makromolekulak_2010_12_07 simon istván. prion protein
TRANSCRIPT
-
Makromolekulak_2010_12_07
Simon Istvn
-
Prion protein
-
Bound IUP structuresp27Kip1IA3FnBPTcf3
-
Aminosav sszettelekRadivojac et al. Protein Sci. 2004;13:71-80. Rvid, hossz, N- s C- terminlis rgikban lv rszeknekms-ms aminosav sszettelk van
-
Dunker order promoting: W, C, F, I, Y, V, L, Ndisorder promoting: K, E, P, S, Q, G, R, G, A2. Uversky High net charge/ low average hydrophobicityMachine learning algorithms (SVM, NN)
Datasets PDB for ordered short and long disorderPrediction of protein disorder from the amino acid sequence
-
Pairwise energy calculated from structure
-
To take into account that the contribution of amino acid i depends on its interaction partners, we need a quadratic form in the amino acid compositionThe connection between composition and energy is encoded by the 20x20 energy predictor matrix: PijEstimation of pairwise energies from amino acid compositions
-
Estimated energies correlate with calculated energiesCorr coeff: 0.74
-
Estimated pairwise energies of globular proteins and IUPsIUPsGlob
-
IUPred: http://iupred.enzim.hu
-
IUPred: http://iupred.enzim.huP53 Tumor antigen
-
IUPs: high frequency in proteomescoliyeast
-
Erds-RnyiThe yeast interactomeBarabsi-AlbertNetworks
-
The mediator complex
-
Hub proteins contain more disordered regions in all four genomes
-
Distinct interfaces of disordered proteins More hydrophobic More residue-residue contacts Less segments
-
Lack of segmentation of the interfaces of IUPsIUPsGlob
-
LM average disorder profileslocal drop in disorder
-
Predicting protein disorder - IUPredBasic idea:If a residue is surrounded by other residues such that they cannot form enough favorable contacts, it will not adopt a well defined structureit will be disordered..QSDPSVEPPLSQETFSDLWKLLPENNVLSPLPSQAMDDLMLSPDDIEQWFTEDPGPDEAPRMPEAAPRVAPAPAAPTPAAPAPA..The algorithm:
-
Predicting protein disorder - IUPredBack to p53:The predicted interaction energy:E = 1.16*0.10+(-0.82)*0+=1.138
-
Predicting binding sites - ANCHOR3 Interaction with globular proteinsWe consider the average amino acid composition of a globular dataset instead of the own environment:
A 10%C 0%D 12 %E 10 %F 2 % stbA 7.67%C 2.43%D 4.92 %E 5.43 %F 3.19 % stbComposition calculated on a large globular datasetThe thus gained energy:where
-
Predicting binding sites - ANCHORExample: N terminal p53Contains three binding sites:MDM2: 17-27RPA70N: 33-56RNAPII: 45-58The three quantities are combined optimally to best distinguish binding sites.This is converted into a p-value (probability of the residue forming a disordered binding site).P = p1*Saverage + p2*Eint + p3*Egain
-
Application: Segmented bindingExample: human p27
Inhibitor of CDK2-CyclinA complex.3 domains become ordered during binding:
D1 binds strongly LH forms a helix, binds weakly and steers the third domain to place D2 binds strongly but not evenly contains 3 subdomains that give the majority of binding energy
We are able to identify strongly interacting regions separately
-
Rendezetlensg predikci - IUPred
-
Ismeretlen szekvencia predikcik
-
Ismeretlen szekvencia predikcikANCHORPSIPRED
-
Ismeretlen szekvencia predikcikA modellnk:DNS kt, globulris domnrendezetlenrszekkthely, rszbena-helikliskthely, a-helikliskthely, nincsszerkezeti infoA valsg (p53):DNS kt, globulris domnMDM2 kthelyRPA70N s RNAPIIkthely (tfedek)regulcis kthely, 4 partner(klnbz konformcik)tetramerizcis rgi,a-heliklis