manufacturing extension partnership “transforming u.s. manufacturing -- challenges and...
TRANSCRIPT
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
“Transforming U.S. Manufacturing -- Challenges and Opportunities”Thursday, April 9, 2015
Presentation to the NACFAM’s Annual Conference & AMLF MeetingPhillip Singerman, PhDAssociate Director for Innovation and Industry ServicesActing Director, Manufacturing Extension Partnership
Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) State Based Competitions – 2015
2U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
MEP Strategic Plan
3
MISSIONTo enhance the productivity and technological performance of U.S. manufacturing.
ROLEMEP ‘s state and regional centers facilitate and accelerate the transfer of manufacturing technology in partnership with industry, universities and educational institutions, state governments, and NIST and other federal research laboratories and agencies.
• National program with at least one center in every state and Puerto Rico.
• Federal/state, public-private partnership with local flexibility.
• Cost share policy that matches federal investment with state and private sector investment.
• Market driven program that responds to the needs of private sector manufacturers.
• Leverage partnering expertise as a strategic advantage.
• Local knowledge of, focus on, and access to manufacturers.
PROGRAMMATIC STRENGTHS:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
The MEP Program in Short
MEP System Budget$130 Million Federal Budget with Cost Share Requirements for Centers
Global Competitiveness Program was created by the 1988 Omnibus Trade And Competitive Act
Emphasis on PerformanceProgram and center performance based upon impact of center services on client firm
Program Started in 1988At least one center in all 50 states by 1996
National NetworkSystem of Centers serving Manufacturers in each State.
Partnership ModelFederal, Stateand Industry
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP 4
The National Network
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP 5
MEP Client Impacts
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
N = 6,088
Manufacturers Surveyed in FY 2014
6
MEP State Competition – What and Why?• The program is undergoing a multi-year effort to conduct a full
and open competition for MEP centers older than 10 years.• Objective is to optimize the federal investment and allocate
additional funds to areas with higher concentration of manufacturers.
• Will be able to expand the range of services offered with an emphasis on very small, rural and start-up manufacturers.
• MEP just announced first 10 award recipients of competition in Feb 2015. Press release can be found http://nist.gov/mep/awards-support-manufacturing.cfm
• Second round of the competition for 12 states was announced March 2015. Proposals are due June 1, 2015.
7U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
H.R. 5035 – NIST Reauthorization Act of 2014
“To reauthorize the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and for other purposes” passed the House on July 22, 2014, which provided that if a recipient has received a Center award for 10 consecutive years, then the Director shall conduct a competition to select a Center operator. Current Centers in good standing are eligible.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP 8
Government Accountability Office (March 2014)
• MEP: “Most Federal Spending Directly Supports Work with Manufacturers, but Distribution Could Be Improved”
• What GAO Recommends:– “GAO recommends that Commerce’s spending on cooperative
agreement awards be revised to account for variations across service areas in demand for program services and in MEP centers’ cost of providing services. Commerce agreed with GAO’s recommendation.”
9U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
The Budget for Fiscal Year 2016• National Institute of Standards and Technology: Industrial
Technology Services/Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP)…
– “In FY 2013, MEP began a broad based strategic planning process and developed an operational reform agenda intended to optimize program effectiveness, enhance administrative efficiency, and provide greater financial accountability. In FY 2014, MEP initiated a reform of the national system of MEP Centers through a carefully planned, systematic, multiyear series of full and open competitions. These re-competition efforts are ongoing and will continue in FY 2016.”
10U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Round 1 Competition FundingMEP Center Location and Assigned Geographical Service Area (by State)
Annual Federal Funding for Each Year of the Award
Total Federal Funding for 5 Year Award Period
Colorado $1,668,359 $8,341,795
Connecticut $1,476,247 $7,381,235
Indiana $2,758,688 $13,793,440
Michigan $4,229,175 $21,145,875
New Hampshire $628,176 $3,140,880
North Carolina $3,036,183 $15,180,915
Oregon $1,792,029 $8,960,145
Tennessee $1,976,348 $9,881,740
Texas $6,700,881 $33,504,405
Virginia $1,722,571 $8,612,855
11U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Round 2 Competition FundingMEP Center Location and Assigned Geographical Service Area (by State)
Annual Federal Funding for Each Year of the Award
Total Federal Funding for 5 Year Award Period
Alaska $500,000 $2,500,000
Idaho $640,236 $3,201,180
Illinois $5,029,910 $25,149,550
Minnesota $2,653,649 $13,268,245
New Jersey $2,814,432 $14,072,160
New York $5,985,194 $29,925,970
Ohio $5,246,822 $26,234,110
Oklahoma $1,309,080 $6,545,400
Utah $1,147,573 $5,737,865
Washington $2,534,872 $12,674,360
West Virginia $500,000 $2,500,000
Wisconsin $3,250,792 $16,253,960
12U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Funding Opportunity Title: Award Competitions for Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Centers in the States of Alaska, Idaho, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin
• NIST invites applications from eligible organizations in connection with NIST’s funding up to twelve (12) separate MEP cooperative agreements for the operation of an MEP Center in the designated States’ service areas and in the funding amounts identified in the Federal Funding Opportunity - http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-state-competitions-02.cfm
13
MEP State Competition
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Benefits to Competition• Opportunity to realign MEP center activities with State
economic development strategies• Resetting of State funding levels to reflect the regional
importance of manufacturing and the national distribution of manufacturing activities
• Reduction and simplification of reporting requirements• Five year awards reducing the annual paperwork burden• Immediate readjustment of the local cost share from 2:1 to
1:1
14U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Additional Information• Proposals due June 1, 2015• Informational webinars for interested applicants
– March 30th 2:00pm; April 13th 2:30pm; April 16th 1:00pm– Email [email protected] to register for a webinar– Webinar recordings and presentations will be made
available on the MEP website.
• For more information http://nist.gov/mep/ffo-state-competitions-02.cfm
15U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
Misperception - Productivity on Employment
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
10
12
14
16
18
20
1965 - Jan 1975 - Jan 1985 - Jan 1995 - Jan 2005 - Jan
Millions
Gray bars indicate
recessions
Rising Productivity does not create employment losses1965 – 2000 : US Mfg output rises 6x, stable employment
BACKGROUND
Challenge: US losing leadershipin Advanced Products
U.S. Trade Balance for Advanced Technology Products
+ 40
+ 20
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100
US Trade BalanceAdvanced Technology
Products($ Billion)
BACKGROUND
PCAST: The independent basis of NNMI
PCAST 2011Recommends Advanced
Manufacturing Initiative as national innovation policy
PCAST 2012Recommends Manufacturing
Innovation Institutes to address key market failure
PCAST 2014Recommends strong, collaborative
network of Manufacturing Innovation Institutes
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
The “Scale-up” Gap or Missing Middle
Basic R&D Commercialization
Common termsThe “valley of death”
The “missing Bell Labs”The “industrial commons”
Initial Network Proposed
• President asks Congress to authorize initial network of up to 15 Manufacturing Innovation Institutes
• President directs Agencies to work together on Pilot Institute, while designing Institutes with input from Industry and Academia
“Sparking this network of innovation across the country, it will create jobs and will keep America leading in manufacturing…" President Obama, March 9, 2012
The Institute DesignCreating the space for Industry & Academia to collaborate
White House ReportNNMI Framework Design
January 2013
23Partnership: Industry – Academia – Government
Working better, together to create transformational technologies and build new products and industries
Institute Major Activities
Institute
Applied Research & Demo projects for • reducing cost/risk on
commercializing new tech.• Solving pre-competitive industrial
problems
Tech Integration - Development of innovative methodologies and practices for supply chain integration Small/Medium Enterprises
• Engagement with small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises (SMEs).
Education, technical skills and Workforce development
Education and training at all levels for workforce development
Building the Network:Network Status and FY16 Plans
25
Smart Mfg.
Flex. Hybrid Electronics
America MakesAdditive Mfg.
Youngstown, OH
PowerAmericaPower Electronics
Raleigh, NC
LIFTLight/Modern Metals
Detroit, MI
IACMIAdv. Composites
Knoxville, TN
DMDIIDigital Mfg.Chicago, IL
FORTHCOMING FY15
New Institutes Planned for FY16:
Full Network Goal: 45 regional hubs
Open topic competition – addressing “white space” between mission agency topics
Selected topic competitions supporting Agency mission – using agency authorities and budgets
FY17-26 – central fund proposed for remaining institutes, via open topic process
TopicTBA
Integrated Photonics
The First Pilot Manufacturing Innovation InstituteAdditive Manufacturing/3D Printing – Youngstown OH
Prime Awardee: National Center for Defense Manufacturing and Machining
• Initial $30M federal investment matched by $40M industry, state/local
• Strong leveraging of equipment, existing resources• Strong business development• Tiered membership-based model, low cost to small
business and nonprofits
• Now at $50M federal, $60M co-invested• OVER 100 Participating partners!
2nd Pilot Institute: Next Generation Power Electronics
Mission: Develop advanced manufacturing processes that will enable large-scale production of wide bandgap semiconductors, which allow power electronics components to be smaller, faster and more efficient than silicon.
President ObamaNorth Carolina State University, January 15, 2014
Lead: North Carolina State UniversityHub Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Poised to revolutionize the energy efficiency of power control and
conversion
$70M public investment, $70M match
• 17 Industry Partners• 5 Universities• 3 Labs and Other Organizations
3rd Pilot Institute: Digital Manufacturing & Design Innovation
Mission: Establish a state-of-the-art proving ground that links IT tools, standards, models, sensors, controls, practices and skills, and transition these tools to the U.S. design & manufacturing base for full-scale application
Lead: UI LabsHub location: Chicago, Illinois• 41 Companies• 23 Universities and Labs• 9 Other Organizations
$70M public investment, $105M match
4th Pilot Institute:Lightweight and Modern Metals
Mission: Provide the National focus on expanding US competitiveness and innovation , and facilitating the transition of these capabilities and new technologies to the industrial base for full-scale application.
Lead: EWIHub location: Detroit, MichiganRegional location: I-75 Corridor
• 34 Industry Partners• 9 Universities and Labs• 17 Other Organizations
Positioned to expand the US Industrial base for new products and technologies for commercial and USG demands that utilize new, lightweight
high-performing metals
$70M public investment, $70M match
50% Lower cost
Using 75% Less Energy
And reuse or recycle >95% of
the material
ObjectiveDevelop and demonstrate innovative technologies that will, within 10 years, make game-changing advanced fiber-reinforced polymer composites. The Institute’s negotiation is led by University of Tennessee-Knoxville. The full team includes: 57 Companies, 15 Universities and Laboratories, 14 Other Entities, w/ 36 Consortia Members.
Application Estimated Current CFC Cost
Institute CFC Cost Reduction Target
(2018)88
CFC Ultimate Cost Target (2024)
CFC Tensile Strength CFC Stiffness
Production Volume
Cycle Time
Vehicles(Body Structures)
$26-33/kg >35%<$11/kg by 2025
~60%0.85GPa (123ksi) 96GPa (14Msi)
100,000 units/yr <3min cycle time
(carbon)<5min cycle time
(glass)
Wind (Blades)
$26/kg >25%$17/kg ~35%
1.903 GPA (276ksi)
134GPa (19.4Msi)10,000 units/yr (at
>60m length blades)
Compressed Gas Storage (700 bar –
Type IV)$20-25/kg >30%
$10-15/kg~50%
2.55 GPa (370ksi) 135 GPa (20Msi)500,000 units/yr
(carbon fiber)
5th Pilot Institute: Selected, Negotiations UnderwayAdvanced Composites Manufacturing
$70M Federal + > than $180 Non-Federal investment over five years. This National institute
has 6 State partners CO, IN, KY, MI, OH, TN with (Over 2:1 cost share) Source: www.iacmi.org
6th Pilot Institute Funding Opportunity Integrated Photonics Manufacturing Innovation Institute
More than $100M federal investment over five years
ObjectiveDevelop and demonstrate innovative technologies for:• Ultra high-speed transmission of signals for the
internet and telecommunications • New high-performance information-processing
systems and computing• Sensors and imaging enabling dramatic medical
advances in diagnostics, treatment, and gene sequencing
All these developments will require cross-cutting disciplines of design,
manufacturing, packaging, reliability and testing.
This Institute will focus on developing an end-to-end photonics ‘ecosystem’ in the U.S., including domestic foundry access, integrated design tools, automated packaging, assembly and test, and workforce development.
Reprinted with permission from Intel Corp
“In my State of the Union Address, I asked Congress to build on a successful pilot program and create 15 manufacturing innovation institutes that connect businesses, universities, and federal agencies to turn communities left behind by global competition into global centers of high-tech jobs.
“Today, I’m asking Congress to build on the bipartisan support for this idea and triple that number to 45 – creating a network of these hubs and guaranteeing that the next revolution in manufacturing is ‘Made in America.’”
- July 30, 2013
AP Photo/Susan Walsh
The President’s Vision – Network of 45 Institutes
NNMI Authorized: Revitalize American Manufacturing & Innovation Act
118 bipartisan RAMI Bill Sponsors
December 16, 2014 – Signed By President Obama
September 15, 2014 – Passed House
100 Cosponsors (51D, 49R)
December 11, 2014 – Passed Senate with 2015
Appropriations18 Cosponsors (10D, 7R, 1I)
Bipartisan Momentum Supporting NNMI Passage
Sen. Sherrod BrownD Ohio
Sen. Roy BluntR Missouri
Rep. Tom ReedR NY-23
Rep. Joe KennedyD MA-4
RAMI and Commerce/NIST
Call to Action: RAMI calls upon the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and NIST to establish:
1. The “Network for Manufacturing Innovation Program” (Network function) - to convene and support a network of Institutes
2. New “Centers for Manufacturing Innovation” (Institutes) - using an open topic, open competition process
3. The National Program Office at NIST - to oversee and carry out the program (coordination, network support, and reporting)
MEP and NNMI IMIs Revitalize American Manufacturing and Innovation Act of
2014 / Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, pg 241: “The Secretary shall ensure that the National Program
Office incorporates the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership into Program planning to ensure that the results of the Program reach small and medium-sized entities.”
AMP 2.0 Report called for major MEP role, including: Support for MEP as an intermediary to help small-to-midsize manufacturers
leverage manufacturing technologies; & to assist small-to-midsize manufacturers with market entry support and scale-up
Support to ensure that the MEP becomes a major “tool in the NNMI toolbox”
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY • MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP
35
NNMI FY 2016 Budget Request
Continues operations for previously funded institutes. Through FY 2015, funding was provided to DOE and DOD to initiate nine institutes.
Requests over $350 million for seven new institutes. Funds are requested in the discretionary budgets of DOD (1), DOE (2), USDA (2),
and DOC (2).
Includes a mandatory proposal to build out the full Network of 45 institutes over ten years $1.9B mandatory request with spending beginning in FY2017
For DOC specifically, the Budget proposes $150M for two NNMI Institutes on industry-proposed technologies and NNMI Network coordination
Conduct open competitions for two DOC-funded institutes on industry-proposed topics ($140M) To be awarded in CY 2016 through cooperative
agreements Two institutes each with $70M in federal funding
matched by $70M or more in private funding Winning public-private consortia would bring together
leading manufacturers, universities, and workforce non-profits
Technology topics chosen by industry Support the Network of Institutes ($10M)
Working with DOD, DOE, NASA, and NSF, convene and support the network of institutes to ensure sharing of best practices
Facilitate stakeholder access nationwide across institutes
Create long-term public-private governance structure and reporting mechanisms
Transform innovative technology into manufacturing capability
NNMI Hill Day September 18, 2014
NIST FY16 Plans
Industry-proposed Institutes at NIST• NIST institutes can address manufacturing “white space” technologies
proposed by industry that cannot currently be covered by other USG missions NIST issued RFI soliciting private sector input that generated 135
topics, many of which were outside of the energy and defense sectors
Key focus of the NNMI from its conception was the critical linkage between Innovation and Manufacturing. NIST is the only Federal Agency focused solely on supporting
technological innovation across the board
NIST support for manufacturing cuts across all NIST programs (Labs, MEP, AMTech, BPEP, AMNPO) Critical mass of technical expertise Non regulatory Mission is industry focused (not tied to a USG need) Works effectively in partnership with industry, academia, and other
organizations.
Thank you
For questions or comments, please contact the Advanced Manufacturing National Program Office
301-975-2830
Unless otherwise labeled, images are courtesy of The White House, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Shutterstock