management of technology & innovation mktg5603 & … · 2016-07-15 · creating an ip...
TRANSCRIPT
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Management of Technology & Innovation MKTG5603 &
Biotechnology Commercialisation MKTG5604
Workshop 4 Part B: IP Rights &
Creating an IP Portfolio Professor Tim Mazzarol – UWA Business School
UWA Business School MBA Program
M Biotech Program
[email protected] MOTI MKTG5603
BC MKTG5604
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
The four most common types of Intellectual Property rights that are important in the world
of R&D are patents, trade secrets, copyrights and trademarks.
Type of IP right General description Conditions Duration of rights
Patents Official right granted by sovereign state to
patent owner for exclusive title, use, sale of a
device, substance, method or process.
Patent must be:
1. New
2. Involve an inventive step
3. Have industrial use
20 years.
Trademarks
A letter, number, word, phrase, smell, shape,
logo, picture, aspect of packaging or
combination of these to distinguish one
supplier from another.
Cannot be generic name, does not
need formal registration but
ownership could be contested.
Cannot look like existing
trademarks.
10 years but can be
extended.
Can be lost if not used.
Registered
Designs
The visual aspects of a logo or product
resulting from the features of, in particular, the
lines, contours, colours, shape, texture or
materials of the product or its ornamentation.
Must be new and distinctive for
certified registration.
Protects the specific look of the
article.
10 years but can be
renewed.
Copyrights Is granted automatically upon creation of the
work and covers artistic work, music, literary
work, broadcast media and software. It
prohibits unauthorised copying or reproduction
of the works.
Formal registration is not needed
but authors should place copyright
notices on all works.
Offered under Universal Copyright
Convention.
Lifetime of the author plus
70 years from date of
publication.
Trade Secrets
Firms make use of confidentiality and non-
disclosure agreements for all employees, sub-
contractors and suppliers.
No official registration needed but it
must be clear that something is
being protected.
Last for as long as secret is
kept e.g. Coke’s Formula X.
Sources: Ambrozy (2013); IP Australia (2010)
Common Types of IP Rights Protection
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Key issues with IP rights
Patents
• Australia and USA standardised
IP rights laws in 2005 following
the free trade agreement of 2001.
• Patents must be registered in
each country where they might be
required.
• Patents often build on existing
patented inventions and these
might need to be considered in
any future use or sale of the
patent.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Key issues with IP rights
Trade Secrets
• Typically covers a formula, pattern
or device or process but not things
like customer lists.
• Only apply if the idea is not know to
others outside the firm, cannot be
easily found out and firm has taken
appropriate steps to protect it.
• Cannot protect against a rival firm
also discovering the idea or even
reverse engineering it from your
product.
• Varies from country to country.
• May offer a cheaper alternative to
patents at least in the early
development stage.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Key issues with IP rights
Copyright & Trademarks
• Copyright should be applied to
software, plus manuals for
owners and operators.
• Also any relevant
documentation or marketing
materials including websites.
• Trademarks should be used on
a continuous basis.
• You will need to police the use
of trademarks to ensure that
they are not eroded by
“generic” use. – E.g. “Aspirin” lost its trademark due to lack of policing.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
How IP Rights Impact NPD using
StageGate®
Will the IP be
patented or will
trademarks be
developed?
If so can you
secure licence
agreements? If licence agreements
cannot be secured can
the product be
redesigned? Are there
existing patents
or trademarks?
If product redesign is
needed this will move
the NPD process
backwards
Invention Screening Committee
Conducts initial IP review at
Gate 1 and IP Business Case
Assessment at Gate 2
Invention
Disclosure to
Patent Attorney
IP
Clearance
Review
Patent or
Trade Secret?
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Boundaries of IP Rights
Your Competitor’s IP Rights
Your Company’s New
Product IP Rights
Your Company’s New
Product IP Rights
Your Competitor’s IP Rights
Unfavourable situation as competitor can
potentially block use of your own IP due
to excessive overlap of patents or other
factors.
Favourable situation as competitor’s IP
rights only overlap you company’s rights
and you can avoid excessive conflicts or
need to negotiate IP rights permissions.
May require
licencing
agreements
May require
product
redesign
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Moving the NPD process to product launch via StageGate®
Key issues to consider
• Once IP clearance review has been completed (Stages 1-4) the NPD process moves to Stage 5 “Product Launch”.
• However, unless all legal reviews are fully addressed conflicting IP rights claimants may block the invention’s release.
• A judge may order your firm to stop selling the product.
• This can be very expensive and even crippling to a new product and a small firm.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Source: Ambrozy (2013)
Ownership of IP Rights and Joint
Ventures
Key issues to consider
• Ensure that employment and
consultant contracts: – Specify that all inventions or copyrightable works
made by the employee or consultant (undertaken on
company time) are the property of the company.
– Require that the employee assign all IP rights flowing
from inventions to the employer and cooperate with the
employer during any IP rights prosecution.
• In any Joint Ventures involving the
joint development of IP prepare
agreements that clarify: – What the background IP rights contributions for each
partner will be.
– Agreement over the right to use any IP developed during
the JV.
– Agreement over the right to own any IP developed during
the JV.
– Agreement over which party will be responsible for
seeking IP rights protection.
– Whether either party can license the IP rights to a third
party without permission from the other parties.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Developing an IP Strategy
• Using IP to its best advantage to
help the commercialisation and
business model development.
• Allows for enhanced:
– Innovation
– Invention
– IP rights protection
– Management of resources
– Commercialisation
– Leveraging of resources
– Financial returns to R&D
– Risk management
– Investor confidence
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
IP Strategy in the Commercialisation
Process
Seed
Develop Product
Market Entry
Growth Stability
•Staff have assigned IP and signed NDAs
•Management has working knowledge of IP
•Key IP identified
•IP protection in place
•Standard NDA
•IP addressed in customer & JV
agreements
•Management aware of core IP
•IP policies and processes in place (e.g. staff
induction and exit processes)
•Formal NDA processes and reviews
•Formal IP policies in place re contractors,
suppliers, customers
•Establish and review rights to use third party IP
•Management aware of core company IP and
established IP strategy
•IP in staff lifecycle - recruitment, commencement,
departure
•Annual IP reviews to assess against best practice
policies
•Assess portfolio against current business
objectives
•Annual reviews of third party agreements and
compliance with permitted uses
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
IP Strategy
Visionary
Objectives Use IP to stake a claim to future opportunities & embed IP into the corporate culture
Action Strategic partnering plus measurement and reporting.
Integrated
Objectives Views IP as a business asset, uses IP across the business in strategic manner integrated into company.
Action Align company and IP strategies managing IP across all areas focused on value creation.
Profit Centre
Objectives Seeks to monetize IP as a business asset, tactical non-core, not strategic, low hanging fruit.
Action Seek management buy-in, with pro-active licencing of low hanging fruit, consider IP donations and Royalty Audits using IP screening criteria.
Cost Control
Objectives IP viewed as legal asset within a portfolio, with aim to reduce IP costs.
Action Relate IP portfolio to business use, Establish IP committee and screening criteria plus IP filing and renewal guidelines. Prune IP portfolio regularly.
Defensive
Objectives Views IP as a legal asset and seeks to create a defensive position and capability, with plan to secure access to third-party technologies.
Action Make stock take of IP ownership within the firm, secure and maintain IP rights but also respect IP rights of third parties and enforce your own IP rights.
IP Strategy Options
Source: QPSX (2005)
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
IP Strategy Development Process
Source: QPSX (2005)
1. Initial Pass
• What IP is there?
• Who is creating it?
• What systems are in place?
2. Status report
• Report from “initial pass”
• What issues does it reveal?
IP principles
• What IP is relevant?
• What are the audit guidelines?
3. Goals and drivers
• Set goals and drivers
• Determine time frame for successful completion
4. Define scope
• How wide will the IP audit be?
• Internal only or industry wide?
5. IP audit
• Locate IP assets
• Identify critical gaps
• Map IP protections
• List urgent actions
6. IP Asset Register
• Central record of all IP assets
7. Report and recommendation
• What does the audit reveal and what action is needed?
8. Define strategy
• What gaps need to be filled?
• What processes are required?
• What IP rights exist?
• Protection strategies.
• Leverage options.
9. Implement and review
• Implement strategy
• Review effectiveness
• Staff have assigned IP and signed NDAs
• Management has working knowledge of IP
• Key IP identified
• IP protection in place
• Standard NDA agreements used
• IP addressed in customer & JV agreements
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
IP Management Checklist
• Identify all IP associated with your business and itemize them in your business plan.
• Check that you really do own all IP used in your business or that you have the right to use it.
• List registered IP and place a dollar value on identified assets.
• List unregistered IP and give it a dollar value.
• List other valuable assets such as client lists and corporate knowledge.
• Identify key staff involved in developing, maintaining and protecting your IP and get them to sign agreements relating to confidentiality and competition.
• Educate staff on the nature of IP, how to protect it and their responsibilities.
• Consider ways you can use the IP system in your overall business strategy. Decide which markets (including overseas ones) you wish to pursue before going public.
• Develop an infringement strategy. Consider insuring your IP against infringement and against your infringement of someone else's IP.
• Search the patent, trade mark and design databases, as well as other literature and the Internet to ensure your ideas are new and to avoid infringing the rights of others. You can also search for new business opportunities and keep a tab on what your competition is doing.
• Maintain secrecy and be first to market.
• Make effective trade marks the core of your brand and image building strategy.
Source: IP Australia (2005)
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Why Licensing?
Source: QPSX (2005)
What does a licence do?
• License prevents others from
exploiting your inventions.
• It can involve patents, copyright,
trade marks and trade secrets.
• Typical license offers an exclusive
or non-exclusive right to use and
sell the IP in a given territory or
“field of use”.
• Key objectives: – Licensor: leverage the invention, generate
income.
– Government & non-profits: disseminate
knowledge.
– Early stage biotech: fund future R&D, proof
of concept.
– Licensee: access to technology.
– Large firms: diversify technology pipeline.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Some Licensing Considerations
Source: QPSX (2005)
Key issues: • There are no “standard royalties”
• Negotiation is the key with
attention given to: – The technology – scope, strengths and
weaknesses, can it be “designed around”?
– The Competition – what other options exist
and how much threat?
– Mutual Benefits – what do the two parties
want from the deal?
• Royalties are allocations of future
profits.
• Royalties are NOT: – Payment for inherent value of Licensor’s IP.
– Means of recovering IP owner’s sunk costs.
– A “standard” percentage of net sales.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Valuing IP Assets
• Cost Based Valuations – Includes cost of R&D, prototype development, patent registration
and legal fees plus any marketing costs
– Useful where a clear trading history exists
– Assumes buyer would need to spend the same amount of money to replicate the IP assets
– Requires careful record keeping of development costs
• Market Based Valuations – Follows similar logic to how real estate is valued
– Requires market equivalent asset for comparison
• Income Based Valuations – Uses NPV analysis
– Requires ability to forecast future earnings stream from IP assets
– Not suitable for early stage innovations
Source: Tenebaum (2002)
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Considerations in IP Asset valuation
• What is the economic life of the IP asset?
• What is the lifecycle of the technology in which the IP asset resides?
• Is there legal protection of the IP asset (e.g. patents)?
• How transferable is the IP asset from one owner to the next?
• Are there any restrictions on the exploitation of the IP asset?
• What is the level of R&D required to maintain the IP asset?
• What is the nature of the competitive environment?
• What is the normal financial return associated with the development of such an IP asset?
• What is the extent of functional and/or technological obsolescence?
• What are the forecasts for economic and technological trends in the industry?
• What is the likely cost of developing competing IP assets?
Source: Bertolotti (1995)
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Three Steps for Valuation of IP
Source: QPSX (2005)
• Cost of manufacture & sale of product
• Price of competing products
• Resulting profit margin
• Market size & growth
• Market share
• Competitors
• Consumer trends
• Technology lifecycle
• IP owner’s track record
• Asset contribution of licensee
• Economic outlook
Step 1: Quantify the Total Possible Profit
• Relative contributions of parties for royalty split
• Rule of thumb – 75/25
• 25% Licensor
• 75% Licensee
• Only “starting point”
• 25% split of pre-tax profit
Step 2: Fair Allocation of Profits
• Lump sum
• Periodic royalties
• Minimum royalties
• Prepaid royalties (credit)
Step 3: Method of payment
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
The 25% Rule
Source: QPSX (2005)
Scenario 1: Licensing the patent enhances or improves product revenue
No Patent
Available
Revenue
Enhancing Patent
25% Rule
Revenue $200,000 $210,000
Cost of Sales $80,000 $80,000
Gross Margin $120,000 $130,000
Operating Expenses $60,000 $60,000
Operating Profits $60,000 $70,000 ($70.000*25%)
/$210.000 = 8.3%
Applying the 25% rule to the expected operating profits results in a royalty rate of 8.3%
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
The 25% Rule
Source: QPSX (2005)
Scenario 2: Licensing the patent reduces the product costs
No Patent
Available
Revenue
Enhancing Patent
25% Rule
Revenue $200,000 $200,000
Cost of Sales $80,000 $70,000
Gross Margin $120,000 $130,000
Operating Expenses $60,000 $60,000
Operating Profits $60,000 $70,000 ($70.000*25%)
/$200.000 = 8.75%
Applying the 25% rule results in a royalty rate of 8.75%
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
IP Valuation for Licensing
Source: QPSX (2005)
Pros & Cons of Net Sales-Based Allocation of the Expected Profits
• Licensees like this because they
don’t have to disclose profits.
• Licensors like but Licensees dislike
the need to pay royalties
immediately, even if no profit yet.
• Can restrict licensee’s flexibility in
setting prices to compete with key
competitors and can erode their
profit margin.
• Due to the uncertainty over future
profits this will lower the amount of
royalty %.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Factors Favouring Licensing Parties
Source: QPSX (2005)
Factors that favour the Licensor
• Broad, valid, assignable patents.
• Related know-how and trade
secrets.
• Marketing contacts & potential
customers.
• Existing brand names
• Company reputation in the market
• Well funded and resourced
• Productive R&D pipeline for NPD
• History of successful licensing
Factors that favour the Licensee
• Substantial NPD and product
commercialisation work required.
• Substantial investment in plant &
personnel required.
• Existing strong competition in both
market and product segment.
• Existing plant and capacity.
• Existing skilled workforce.
• Existing sales and distribution
channels.
©Mazzarol 2015 all rights reserved
Group Discussion
Working in teams
• Complete the IP questionnaire
for the project.
• How strong or weak are the IP
rights associated with the
project’s technologies and
related innovation?
• Is there an IP Assets Register?
• Is there an IP valuation strategy
in case of the need to license
or sell the technology?
• Develop an IP strategy