %) are included in one of thecatalogues of potential cluster members, the remaining 53 objects(11 %) are included solely due to their variability. Hence, the sam-ple of variables investigated will only contain a very small fractionof potentially non-YSO variables such as background giant stars. InTable 1 we detail the number of investigated variable stars in eachof the clusters, split by their mode of selection. This table can beused as a compendium of variable YSOs in future studies, togetherwith the main Table A1 in the Appendix where all individual starsand their properties are listed.
We estimate the fraction of variable stars (fYSOvar ) amongst the
detected YSOs. These fractions are also listed in Table 1. The meanfraction of variable stars is 52 % with a rms variation of 22 % be-tween the individual regions. The highest fraction of variables (with80 %) occurs in NGC 7129. In NGC 2244 the fraction is the lowestwith only 10 % of the detected stars classified as variable. Thesenumbers are only included here for completeness reasons, since (asindicated above) the strong variations in them are most likely a re-flection of the our selection method and biases than that they areintrinsic to the properties of the regions (such as the age). Variabil-ity is expected to decline with the age of the region, and our abilityto detect it will depend on the distance and extinction.
The colour-colour diagrams shown in Fig. 4 reveal that thereare two distinct groups of objects in our sample of variable YSOs.The left panel of Fig. 4 shows the W1-W2 vs H-K diagram. It indi-cates the typical colours of CTTS from Koenig & Leisawitz (2014)and a large number of objects fall in or near the CTTS region. Notethat protostars would be situated towards redder colours along bothaxes. A second group of objects with almost zero W1-W2 colouris also evident. The same two groups of objects can be identified
in the right panel of Fig. 4 which shows the W3-W4 vs W1-W2colour-colour diagram. One finds that the objects with low W1-W2 colours, falling below the marked box, show in part large W3-W4 values, thus indicating the presence of some cold disk material.These objects are thus most likely either transition disks with innergaps or depleted disks.
Thus, for the purpose of this paper we characterise all sourceswith W1-W2> 0.3 mag as CTTS and all other sources as transi-tion/depleted disks (referred to as WTTS, hereafter). Note that thiscriterion is only applicable as the vast majority of our sources areselected as known YSOs which are also variable, hence there is al-most no contamination of non-YSOs in the sample. The fractionof CTTSs amongst the variables has been listed as fvarCTTS in Ta-ble 1. The mean CTTS fraction in the full sample is 64 % (271 ob-jects). The highest value in an individual region (87 %) is found inIC 5070 and the lowest (34 %) in IC 1396 A and NGC 2244. Thereare no apparent trends between these fractions and the age of thecluster/region they are in.
4.2 YSO groups from the Hierarchical Clustering
The hierarchical clustering results are presented in the dendrogramin Fig. 3. Usually the dendrogram is cut at a specific, albeit arbi-trary, height to select groups of objects. We have chosen a value of10 as the height at which the cut is made. This results in 6 cleargroups (referred to as G hereafter) and some outliers. In Table A1we list for each individual YSO which group it belongs to. One wayof justifying the choice of the cut value is to read the dendrogramfrom the top down and to investigate if the identified groups shareany physical properties.
The first branch that separates from the majority of objectsis seen on the right hand side and contains 8 objects. These ob-jects have basically no common properties with all of the remainingsources and are hence placed in G 7 (labeled in Fig. 3 together withall the other groups). The next separation in the dendrogram splitsGs 1, 2, 3 from Gs 4, 5, 6. As will be discussed later and indicatedin Fig. 5, this splits the light-curves with dips from the light-curveswhich are symmetric or have outbursts.
The next split in the objects with dipper light-curve separatesG 1 from the rest. According to Fig. 5, G 1 contains the most ex-treme dippers. The final split into G 2 and G 3 separates the objectswith almost colour-independent dips (G 3) from the remaining dip-pers (G 2). Similarly, the first split of the burster light-curves sep-arates the most extreme bursters (G 4) from the rest, which is thensplit into less extreme burster and symmetric light-curves (Gs 6, 5).
4.3 α-values and M -values
In Fig. 5 we have plotted the positions of all variable objects (ex-cept the outliers in G 7) in the α –M plane of the parameter space.Objects from the different groups are indicated by different coloursand symbols. We also indicate the average values and rms of allobjects in each group. As one can see from this diagram and the dis-cussion above, the hierarchical clustering seems to have separatedthe groups most clearly in this part of the parameter space. Thereis only minimal overlap between the groups with the exception ofsome scattered objects in G 4. The groups are (with the exceptionof G 2), separated by the asymmetry parameter M . Furthermore,the parameter space is not filled homogeneously. There are almost
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
8 Froebrich et al.
0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4W1-W2 [mag]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
H-K
[mag
]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6W3-W4 [mag]
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
W1-
W2
[mag
]Figure 4. NIR/MIR colour-colour diagrams of the variable objects investigated. Left: WISE W1-W2 vs H-K 2MASS colour-colour plot. The dashed blacklines enclose the region of CTTSs from Koenig & Leisawitz (2014). Class I protostars would be situated towards the top-right part of the diagram. Right:WISE W3-W4 vs W1-W2 diagram. The dashed black lines enclose the region for transition disks from Koenig & Leisawitz (2014). The two distinct groupsof sources, separated by W1-W2 = 0.3 mag, can be clearly seen in both panels. The colours and symbols indicate membership in each of the groups identifiedwith the hierarchical clustering: G 1 – black circles; G 2 – dark blue squares; G 3 – light blue triangles up; G 4 – green triangles down; G 5 – brown stars; G 6– pink x’s; All outliers in G 7 are not shown.
Table 2. Table with data of number/fraction of YSOs per region/cluster and group in dendrogram. We list the number (N ) of objects in each of the groupsfrom each young region/cluster. The first number in the brackets indicates what fraction N represents in the region/cluster expressed in percent. The secondnumber indicates what fraction N represents in the group. For example for IC 5070 in G2 we find 13 (12,31), which means there are 13 objects in the regionIC 5070 which are part of G 2 and these sources represent 12 % of all the objects in IC 5070 and 31 % of all the objects in G 2. The numbers in brackets in the’Total’ row and column indicate the fraction of the total number of source in the sample. Note that due to rounding errors the fractions do not necessarily addup to 100 %.
Cluster G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 TotalIC 1396 A 4 ( 7,12) 7 (13,17) 17 (30,16) 4 ( 7,10) 11 (20,10) 12 (21,10) 1 ( 2,13) 56 (12)
IC 348 0 ( 0, 0) 2 ( 5, 5) 6 (16, 6) 7 (19,18) 6 (16, 5) 14 (38,12) 2 ( 5,25) 37 ( 8)IC 5070 4 ( 4,12) 13 (12,31) 20 (19,19) 5 ( 5,13) 40 (37,35) 25 (23,21) 0 ( 0, 0) 107 (23)IC 5146 10 (15,29) 5 ( 7,12) 16 (24,15) 1 ( 1, 3) 18 (27,16) 17 (25,14) 0 ( 0, 0) 67 (14)
NGC 1333 3 (16, 9) 2 (11, 5) 4 (21, 4) 0 ( 0, 0) 2 (11, 2) 7 (37, 6) 1 ( 5,13) 19 ( 4)NGC 2244 5 ( 8,15) 4 ( 6,10) 18 (28,17) 6 ( 9,15) 15 (23,13) 17 (26,14) 0 ( 0, 0) 65 (14)NGC 2264 8 (10,24) 9 (11,21) 20 (25,19) 8 (10,20) 14 (18,12) 20 (25,17) 0 ( 0, 0) 79 (17)NGC 7129 0 ( 0, 0) 0 ( 0, 0) 7 (19, 6) 9 (25,23) 7 (19, 6) 9 (25, 7) 4 (11,50) 36 ( 8)
Total 34 ( 7) 42 ( 9) 108 (23) 40 ( 9) 113 (24) 121 (26) 8 ( 2) 466
no sources with α-values lower than 40◦ and objects with negativeM -values and high α-values are extremely rare.
The value of the α parameter indicates the amount of colourchange during brightness change. Objects with large values (closeto 90◦) basically do not change their colour at all. These objects canfor example be eclipsing binaries where both components have sim-ilar colours. Changes in brightness due to variability in the amountof absorbing and scattering material along the line of sight (e.g.from the accretion disk) generally changes the colour in a deter-minable way. If the disk material is made from normal ISM dustthen the α-value should be between 60◦ (RV = 3.1) and 66◦
(RV = 5.0) if one uses a standard reddening law (Mathis 1990).Higher values of α are possible if the obscuring material consistsof larger dust grains than in the normal ISM or the objects undergoeclipse events by optically thick material.
Light-curves with α < 55◦ are thus not consistent withvariability due to changes in extinction alone. Objects that showα ≈ 45◦ change their brightness in the V-Band but not at a de-tectable level in the I-Band. This can in principle be caused by non-variable red sources which are at the detection limit in V but de-
tected at high signal-to-noise in the I-Band. However, our selectioncriteria for the variable sources will have removed these reliably.Alternatively, these objects can be interpreted as sources with largefluctuations at visual wavelengths and small, undetected variationsin the infrared. Hence, the most likely cause for the variability inobjects with α < 55◦ is changes in the accretion rate or the prop-erties of large hot/cold spots. Thus, based on the α-value we canclassify the sources in the following three categories:
• 65◦≤ α ≤ 90◦: Light-curves consistent with variable extinc-tion due to larger grains or eclipses by optically thick material• 55◦≤ α ≤ 65◦: Light-curves consistent with variable extinc-
tion due to normal ISM dust grains• 35◦≤ α ≤ 55◦: Light-curves not consistent with variable ex-
tinction, thus most likely caused by changes in accretion rates orhot/cold surface spots
Naturally there will be sources whose properties are a mix ofmore than one of these physical reasons for variability. Hence thesecategories will only be indicative of what the main reason for thevariability in a group of objects might be if it falls within one of
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 9
30 40 50 60 70 80 90Slope ( ) in V vs V-I diagram [deg]
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Asym
etry
Inde
x (M
) of V
-Ban
d Lig
htcu
rve 1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 5. Figure showing the slope α in the V vs V-I diagram and theasymmetry index M for the YSOs in our sample. The larger symbols anderror bars indicate the mean and rms of all stars in the different groups.The group number is also indicated. All outliers (summarised in G 7) arenot shown as they are partly outside the parameter space of the plot (e.g. atnegative slope values). The colours and symbols are the same as in Fig. 4.The dashed horizontal lines separate the dippers (top) from the symmetriclight-curves (middle) and the bursters (bottom). The thin dashed horizontallines separate the most extreme bursters and dippers. The dashed verticallines indicate the three regions for α discussed in the text.
the specified regions for the α-values. In total there are 252 objectswhose α-value is in agreement of their variability being dominatedby accretion rate changes or spots. In the group that is dominatedby variable ISM extinction there are 94 sources, and in the groupof objects which are most likely due to variable extinction by largergrains or eclipses we have 108 sources. The remaining objects falloutside this part of the parameter space.
We can also split the sample of sources according to the asym-metry metric M . As detailed in Cody et al. (2014) objects withnegative values are bursters, i.e. objects that show short durationincreases in brightness compared to their normal magnitudes. Onthe other hand, objects with positive values for M are dippers,which have short duration decreases in brightness compared to nor-mal. Cody et al. (2014) use ±0.25 as thresholds for M to identifybursters and dippers. Here we employ a slightly more conservativevalue and will identify an object as burster if M < −0.5, whileobjects with M > 0.5 are considered dippers. Objects with M -values in-between these borders are considered to have a symmet-ric behaviour. In total our sample contains 41 bursters, 101 dippersand 324 symmetric variables. If we use an even more conservativethreshold of M ± 0.75 to select the most extreme bursters and dip-pers we find 10 and 51, respectively.
From this discussion and from Fig. 5 it is clear that our objectsdo not fill the parameter space homogeneously. In particular thereis not a single object whose properties are in agreement with vari-ability due to eclipse events (α near 90◦), which at the same timebelongs into the burster group. This is understandable, since almostall eclipsing binary objects spend most of their time outside theeclipse state and eclipsing binaries that also show outbursts mightbe characterised as having a ’symmetric’ light-curve.
As already briefly discussed in Sect. 4.2 the groups of YSOsgenerated by the hierarchical clustering, do not have a simple one-to-one matching with any one of the physical characteristics, but
30 40 50 60 70 80 90Slope ( ) in V vs V-I diagram [deg]
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
75%
Var
iabi
lity
(75
) [m
ag]
1
1
22
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
Figure 6. Figures showing the 75 % variability (σ75) in V and R for thegroups identified with the hierarchical clustering. The green symbols indi-cate σ75
V and the red symbols σ75R . The symbol types, numbers and colour
of the lines are the same as in Fig. 4.
there are clear trends. Most of the objects in G 4 fall into the burstercategory and most of them also are in agreement with having vari-able accretion rates or spots. Indeed more than 50 % of the G 4members are in the accretion burst/spot category. Similarly, mem-bers in G 1 are almost exclusively in agreement with dipper light-curves, most of them in the extreme category. Most of the light-curves in G 1 are either in agreement with variable extinction oreclipses, only four sources fall into the variable accretion rate/spotcategory. All the sources in G 2 fall into the eclipse category, andall of the light-curves are symmetric. The objects sorted into theother groups (G 3, 5, 6) are all a mix of accretion/spot and extinc-tion variability, where G 3 contains objects with slightly dippinglight-curves. G 5/G 6 contain symmetric light-curves with slightlypositive M -values in G 5 and negative ones in G 6.
4.4 Variability
We determine the typical variability in the V-Band and R-Bandfor groups of YSOs identified in the hierarchical clustering. Thisutilises the total CDF for all magnitudes determined as the averageof all individual CDFs of all stars in each group. We then determinethe magnitude range around the median value within which 75 %of the brightness measurements are situated and refer to this fromhere on as 75 % variability or σ75.
In Fig. 6 we show σ75 of all groups in the V and R-Band plot-ted against the average α-value. In all cases, σ75
V is larger than σ75R
by at least about 0.1 mag. The lowest variability (about 0.5 mag inV and 0.4 mag in R) is measured for Gs 3, 5, 6 which represent thesymmetric light-curves. Slightly higher variability (0.7 mag in Vand 0.6 mag in R) is found for Gs 1, 2. These are all objects whoselight-curves can be characterised as dippers and all of them are alsoin agreement with variable extinction or eclipse behaviour.
The most variable sources (about 1.1 mag in V and 0.7 mag inR) are the objects in G 4, i.e. the objects most likely in agreementwith outbursts due to variable accretion rates (the magnitudes of thevariability in this group exclude spots as causes in most cases). Ob-jects in this group also show the largest difference σ75
V −σ75R . While
for all other groups there is only a 0.1 mag difference between the
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
10 Froebrich et al.
V and R filters, for G 4 the difference is 0.4 mag. This can only inpart be explained by the low α-values of the sources, as especiallyGs 5, 6 have similar values, but the difference in variability from Rand V is much smaller, both in absolute and relative terms.
4.5 YSO properties in Clusters/SF Regions
In Table 2 we have indicated for each group from the hierarchi-cal clustering the number of members and how they are distributedamongst the investigated young clusters and SF regions. We findthat there are three groups (Gs 2, 5, 6) which roughly contain onequarter of all the sources each. The remaining three groups (Gs 1,2, 4) each roughly contain 10 % of all the objects. The fraction ofsources considered outliers (summarised in G 7) is extremely smallwith less than 2 % but this group naturally contains the most un-usual objects in the sample.
We have checked if any cluster or SF region has an abnormallyhigh/low representation of objects in a particular group. There are atwo notable cases: i) A quarter of all objects from NGC 7129 are inG 4, while this group only contains 9 % of all objects; ii) Half of allobjects in G 7 are from NGC 7129, while this region/cluster onlyrepresents 8 % of all objects. Thus, NGC 7129 seems to be unusualin that it contains a larger fraction of YSOs whose light-curves canbe characterised as bursters caused by accretion rate variations. Thecluster also seems to contain a high fraction of objects with unusuallight-curves. However, small number statistics as well as selectionbiases could be responsible for these abnormalities.
An investigation into potential differences in the light-curveproperties of CTTSs and WTTSs in our sample has not led to anysignificant results. There are hints that the fraction of objects whoselight-curves can be interpreted as being caused by occultations bymaterial made up of larger dust grains is increased amongst theWTTS population. This is not statistically significant, however itdoes warrant a more detailed investigation in future.
4.6 Discussion of selected individual Sources
In this section we discuss three selected objects – V 2492 Cyg,V 350 Cep, 2MASS J21383981+5708470 in more detail. The de-termined properties for all individual sources are listed in Table A1in the Appendix.
4.6.1 V 2492 Cyg in IC 5070
The light-curve of V 2492 Cyg is shown in Fig. 7. The source isalso known as IRAS 20496+4354, WISE J205126.22+440523.8or PTF 10 nvg. On 2016-02-22 it was also published as Gaia 16 aft.In Table A1 the source is called R11 T1 205126.22+440523.7, asthis is the designation in the YSO list from Rebull et al. (2011),which we used to select objects in IC 5070.
The object has been studied by numerous authors in the past,e.g. Kun et al. (2011); Aspin (2011); Covey et al. (2011); Kóspálet al. (2011); Hillenbrand et al. (2013); Kóspál et al. (2013); Scholzet al. (2013); Giannini et al. (2017). It also was subject of manyAstronomer’s Telegrams, e.g. Arkharov et al. (2015); Munari et al.(2017); Ibryamov & Semkov (2017); Froebrich et al. (2017). Theobject is considered an embedded Class I protostar that showsstochastic high amplitude variations in brightness. This variabilityis driven by changes in accretion rate as well as extinction (up to∆AV = 30 mag), i.e. restructuring of the inner disk. Near infraredspectra are similar to McNeil’s Nebula (V 1647 Ori) and the source
Figure 7. Light-curve of the star V 2492 Cyg. In the top left panel we showthe instrumental magnitudes (shifted to approximately correspond to theapparent magnitude) for the V, R and I filters. Note that images taken in adifferent filter have been calibrated into the VRI system. The two panels inthe bottom left show the evolution of V-R and V-I colour of the source. Thecolour of the data-points represents the V-Band magnitude. Black symbolscorrespond to the faintest magnitudes and light-gray symbols to brightermagnitudes. The right panel shows the position of all observations in theV-I vs V colour-magnitude diagram. Here the colour of the symbols corre-sponds to the time of the observations. The darkest points correspond to themost recent data. The green line is the line of the best linear fit to the dataafter removing outliers. The red and blue line indicate extinction vectors forAV = 1mag for RV = 3.1 (blue) and RV = 5.0 (red).
might be considered as a young, embedded analogue to UX Oritype stars. Typical variations in brightness occur over timescales ofmonths to years, with a ∼220 day quasi-periodic signal reported inHillenbrand et al. (2013).
All of the data in our light-curve has been included in Froe-brich et al. (2017). There is no indication of the 220 day quasi-periodic signal identified in Hillenbrand et al. (2013). Instead, aftera minimum brightness between April and July 2016, the object hassteadily increased its brightness to a maximum at the end of Jan-uary 2017. The object then declined in brightness and the total vari-ations observed in our data are ∆V≈ 4 mag. The colour-magnitudediagram indicates that the variations are consistent with changingextinction from larger dust grains. However, there are large andsystematic deviations from this simplistic picture, which indicatechanges in accretion rate as well as changes in the properties of theocculting material.
4.6.2 V 350 Cep in NGC 7129
We show the light-curve of V 350 Cep in Fig. 8. The source isalso known as 2MASS J21430000+6611279, NGC 7129 IRS 1 orNGC 7129 FIR 3. In Table A1 the source is called HBC_732, as thisis the designation in the YSO list from Stelzer & Scholz (2009),which we used to select objects in NGC 7129.
The long term light-curve of this object (Ibryamov et al. 2014)shows an about 5 mag increase in the Blue/pg magnitude between1965 and 1975, and the source has remained at this level since withtypical variations of about 0.5 mag. The data presented in Ibryamovet al. (2014) suggest a ’dip’ of up to 1 mag in V for several monthsduring 2009. The source has been interpreted as both FU-Ori and
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 11
Figure 8. As Fig. 7 but for the object V 350 Cep
EX-Lup (EX-Or) candidate by several authors (Dahm & Hillen-brand 2015; Magakian et al. 1999; Miranda et al. 1994). Typi-cal FU-Ori spectral features are missing while EX-Or features arepresent, however the duration of the burst of now approximately45 yrs seems atypical for an EX-Or.
On 2016-04-23 the object was reported as Gaia 16 alt. Itshowed two Gaia data-points clearly below its usual brightness.This event was also reported by Semkov et al. (2017) who cov-ered the occultation event with 7 BVRI data-points. Our light-curvein Fig. 8 shows the event at an even higher time resolution. In to-tal 13 VRI measurements are taken during the occultation event.When combining our data with Semkov et al. (2017) we find thatthe object has been detected in occultation between 2016-04-12 and2016-05-25. Considering the closest data-points outside the occul-tation we estimate a duration of 51 – 83 days for the event. Thelight-curve shows that there are at least two ’dips’ with an inter-mittent maximum on 2016-04-17.
After the occultation the object returned to maximum bright-ness, just to drop again by about 0.5 mag in V, from which ithas then recovered steadily. We find the depth of the minimum tobe ∆V = 2.05 mag, ∆R = 1.80 mag and ∆I = 1.90 mag. These areslightly deeper than reported in Semkov et al. (2017). The colour-magnitude plot shows that the first magnitude of decrease duringthe occultation, as well as the steady recovery of the flux after it,are in good agreement with a variation caused by changes in ex-tinction due to normal ISM dust grains. During the deeper part ofthe occultation, the change in brightness turns completely free ofcolour change. Hence, the denser part of the occulting material re-sponsible for this seems to have consisted of larger dust grains orthe obscuring material was optically thick.
4.6.3 2MASS J21383981+5708470 in IC 1396 A
The light-curve of the source 2MASS J21383981+5708470, alsoknown as [NSW2012] 284 is shown in Fig. 9. This star islisted as Emission Line star in SIMBAD and has been identi-fied in Nakano et al. (2012). In Table A1 the source is calledVariable_V_324.665863_57.146301, as it was added as a variablesource due to its large Stetson index in the V-Band and was not in-cluded in the YSO candidate list from Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2005),which we used to select objects in IC 1396 A.
Figure 9. As Fig. 7 but for the object 2MASS J21383981+5708470
The object shows a smooth brightness increase over about 150days in all three filters. At the peak the brightness increase in Vis about 0.4 mag, while in the I-Band the star got about 0.6 magbrighter. The Stetson index of the source is 1.36 and the asymme-try index -0.74, i.e. the object is classified as burster. What is highlyunusual about this source is the change in colour towards red dur-ing the outburst. The angle in the V vs. V-I diagram is -59◦. This isthe only source in the entire sample with such a behaviour and con-sequently the object has been made part of the outlier group G 7by the hierarchical clustering algorithm. The older I-Band (only)data suggests that there might have been another such burst about600 days prior to the one covered by our survey. But only a smallpart of this potential burst is covered. If this is a periodic behaviour,then the next burst should occur at about MJD = 58300 d – whichis early 2018. The nature of this source is unclear. Usually objectsin outburst are bluer in the bright state. Hence, the object has eitheran unusual burst, or we see only scattered light from this source.
5 CONCLUSIONS
We are describing and presenting the first results of our optical sur-vey of nearby clusters and star forming regions with small tele-scopes. All observations are obtained with the University of Kent’s17′′ Beacon Observatory or as part of the HOYS-CAPS citizen sci-ence project. In this paper we present the analysis of variable starsin eight target fields for which V, R and I-Band data has been takenover a period of about two years.
In our dataset we have identified 466 variable stars, 413 ofwhich are confirmed YSOs, based on the Stetson index of theirlight-curves. For all objects light-curve properties such as the theasymmetry metric and slope (α) in the V-I vs. V colour-magnitudediagram are determined. This sample is one of the largest samplesof variable YSOs in the northern hemisphere with multi colour ob-servations of such a time span and cadence, with additional archivalmulti-wavelength data and which is well suited for follow up ob-servations. We find that the number of protostars in our sample isnegligible, while about 65 % of the objects are CTTSs and about35 % are sources with transition or depleted disks.
A detailed investigation of the asymmetry index M and theα-values of the light-curves has been performed. We can use the α-value to characterise the most likely mechanism responsible for the
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
12 Froebrich et al.
variability in the stars. These range from occultations by materialcomposed of large dust grains or optically thick material (includingeclipses) to occultations by material consistent with normal ISMdust to changes in mass accretion rates or dark/bright spots. Dip-per light-curves consistent with changes in accretion rates or spotsare rare, there are virtually no burster objects that are consistentwith occultations or eclipses. Burster light-curves also show by farthe highest variability (of the order of 1.1 mag in V), followed bydippers and eclipsing objects (0.7 mag), and the symmetric light-curves have the lowest variations (0.5 mag).
We used a hierarchical clustering algorithm to identify groupsof YSOs with similar light-curve properties. This clustering algo-rithm allows us to identify the most unusual objects in our sample.We further find that clustering results in groups of YSOs that corre-spond to dippers, bursters or symmetric light-curves and they alsohave different α-values. Thus, grouping variable YSOs via hierar-chical clustering using their light-curve properties is a promisingapproach for future studies of larger samples of YSOs that will be-come available e.g. from GAIA or the LSST.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
J. Campbell-White acknowledges the studentship provided by theUniversity of Kent. S.V. Makin acknowledges an SFTC scholar-ship (1482158). KW acknowledges funding by STFC. K. Wiersemathanks Ray Mc Erlean and Dipali Thanki for technical sup-port of the UL50 operations. This research made use of Mon-tage. It is funded by the National Science Foundation underGrant Number ACI-1440620, and was previously funded bythe National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Earth Sci-ence Technology Office, Computation Technologies Project, un-der Cooperative Agreement Number NCC5-626 between NASAand the California Institute of Technology. We acknowledgeESA Gaia, DPAC and the Photometric Science Alerts Team(http://gsaweb.ast.cam.ac.uk/alerts).
REFERENCES
Ansdell M., Gaidos E., Rappaport S. A., Jacobs T. L., LaCourse D. M., JekK. J., Mann A. W., Wyatt M. C., Kennedy G., Williams J. P., BoyajianT. S., 2016, ApJ, 816, 69
Arkharov A. A., Lorenzetti D., Giannini T., Antoniucci S., Di Paola A.,Vitali F., Larionov V. M., 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7436
Aspin C., 2011, AJ, 141, 196Audard M., Ábrahám P., Dunham M. M., Green J. D., Grosso N., Ham-
aguchi K., Kastner J. H., Kóspál Á., Lodato G., Romanova M. M.,Skinner S. L., Vorobyov E. I., Zhu Z., 2014, Protostars and Planets VI,pp 387–410
Bacher A., Kimeswenger S., Teutsch P., 2005, MNRAS, 362, 542Bally J., Walawender J., Johnstone D., Kirk H., Goodman A., 2008, The
Perseus Cloud. p. 308Balog Z., Muzerolle J., Rieke G. H., Su K. Y. L., Young E. T., Megeath
S. T., 2007, ApJ, 660, 1532Berry R., Burnell J., 2005, The handbook of astronomical image processingBertin E., Arnouts S., 1996, A&AS, 117, 393Bouvier J., Matt S. P., Mohanty S., Scholz A., Stassun K. G., Zanni C.,
2014, Protostars and Planets VI, pp 433–450Bozhinova I., Scholz A., Costigan G., Lux O., Davis C. J., Ray T., Board-
man N. F., Hay K. L., Hewlett T., Hodosán G., Morton B., 2016, MN-RAS, 463, 4459
Carpenter J. M., Hillenbrand L. A., Skrutskie M. F., 2001, AJ, 121, 3160Cody A. M., Stauffer J., Baglin A., Micela G., Rebull L. M., Flaccomio E.,
et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 82
Contreras M. E., Sicilia-Aguilar A., Muzerolle J., Calvet N., Berlind P.,Hartmann L., 2002, AJ, 124, 1585
Covey K. R., Hillenbrand L. A., Miller A. A., Poznanski D., Cenko S. B.,Silverman J. M., Bloom J. S., Kasliwal M. M., Fischer W., et al. 2011,AJ, 141, 40
Cutri R. M., et al. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2328Dahm S. E., 2008, The Young Cluster and Star Forming Region NGC 2264.
p. 966Dahm S. E., Hillenbrand L. A., 2015, AJ, 149, 200Dahm S. E., Simon T., 2005, AJ, 129, 829Ferreira L., Hitchcock D. B., 2009, Communications in Statistics-
Simulation and Computation, 38, 1925Froebrich D., Campbell-White J., Zegmott T., Billington S. J., Makin S. V.,
Donohoe J., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10259Giannini T., Munari U., Antoniucci S., Lorenzetti D., Arkharov A. A., Dal-
laporta S., Rossi A., Traven G., 2017, ArXiv e-printsGrankin K. N., Melnikov S. Y., Bouvier J., Herbst W., Shevchenko V. S.,
2007, A&A, 461, 183Guieu S., Rebull L. M., Stauffer J. R., Hillenbrand L. A., Carpenter J. M.,
Noriega-Crespo A., Padgett D. L., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 787Harvey P. M., Huard T. L., Jørgensen J. K., Gutermuth R. A., Mamajek
E. E., Bourke T. L., Merín B., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 495Herbst W., Eislöffel J., Mundt R., Scholz A., 2007, Protostars and Planets
V, pp 297–311Hillenbrand L. A., Miller A. A., Covey K. R., Carpenter J. M., Cenko S. B.,
Silverman J. M., Muirhead P. S., et al. 2013, AJ, 145, 59Hogg D. W., Blanton M., Lang D., Mierle K., Roweis S., 2008, in Argyle
R. W., Bunclark P. S., Lewis J. R., eds, Astronomical Data AnalysisSoftware and Systems XVII Vol. 394 of Astronomical Society of thePacific Conference Series, Automated Astrometry (Invited). p. 27
Ibryamov S., Semkov E., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10170Ibryamov S., Semkov E., Peneva S., 2014, Research in Astronomy and As-
trophysics, 14, 1264Joy A. H., 1945, ApJ, 102, 168Koenig X. P., Leisawitz D. T., 2014, ApJ, 791, 131Kóspál Á., Ábrahám P., Acosta-Pulido J. A., Arévalo Morales M. J., Balog
Z., Carnerero M. I., Szegedi-Elek E., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A62Kóspál Á., Ábrahám P., Acosta-Pulido J. A., Arévalo Morales M. J.,
Carnerero M. I., Elek E., Kelemen J., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A133Kun M., Szegedi-Elek E., Moór A., Ábrahám P., Acosta-Pulido J. A., Apai
D., Kelemen J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L8Luhman K. L., Esplin T. L., Loutrel N. P., 2016, ApJ, 827, 52Magakian T. Y., Movsesian T. A., Hovhannesian E. R., 1999, Astrophysics,
42, 121Majaess D., 2013, Ap&SS, 344, 175Mathis J. S., 1990, ARA&A, 28, 37McGinnis P. T., Alencar S. H. P., Guimarães M. M., Sousa A. P., Stauffer
J., Bouvier J., Rebull L., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A11Miranda L. F., Eiroa C., Fernandez M., Gomez de Castro A. I., 1994, A&A,
281, 864Moffat A. F. J., 1969, A&A, 3, 455Munari U., Traven G., Dallaporta S., Lorenzetti D., Giannini T., Antoniucci
S., 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 10183Murtagh F., Legendre P., 2014, Journal of Classification, 31, 274Nakano M., Sugitani K., Watanabe M., Fukuda N., Ishihara D., Ueno M.,
2012, AJ, 143, 61Rebull L. M., Guieu S., Stauffer J. R., Hillenbrand L. A., Noriega-Crespo
A., Stapelfeldt K. R., Carey S. J., et al. 2011, ApJS, 193, 25Reipurth B., Schneider N., 2008, Star Formation and Young Clusters in
Cygnus. p. 36Román-Zúñiga C. G., Lada E. A., 2008, Star Formation in the Rosette Com-
plex. p. 928Scholz A., Froebrich D., Wood K., 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2910Scholz A., Geers V., Clark P., Jayawardhana R., Muzic K., 2013, ApJ, 775,
138Semkov E. H., Ibryamov S. I., Peneva S. P., 2017, Bulgarian Astronomical
Journal, 27, 75Sicilia-Aguilar A., Hartmann L. W., Hernández J., Briceño C., Calvet N.,
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 13
2005, AJ, 130, 188Skrutskie M. F., Cutri R. M., Stiening R., Weinberg M. D., Schneider S.,
Carpenter J. M., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163Stauffer J., Cody A. M., Baglin A., Alencar S., Rebull L., Hillenbrand L. A.,
Venuti L., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 83Stauffer J., Cody A. M., Rebull L., Hillenbrand L. A., Turner N. J., Carpen-
ter J., Carey S., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 60Stelzer B., Scholz A., 2009, A&A, 507, 227Stetson P. B., 1996, PASP, 108, 851Straižys V., Maskoliunas M., Boyle R. P., Prada Moroni P. G., Tognelli E.,
Zdanavicius K., Zdanavicius J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1848
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 15
Tabl
eA
1:T
his
tabl
elis
tsth
ein
divi
dual
prop
ertie
sof
alls
tars
inve
stig
ated
inth
epa
pers
.We
listt
heca
talo
gue
nam
eof
the
sour
ce,t
hena
me
ofth
ecl
uste
r/re
gion
itis
in,t
heR
ight
Asc
entio
nan
dD
eclin
atio
n(J
2000
),th
enu
mbe
rofp
oint
sin
the
light
curv
eus
edto
dete
rmin
eth
esl
ope
αin
the
Vvs
V-I
diag
ram
,the
slop
eα
ofa
linea
rfit
inth
eV
vsV
-I;t
herm
sof
the
data
poin
tsfr
omth
efit
,the
Asy
mm
etry
inde
xM
,the
Stet
son
inde
xS
,the
grou
pin
the
dend
rogr
amth
eso
urce
isas
soci
ated
with
,the
rang
eof
mag
nitu
des
and
therm
sof
the
V,R
and
I-B
and
light
curv
e.
Sour
ceN
ame
Reg
ion
RA
DE
CN
var
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
0328
1101
+31
1729
2N
GC
1333
52.0
4591
731
.291
4719
44.0
0.01
3-0
.24
1.72
60.
800.
190.
140.
040.
050.
022M
ASS
_J03
2836
92+
3117
353
NG
C13
3352
.153
833
31.2
9317
1845
.40.
047
0.04
2.09
60.
960.
240.
310.
080.
240.
062M
ASS
_J03
2836
92+
3117
353
NG
C13
3352
.153
833
31.2
9317
1946
.00.
046
0.28
1.66
50.
600.
180.
320.
070.
240.
062M
ASS
_J03
2851
01+
3118
184
NG
C13
3352
.212
542
31.3
0514
2372
.10.
101
0.90
2.33
11.
210.
261.
060.
231.
280.
262M
ASS
_J03
2852
16+
3122
453
NG
C13
3352
.217
333
31.3
7925
2471
.30.
048
0.91
2.37
10.
790.
220.
730.
200.
570.
162M
ASS
_J03
2857
41+
3119
505
NG
C13
3352
.239
208
31.3
3072
1746
.60.
021
0.87
1.02
30.
710.
150.
230.
060.
130.
032M
ASS
_J03
2859
54+
3121
467
NG
C13
3352
.248
125
31.3
6300
2378
.50.
107
-0.0
66.
626
3.09
0.75
2.74
0.66
2.49
0.62
2MA
SS_J
0329
0386
+31
2148
7N
GC
1333
52.2
6608
331
.363
5325
50.7
0.08
50.
391.
233
0.55
0.14
0.53
0.15
0.44
0.12
2MA
SS_J
0329
1037
+31
2159
1N
GC
1333
52.2
9325
031
.366
4425
58.7
0.13
90.
324.
283
1.41
0.42
0.99
0.30
1.04
0.28
2MA
SS_J
0329
2187
+31
1536
3N
GC
1333
52.3
4112
531
.260
0823
77.1
0.06
20.
417.
482
3.34
0.84
2.72
0.66
2.86
0.68
2MA
SS_J
0329
2204
+31
2415
3N
GC
1333
52.3
4183
331
.404
2824
51.2
0.14
9-0
.07
6.41
62.
660.
711.
790.
520.
950.
232M
ASS
_J03
2925
91+
3126
401
NG
C13
3352
.358
000
31.4
4447
24-8
9.9
0.04
10.
502.
637
1.33
0.30
1.40
0.32
1.39
0.31
2MA
SS_J
0329
2889
+30
5841
8N
GC
1333
52.3
7037
530
.978
2820
51.7
0.08
9-0
.15
1.63
60.
660.
170.
400.
110.
390.
122M
ASS
_J03
2929
25+
3118
347
NG
C13
3352
.371
917
31.3
0967
1945
.80.
025
0.48
1.12
30.
610.
140.
140.
050.
120.
032M
ASS
_J03
2945
92+
3104
406N
NG
C13
3352
.441
208
31.0
7811
1648
.90.
018
-0.5
31.
066
0.50
0.13
0.19
0.05
0.10
0.03
2MA
SS_J
0329
4592
+31
0440
6SN
GC
1333
52.4
4175
031
.077
5019
49.1
0.02
2-0
.55
1.31
60.
500.
130.
220.
060.
120.
032M
ASS
_J03
2954
03+
3120
529
NG
C13
3352
.475
125
31.3
4806
2356
.40.
049
0.03
2.37
50.
800.
210.
540.
160.
270.
08V
aria
ble_
R_5
2.55
7724
_31.
2804
81N
GC
1333
52.5
5772
131
.280
4824
83.1
0.03
71.
361.
071
0.59
0.14
0.45
0.13
0.48
0.13
Var
iabl
e_R
_52.
6478
58_3
1.26
6247
NG
C13
3352
.647
854
31.2
6624
1779
.70.
090
0.35
2.66
20.
960.
270.
930.
210.
810.
24C
l_N
GC
_712
9_E
GM
_8N
GC
7129
325.
6350
0066
.083
0841
35.7
0.10
00.
321.
713
0.73
0.18
0.49
0.12
0.48
0.11
SS20
09_N
GC
_712
9−S3−
X41
NG
C71
2932
5.66
2125
66.1
1908
7648
.10.
101
-0.0
45.
226
2.15
0.54
3.41
0.70
0.89
0.15
2MA
SS_J
2142
4023
+66
1328
7N
GC
7129
325.
6676
2566
.224
6418
69.4
0.18
2-0
.19
3.02
61.
020.
291.
100.
311.
250.
332M
ASS
_J21
4246
08+
6605
562
NG
C71
2932
5.69
2000
66.0
9894
2943
.70.
064
-0.1
52.
086
1.59
0.29
0.92
0.17
0.60
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2142
4613
+66
1346
0N
GC
7129
325.
6921
6766
.229
3922
43.3
0.07
10.
121.
705
0.59
0.17
0.47
0.13
0.34
0.08
2MA
SS_J
2142
4687
+66
0657
4N
GC
7129
325.
6952
9266
.115
9426
47.9
0.36
70.
4310
.94
44.
441.
214.
261.
152.
270.
512M
ASS
_J21
4247
05+
6604
578
NG
C71
2932
5.69
6042
66.0
8272
108
56.3
0.05
40.
091.
435
1.01
0.16
0.72
0.11
0.58
0.09
2MA
SS_J
2142
4790
+66
0653
0N
GC
7129
325.
6995
8366
.114
7263
42.3
0.34
20.
0112
.11
44.
081.
222.
820.
891.
760.
432M
ASS
_J21
4250
92+
6606
036
NG
C71
2932
5.71
2167
66.1
0100
6844
.20.
218
-0.6
85.
944
4.10
0.72
4.16
0.60
1.31
0.28
2MA
SS_J
2142
5234
+66
0535
0N
GC
7129
325.
7179
1766
.093
1439
44.9
0.34
3-0
.43
12.9
24
3.99
1.28
4.65
1.39
1.87
0.44
MM
N20
04b_
_6N
GC
7129
325.
7192
0866
.115
8940
34.6
0.96
40.
2511
.56
75.
371.
273.
010.
743.
241.
052M
ASS
_J21
4253
21+
6607
207
NG
C71
2932
5.72
1708
66.1
2244
6716
.62.
392
0.86
8.86
74.
130.
982.
730.
554.
881.
42M
MN
2004
b__9
NG
C71
2932
5.72
2875
66.1
3481
8847
.90.
128
-0.6
54.
514
3.55
0.51
2.58
0.56
0.95
0.19
MM
N20
04b_
11N
GC
7129
325.
7343
7566
.100
5898
45.1
0.09
20.
203.
715
2.51
0.41
0.95
0.17
0.72
0.12
2MA
SS_J
2142
5719
+66
0634
6N
GC
7129
325.
7381
2566
.109
6910
048
.70.
178
-0.5
85.
894
3.83
0.70
2.25
0.44
1.37
0.26
2MA
SS_J
2142
5836
+66
0527
3N
GC
7129
325.
7431
6766
.090
9231
23.1
0.63
60.
794.
587
1.98
0.50
1.50
0.44
2.33
0.55
SS20
09_N
GC
_712
9−S3−
X17
NG
C71
2932
5.74
4875
66.1
1022
6643
.40.
390
-0.5
78.
724
4.18
0.97
3.01
0.57
2.36
0.48
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
16 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
HB
C_7
31N
GC
7129
325.
7483
7566
.076
0629
48.0
0.11
5-0
.50
3.93
62.
090.
453.
060.
800.
740.
162M
ASS
_J21
4259
97+
6601
010
NG
C71
2932
5.74
9875
66.0
1694
1842
.70.
062
-0.3
51.
576
0.62
0.16
0.34
0.09
0.36
0.08
HB
C_7
32N
GC
7129
325.
7500
0066
.191
0893
67.4
0.06
50.
884.
213
2.43
0.54
2.25
0.49
2.13
0.45
2MA
SS_J
2143
0188
+66
0644
7N
GC
7129
325.
7578
3366
.112
4295
50.8
0.26
7-0
.65
4.92
43.
520.
612.
910.
511.
920.
362M
ASS
_J21
4303
43+
6605
264
NG
C71
2932
5.76
4292
66.0
9067
8347
.70.
636
0.92
10.6
07
4.33
1.14
2.79
0.58
3.11
0.76
EM
_LkH
A__
234
NG
C71
2932
5.77
8417
66.1
1506
6963
.10.
052
0.76
1.23
30.
900.
170.
840.
140.
690.
132M
ASS
_J21
4311
41+
6612
555
NG
C71
2932
5.79
7542
66.2
1542
6252
.00.
073
0.07
2.17
51.
060.
230.
790.
160.
620.
12M
MN
2004
b_19
NG
C71
2932
5.82
0125
66.0
9683
5643
.70.
069
0.28
2.01
51.
070.
210.
690.
120.
420.
09M
MN
2004
b_20
NG
C71
2932
5.88
2583
66.1
4739
6450
.70.
077
0.57
2.20
30.
920.
211.
050.
150.
930.
14M
MN
2004
b_22
NG
C71
2932
5.93
1000
66.1
2522
5744
.90.
051
0.14
1.53
50.
780.
170.
440.
100.
260.
062M
ASS
_J21
4406
34+
6604
231
NG
C71
2932
6.02
6417
66.0
7308
2972
.10.
104
-0.2
84.
356
1.56
0.42
1.22
0.37
1.02
0.32
Var
iabl
e_V
_325
.765
320_
65.9
1445
2N
GC
7129
325.
7652
9265
.914
4487
49.2
0.06
9-0
.40
1.33
60.
800.
150.
450.
100.
470.
10V
aria
ble_
V_3
26.0
9289
6_65
.714
478
NG
C71
2932
6.09
2875
65.7
1447
7525
.70.
146
-0.3
11.
014
2.55
0.25
0.39
0.07
0.62
0.12
Var
iabl
e_R
_325
.348
419_
65.9
2715
5N
GC
7129
325.
3484
1765
.927
1411
565
.70.
036
0.29
3.46
31.
520.
361.
280.
300.
830.
20V
aria
ble_
R_3
26.3
9141
8_66
.144
142
NG
C71
2932
6.39
1417
66.1
4414
9964
.70.
049
-0.0
51.
755
0.82
0.17
0.64
0.14
0.48
0.11
Var
iabl
e_R
_325
.269
501_
65.9
1642
0N
GC
7129
325.
2695
0065
.916
4272
43.8
0.10
1-0
.19
1.65
60.
780.
180.
710.
150.
750.
13V
aria
ble_
R_3
24.8
6529
5_65
.864
845
NG
C71
2932
4.86
5292
65.8
6483
6238
.10.
132
-0.3
51.
396
0.93
0.16
0.85
0.19
0.82
0.16
Var
iabl
e_I_
325.
3879
39_6
6.37
2276
NG
C71
2932
5.38
7917
66.3
7225
101
74.1
0.02
60.
572.
303
1.22
0.25
1.01
0.21
0.84
0.17
Var
iabl
e_I_
325.
0593
57_6
6.45
7283
NG
C71
2932
5.05
9333
66.4
5728
9866
.00.
059
0.72
1.92
31.
360.
211.
230.
181.
110.
172M
ASS
_J21
3517
45+
5748
223
IC13
96A
323.
8227
0857
.806
1917
44.9
0.04
6-0
.10
1.23
60.
500.
140.
340.
080.
220.
062M
ASS
_J21
3518
61+
5734
092
IC13
96A
323.
8275
4257
.569
2222
65.5
0.03
50.
561.
343
0.60
0.15
0.39
0.12
0.36
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2135
3021
+57
3116
4IC
1396
A32
3.87
5875
57.5
2122
2346
.90.
052
0.01
1.32
50.
500.
140.
290.
090.
260.
072M
ASS
_J21
3649
41+
5731
220
IC13
96A
324.
2058
7557
.522
7826
52.7
0.06
7-0
.39
1.69
60.
620.
171.
100.
330.
350.
092M
ASS
_J21
3655
79+
5736
533
IC13
96A
324.
2324
5857
.614
8119
46.1
0.04
50.
511.
113
0.43
0.13
0.17
0.05
0.26
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2136
5767
+57
2733
1IC
1396
A32
4.24
0292
57.4
5919
2372
.50.
062
-0.2
83.
256
1.51
0.34
1.15
0.30
0.91
0.23
2MA
SS_J
2137
0088
+57
2522
4IC
1396
A32
4.25
3667
57.4
2289
1950
.80.
092
0.50
1.70
30.
770.
170.
640.
150.
770.
152M
ASS
_J21
3710
31+
5730
189
IC13
96A
324.
2929
5857
.505
2516
51.0
0.04
9-0
.63
1.07
40.
430.
120.
400.
110.
240.
062M
ASS
_J21
3710
54+
5731
124
IC13
96A
324.
2939
1757
.520
1125
56.6
0.06
70.
271.
245
0.46
0.13
0.31
0.09
0.41
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2137
1183
+57
2448
6IC
1396
A32
4.29
9292
57.4
1350
2052
.70.
048
0.09
1.05
50.
460.
120.
290.
080.
260.
072M
ASS
_J21
3712
15+
5727
262
IC13
96A
324.
3006
2557
.457
2819
62.0
0.05
81.
081.
401
0.63
0.17
0.40
0.10
0.42
0.11
2MA
SS_J
2137
1591
+57
2659
1IC
1396
A32
4.31
6292
57.4
4975
2566
.40.
045
1.12
2.44
11.
420.
331.
070.
250.
960.
212M
ASS
_J21
3734
20+
5726
154
IC13
96A
324.
3925
0057
.437
6118
46.8
0.06
00.
621.
333
0.47
0.13
0.24
0.07
0.35
0.09
2MA
SS_J
2137
4486
+57
2413
5IC
1396
A32
4.43
6917
57.4
0375
2271
.40.
071
0.20
2.04
20.
700.
190.
560.
170.
580.
152M
ASS
_J21
3745
14+
5719
423
IC13
96A
324.
4380
8357
.328
4219
62.0
0.08
6-0
.33
2.07
60.
820.
210.
600.
180.
700.
172M
ASS
_J21
3750
18+
5733
404
IC13
96A
324.
4590
8357
.561
2223
69.3
0.05
00.
471.
533
0.63
0.15
0.48
0.13
0.46
0.11
2MA
SS_J
2137
5022
+57
2548
7IC
1396
A32
4.45
9250
57.4
3019
2354
.00.
074
-0.1
71.
236
0.55
0.14
0.47
0.11
0.42
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2137
5107
+57
2750
2IC
1396
A32
4.46
2792
57.4
6394
2052
.50.
065
0.50
1.08
30.
690.
140.
390.
100.
420.
102M
ASS
_J21
3758
12+
5731
199
IC13
96A
324.
4921
6757
.522
1924
62.6
0.03
9-0
.21
2.04
60.
570.
180.
390.
140.
290.
102M
ASS
_J21
3758
41+
5718
046
IC13
96A
324.
4933
7557
.301
2819
48.8
0.08
80.
311.
225
0.64
0.14
0.57
0.12
0.51
0.13
2MA
SS_J
2138
0350
+57
4134
9IC
1396
A32
4.51
4583
57.6
9303
2578
.20.
045
0.50
3.77
21.
520.
391.
270.
341.
180.
302M
ASS
_J21
3817
31+
5731
220
IC13
96A
324.
5721
2557
.522
7824
69.5
0.02
90.
332.
902
1.14
0.28
0.92
0.23
0.77
0.19
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 17
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
2138
1749
+57
4101
9IC
1396
A32
4.57
2875
57.6
8386
1650
.90.
087
-0.1
81.
676
0.72
0.18
0.48
0.12
0.51
0.12
2MA
SS_J
2138
2596
+57
3409
3IC
1396
A32
4.60
8167
57.5
6925
2272
.10.
038
0.49
2.16
30.
650.
190.
640.
180.
530.
152M
ASS
_J21
3827
42+
5731
081
IC13
96A
324.
6142
5057
.518
9221
60.9
0.09
5-0
.05
1.56
50.
450.
140.
540.
160.
560.
172M
ASS
_J21
3827
43+
5727
207
IC13
96A
324.
6142
9257
.455
7523
58.5
0.10
10.
792.
553
0.91
0.27
0.87
0.21
0.63
0.17
2MA
SS_J
2138
4038
+57
3837
4IC
1396
A32
4.66
8250
57.6
4372
2350
.30.
061
0.52
1.26
30.
690.
150.
300.
080.
360.
092M
ASS
_J21
3844
46+
5718
091
IC13
96A
324.
6852
5057
.302
5324
63.5
0.07
80.
501.
563
0.83
0.18
0.78
0.18
0.78
0.16
2MA
SS_J
2138
4544
+57
2823
0IC
1396
A32
4.68
9333
57.4
7306
1947
.40.
039
-0.6
31.
836
1.12
0.23
0.25
0.06
0.22
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2138
5542
+57
3529
9IC
1396
A32
4.73
0917
57.5
9164
2557
.90.
040
0.29
1.36
50.
560.
130.
470.
110.
280.
082M
ASS
_J21
3903
46+
5730
527
IC13
96A
324.
7644
1757
.514
6420
36.2
0.14
5-0
.11
2.33
60.
870.
240.
650.
160.
750.
182M
ASS
_J21
3903
90+
5731
037
IC13
96A
324.
7662
5057
.517
6919
54.7
0.11
00.
111.
965
0.65
0.19
0.58
0.18
0.73
0.18
2MA
SS_J
2139
1213
+57
3616
4IC
1396
A32
4.80
0542
57.6
0456
2567
.50.
029
0.60
2.06
31.
000.
230.
800.
180.
660.
152M
ASS
_J21
3914
24+
5722
129
IC13
96A
324.
8093
3357
.370
2521
57.9
0.05
20.
791.
033
0.66
0.14
0.35
0.10
0.31
0.07
2MA
SS_J
2139
2957
+57
3341
7IC
1396
A32
4.87
3208
57.5
6158
2467
.50.
043
0.50
1.56
30.
450.
140.
400.
120.
300.
092M
ASS
_J21
3934
80+
5723
277
IC13
96A
324.
8950
0057
.391
0316
72.5
0.08
80.
464.
612
1.59
0.46
1.15
0.34
1.17
0.34
2MA
SS_J
2139
3612
+57
3128
9IC
1396
A32
4.90
0500
57.5
2469
1659
.30.
064
-0.6
01.
686
0.84
0.21
0.57
0.15
0.67
0.14
2MA
SS_J
2139
4643
+57
0507
2IC
1396
A32
4.94
3458
57.0
8533
2335
.80.
095
0.54
1.26
30.
730.
150.
410.
090.
500.
112M
ASS
_J21
3958
61+
5728
404
IC13
96A
324.
9942
0857
.477
8917
56.9
0.06
70.
852.
723
1.11
0.29
0.53
0.12
0.50
0.14
2MA
SS_J
2140
0273
+57
3505
0IC
1396
A32
5.01
1375
57.5
8472
1853
.90.
055
0.21
1.97
50.
680.
180.
430.
120.
410.
102M
ASS
_J21
4011
82+
5740
121
IC13
96A
325.
0492
5057
.670
0319
48.3
0.09
20.
002.
186
0.87
0.23
0.86
0.18
0.53
0.13
2MA
SS_J
2140
2274
+57
4624
0IC
1396
A32
5.09
4750
57.7
7333
1954
.90.
193
0.21
1.97
51.
290.
251.
390.
271.
950.
36V
aria
ble_
V_3
23.8
2998
7_57
.610
565
IC13
96A
323.
8299
5857
.610
5627
76.0
0.01
50.
972.
301
1.09
0.26
0.92
0.23
0.81
0.20
Var
iabl
e_V
_324
.665
863_
57.1
4630
1IC
1396
A32
4.66
5833
57.1
4628
27-5
9.2
0.03
5-0
.74
1.36
70.
430.
140.
540.
170.
600.
22V
aria
ble_
V_3
24.9
2038
0_57
.615
208
IC13
96A
324.
9203
7557
.615
1922
78.8
0.07
00.
051.
332
0.47
0.13
0.50
0.14
0.69
0.16
Var
iabl
e_V
_324
.962
250_
57.6
0466
4IC
1396
A32
4.96
2250
57.6
0464
2449
.20.
051
0.24
1.49
50.
640.
160.
340.
100.
250.
07V
aria
ble_
V_3
23.4
2294
3_57
.563
210
IC13
96A
323.
4229
1757
.563
1919
45.9
0.14
00.
132.
165
0.92
0.22
0.73
0.20
0.84
0.19
Var
iabl
e_V
_324
.702
820_
57.5
0326
2IC
1396
A32
4.70
2792
57.5
0325
1744
.80.
091
-0.6
33.
514
1.56
0.39
0.80
0.20
0.49
0.12
Var
iabl
e_V
_324
.572
449_
57.7
6504
9IC
1396
A32
4.57
2417
57.7
6503
1876
.00.
147
-0.0
42.
182
0.74
0.22
0.92
0.23
1.01
0.27
Var
iabl
e_R
_324
.174
927_
57.1
8004
6IC
1396
A32
4.17
4917
57.1
8003
2559
.70.
017
-0.2
71.
606
0.75
0.18
0.52
0.11
0.32
0.07
Var
iabl
e_R
_324
.676
453_
57.5
0771
7IC
1396
A32
4.67
6417
57.5
0769
2367
.90.
078
-0.8
27.
044
2.47
0.75
1.70
0.54
1.48
0.46
Var
iabl
e_R
_324
.920
410_
57.6
1520
8IC
1396
A32
4.92
0375
57.6
1519
2278
.80.
070
0.05
1.33
20.
470.
130.
500.
140.
690.
16V
aria
ble_
R_3
23.5
3561
4_57
.405
205
IC13
96A
323.
5355
8357
.405
1922
67.8
0.05
70.
341.
133
0.40
0.12
0.42
0.12
0.44
0.11
Var
iabl
e_I_
324.
5491
33_5
7.35
3069
IC13
96A
324.
5491
2557
.353
0625
84.5
0.03
60.
782.
241
0.75
0.22
0.75
0.21
0.75
0.20
Var
iabl
e_I_
324.
8540
65_5
7.75
7702
IC13
96A
324.
8540
4257
.757
6916
28.5
0.16
8-0
.22
1.02
40.
420.
120.
550.
160.
560.
15V
aria
ble_
I_32
4.87
3871
_57.
7578
66IC
1396
A32
4.87
3833
57.7
5786
1836
.50.
082
0.39
1.10
30.
460.
120.
200.
060.
390.
092M
ASS
_J03
4328
20+
3201
591
IC34
855
.867
583
32.0
3311
2559
.20.
072
-0.3
32.
496
1.06
0.24
0.87
0.19
0.70
0.15
2MA
SS_J
0343
4939
+32
1039
8IC
348
55.9
5579
232
.177
7819
51.7
0.03
2-0
.11
1.07
60.
370.
110.
250.
070.
260.
062M
ASS
_J03
4358
56+
3217
275
IC34
855
.993
958
32.2
9103
2148
.10.
031
-0.0
52.
026
0.77
0.19
0.85
0.17
0.21
0.05
2MA
SS_J
0343
5890
+32
1127
0IC
348
55.9
9545
832
.190
8622
59.7
0.07
30.
172.
425
0.94
0.25
0.65
0.16
0.54
0.13
2MA
SS_J
0344
0410
+32
0717
0IC
348
56.0
1712
532
.121
4219
44.2
0.03
20.
151.
705
0.65
0.18
0.39
0.10
0.18
0.04
2MA
SS_J
0344
1143
+32
1940
1IC
348
56.0
4766
732
.327
8121
48.8
0.04
4-0
.83
2.96
42.
780.
501.
100.
180.
480.
092M
ASS
_J03
4421
29+
3211
563
IC34
856
.088
708
32.1
9900
1747
.40.
033
-0.7
31.
694
0.87
0.20
0.44
0.11
0.15
0.04
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
18 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
0344
2155
+32
1017
4IC
348
56.0
8983
332
.171
5019
49.4
0.04
4-0
.33
1.85
60.
880.
210.
490.
130.
250.
062M
ASS
_J03
4421
91+
3212
115
IC34
856
.091
292
32.2
0322
1746
.50.
028
-0.5
21.
996
0.88
0.24
0.24
0.07
0.24
0.05
2MA
SS_J
0344
2228
+32
0542
7IC
348
56.0
9287
532
.095
1918
54.5
0.17
80.
032.
385
0.92
0.25
0.86
0.23
0.95
0.26
2MA
SS_J
0344
2232
+32
1200
7IC
348
56.0
9300
032
.200
2221
49.8
0.03
80.
501.
833
0.67
0.18
0.32
0.10
0.22
0.06
2MA
SS_J
0344
2257
+32
0153
6IC
348
56.0
9404
232
.031
5820
46.6
0.02
40.
691.
113
0.61
0.13
0.20
0.04
0.13
0.03
2MA
SS_J
0344
2557
+32
1229
9IC
348
56.1
0654
232
.208
3326
67.6
0.03
8-0
.26
1.43
60.
520.
140.
480.
130.
370.
102M
ASS
_J03
4428
12+
3216
002
IC34
856
.117
167
32.2
6675
2247
.80.
122
-1.2
65.
524
5.03
0.97
0.72
0.16
1.36
0.24
2MA
SS_J
0344
2972
+32
1039
8IC
348
56.1
2383
332
.177
7221
46.5
0.15
20.
3111
.51
33.
111.
122.
260.
801.
080.
282M
ASS
_J03
4432
57+
3208
558
IC34
856
.135
750
32.1
4883
1846
.60.
097
-0.1
510
.12
63.
451.
071.
270.
350.
880.
182M
ASS
_J03
4432
76+
3209
157
IC34
856
.136
542
32.1
5439
1945
.90.
546
0.63
10.1
97
3.79
1.07
2.90
0.62
1.63
0.60
2MA
SS_J
0344
3398
+32
0854
1IC
348
56.1
4158
332
.148
3624
49.7
0.09
8-0
.05
8.06
62.
600.
781.
210.
300.
630.
162M
ASS
_J03
4434
26+
3210
497
IC34
856
.142
792
32.1
8047
1751
.20.
171
-0.6
811
.54
44.
541.
392.
741.
010.
990.
322M
ASS
_J03
4435
88+
3215
533
IC34
856
.149
542
32.2
6483
1745
.80.
019
0.55
1.14
30.
400.
120.
430.
090.
090.
022M
ASS
_J03
4437
19+
3209
161
IC34
856
.154
958
32.1
5447
2541
.70.
650
1.05
8.00
73.
090.
882.
350.
582.
360.
682M
ASS
_J03
4437
41+
3209
009
IC34
856
.155
875
32.1
5025
2253
.60.
332
0.61
7.72
43.
400.
891.
990.
522.
530.
552M
ASS
_J03
4437
88+
3208
041
IC34
856
.157
875
32.1
3450
2348
.40.
075
-0.5
63.
026
1.25
0.32
0.81
0.18
0.60
0.12
2MA
SS_J
0344
3798
+32
0329
6IC
348
56.1
5829
232
.058
2825
77.2
0.06
50.
464.
102
1.45
0.40
1.36
0.37
1.30
0.33
2MA
SS_J
0344
3838
+32
1259
7IC
348
56.1
5995
832
.216
6124
49.4
0.03
10.
171.
075
0.47
0.12
0.22
0.05
0.19
0.04
2MA
SS_J
0344
3845
+32
0735
6IC
348
56.1
6029
232
.126
5825
68.5
0.03
70.
581.
133
0.74
0.15
0.37
0.10
0.27
0.07
2MA
SS_J
0344
3854
+32
0800
6IC
348
56.1
6062
532
.133
5323
44.4
0.07
00.
271.
635
0.82
0.19
0.71
0.14
0.54
0.11
2MA
SS_J
0344
3869
+32
0856
7IC
348
56.1
6125
032
.149
0821
46.2
0.10
40.
087.
786
2.77
0.82
1.56
0.37
0.76
0.16
2MA
SS_J
0344
3871
+32
0842
0IC
348
56.1
6133
332
.145
0023
46.3
0.06
20.
0311
.57
63.
161.
131.
610.
510.
380.
092M
ASS
_J03
4439
16+
3209
182
IC34
856
.163
250
32.1
5511
2645
.80.
025
-0.8
44.
914
1.75
0.46
0.49
0.11
0.14
0.03
2MA
SS_J
0344
3924
+32
0735
5IC
348
56.1
6354
232
.126
5322
72.3
0.03
50.
241.
582
0.53
0.14
0.47
0.13
0.49
0.12
2MA
SS_J
0344
4472
+32
0402
4IC
348
56.1
8633
332
.067
4223
57.5
0.02
5-0
.45
1.32
60.
740.
160.
440.
110.
250.
062M
ASS
_J03
4448
81+
3213
218
IC34
856
.203
458
32.2
2281
1742
.10.
043
-0.5
81.
064
0.51
0.13
0.27
0.07
0.32
0.07
2MA
SS_J
0344
5096
+32
1609
3IC
348
56.2
1237
532
.269
3320
50.2
0.02
90.
301.
145
0.73
0.15
0.24
0.07
0.16
0.05
2MA
SS_J
0345
1634
+32
0619
9IC
348
56.3
1812
532
.105
5324
60.8
0.05
20.
552.
733
1.26
0.32
0.78
0.21
0.63
0.17
2MA
SS_J
0345
2514
+32
0930
1IC
348
56.3
5479
232
.158
3917
49.9
0.02
2-0
.42
2.59
60.
760.
250.
390.
120.
220.
05V
aria
ble_
V_5
5.79
6165
_32.
2962
07IC
348
55.7
9616
332
.296
2123
64.3
0.02
0-0
.21
1.36
60.
540.
140.
370.
100.
240.
072M
ASS
_J20
4821
50+
4441
150
IC50
7031
2.08
9538
44.6
8749
3047
.50.
063
0.23
2.51
51.
240.
270.
390.
100.
370.
082M
ASS
_J20
4828
80+
4424
115
IC50
7031
2.11
9996
44.4
0321
7548
.40.
036
0.20
1.02
50.
450.
110.
300.
060.
340.
052M
ASS
_J20
4835
46+
4353
133
IC50
7031
2.14
7738
43.8
8702
7557
.50.
087
-0.0
42.
565
1.46
0.26
1.00
0.21
0.81
0.16
2MA
SS_J
2048
5169
+43
5101
4IC
5070
312.
2153
3343
.850
3819
43.9
0.11
7-0
.72
3.16
42.
600.
491.
230.
270.
730.
162M
ASS
_J20
4911
76+
4412
329
IC50
7031
2.29
9104
44.2
0916
1949
.00.
089
0.46
2.44
30.
970.
240.
690.
160.
550.
142M
ASS
_J20
4923
23+
4434
373
IC50
7031
2.34
6833
44.5
7699
2957
.80.
072
0.43
2.00
31.
140.
230.
640.
160.
480.
132M
ASS
_J20
4932
19+
4417
031
IC50
7031
2.38
4096
44.2
8423
4865
.30.
144
0.26
3.53
32.
180.
381.
780.
351.
240.
292M
ASS
_J20
5033
07+
4415
387
IC50
7031
2.63
7754
44.2
6075
3155
.70.
063
0.15
1.81
50.
750.
190.
610.
140.
390.
112M
ASS
_J20
5036
95+
4421
408
IC50
7031
2.65
3900
44.3
6134
5764
.50.
077
0.17
2.96
21.
450.
301.
090.
241.
210.
212M
ASS
_J20
5040
29+
4430
490
IC50
7031
2.66
7908
44.5
1362
8175
.50.
025
0.28
1.45
21.
220.
180.
950.
150.
770.
122M
ASS
_J20
5040
53+
4420
506
IC50
7031
2.66
8917
44.3
4744
3146
.50.
041
-0.3
61.
506
0.79
0.16
3.23
0.86
0.23
0.05
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 19
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
2050
4353
+44
1551
8IC
5070
312.
6813
3344
.264
3974
57.6
0.08
3-0
.77
2.05
41.
510.
251.
400.
290.
870.
162M
ASS
_J20
5046
08+
4419
100
IC50
7031
2.69
1954
44.3
1949
7048
.40.
045
0.29
1.10
50.
860.
140.
780.
160.
380.
072M
ASS
_J20
5048
80+
4419
233
IC50
7031
2.70
3371
44.3
2318
6348
.10.
041
0.34
1.40
50.
790.
151.
610.
280.
260.
062M
ASS
_J20
5050
39+
4450
115
IC50
7031
2.71
0054
44.8
3653
8175
.70.
047
-0.3
03.
756
1.76
0.41
1.71
0.36
1.49
0.31
2MA
SS_J
2050
5317
+44
2353
5IC
5070
312.
7215
5844
.398
2442
42.0
0.07
00.
261.
785
0.93
0.20
1.25
0.28
0.48
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2050
5357
+44
2100
8IC
5070
312.
7232
3744
.350
2069
79.9
0.03
31.
025.
031
1.94
0.51
1.44
0.39
1.47
0.40
2MA
SS_J
2050
5563
+44
1750
2IC
5070
312.
7318
1244
.297
2478
62.2
0.03
3-0
.08
1.06
50.
770.
130.
580.
100.
410.
082M
ASS
_J20
5058
70+
4417
308
IC50
7031
2.74
4567
44.2
9189
8369
.70.
037
0.23
1.45
20.
680.
150.
580.
130.
470.
112M
ASS
_J20
5059
01+
4419
542
IC50
7031
2.74
5850
44.3
3177
2042
.10.
073
0.11
1.62
50.
770.
180.
440.
110.
350.
092M
ASS
_J20
5059
48+
4419
390
IC50
7031
2.74
7896
44.3
2748
3053
.10.
120
0.11
1.55
50.
740.
170.
760.
190.
590.
162M
ASS
_J20
5059
74+
4440
491
IC50
7031
2.74
8900
44.6
8033
7248
.20.
037
-0.0
81.
046
0.71
0.13
0.29
0.06
0.19
0.05
2MA
SS_J
2051
0089
+44
3149
7IC
5070
312.
7537
8344
.530
5181
72.3
0.03
20.
772.
741
1.54
0.31
1.33
0.25
1.09
0.21
2MA
SS_J
2051
0222
+44
1352
1IC
5070
312.
7593
0844
.231
1246
50.4
0.02
60.
131.
325
0.59
0.14
0.28
0.07
0.15
0.04
2MA
SS_J
2051
0310
+44
2402
8IC
5070
312.
7628
1744
.400
7330
60.1
0.12
90.
334.
343
1.63
0.45
2.31
0.49
0.99
0.27
2MA
SS_J
2051
0333
+44
2415
5IC
5070
312.
7639
4644
.404
2875
56.1
0.06
20.
192.
115
1.20
0.23
1.19
0.20
0.80
0.12
2MA
SS_J
2051
0465
+44
2350
1IC
5070
312.
7693
7944
.397
2585
77.7
0.02
90.
332.
082
1.25
0.26
1.03
0.21
0.96
0.20
2MA
SS_J
2051
0570
+44
1632
2IC
5070
312.
7737
7544
.275
5580
74.8
0.03
60.
312.
902
1.37
0.31
1.15
0.26
1.04
0.23
2MA
SS_J
2051
0805
+44
3150
5IC
5070
312.
7836
0044
.530
6840
58.4
0.14
40.
032.
805
0.97
0.26
0.85
0.22
0.85
0.23
2MA
SS_J
2051
0950
+44
3329
6IC
5070
312.
7895
5044
.558
2339
47.2
0.02
3-0
.14
1.16
60.
510.
130.
300.
060.
140.
032M
ASS
_J20
5114
55+
4413
379
IC50
7031
2.81
0671
44.2
2716
3745
.80.
031
-0.0
61.
546
0.74
0.16
0.56
0.12
0.21
0.04
2MA
SS_J
2051
1513
+44
1817
6IC
5070
312.
8131
0844
.304
8572
62.1
0.04
20.
712.
263
1.80
0.26
1.52
0.21
1.15
0.16
2MA
SS_J
2051
1771
+44
1829
8IC
5070
312.
8238
2144
.308
2343
69.9
0.08
40.
144.
352
1.51
0.42
1.34
0.36
1.08
0.29
2MA
SS_J
2051
1824
+44
1308
2IC
5070
312.
8259
2944
.218
9981
67.6
0.03
0-0
.19
1.35
60.
540.
130.
450.
100.
340.
082M
ASS
_J20
5119
45+
4419
306
IC50
7031
2.83
0962
44.3
2514
4366
.40.
099
-0.0
83.
505
2.08
0.38
1.54
0.33
1.10
0.26
2MA
SS_J
2051
1985
+44
2306
5IC
5070
312.
8327
0444
.385
0624
57.5
0.07
50.
283.
015
1.03
0.26
0.91
0.23
0.55
0.15
2MA
SS_J
2051
2099
+44
2619
6IC
5070
312.
8374
6344
.438
7985
73.3
0.03
40.
191.
892
0.89
0.19
0.77
0.16
0.61
0.14
2MA
SS_J
2051
2267
+44
2107
7IC
5070
312.
8444
8344
.352
1279
73.5
0.06
10.
222.
312
1.27
0.24
1.08
0.21
0.86
0.19
2MA
SS_J
2051
2307
+44
2646
1IC
5070
312.
8461
2944
.446
0751
41.4
0.03
5-0
.65
1.22
40.
910.
150.
430.
080.
250.
052M
ASS
_J20
5123
60+
4415
425
IC50
7031
2.84
8329
44.2
6182
1649
.70.
044
0.41
1.98
30.
720.
190.
390.
090.
230.
062M
ASS
_J20
5123
69+
4435
226
IC50
7031
2.84
8633
44.5
8961
2156
.70.
115
0.03
2.94
51.
260.
300.
810.
230.
730.
192M
ASS
_J20
5124
41+
4413
043
IC50
7031
2.85
1717
44.2
1786
2561
.70.
074
0.25
2.47
51.
130.
270.
840.
230.
750.
18R
11_T
1_20
5126
.22+
4405
23.7
IC50
7031
2.85
9283
44.0
8994
8679
.70.
075
0.24
9.07
23.
641.
013.
210.
882.
950.
832M
ASS
_J20
5126
54+
4436
287
IC50
7031
2.86
0504
44.6
0798
2161
.50.
108
0.02
3.89
51.
240.
360.
990.
220.
910.
232M
ASS
_J20
5126
67+
4404
246
IC50
7031
2.86
1175
44.0
7348
7758
.50.
036
-0.2
71.
546
0.90
0.17
1.00
0.21
0.42
0.08
2MA
SS_J
2051
2845
+44
2601
1IC
5070
312.
8685
0044
.433
5936
68.9
0.09
1-0
.36
3.31
61.
440.
351.
110.
290.
890.
242M
ASS
_J20
5130
89+
4406
594
IC50
7031
2.87
8754
44.1
1647
7966
.60.
059
0.75
2.02
31.
200.
221.
180.
180.
900.
162M
ASS
_J20
5132
78+
4423
480
IC50
7031
2.88
6658
44.3
9666
7262
.50.
050
0.03
1.94
50.
980.
200.
700.
150.
520.
112M
ASS
_J20
5133
40+
4434
543
IC50
7031
2.88
9158
44.5
8180
7870
.60.
063
0.34
1.72
30.
910.
190.
890.
170.
750.
162M
ASS
_J20
5133
70+
4410
145
IC50
7031
2.89
0379
44.1
7070
2442
.20.
083
0.81
1.77
30.
730.
180.
470.
110.
360.
102M
ASS
_J20
5138
65+
4403
409
IC50
7031
2.91
1042
44.0
6131
5850
.00.
089
-0.0
12.
136
1.06
0.22
0.64
0.14
0.54
0.12
2MA
SS_J
2051
3925
+44
2428
1IC
5070
312.
9136
0444
.407
7886
73.0
0.03
30.
542.
523
0.90
0.25
0.82
0.22
0.67
0.18
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
20 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
2051
3996
+44
3314
3IC
5070
312.
9164
1244
.553
9247
72.5
0.07
7-0
.02
3.85
21.
350.
371.
350.
341.
080.
282M
ASS
_J20
5141
41+
4415
071
IC50
7031
2.92
2575
44.2
5199
5262
.00.
085
-0.0
34.
555
1.82
0.48
1.57
0.37
1.16
0.26
2MA
SS_J
2051
4599
+44
2835
3IC
5070
312.
9416
5044
.476
4419
52.7
0.07
00.
612.
443
0.98
0.26
0.53
0.12
0.41
0.11
2MA
SS_J
2051
4698
+44
2538
9IC
5070
312.
9457
4244
.427
4772
67.5
0.03
5-0
.16
1.77
60.
740.
170.
510.
120.
460.
122M
ASS
_J20
5147
55+
4425
106
IC50
7031
2.94
8179
44.4
1956
8685
.30.
036
1.11
2.44
10.
850.
230.
790.
210.
780.
222M
ASS
_J20
5148
55+
4405
196
IC50
7031
2.95
2333
44.0
8876
4944
.50.
047
-0.0
72.
356
0.97
0.23
0.61
0.12
0.31
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2051
4886
+44
1102
7IC
5070
312.
9535
8344
.184
0737
44.9
0.04
90.
451.
243
0.64
0.13
0.40
0.09
0.21
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2051
5568
+44
3352
6IC
5070
312.
9821
1744
.564
6276
71.9
0.05
51.
103.
051
1.83
0.33
1.72
0.27
1.33
0.22
2MA
SS_J
2051
5722
+44
0216
1IC
5070
312.
9883
4244
.037
7516
50.8
0.18
90.
512.
863
0.74
0.25
1.05
0.30
0.89
0.26
2MA
SS_J
2051
5864
+44
1456
8IC
5070
312.
9943
2544
.249
1054
52.0
0.04
9-0
.03
1.92
61.
310.
210.
570.
110.
400.
082M
ASS
_J20
5200
17+
4419
590
IC50
7031
3.00
0671
44.3
3301
1743
.70.
031
0.22
2.08
50.
750.
200.
280.
080.
190.
042M
ASS
_J20
5200
99+
4428
413
IC50
7031
3.00
4150
44.4
7819
5948
.70.
032
-0.2
41.
306
0.65
0.15
0.54
0.09
0.42
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2052
0672
+44
2755
3IC
5070
313.
0279
2544
.465
3350
56.2
0.10
30.
902.
263
1.48
0.26
1.03
0.19
1.12
0.23
2MA
SS_J
2052
1294
+44
2053
4IC
5070
313.
0538
3344
.348
1632
74.9
0.07
30.
476.
462
2.43
0.64
2.07
0.57
1.68
0.48
2MA
SS_J
2052
1545
+44
2810
7IC
5070
313.
0643
9244
.469
6772
53.2
0.06
00.
151.
555
0.76
0.16
0.54
0.10
0.47
0.09
2MA
SS_J
2052
1841
+44
1630
5IC
5070
313.
0767
5044
.275
1135
59.2
0.06
80.
363.
053
1.40
0.34
0.93
0.21
0.71
0.17
2MA
SS_J
2052
2802
+44
0331
1IC
5070
313.
1168
5044
.058
6775
84.9
0.07
90.
354.
662
1.63
0.47
1.71
0.46
1.81
0.46
2MA
SS_J
2052
2831
+44
2114
5IC
5070
313.
1180
4244
.354
0873
54.7
0.06
1-0
.00
1.60
51.
390.
200.
980.
140.
630.
112M
ASS
_J20
5230
89+
4420
115
IC50
7031
3.12
8725
44.3
3649
7055
.30.
084
0.19
1.86
51.
370.
220.
900.
170.
860.
162M
ASS
_J20
5234
37+
4417
402
IC50
7031
3.14
3158
44.2
9452
5556
.80.
051
-0.0
51.
855
0.99
0.21
0.86
0.16
0.51
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2052
3531
+44
3319
3IC
5070
313.
1470
9644
.555
3724
50.1
0.04
9-0
.20
2.36
60.
950.
240.
400.
110.
270.
082M
ASS
_J20
5236
47+
4411
463
IC50
7031
3.15
1887
44.1
9621
4549
.80.
093
0.01
3.73
62.
040.
400.
820.
210.
740.
152M
ASS
_J20
5248
66+
4419
507
IC50
7031
3.20
2821
44.3
3069
3346
.60.
049
0.34
1.96
50.
820.
190.
290.
060.
310.
072M
ASS
_J20
5254
30+
4352
165
IC50
7031
3.22
6258
43.8
7121
5155
.60.
121
0.73
2.77
31.
280.
281.
040.
221.
410.
222M
ASS
_J20
5257
28+
4440
463
IC50
7031
3.23
8800
44.6
7954
4844
.20.
036
0.18
1.54
50.
860.
180.
320.
070.
170.
042M
ASS
_J20
5301
79+
4419
058
IC50
7031
3.25
7508
44.3
1826
2955
.50.
070
0.46
2.31
30.
880.
220.
630.
160.
390.
122M
ASS
_J20
5303
29+
4439
488
IC50
7031
3.26
3700
44.6
6358
2446
.30.
040
-0.5
21.
516
0.64
0.16
0.31
0.08
0.19
0.05
2MA
SS_J
2053
0817
+44
0514
3IC
5070
313.
2840
8744
.087
2516
38.2
0.12
00.
272.
273
0.67
0.20
0.67
0.18
0.48
0.13
2MA
SS_J
2053
1400
+44
1257
7IC
5070
313.
3083
5044
.216
0655
54.9
0.06
90.
032.
075
1.00
0.21
0.58
0.16
0.46
0.12
2MA
SS_J
2053
1456
+44
2906
1IC
5070
313.
3106
0844
.485
1031
44.4
0.03
70.
082.
285
1.15
0.26
0.54
0.16
0.17
0.04
2MA
SS_J
2053
1707
+44
3834
3IC
5070
313.
3212
2944
.642
8434
46.1
0.05
40.
181.
895
0.96
0.21
0.41
0.09
0.23
0.07
R11
_T1_
2053
17.4
9+44
2802
.1IC
5070
313.
3228
7544
.467
2636
45.3
0.05
30.
201.
905
0.76
0.18
0.43
0.10
0.25
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2053
2772
+44
1034
5IC
5070
313.
3655
7144
.176
2724
49.1
0.10
80.
012.
086
0.88
0.21
0.48
0.11
0.54
0.14
2MA
SS_J
2053
2968
+44
2356
6IC
5070
313.
3736
8844
.399
0419
57.9
0.16
10.
202.
375
0.85
0.23
0.79
0.20
0.72
0.23
2MA
SS_J
2053
3044
+44
2643
5IC
5070
313.
3768
9244
.445
4517
51.1
0.06
90.
132.
235
0.75
0.22
0.87
0.17
0.32
0.10
2MA
SS_J
2053
3137
+44
1334
5IC
5070
313.
3807
6744
.226
2645
48.3
0.06
2-0
.13
1.63
60.
790.
170.
470.
110.
350.
082M
ASS
_J20
5332
71+
4449
117
IC50
7031
3.38
6350
44.8
1994
7948
.40.
058
0.10
1.17
50.
590.
130.
750.
110.
560.
08R
11_T
1_20
5334
.32+
4407
40.5
IC50
7031
3.39
3004
44.1
2792
6641
.80.
061
-0.2
11.
146
0.52
0.13
0.35
0.09
0.46
0.08
2MA
SS_J
2053
3478
+44
2917
9IC
5070
313.
3949
0044
.488
2642
54.5
0.05
80.
102.
755
1.35
0.29
1.88
0.35
0.45
0.11
2MA
SS_J
2053
3544
+44
2748
1IC
5070
313.
3977
3844
.463
3551
55.1
0.10
1-0
.01
2.76
51.
220.
300.
810.
200.
680.
172M
ASS
_J20
5340
14+
4410
455
IC50
7031
3.41
7237
44.1
7936
4353
.10.
088
0.38
2.87
31.
200.
280.
920.
190.
760.
16C
ontin
ued
onne
xtpa
ge
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 21
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
2053
4270
+44
0348
6IC
5070
313.
4279
7944
.063
5183
67.5
0.06
40.
432.
423
1.55
0.28
1.11
0.22
1.01
0.19
2MA
SS_J
2053
5690
+44
5131
9IC
5070
313.
4871
5044
.858
8816
35.4
0.41
3-0
.56
5.41
41.
820.
552.
120.
451.
820.
482M
ASS
_J20
5023
59+
4451
264
IC50
7031
2.59
8237
44.8
5727
5445
.90.
060
-0.1
51.
476
0.71
0.15
0.40
0.08
0.29
0.07
2MA
SS_J
2050
3699
+44
2049
8IC
5070
312.
6540
5444
.347
1851
60.3
0.05
2-0
.05
1.30
51.
090.
170.
890.
200.
630.
122M
ASS
_J20
5042
80+
4421
554
IC50
7031
2.67
8283
44.3
6551
2053
.00.
058
-0.1
22.
386
0.90
0.24
0.52
0.13
0.36
0.09
2MA
SS_J
2050
5418
+44
3808
3IC
5070
312.
7258
6344
.635
6372
55.9
0.06
20.
151.
685
0.84
0.18
0.53
0.12
0.37
0.09
2MA
SS_J
2050
5429
+44
1752
6IC
5070
312.
7262
5844
.297
9456
49.2
0.04
80.
121.
925
0.87
0.19
0.54
0.11
0.29
0.06
2MA
SS_J
2050
5747
+44
2445
6IC
5070
312.
7394
4244
.412
7432
46.2
0.05
7-0
.19
2.00
60.
850.
210.
750.
170.
360.
082M
ASS
_J20
5101
46+
4415
344
IC50
7031
2.75
6042
44.2
5957
6753
.30.
048
-0.1
31.
326
0.71
0.14
0.37
0.09
0.37
0.08
2MA
SS_J
2051
1606
+44
1500
0IC
5070
312.
8169
5444
.250
0018
52.7
0.10
2-0
.03
1.49
60.
710.
170.
460.
130.
870.
182M
ASS
_J20
5342
61+
4353
536
IC50
7031
3.42
7521
43.8
9823
2033
.80.
285
-0.2
03.
134
1.15
0.31
1.04
0.25
1.11
0.30
LkH
a_17
0IC
5070
313.
0532
2544
.323
9287
78.5
0.03
60.
021.
142
0.63
0.13
0.53
0.12
0.51
0.11
Var
iabl
e_R
_312
.743
500_
44.5
4825
6IC
5070
312.
7435
0044
.548
2636
42.5
0.04
20.
251.
315
0.66
0.14
1.08
0.26
0.22
0.05
Var
iabl
e_I_
312.
7082
21_4
4.04
3568
IC50
7031
2.70
8221
44.0
4357
5447
.50.
077
-0.0
71.
666
0.88
0.19
0.43
0.11
0.36
0.10
H08
_215
0511
2+47
4813
0IC
5146
327.
7130
0047
.803
6122
64.3
0.09
30.
6513
.02
13.
971.
382.
980.
972.
160.
71H
08_2
1523
075+
4714
064
IC51
4632
8.12
8125
47.2
3511
2757
.70.
077
0.24
2.43
51.
330.
260.
990.
200.
870.
17H
08_2
1523
264+
4713
460
IC51
4632
8.13
6000
47.2
2944
2851
.10.
089
-0.1
82.
016
1.05
0.22
0.63
0.13
0.66
0.15
H08
_215
2327
7+47
1409
6IC
5146
328.
1365
4247
.236
0027
50.4
0.06
20.
113.
145
1.03
0.29
0.64
0.14
0.40
0.09
H08
_215
2345
6+47
1440
7IC
5146
328.
1440
0047
.244
6421
47.0
0.03
81.
092.
031
0.77
0.20
0.45
0.10
0.33
0.06
H08
_215
2365
8+47
1436
8IC
5146
328.
1524
1747
.243
5627
45.3
0.03
60.
531.
803
0.97
0.21
0.41
0.08
0.20
0.05
H08
_215
2412
2+47
1252
1IC
5146
328.
1717
5047
.214
4723
57.2
0.04
90.
301.
465
0.47
0.14
0.38
0.10
0.38
0.09
H08
_215
2427
3+47
1013
1IC
5146
328.
1780
4247
.170
3124
84.3
0.04
10.
392.
442
0.84
0.23
0.81
0.22
0.76
0.21
H08
_215
3039
7+47
2330
7IC
5146
328.
2665
4247
.391
8626
69.8
0.04
10.
471.
013
0.52
0.12
0.36
0.09
0.38
0.08
H08
_215
3203
5+47
1257
9IC
5146
328.
3347
9247
.216
0817
46.9
0.05
20.
642.
163
0.84
0.22
0.93
0.30
0.31
0.07
H08
_215
3230
5+47
1408
7IC
5146
328.
3460
4247
.235
7519
49.2
0.06
70.
483.
433
1.43
0.38
1.27
0.34
0.48
0.11
H08
_215
3258
1+47
1551
4IC
5146
328.
3575
4247
.264
2820
60.4
0.04
3-0
.08
1.48
50.
610.
160.
570.
160.
340.
09H
08_2
1532
961+
4713
542
IC51
4632
8.37
3375
47.2
3172
2861
.40.
036
1.19
1.04
11.
040.
191.
080.
180.
740.
13H
08_2
1533
050+
4714
440
IC51
4632
8.37
7083
47.2
4556
2169
.50.
059
0.20
2.28
20.
770.
220.
770.
230.
580.
17H
08_2
1533
820+
4714
590
IC51
4632
8.40
9167
47.2
4972
2551
.80.
065
-0.5
82.
276
0.99
0.24
1.48
0.35
0.42
0.10
H08
_215
3418
7+47
1750
3IC
5146
328.
4244
5847
.297
3124
47.2
0.05
11.
072.
011
1.07
0.24
0.45
0.11
0.21
0.06
H08
_215
3421
5+47
1553
5IC
5146
328.
4256
2547
.264
8626
60.4
0.04
40.
441.
643
0.63
0.16
0.42
0.12
0.40
0.10
H08
_215
3425
0+47
1825
0IC
5146
328.
4270
8347
.306
9424
52.5
0.04
30.
271.
145
0.48
0.12
0.79
0.17
0.39
0.08
H08
_215
3465
3+47
1435
7IC
5146
328.
4438
7547
.243
2526
43.1
0.09
90.
301.
005
0.72
0.14
0.65
0.15
0.43
0.12
H08
_215
3574
8+46
5944
2IC
5146
328.
4895
0046
.995
6124
78.9
0.05
7-0
.08
5.68
61.
940.
582.
100.
551.
750.
49H
08_2
1540
032+
4725
221
IC51
4632
8.50
1333
47.4
2281
2561
.50.
055
0.01
3.65
51.
610.
381.
100.
270.
690.
19H
08_2
1540
878+
4713
575
IC51
4632
8.53
6583
47.2
3264
1647
.60.
110
0.30
1.18
50.
480.
130.
610.
150.
480.
14H
08_2
1553
579+
4704
446
IC51
4632
8.89
9125
47.0
7906
1951
.30.
072
-0.2
21.
126
0.45
0.12
0.25
0.08
0.42
0.11
H08
_215
2196
2+47
1351
5IC
5146
328.
0817
5047
.230
9730
82.8
0.03
30.
161.
122
0.37
0.11
0.35
0.11
0.36
0.11
H08
_215
2224
6+47
1307
7IC
5146
328.
0935
8347
.218
8125
55.0
0.15
00.
491.
933
0.80
0.21
0.60
0.15
0.67
0.19
H08
_215
2228
2+47
1055
0IC
5146
328.
0950
8347
.181
9419
41.5
0.06
30.
381.
255
0.72
0.16
0.29
0.07
0.29
0.08
H08
_215
2307
5+47
1406
4IC
5146
328.
1281
2547
.235
1127
57.7
0.07
70.
242.
435
1.33
0.26
0.99
0.20
0.87
0.17
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
22 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
H08
_215
2316
8+47
1345
1IC
5146
328.
1320
0047
.229
1925
51.7
0.09
00.
091.
605
0.75
0.18
0.43
0.14
0.54
0.13
H08
_215
2326
4+47
1346
0IC
5146
328.
1360
0047
.229
4428
51.1
0.08
9-0
.18
2.01
61.
050.
220.
630.
130.
660.
15H
08_2
1523
277+
4714
096
IC51
4632
8.13
6542
47.2
3600
2750
.40.
062
0.11
3.14
51.
030.
290.
640.
140.
400.
09H
08_2
1523
278+
4711
386
IC51
4632
8.13
6583
47.1
9406
2786
.40.
076
0.78
1.03
10.
420.
110.
490.
170.
480.
14H
08_2
1523
456+
4714
407
IC51
4632
8.14
4000
47.2
4464
2147
.00.
038
1.09
2.03
10.
770.
200.
450.
100.
330.
06H
08_2
1523
512+
4710
097
IC51
4632
8.14
6333
47.1
6936
1946
.30.
138
-0.2
82.
676
1.14
0.28
0.94
0.31
0.66
0.17
H08
_215
2354
5+47
1128
6IC
5146
328.
1477
0847
.191
2816
47.8
0.05
2-0
.05
1.07
60.
450.
120.
170.
050.
270.
07H
08_2
1523
658+
4714
368
IC51
4632
8.15
2417
47.2
4356
2745
.30.
036
0.53
1.80
30.
970.
210.
410.
080.
200.
05H
08_2
1523
731+
4712
344
IC51
4632
8.15
5458
47.2
0956
2040
.20.
068
0.82
1.52
30.
440.
140.
410.
090.
330.
08H
08_2
1524
122+
4712
521
IC51
4632
8.17
1750
47.2
1447
2357
.20.
049
0.30
1.46
50.
470.
140.
380.
100.
380.
09H
08_2
1524
273+
4710
131
IC51
4632
8.17
8042
47.1
7031
2484
.30.
041
0.39
2.44
20.
840.
230.
810.
220.
760.
21H
08_2
1531
683+
4715
299
IC51
4632
8.32
0125
47.2
5831
2247
.30.
021
-0.2
61.
016
0.41
0.12
0.35
0.09
0.12
0.03
H08
_215
3196
3+47
1602
9IC
5146
328.
3317
9247
.267
4719
41.8
0.05
8-0
.04
3.02
60.
940.
281.
090.
230.
250.
07H
08_2
1531
996+
4715
399
IC51
4632
8.33
3167
47.2
6108
2041
.70.
065
0.34
3.00
31.
050.
301.
400.
300.
280.
07H
08_2
1532
035+
4712
579
IC51
4632
8.33
4792
47.2
1608
1746
.90.
052
0.64
2.16
30.
840.
220.
930.
300.
310.
07H
08_2
1532
120+
4714
025
IC51
4632
8.33
8333
47.2
3403
2647
.30.
031
0.65
4.23
31.
700.
471.
270.
310.
230.
06H
08_2
1532
135+
4716
018
IC51
4632
8.33
8958
47.2
6717
2445
.80.
039
0.36
3.64
31.
410.
371.
460.
470.
190.
05H
08_2
1532
159+
4714
137
IC51
4632
8.33
9958
47.2
3714
1750
.60.
075
0.48
3.81
31.
430.
370.
590.
160.
410.
11H
08_2
1532
175+
4713
329
IC51
4632
8.34
0625
47.2
2581
1944
.30.
095
-0.4
44.
016
1.22
0.38
1.47
0.39
0.49
0.11
H08
_215
3225
0+47
1417
5IC
5146
328.
3437
5047
.238
1927
55.5
0.06
60.
172.
065
0.93
0.21
1.10
0.23
0.40
0.11
H08
_215
3230
5+47
1408
7IC
5146
328.
3460
4247
.235
7519
49.2
0.06
70.
483.
433
1.43
0.38
1.27
0.34
0.48
0.11
H08
_215
3236
8+47
1905
2IC
5146
328.
3486
6747
.318
1120
39.2
0.05
5-0
.27
1.50
60.
670.
170.
890.
190.
250.
06H
08_2
1532
525+
4714
576
IC51
4632
8.35
5208
47.2
4933
1844
.40.
023
-0.2
41.
326
0.53
0.14
0.28
0.08
0.12
0.03
H08
_215
3258
1+47
1551
4IC
5146
328.
3575
4247
.264
2820
60.4
0.04
3-0
.08
1.48
50.
610.
160.
570.
160.
340.
09H
08_2
1532
961+
4713
542
IC51
4632
8.37
3375
47.2
3172
2861
.40.
036
1.19
1.04
11.
040.
191.
080.
180.
740.
13H
08_2
1533
050+
4714
440
IC51
4632
8.37
7083
47.2
4556
2169
.50.
059
0.20
2.28
20.
770.
220.
770.
230.
580.
17H
08_2
1533
820+
4714
590
IC51
4632
8.40
9167
47.2
4972
2551
.80.
065
-0.5
82.
276
0.99
0.24
1.48
0.35
0.42
0.10
H08
_215
3418
7+47
1750
3IC
5146
328.
4244
5847
.297
3124
47.2
0.05
11.
072.
011
1.07
0.24
0.45
0.11
0.21
0.06
H08
_215
3421
5+47
1553
5IC
5146
328.
4256
2547
.264
8626
60.4
0.04
40.
441.
643
0.63
0.16
0.42
0.12
0.40
0.10
H08
_215
3425
0+47
1825
0IC
5146
328.
4270
8347
.306
9424
52.5
0.04
30.
271.
145
0.48
0.12
0.79
0.17
0.39
0.08
H08
_215
3465
3+47
1435
7IC
5146
328.
4438
7547
.243
2526
43.1
0.09
90.
301.
005
0.72
0.14
0.65
0.15
0.43
0.12
Var
iabl
e_V
_328
.709
503_
47.6
8756
9IC
5146
328.
7095
0047
.687
5630
57.5
0.02
31.
153.
031
0.97
0.29
0.64
0.19
0.45
0.11
Var
iabl
e_V
_327
.827
057_
47.5
7705
3IC
5146
327.
8270
4247
.577
0324
57.6
0.09
4-0
.18
1.87
60.
710.
180.
520.
140.
670.
16V
aria
ble_
V_3
28.5
2029
4_47
.114
960
IC51
4632
8.52
0292
47.1
1494
2453
.50.
120
-0.2
22.
606
0.97
0.27
0.81
0.22
0.72
0.19
Var
iabl
e_V
_328
.435
669_
47.5
9556
2IC
5146
328.
4356
6747
.595
5624
34.2
0.27
3-0
.28
2.03
40.
730.
200.
940.
240.
860.
25V
aria
ble_
V_3
27.7
6934
8_47
.164
249
IC51
4632
7.76
9333
47.1
6422
2242
.00.
197
-0.0
42.
246
0.95
0.23
0.79
0.22
0.79
0.22
Var
iabl
e_V
_328
.568
512_
46.8
9204
8IC
5146
328.
5685
0046
.892
0320
58.6
0.12
7-0
.27
2.19
61.
080.
260.
690.
220.
880.
21V
aria
ble_
V_3
28.0
7406
6_47
.578
243
IC51
4632
8.07
4042
47.5
7822
2263
.10.
136
0.03
3.10
50.
940.
280.
800.
200.
800.
23V
aria
ble_
R_3
28.8
6471
6_47
.158
390
IC51
4632
8.86
4708
47.1
5839
2473
.20.
054
1.03
1.47
10.
900.
200.
850.
210.
660.
16V
aria
ble_
I_32
8.78
3020
_47.
4462
39IC
5146
328.
7830
0047
.446
2219
42.1
0.23
60.
302.
633
0.94
0.26
0.62
0.15
1.11
0.28
2MA
SS_J
0641
1725
+09
5432
3N
GC
2264
100.
3218
759.
9089
737
60.7
0.03
00.
501.
953
0.82
0.19
0.53
0.13
0.39
0.10
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 23
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
0641
0934
+09
5608
1N
GC
2264
100.
2889
179.
9355
818
53.4
0.05
80.
352.
333
0.97
0.24
0.34
0.11
0.34
0.09
2MA
SS_J
0641
0896
+09
3346
0N
GC
2264
100.
2873
339.
5627
821
42.5
0.02
2-0
.16
1.03
60.
480.
120.
260.
060.
130.
032M
ASS
_J06
4121
00+
0933
361
NG
C22
6410
0.33
7500
9.56
003
3666
.90.
026
0.01
1.10
50.
600.
130.
460.
110.
370.
092M
ASS
_J06
4057
83+
0941
201
NG
C22
6410
0.24
0958
9.68
892
3271
.20.
044
0.42
1.98
30.
890.
210.
700.
180.
680.
162M
ASS
_J06
4049
27+
0923
503
NG
C22
6410
0.20
5292
9.39
731
3365
.90.
038
0.49
1.60
30.
560.
170.
530.
140.
360.
102M
ASS
_J06
4142
87+
0925
084
NG
C22
6410
0.42
8625
9.41
900
3350
.60.
075
-0.2
81.
836
0.75
0.18
0.48
0.11
0.40
0.10
2MA
SS_J
0641
1185
+09
2631
4N
GC
2264
100.
2993
759.
4420
636
66.9
0.11
9-0
.68
3.95
41.
990.
421.
600.
411.
200.
302M
ASS
_J06
4100
50+
0945
031
NG
C22
6410
0.25
2083
9.75
086
3475
.30.
033
0.71
2.20
10.
880.
230.
800.
190.
640.
172M
ASS
_J06
4144
22+
0925
024
NG
C22
6410
0.43
4250
9.41
733
3145
.80.
043
0.33
1.17
50.
670.
140.
400.
080.
300.
062M
ASS
_J06
4118
37+
0939
411
NG
C22
6410
0.32
6542
9.66
142
3147
.60.
067
-0.7
21.
284
0.60
0.15
0.41
0.10
0.40
0.09
2MA
SS_J
0641
2119
+09
3214
6N
GC
2264
100.
3382
929.
5373
920
44.0
0.05
00.
011.
486
0.65
0.16
0.18
0.05
0.34
0.07
2MA
SS_J
0640
4100
+09
2754
3N
GC
2264
100.
1708
339.
4650
831
23.4
0.23
7-0
.08
1.23
40.
650.
140.
460.
100.
700.
182M
ASS
_J06
4058
67+
0936
132
NG
C22
6410
0.24
4458
9.60
367
2447
.60.
032
0.77
1.42
30.
660.
150.
350.
080.
150.
042M
ASS
_J06
4050
59+
0954
573
NG
C22
6410
0.21
0792
9.91
592
3574
.90.
029
0.90
1.85
11.
050.
230.
790.
200.
670.
162M
ASS
_J06
4045
16+
0928
444
NG
C22
6410
0.18
8167
9.47
900
3873
.60.
016
1.00
2.16
10.
870.
220.
760.
190.
630.
162M
ASS
_J06
4058
82+
0939
187
NG
C22
6410
0.24
5083
9.65
519
2848
.90.
037
0.25
1.03
50.
650.
130.
350.
090.
330.
062M
ASS
_J06
4127
00+
0930
131
NG
C22
6410
0.36
2500
9.50
364
2643
.50.
059
0.47
1.01
30.
340.
110.
410.
110.
260.
072M
ASS
_J06
4054
26+
0949
203
NG
C22
6410
0.22
6083
9.82
231
3254
.00.
029
0.13
1.14
50.
590.
130.
390.
080.
260.
062M
ASS
_J06
4109
08+
0930
090
NG
C22
6410
0.28
7833
9.50
250
3560
.90.
098
0.36
2.57
30.
980.
270.
740.
220.
730.
192M
ASS
_J06
4052
92+
0944
544
NG
C22
6410
0.22
0500
9.74
844
3574
.20.
028
0.57
1.12
30.
520.
120.
490.
120.
410.
102M
ASS
_J06
4104
97+
0950
460
NG
C22
6410
0.27
0708
9.84
611
3674
.00.
018
0.71
3.53
11.
420.
371.
220.
330.
990.
262M
ASS
_J06
4059
68+
0928
438
NG
C22
6410
0.24
8667
9.47
883
3355
.50.
036
0.07
1.69
50.
620.
170.
500.
110.
340.
082M
ASS
_J06
4047
11+
0932
401
NG
C22
6410
0.19
6292
9.54
447
3556
.50.
043
-0.3
31.
926
0.87
0.19
0.62
0.13
0.44
0.09
2MA
SS_J
0641
1485
+09
2555
0N
GC
2264
100.
3118
759.
4319
423
60.4
0.09
70.
873.
253
1.90
0.39
3.10
0.71
1.24
0.26
2MA
SS_J
0641
1521
+09
3757
6N
GC
2264
100.
3133
759.
6326
724
48.5
0.05
2-0
.31
1.55
61.
060.
190.
550.
110.
380.
082M
ASS
_J06
4116
68+
0929
522
NG
C22
6410
0.31
9500
9.49
783
3769
.30.
031
0.61
2.64
31.
740.
321.
550.
281.
230.
222M
ASS
_J06
4101
11+
0934
522
NG
C22
6410
0.25
4625
9.58
117
3049
.90.
076
-0.0
61.
406
0.69
0.15
0.57
0.13
0.41
0.10
2MA
SS_J
0640
4114
+09
3357
8N
GC
2264
100.
1714
179.
5660
632
64.4
0.05
0-0
.00
2.66
51.
100.
261.
020.
210.
760.
162M
ASS
_J06
4056
16+
0936
309
NG
C22
6410
0.23
4000
9.60
858
2374
.40.
080
0.74
11.1
21
3.79
1.18
3.38
1.03
3.25
0.94
2MA
SS_J
0641
0429
+09
2452
1N
GC
2264
100.
2678
759.
4144
737
62.5
0.03
4-0
.32
1.23
60.
580.
140.
610.
120.
350.
082M
ASS
_J06
4056
39+
0935
533
NG
C22
6410
0.23
4958
9.59
814
3157
.80.
037
0.20
1.78
50.
910.
190.
400.
110.
300.
082M
ASS
_J06
4059
32+
0946
165
NG
C22
6410
0.24
7167
9.77
125
3455
.50.
066
0.27
2.02
51.
000.
220.
630.
150.
600.
142M
ASS
_J06
4114
75+
0934
134
NG
C22
6410
0.31
1458
9.57
039
2378
.80.
089
0.28
2.77
21.
180.
300.
980.
260.
900.
242M
ASS
_J06
4048
84+
0943
256
NG
C22
6410
0.20
3500
9.72
378
3167
.90.
078
0.19
2.62
21.
060.
280.
850.
230.
940.
212M
ASS
_J06
4049
21+
0957
387
NG
C22
6410
0.20
5042
9.96
075
2249
.70.
070
0.55
1.54
30.
870.
190.
690.
130.
390.
092M
ASS
_J06
4059
49+
0929
517
NG
C22
6410
0.24
7875
9.49
769
3152
.30.
034
0.36
1.14
50.
540.
130.
290.
060.
220.
052M
ASS
_J06
4100
51+
0929
159
NG
C22
6410
0.25
2125
9.48
775
3774
.90.
034
0.28
5.00
22.
020.
511.
670.
431.
430.
372M
ASS
_J06
4147
80+
0934
096
NG
C22
6410
0.44
9167
9.56
933
3573
.20.
023
0.34
1.75
21.
040.
200.
870.
170.
760.
142M
ASS
_J06
4131
11+
0926
582
NG
C22
6410
0.37
9625
9.44
950
3671
.70.
025
1.00
3.24
11.
840.
381.
610.
331.
290.
272M
ASS
_J06
4115
11+
0926
443
NG
C22
6410
0.31
2958
9.44
564
3276
.50.
045
-0.2
02.
056
0.89
0.21
0.75
0.17
0.72
0.17
2MA
SS_J
0640
4837
+09
4838
5N
GC
2264
100.
2015
429.
8106
925
43.2
0.08
2-0
.18
2.14
61.
180.
240.
760.
150.
600.
11C
ontin
ued
onne
xtpa
ge
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
24 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
2MA
SS_J
0640
5884
+09
3057
3N
GC
2264
100.
2451
679.
5159
232
76.2
0.02
10.
042.
482
0.98
0.25
0.88
0.22
0.74
0.19
2MA
SS_J
0640
4321
+09
4707
2N
GC
2264
100.
1800
429.
7853
333
47.3
0.11
3-0
.79
4.68
42.
090.
531.
390.
310.
680.
152M
ASS
_J06
4113
29+
0931
503
NG
C22
6410
0.30
5375
9.53
064
1845
.70.
044
-1.2
61.
484
0.71
0.18
0.56
0.15
0.27
0.06
2MA
SS_J
0640
5255
+09
5205
9N
GC
2264
100.
2189
589.
8683
129
49.9
0.06
50.
022.
836
1.51
0.32
0.57
0.13
0.52
0.10
2MA
SS_J
0640
4989
+09
3649
4N
GC
2264
100.
2078
759.
6137
235
63.6
0.03
80.
061.
095
0.61
0.12
0.36
0.09
0.26
0.07
2MA
SS_J
0640
1515
+10
0157
8N
GC
2264
100.
0631
2510
.032
7217
75.7
0.10
50.
645.
941
1.94
0.61
1.54
0.50
1.54
0.48
2MA
SS_J
0640
4131
+09
5102
3N
GC
2264
100.
1721
259.
8506
437
57.4
0.07
0-0
.16
2.02
60.
930.
220.
600.
130.
590.
132M
ASS
_J06
4039
11+
0950
586
NG
C22
6410
0.16
2958
9.84
961
3752
.70.
065
-0.4
32.
196
0.95
0.23
0.51
0.14
0.45
0.11
2MA
SS_J
0640
3086
+09
3440
5N
GC
2264
100.
1285
839.
5779
237
73.3
0.04
70.
074.
452
2.03
0.50
1.66
0.42
1.43
0.36
2MA
SS_J
0640
2262
+09
4946
2N
GC
2264
100.
0942
509.
8295
022
46.5
0.06
70.
451.
833
1.28
0.24
0.82
0.16
0.72
0.13
2MA
SS_J
0640
0266
+09
3524
2N
GC
2264
100.
0110
839.
5900
619
44.9
0.02
60.
611.
513
0.51
0.15
0.30
0.08
0.14
0.03
2MA
SS_J
0640
4113
+09
5256
5N
GC
2264
100.
1713
759.
8823
632
61.0
0.03
0-0
.55
1.68
60.
910.
170.
460.
100.
380.
082M
ASS
_J06
4036
52+
0950
456
NG
C22
6410
0.15
2167
9.84
600
2953
.80.
051
0.38
1.59
50.
810.
180.
440.
100.
320.
092M
ASS
_J06
4024
16+
0934
124
NG
C22
6410
0.10
0667
9.57
011
2958
.80.
112
0.50
3.50
31.
810.
401.
400.
291.
100.
242M
ASS
_J06
4038
19+
0929
524
NG
C22
6410
0.15
9125
9.49
789
2160
.90.
040
0.91
2.33
31.
290.
280.
950.
200.
690.
142M
ASS
_J06
4039
34+
0934
455
NG
C22
6410
0.16
3917
9.57
931
2960
.20.
089
0.18
2.90
51.
300.
320.
900.
220.
840.
192M
ASS
_J06
3933
39+
0952
017
NG
C22
6499
.889
125
9.86
714
3264
.40.
038
0.41
1.41
30.
570.
140.
450.
090.
300.
082M
ASS
_J06
3934
41+
0954
512
NG
C22
6499
.893
375
9.91
422
3250
.50.
034
-0.2
41.
516
0.80
0.16
0.37
0.10
0.17
0.05
2MA
SS_J
0640
3446
+09
3518
2N
GC
2264
100.
1435
839.
5883
925
41.9
0.03
90.
361.
365
0.75
0.18
0.34
0.08
0.24
0.05
2MA
SS_J
0640
2309
+09
2742
3N
GC
2264
100.
0962
089.
4617
532
70.3
0.07
50.
245.
672
2.57
0.60
2.08
0.50
1.77
0.42
2MA
SS_J
0640
3059
+09
5014
7N
GC
2264
100.
1274
589.
8374
216
44.1
0.05
5-0
.11
2.13
60.
980.
220.
260.
060.
420.
092M
ASS
_J06
4037
87+
0934
540
NG
C22
6410
0.15
7792
9.58
167
3129
.50.
363
-0.1
12.
484
1.55
0.28
1.19
0.41
0.96
0.30
2MA
SS_J
0640
1370
+09
5630
5N
GC
2264
100.
0570
839.
9418
133
53.4
0.04
2-0
.12
1.26
60.
430.
120.
510.
110.
390.
072M
ASS
_J06
4041
84+
0951
445
NG
C22
6410
0.17
4333
9.86
236
3572
.30.
043
-0.2
54.
866
1.72
0.49
1.44
0.41
1.15
0.34
2MA
SS_J
0640
2881
+09
4824
0N
GC
2264
100.
1200
429.
8066
734
46.5
0.03
4-0
.09
3.88
61.
370.
380.
720.
200.
240.
052M
ASS
_J06
4036
65+
0952
032
NG
C22
6410
0.15
2708
9.86
756
3364
.80.
043
-0.5
01.
966
0.74
0.19
0.64
0.14
0.48
0.12
2MA
SS_J
0640
0600
+09
4942
6N
GC
2264
100.
0250
009.
8285
024
66.1
0.07
10.
222.
032
0.94
0.21
0.64
0.20
0.62
0.16
2MA
SS_J
0640
1113
+09
3805
9N
GC
2264
100.
0463
759.
6349
729
68.9
0.04
60.
083.
972
1.52
0.42
1.38
0.36
1.05
0.27
2MA
SS_J
0640
0552
+09
2226
0N
GC
2264
100.
0230
009.
3738
923
47.6
0.07
9-0
.44
2.28
61.
560.
291.
540.
270.
610.
122M
ASS
_J06
3959
24+
0927
245
NG
C22
6499
.996
833
9.45
681
3067
.90.
062
0.56
1.24
30.
620.
140.
600.
120.
950.
152M
ASS
_J06
3925
50+
0931
394
NG
C22
6499
.856
250
9.52
761
2069
.00.
071
0.69
2.91
30.
990.
290.
900.
240.
710.
21V
aria
ble_
V_1
00.2
7368
9_9.
9051
52N
GC
2264
100.
2736
879.
9051
534
47.9
0.03
20.
052.
305
0.85
0.22
0.32
0.09
0.16
0.04
Var
iabl
e_R
_99.
9984
66_9
.586
287
NG
C22
6499
.998
463
9.58
629
2967
.50.
030
0.38
1.43
30.
740.
150.
710.
140.
470.
09V
aria
ble_
R_1
00.2
0474
2_9.
6267
48N
GC
2264
100.
2047
429.
6267
528
56.7
0.05
60.
822.
003
0.96
0.23
0.61
0.15
0.62
0.13
Var
iabl
e_R
_100
.220
932_
9.88
3164
NG
C22
6410
0.22
0929
9.88
316
2745
.80.
093
-0.9
87.
134
5.01
0.95
0.89
0.22
0.43
0.12
Var
iabl
e_R
_100
.217
537_
9.87
5288
NG
C22
6410
0.21
7533
9.87
529
2449
.90.
074
-0.7
05.
324
1.97
0.57
0.94
0.25
0.65
0.14
Var
iabl
e_I_
99.9
1410
8_9.
7559
66N
GC
2264
99.9
1410
49.
7559
633
76.0
0.04
20.
852.
491
1.45
0.29
1.26
0.26
1.01
0.21
B07
_000
6N
GC
2244
97.8
3000
05.
0730
621
40.8
0.05
60.
741.
253
0.63
0.15
0.57
0.14
0.33
0.07
B07
_005
5N
GC
2244
97.8
6625
04.
8341
721
62.7
0.05
4-0
.24
2.63
60.
980.
250.
820.
190.
640.
15B
07_0
066
NG
C22
4497
.870
417
4.87
028
1867
.80.
036
0.68
1.40
30.
540.
140.
340.
090.
250.
08B
07_0
094
NG
C22
4497
.891
250
4.77
417
2142
.30.
050
0.32
1.51
50.
620.
160.
370.
090.
250.
06C
ontin
ued
onne
xtpa
ge
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
HOYS-CAPS 25
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
B07
_009
8N
GC
2244
97.8
9333
34.
6833
319
40.3
0.04
00.
621.
213
0.47
0.14
0.17
0.06
0.20
0.05
B07
_011
6N
GC
2244
97.9
0375
04.
8511
119
67.6
0.09
5-0
.14
5.47
61.
840.
531.
380.
421.
070.
32B
07_0
119
NG
C22
4497
.906
250
4.95
111
1847
.60.
078
0.12
2.03
50.
680.
200.
460.
120.
370.
10B
07_0
147
NG
C22
4497
.920
833
4.91
333
1846
.80.
046
0.67
1.03
30.
460.
120.
240.
060.
180.
05B
07_0
152
NG
C22
4497
.922
083
4.76
722
2235
.80.
085
0.52
1.05
30.
500.
120.
440.
110.
380.
10B
07_0
180
NG
C22
4497
.932
917
5.04
917
2157
.50.
066
-0.4
51.
456
0.58
0.15
0.60
0.12
0.46
0.11
B07
_023
6N
GC
2244
97.9
5208
35.
0347
223
59.3
0.09
50.
031.
355
0.81
0.16
0.75
0.18
0.51
0.15
B07
_024
7N
GC
2244
97.9
5541
74.
9502
818
80.2
0.05
60.
332.
912
0.81
0.27
0.70
0.23
0.79
0.23
B07
_026
5N
GC
2244
97.9
6083
34.
9313
922
51.5
0.05
60.
421.
963
0.83
0.20
0.27
0.07
0.44
0.10
B07
_026
9N
GC
2244
97.9
6166
74.
9097
220
56.9
0.06
10.
961.
683
0.57
0.16
0.51
0.12
0.35
0.10
B07
_030
7N
GC
2244
97.9
7125
05.
0247
219
37.1
0.38
10.
455.
694
2.31
0.65
1.98
0.48
1.34
0.43
B07
_036
9N
GC
2244
97.9
8916
74.
8950
021
51.6
0.12
90.
081.
685
0.69
0.17
0.36
0.10
0.60
0.17
B07
_037
0N
GC
2244
97.9
8958
34.
9333
322
49.4
0.07
4-0
.22
3.62
61.
420.
360.
780.
200.
420.
11B
07_0
373
NG
C22
4497
.989
583
4.94
472
2849
.30.
090
0.72
4.20
31.
430.
420.
620.
170.
530.
14B
07_0
391
NG
C22
4497
.995
417
4.91
806
2147
.90.
054
0.36
1.49
50.
600.
150.
340.
080.
230.
07B
07_0
397
NG
C22
4497
.997
083
5.02
139
2062
.90.
053
0.54
2.00
30.
690.
190.
520.
150.
440.
11B
07_0
423
NG
C22
4498
.004
167
4.86
556
2552
.70.
060
0.38
1.77
50.
730.
200.
420.
110.
430.
10B
07_0
454
NG
C22
4498
.014
167
4.87
667
2371
.90.
053
0.17
2.54
21.
230.
270.
760.
210.
700.
18B
07_0
471
NG
C22
4498
.019
167
4.89
028
2149
.10.
089
0.43
1.22
30.
710.
160.
630.
150.
580.
13B
07_0
473
NG
C22
4498
.019
583
4.79
611
1753
.80.
081
0.08
2.06
50.
810.
210.
490.
140.
420.
12B
07_0
477
NG
C22
4498
.021
250
4.79
417
2143
.70.
032
-0.1
11.
416
0.46
0.14
0.41
0.10
0.20
0.04
B07
_049
4N
GC
2244
98.0
2458
34.
9513
923
58.8
0.03
80.
211.
155
0.51
0.12
0.34
0.08
0.25
0.07
B07
_049
8N
GC
2244
98.0
2500
04.
8419
424
61.7
0.04
1-0
.24
1.84
60.
610.
160.
360.
110.
430.
10B
07_0
507
NG
C22
4498
.027
083
4.79
861
2576
.50.
016
0.21
2.52
20.
960.
250.
850.
210.
730.
19B
07_0
511
NG
C22
4498
.027
917
4.92
528
2054
.50.
051
0.11
1.47
50.
760.
160.
280.
070.
320.
07B
07_0
530
NG
C22
4498
.032
500
4.88
833
1754
.20.
130
0.11
5.22
52.
190.
561.
180.
380.
870.
24B
07_0
539
NG
C22
4498
.035
833
4.69
000
2249
.30.
085
-1.1
01.
034
0.49
0.13
0.37
0.10
0.59
0.14
B07
_054
6N
GC
2244
98.0
3791
74.
8336
127
52.7
0.17
41.
142.
661
1.49
0.33
0.78
0.24
0.95
0.26
B07
_059
5N
GC
2244
98.0
5750
04.
9427
823
43.9
0.04
01.
092.
551
1.10
0.26
0.65
0.13
0.37
0.07
B07
_059
6N
GC
2244
98.0
5791
74.
8266
721
39.5
0.09
9-0
.04
1.08
60.
720.
150.
430.
110.
610.
13B
07_0
607
NG
C22
4498
.061
667
4.84
000
2133
.20.
137
-0.7
91.
184
0.49
0.14
0.37
0.10
0.54
0.14
B07
_064
2N
GC
2244
98.0
7333
34.
8855
619
37.7
0.05
50.
831.
113
0.55
0.13
0.26
0.06
0.23
0.06
B07
_065
6N
GC
2244
98.0
7958
34.
8427
826
53.9
0.08
50.
983.
233
1.77
0.41
0.78
0.18
0.67
0.14
B07
_065
9N
GC
2244
98.0
8041
74.
9594
421
44.5
0.05
30.
362.
095
1.11
0.23
0.86
0.21
0.29
0.07
B07
_068
4N
GC
2244
98.0
8708
34.
8611
129
66.6
0.12
9-0
.75
1.99
40.
930.
211.
010.
250.
990.
23B
07_0
691
NG
C22
4498
.089
583
4.84
083
2646
.20.
045
0.01
1.42
60.
840.
160.
250.
060.
250.
06B
07_0
696
NG
C22
4498
.092
500
4.64
250
2354
.00.
052
-0.6
91.
384
0.77
0.17
0.71
0.16
0.45
0.10
B07
_070
5N
GC
2244
98.0
9541
74.
8458
324
43.7
0.07
20.
601.
113
0.55
0.13
0.43
0.08
0.42
0.10
B07
_070
9N
GC
2244
98.0
9666
75.
0158
323
46.7
0.07
90.
081.
255
0.60
0.14
0.39
0.10
0.36
0.10
B07
_078
8N
GC
2244
98.1
3166
74.
9236
122
46.7
0.04
90.
801.
783
0.85
0.19
0.34
0.08
0.31
0.07
B07
_079
5N
GC
2244
98.1
3625
04.
7488
924
58.3
0.04
71.
201.
421
0.72
0.18
0.47
0.08
0.46
0.09
Con
tinue
don
next
page
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
26 Froebrich et al.
Tabl
eA
1–
cont
inue
dfr
ompr
evio
uspa
geSo
urce
Nam
eR
egio
nR
AD
EC
Nvar
αrm
sM
SG
∆V
σV
∆R
σR
∆I
σI
(J20
00)[
deg]
[deg
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
[mag
][m
ag]
B07
_085
1N
GC
2244
98.1
5875
04.
6811
118
44.1
0.02
0-0
.12
1.18
60.
540.
130.
150.
040.
150.
03B
07_0
877
NG
C22
4498
.169
583
4.69
028
2240
.60.
075
-0.2
11.
066
0.56
0.12
0.35
0.08
0.30
0.08
B07
_087
8N
GC
2244
98.1
7000
04.
7727
820
42.2
0.03
1-0
.72
1.26
40.
520.
130.
180.
050.
200.
04B
07_0
903
NG
C22
4498
.181
667
4.90
500
2147
.10.
082
-0.0
01.
566
0.65
0.16
0.46
0.09
0.43
0.10
B07
_091
3N
GC
2244
98.1
8458
34.
8547
224
56.5
0.05
1-0
.28
1.23
60.
620.
150.
460.
100.
310.
08B
07_0
917
NG
C22
4498
.187
917
4.75
639
1855
.60.
057
-0.1
41.
786
0.88
0.20
0.54
0.14
0.46
0.11
B07
_101
2N
GC
2244
98.2
6208
35.
0019
421
38.8
0.04
80.
031.
116
0.49
0.12
0.31
0.08
0.22
0.05
B07
_101
6N
GC
2244
98.2
6708
34.
7983
320
47.0
0.04
70.
251.
325
0.68
0.15
0.47
0.11
0.32
0.07
B07
_108
1N
GC
2244
98.3
2041
74.
8000
022
55.0
0.05
50.
371.
853
0.82
0.19
0.76
0.19
0.37
0.10
Var
iabl
e_V
_98.
0789
79_4
.987
689
NG
C22
4498
.078
750
4.98
750
2352
.50.
071
-0.1
13.
086
1.15
0.32
1.94
0.51
0.44
0.12
Var
iabl
e_V
_98.
0837
17_4
.990
977
NG
C22
4498
.083
333
4.99
083
1951
.60.
051
0.34
1.52
50.
810.
171.
690.
410.
430.
09V
aria
ble_
V_9
8.23
2353
_5.1
5882
5N
GC
2244
98.2
3208
35.
1586
123
47.2
0.07
90.
461.
873
0.73
0.19
0.80
0.21
0.40
0.10
Var
iabl
e_V
_98.
0728
53_5
.332
977
NG
C22
4498
.072
500
5.33
278
2075
.90.
052
0.44
2.10
30.
610.
200.
660.
190.
600.
18V
aria
ble_
V_9
7.67
2302
_4.9
2139
2N
GC
2244
97.6
7208
34.
9213
919
54.0
0.14
30.
193.
015
0.99
0.29
1.81
0.45
0.76
0.20
Var
iabl
e_R
_97.
5555
57_4
.934
767
NG
C22
4497
.555
417
4.93
472
3074
.60.
034
0.01
1.55
20.
540.
150.
590.
140.
400.
12V
aria
ble_
R_9
7.88
1714
_5.1
6110
2N
GC
2244
97.8
8166
75.
1608
319
47.2
0.03
0-0
.12
2.49
60.
940.
250.
490.
160.
160.
04V
aria
ble_
R_9
7.84
1774
_5.1
5631
6N
GC
2244
97.8
4166
75.
1561
123
44.9
0.05
60.
721.
133
0.48
0.12
0.55
0.17
0.30
0.07
Var
iabl
e_I_
97.7
5560
8_4.
9363
05N
GC
2244
97.7
5541
74.
9361
124
74.8
0.01
41.
251.
661
0.70
0.21
0.66
0.19
0.53
0.16
Var
iabl
e_I_
97.6
5500
6_4.
9007
79N
GC
2244
97.6
5500
04.
9005
617
69.1
0.05
10.
903.
141
1.03
0.29
0.92
0.24
0.67
0.20
Var
iabl
e_I_
97.7
0332
3_4.
8755
70N
GC
2244
97.7
0291
74.
8755
618
70.3
0.12
5-0
.27
2.00
60.
760.
202.
000.
500.
900.
23
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)