managing the epidemic of ckd the uk model - nephro … · managing the epidemic of ckd the uk model...

37
Managing the Epidemic of CKD The UK Model Dr Donal O’Donoghue National Clinical Director for Kidney Care Actualités Néphrologiques Jean Hamburger Hôpital Necker, Paris 29 April 2008

Upload: dokiet

Post on 06-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Managing the Epidemic of CKDThe UK Model

Dr Donal O’DonoghueNational Clinical Director for Kidney Care

Actualités Néphrologiques Jean HamburgerHôpital Necker, Paris

29 April 2008

UK Modality Trends 1982 – December 2006

UK Renal Registry 10th Annual Report 2007

Timely Vascular Access

Standard 3“All children, young people and adults with established renal failure are to have timely and appropriate surgery for permanent vascular or peritoneal dialysis access, which is monitored and maintained to achieve its maximum longevity.”

Accelerated processes for Acute Uraemic Accelerated processes for Acute Uraemic EmergenciesEmergencies

• Prevention and detection of early CKD• A patient centred service that supports the

person in managing their condition to achieve the best possible quality of life

• Minimising the consequences of CKD• Prompt identification of AKI• Preparation and choice for RRT

National Service Framework for Renal Services 2004-5

National Service Framework Standards

• People given timely evaluation of prognosis and information about choices and end of life care based on agreed palliative care plan

• Those likely to benefit to be transplant listed

• Timely surgery for access• Dialysis designed around individual needs

National Service Framework for Renal Services 2004-5

National Service Framework Standards

Provision and commissioning of kidney care

EOL Care

Supportive & palliative care

Modified from Levey AS et Al . KI 2005:2089-2100

Public HealthPrimary Care

Specialist Kidney Care

Vascular Risk Assessment and Management

Vascular Risk Assessment and Management

Kidney Disease 2006St

age

of K

idne

y D

isea

se

90 460

60

6

380

60

15

30

(GFR

)(G

FR)

11

22

33

44

55

Stag

e of

Kid

ney

Dis

ease

90 460

60

6

380

60

15

30

(GFR

)(G

FR)

11

22

33

44

55

90 460

60

6

380

60

15

30

(GFR

)(G

FR)

11

22

33

44

55SM

R

Age (years)John et al. AJKD 2004;43(5):825–35

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

< 60 60 - 69 70 - 79 > 80

SMR

Age (years)John et al. AJKD 2004;43(5):825–35

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

< 60 60 - 69 70 - 79 > 80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

-2000 -1750 -1500 -1250 -1000 -750 -500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000

Referral time (days)

GFR

(mls

/min

)

=Pre referral slope=Post referral slope

Jones C et al Renal Association 2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

-2000 -1750 -1500 -1250 -1000 -750 -500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000

Referral time (days)

GFR

(mls

/min

)

=Pre referral slope=Post referral slope

Jones C et al Renal Association 2004

Common Harmful TreatableO’Donoghue DJ 2004

+ / -

+ / -

+ / -

+ / -

+ / -

+ / -

Proteinuria

<15 (or dialysis)Kidney failure5

15-29Severe ↓GFR4

GFR < 60 ml/min for ≥3 months ±kidney damage

45-59

30-44

Moderate ↓GFR

Moderate ↓GFR

3A

3B

60-89Kidney damage, mild ↓GFR2

Kidney damage for ≥3 months

≥90Kidney damage, N or ↑GFR1

QualifierGFRDescriptionStage

Edinburgh Consensus Conference February 2007

Classification of CKD 2007

SCr 120, eGFR 30 ml/min SCr 120, eGFR 130 ml/min

eGFR = % Kidney Function

0

20

40

60

80

100

ReciprocalSCr

Cockroft-Gault

24-HourCreatinineClearance

ReciprocalSCr [C]

Cockroft-Gault [C]

24-HourCreatinineClearance

[C]

MDRD 6Parameter

MDRD 4Parameter

Accu

racy

, %Percent of estimates within 30% of the measured GFR in theMDRD Study validation sample (n = 558)

Redrawn from: K/DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease, Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:S1-S266

Evolution of GFR Estimation

Report field creatinine and eGFR4 – variable ID-MS traceable version of MDRD equationUK NEQAS – derived slope adjusters for correctionWhen eGFR exceeds 89 report as >90All adult samples requesting creatinine

UK NEQAS

Implementation and Harmonisation of eGFR

April 2006

40-80%4CKD 4: Percentage of patients who are treated with an ACEi and ARB (unless a contraindication)

40-70%11CKD 3Percentage of patients with a BP of 140/85 or less

40-90%6CKD 2Percentage of patients with a record of blood pressure in the previous 15 months

6CKD 1A register of patients aged 18 years and over with CKD (Stage 3-5 CKD)

PaymentStages

Points

The CKD Domain of QOF

April 2006

11 May 2006

GPs to Shoulder the Burden of CKD

Who Looks After The Patients (%)

10.170.019.8CKD 5

14.028.857.2CKD 4

13.91.684.6CKD 3

Secondary careNephrologyPrimary Care

Impact of eGFR Reporting on Referrals – Lincolnshire PCT

Mar Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec Jan

Feb

Mar Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec Jan

Feb

Mar Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug

Patie

nt n

umbe

rs

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

eGFR reporting

2004 20062005

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

CKD QOF Prev CKD Prev 18+

CKD QOF Prev 3.0% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 1.7%

CKD Prev 18+ 3.8% 3.3% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.8% 2.1%

EAST MIDLANDS

SOUTH WEST

NORTH EAST

YORKSHIRE & HUMBER

SOUTH EAST

COAST

WEST MIDLANDS

SOUTH CENTRAL ENGLAND NORTH

WESTEAST OF ENGLAND LONDON

Org Level NATIONAL National Practice Code (All) Old SHA (All) PCT Short (All)

SHA Short

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF Prevalence & Age Specific Prevalence Aged 18+ - 2006/7 – By SHA

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

Dor

set &

Som

erse

t

Tren

t

Han

ts &

IoW

Sout

h Yo

rksh

ire

Surr

ey &

Sus

sex

NEY

NL

Cum

bria

& L

ancs

Co

Dur

ham

& T

ees

Valle

y

Nor

thum

b Ty

ne &

Wea

r

Leic

s, N

orth

ants

& R

utla

nd

Nor

folk

, Suf

folk

& C

ambs

Che

shire

& M

erse

y

Shro

pshi

re &

Sta

ffs

Birm

ingh

am/B

lack

Cou

ntry

Avon

, Glo

s &

Wilt

s

Wes

t Mid

land

s So

uth

Sout

h W

est P

enin

sula

Wes

t Yor

kshi

re

Kent

& M

edw

ay

Befo

rdsh

ire &

Her

tfors

hire

Esse

x

Gre

ater

Man

ches

ter

Tham

es V

alle

y

SE L

ondo

n

NE

Lond

on

SW

Lon

don

NW

Lon

don

NC

Lon

don

CKD QOF Prev CKD Prev 18+

Org Level Old SHA National Practice Code (All) SHA Name (All) SHA Short (All) PCT Short (All) SHA Code (All)

Old SHA

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF Prevalence & Age Specific Prevalence Aged 18+ - 2006/7 – By Old SHA

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

CKD QOF Prev CKD Prev 18+

CKD QOF Prev 2.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 1.8% 1.6% 1.6%

CKD Prev 18+ 3.7% 3.0% 3.1% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8% 2.9% 2.3% 2.1% 2.0%

OLDHAM BURY SALFORD TRAFFORDASHTON LEIGH & WIGAN

HEYWOOD/MIDDLETON/R

OCHDALE

TAMESIDE & GLOSSOP STOCKPORT MANCHESTE

R BOLTON

Org Level SHA National Practice Code (All) Old SHA Greater Manchester SHA Short (All)

PCT Short

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF Prevalence & Age Specific Prevalence Aged 18+ - 2006/7 – By PCT

Greater Manchester

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

N85

034

N85

008

N85

056

N85

032

N85

616

N85

018

N85

629

N85

041

N85

009

N85

059

N85

028

N85

007

N85

620

N85

058

N85

648

N85

619

N85

029

N85

015

N85

021

N85

046

N85

019

N85

040

N85

017

N85

038

N85

012

N85

023

N85

643

N85

002

N85

031

N85

053

N85

005

N85

024

N85

640

N85

016

N85

013

N85

054

N85

051

N85

617

N85

625

N85

014

N85

022

N85

011

N85

052

N85

020

N85

006

N85

048

N85

633

N85

614

N85

044

N85

624

N85

003

N85

634

N85

057

N85

004

N85

025

N85

635

N85

027

N85

037

N85

047

N85

001

N82

621

N82

050

N82

039

N82

087

N82

018

N82

106

N82

092

N82

109

N82

041

N82

657

N82

095

N82

086

N82

048

N82

070

N82

077

N82

024

N82

037

N82

033

N82

091

N82

646

N82

004

N82

081

N82

669

N82

090

N82

110

N82

647

N82

003

N82

115

N82

645

N82

093

N82

655

N82

679

N82

066

N82

084

N82

083

N82

104

N82

011

N82

053

N82

650

N82

651

N82

035

N82

100

N82

097

N82

663

N82

062

Y00

110

N82

641

N82

662

N82

059

N82

073

N82

113

N82

049

N82

633

N82

108

N82

014

N82

116

N82

060

N82

659

N82

082

N82

022

N82

052

N82

678

N82

046

N82

002

N82

058

N82

671

N82

019

N82

034

N82

103

N82

094

N82

117

N82

664

N82

001

N82

105

N82

670

N82

065

N82

054

N82

078

N82

026

N82

051

N82

623

N82

074

N82

649

N82

648

N82

089

N82

668

N82

107

N82

099

N82

076

N82

617

N82

079

N82

009

N82

676

N82

619

N82

665

N82

036

N82

067

N82

101

N82

021

N82

642

P81

742

P81

037

P81

073

P81

210

P81

086

P81

737

P81

091

P81

129

P81

079

P81

157

P81

077

P81

624

P81

149

P81

056

P81

775

P81

087

P81

031

P81

011

P81

089

P81

762

P81

059

P81

150

P81

745

Y01

008

P81

085

P81

092

P81

006

P81

128

P81

133

P81

191

P81

029

P81

064

P81

688

P81

013

P81

002

P81

668

P81

153

P81

190

P81

690

P81

125

P81

061

P81

214

P81

607

P81

694

P81

058

P81

155

P81

734

P81

704

P81

633

P81

707

P81

005

P81

721

P81

051

P81

167

P81

724

P81

622

P81

719

P81

643

P81

709

P81

712

P81

717

P81

683

P81

198

P81

204

P81

771

P81

022

P81

109

P81

140

P81

673

P81

752

P85

007

P85

017

P85

619

P85

008

P85

028

P85

002

P85

607

P85

011

P85

608

P85

010

P85

029

P85

012

P85

016

Y01

124

P85

605

P85

614

P85

005

Y00

473

P85

606

P85

006

P85

021

P85

026

P85

620

P85

018

P85

013

P85

601

P85

020

P85

615

P85

004

P85

019

P85

022

P89

006

P85

014

P85

003

P85

025

P85

009

P85

613

P85

612

P85

622

P85

603

P85

015

P85

610

P85

621

P85

602

P85

001

P85

024

P82

628

P82

022

P82

016

P82

013

P82

008

P82

626

P82

011

P82

001

P82

021

P82

019

P82

607

P82

634

P82

631

P82

652

P82

029

P82

004

P82

020

P82

633

P82

007

P82

613

P82

036

P82

609

P82

629

P82

009

P82

002

P82

037

P82

643

P82

003

P82

025

P82

005

P82

012

P82

627

P82

006

P82

624

P82

033

P82

030

P82

641

P82

014

P82

637

Y00

186

P82

034

P82

625

P82

010

P82

031

P82

642

P82

640

P82

650

P82

023

P82

615

P82

657

P82

015

P82

606

P82

660

P82

616

P82

018

P82

617

Y00

199

WIRRAL LIVERPOOL NORTH LANCS BLACKBURN/ DARWEN

OLDHAM BOLTON

Cheshire & Mersey Cumbria & Lancs Greater Manchester

CKD QOF Prev CKD Prev 18+

Org Level PCT SHA Short (All)

Old SHA PCT Short National Practice Code

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF Prevalence & Age Specific Prevalence Aged 18+ - 2006/7 – By General Practice

PCT with Lowest CKD

Prevalence In Greater

Manchester

PCT with Highest CKD Prevalence In

Greater Manchester

PCT with Highest CKD Prevalence In

Cheshire &Mersey

PCT with Lowest CKD

Prevalence In Cheshire &

Mersey

PCT with Highest CKD Prevalence In

Cumbria &Lancs

PCT with Lowest CKD

Prevalence In Cumbria &

Lancs

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% BP Last 15 mths % BP 140/85 or less % on ACE/ARB

% BP Last 15 mths 98.5% 98.3% 98.2% 98.2% 98.2% 98.2% 98.2% 98.1% 98.1% 98.0% 97.8%

% BP 140/85 or less 88.1% 87.5% 87.5% 90.1% 87.3% 84.2% 85.5% 86.9% 87.3% 87.1% 86.0%

% on ACE/ARB 83.9% 84.6% 83.3% 86.6% 83.8% 84.4% 83.3% 84.3% 84.2% 85.9% 83.8%

NORTH EAST

NORTH WEST

YORKSHIRE & HUMBE

SOUTH CENTR

AL

EAST OF

ENGLA

WEST MIDLAN

DS

EAST MIDLAN

DS

ENGLAND

SOUTH WEST

SOUTH EAST

COAST

LONDON

Org Level NATIONAL SHA Code (All) SHA Name (All) Old SHA (All) PCT Short (All) National Practice Code (All)

SHA Short

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF Performance - CKD2: Blood Pressure Measured in the Last 18 Months, CKD3: Blood Pressure 140/85 or Less &

CKD4: Hypertensives on ACE/ARB – QOF Results by SHA

BUTThe denominators For CKD2, CKD3& CKD4 are lower than the no. of

people on the CKD RegisterSEE NEXT SLIDE

SHAs

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

NO

RTH

EA

ST

YOR

KSH

IRE

&H

UM

BER

WE

ST M

IDLA

ND

S

NO

RTH

WES

T

SOU

TH W

EST

EN

GLA

ND

EAS

T M

IDLA

ND

S

SO

UTH

EA

STC

OAS

T

EAST

OF

EN

GLA

ND

SO

UTH

CEN

TRAL

LON

DO

N

BP Measured as % of Register BP 140/85 or less as % of Register ACE/ARB as % of Register

Org Level NATIONAL SHA Code (All) SHA Name (All) Old SHA (All) SHA Short (All) National Practice Code (All)

PCT Short

Data

Chronic Kidney Disease – QOF – CKD2: Blood Pressure Measured in the Last 18 Months, CKD3: Blood Pressure 140/85 or Less & CKD4: Hypertensives on

ACE/ARB – As a % of those on the CKD Register

SHAs

This slide showsthe QOF Results

As a % of People on the CKD Register

QOF Results as reported

QOF Results as a % of peopleon the CKD

Register

Education

and System Redesign

EducationEducation

Iseki et al; Am J Kidney Dis 2006

eGFR and dipstick proteinuria add to predictend stage renal disease

n=95.252, follow-up: 17 years

0.01

0.1

1.0

10

100

1000

eGFR (mL/min)0 30 60 90 120

proteinuria negativeInci

denc

eof

ESR

D p

er 1

000

15

5 4 3 2 1 CKD stages

Iseki et al; Am J Kidney Dis 2006

eGFR and dipstick proteinuria add to predictend stage renal disease

n=95.252, follow-up: 17 years

0.01

0.1

1.0

10

100

1000

proteinuria positive

eGFR (mL/min)0 30 60 90 120

proteinuria negativeInci

denc

eof

ESR

D p

er 1

000

15

5 4 3 2 1 CKD stages

40-80%4CKD 5:The percentage of patients on the CKD register with hypertension and proteinuria who are treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) (unless a contraindication or side effects are recorded)

40-70%11CKD 3Percentage of patients with a BP of 140/85 or less

40-90%6CKD 2Percentage of patients with a record of blood pressure in the previous 15 months

6CKD 1A register of patients aged 18 years and over with CKD (Stage 3-5 CKD)

PaymentStages

Points

The CKD Domain of QOF

April 2008

Impact of eGFR Reporting on Identification of CKD Stage 4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69

Weeks

Num

ber o

f new

pa

tient

s

Lincolnshire PCT

Timely initiation of RRT

Neuropathy/Retinopathy

AcidosisSmoking cessation

Timely access placement/

Transplant Listing

Drug interactionsCalcium Phosphate PTH

Glucose control

Informed choice of RRT/conservative

management

Vascular diseaseAnaemiaBP control

EducationCardiac diseaseMalnutritionACE inhibitors

Prepare for RRTModify co morbiditiesPrevent uraemic complications

Delay progression & reduce CVS Risk

Management of CKD

CKD = chronic kidney disease; RRT = renal replacement therapy

Early Detection of CKD

Timely initiation of RRT

Neuropathy/Retinopathy

AcidosisSmoking cessation

Timely access placement/

Transplant Listing

Drug interactionsCalcium Phosphate PTH

Glucose control

Informed choice of RRT/conservative

management

Vascular diseaseAnaemiaBP control

EducationCardiac diseaseMalnutritionACE inhibitors

Prepare for RRTModify co morbiditiesPrevent uraemic complications

Delay progression & reduce CVS Risk

Management of CKD

CKD = chronic kidney disease; RRT = renal replacement therapy

Early Detection of CKDEarly Detection of CKD

Timely initiation of RRT

Neuropathy/Retinopathy

AcidosisSmoking cessation

Timely access placement/

Transplant Listing

Drug interactionsCalcium Phosphate PTH

Glucose control

Informed choice of RRT/conservative

management

Vascular diseaseAnaemiaBP control

EducationCardiac diseaseMalnutritionACE inhibitors

Prepare for RRTModify co morbiditiesPrevent uraemic complications

Delay progression & reduce CVS Risk

Management of CKD

CKD = chronic kidney disease; RRT = renal replacement therapy

Early Detection of CKDEarly Detection of CKD Think/Report eGFR

Education

Empowerment

Encouragement

Registration

Recall

Review

Individual

Care

Plans

Proteinuria = Risk

The Principles of Managed Kidney Care

Integration

Information Technology

Information

eGFR = % Kidney Function