File: 180

DR.B

Management Action PlanElelson Air Force Base, Alaska

22 December 1992

United States Air Force?' Environmental Restoration Program

* ~~~~~Table of ContentsChapter Page

1 Introduction and Summary ....................................................... 1I1.1 Environmental Response Objectives............................................. 11.2 MAP Purpose ............................................................ 21.3 Project Team ............................................................. 21.4 Brief History of Installation................................................... 4

2 Property Disposal and Reuse Plan.................................................. 5

3 Installation-Wide Environmental Program Status........................................ 63.1 fIRP Status............................................................... 6

3.1.1 IRP Sources ........................................................ 143.1.2 Installation-Wide Source Discovery/Assessment Status .......................... 14

3.2 Compliance Program Status .................................................. 153.2.1 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) and Fliglitline ............................. 163.2.2 Solid Waste, Asbestos, PCBs, NPDES Permit, Other ............................ 16

3.3 Status of Community Involvement .............................................. 163.4 Environmental Condition of Property ........................................... 18

3.4.1 Areas of Known Contamination ........................................... 183.4.2 Areas of No Suspected Contamination ...................................... 193.4.3 Unevaluated Areas.................................................... 19

* ~~4 Installation-Wide Strategy for Environmental Restoration ................................. 214.1 Zone/Operable Unit Designation and Strategy ..................................... 21

4.1.1 Zone Designations.................................................... 214.1.2 Operable Unit Designations ............................................. 214.1.3 Sequence of OUs..................................................... 224.1.4 Removal Actions and Treatabifity Studies .................................... 224.135 Community Relations Strategy ........................................... 254.1.6 Remedy Selection Approach ............................................. 26

4.2 Compliance Strategy ....................................................... 264.2.1 Underground Storage Tanks ............................................. 264.2.2 Solid Waste, Asbestos, PCBs, Other ........................................ 27

5 Environmental Restoration/Compliance Program Master Schedule .......................... 285.1 Installation Restoration Program .............................................. 28

5.1.1 Response Schedules................................................... 285.1.2 Requirements by Fiscal Year ............................................ 28

5.2 Compliance ............................................................. 25.2.1 Compliance Schedules ................................................. 285.2.2 Requirements by Fiscal Year ............................................ 28

5.3 Project Team Meeting Schedule................................................ 29

6 Technical and Other Issues to be Resolved .............. ....... ...................... 326.1 Data Usability............................................................ 326.2 Information Management at Eielson AFBh........................................ 32

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

List of FiguresFiguret Page

I Not Used2 Map of Source Areas Under Investigation at Eielson AFBR.................................1.33 Environmental-Condition-of-Property Map ............................................ 204 Not UsedS Operable Units Composition and Deliverable Dates ..................................... 236 Strategy and Primary Document Timeline for Operable Units at Eielson AFB .................. 247 Projected Restoration Master Schedule .............................................. 308 Project Schedule for Compliance Programs ............................................ 31

List of TablesTable Page

1 Current Eielson AFB Project Team Members .......................................... 32 Not Used3 Source Summary Table.......................................................... 84 Removal and Interim Action Status................................................. 145 Compliance and Closure-Related Projects ............................................ ii6 Planned Removal Actions and Treatability Studies ....................................... 247 Project Team Meeting Schedule ................................................... 29A-i Funding Requirements by Fiscal Year for DERA-Eligible Activities ........................ 33A-2 Funding Requirements by Fiscal Year for Compliance Program ........................... 35

* Chapter 1Introduction and Summary

This Management Action Plan (MAP) contains a status summary of the Ejelson Air Force Base (AFB)

environmental restoration and compliance programs and presents dhe comprehensive strategy for

implementing response actions necessary to protect human health and the environment. This MAP also

presents a strategy for the Base which, when followed, will promote an organized and consistent approach in

the execution of restoration activities. This strategy integrates and coordinates activities under both the

Installation Restoration Program (IRP) and the Environmental Compliance Program (EC). Although

environmental compliance programs are on-going at the Base (e~g., USTs, PCBs, Asbestos, etc.), it is the

intent of this MAP to discuss in detail only those programs which affect restoration activities and only give a

brief summary of plans to manage responses for Environmental Compliance Programs. The Eielson AFB

MAP does the following:

* Chapter 1, Introduction and Summary describes the objectives of the Base Environmental RestorationProgram, the purpose of this Management Action Plan, the Project Team formed for the program, and

provides a brief history of the installation;

*Chapter 2Z Property Disposal and Reuse Plan is omitted from the Eielson AFB Management Action

Plan because it is not a Base that has been selected for closure;

* Chapter 3, Installation-Wide Environmental Program Status summarizes the status of the Eielson AFBIRP and Environmental Compliance programs, accounts for all contaminated sites, and clearly defines

the regulatory programs under which each is being addressed;

* Chapter 4, Installation-Wide Strategy for Environmental Restoration describes the installation-wide

strategy for environmental restoration through definition of operable units (OUs) and the scope of

removal and remedial activities associated with (or to be completed for) each operable unit, summarizes

plans for managing underground tanks via the underground storage tank (UST) program, and

summarizes plans for managing responses under other compliance programs;

* Chapter 5, Environmental Restoration/Compliance Program Master Schedule provides a master

schedule of planned and anticipated activities to be performed throughout the duration of the

environmental restoration program, including restoration-related compliance activities;

* Chapter 6, Technical and Other Issues to be Resolved describes specific technical and/or administrative

issues to be resolved by the Eielson AFB Project Team, and a strategy and approximate schedule of

their resolution.

Environmental Response Objectives

The objectives of the environmental restoration program at Eielson AFB are as follows:

* Protect human health and the environment;

* Comply with existing statutes and regulations;

* * ~~Conduct all IRP activities in a manner consistent with Section 120 of the Comprehensive Environmental

Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act (SARA);

1

* Meet Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) deadlines and/or commitments in other agreements;

* Complete RIs as soon as practicable for each OU, in order of priority,

* Continue efforts to identify all potential source areas;

*Imitiate selected removal actions to control, eliminate, or reduce risks to manageable levels;

* Identify and map the environmental condition of installation property, including areas of no suspectedcontamination (ANSCs), concurrent with remedial investigation (RI) efforts; characterize risks associatedwith releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous wastes;

* Develop, screen, and select remedial actions (RAs) that reduce risks in a manner consistent withstatutory requirements; commence RAs as required by the FFA;

* Conduct long-term RAs for groundwater and any necessary five-year reviews for wastes left onsite.

1.2MAP Purpose

This Management Action Plan presents, in summary fashion, the status of Eielson AFB's environmentalrestoration and compliance programs, and the comprehensive strategy for environmental restoration andrestoration-related compliance activities. In addition, it defines the status of efforts to resolve technicalissues so that continued progress and implementation of scheduled activities can occur. The MAP is adynamic document that will be updated on a regular basis as the restoration process is accomplished.

1.30Project Team

The Eielson AFB Project Team has been established and is led by the Base's Environmental RemedialProject Manager (RPM). Table 1 lists the team members, and specifies their roles and responsibilities.Project Team meetings are the primary means of resolving technical issues, reaching consensus, andproposing the best technical answers for dleanup problems. The Project Team is the principle forum forresolving technical and administrative issues of environmental response actions, and meets at least quarterlyor more frequently as needed. The RPMs review environmental documents and plans, and providecomments and regulatory input to improve the final product.

The Environmental Steering Committee (ESC) is internal to the Base Civil Engineering organization andprovides civil and environmental engineering review of proposed environmental response actions. The ESCgives technical review of documents and plans, and recommends results, findings, proposals and actions.

The Technical Review Committee (ITlRC is chaired by the Vice Wing Commander and consists ofrepresentatives from the U.S. Air Force, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Alaska Department ofEnvironmental Conservation (ADEC); community representatives from North Pole, Fairbanks, and theUniversity of Alaska. The purpose of the ThC is to facilitate communication and coordination among themembers of the mRC, to provide an opportunity for members to comment on environmental cleanup actions,and to facilitate regulatory and public participation consistent with applicable laws and the Federal FacilitiesAgreement. The TRC members review and comment on technical documents, related plans and data forrecommended response actions. TRC recommendations are advisory in nature and are submitted to theEnvironmental Protection Committee.

The Eielson AFB Environmental Protection Committee (EPC) is the executive body through which0environmental decisions and policy are made. The EPC is chaired by the Vice Wing Commander and

2

consists of command representatives. The EPC members review Project Team, ESC and TRCrecommendations for environmental response actions and comment on the overall impact the proposedactions or plans have on the base. The EPC recommends plans, proposals, and actions to the WingCommander for decision.

The Wing Commander, who is the ultimate decision maker, has appointed the Vice Wing Commander toserve as chairman of the EPC and the TRC and be responsible for the actions of the RPM~s and projectteam members.

CORE TEAM MEMBERS

Name 'flte Phone Role/Responsibility

Capt. Bruce L. Chief (907)377-4361 Eielson AFBSteely Environmental Environmental Manager

Management

RPM 1 Julie L. Stringer Environmental Restoration (907)377-1164 Eielson APE EnvironmentalManager Remedial Project Manager

RPM A Sam Gibboney Operable Unit Manager (907)377-1923 Alternate Remedial ProjectManager

RPM 2 Capt. Max L. Installation Restoration (907)377-2922 Eielson AFB Environmental

Gandy Program Manager Restoration Manager

Brent Koenen Environmental (907)377-1689 Eielson APR EnvironmentalCompliance Manager Compliance Manager

RPM 3 Mary lane Nearman EPA Representative (206)553-6642 Environmental ProtectionEielson APE Agency, Region 10 Seattle

RPM 4 Rielle Markey ADEC Representative (907)451-2117 Alaska Department ofEielson APR Environmental Conservation,

Fairbanks Office

Contractor 1 Edwin R. Ruff Engineering-Science, Inc. (509)943-0909 Site-wide IRP/EC ContractorSenior Project Manager

Contractor 2 Ron Smith Battelle Environmental (509)376-5831 RI/PS SupportManagement OperationsProject Manager

OTHER KEY PARTICIPANTS

Contractor 3 Rob Hinchee Battelle Columbus (614)424-4698 Bioventing ContractorProject Manager

Contractor 4 Terry Winsor EA Engineering, Science, (510)283-7077 Removal of Floating Productand Technology, Inc. Contractor

Contractor 5 Rick Belan The MITRE Corporation (512)536-4317 QAIQC Documents Contractor

TPM 1 Marty Faile AFCEE (210)536-5392 Air Force Center forTechnical Project Manager Environmental

Excellence, Technical ProjectManager

TPA Mark Wright Modem Technology Corp. (907)372-2031 AFCEE Contractor

Technical Project Assistant Technical Project Assistant

0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TableICurrent Etelson AFB Project Team Members

3

1.4Brief History of installation

Ejelson AFB is an active Air Farce facility approximately 100 miles south of the Arctic Circle and 26 milessoutheast of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Base is approximately 2 miles east of the Tanana River and is isolatedfrom any major urban areas. The communities closest to the Base are Saicha, Moose Creek, North Pole,and Fairbanks.

The facility encompasses approximately 19,790 acres of the Fairbanks North Star Borough. Approximately3,651 acres are improved or partially improved; and 16,139 acres are undeveloped land encompassing forest,wetlands, lakes, and ponds. Base topography is generally flat and somewhat featureless with elevationsranging from 550 feet above mean sea level (msl), sloping downward to the north-northwest. Elevations onthe undeveloped side of the Base are as high as 1,125 feet above msl.

Eielson AFB was originally a satellite installation of Ladd Field (now Fort Wainwright, a U.S. Armyinstallation). Intial construction of the Base began in 1943, with completion in 1944. The Base wasdeactivated at the end of World War II and reopened in 1946 as a future strategic base. From 1947 to 1954,a major construction program expanded the facilities at the Base. Since the early 1960s, the primary missionof Eielson AFB has been to provide trained tactical air support forces for air strike control and directsupport of Army ground elements assigned to Alaska.

Since 1950, major industrial operations at Eielson AFB have been performed to maintain and supportresident operations. Propulsion shops, vehicle maintenance shops, and hydraulic shops an Base generatedwaste oils, fuels, solvents, and cleaners. Since 1981, the level of maintenance activities has increased due toan increased number of military aircraft added to the Base. Eielson AFB's mission expanded to providetactical support to Alaskan Air Command and later to Pacific Air Forces. Within Eielson AFB's boundaries,these many sources of contaminants developed into several hazardous waste sites. Because of past industrial Spractices, many federally owned facilities have faced similar environmental problems. These past practiceshave caused groundwater and soil contamination, and the potential for surface water contamination.

In November 1989, Eielson AFB was listed on the National Priorities List (NFL), which brought it under theFederal Facilities provisions of CERCLA Section 120. This action required the Air Force to enter into anFFA with the Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Alaska for conduct of installationenvironmental restoration efforts specific to designated IRP sites. The FFA between Eielson APB, EPA,and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation was finalized on 21 May 1991.

4

* Chapter 2Property Disposal and Reuse Plan

Chapter 2 Property Disposal and Reuse Plan has not been used because Eielson AFB has not been selectedfor closure and associated property disposal pursuant to the Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 andthe Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990.

5

Chapter 3Installation-Wide Environmental Program Status

This chapter provides a status summary of the current IRP and on-going compliance activities at EielsonAFB. It also summarizes the status of community involvement to date and describes the environmentalcondition of Eielson AFB property.

3.1IRP Status

In May 1991, the Air Farce, EPA Region 10, and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservationsigned a Federal Facilities Agreement pursuant to the following authorities:

* CERCLA Section 120;

* Sections 3004(u) and (v), 3008(h), and 6001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),

as amended;

* National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA);

* Executive Order 12580;

* The Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP); and

*Alaska Statutes 46.03, 46.04, 46.08, 46.09, and 18 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 60, 18 AAC 62, 18AAC 75, and 18 AAC 80.

The FFA requires compliance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP), CERCLA guidance and policy, RCRA guidance and policy, and applicable state law.

Under Section VIII of the FFA, the Air Force agreed to undertake, seek adequate funding for, fullyimplement, and report on the foliowing tasks:

* Conduct Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/ES) in accordance with the Eielson AFB RI/FSSite Management Plan, and implement the Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/HA) at the Site inaccordance with the final RD, the RA Work Plan, and all relevant statutes and regulations.

* Implement potential source identification and evaluation under the Source Evaluation Report (SER)process in compliance with appropriate remedial site evaluation requirements of 40 CFR 300.420.

* Develop and implement Interim Actions as necessary to protect the public health, welfare, and theenvironment.

* Develop, implement, and report upon remedial investigations of the Site in compliance with applicablerequirements of CERCIA, NCP, FFA, and pertinent written guidance and EPA policy.

* Design, propose, undertake, and report upon feasibility studies for the Site in compliance with applicablerequirements of CERCLA,, NCP, FFA, and pertinent written guidance and EPA policy.

* Develop and submit proposed remedial alternatives for each operable unit. Selection of the HA will beby the EPA and Air Force, in consultation with ADEC.

6

* ~~Under Section XXIV of the FFA, all parties agreed to the deadlines for the draft primary documentsconcerning the total site and six operable units as follows:

* Site-Wide RI/FSManagement Plan 06/17/91ROD 09/30/95

* Operable Unit 1Management Plan 01/15/93RI/FS 11/20/93ROD 04/29/94

Interim Action lBROD 06/15/92

* Operable Unit 2Management Plan 06/17/91RI/FS 07/21/93ROD 12/21/93

* Operable Unit 3Management Plan 11/13/92RI/FS 10/19/94ROD 03/19/95

* * ~~Operable Unit 4Management Plan 11/13/92RI/FS 10/19/94ROD 03/19/95

* Operable Unit 5Management Plan 11/13/92RI/FS 10/19/94ROD 03/19/95

* Operable Unit 6Management Plan 01/15/93RI/FS 11/20/93ROD 04/29/94

Interim Action 6BROD 06/15/93

As of December 1992, all deadlines for draft primary documents as listed above have been met.

With respect to other known potential sources not included in the operable units above an SER will be

submitted. In the SER, the Air Force will propose: 1) no further action; 2) referral to another state orfederal program; 3) limited fieldwork for additional source inspection; or 4) a schedule for inclusion in theCERCLA process either under an existing OU or subject to a renmediation schedule that is in accordancewith the generic schedules in the FFA. Table 3 and Figure 2 summarize the information on the 64 source. ~~areas identified on Eielson AFB.

7

Source WIMS-ES class Material Date of Regulatory0NoM ID) Source Alias Grouping Description Disposed Of Operation Status Mechanism

1 LFO1 SER Original base General refuse including empty cans 1950-1960 Si EPAlandfill and 55-gallon drums; may have Inactive

received waste oils, spent solvents,paint residues, and thinners

2 LFfl2 SER Old base General refuse; also received waste 1960-1967 Si WFAlandfill oils, spent solvents, paint residues and Inactive

thinners.

3 LP03 OU5 Current base General refuse; landfill received waste Landfill RI/FS PEAlandfill oils, spent solvents, paint reidues and 1967-1987;,(inactive) thinners, POL wastes burned during Fire

fire training, departmenttraining

1955-1976Inactive

4 LF04 OU5 Old Army General refuse and possibly small Unknown RI/FS WFAlandfill and quantities of waste oil, spent solvents, InactiveEOD area munitions, and spent cartridges

received by old landfill. This iscurrently a RCRA-registered trainingare for munitions disposal.

S LFO5 SER Old Army General refuse including scrap Unknown NFA PEAlandfill materials and empty drums and Inactive

containers; probably received smallquantities of waste oils and spentsolvents.

6 LPO6 SER Old landfill Secondary landfill received general 1959-1963 Si WFArefuse, empty drums and paint Inactivecontainers; small quantities of wastepaints, thinners, and spent solvents asdrum reiduals.

7 L107 SER Test landfill General household garbage. 1967 NPA WIAInactive

8 FMO SiK Fire training Suspected fire training area; POL 1948-1955 NFA WIAarea (past) waste used in fire training exercises. Inactive

9 Ff09 GUS Fire training 500 to 1,000 gallons of JP-4 fuel used 1976-1987 RI/PS PEAarea during each exercise. Inactive

10 SnIO 0U2 E-2 POL MOCIAS and ff-4 leaks from storage Prior to RI/FS EPAStorage tanks at the E-2 POL storage area; 1978

possible migration to H-ardfill Lake. Active

n1 SDI OU2 Puel- Diesel fuel floating on water table; 1950s RI/FS PEAsaturated are possibly release~d from tanks at Inactive

former bakery or former boiler house.

12 SS12 SER JP-4 spill, JP-4 fuel spill; 5,000 gallons spilled, 1981 NFA WFABuilding 2351 majority contained within building, Inactive

100 gallons flowed outside building.

13 ST13 0U2 £4 diesel Diesel and MOGAS from ruptured, Unknown RI/FS EPAfuel spill leaking. or overfilled fuel bladders at Active

E-4 refueling/defueling area.

Table 3Source Summary Table

8

SourmSource WIMS-ES Class Material Date of Regulatory

No. ED Source Mlias Grouping Description Disposed Of Operation Status Mechanism

14 SS14 0U2 E-2, RR SPA4 JP4 fuel spills during delivery Prior to 1977 RI/FS EPAspill are of fuels along railroad line Inactive

adjacent to E-2 POL storageareal.

15 SW1 SER Multiproduct 5,000-gallon spill of MOGAS in 1970-1973 NMA PEAfuel line 1970 and SPA fuel in 1973. Inactive

16 STI6 SER MOGAS fuel MOGAS spill of 5,000 gallons. Around 1957 NMA EPAline spill Inactive

17 S117 SER Canal pipeline Pipeline rupture released 1957 NMA PEAspill 20,000 gallons diesel fuel onto Inactive

an adjacent highway.

18 S'1f1S 0U2 Oil boiler Diesel fuel floating in 8-foot Mid-1970s RI/FS PERAfuel-saturated deep holes dug during Inactiveare connstruction activities; possibly

from old boiler plant.

19 Sfl9 0U2 JPA4 fuel line JPA4 fuel releas of 200,000 Late 1950s RI/FS EPAspill are gallons during fuel line rupture. Inactive

20 STf0 OUt Refueling JP-4 fuel spills in the refueling Unknown RI/PS EPAloop fuel- are; also leaks of SPA fuel Activesaturated area from delivery lines for buried

storage tanks.

21 SD21 SER Road oiling, POL waste prior to 1978 1950-early, NFA PEAQuarry Rtoad included waste oils, 1980s

contaminated fuels, and spent Inactivesolvents; since 1978, primarilywaste engine oils andcontaminated diesel fuel.

22 SD22 SER Road oiling, POL waste prior to 1978 1950-early NFA EPAIndustrial included waste oils, 1980SDrive contaminated fuels, and spent Inactive

solvents; since 1978, primarywaste engine oils andcontaminated diesel fuel.

23 SD23 SER Road oiling, POL waste prior to 1978 1950-early NMA PTAManchu Road included waste oils, 1980S

contaminated fuels, and spent Inactivesolvents; since 1978 primarywaste engine oils andcontaminated diesel fuel.

24 SD24 SER Road oiling, POL waste prior to 1978 1950-early NPA PTAGravel Haul included waste oils, 1980sRoad contaminated fuels, and spent Inactive

solvents; since 1978, primarywaste engine oils andcontaminated diesel fuel.

25 DP25 0U4 E-6 fuel tank Fuel with significant lead 1955-1980 RI/FS PTAsludge burial concentrations in sludge from Inactivepit periodic fuel storage tank

cleaning, buried in shallowvtrenches.

26 DP-26 0122 E-10 fuel tank Fuel in weathered sludge from 1955-1980 RI/PS PEAsludge burial periodic fuel storage tank Inactivepit cleaning, buried in pit. Table 3

Source Summary Table (Continued)

9

Souam WIMS-ES Class Material Date of RegulatoryNo. ID Source Alias Grouping Description Disposed Of Operation Status Mechanism

27 S127 0U4 E-11 fuel Weathered sludge, possibly Prior to 1980 RI/FS EPAstorage tank containing lead, buried between Inactivearea fuel tanks at the E-11 fuel

storage area.

28 DP28 SER Fly ash disposal Temporary storage of fly ash 197241977 NFA EPAfrom central heating and Inactivepowerplant.

29 DP29 SER Drum burial 400 to 500 drums and residue 1965-1968 Si EPAsite containing asphalt emulsion, Inactive

engine oils, and solvents; somefull drums of asphalt emulsion.

30 SS30 SER PCB storage Ponnerly stored PCB-containing Unknown NFA PEAarea, Building materials including out-of-service Inactive2339 transformiers and capacitors, and

PCB-contaminated soil andliquid from cleanup of PCB spill.

31 SS31 SER PCB storage Formerly stored PCB-containing Unknown NFA EPAarea, Building material including out-of-service Inactive3424 transformers and capacitors, and

PG-~contaminatedl spill andliquid from cleanup of PCB spill.

32 WP32 SER Sewage Ponds provide additional contact Since 1979 Si PEAtreatment plant time for chlorination of primary Inactivespill treated effluent; also serve as

diversion ponds for POL spills;major spill of unknown industrialchemical or solvent reported in1975.

33 WP33 SER Treated Infiltration pond receives treated Since 1978 Si EPAeffluent effluent from wastewater Inactiveinfiltration treatment plant year-round.pond

34 WP34 (not EPA) Sewage sludge Discharge of digested sludge Since 1953 Si FFA-drying beds from industrial wastewater, may Active

contain industrial contaminantssuch as heavy metals.

35 SS35 0U4 Asphalt mixing Mixing are for asphalt and base Early 1950& to RI/PS PEAarea for road oiling operation; late 1960s

comingied waste oils and Inactivesolvents mixed withcontaminated fuels; possibledisposal of 200 empty asphaltdrums at site.

36 SS36 0124 Drum storage Tar, asphalt emulsion, waste oils, Late 1960s to RI/ES EPAsite and contaminated fuel used for mid-1970s

road maintenance and road Inactiveoiling southeast of Buildings6213 and 6215 possibly leaks orspills from drums of waste oils,hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, andother POLs stored at the site.

Table 3Source Sunmmay Ta~ble (Continued)

10

SourceSource WIMS-ES Class Material Date of Regulatory

No. ID Source Alias Grouping Description Disposed Of Operation Status Mechanism

37 S537 0U4 Drum storage, Mixng are for asphalt and 1950s RI/PS PEAasphalt mixing staging are for road oiling Inactiveare possible leaks from tank

containing tar and asphaltemulsion; waste oils andcontaminated fuel; and drums ofwaste oil, diesel fuel, .JP-4 andPD-680.

38 WP3S 0U6 Ski lodge well Are contains old fuel storage Late 1950s RI/FS PFAcontamination tank ame; pit for disposal of to 1970

contaminated fuel and sludge. Inactive

39 SS39 0U4 Asphalt lake Asphalt emulsion leaked from Late 1940s RI/FS PEAseveral hundred rusted drums Inactiveover 1-acr area; drums andmiscellaneous debris embeddedin soft tar to depth of 6 to 12inches.

40 DP40 SE3R Powerplant Received residue from air Unknown NEA PEAsludge pit scrvbbers; periodically received Inactive

small quantities of sludge fromacid treatment and cleaning ofboilers.

41 SS41 SER Old auto hobby Waste oil and contaminated fuel Prior to 1982 NrA PEAshop from 55-gallon drums; small Inactive

quantities of industrial solvents.

42 SS42 SER Miscellaneous Site used for burial of empty 1960s NFA PEAstorage and drums and containers; possible Inactivedisposal are small quantities of POL waste,

including solvents, as residue indrums.

43 LE43 (Not PEA) Asbestos Permitted site for disposal of Since May NPA PEFA'landfill construction rubble containing 1982

asbestos. Inactive

44 DP44 0U3 Battery shop Battery shop solvents possibly Unknown RI/FS EPAleach field, drained to leach fields. Inactivebuilding

45 WP45 0UJ3 Photo lab, Photo chemicals discharged to Unknown RI/FS PEABuilding 1183 dry well; trichloroethene, Inactive

benzene, and other solventspresent in nearby groundwater.

46 SS46 (Not EPA) KC-135 crash KC-135 crash; fuel consumed in 1962 NPA FFA'site, Gate 2 fire. Inactive

47 SS47 SER Commissary Fuel-contamninated soil in Unknown Si PEAparking lot fuel parking lot found at a depth of 9 Statusspill feet in 1987; parking lot covers unknown

150,000 square feet.

48 STr48 OUt Powerplant fuel Gasoline and diesel possibly Unknown RI/FS PEAspill from abandoned 3-inch pipelines Inactive

near the base powerplant.

49 Sr49 OUl Building 1300 Diesel fuel for generator Unknown RI/FS PEAUIST spill site discharged through floor drains Inactive

in combat alert hangar complex

to septic system leach field.Tal3

Source Summary Table (Continued)

Source WINIS-ES Class Material Date of RegulatoryNoM ED Source Alias Grouping Description Disposed Of Operation Status Mechanism

50 5550 Out Blair Lakes vehicle Heating oil spill at storage Unknown RI/FS PEAmaintenance tank, and abandoned buried Inactive

fuel lines; near water supplywell for Blair takes vehiclemaintenance building.

51 5551 OUt Blair Lakes ditch Diesel fuel from unknown 1986 RI/FS WFAsource floating as 1/2-inch Inactivelayer in ditch.

52 SS52 oul Blair Lakes diesel Diese fuel spill from failure of Unknown RI/FS EPAspill 1 14-inch diameter pipe Inactive

connecting main diesel fuelStorage tanks to 550-gallonabove-ground day tanks nearvehicle maintenance buildingand generator facility.

53 SS53 Out Blair Lakes fuel Unknown quantity of Unknown RI/FS WFAspill helicopter fuel spilled on pad Inactive

of shed that houses dlefuelingpumping equipment.

54 DP54 OUt Blair Lakes dnum Full and partially full drums of Unknown RI/ES PEAdisposal site unknown material buried west Inactive

of main Blair takes facility.

55 DP55 SER Birch Lakes burial General refuse and suspected Unknown Si WFAsite drums of waste oil and other Inactive

hazardous materials.

56 STS6 SER Engineer Hill fuel Diesel spill of unknown 1990 Si PEAspill area quantity at boiler plant. Inactive

57 ST57 0U13 Fire station parking Unknown. Unknown RI/ES WFAlot Inactive

58 ST5S SElR Old OM senvice .Possible releases from above- Unknown Si WFAstation ground tanks. Inactive

59 ST'59 (Not EPA) Dining ball Diesel spill; contaminated soil Unknown NEA WFAS

has been remnoved. Inactive

60 WP60 SER New auto hobby Water from oil/water separator Unknown Si PEAshop drains to leach field; oils Inactive

overwhelm leach field.

61 SS61 SERl Vehicle Oil from oil/waiter seprator is Unknown Si WFAmaintenance, released to leach field. ActiveBuilding 3213

62 SS62 SERl Garrison Slough Possibly contaminated Not NEA WFAgroundwater and surface runoff applicablefrom site.

63 SS63 SEll Asphalt Lake spill Suspected pesticide spill; DDT, Unknown Si EPAsite DDE, DDD found in soil. Inactive

64 SS64 SEll Trans maintenance Former staging are for Unknown NFA WFA

r -- IP Sie notinclded i FFA spill site hazardous materials. Inactive

Table 3Source Summary Table (Concluded)

12

L0 0 o0N ~~~ -a-. 0 .4-~0 i , cc

-~~ CC) o a - . o C- o cC 0 CaLi~ V0 ~ ~ 0 .-

tz 0 V~~~~~~~~~~~~ )4o > o o C) EL C o 4 0 . 4

U) m 0 ' , 4 4 '.- U

0 -C ~~~~- a 00 I. 0 r-J

4, 0 V ~ U) C '< Li 0 a

Z 0 0 .c . , C £c co- .. U

7 0 C P~~~_ n A~

<C 0

~ 00, ~ 0052 I > 0- a o h E0'

U)DIf - Fl- N *( DMLP.j'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>oor < 2-2~~~~~~~~~~~

0~~~~ -v ~ ~ ~0 0 , 4,N

0 - 4,

_~ ~ 0 0C -. C.C

C C C m 4 Q C. . F- u.) H 0 4'C

0 0 0I 0 - 4) V 4 V) V - )LI VLi ) U) o' a, c

V 0 V C E-mm Uo a

a: 0• Id U) Li 0 0. IVU) H ) < 0 0 U) 0 0

0

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i

0 .4

0 0

*5 <~~~~~~~~~~

Li ~~ ~~0 V U

C ~~C 4 ,..ra..

0 r-. Ca + CY4 ~0 a C 4 0 LI

0 0 ~ ~ i 'N .0 00

co V) 4' t ) 5 0 )

C C C 0 4' Li. C m

0 0 = i 0i .~ .4-' - I _ 0 Ifl E 1 0 -

C 0~~~~~~~~~~O C 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

V~~~~~~~~~~

~~.. a U) ~ 0 0• I.. 0 -N-o V V V iS 4) 4, Li -~~~~~~~~ 4 N ±• 0 C I 0 o o!

_ 4 .. Az I ~ ti I 0 = 4

o o 0 0 0 0 H L IL U) IL -, i) U) ~~ 0 0 , 0• 0

E©

IRiP Sources

As shown in Table 3 and Figure 2, there are 64 identified sources on Eielson AFB. Of these 64 identifiedsources there are 28 sources that are combined into six operable units under the PEA; 32 sources that arebeing investigated under the SER process under the EPA; and 4 sources that are not included in the EFAbut are being addressed under the IRP process.

3.1.2Installation-Wide Source Discovery/Assessment Status

All known sources (identified to date) on Eielson AFH, have been addressed in the draft site-wide mRI/SManagement Plan dated 17 June 1991. Currently, there are no points of interest (POls); any POls that areidentified in the future will be addressed according to the HIP process. Table 4 summarizes the removal andinterim actions for the known source areas.

Source No. Action Purpose Status

ST2O, ST48, ST49, IRA OUl18 Remove floating product. Trenches, skimming systems5550, 5551. being installed at ST2O (E-9)SS52,S5553 and SS50-53 in FY 92.

SS39,S5563 Removed Asphalt, Close site. Did final samplings; someCement, and Drums detection of TPH and

kernosene.

0 ~~~~ ~~LE0l Remove drums Close site. Started in FY 92; Complete inWY' 93.

WP34, S539, SS63 Asphalt reuse Combines asphalt and Completed base course FY 92;cement with diesel lay final cold mix using dieselcontaminated soils to make contaminated soils inroad base. WY 93.

WP32 Excavation Removed diesel Will be completed in FY 93 ascontaminated soil from Sewage Treatment Plantunderground storage tank MILCON progresses.site.

ST48 Vacuum extraction Remove floating product System installed; will operateand biovent. in WY 93.

ST2O (E-7) Bioventing Remove petroleum On-going technologyhydrocarbons in the "smear" demonstration.zone.

STIO Bioventing Bioventing 50' x 50' plot. On-going technologyInitiative demonstration.

Table 4Removal and Interim Action Status

14

3.2Compliance Program Status

Environmental Compliance activities at Eielson AFB are being conducted in coordination with environmental0restoration activities under the IRP. Compliance activities as shown in Table S address underground andaboveground storage tanks, hazardous materials/waste management, closure of active RCRA units, asbestos,radon, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and water discharges. These are briefly summarized below.

Project Status Regulatory_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Program

Underground Storage 0 Total UISTs: 51 Alaska USTTanks * UISTs in use: 51 ProgramFlightline (pumphouse) S UISTs pickled: 0

* UISTs removed: 07* USTs tobe removed in FY93: 35* Additional UST investigations required: 2* 40 USTs/ASTs to be leak tested in FY93

Hazardous The Base has an HM/HW Plan that was implemented on 01 Alaska RCRA

Materials/Waste March 1992. Operations under this plan assure the HM/HW Program

Management users on Eielson AFB comply with all Federal, State of Alaska,Air Force, and Local regulations concerning the generation anddisposal of HM/HW.

HM/HW generators are allowed three days from the time adisposal drum is filled to deliver the properly marked and sealeddrum to the Base Hazardous Material Holding and RecyclingFacility. The Base then has 90 days in which to transport anddispose of the HM/HW through the Defense Reutilization and

_________________ Marketing Office (DRMO).

Closure of Active Active RCRA units include: Alaska RCRA0RCRA Units 0 Current solid waste landfill: North Star Borough Landfill Program

(Off base)* Defense Reutilization Marketing Office Accumulation

Points: I* Hazardous Waste Storag Areas: I* Oil water separators: 52

Asbestos Testing/Removal Installation-wide survey for friable asbestos-containing material Air Force Policycompleted during FY 92. The existing asbestos managementplan to minimize asbestos risks was reviewed, updated and

____________________ approved on 02 September_1992.

Radon Testing Radon screening of living quarters, administrative areas was Air Force Radoncompleted during FY 9 1. All survey results were below EPA's Assessment andrecommended mitigation level. Mitigation

Program

PCB Storage All electrical transformers were tested for PCBs early in FY 92. TSCAInspection/Removal Six transformers that were found to be PCB contaminated were Regulations, EPA

flushed and retested during the FY 92 construction season. Of Policythe six flushed, four tested clean and two will be drained andrefilled during the FY 93 construction season.

NPDES Sampling Routine(quarterly) sampling and reporting for discharge NPDES Perniteffluents at two outfalls.I

Compliance and Closure-Related Taolects

15

3.2.1Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) and Flightfine

Eight underground storage tanks were removed during FY 92 and site closure is anticipated for all but oneof the tanks by the end of FY 93. The tank at Building 1307 will be closed during FY 94. Thirty-five liSTsare scheduled to be replaced during FY 93.

Two major military construction projects are programmed to begin in FY 93, Hydrant Refueling on OscarRow and base wide Underground Fuel Storage Expansion.

An additional FY 93 project, Leak Test USTs, will be performed to install leak detection systems on 40different above and below ground tank systems. This project is the first of its kind for large bulk storagetanks.

3.2.2Solid Waste, Asbestos, PCBs, NPDES Permit, Other

A Refuse Derived Fuel Project is programmed to be designed in FY 93 with construction projected for FY94 to reduce the amount of solid waste taken to the landfill. The Base has an on-going recycle program foraluminum cans, metals and paper.

The Base has established and is maintaining an Asbestos Monitoring and Maintenance Program. They haveconducted an asbestos survey of all facilities and performed abatement or encapsulation of asbestos asdeemed necessary. The Base also provides monitoring, surveillance, and quality assurance for asbestosremoval/disposal during construction.

The Base has conducted a survey of all PCB related areas. All but two electrical transformers found to havePCBs have been purged and declared PCB free. The two transformers in Building 11238 are scheduled to beretrofitted during the FY 93 construction season.

A Hazardous Material/Hazardous Waste (HM/HW) Management Plan has been written and is used toensure compliance to all Federal, State, and Local regulations concerning the use, minimization, handling,and disposal of HM/HW.

3.3Status of Community Involvement

Community relations activities that have taken place at Eielson AFB to date include the following:

E FA Process. The EFA for Eielson AFB was prepared by the Air Force and signed by the Air Force,EPA, and ADEC in May 1991. This agreement establishes a schedule for completing CERCLAdocuments and activities associated with the cleanup of 28 sources within six operable units at the base.The FFA also states that 32 additional sources are being addressed under the Source Evaluation Reportprocess.

Community Relations Plan. The Eielson AFB Community Relations Plan (CRP) was approved forpublic release on 26 August 1991. The CRP was prepared by the Air Force and is currently beingimplemented under the direction of the Air Force RPM. The plan provided background informationabout the regulatory process, the Site, the surrounding community, and current community concerns andinformation needs regarding environmental cleanup work. Based on this information, the plan outlined aprogram of activities to be conducted to keep the public informed of Site work and provide opportunitiesfor public input in cleanup decisions. This helps to comply with the intent of the Superfund communityinvolvement process. An update of the community relations plan is to be published during the summerof 1993.

16

*Administration Record/Information Repositories. The public has access to information regarding theBase through two collections: the Administrative Record and the Information Repository. The originaladministrative record rile is located at the Eielson AFB Environmental Office in Building 2258. By law,the administrative record must contain all documents used to form the basis for the selection of acleanup action under CERCLA.

A duplicate administrative record is located at the Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Archives Section,University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska.

An Information Repository is located at the Elmer E. Rasmuson Library, Arctic and Polar RegionArchives Section, and a second Information Repository is located at the Noel Wien Library, both inFairbanks, Alaska.

Information Repository Handbooks containing the Community Relations Plan, Fadt Sheets, and an indexof administrative record and informnation repository documents are on file at the Eielson AFB Library,North Pole Library, North Pole, Alaska, and the Alaska Department of Environmental ConservationOffice, Fairbanks, Alaska.

*Technical Review Committee. The Technical Review Committee reviews actions and plans to coordinateCERCLA/IRP with the public and regulatory agencies. This provides members with an opportunity toreview and comment on cleanup actions, suggest improvements or identify problems, advise the Basedecision makers of alternative points of view on proposed actions, and to yield the best possible courseof cleanup action. The TRC shall consist of representatives from the United States Air Force; theUnited States Environmental Protection Agency Region 10; the Alaska Department of EnvironmentalConservation; commumity representatives from North Pole, Fairbanks, and the University of AlaskaFairbanks; and other members as approved by the TRC.

*Base Mailing List. The Base Mailing List contains the names of about 150 concerned citizens; Federal,State, and Local officials; news media representatives; environmental interest groups and communityorganizations. The mailing list is maintained by the installation and updated regularly. Throughout thecleanup process, mailing list individuals and organizations periodically receive community relationsmaterials, such as fact sheets, newsletters, and meeting announcements.

* Official Newsletter. THE EJELSON ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP REPORTis preparedsemiannually to keep the public informed of the status of environmental cleanup activities at the Base.The initial issue dated October 1991 described the Site history and the Eielson AFB InstallationRestoration Program, included Operable Unit Descriptions, and addressed issues including AssessingRisk to the Public, the Innovative Technology Demonstration Project, the Eielson Community RelationsProgram, Current Activities, Public Access to Information, and Key Base Contacts. The second issuedated June 1992 addressed the Results from 1991/Plans Made for 1992, described InnovativeTechnologies being Demonstrated, identified Base Environmental Personnel, continued CommunityRelations Program, and listed Key Base Contacts. A third issue was published in December 1992.

* Fact Sheets. In 1991 a fact sheet was prepared and distributed to individuals and organizations on themailing list describing the Innovative Technology Demonstration Program which demonstrated andevaluated three potential cleanup methods including cold weather composting, vacuum extraction, andbioventing. Two fact sheets were published in 1992. The frwst described the Technical Assistance GrantProgram, which is intended to help the public make informed decisions related to site-specific cleanupstrategies. The second fact sheet, Environmental Cleanup Work Opportunities at Eielson Air ForceBase, detailed who can do Eielson cleanup work, how local individuals and companies might becomeinvolved, and where to go for more information.

17

Public Meetings. Public meetings will be held approximately every six months to inform the public ofthe Site activities and status of the cleanup. Public meetings will be held during public comment periodson proposed plans. The meetings will provide an opportunity for interested parties to submit written orverbal comments on the proposed plans. At the end of the comment period, the Air Force will preparea Responsiveness Summary responding to public comments that is submitted as part of the Record ofDecision.

* Technical Assistance Grants. The United States Congress included provisions in the SuperfundAmendments and Reauthorization Act to establish a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG). The TAG isintended to help the public make informed decisions related to specific cleanup strategies. The TAGprogram provides funds for qualified citizen groups to hire independent technical advisors to help themunderstand and comment on technical factors in cleanup decisions that affect them. A group can receivea TAG if its members may be affected by a release or threatened release of toxic wastes at Eielson AFB.

3.4Environmental Condition of Property

Eielson AFB has been categorized into three types of areas based on current knowledge of theenvironmental conditions:

* areas of known contamination are subdivided into areas with contaminant concentrations above actionlevels (media-specific risk-based or standards-based benchmarks) and those with concentrations belowaction levels and requiring no further action;

* areas of no suspected contamination have been defined during PA/SI or RI/FS activities or otherenvironmental programs; and

* unevaluated areas are those areas on Base that have not been fully investigated to date. These areasmust undergo further evaluation to determine into which of the categories they can be classified withcertainty. Currently, Eielson AFB has no unevaluated areas.

Figure 3 summarizes the status of information on the environmental condition of installation property interms of the above categories. This figure is based on a detailed large-scale map that shows knowledge todate. To minimize clutter, monitor wells and other sample locations are not shown on the map.

3.4.1Areas of Known Contamination

Areas of known contamination are delineated in Figure 3 and are based upon PA/SI and RI findings to date.Contaminated areas on Figure 3 encompass contaminant sources and their migration via exposure pathwaysinto the environment. Contaminated areas have been subdivided based upon the average concentration ofhazardous substance, pollutants, or contaminants present. Several areas contain concentrations of releasedsubstances above action levels (e.g., risk-based or standards-based benchmarks), while others containconcentrations of released substances below action levels. The boundaries of these areas are dynamic andwill be adjusted in accordance with the results of ongoing and planned sampling. Large-scale maps of eachsource areas are maintained by Eielson AFB.

18

Areas of No Suspected Contamination

Areas of No Suspected Contamination (ANSC) and No Further Action (NFA) Areas are delineated inFigure 3 and are based upon the following types of assessment:

* a review of past and current activities in ANSCs and NFA Areas specific to the use of hazardousmaterials or other chemicals. This includes a review of historical records relating to the ANSC or NFAArea, and an analysis of historical aerial photographs. No evidence of potential contamination wasindicated;

* interviews have been conducted with over 40 community members and dozens of current employees,former employees, and other individuals who might have personal knowledge of any contamination ofany Eielson AFB property that is either declared an area of no suspected contamination or a no furtheraction area. No interviewees had any additional knowledge of any practices in these areas that mighthave caused contamination;

*visual site inspections conducted from 1986 to present by various contractors that noted the condition ofexisting facilities, topographic patterns, evidence of environmental impacts, or other observationsindicative of an actual or potential release. None were found. This process is still on-going under theremedial investigation and community involvement process;

* sampling data associated with all relevant PA/SI or RI efforts. All validated sampling data were reportedas "non-detects" for all sampled analytes;

* results of investigations are found in the SER. This document describes the SER process to evaluatesource areas rapidly, without the long costly RI/FS process for sites which show little or no risk or noexposure pathway.

Large-scale maps of these areas, supplemented with sampling data, are maintained at the Eielson AFBAdministrative Record.

3.4.3Unevaluated Areas

As shown on Figure 3 there are currently no areas of suspected contamination on Eielson AFB that have notbeen evaluated and designated as either NFA or placed in the PEA process. Any areas that are identified inthe future will be discussed at Project Team meetings, and determinations will be made whether there isneed for fuirther characterization or whether the area can be listed as NFA. When an area of knowncontamination is addressed through the implementation of a response action, the Base will modify Figure 3to reflect its change in status.

19

0' V1 0 4

0 C

- 0) 4 C 00 0 - 00 .20

m Ua) 0 0 .C o U

_ -) 0 C) S U)- -~~ IL 0 -i ' -F, '-N 0

~ -W = 0 C . it 4) -2 C U) 5*0 0 0 xac ±.a0 _0

C m t0 , I o .0 v 0' a 0.- ai C

o C . 0 - C )

U) 0 LFL' -

0 -~~ L0' 0 0 0 r

.2o c .2.2.2.2.2 4-' o~, E C C )

W H<cna c) 0 am - mm - -u L ~ - -- V O 1I

ci 4 7,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~04

4, 0) 0

t ~~ 0) t 0

0 ') =0 n' J

~ o 4, 0' *c c a

> 0' I~ L. M

0 0 m LIm 000 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 4

C - 4E E,0 C - ? . E ' U

0' 0' I IN C,') kN 0' 0 2) -nn 0 X 0 C I

C C C - di di fl ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 0 L- 4- L- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- ~~~~ 0V

- 4 ,L t L ~ 0 0 ' .2 .

~ ~ V C - - , 0 04- U U 75 -) U)

a Li~~~~~~~~~~

4/) .2~~~~ij

V) U

0 CY~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L

0~~~~~ 0

EEC~~~~~~~~~~ 0

D a l l o~~~% 4)t a. -~i' - & -1

C) E> a Z5 0 LE iz w I~~L L C , 0 of i

.2E EH( ( E 4- j -9-F4-[-~ El 0 0 U) I 0

4.) C C 0 IL~~~~~ ,ee

t o 5 *~~~~~~~ .~~~ .E .2 = a 0 ~~~~~~~~~~ 4f

0' 0' 4-4 U) 0 -0

I.- (5 4' = 0'~~~~~~~

4- -,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~

at N 2 U) V IL 4, C~~C-JLE 2 . L1 0 E .5?t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~

* Chapter 4Installation-Wide Strategy for Envfromnental Restoration

The purpose of this chapter is to summarize the installation-wide environmental restoration and compliancestrategy for Eielson AFB.

4.1Zone/Operable Unit Designation and Strategy

4.1.1Zone Designations

Ejelson AFB does not have any designated zones. All investigative strategy is performed uinder the operableunit strategy.

4.1.2Operable Unit Designations

Twenty-eight source areas have been consolidated into six operable units (OU) on Eielson AFB. Anoperable unit is a unit in which similar types of contamination sources have been grouped together, based onsimilarities of types of contaminants present, source locations, or types of remedial actions anticipated. Thefollowing describes each OU and the sources it comprises. Figure 5 shows the operable units composition

and deliverable dates.

Operable Unit 1. Eight sources that have petroleum, oils, lubricants (POL) contamination with floatingproduct are included in Operable Unit 1. Condition of the area is considered to be well characterizedbecause of field investigations conducted in 1989.

* Source 20 ST'20 Refueling Loop Fuel-Saturated Area (WAP-).* Source 48 ST48 Powerplant Fuel Spill (Gasoline & Diesel).

* Source 49 ST49 Building 1300 UST Spill Site (Diesel).* Source 50 SS50 Blair Lakes Vehicle Maintenance Building (Heating Oil).* Source 51 S551 Blair Lakes Ditch (Diesel).* Source 52 SS52 Blair Lakes Diesel Spill (Diesel).* Source 53 SS53 Blair Lakes Fuel Spill (Helicopter Fuel).* Source 54 DP54 Blair Lakes Drum Disposal Site (Unknown Material).

Operable Unit 2.Seven sources which have POL contamination with floating product are included inOperable Unit 2. However, because the last field investigations were conducted in these areas in 1988, thecurrent condition of the area is considered to be less well characterized than those in Operable Unit 1.

* Source 10 ST1O E-2 POL Storage (MOGAS and JP-4).*Source 11 ST11 Fuel Saturated Area (Diesel).* Source 13 ST13 E-4 Diesel Fuel Spill (Diesel and MOGAS).* Source 14 SS14 E-2, RR JP-4 Spill Area (JP-4).* Source 18 ST18 Oil Holler Fuel Saturated Area (Diesel).

* Source 19 ST19 JP-4 Fuel Line Spill Area (JP-4).

* Source 26 DP26 E-10 Fuel Tank Sludge Burial Pit (Fuel Sludge).

21

Operable Unit 3. Three sources that have primarily solvent contamination, particularly trichloroethene

comprise Operable Unit 3. TCE plumes are known.

*Sources4 DP44 Battery Shop Leach Field Building (Solvents).*Source 45 WP45 Photo Lab, Building 1183 (Photo Chemicals).*Source 57 ST57 Fire Station Parking Lot (Unknown).

Operable Unit 4. The six sources that were used for land disposal of sludge, storage drums, and asphalt areincluded in Operable Unit 4.

* Source 25 DP25 E-6 Fuel Tank Sludge Burial Pit (Fuel Sludge).*Source 27 S'127 E-11 Fuel Storage Tank Area (Fuel Sludge).*Source 35 SS35 Asphalt Mixing Area (Asphalt, Waste Oils, Solvents and Fuels).*Source 36 SS36 Drum Storage Site (Tar, Asphalt, Waste Oils and Fuels).*Source 37 SS37 Drum Storage, Asphalt Mixing Area (Asphalt, Diesel, JP-4).* Source 39 SS39 Asphalt Lake (Asphalt Cement).

Operable Unit 5. The three sources that involve landfills and potential areas of nearby soil contaminationcomprise Operable Unit 5.

*Source 3 LFO3 Current Base Landfill (Refuse, Oils, Solvents, Paints).*Source 4 LF04 Old Army Landfill & EOD Area (Refuse, Scrap Materials/Drumns).*Source 9 FTO9 Fire Training Area (JP-4)

Operable Unit 6. There is one source for Operable Unit 6. It has been set aside for separate investigationbecause it is in fractured bedrock, as opposed to sand and silt geology seen in other sources.

* Source 38 WP38 Ski Lodge Well Contamination (Fuels, Sludge).

4.1.3

Sequence of OUs

The sequence of operable units are as follows: OUIB, OU6B, 0U2, OUI, 0U6, 0U3, 0U4, and OU5.See Figure 6. OU1B and OU6B are interim actions which will be accomplished first to remove the floatingproduct on the groundwater at the source. The sequence for the other operable units was determined byfirst working on the source area where there is fuel on the groundwater, then moving on to source areas forlandfills, buried asphalt drums, etc.

4.1.4Removal Actions and Treatability Studies

Removal actions and treatability studies planned as part of the Eielson AFB environmental restorationstrategy are summarized in Table 6.

22

E0~~~~~~~

0 Cc~~~~~~'OIL I~~~~~~~~~0

0 IL] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0

>0 g~~~[0

* nfl- fbI-----~~~---- --------- I992--------- ------------- 19M------------- ------- I.--- W--------- ------------ u---------Mot0 78 10 1112 1 2 3 4 5 SO '0 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 1112 1 2 3 4 5 S 9 0101I1 12 1 2 3 4 5 S 7 9 010 1112

OU I A00A ----- AD

ouls R__ _ __ _s00 ----

OU4 W N.FtFS "-r

ou 5 W~~~~*5 ft.FS - RO M-F

LeaendMP - Managem~ent PlanRI - Remtedial InvestigationFS - Feesublilly StudyPP - Proposed PlanRD - Remedial DesignROD - Record of Decision

Figure 6St rategy and lPrimary Document 1meclne for Operable Units at Elelson APR

Site Number Action Objective 'rune Frame

OMl Removal of petroleum products Conduct early action to Record of Decision signed infloating on top of the water significantly reduce the volume June 1992. Remediation totable. of the floating petroleum be started next construction

product on top of the water season.table.

OU6B Removal of petroleum products Conduct an early action to Record of Decision isfloating on top of water in a remove fuel product from scheduled to be signed Junedrinking water well at the foot drinking water well. 1993.of the ski hill.

Site Number Treatability Desciption Objective rime Frame

oul. Innovative Technology Demonstrate and evaluate three FY 92 and 93.Demonstration. potential cleanup methods,

trenching for removal of POL,vacuum extraction, bioventing.

STSS Innovative Technology Cold weather composting. FY 93Demonstration.

S ~~Tabled6Planned Removal Actions and Treatability Studies

24

4.1.5Community Relations Strategy

Community relations help the Air Force support remedy selection during the cleanup process, the proposedplan, the RI/FS, and supporting analysis. This information is included in the administrative record andinformation repositories and is available for public comment. At least a 30-day comment period is providedfor the proposed cleanup actions. The comment period will be announced two weeks in advance in localnewspapers. The comments are then documented in a Responsiveness Summary which is submitted with theRecord of Decision. This document describes the communities' comments and Air Force's responses. Thecomplete ROD is placed in the administrative record file and the information repositories with a notice ofavailability published in the local newspapers. A Community Relations Plan was prepared August 26, 1991.Included in this plan are the objectives of the community relations program, which are to:

*Assess existing community concerns regarding planned and ongoing studies at Eielson AFB, including allphases of cleanup activities, and determine how and when the public would like to be involved in thedecision making process.

* Establish procedures for accurate and timely release of information to potentially affected and interestedcitizen groups, elected officials, public interest groups, agency officials, and the media.

*Establish methods to facilitate communication between the Air Force and the community at large.

* Articulate and clarify key issues for the public regarding contamination at Eielson AFB.

* Be responsive to the needs and concerns of public interest groups, agency officials, and the media.

* Receive and understand al the information that the various interest groups have to communicate.S

* Search for a consensus on decisions that are being developed through the process.

Key community concerns and issues will be gauged through public interviews and questionnaires prepared by

Eielson AFE personnel. Other techniques for accomplishing community relations include:

* Developing the Site Mailing List

* Preparing Information Fadt Sheets

* Establishing Information Repositories and Administrative Records

* Holding Public Meetings

* Community Involvement to Support Selection of a Remedy

* Preparing the Record of Decision and Responsiveness Summary

The CRP responds to current community concerns. This is a dynamic process, since community concernsare expected to change over time. As the cleanup process progresses, the CRP will evolve to meet thepublic's changing information needs.

Superfund reauthorization legislation provides for Technical Assistance Grants to qualified citizen groupsaffected by Superfund sites. These grants will enable affected citizens to obtain independent expert technicaladvise in reviewing and assessing technical information produced during work at a remedial site.

25

* ~~4.1.6Remedy Selection Approach

Remedies will be selected in accordance with statutory and NCP criteria. The Eielson AFB Project Teamwill involve all parties in the remedy selection process who have an impact on the remedies selected at theBase. Particular attention will be given to the following during the evaluation of alternatives:

* Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). ARARs for anticipated RAs will befuly identified through Project Team meetings during the RI/ES process to define restoration goals.

* ARAR waivers. The effectiveness of alternatives in reducing concentrations of contaminants tochemical-specific ARARs will be evaluated. Waivers will be considered where treatment to standards istechnically impractical.

* Land use/risk assessment. Risk assessment protocols will incorporate future land use in exposurescenarios where future uses are known.

* Alternative concentration limits (ACLs). ACLs will be considered during the FS as groundwaterprotection standards to be applied at points of compliance for certain on-site plumes.

* Treatability studies. Effective treatability studies will be incorporated into RODs as a foundation forperformance-based remedial actions.

* Applicable remedies. The presumptive remedy selection approach advocated in EPA's 30-day study willbe applied in selected cases. In other cases, focused FSs will be developed for specific sites, especiallylandfills and debris piles.

The Eielson AFB RPM will hold several Project Team meetings early in the FS process to discussconceptual remedies with regulatory agencies to focus the scope of the FS for each source area or OU.

4.2Compliance Strategy

4.2.1Underground Storage Tanks

Eielson AFB's approach to managing USTs is to replace all USTs with above ground tanks, except thoseprecluded because of the mission or its operability. In 1993, approximately 35 USTs will be replaced throughtwo programmed military construction projects. At the completion of this project all regulated USTs will bein compliance with 40 CFR 280.

Two major military construction projects are programmed to begin in FY 93: FT0W933002-ADAI, HydrantRefueling, Oscar Row - $11,800K and FT0W93304, Underground Fuel Storage - S2,500K. Seven USTs wereremoved in FY 92 and site closure is anticipated to be achieved by the end of FY 93. Closure costs areestimated to be approximately $250K

There is an additional planned project to install leak detection systems on 40 different above and belowground tank systems. This project is the first of its kind for large bulk storage tanks. The project isFrQW927001, Leak Test USTs - $1,932K.

26

4.2.2Solid Waste, Asbestos, PCM, Other

Eielson AFB currently disposes of its solid waste at the North Star Borough's unlined sanitary landfill. Thislandfill is nearing capacity with a projected life expectancy of approximately five more years. To reduce solidwaste the Base has established a recycling program for aluminum cans, metals, and high grade paper. TheBase also has a Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Project, FTQW91-'7000, which is programmed to be completedas part of the FY 94 Pollution Prevention Program (PPP). Construction is currently programmed to becompleted in the summer of 1994 at an estimated cost of $1.4M. This project is designed to convertcombustible solid waste into burnable pellets, which will be mixed with coal and burned in the CentralHeating and Power Plant. The recycling program and the RDF Project in FY 94 under the PPP willpotentially reduce solid waste streams by 50%.

Asbestos is an ongoing concern for the Base since the majority of the facilities contain regulated asbestos-containing materials. All buildings on the Base have been surveyed. Eielson AFB currently has a permittedasbestos landfill used by the government and its contractors. An Asbestos Management and Operations Planhas been written to establish management and organizational responsibilities and measures which ensure thatno personnel in Base facilities are exposed to hazardous levels of airborne asbestos fibers.

Eielson AFB recently had six PCB transformers that were purged and four of the six transformers werereclassified as PCB free. The remaining two transformers are scheduled to be purged a second time duringthe FY 93 construction season. The transformers will then be retested to determine if they are PCB free.

A Hazardous Material and Waste Management Plan was written for the Eielson AFB in March 1992. Thisplan requires compliance with all Federal, State, and Local regulations concerning hazardous material/wastemanagement. Hazardous Material/Waste Management has 48 different generation/accumulation points. InFY 92, over 1.2 million pounds of hazardous wastes were disposed of. Over half originated from the sandblasting of lead primed bulk storage tanks. Eielson AFB manages their hazardous waste without aid of anEPA permit. The main accumulation point processes and ships all of the base's waste to the DefenseReutilization Marketing Office within the allotted 90 day time frame. The facility minimizes waste byrecycling solvents (MEK and PD 680) and is currently upgrading its recycling capabilities to begin recyclingantifreeze. Beginning in FY 93, the Base will initiate closure plans for four past and one current RCRAunit. These closure plans are expected to take two years to complete.

27

* Chapter 5Environmental Restoration/Compliance Program Master Schedule

This chapter presents the Eielson AFB Master Schedule of anticipated activities in the environmentalrestoration and compliance programs. These schedules are simplified from detailed network and operationalschedules developed to support site-specific work plans and compliance agreements. Planned responseactivities are graphically summarized in Figure 7. Compliance activities are summarized in Figure 8. AProject Team subject/meeting schedule is provided in Table 7.

5.1Installation Restoration Program

5.1.1Response Schedules

The assumptions in the RI/FS schedule for the Eielson AFB are as follows:

* The Draft Management Plan is written (60 days), reviewed (30 days), revised (30 days), and becomes

final (30 days) and then is submitted as a Final Management Plan;

* The RI/ES Draft Report is written (10-23 months), reviewed (30 days), revised (30 days), and submittedfinal (30 days);

O . ~~The ROD draft is written (60 days), reviewed (30 days), revised (30 days), and signed by regulators (30days);

* Remedial Design/Action takes place immediately upon completion of ROD.

5.1.2

Requirements by Fiscal Year

Environmental restoration activities at Eielson AFB are funded by the Defense Environmental RestorationAccount (DERA). Details of DERA funding requests for Eielson APE are provided in the FundingRequirement table presented in Appendix A.

5.2Compliance

5.2.1

Compliance Schedules

The compliance schedule for compliance activities at Eielson AFB is shown in Figure 8.

5.2.2Requirements by Fiscal Year

Details of requested DElRA funding and Environmental Compliance Program activities are provided in the* ~~Funding Requirement tables presented in Appendix A.

28

5.3Project Team Meeting Schedule

Table 7 lists the dates and topics for Project Team meetings that are anticipated during the next 3 months.

Date Location Topic Participants Lead

7-10 Dec 92 Eielson AFB SER, RIIFS EPA, ADEC Julie Stringer

Table 7Project Team Meeting Schedule

29

I.. �h

�ttw0'-

cc

Q 0)L.. �0. $

C

N

3 3 3

.3. 1 1 1

I.- �'

I IL Lrl ii:

Ia:N El I -A

:2 :1' 3ii:

��11� �A IV LA.

_______ Ei ,I1: I-_____ ___ _____ I!o 4: iA I 4:o �I WI II

-0 EOII V

I a,

LI II! I IC �: II

Iii I iiU

N U 1______ ii: 4 ____ ______ ___________ ____ ______

N II I I I w1 II I Io I I I I II I I I I II I I MI ii

I I I I .E 'II II LA.

0 i: I I0:3 S Ri I1o' I 12 .33-: j: U: ii:

9:*1: A: , II I aI j I IN I I I I

I I_________ _______________________ I I

C I -

- I U

-� .31 .33�

41 Ii* I

1.11

N1

Uta

3 - NI *1

A' II______ ________________ ____________ I I

i�e0�

t

6(3ab

CSCa'3aSI.

0�

* N

r

H�:II

InI I

It IIII

to I IIN I'

IIII

- - m SI III2 FII 0

a g C)gin � 0*

flI ft

� U,�

A�:S

lo oI�**I� 0CsSo

V -r; Ti. -

S *0-D I-0- I�l* S

:2 �7 0.,� 'L, ' ICga, *� I. 9 1.2

�,- 5t-I Lw * t Ii

a-w 0 0 0I * * �IuIn I 2 �

I' h� tIE,� 0

to 'a:. * * oa5.-�'kill ' '4 -IN I �2;'o

*�- g�I -U.

a: -I-�4E-�- -�--r---

Sg

02 2;

Ia, I�O 11111

gin igl Ii 11111IIgil-i 0 -r I gill

I� 111= 2 III'

I ggl I: tIll I

IN ggI� 0 j� '4 gill I.2 ilIll

r LJj. -s . -o---- 1111 II - Sgil .3 i�j * gill' I

11I I I C 11111 I'2 ggl I V 11111I II I I �. 11111

I I I* I 11111Ia, I I g I

I gc�Ir. Ia I I

I I I 0

It II gI I

'to £

IN I Ig I 0 I

I g I I I

g Ig I *I * 1 I *

'2 I I I *I I I

I * .

a-0 I

: *

I IIt I1

C)I IIN I

ii>-0

I

b

S*1.i :� -0I I -

0 a 0 £0

U 00 0. z �

* Chapter 6Technical and Other Issues to be Resolved

The following subsections identify technical and/or other issues which require action in order to be resolved.

The issues identified below in some way or another impact current or will impact future restoration activities.

6.1Data Usability

All existing IRP documents and data are reviewed and analyzed to validate existing data and to identify anyand all data gaps that might require additional fieldwork.

6.2Information Management at Eielson AFB

Eielson APR uses the Swansong Computer System which will be broken into four major modules and will beinterfaced by a common graphic user interface. The four modules are: a geographical information system(GIS), a video archival system, a text archival system, and a library of data visualization modules. Initially,Swansong will be a small network of two to five Sun Sparc stations in the Civil Engineering Building used forthe storage of basewide environmental and construction data. Later, Swansong may become a basewide toolused to aid in Base planning projects. Swansong will be connected to a graphics printer, allowing maps to begenerated for field use.

* ~~The GIS is the heart of the computer system. The GIS can provide a map of the entire Base that can beupdated as the Base expands and develops. The individual components or objects of the map are linked to adatabase in which items can be defined. The information in the database is entered according to a format.The development of an appropriate format is done in the planning stages. Queries can be run on thedatabase to allow the user to get certain requested information from the database compiled and theirrespective locations on the Base map highlighted. A comprehensive numbering system, which keeps track ofthe information in the GIS, can be made to be accessible by a networked PC, with the accessible portion ofthe database controlled by the central computer. Maintenance and operations personnel should be able toaccess the required information quickly and easily.

The video and text archival systems interface the G15 database. The video archival system will allow the userto display pictures and videos of an object on the monitor to visually enhance the data. The text archivalsystem will allow the user access to scan or computer generate all documents in the computer associated withselected objects. The data visualization modules will allow the user to plot selected views of the GISenvironmental data.

32

Project Description Fiscal Year cost

Remedial Soil, WWVTP IRA 92 $2.50OM

Basewide RI/ES - 0U2, 3, 4, 5 RI/FS 92 $3.60 M

Record of Decision - OUt1, 2, 3,4, 6 ROD 92 $1.20M

Design OUI GW Protection IRA ROD 92 $0.40 M

Joint Technology Demo with EPA FS 92 $0.30 M

Design 0U6 GW Protection IRA ROD 92 $0.05 M

Technology Demonstrations FS 92 $l.OOM

Management and Training 92 $0.40 M

Sitewide Management Plan 93 $o.ol M

Sitewide Sampling & Analysis 93 $1.90M

Civilian Manpower 93 $0.75 M

TDY & Tvl for IRP Support 93 $0.08 M

SER Limited Sampling 93 $0.45 M

OUI R1/FS 93 $0.60 M

OUIB Removals 93 $4.09 M

0U2 ROD 93 $0.30 M

0U3 ROD 93 S0.1SM

OU4 ROD 93 $0.31 M

OU5 ROD 93 $0.25 M

OU6B RI/FS 93 SO.30 M

Vacuum Extraction at ST48 93 SO.SO M

ST13/DP26 Remedial Action 93 $0.98 M

ST1O/SSl4 Remedial Action 93 SO.98 M

Contaminated Soil Re-use 93 $1.28 M

SER Removal 93 $2.44M

Purchase Industrial Dryer 93 $2.76 M

Joint Tech Demo with EPA 93 $0.25 M

Update Sitewide Management Plan 94 $O.O1 M

Sitewide Sampling 94 $t.OOM

Civilian Manpower 94 $0.78 M

TDY/TNG/FFA Support 94 $0. lO M

OU1 Proposed Plan & ROD 94 $0.40 M

OU1B Removals 94 $l.OOM

Table A-]Fundfing Requirements by risca Year for DERA -Eligi bit Activities

33

Project Description lFiscall Year cost

GUI Joint Tech Demo with EPA 94 $0.25 M

0U2 Remove Hydrocarbons 94 $4.00OM

0U3 Proposed Plan & ROD 94 $O.15 M

0U3 Remedial Action 94 $2.40 M

0U4 Proposed Plan & ROD 94 $o.iSM

0U4 Remedial Action 94 $4.60 M

GUS Proposed Plan & ROD 94 S0.iSM

GUS Remedial Action 94 SOSO0M0U6 Proposed. Plan & ROD 94 $0.30 M

0U6 Remedial Action 94 $2.OOM

SER Removal Actions 94 $6.50OM

Sitewide Sampling 95 SO.SO MUpdate Sitewide Management Plan 95 $O.O1 M

Civilian Manpower 95 $O.SO M

TDY/TNGIFFA Support 95 SO.IOM

OUI Remedial Design/Action 95 $1.60 M

0U2 Remedial Action 95 $1.SOM

GUS Remedial Action 95 $5.OO M

0U4 Remedial Action 95 $8.OO M

GUS Remedial Action 95 $5.OOM

0U6 Remedial Action 95 $2.70 M

SER Removal Actions 95 $7.OOM

Table A-]Funding Requirements by Fiscal Year for DERA -Eligible Activities (Concluded)

34

Project Description Fiscal Year cost

UST Program

* Fuel System Leak Detection Project 92 $1.93 M

* UST SmpllAssmt/Chrtztion 92 $0.14 M

* Fuel System Repair Priorization 92 $0.07 NI

E -2 Tank Testing 92 $0.05 NI

* UST Removal/Soil Remediation Equipment 92 $0.17 NI

Hazardous Materials/Waste Management

* Hazardous Waste Disposal 92 $0.24 NI

* Haz Material/Haz Waste Analysis 92 $0.25 NI

* Haz Material/Haz Waste Equipment 92 $0.04 M

* Oil/Water Separator Contract 92 $0.03 NI

* HMIHW Facilities 92 $0.90 M

Asbestos Sampling/Removal

* Asbestos Sampling 92 $0.Ol M

Permitting/Water Sampling

* NEPA Support 92 $0.O1 M

* Wetland Compliance 92 $0.01 NI

* Sampling Equipment 92 $0.02 MI

* Drinkting Water Sampling 92 $0.O1 M

* Ash Disposal/Wetland Compliance 92 $0.04 NI

* Mullin Pit 404 Compliance 92 $0.OI M

Projects and Service Contracts

* SPRP Plan 92 $0.06 NI

* Refuse Handling/Disposal Study 92 $0.10 M

Table A-2Funding Requirements by Fiscal Year for Compliance Program

35

Project Description Fiscal Year cost

US? Program

* Upgrade UST's 93 $2.20 M

* Improve Hydrant Fuel System 0-ft 93 $11.80M

* US? Smpl/AssmtiChrtztion 93 $O.OI M

* Fuel System Repair Priorization 93 $1.SOM

* A-B Design E-2 93 $0.40 M

* US? Removal/Soil Remtediation Equipment 93 $0.04 M

Hazardous Materials/Waste Management

* Hazardous Waste Disposal 93 $0.42 M

* Haz Material/Haz Waste Analysis 93 $0.12 M

* Spill Equipment 93 $0.06 M

* Haz Materiallflaz Waste Equipment 93 $0.03 M

* Oil/Water Separator Contract 93 $0.06 M

* Upgrade Oil/Water Separators 93 $0.09 M

Asbestos Sampling/Removal

* Asbestos Sampling/Equipment 93 $0.05 M

Permitting/Water Sampling

* NEPA Support 93 $0.15 M

* Emission Permit CH&PP 93 $0.06 M

* Wetland Compliance 93 $0.03 M

* Sampling Equipment 93 $0.02 M

* Drinking Water Sampling 93 $O.Ol M

* Non-Pt Monitoring 93 $0.02 M

* Waste Water Survey/Monitoring 93 $0.53 M

* Ash Disposal/Wetland Compliance 93 $0.04 M

* Mullin Pit 404 Compliance 93 $O.O1 M

Projects and Service Contracts

* Facility Site Survey 93 $0.21 M

* Inv Water Sys Cnst Mat 93 $0. 11 M

* Soil Landfarming 93 $O.OSM

* Dredge Effluent Pond 93 $0.02 M

* Pollution Prevention Plan 93 $0.45 M

Table A-2Funding Requirements by Thced Year for Compliance Program (Continued)

36

0 ~~~~~~~~~Project Description Fiscal Year cost

UST Program

* Fireman Training Facility 94 $2.20 M

* Upgrade UST's 94 $1.soM

* UST SmpllAssmtlChrtztion 94 $0.11 M

* A-B Design E-2 94 $0.04 M

* UST Removal/Soil Rernediation Equipment 94 $0.04 M

Hazardous Materials/Waste Management

* Hazardous Waste Disposal 94 $0.40 M

* Haz Matcrial/Haz Waste Analysis 94 $0.1 NII

* Spill Equipment 94 $0.O1 M

* Haz MaterialllHaz Waste Equipment 94 $0.01 NI

* Oil/Water Separator Contract 94 $0.06 M

* Upgrade OilfWater Separators 94 $0.09 M

Asbestos Samplinglftemoval

* Asbestos Sampling 94 $0.04 NI

Permitting/Water Sampling

* NEPA Support 9 01

* Wetland Compliance 94 $0.03 M

* Sampling Equipment 94 $0.02 MI

* Drinking Water Sampling 94 $0.O1 M

* Non-Pt Monitoring 94 $0.02 MI

* Ash Disposal/Wetland Compliance 94 $0.02 MI

* Mullin Pit 404 Compliance 94 $0.O1 M

Projects and Service Contracts

* Facility Site Survey 94 $0.20 M

* Soil Landfarming 94 $0.06 NI

Table A-2Fundfing Requirements by Fiscal Year for Compliance Program (Conlinued)

37

Project Description Fiscal Year Cost

UST Program

* Repair Hydrant Fueling A-H 95 $12.0OM

* UST Smpl/Assmt/Chrtztion 95 $O.11 M

* A-E Design E-6 95 $0.20 M

* UST Removal/Soil Remnediation Equipment 95 $0.04 M

Hazardous MaterialsfWaste Management

* Hazardous Waste Disposal 95 $0.38 M

* Haz Material/Haz Waste Analysis 95 $0. 11 M

* Spill Equipment 95 $0.o1 M

* Haz Material/Haz Waste Equipment 95 $0.01 M

* Oil/Water Separator Contract 95 $0.06 M

* Upgrade Oil/Water Separators 95 $0.09M

Asbestos Sampling/Removal

* Asbestos Sampling 95 $0.04 M

Permitting/Water Sampling

* NEPA Support 95 S0. 16 M

* Wetland Compliance 95 $0.03 M0

* Sampling Equipment 95 $O.O1 M

* Drinking Water Sampling 95 S0.O1 M

* Non-Nt Monitoring 95 $0.02 M

* Ash Disposal/Wetland Compliance 95 $0.01 M

* Mumli Pit 404 Compliance 95 $0.O1 M

Projects and Service Contracts

* Facility Site Survey 95 $0. 14 M

* Soil Landfanning 95 $0.06 M

Table A-2Fundiing Requirements by Fiscal Year for Compliance Program(Concluded)

38

* ~~~~~List of Acronyms

AAC Alaska Administrative Code

ACLs Alternate concentration limits

ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation

AFB Air Force Base

ANSC Areas of no suspected contamination

AOCs Areas of concern

ARARs Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements

BCRA Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1988 and Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act

of 1990, collectively

MAP Management Action Plan

CERCIA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended

* ~~CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CH&PP Central Heating and Power Plant

CRP Community Relations Plan

DERA Defense Environmental Restoration Account

DERP Defense Environmental Restoration Program

DoD Department of Defense

DQM Data Quality Management

EC Environmental Compliance

ElMP Environmental Impact Analysis Process

ENS Environmental Impact Statement

EOD Explosive Ordnance Demolition

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

EPC Environmental Protection Committee

ESC Environmental Steering Committee

39

FFA Federal Facility Agreement

FS Feasibility Study

FY Fiscal Year

GIS Geographic Information System

HM/HW Hazardous Material/Hazardous Waste

IRA Interim Remedial Action

IRP Installation Restoration Program

IRPIMS Installation Restoration Program Information Management System

JP-4 Jet Fuel

MILCON Military Construction

MOGAS Motor Gasoline

MSL Mean Sea Level

NCP National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan

NEPA National Environmental Policy Adt, as amended

NFA No Further Action

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

NPL National Priorities List

PA/SI Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

POIS Points of Interest

POL Petroleum, Oil, Lubricants

PP Proposed Plan

PPP Pollution Prevention Program

QA/OC Quality Assurance/Quality Control

RA Remedial Action

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended

RD Remedial Design

40

. ~~RDBMS Relational Database Management System

RI Remedial Investigation

RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

ROD Record of Decision

RPM Remedial Project Manager

SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

SER Source Evaluation Report

Si Site Investigation

TAG Technical Assistance Grant

TPM Technical Project/Program Manager

TRC Technical Review Committee

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended

UST Underground Storage Tank

41