managing threatening & disruptive behaviors: part 1 understanding & assessing the threat...
TRANSCRIPT
Managing Threatening & Disruptive Behaviors: Part 1
Understanding & Assessing the Threat
Gene Deisinger, Ph.D.Commander, Special Operations Unit
Iowa State University Police
Presented for the:Midwest Association of
Student Financial Aid AdministratorsOctober 17, 2006
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 2
Gene Deisinger, Ph.D.
Ph.D., Counseling Psychology; Licensed Psychologist; Certified Health Service Provider in Psychology; Certified Peace Officer; Founding member, Iowa State University
Critical Incident Response Team Hostage / Crisis Negotiator; Crisis Intervention Team Leader;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 3
Workplace Homicide
551
927
632609
643677
651
714
860
103610801074
1044
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 4
Workplace Assaults
100000
300000
500000
700000
900000
1100000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Aggravated Simple
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 5
Violence in the Workplace
Nationally Each Year (10 year Average): 807 employees killed; 1.75 million employees assaulted;
1.3 million simple assaults.325,000 aggravated assaults.36,500 sexual assaults.
5-7 million employees threatened; 12-15 million employees harassed.
Sources: Study by Northwestern National Life Insurance Company and
The Bureau of Justice Statistics
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 6
Violence Defined
An intentional act of aggression directed against another person that results in, or is likely to result in, physical injury.
- J. Reid Meloy (2000)
Violence Risk and Threat Assessment
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 7
On-Campus Violence
Type of Violence 2002 2003 2004Murder 23 9 15Forcible Sex 2350 2609 2649Robbery 2193 2123 2060Aggravated Assault 3070 3026 3009Arson 1103 1043 1059Injurious Hate Crimes 80 54 30Illegal Weapon Arrests 1243 1199 1354
Source: US Dept. of Education Office of Post-Secondary Education
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 8
Campus Violence
Violent Acts Experienced PercentArgument / Fight 32Hurt / Injured 16Threats of Violence 11Ethnic Harassment 6Physical Violence 5Forced Sexual Touching 5Unwanted Sexual Intercourse 4Theft Involving Force / Threat 2
Source: 2000 Core Survey of 55,026 undergraduate students
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 9
Campus Violence
Experience While Drinking PercentArgument / Fight 31Hurt / Injured 14Threats of Violence 34Ethnic Harassment 15Physical Violence 38Forced Sexual Touching 40Unwanted Sexual Intercourse 36Theft Involving Force / Threat 24
Source: 2004 Core Institute Survey of undergraduate students
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 10
Mental Health on Campus
Directors Perceiving Increase in: PercentRelationship Violence 41Severe Psychological Problems 78Sexual Assault on Campus 31Self-Injury 39Alcohol Problems 48Other Drug Problems 39
Source: 2000 University Counseling Center Director’s Survey (N=248)
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 11
Mental Health on Campus
Centers Dealing With: PercentObsessive Pursuit Cases 65Hospitalization of Student 91Student Suicide 29Client Suicide 10Warned 3rd Party @ Suicidal Student 73Warned 3rd Party @ Danger to Others 24
Source: 2000 University Counseling Center Director’s Survey (N=248)
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 12
Violence in the Workplace
Violence can occur among:
Supervisors; Employees/staff; Customers; Vendors; or Other community members.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 13
Workplace Violence - Types
Type I: Criminal Intent;
Type II: Customer / Client;
Type III: Worker-on-Worker;
Type IV: Personal Relationship.
Source: University of Iowa, Injury Prevention Research Center (2001)
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 14
Workplace Violence - Types
Type I – Criminal IntentSubject has no legitimate relationship to
the institution or its employees;Primary motive is theft;Deadly weapon often involved;Greatest risk involves workers who:
–Exchange cash;–Work late night/early morning hours, or;–Work alone.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 15
Workplace Violence - Types
Type II – Customer / Client The perpetrator has a legitimate
relationship with the organization; Perpetrator becomes violent while being
served; This category includes customers,
clients, patients, students, vendors, etc.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 16
Workplace Violence - Types
Type III – Worker-on-Worker The perpetrator is a current or past
employee; The perpetrator threatens or attacks
fellow past or present employees; May be seeking revenge for what is
perceived as unfair treatment; Includes employees, supervisors, and
managers.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 17
Workplace Violence - Types
Type IV – Personal Relationship Perpetrator usually has no legitimate
relationship with institution; Perpetrator has (or has had) a personal
relationship with the intended victim; May involve a current or former spouse,
lover, relative, friend, or acquaintance; Often motivated by perceived difficulties
in the relationship.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 18
Violence in the Workplace
13,000 acts of violence against women in the workplace are committed annually by current or former male partners.
Homicide is the leading cause of death for women in the workplace.
Source: Northwestern National Life Insurance Company
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 19
Violence in the Workplace
30% of workplace assaults are committed by co-workers.
However, fewer than 7% of workplace homicides are committed by co-workers.
Sources: Northwestern National Life Insurance Company;University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 20
Who Commits Workplace Violence?
80% committed by males; 40% committed by complete strangers; 35% committed by casual acquaintances; 19% by individuals well known to victim; 1% by relatives of the victim.
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 21
Results of Violence at Work
Psychological impairment; Property damage and theft; Reduced productivity; Diversion of management resources; Increased security costs; Increased personnel costs; Increased worker’s compensation costs; Employer liability.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 22
Costs of Workplace Violence
Approximately 500,000 employees miss 1.75 million days of work annually;3.5 days lost per worker/per incident;
$55 million in lost wages; $180 million in lost time and productivity; $13 billion in medical costs/year.
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 23
Legal Issues for Supervisors
Respondeat Superior – holds employers liable for the actions of their employees.
If the employer knows or should know of information indicating that a person
is at risk for committing violence,the employer is responsible
for any violent acts that person commits.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 24
Legal Issues for Supervisors
Negligent Hiring & Retention - an employer has a duty to maintain the health, safety,
and welfare of the workplace.
If employer knows, or should have known, of harmful characteristics
and hires (or retains)the person in employment anyway,
the employer is responsible for any harm the person causes.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 25
Legal Issues for Supervisors
Duty to Warn / Protect - if an employer has information that leads him or her to
believe violence may occur, the employer must take action to warn or
protect the potential victim.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 26
Key Points about Violence
Violence (dangerousness) is a DYNAMIC process not a static
event or a state of being.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 27
Individual Profile
Male (80+%); White (75%) / Majority race (85%+); Age: Social violence: 15-24
School violence: 15-17Workplace violence: 30-45Stalking violence: 35-40
Military / Weapons experience; Power & control oriented; Obsessed / Identifies with violence.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 28
Key Points about Violence
Workplace violence offender profiles that are based on
demographic or static variablesare remarkably accurate,
and utterly worthless.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 29
Mode of Violence: Affective
Intense emotion and expressiveness; Violence is reactive and immediate; Violence against perceived threats; Goal is threat reduction (homeostasis); Rapid displacement of target; Reactions are time limited; Primarily emotional and defensive; Heightened and diffuse awareness.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 30
Mode of Violence: Predatory
Minimal emotion or expression; Violence is planned and purposeful; Violence is targeted; Goal are variable; Minimal displacement of target; Not time limited; Often preceded by private ritual; Primarily cognitive / attack; Heightened and focused awareness;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 31
Key Points about Violence
Violence is the product of an interaction among three factors:
The individual who takes violent action; A setting that facilitates or permits
violence, or does not discourage it; and, Triggering conditions that lead the
subject to see violence as an option.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 32
Individual Warning Signs
Carrying or brandishing a weapon; Recently acquiring weapons; Fascination with weapons; Attempts to harm self / cries for help; Following or approaching targets; Bizarre or aggressive behavior; Desperation or reactivity;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 33
Individual Warning Signs
Unexplained increase in absenteeism Decreased attention to personal hygiene; Resistance to change or reasonable limits. Over reaction to changes in policies or
procedures; Repeated violations of policies – pushes
limits; Personalizes decisions.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 34
Individual Warning Signs
Statements indicating approval of the use of violence to resolve a problem;
Statements indicating identification with perpetrators of workplace violence;
Unusual interest in targets; Unusual interests in security; Threats of violence; Inappropriate communication with or about
targets.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 35
Individual Warning Signs
Substance use (alcohol, stimulants); Extreme changes in behavior; Numerous conflicts with others; Poor problem-solving; Do not learn effectively from past behavior; Depressed mood / withdrawal; Paranoia / distrust;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 36
Inappropriate Communications
Extreme admiration or affection; A special, shared history or destiny; Admonishments to change lifestyle; Religious/historical themes; Content that is disjointed, sinister or bizarre; The recipient being someone else; Mental illness: psychiatric care, medication;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 37
Inappropriate Communications
Threats of violence; Death, suicide, weapons, destruction, etc; Persons who have been attacked; Persons who have carried out attacks; Unpaid debts or entitlements; Knowledge of Security:
Guards, access, keys, work practices; Stalking:
Surveillance, knowledge of activities;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 38
Threats
DirectI’m gonna go home, get my shotgunand come back here and blow your f---in’ head off.
Indirect / VeiledThat guy over in Iowa City had the right idea about how to handle people that got in his way.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 39
Threats
SpecificI am going to kill you.
ConditionalIf you don’t get me the aid I need, I am going to kill you;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 40
Threats
First-PersonI am going to make you regret that decision.
Third-PartyMy husband told me to tell you that you better watch out, cause he is going to take care of you for treating me like this.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 41
Evaluating Threats
Threats may increase, decrease or have no relationship to violence
Some subjects who make threats ultimately act on them;
Most subjects never act on threats. Note: 68% - 90% false positive rate;
Many subjects who commit acts of violence never make threats.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 42
Evaluating Threats
Specificity:Time;Target;Place;Means;Motive;
Consistency; Plausibility; Emotionality; Relationship between persons.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 43
Evaluating Threats
At eight o’clock tomorrow morning, I am going to shoot that bastard in financial aid.
That is when he’s in his office by himself. I have thought about this a lot
and he needs to pay. I am sick and tired of the way he lords over
decent people he is supposed to help. A few 9mm rounds in the faceought to teach him the lesson.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 44
Dealing with Threats
Take threats seriously, but be careful not to over-react.
Be sure to investigate and follow-up on credible threats.
Consider threats in the appropriate context. Document your findings and actions. Notify Police / Security of concerns.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 45
Inhibitors to Violence
Where inhibitors outnumber risk-factors, violence is unlikely.
Interpersonal skills; Connection to others; Financial support systems; Mental health resources (?); Reputation; Coping skills; Perceived alternatives; Healthy family dynamics/involvement.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 46
High-Risk Work Settings
Chronic unresolved conflict; High volume of complaints; High rate of injuries; High perceived levels of stress; Authoritarian attitudes; Toleration of aggressive interactions; Unpleasant physical environment Persistent disrespect / devaluing.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 47
High-Risk Campus Settings
Detached / isolated staff or students; Inequitable discipline; Inflexibility; Pecking order/cliques supported; Code of silence; Unsupervised computer / lab access; Copycat effect; Authoritarian & controlling attitudes;
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 48
Situational Risk Factors
Exchange of money with the public; Work alone or in small numbers; Work late night or early morning; Work in high crime areas; Guard valuable property or possessions; Work in accessible community settings;
(e.g. taxi drivers, retail clerks, police).
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 49
Situational Risk Factors
Work where alcohol or drugs are dispensed; High exposure to unstable or volatile
persons - (e.g. health care, social services, criminal justice settings);
Position involves deciding on benefits, or controlling a person’s future, well-being or freedom.
(Source: NIOSH)
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 50
Triggering Events
Loss (real, perceived, or anticipated)Job or income;Loss of status;Significant other;
Perceived rejection; Perceived injustice; Ostracized by others; Health problems; Violation of a court order.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 51
Key Points About Violence
Violence is a process, as well as an act.
Careful analysis of violent incidents shows that violent acts are usually the culmination of long-developing, identifiable, trails of problems, conflicts, disputes, and failures.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 52
Key Points About Violence
Most (over 75%) consider, plan, and prepare before engaging in violent behavior;
Most (over 75%) discuss their plans with others before the attack.
Identification of the perpetrators “attack-related” behaviors is critical.
Perpetrators of violence engagein a process of escalation.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 53
The Process of Violence
Attack-Related Behaviors:
Ideation
Planning
Preparation
Implementation
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 54
Key Points about Violence
Dangerousness is not a permanent state of being nor solely an attribute of a person.
Dangerousness is situational & based on:
Justification;
Alternatives;
Consequences; and
Ability. Source: Gavin de Becker
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 55
TAM Process: Assessment
Systematic approach to: Identify subject(s); Identify target(s); Determine risk of violence; Identify potential management strategies.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 56
Why a Systematic Approach?
Provides a legally defendable position: Ensures fairness; Ensures consistency;
Ensures thoroughness.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 57
TAM Process: Management
Implement plan to diminish risk; Decrease access to target; Maintain channel of communication; De-escalate subject; or, Contain or control subject.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 58
Key Points about Violence
Victims are much more interested in THREAT MANAGEMENT than in
Threat Assessment.
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 59
Key Points About Violence
Involves a spectrum of behavior; Is a dynamic and situational process; Results from the interaction of factors; Behavior is influenced by environment; Is best understand within a context; People exhibit multiple warning signs; Trust your intuition until proven wrong!
© Gene Deisinger, Ph.D. October, 2006 Slide: 60
For More Information:
Gene Deisinger, Ph.D.Commander, Special Operations Unit
Iowa State University PoliceRoom 168, Armory Building
Ames, IA 50011
Phone: 515-294 - 4529
Email: [email protected]