managing informal aspects of decision processes for improving reactivity of industrial systems aline...
TRANSCRIPT
Managing informal aspects of decision processes for improving reactivity of industrial systems
Aline CAUVIN, Riad MEGARTSIDIAM-IMS
Domaine Universitaire de St-JérômeAvenue Escadrille Normandie-Niemen
13397 MARSEILLE CEDEX 20FRANCE
Control system of the firm
Production process Idea of product
Process modelsProduct models
Raw material
Finished product
Controlling enterprise processes
Objectives & constraintsQuality, cost, time
Objectives & constraintsQuality, cost, time
Objectives & constraintsQuality, cost, time Design
controlsystem
Productioncontrolsystem
Design process
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Defining enterprise processes
• Modelling enterprise processes • Elaborating common representation Defining mechanisms
to process disturbances• Analysing disturbances• Modelling reaction processes • Modelling communication networks between
actors
Designing a support to aid enterprise processes control
An approach in disturbed context
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Analysing processes in usual context
InputCode
Verb
Human resources
Technical resources
Type (S, I, E)
Performance Indicators
quality
cost
time
required effective
Output
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Detectingdisturbance
Reaction process to disturbances
Actor
Reacting
Characterizing
Classifying
Identifying
Storing
Tool for analysing disturbances
Disturbance classification
Actor relay
Representation ofdecision making processes
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Disturbance classification : an example
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Criteria Categories
Frequency
Importance
Causality
Control
Low : disturbance seldom occurs
Medium : disturbance occurs from time to time
High : disturbance often occurs
Low : consequences of disturbance are not important for production system or its control
Medium : production plans may be modified
High : consequences of disturbance are important or sometimes catastrophic for production
First : causes of disturbance are identified
Second : causes are consequences of previous disturbances. It is necessary to identify initial causes
Total : disturbance is completely controlled
Partial : disturbance is not completely controlled but reaction rules are available and usable
No control : there are no algorithms, rules or methods to face disturbance
Disturbance
Representation of actor relay
Project managerProductionmanager
Dialogue relationship
Operator Quality managerFormal
communication
Informal communication
Order
(1)
(4)
(3)
(2)
(0)
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Dialogue relationship
Order
Formal communication
Informal communication
Identified
Disturbance
Modelling reaction processes
Normalfunctioning
Normalfunctioning
Disturbedfunctioning
Process Flow /
Defining involved
actors
Processed
Rejectedsolution
Selectedsolution
Process Flow /
Selectingsolutions
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Resolveddisturbance
Process Flow /
Performing solutions
disturbance
Actor involved
Control aided support
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Informing Deciding Storing
Functions
Updating Solving
Solving rules
Database Consulting
Identifying
ConsultingDisturbance
database
New disturbance Classifying
Implementing our approach : an example
Mechanical engineering
Electronic engineering
Computer engineeringPrototype
Conceptual elaboration
Virtual/physical modelling
Evaluation of Concepts
Definition of technical specifications
Detailed design
Prototyping
EE
ME
Coordination
information exchanges
Decision making
Conceptual elaboration
Virtual/physical modelling
Evaluation of Concepts
Definition of technical specifications
Detailed design
Prototyping
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
disturbances
Assem bl yi ng E & S
4. 1
Val i dat i ng pr ot ot ype
18. 1
Assem bl yi ng pr ot ot ype
5. 1
&J 2
Desi gni ng package
2. 1
&J 1
&J 4
Desi gni ng har dwar e
1. 1
Des i gni ng sof t
3. 1
L1 L7L3 L18L9
L6L24
L23L22
Test i ng i nt egr at i on
9. 1
I nt egr at i ng sof t & chi p
8. 1
Per f or m i ng sof t
7. 1
L11L10
Test i ng car d
13. 1
Cabl i ng & wel di ng
12. 1
Per f or m i ng pr i nt ed ci r cui t
10. 1
L14L15
Test i ng package
17. 1
Assem bl yi ng
15. 1
Manuf act ur i ng com ponent s
14. 1
L17L16
P I P I P I
P I P I P I
P IP IP I
P I
P IP I
P I
P I
P I
Assem bl yi ng E & S
4. 1
Val i dat i ng pr ot ot ype
18. 1
Assem bl yi ng pr ot ot ype
5. 1
&J 2
Desi gni ng package
2. 1
&J 1
&J 4
Desi gni ng har dwar e
1. 1
Des i gni ng sof t
3. 1
L1 L7L3 L18L9
L6L24
L23L22
Test i ng i nt egr at i on
9. 1
I nt egr at i ng sof t & chi p
8. 1
Per f or m i ng sof t
7. 1
L11L10
Test i ng car d
13. 1
Cabl i ng & wel di ng
12. 1
Per f or m i ng pr i nt ed ci r cui t
10. 1
L14L15
Test i ng package
17. 1
Assem bl yi ng
15. 1
Manuf act ur i ng com ponent s
14. 1
L17L16
P IP I P IP I P IP I
P IP I P IP I P IP I
P IP IP IP IP IP I
P IP I
P IP IP IP I
P IP I
P IP I
P IP I
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Design process
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Actor relay
Project manager
Customer
Supplier
Technician
0 1
Manager ofelectronics Dpt
Manager ofmechanics Dpt
Purchasing officer Sales executive
25
89 9
9 94
10
11
External Environment
Internal
Environment
Computer manager
Disturbance
6
7
3
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Reaction process
Integration
performed
Integration
validated
Process Flow/Testing
intégration
Integration
non validated
Soft
re-programmed
Process Flow/
Selecting solution
Goto /
Designing Soft
Assemblying E&S
Goto/
Goto /
IntegratingChanged chip
Not available Ordered Received/
Process Flow/Selecting supplier
Process Flow /Requesting component
Available
Goto
Integrating
Problematics ( 2 ) Proposals ( 6 ) Implementation ( 5 )
Proposal for improving actor relay
Project manager
Customer
Supplier
Technician
0 1
Manager ofelectronics Dpt
Manager ofmechanics Dpt
Purchasing officer Sales executive
2
42 2
22
6
7
Computer manager
Disturbance
3
5
Management of reactions to disturbances
Analyzing and characterizing disturbances to evolve reactions
Capitalizing decision processes in order to reuse them for future
reactions
To conclude : interests of the approach
Improving structure and functioning of industrial organizations
Improving knowledge management
Improving communication between actors