making an impact - ferris state university · making an impact in michigan ... saundra lynch betty...

32
MAKING AN IM P A C T IN MICHIGAN CHARTER SCHOOLS ANNUAL REPORT 2013 FERRIS STATE Charter Schools Office UNIVERSITY

Upload: lamdan

Post on 18-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MAKING AN

IMPACTIN MICHIGANCHARTER SCHOOLS

ANNUAL REPORT 2013

FERRIS STATE

Charter Schools OfficeUNIVERSITY

4

5

6

7

8

10

11

Welcome

Our Team

Academy Board of Directors

Highlights & Accomplishments

By the Numbers

MEAP Results

Ferris Charter School Locations

TABLE OF CONTENTS

12 Academy Profiles

4 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Each of us at the Ferris State University Charter Schools Office (CSO) is pleased to present the 2012-13 Annual Report. Our goal in this document is to provide a broad overview of the FSU-authorized public school academies, and to give the reader a sense of the scope and reach of the University in the Pre-K-12 charter school arena.

While some basic performance data is included in this report, it was not practical nor our intent to include all data for each academy. Readers who wish to gather more information in this area are directed to the CSO website: ferris.edu/charterschools. It is there that one can find a wealth of performance data on each academy.

The CSO strives to provide the highest quality of oversight and accountability to the academies authorized by Ferris State University, and we take the daily education of nearly 10,000 students as a solemn responsibility as an authorizer. Our Mission speaks of “Continuous Quality Improvement” and it is the expectation of each of our academies, and equally important, the expectations of our office as well. Thank you for taking the time to get to know more about the FSU-authorized academies and the extraordinary work being accomplished by caring and skilled educators throughout our State.

Ronald S. Rizzo, Ph.D. Interim Director

FROM THE DIRECTOR:

Gary Granger, Chair

Alisha M. Baker

Paul E. Boyer

Erin R. Brown

Lori A. Gwizdala

D. William Lakin, OD

Arthur L. Tebo

Sueann L. Walz

BOARD OF TRUSTEES:

Dr. David L. EislerPresident, Ferris State University

Dr. Fritz Erickson

Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 5

OUR TEAM

Ferris State University will be recognized as an exemplary authorizer of Public School Academies.

This will be evidenced by the performance of our Public School Academies as follows:

Meeting or exceeding State requirements, including AYP

Meeting or exceeding

the standard of the Growth to Standard

student achievement

rubric

Meeting or exceeding an

overall Meeting Standards score on the Charter Schools Office

rubrics

Achieving 100% compliance on

all reporting requirements

(AOIS)

Meeting all contractual obligations

and the requirements of

law

The Ferris State University Charter Schools Office recommends authorization of Public School Academies and provides oversight focused on continuous quality improvement.

OUR VISION

OUR MISSION

Top from left: Don Haist, Jim Scholten, Susan Lewis, John Hackett, Lee Robinson, Art Willick Bottom from left: Linda Hayes, Mindy Britton, Phyllis Robinson, Ron Rizzo

6 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

ACADEMY BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2012-2013

Allen AcademyJames R. Blanks, PresidentFr. Ronald DeHondtKaren FranklinDavid GlowackiLillis JamesIvan JohnsonMuriel Pryor-Murphy

Benton Harbor Charter SchoolN. Jean Nesbitt, PresidentGlenda BellWalter BrownSaundra LynchBetty MasonWillie MitchellRobert Snyder

Bridge AcademyNajma Jamaludeen, PresidentToyab Al-BariJamal AljahmiFahmi HusainGhassan ShihabAhmad Tousis

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)Gale LaRoche, PresidentPatricia ClaramuntKatherine CrossleyMarvel DavisJeanne MartensSr. Janice RushmanLisa Sasaki

Conner Creek Academy EastAmanda Allen, PresidentDavid ChegashFrank DoriaTodd HouseworthDarnicia SimleyGregory WhiteCaroline Wolfrom

Creative Technologies AcademyJeremy Burgin, PresidentScott Edwards, PresidentKim de BruinStephen PhelpsLucas SmithJulie WheelerAndrew Willis

Francis Reh Public School AcademyJeannine Belton, PresidentSr. Maria BeckmanWillie F. CaseyStanley Krajkowski, PresidentCatherine KretzPenny LichonMarsha Wilson

George Crockett AcademyWilliam Smith, PresidentLisa Bey-KnightJoshua KeagleJessie Stegger

Hope Academy of West MichiganWilliam Haverkamp, PresidentBarth Roberts, PresidentLaurel ChristensenAlfonso ClarkLeslie CummingsDennis CusonWilliam Kirby

Hope of Detroit AcademyThomas Rys, PresidentJoe GappyErin IrwinDanielle JacksonRoslyn LovePatricia Ouellette

Huron AcademyJeffrey Duchene, PresidentKatherine ColomboColleen DickeySuzan KaradshehJames PernaRamzi Twal

Joy Preparatory AcademyPaul Neitman, PresidentLynese DavisKathleen GivensCharles NuttPatricia OwensGeorge Waters

Lighthouse Academy (SDA)Daniel VanderArk, PresidentWendy JohnsonBrenda KingGregory LambertGarry ReendersMarvin VanderVlietGordon VanHarn

Marshall AcademyJohn Swett, PresidentSteven AndersonPatti CornwellBrenda HowreyMary Louise KempinskiDavid Twiss

Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)Linda Frost, PresidentAndrew BellingarErvin BrinkerTodd TerryRandall Zylstra

New Bedford AcademyJennifer Cherry, PresidentCynthia DressJohn McNultyIvy NemethTimothy RothmanShanyn StewartKelly TuckerDean Vollmar

Northridge AcademyCharles Winfrey, PresidentAuthur EvansDiona McLaughlinCecilia Miller-SimsRose MurphySybil SharpJames ShelleyPatricia Watson

Pierre Toussaint AcademyDaryl Carson, PresidentEarleen McDanielDennis NordmoeMonique SharpeCurtis Smith

Voyageur AcademyJoseph Rush, PresidentCurtis Wade, PresidentDarryl BarnesMinika BenningJudith DonnellMattie EllisBarbara Smith

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 7

School Leadership Institute

New for the 2012-13 year, the CSO held three School Leadership Institutes (SLI) in 2012-13. Administrators, curriculum directors, assessment personnel and members of the academy school improvement teams were invited to attend the all-day workshops at no cost. Each highly interactive workshop centered on a particular educational theme or aspect of educational leadership. Presenters ranged from CSO staff to nationally known speakers and presenters.

Data Teams

Based on the model from the Leadership and Learning Center in Boulder, Colorado, schools were encouraged to form Data Teams. Workshops, webinars, and personal in-service academy presentations were given by certified CSO Data Team trainers as well as trainers from the Center. Data Teams focus on analyzing student performance data, and then formulating interventions for students who seem to be struggling with certain concepts and ideas.

Board Dinner and Development

In its ongoing series of development opportunities for academy Board members, the CSO held workshops and webinars for members of academy Boards. The Dinner and Development series allows for the exchange of ideas and rich conversation around topics of interest to academy governing boards, including student achievement, school finance, and differentiated authorizing.

HIGHLIGHTS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS

In an effort to help academies boost student performance, the CSO embarkedon an initiative to bring best practices and current educational thought to teachers and administrators at each FSU-authorized academy. Some new initiatives were initiated this year and existing practices were enhanced to help develop academy staff and members of the Board of Directors in their respective roles:

CSO Invests in PEOPLE

8 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

BY THE NUMBERS

19SCHOOLS

7OPERATORS

9,519TOTAL K-12 ENROLLMENT FOR 2012-2013

ACADEMY

Allen Academy 1,026

Benton Harbor Charter School 403

Bridge Academy 659

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 160

Conner Creek Academy East 1,126

Creative Technologies Academy 303

Francis Reh Public School Academy 415

George Crockett Academy 364

Hope Academy of West Michigan 403

Hope of Detroit Academy 575

Huron Academy 532

Joy Preparatory Academy 394

Lighthouse Academy (SDA) 290

Marshall Academy 243

Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber) 818

New Bedford Academy 159

Northridge Academy 268

Pierre Toussaint Academy 366

Voyageur Academy 1,015* UNAUDITED

ENROLLMENT

MANAGEMENTCOMPANY SCHOOLS

The Leona Group 8

Choice Schools 1

Global Educational Excellence 1

CS Partners 2

Integrity Educational Services 2

MJ Management Services, Inc. 2

Connections Academy 1

Self-Managed 1

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 9

7DEMOGRAPHICSEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdFREE/REDUCED

PRICE LUNCHSPECIAL EDUCATION

57% African-American

2% Asian 12% Hispanic 28% Caucasian

2% Other 0% Native American

80% Free/Reduced Price Lunch20% Non-Free/Reduced Price Lunch

12% Special Education Population88% General Education Population

FISCAL SUMMARY

AVERAGE

ACT S C O R E

16.6

BY THE NUMBERS

ACADEMY ACT SCORE

Allen Academy 15.0

Conner Creek Academy East 16.5

Creative Technologies Academy 18.7

Hope Academy of West Michigan 13.4

Hope Academy of Detroit *

Lighthouse Academy 15.1

Marshall Academy 17.9

Michigan Connections Academy 20.8

Voyageur Academy 15.2

*FERPA – 10 or less students is considered to contain student identifiable data and cannot be published.

ACADEMY

15.0

16.5

18.7

13.4

*

15.1

17.9

20.8

15.2

ACT SCORE

Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)

Allen Academy

Conner Creek Academy East

Creative Technologies Academy

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Hope of Detroit Academy

Lighthouse Academy (SDA)

Marshall Academy

Voyageur Academy

ACADEMY

Allen Academy $7,110

Benton Harbor Charter School 6,966

Bridge Academy 6,966

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 7,110

Conner Creek Academy East 7,110

Creative Technologies Academy 6,966

Francis Reh Public School Academy 7,094

George Crockett Academy 7,110

Hope Academy of West Michigan 7,026

Hope of Detroit Academy 7,110

Huron Academy 7,110

Joy Preparatory Academy 7,110

Lighthouse Academy (SDA) 7,089

Marshall Academy 6,966

Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber) 7,110

New Bedford Academy 6,966

Northridge Academy 7,110

Pierre Toussaint Academy 7,110

Voyageur Academy 7,110

FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE

10 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

BENTON HARBOR

Allen Academy

Benton HarborCharter School

Bridge Academy

Clara B. Ford Academy

Conner CreekAcademy East

Creative Technologies Academy

Francis Reh Public School Academy

George Crockett Academy

Hope Academyof West Michigan

Hope of Detroit Academy

Huron Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy

Lighthouse Academy

MarshallAcademy

New Bedford Academy

Northridge Academy

Pierre Toussaint Academy Voyageur Academy

GRAND RAPIDS

SAGINAW

LANSING

BIG RAPIDS

FLINT

DETROIT

METRODETROIT

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY

CHARTER SCHOOL LOCATIONS

MichiganConnectionsAcademy

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITYCharter Schools Office

MEAP RESULTS FALL 2012

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

READING MATH

ACADEMY PERCENTAGE

34.5%

9.6%

47.2%

20.3%

44.7%

29.1%

38.0%

12.5%

66.0%

44.0%

S36.4%

16.8%

46.8%

17.4%

21.0%

3.5%

44.5%

19.6%

67.7%

45.2%

37.7%

10.9%

23.1%

3.2%

67.3%

47.2%

69.5%

32.0%

70.7%

29.3%

44.7%

29.6%

28.8%

14.0%

34.3%

16.2%

*FERPA – 10 or less students is considered to contain student identifiable data and cannot be published.

Allen Academy

Benton Harbor Charter School

Bridge Academy

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Conner Creek Academy East

Creative Technologies Academy

Francis Reh Public School Academy

George Crockett Academy

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Hope of Detroit Academy

Huron Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy

Lighthouse Academy (SDA)

Voyageur Academy

Marshall Academy

Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)

New Bedford Academy

Northridge Academy

Pierre Toussaint Academy

NO DATA AVAILABLE

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 11

BENTON HARBOR

Allen Academy

Benton HarborCharter School

Bridge Academy

Clara B. Ford Academy

Conner CreekAcademy East

Creative Technologies Academy

Francis Reh Public School Academy

George Crockett Academy

Hope Academyof West Michigan

Hope of Detroit Academy

Huron Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy

Lighthouse Academy

MarshallAcademy

New Bedford Academy

Northridge Academy

Pierre Toussaint Academy Voyageur Academy

GRAND RAPIDS

SAGINAW

LANSING

BIG RAPIDS

FLINT

DETROIT

METRODETROIT

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY

CHARTER SCHOOL LOCATIONS

MichiganConnectionsAcademy

FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITYCharter Schools Office

12 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 13

ALLEN ACADEMY

Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-12

1998

2008-2015

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82955

Grades Served AddressK-12 8666 Quincy St.

Detroit, MI 48204

Charter Contract2008-2015

Management School LeaderMonique Woodland-Phillips

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Allen Academy

Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.

The Leona Group

87 100

91 86 87 78 98 78 90 67 61 69 33

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

673546

827897 942

1,035 1,060 1,0701,003 1,025

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82955

Grades Served AddressK-12 8666 Quincy St.

Detroit, MI 48204

Charter Contract2008-2015

Management School LeaderMonique Woodland-Phillips

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Allen Academy

Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.

The Leona Group

87 100

91 86 87 78 98 78 90 67 61 69 33

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

673546

827897 942

1,035 1,060 1,0701,003 1,025

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

8666 Quincy St.Detroit, MI 48204

SCHOOL LEADER: Monique Woodland-Phill ips

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 42.7% 33.8% 8.9% 40.2% 66.5%

Reading 4 35.7% 28.2% 7.5% 37.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 32.0% 48.5% -16.5% 43.0% 70.4%

Reading 6 44.2% 39.7% 4.5% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 23.3% 21.8% 1.5% 31.3% 62.0%

Reading 8 26.7% 35.6% -8.9% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 16.7% 17.1% -0.4% 30.1% 53.5%

Math 3 13.4% 3.8% 9.6% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 14.3% 3.8% 10.5% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 14.7% 8.1% 6.6% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 10.9% 9.5% 1.4% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 1.4% 3.4% -2.0% 12.2% 38.4%

Math 8 2.3% 6.9% -4.6% 9.7% 32.5%

Math 11 1.5% 5.7% -4.2% 6.1% 28.6%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

95% Free

0.9% Reduced

4.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Allen Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Allen Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2180

2426

2541

2607

2752

2818

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2112

2322

2456

2474

2554

2602

2594

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

30%

26%

2010-2011

70% Students Did Not Meet Target

30% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

17%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

Allen Academy

African-American 100%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 0%

Caucasian 0%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Allen Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 1,026 100.0%

Total Number of Districts: 1

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 42.7% 33.8% 8.9% 40.2% 66.5%

Reading 4 35.7% 28.2% 7.5% 37.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 32.0% 48.5% -16.5% 43.0% 70.4%

Reading 6 44.2% 39.7% 4.5% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 23.3% 21.8% 1.5% 31.3% 62.0%

Reading 8 26.7% 35.6% -8.9% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 16.7% 17.1% -0.4% 30.1% 53.5%

Math 3 13.4% 3.8% 9.6% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 14.3% 3.8% 10.5% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 14.7% 8.1% 6.6% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 10.9% 9.5% 1.4% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 1.4% 3.4% -2.0% 12.2% 38.4%

Math 8 2.3% 6.9% -4.6% 9.7% 32.5%

Math 11 1.5% 5.7% -4.2% 6.1% 28.6%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

95% Free

0.9% Reduced

4.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Allen Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Allen Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2180

2426

2541

2607

2752

2818

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2112

2322

2456

2474

2554

2602

2594

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

30%

26%

2010-2011

70% Students Did Not Meet Target

30% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

17%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Allen Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2180

2426

2541

2607

2752

2818

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2112

2322

2456

2474

2554

2602

2594

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

30%

26%

2010-2011

70% Students Did Not Meet Target

30% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

17%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Allen Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2180

2426

2541

2607

2752

2818

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2112

2322

2456

2474

2554

2602

2594

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

30%

26%

2010-2011

70% Students Did Not Meet Target

30% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

17%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Allen Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2180

2426

2541

2607

2752

2818

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2112

2322

2456

2474

2554

2602

2594

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

30%

26%

2010-2011

70% Students Did Not Meet Target

30% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

17%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM

MATH2012-2013

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

15TARGET = 21

14 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Benton HarborCharter School

Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Choice Schools

PK-8

1999

2009-2014

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-11903

Grades Served AddressPK-8 455 Riverview Drive

Benton Harbor, MI 49022

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderTim Harris

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Benton Harbor Charter School

Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.

Choice Schools

82 62 61 51 37 37 28 25 16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

487 468432 413

451483

396442

405 399

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-11903

Grades Served AddressPK-8 455 Riverview Drive

Benton Harbor, MI 49022

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderTim Harris

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Benton Harbor Charter School

Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.

Choice Schools

82 62 61 51 37 37 28 25 16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

487 468432 413

451483

396442

405 399

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

455 Riverview DriveBenton Harbor, MI 49022

SCHOOL LEADER: Tim Harris

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 38.3% 30.4% 7.9% 35.0% 66.5%

Reading 4 37.1% 36.1% 1.0% 31.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 51.5% 42.9% 8.6% 27.9% 70.4%

Reading 6 68.0% 36.1% 31.9% 27.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 39.1% 36.0% 3.1% 18.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 66.7% 37.9% 28.8% 27.1% 65.7%

Math 3 19.1% 15.2% 3.9% 11.8% 40.9%

Math 4 17.1% 5.6% 11.5% 8.8% 44.9%

Math 5 15.6% 19.0% -3.4% 7.0% 45.7%

Math 6 48.0% 11.1% 36.9% 7.9% 40.2%

Math 7 13.0% 25.0% -12.0% 4.3% 38.4%

Math 8 6.7% 17.2% -10.5% 2.5% 32.5%

2.8% Special Education

97.2% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Benton Harbor Charter School

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Benton Harbor Charter School 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Benton Harbor Area Schools 436 100.0%

Total Number of Districts: 1

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 38.3% 30.4% 7.9% 35.0% 66.5%

Reading 4 37.1% 36.1% 1.0% 31.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 51.5% 42.9% 8.6% 27.9% 70.4%

Reading 6 68.0% 36.1% 31.9% 27.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 39.1% 36.0% 3.1% 18.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 66.7% 37.9% 28.8% 27.1% 65.7%

Math 3 19.1% 15.2% 3.9% 11.8% 40.9%

Math 4 17.1% 5.6% 11.5% 8.8% 44.9%

Math 5 15.6% 19.0% -3.4% 7.0% 45.7%

Math 6 48.0% 11.1% 36.9% 7.9% 40.2%

Math 7 13.0% 25.0% -12.0% 4.3% 38.4%

Math 8 6.7% 17.2% -10.5% 2.5% 32.5%

2.8% Special Education

97.2% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Benton Harbor Charter School

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Benton Harbor Charter School

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2184

2400

2517

2664

2780

2886

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2187

2326

2402

2444

2700

2767

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

34%

26%

2010-2011

66% Students Did Not Meet Target

34% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

35%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Benton Harbor Charter School

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2184

2400

2517

2664

2780

2886

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2187

2326

2402

2444

2700

2767

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

34%

26%

2010-2011

66% Students Did Not Meet Target

34% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

35%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Benton Harbor Charter School

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2184

2400

2517

2664

2780

2886

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2187

2326

2402

2444

2700

2767

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

34%

26%

2010-2011

66% Students Did Not Meet Target

34% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

35%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Benton Harbor Charter School

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2184

2400

2517

2664

2780

2886

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2187

2326

2402

2444

2700

2767

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

34%

26%

2010-2011

66% Students Did Not Meet Target

34% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

18%

35%

2010-2011

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2011-2012

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Benton Harbor Charter School

African-American 93%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 5%

Caucasian 1%

Native American 0%

Other 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 15

To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Global Education Excellence

K-8

2011

2009-2014

Year Opened District Code2011??? 2012-2013_MI-82983

Grades Served AddressK-8 9600 Buffalo St.

Hamtramck, MI 48212

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderKhalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Bridge Academy

To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.

Global Education Excellence

62 74 78 78 76 65 64 74 88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

309 330 350

528565 586 586

737659

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2011??? 2012-2013_MI-82983

Grades Served AddressK-8 9600 Buffalo St.

Hamtramck, MI 48212

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderKhalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Bridge Academy

To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.

Global Education Excellence

62 74 78 78 76 65 64 74 88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

309 330 350

528565 586 586

737659

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Bridge AcademyBridge Academy - East (PreK-5)

9600 Buffalo St, Hamtramck, MI 49212

Bridge Academy - West (6-8)3105 Carpenter Rd. Detroit, MI 48212

SCHOOL LEADERS: Khalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 50.0% 30.6% 19.4% 46.4% 66.5%

Reading 4 45.9% 41.5% 4.4% 41.6% 68.1%

Reading 5 38.6% 30.6% 8.0% 42.9% 70.4%

Reading 6 45.3% 26.8% 18.5% 49.9% 68.2%

Reading 7 29.2% 31.4% -2.2% 40.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 56.1% 32.4% 23.7% 47.6% 65.7%

Math 3 36.4% 24.3% 12.1% 21.4% 40.9%

Math 4 41.3% 29.9% 11.4% 31.2% 44.9%

Math 5 28.3% 24.6% 3.7% 30.9% 45.7%

Math 6 27.4% 25.6% 1.8% 31.3% 40.2%

Math 7 24.7% 17.1% 7.6% 31.0% 38.4%

Math 8 17.4% 10.6% 6.8% 22.2% 32.5%

4.9% Special Education

95.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

55.7% ELL Student Pop.

44.3% General Education

Bridge Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Bridge Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Hamtramck, School District of the City of 472 71.6%Detroit City School District 177 26.9%Dearborn City School District 5 0.8%Hancock Public Schools 2 0.3%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.3%Warren Consolidated Schools 1 0.2%

Total Number of Districts: 6

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 50.0% 30.6% 19.4% 46.4% 66.5%

Reading 4 45.9% 41.5% 4.4% 41.6% 68.1%

Reading 5 38.6% 30.6% 8.0% 42.9% 70.4%

Reading 6 45.3% 26.8% 18.5% 49.9% 68.2%

Reading 7 29.2% 31.4% -2.2% 40.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 56.1% 32.4% 23.7% 47.6% 65.7%

Math 3 36.4% 24.3% 12.1% 21.4% 40.9%

Math 4 41.3% 29.9% 11.4% 31.2% 44.9%

Math 5 28.3% 24.6% 3.7% 30.9% 45.7%

Math 6 27.4% 25.6% 1.8% 31.3% 40.2%

Math 7 24.7% 17.1% 7.6% 31.0% 38.4%

Math 8 17.4% 10.6% 6.8% 22.2% 32.5%

4.9% Special Education

95.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

55.7% ELL Student Pop.

44.3% General Education

Bridge Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Bridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2253

2407

2615

2641

2697

2764

2905

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2213

2380

2493

2522

2654

2780

2859

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

35%

36%

2010-2011

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2011-2012

64% Students Did Not Meet Target

36% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

46%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

54% Students Did Not Meet Target

46% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Bridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2253

2407

2615

2641

2697

2764

2905

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2213

2380

2493

2522

2654

2780

2859

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

35%

36%

2010-2011

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2011-2012

64% Students Did Not Meet Target

36% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

46%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

54% Students Did Not Meet Target

46% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Bridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2253

2407

2615

2641

2697

2764

2905

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2213

2380

2493

2522

2654

2780

2859

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

35%

36%

2010-2011

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2011-2012

64% Students Did Not Meet Target

36% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

46%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

54% Students Did Not Meet Target

46% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Bridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2253

2407

2615

2641

2697

2764

2905

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2213

2380

2493

2522

2654

2780

2859

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

35%

36%

2010-2011

65% Students Did Not Meet Target

35% Students Met Target

2011-2012

64% Students Did Not Meet Target

36% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

46%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

54% Students Did Not Meet Target

46% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Bridge Academy

African-American 1%

Asian 21%

Hispanic 1%

Caucasian 77%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

16 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Clara B. Ford Academy(SDA)

The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

CS Partners

K-12

2007

2012-2017

Year Opened District Code2007 2012-2013_MI-82996

Grades Served AddressK-12 20651 W. Warren Ave.

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127

Charter Contract2012-2017

Management PrincipalBeverly Baroni

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.

CS Partners

2 10 9 31 56 33 17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

180177

184

166 166

158

145150

155

160

165170

175

180

185190

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2007 2012-2013_MI-82996

Grades Served AddressK-12 20651 W. Warren Ave.

Dearborn Heights, MI 48127

Charter Contract2012-2017

Management PrincipalBeverly Baroni

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.

CS Partners

2 10 9 31 56 33 17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

180177

184

166 166

158

145150

155

160

165170

175

180

185190

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

20651 W. Warren Ave.Dearborn Heights, MI 48127

SCHOOL LEADER: Beverly Baroni

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 6 %2.86**

Reading 7 %0.26**

Reading 8 %7.56**

Reading 11 13.3% 18.2% -4.9% 53.5%

Math 6 %2.04**

Math 7 %4.83**

Math 8 %5.23**

Math 11 %6.82*%0.0

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

NO DATA AVAILABLE

NO DATA AVAILABLE

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Total Number of Districts: 0

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 6 %2.86**

Reading 7 %0.26**

Reading 8 %7.56**

Reading 11 13.3% 18.2% -4.9% 53.5%

Math 6 %2.04**

Math 7 %4.83**

Math 8 %5.23**

Math 11 %6.82*%0.0

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

100% Free

0% Reduced

0% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

NO DATA AVAILABLE

NO DATA AVAILABLEProof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

Reading

GRADE

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

Reading

GRADE

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

Reading

GRADE

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

NA

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Clara B. Ford Academy

African-American 65%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 6%

Caucasian 24%

Native American 1%

Other 4%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

* FERPA

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 17

• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

CS Partners

K-12

1999

2013-2015

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50902

Grades Served AddressK-12 19611 Eastland

Roseville, MI 48066

Charter Contract2013-2015

Management SuperintendentChuck Meredith

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Conner Creek Academy East

• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.

CS Partners

55 76 66 59 75 75 79 88 87 112

123

101

126

1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Ung

689775 826 873 849 843

1,0321,120 1,124 1,123

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50902

Grades Served AddressK-12 19611 Eastland

Roseville, MI 48066

Charter Contract2013-2015

Management SuperintendentChuck Meredith

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Conner Creek Academy East

• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.

CS Partners

55 76 66 59 75 75 79 88 87 112

123

101

126

1

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Ung

689775 826 873 849 843

1,0321,120 1,124 1,123

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Conner Creek AcademyEast

Conner Creek Academy East (K-6)16911 Eastland, Roseville, MI 48066

Michigan Collegiate High School and Middle School (7-12)31300 Ryan Rd., Warren, MI 48092

SCHOOL LEADER: Chuck Meredith

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 32.0% 23.5% 8.5% 44.8% 66.5%

Reading 4 41.0% 31.0% 10.0% 42.4% 68.1%

Reading 5 43.1% 47.3% -4.2% 47.1% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.3% 46.1% 1.2% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.7% 27.3% 7.4% 35.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 31.0% 30.9% 0.1% 45.9% 65.7%

Reading 11 26.7% 17.5% 9.2% 32.0% 53.5%

Math 3 14.0% 12.9% 1.1% 18.3% 40.9%

Math 4 18.0% 6.9% 11.1% 20.3% 44.9%

Math 5 15.4% 5.4% 10.0% 20.5% 45.7%

Math 6 10.8% 18.4% -7.6% 16.1% 40.2%

Math 7 18.9% 13.6% 5.3% 15.7% 38.4%

Math 8 1.2% 5.7% -4.5% 12.5% 32.5%

Math 11 1.2% 1.8% -0.6% 8.3% 28.6%

14.7% Special Education

85.3% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

84% Free

4.1% Reduced

11.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Conner Creek Academy East

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.

Conner Creek Academy East 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 779 69.0%Roseville Community Schools 73 6.5%East Detroit Public Schools 72 6.4%Warren Consolidated Schools 39 3.5%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 29 2.6%Warren Woods Public Schools 29 2.6%Clintondale Community Schools 16 1.4%Utica Community Schools 12 1.1%Hamtramck, School District of the City of 10 0.9%Highland Park City Schools 8 0.7%Madison District Public Schools 7 0.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 6 0.5%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 6 0.5%Southfield Public School District 5 0.4%Fraser Public Schools 4 0.4%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 4 0.4%Van Dyke Public Schools 4 0.4%Hazel Park, School District of the City of 3 0.3%Dearborn City School District 2 0.2%Other 21 1.9%

Total Number of Districts: 34

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 32.0% 23.5% 8.5% 44.8% 66.5%

Reading 4 41.0% 31.0% 10.0% 42.4% 68.1%

Reading 5 43.1% 47.3% -4.2% 47.1% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.3% 46.1% 1.2% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.7% 27.3% 7.4% 35.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 31.0% 30.9% 0.1% 45.9% 65.7%

Reading 11 26.7% 17.5% 9.2% 32.0% 53.5%

Math 3 14.0% 12.9% 1.1% 18.3% 40.9%

Math 4 18.0% 6.9% 11.1% 20.3% 44.9%

Math 5 15.4% 5.4% 10.0% 20.5% 45.7%

Math 6 10.8% 18.4% -7.6% 16.1% 40.2%

Math 7 18.9% 13.6% 5.3% 15.7% 38.4%

Math 8 1.2% 5.7% -4.5% 12.5% 32.5%

Math 11 1.2% 1.8% -0.6% 8.3% 28.6%

14.7% Special Education

85.3% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

84% Free

4.1% Reduced

11.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Conner Creek Academy East

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Conner Creek Academy East

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2152

2310

2454

2622

2830

2707

2821

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2119

2284

2371

2518

2546

2687

2718

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

27%

24%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

17%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

15

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Conner Creek Academy East

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2152

2310

2454

2622

2830

2707

2821

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2119

2284

2371

2518

2546

2687

2718

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

27%

24%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

17%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

15

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Conner Creek Academy East

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2152

2310

2454

2622

2830

2707

2821

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2119

2284

2371

2518

2546

2687

2718

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

27%

24%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

17%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

15

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Conner Creek Academy East

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2152

2310

2454

2622

2830

2707

2821

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2119

2284

2371

2518

2546

2687

2718

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

27%

24%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

17%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

15 MATH2012-2013

Conner Creek Academy East

African-American 95%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 1%

Caucasian 3%

Native American 0%

Other 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

16.5TARGET = 21

Conner Creek Academy East 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 779 69.0%Roseville Community Schools 73 6.5%East Detroit Public Schools 72 6.4%Warren Consolidated Schools 39 3.5%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 29 2.6%Warren Woods Public Schools 29 2.6%Clintondale Community Schools 16 1.4%Utica Community Schools 12 1.1%Hamtramck, School District of the City of 10 0.9%Highland Park City Schools 8 0.7%Madison District Public Schools 7 0.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 6 0.5%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 6 0.5%Southfield Public School District 5 0.4%Fraser Public Schools 4 0.4%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 4 0.4%Van Dyke Public Schools 4 0.4%Hazel Park, School District of the City of 3 0.3%Dearborn City School District 2 0.2%Other 21 1.9%

Total Number of Districts: 34

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM

18 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Creative TechnologiesAcademy

Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive enviroment that develops life-long learners.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Self-Managed

K-12

1998

2007-2014

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-41918

Grades Served AddressK-12 350 Pine Street

Cedar Springs, MI 49319

Charter Contract2007-2014

Management PrincipalDan George

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Creative Technologies Academy

Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive environment that develops life-long learners.

Self-Managed

18 15 21 20 20 12 18 19 24 26 38 31 39

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

229

276298 295

264289

310 302322

301

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-41918

Grades Served AddressK-12 350 Pine Street

Cedar Springs, MI 49319

Charter Contract2007-2014

Management PrincipalDan George

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Creative Technologies Academy

Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive environment that develops life-long learners.

Self-Managed

18 15 21 20 20 12 18 19 24 26 38 31 39

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

229

276298 295

264289

310 302322

301

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

350 Pine StreetCedar Springs, MI 49319

SCHOOL LEADER: Dan George

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 50.0% 55.0% -5.0% 66.4% 66.5%

Reading 4 77.8% 60.0% 17.8% 67.9% 68.1%

Reading 5 %4.07%5.57%9.16*

Reading 6 70.6% 62.5% 8.1% 74.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 63.2% 66.7% -3.5% 64.8% 62.0%

Reading 8 68.2% 64.3% 3.9% 67.1% 65.7%

Reading 11 41.4% 56.3% -14.9% 54.9% 53.5%

Math 3 29.4% 15.0% 14.4% 34.5% 40.9%

Math 4 61.1% 33.3% 27.8% 42.6% 44.9%

Math 5 %7.54%5.94%0.05*

Math 6 52.9% 37.5% 15.4% 35.2% 40.2%

Math 7 42.1% 22.7% 19.4% 35.4% 38.4%

Math 8 36.4% 21.4% 15.0% 25.2% 32.5%

Math 11 24.1% 21.9% 2.2% 23.8% 28.6%

15.5% Special Education

84.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

29.6% Free

0% Reduced

70.4% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Creative Technologies Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Creative Technologies Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Cedar Springs Public Schools 140 46.2%Tri County Area Schools 87 28.7%Sparta Area Schools 15 5.0%Kent City Community Schools 14 4.6%Lakeview Community Schools (Montcalm) 13 4.3%Rockford Public Schools 11 3.6%Greenville Public Schools 10 3.3%Grant Public School District 7 2.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 2 0.7%Forest Hills Public Schools 2 0.7%Newaygo Public School District 2 0.7%

Total Number of Districts: 11

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 50.0% 55.0% -5.0% 66.4% 66.5%

Reading 4 77.8% 60.0% 17.8% 67.9% 68.1%

Reading 5 %4.07%5.57%9.16*

Reading 6 70.6% 62.5% 8.1% 74.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 63.2% 66.7% -3.5% 64.8% 62.0%

Reading 8 68.2% 64.3% 3.9% 67.1% 65.7%

Reading 11 41.4% 56.3% -14.9% 54.9% 53.5%

Math 3 29.4% 15.0% 14.4% 34.5% 40.9%

Math 4 61.1% 33.3% 27.8% 42.6% 44.9%

Math 5 %7.54%5.94%0.05*

Math 6 52.9% 37.5% 15.4% 35.2% 40.2%

Math 7 42.1% 22.7% 19.4% 35.4% 38.4%

Math 8 36.4% 21.4% 15.0% 25.2% 32.5%

Math 11 24.1% 21.9% 2.2% 23.8% 28.6%

15.5% Special Education

84.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

29.6% Free

0% Reduced

70.4% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Creative Technologies Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Creative Technologies Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2222

2502

2702

2765

2905

3139

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2280

2483

2562

2638

2726

2884

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

56%

57%

2010-2011

44% Students Did Not Meet Target

56% Students Met Target

2011-2012

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

53%

55%

2010-2011

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2011-2012

45% Students Did Not Meet Target

55% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

18.7

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Creative Technologies Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2222

2502

2702

2765

2905

3139

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2280

2483

2562

2638

2726

2884

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

56%

57%

2010-2011

44% Students Did Not Meet Target

56% Students Met Target

2011-2012

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

53%

55%

2010-2011

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2011-2012

45% Students Did Not Meet Target

55% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

18.7

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Creative Technologies Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2222

2502

2702

2765

2905

3139

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2280

2483

2562

2638

2726

2884

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

56%

57%

2010-2011

44% Students Did Not Meet Target

56% Students Met Target

2011-2012

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

53%

55%

2010-2011

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2011-2012

45% Students Did Not Meet Target

55% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

18.7

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Creative Technologies Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2222

2502

2702

2765

2905

3139

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2280

2483

2562

2638

2726

2884

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

56%

57%

2010-2011

44% Students Did Not Meet Target

56% Students Met Target

2011-2012

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

53%

55%

2010-2011

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2011-2012

45% Students Did Not Meet Target

55% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

18.7 MATH2012-2013

Creative Technologies

African-American 0%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 1%

Caucasian 96%

Native American 0%

Other 3%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

18.7TARGET = 21

* FERPA

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 19

Francis RehPublic School Academy

Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Our high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

PK-8

1998

2011-2014

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-73909

Grades Served AddressPK-8 2201 Owen

Saginaw, MI 48601

Charter Contract2011-2014

Management School LeaderKate Scheid-Weber

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Francis Reh PSA

Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Ou high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.

The Leona Group

45 44 53 47 50 41 41 46 48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

275 292 306

250 256 250

343373 366

415

050

100

150

200250

300

350

400450

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-73909

Grades Served AddressPK-8 2201 Owen

Saginaw, MI 48601

Charter Contract2011-2014

Management School LeaderKate Scheid-Weber

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Francis Reh PSA

Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Ou high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.

The Leona Group

45 44 53 47 50 41 41 46 48

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

275 292 306

250 256 250

343373 366

415

050

100

150

200250

300

350

400450

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

2201 OwenSaginaw, MI 48601

SCHOOL LEADER: Kate Scheid-Weber

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Francis Reh PSA 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Saginaw, School District of the City of 415 100.0%

Total Number of Districts: 1

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Francis Reh PSA

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2097

2283

2438

2683

2622

2797

2869

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2031

2253

2352

2509

2523

2634

2660

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

17%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

20%

12%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

12% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Francis Reh PSA

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2097

2283

2438

2683

2622

2797

2869

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2031

2253

2352

2509

2523

2634

2660

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

17%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

20%

12%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

12% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Francis Reh PSA

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2097

2283

2438

2683

2622

2797

2869

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2031

2253

2352

2509

2523

2634

2660

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

17%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

20%

12%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

12% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Francis Reh PSA

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2097

2283

2438

2683

2622

2797

2869

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2031

2253

2352

2509

2523

2634

2660

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

17%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

20%

12%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

88% Students Did Not Meet Target

12% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%

Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%

Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%

Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%

Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%

Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%

Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%

15.2% Special Education

84.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92% Free

1.9% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Francis Reh PSA

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

MATH2012-2013

Francis Reh PSA

African-American 80%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 13%

Caucasian 1%

Native American 0%

Other 6%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

20 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

George Crockett Academy

George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-12

1998

2009-2014

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82937

Grades Served AddressK-12 4851 14th Street

Detroit, MI 48208

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderMary Lou Van Antwerp

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

George Crockett Academy

George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.

The Leona Group

39 46 35 40 31 38 42 28 31 17 8 4 6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

409 395 417 426 429 438 431 446420

365

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82937

Grades Served AddressK-12 4851 14th Street

Detroit, MI 48208

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderMary Lou Van Antwerp

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

George Crockett Academy

George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.

The Leona Group

39 46 35 40 31 38 42 28 31 17 8 4 6

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

409 395 417 426 429 438 431 446420

365

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

George Crockett Academy (K-8)4851 14th St., Detroit, MI 48208

Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210

SCHOOL LEADER: Mary Lou VanAntwerp

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 52.5% 43.9% 8.6% 40.2% 66.5%

Reading 4 46.7% 37.8% 8.9% 37.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 42.9% 48.8% -5.9% 43.0% 70.4%

Reading 6 52.4% 32.6% 19.8% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 32.1% 35.1% -3.0% 31.3% 62.0%

Reading 8 50.0% 41.5% 8.5% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**

Math 3 27.5% 9.8% 17.7% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 30.0% 8.1% 21.9% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 15.8% 7.0% 8.8% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 19.0% 4.3% 14.7% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 0.0% 12.8% -12.8% 12.2% 38.4%

Math 8 6.9% 9.8% -2.9% 9.7% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%1.6**

9% Special Education

91% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

97% Free

0.5% Reduced

2.5% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

George Crockett Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.George Crockett Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 365 100.0%

Total Number of Districts: 1

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 52.5% 43.9% 8.6% 40.2% 66.5%

Reading 4 46.7% 37.8% 8.9% 37.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 42.9% 48.8% -5.9% 43.0% 70.4%

Reading 6 52.4% 32.6% 19.8% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 32.1% 35.1% -3.0% 31.3% 62.0%

Reading 8 50.0% 41.5% 8.5% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**

Math 3 27.5% 9.8% 17.7% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 30.0% 8.1% 21.9% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 15.8% 7.0% 8.8% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 19.0% 4.3% 14.7% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 0.0% 12.8% -12.8% 12.2% 38.4%

Math 8 6.9% 9.8% -2.9% 9.7% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%1.6**

9% Special Education

91% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

97% Free

0.5% Reduced

2.5% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

George Crockett Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

George Crockett Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2098

2458

2473

2613

2805

2778

2856

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2083

2371

2412

2429

2635

2532

2719

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

26%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

26%

23%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

George Crockett Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2098

2458

2473

2613

2805

2778

2856

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2083

2371

2412

2429

2635

2532

2719

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

26%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

26%

23%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

George Crockett Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2098

2458

2473

2613

2805

2778

2856

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2083

2371

2412

2429

2635

2532

2719

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

26%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

26%

23%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

George Crockett Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2098

2458

2473

2613

2805

2778

2856

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2083

2371

2412

2429

2635

2532

2719

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

26%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

26%

23%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

George Crockett Academy

African-American 100%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 0%

Caucasian 0%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

* FERPA

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 21

Hope Academyof West Michigan

Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

K-12

2011

2011-2016

Year Opened District Code2011 2012-2013_MI-41926

Grades Served AddressK-12 240 Brown Street SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49507

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

15 25 38 26 17 14 37 39 27 40 51 45 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

295

432

050

100150200250300350400450500

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2011 2012-2013_MI-41926

Grades Served AddressK-12 240 Brown Street SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49507

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

15 25 38 26 17 14 37 39 27 40 51 45 58

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

295

432

050

100150200250300350400450500

11-1

2

12-1

3

240 Brown Street SEGrand Rapids, MI 49507

SCHOOL LEADER: Heidi Cate

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 47.0% 66.5%

Reading 4 %1.86%8.45*%7.62

Reading 5 35.7% 26.3% 9.4% 52.6% 70.4%

Reading 6 20.6% 21.7% -1.1% 53.5% 68.2%

Reading 7 12.1% 18.8% -6.7% 37.7% 62.0%

Reading 8 17.4% 25.0% -7.6% 47.3% 65.7%

Reading 11 5.9% 8.3% -2.4% 38.0% 53.5%

Math 3 4.5% 14.3% -9.8% 20.4% 40.9%

Math 4 %9.44%7.62*%3.31

Math 5 7.1% 0.0% 7.1% 25.9% 45.7%

Math 6 0.0% 13.0% -13.0% 25.4% 40.2%

Math 7 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 15.0% 38.4%

Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.1% 32.5%

Math 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 28.6%

11.7% Special Education

88.3% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

80.8% Free

3.5% Reduced

15.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

4.5% ELL Student Pop.

95.5% General Education

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Hope Academy of West Michigan 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Grand Rapids Public Schools 406 91.2%Kentwood Public Schools 19 4.3%Forest Hills Public Schools 8 1.8%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 5 1.1%Wyoming Public Schools 3 0.7%Comstock Park Public Schools 2 0.4%Grandville Public Schools 1 0.2%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 1 0.2%

Total Number of Districts: 8

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 47.0% 66.5%

Reading 4 %1.86%8.45*%7.62

Reading 5 35.7% 26.3% 9.4% 52.6% 70.4%

Reading 6 20.6% 21.7% -1.1% 53.5% 68.2%

Reading 7 12.1% 18.8% -6.7% 37.7% 62.0%

Reading 8 17.4% 25.0% -7.6% 47.3% 65.7%

Reading 11 5.9% 8.3% -2.4% 38.0% 53.5%

Math 3 4.5% 14.3% -9.8% 20.4% 40.9%

Math 4 %9.44%7.62*%3.31

Math 5 7.1% 0.0% 7.1% 25.9% 45.7%

Math 6 0.0% 13.0% -13.0% 25.4% 40.2%

Math 7 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 15.0% 38.4%

Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.1% 32.5%

Math 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 28.6%

11.7% Special Education

88.3% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

80.8% Free

3.5% Reduced

15.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

4.5% ELL Student Pop.

95.5% General Education

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2103

2726

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2131

2574

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

16%

2010-2011

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

19%

2010-2011

2011-2012

81% Students Did Not Meet Target

19% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2103

2726

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2131

2574

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

16%

2010-2011

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

19%

2010-2011

2011-2012

81% Students Did Not Meet Target

19% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2103

2726

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2131

2574

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

16%

2010-2011

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

19%

2010-2011

2011-2012

81% Students Did Not Meet Target

19% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope Academy of West Michigan

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2103

2726

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2131

2574

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

NA

16%

2010-2011

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

NA

19%

2010-2011

2011-2012

81% Students Did Not Meet Target

19% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Hope Academy of West Michigan

African-American 46%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 51%

Caucasian 3%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

13.4TARGET = 21

* FERPA

22 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Hope of DetroitAcademy

It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-12

1999

2009-2014

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82957

Grades Served AddressK-12 4443 N. Campbell Street

Detroit, MI 48210

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderAli Abdel

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Hope of Detroit Academy

It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.

The Leona Group

65 59 60 57 52 59 60 54 56 28 7 6 9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

446 449482 505 496 496 488 510 523

572

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82957

Grades Served AddressK-12 4443 N. Campbell Street

Detroit, MI 48210

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderAli Abdel

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Hope of Detroit Academy

It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.

The Leona Group

65 59 60 57 52 59 60 54 56 28 7 6 9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

446 449482 505 496 496 488 510 523

572

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Hope of Detroit Academy (K-8)4443 Campbell, Detroit, MI 48210

Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210

SCHOOL LEADER: Ali Abdel

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.5% 35.3% -0.8% 40.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 49.0% 51.9% -2.9% 38.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.5% 49.1% -14.6% 43.1% 70.4%

Reading 6 58.6% 44.6% 14.0% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 50.9% 37.5% 13.4% 31.6% 62.0%

Reading 8 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**

Math 3 21.8% 15.7% 6.1% 14.6% 40.9%

Math 4 17.6% 14.8% 2.8% 16.6% 44.9%

Math 5 27.6% 25.0% 2.6% 16.2% 45.7%

Math 6 23.7% 8.9% 14.8% 12.5% 40.2%

Math 7 20.4% 12.5% 7.9% 12.3% 38.4%

Math 8 5.5% 15.6% -10.1% 9.8% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%3.6**

12.4% Special Education

87.6% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.2% Free

4.2% Reduced

6.6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

75.8% ELL Student Pop.

24.2% General Education

Hope of Detroit Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Hope of Detroit Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 558 96.4%River Rouge, School District of the City of 6 1.0%Allen Park Public Schools 3 0.5%Dearborn Heights School District #7 3 0.5%East Detroit Public Schools 2 0.3%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.3%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 2 0.3%School District of the City of Inkster 1 0.2%Taylor School District 1 0.2%Waterford School District 1 0.2%

Total Number of Districts: 10

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.5% 35.3% -0.8% 40.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 49.0% 51.9% -2.9% 38.0% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.5% 49.1% -14.6% 43.1% 70.4%

Reading 6 58.6% 44.6% 14.0% 43.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 50.9% 37.5% 13.4% 31.6% 62.0%

Reading 8 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 43.2% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**

Math 3 21.8% 15.7% 6.1% 14.6% 40.9%

Math 4 17.6% 14.8% 2.8% 16.6% 44.9%

Math 5 27.6% 25.0% 2.6% 16.2% 45.7%

Math 6 23.7% 8.9% 14.8% 12.5% 40.2%

Math 7 20.4% 12.5% 7.9% 12.3% 38.4%

Math 8 5.5% 15.6% -10.1% 9.8% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%3.6**

12.4% Special Education

87.6% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.2% Free

4.2% Reduced

6.6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

75.8% ELL Student Pop.

24.2% General Education

Hope of Detroit Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope of Detroit Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2142

2247

2498

2620

2802

2816

2898

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2177

2214

2410

2444

2538

2598

2628

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

20%

24%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

16%

17%

2010-2011

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope of Detroit Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2142

2247

2498

2620

2802

2816

2898

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2177

2214

2410

2444

2538

2598

2628

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

20%

24%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

16%

17%

2010-2011

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope of Detroit Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2142

2247

2498

2620

2802

2816

2898

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2177

2214

2410

2444

2538

2598

2628

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

20%

24%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

16%

17%

2010-2011

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Hope of Detroit Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2142

2247

2498

2620

2802

2816

2898

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2177

2214

2410

2444

2538

2598

2628

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

20%

24%

2010-2011

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

16%

17%

2010-2011

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2011-2012

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Hope of Detroit Academy

African-American 15%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 82%

Caucasian 1%

Native American 0%

Other 2%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

*FERPA

TARGET = 21

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 23

Huron Academy

Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

CS Partners

K-6

1999

2011-2016

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50903

Grades Served AddressK-6 11401 Metro Parkway

Sterling Heights, MI 48312

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management School LeaderMark Talbot

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Huron Academy

Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.

CS Partners

85 76 95 93 76 47 60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th

486 479 458485

408 431 428

526 542 532

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50903

Grades Served AddressK-6 11401 Metro Parkway

Sterling Heights, MI 48312

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management School LeaderMark Talbot

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Huron Academy

Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.

CS Partners

85 76 95 93 76 47 60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th

486 479 458485

408 431 428

526 542 532

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

11401 Metro ParkwaySterling Heights, MI 48312

SCHOOL LEADER: Mark Talbot

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 64.3% 50.6% 13.7% 65.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 69.4% 67.9% 1.5% 65.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 57.4% 70.3% -12.9% 68.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 80.4% 69.4% 11.0% 66.0% 68.2%

Math 3 33.0% 23.4% 9.6% 40.1% 40.9%

Math 4 52.1% 46.2% 5.9% 43.1% 44.9%

Math 5 37.8% 41.9% -4.1% 44.5% 45.7%

Math 6 60.7% 16.3% 44.4% 39.2% 40.2%

10.9% Special Education

89.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

42.9% Free

6.8% Reduced

50.4% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

27.3% ELL Student Pop.

72.7% General Education

Huron Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Huron Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Utica Community Schools 179 33.6%Warren Consolidated Schools 179 33.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 41 7.7%Clintondale Community Schools 22 4.1%Fitzgerald Public Schools 13 2.4%Roseville Community Schools 12 2.3%East Detroit Public Schools 11 2.1%Troy School District 11 2.1%Detroit City School District 10 1.9%Fraser Public Schools 8 1.5%Center Line Public Schools 7 1.3%Romeo Community Schools 7 1.3%Van Dyke Public Schools 7 1.3%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 5 0.9%Mount Clemens Community School District 4 0.8%Lamphere Public Schools 3 0.6%Madison District Public Schools 3 0.6%Ferndale Public Schools 2 0.4%Lakeview Public Schools (Macomb) 2 0.4%Other 6 1.1%

Total Number of Districts: 24

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 64.3% 50.6% 13.7% 65.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 69.4% 67.9% 1.5% 65.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 57.4% 70.3% -12.9% 68.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 80.4% 69.4% 11.0% 66.0% 68.2%

Math 3 33.0% 23.4% 9.6% 40.1% 40.9%

Math 4 52.1% 46.2% 5.9% 43.1% 44.9%

Math 5 37.8% 41.9% -4.1% 44.5% 45.7%

Math 6 60.7% 16.3% 44.4% 39.2% 40.2%

10.9% Special Education

89.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

42.9% Free

6.8% Reduced

50.4% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

27.3% ELL Student Pop.

72.7% General Education

Huron Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Huron Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2287

2483

2646

2822

2883

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2157

2350

2531

2592

2664

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

51%

48%

2010-2011

49% Students Did Not Meet Target

51% Students Met Target

2011-2012

52% Students Did Not Meet Target

48% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

57%

42%

2010-2011

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2011-2012

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Huron Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2287

2483

2646

2822

2883

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2157

2350

2531

2592

2664

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

51%

48%

2010-2011

49% Students Did Not Meet Target

51% Students Met Target

2011-2012

52% Students Did Not Meet Target

48% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

57%

42%

2010-2011

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2011-2012

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Huron Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2287

2483

2646

2822

2883

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2157

2350

2531

2592

2664

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

51%

48%

2010-2011

49% Students Did Not Meet Target

51% Students Met Target

2011-2012

52% Students Did Not Meet Target

48% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

57%

42%

2010-2011

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2011-2012

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Huron Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2287

2483

2646

2822

2883

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2157

2350

2531

2592

2664

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

51%

48%

2010-2011

49% Students Did Not Meet Target

51% Students Met Target

2011-2012

52% Students Did Not Meet Target

48% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

57%

42%

2010-2011

43% Students Did Not Meet Target

57% Students Met Target

2011-2012

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Huron Academy

African-American 19%

Asian 12%

Hispanic 5%

Caucasian 60%

Native American 0%

Other 4%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

24 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Joy Preparatory Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-8

1999

2011-2016

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82958

Grades Served AddressK-8 1129 Oakman Boulevard

Detroit, MI 48238

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management School LeadersNichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Joy Preparatory Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.

The Leona Group

52 48 40 53 39 46 48 33 35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

297

377

456 476 455424

464435

370394

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82958

Grades Served AddressK-8 1129 Oakman Boulevard

Detroit, MI 48238

Charter Contract2011-2016

Management School LeadersNichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Joy Preparatory Academy

Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.

The Leona Group

52 48 40 53 39 46 48 33 35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

297

377

456 476 455424

464435

370394

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Joy Preparatory Academy (PreK-2)1129 Oakman, Detroit, MI 48238

Joy Preparatory Academy (3-8)15055 Dexter, Detroit, MI

SCHOOL LEADERS: Nichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 30.2% 48.5% -18.3% 40.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 35.9% 38.5% -2.6% 37.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 40.0% 48.9% -8.9% 42.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 54.2% 42.9% 11.3% 42.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 25.8% 45.0% -19.2% 31.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 36.1% 38.1% -2.0% 43.0% 65.7%

Math 3 5.8% 18.2% -12.4% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 13.2% 0.0% 13.2% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 13.6% 2.2% 11.4% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 17.0% 5.7% 11.3% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 3.2% 7.5% -4.3% 12.1% 38.4%

Math 8 11.4% 0.0% 11.4% 9.6% 32.5%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

93.1% Free

2.8% Reduced

4.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Joy Preparatory Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Joy Preparatory Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 391 99.2%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 1 0.3%

Total Number of Districts: 3

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 30.2% 48.5% -18.3% 40.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 35.9% 38.5% -2.6% 37.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 40.0% 48.9% -8.9% 42.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 54.2% 42.9% 11.3% 42.8% 68.2%

Reading 7 25.8% 45.0% -19.2% 31.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 36.1% 38.1% -2.0% 43.0% 65.7%

Math 3 5.8% 18.2% -12.4% 14.4% 40.9%

Math 4 13.2% 0.0% 13.2% 16.3% 44.9%

Math 5 13.6% 2.2% 11.4% 16.0% 45.7%

Math 6 17.0% 5.7% 11.3% 12.2% 40.2%

Math 7 3.2% 7.5% -4.3% 12.1% 38.4%

Math 8 11.4% 0.0% 11.4% 9.6% 32.5%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

93.1% Free

2.8% Reduced

4.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Joy Preparatory Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Joy Preparatory Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2211

2285

2684

2561

2825

2803

2889

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2142

2166

2441

2394

2536

2541

2615

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

29%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

71% Students Did Not Meet Target

29% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

10%

15%

2010-2011

90% Students Did Not Meet Target

10% Students Met Target

2011-2012

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

15% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Joy Preparatory Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2211

2285

2684

2561

2825

2803

2889

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2142

2166

2441

2394

2536

2541

2615

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

29%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

71% Students Did Not Meet Target

29% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

10%

15%

2010-2011

90% Students Did Not Meet Target

10% Students Met Target

2011-2012

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

15% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Joy Preparatory Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2211

2285

2684

2561

2825

2803

2889

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2142

2166

2441

2394

2536

2541

2615

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

29%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

71% Students Did Not Meet Target

29% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

10%

15%

2010-2011

90% Students Did Not Meet Target

10% Students Met Target

2011-2012

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

15% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Joy Preparatory Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2211

2285

2684

2561

2825

2803

2889

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2142

2166

2441

2394

2536

2541

2615

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

24%

29%

2010-2011

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2011-2012

71% Students Did Not Meet Target

29% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

10%

15%

2010-2011

90% Students Did Not Meet Target

10% Students Met Target

2011-2012

85% Students Did Not Meet Target

15% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Joy Preparatory Academy

African-American 98%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 0%

Caucasian 1%

Native American 0%

Other 1%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 25

Lighthouse Academy (SDA)

Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

K-12

2008

2013-2018

Year Opened District Code2008 2012-2013_MI-41922

Grades Served AddressK-12 3330 36th Street SE

Kentwood, MI 49508

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Lighthouse Academy

Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

1 2 3 8 11 16 34 74 79 44 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1st 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

86

166187

210

302

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2008 2012-2013_MI-41922

Grades Served AddressK-12 3330 36th Street SE

Kentwood, MI 49508

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Lighthouse Academy

Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.

Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids

1 2 3 8 11 16 34 74 79 44 30

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1st 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

86

166187

210

302

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

The Haven (9-12)1565 Cedar NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Lighthouse North (9-12)1260 Ekhart St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

St. John’s2355 Knapp St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49505

SCHOOL LEADER: Heidi Cate

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 %5.66%9.75**

Reading 4 %1.86%3.16**

Reading 5 %4.07%2.26**

Reading 6 %2.86%8.95**

Reading 7 %0.26%7.74*%3.41

Reading 8 24.1% 28.6% -4.5% 57.1% 65.7%

Reading 11 20.0% 25.9% -5.9% 41.9% 53.5%

Math 3 %9.04%5.03**

Math 4 %9.44%3.53**

Math 5 %7.54%1.53**

Math 6 %2.04%9.92**

Math 7 %4.83%9.22*%0.0

Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% 32.5%

Math 11 0.0% 7.4% -7.4% 18.7% 28.6%

30.9% Special Education

69.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.1% Free

1% Reduced

9.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0.3% ELL Student Pop.

99.7% General Education

Lighthouse Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Lighthouse Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Grand Rapids Public Schools 153 49.8%Kentwood Public Schools 108 35.2%Forest Hills Public Schools 9 2.9%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 9 2.9%Wyoming Public Schools 7 2.3%Kelloggsville Public Schools 3 1.0%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 3 1.0%Byron Center Public Schools 2 0.7%Grandville Public Schools 2 0.7%Lowell Area Schools 2 0.7%Rockford Public Schools 2 0.7%Sparta Area Schools 2 0.7%Cedar Springs Public Schools 1 0.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 1 0.3%Godwin Heights Public Schools 1 0.3%Thornapple Kellogg School District 1 0.3%Wayland Union Schools 1 0.3%

Total Number of Districts: 17

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 %5.66%9.75**

Reading 4 %1.86%3.16**

Reading 5 %4.07%2.26**

Reading 6 %2.86%8.95**

Reading 7 %0.26%7.74*%3.41

Reading 8 24.1% 28.6% -4.5% 57.1% 65.7%

Reading 11 20.0% 25.9% -5.9% 41.9% 53.5%

Math 3 %9.04%5.03**

Math 4 %9.44%3.53**

Math 5 %7.54%1.53**

Math 6 %2.04%9.92**

Math 7 %4.83%9.22*%0.0

Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% 32.5%

Math 11 0.0% 7.4% -7.4% 18.7% 28.6%

30.9% Special Education

69.1% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.1% Free

1% Reduced

9.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0.3% ELL Student Pop.

99.7% General Education

Lighthouse Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Lighthouse Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

25%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

0%

0%

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Lighthouse Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

25%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

0%

0%

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Lighthouse Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

25%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

0%

0%

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Lighthouse Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

25%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

0%

0%

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Lighthouse Academy

African-American 50%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 14%

Caucasian 30%

Native American 1%

Other 5%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

15.1TARGET = 21

Lighthouse Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Grand Rapids Public Schools 153 49.8%Kentwood Public Schools 108 35.2%Forest Hills Public Schools 9 2.9%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 9 2.9%Wyoming Public Schools 7 2.3%Kelloggsville Public Schools 3 1.0%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 3 1.0%Byron Center Public Schools 2 0.7%Grandville Public Schools 2 0.7%Lowell Area Schools 2 0.7%Rockford Public Schools 2 0.7%Sparta Area Schools 2 0.7%Cedar Springs Public Schools 1 0.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 1 0.3%Godwin Heights Public Schools 1 0.3%Thornapple Kellogg School District 1 0.3%Wayland Union Schools 1 0.3%

Total Number of Districts: 17

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

Lighthouse Academy (K-12)3330 36th St, Kentwood, MI 49508

Waalkes School (9-12)701 Ball Ave. NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

* FERPA

26 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Marshall Academy

As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

MJ Management Services, Inc.

K-12

2000

2010-2015

Year Opened District Code2000 2012-2013_MI-13903

Grades Served AddressK-12 18203 Homer Road

Marshall, MI 49068

Charter Contract2010-2015

Management HeadmasterBrent Swan

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Marshall Academy

As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.

MJ Management Services, Inc.

25 18 20 19 20 20 17 19 20 26 17 16 7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

244224 215 214

184

226

263 269 273244

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2000 2012-2013_MI-13903

Grades Served AddressK-12 18203 Homer Road

Marshall, MI 49068

Charter Contract2010-2015

Management HeadmasterBrent Swan

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Marshall Academy

As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.

MJ Management Services, Inc.

25 18 20 19 20 20 17 19 20 26 17 16 7

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

244224 215 214

184

226

263 269 273244

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

18203 Homer RoadMarshall, MI 49068

SCHOOL LEADER: Brent Swan

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 61.1% 38.1% 23.0% 62.7% 66.5%

Reading 4 66.7% 57.9% 8.8% 70.2% 68.1%

Reading 5 55.6% 65.0% -9.4% 63.3% 70.4%

Reading 6 68.8% 55.0% 13.8% 66.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 83.3% 75.0% 8.3% 53.8% 62.0%

Reading 8 68.4% 60.0% 8.4% 57.4% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%6.05*%3.35

Math 3 38.9% 14.3% 24.6% 41.6% 40.9%

Math 4 44.4% 50.0% -5.6% 48.4% 44.9%

Math 5 72.2% 15.0% 57.2% 47.5% 45.7%

Math 6 26.7% 21.1% 5.6% 43.7% 40.2%

Math 7 50.0% 54.2% -4.2% 34.8% 38.4%

Math 8 47.4% 20.0% 27.4% 26.6% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%2.62*%3.31

11.5% Special Education

88.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

22.1% Free

0% Reduced

77.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Marshall Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Marshall Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%

Total Number of Districts: 15

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 61.1% 38.1% 23.0% 62.7% 66.5%

Reading 4 66.7% 57.9% 8.8% 70.2% 68.1%

Reading 5 55.6% 65.0% -9.4% 63.3% 70.4%

Reading 6 68.8% 55.0% 13.8% 66.0% 68.2%

Reading 7 83.3% 75.0% 8.3% 53.8% 62.0%

Reading 8 68.4% 60.0% 8.4% 57.4% 65.7%

Reading 11 %5.35%6.05*%3.35

Math 3 38.9% 14.3% 24.6% 41.6% 40.9%

Math 4 44.4% 50.0% -5.6% 48.4% 44.9%

Math 5 72.2% 15.0% 57.2% 47.5% 45.7%

Math 6 26.7% 21.1% 5.6% 43.7% 40.2%

Math 7 50.0% 54.2% -4.2% 34.8% 38.4%

Math 8 47.4% 20.0% 27.4% 26.6% 32.5%

Math 11 %6.82%2.62*%3.31

11.5% Special Education

88.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

22.1% Free

0% Reduced

77.9% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Marshall Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Marshall Academy

African-American 2%

Asian 1%

Hispanic 12%

Caucasian 83%

Native American 0%

Other 2%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

17.9TARGET = 21

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Marshall Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2319

2545

2561

2734

2833

3025

3119

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2191

2474

2468

2620

2669

2943

2992

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

49%

54%

2010-2011

51% Students Did Not Meet Target

49% Students Met Target

2011-2012

46% Students Did Not Meet Target

54% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

60%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

40% Students Did Not Meet Target

60% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Marshall Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2319

2545

2561

2734

2833

3025

3119

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2191

2474

2468

2620

2669

2943

2992

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

49%

54%

2010-2011

51% Students Did Not Meet Target

49% Students Met Target

2011-2012

46% Students Did Not Meet Target

54% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

60%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

40% Students Did Not Meet Target

60% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Marshall Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2319

2545

2561

2734

2833

3025

3119

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2191

2474

2468

2620

2669

2943

2992

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

49%

54%

2010-2011

51% Students Did Not Meet Target

49% Students Met Target

2011-2012

46% Students Did Not Meet Target

54% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

60%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

40% Students Did Not Meet Target

60% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Marshall Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2319

2545

2561

2734

2833

3025

3119

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2191

2474

2468

2620

2669

2943

2992

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

49%

54%

2010-2011

51% Students Did Not Meet Target

49% Students Met Target

2011-2012

46% Students Did Not Meet Target

54% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

60%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

40% Students Did Not Meet Target

60% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Marshall Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%

Total Number of Districts: 15

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

Marshall Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%

Total Number of Districts: 15

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

* FERPA

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 27

Michigan ConnectionsAcademy (Cyber)

Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards. We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

Connections Academy

K-12

2010

2013-2018

Year Opened District Code2010 2012-2013_MI-33911

Grades Served AddressK-12 2140 University Park Drive

Okemos, MI 48864

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management Superintendent/PrincipalBryan Klochack

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Michigan Connections Academy

Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards.  We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.

Connections Academy

33 39 59 59 56 72 80 75 86 62 105

44 45

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

375

663

815

0100

200

300

400500

600

700

800900

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code2010 2012-2013_MI-33911

Grades Served AddressK-12 2140 University Park Drive

Okemos, MI 48864

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management Superintendent/PrincipalBryan Klochack

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Michigan Connections Academy

Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards.  We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.

Connections Academy

33 39 59 59 56 72 80 75 86 62 105

44 45

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

375

663

815

0100

200

300

400500

600

700

800900

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

2140 University Park DriveOkemos, MI 48864

SCHOOL LEADER: Bryan Klochack

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 63.6% 64.4% -0.8% 59.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 80.4% 82.2% -1.8% 60.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 61.6% 77.8% -16.2% 63.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 75.0% 83.3% -8.3% 61.7% 68.2%

Reading 7 63.5% 59.6% 3.9% 54.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 73.2% 56.9% 16.3% 58.9% 65.7%

Reading 11 52.0% 37.0% 15.0% 45.8% 53.5%

Math 3 34.5% 42.2% -7.7% 33.5% 40.9%

Math 4 48.2% 37.8% 10.4% 37.5% 44.9%

Math 5 43.8% 33.3% 10.5% 37.4% 45.7%

Math 6 23.7% 19.0% 4.7% 32.0% 40.2%

Math 7 31.1% 36.2% -5.1% 30.5% 38.4%

Math 8 17.1% 7.8% 9.3% 25.1% 32.5%

Math 11 29.2% 19.2% 10.0% 21.0% 28.6%

10.5% Special Education

89.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

49.8% Free

11.4% Reduced

38.8% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Michigan Connections Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.

Michigan Connections Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 154 18.7%Lansing Public School District 19 2.3%Plymouth-Canton Community Schools 13 1.6%Bendle Public Schools 12 1.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 12 1.5%Port Huron Area School District 10 1.2%Utica Community Schools 10 1.2%Flint, School District of the City of 9 1.1%Brandon School District in the Counties of Oakland 8 1.0%Coldwater Community Schools 8 1.0%Holland City School District 8 1.0%Ann Arbor Public Schools 7 0.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 7 0.8%Chelsea School District 7 0.8%Kalamazoo Public Schools 7 0.8%Livonia Public Schools School District 7 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 7 0.8%Stockbridge Community Schools 7 0.8%Dearborn Heights School District #7 6 0.7%Other 507 61.5%

Total Number of Districts: 245

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 63.6% 64.4% -0.8% 59.5% 66.5%

Reading 4 80.4% 82.2% -1.8% 60.8% 68.1%

Reading 5 61.6% 77.8% -16.2% 63.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 75.0% 83.3% -8.3% 61.7% 68.2%

Reading 7 63.5% 59.6% 3.9% 54.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 73.2% 56.9% 16.3% 58.9% 65.7%

Reading 11 52.0% 37.0% 15.0% 45.8% 53.5%

Math 3 34.5% 42.2% -7.7% 33.5% 40.9%

Math 4 48.2% 37.8% 10.4% 37.5% 44.9%

Math 5 43.8% 33.3% 10.5% 37.4% 45.7%

Math 6 23.7% 19.0% 4.7% 32.0% 40.2%

Math 7 31.1% 36.2% -5.1% 30.5% 38.4%

Math 8 17.1% 7.8% 9.3% 25.1% 32.5%

Math 11 29.2% 19.2% 10.0% 21.0% 28.6%

10.5% Special Education

89.5% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

49.8% Free

11.4% Reduced

38.8% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Michigan Connections Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Michigan Connections Academy

African-American 29%

Asian 3%

Hispanic 4%

Caucasian 59%

Native American 0%

Other 5%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

20.8TARGET = 21

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Michigan Connections Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Michigan Connections Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Michigan Connections Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Michigan Connections Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

NA

0%

NA

2010-2011

100% Students Did Not Meet Target

0% Students Met Target

2011-2012

2012-2013

No Data Available

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Michigan Connections Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 154 18.7%Lansing Public School District 19 2.3%Plymouth-Canton Community Schools 13 1.6%Bendle Public Schools 12 1.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 12 1.5%Port Huron Area School District 10 1.2%Utica Community Schools 10 1.2%Flint, School District of the City of 9 1.1%Brandon School District in the Counties of Oakland 8 1.0%Coldwater Community Schools 8 1.0%Holland City School District 8 1.0%Ann Arbor Public Schools 7 0.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 7 0.8%Chelsea School District 7 0.8%Kalamazoo Public Schools 7 0.8%Livonia Public Schools School District 7 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 7 0.8%Stockbridge Community Schools 7 0.8%Dearborn Heights School District #7 6 0.7%Other 507 61.5%

Total Number of Districts: 245

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

28 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

New Bedford Academy

New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

MJ Management Services, Inc.

K-8

1998

2013-2018

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-58901

Grades Served AddressK-8 6315 Secor

Lambertville, MI 48144

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management School LeaderGreg Sauter

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

New Bedford Academy

New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.

MJ Management Services, Inc.

21 25 19 15 16 11 16 16 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

121

146166 162

144 141 139150

168 159

020

40

60

80100

120

140

160180

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-58901

Grades Served AddressK-8 6315 Secor

Lambertville, MI 48144

Charter Contract2013-2018

Management School LeaderGreg Sauter

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

New Bedford Academy

New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.

MJ Management Services, Inc.

21 25 19 15 16 11 16 16 20

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

121

146166 162

144 141 139150

168 159

020

40

60

80100

120

140

160180

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

6315 SecorLambertville, MI 48144

SCHOOL LEADER: Greg Sauter

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 66.7% 50.0% 16.7% 80.6% 66.5%

Reading 4 62.5% 71.4% -8.9% 79.3% 68.1%

Reading 5 81.8% 84.2% -2.4% 79.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 80.0% 94.1% -14.1% 77.1% 68.2%

Reading 7 66.7% 55.0% 11.7% 72.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 70.0% 42.9% 27.1% 73.6% 65.7%

Math 3 26.7% 37.5% -10.8% 49.6% 40.9%

Math 4 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 56.3% 44.9%

Math 5 54.5% 31.6% 22.9% 56.9% 45.7%

Math 6 40.0% 23.5% 16.5% 42.3% 40.2%

Math 7 13.3% 30.0% -16.7% 50.6% 38.4%

Math 8 25.0% 14.3% 10.7% 41.7% 32.5%

6.3% Special Education

93.7% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

25.8% Free

7.5% Reduced

66.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

New Bedford Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.New Bedford Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Bedford Public Schools 121 76.1%Mason Consolidated Schools (Monroe) 24 15.1%Dundee Community Schools 5 3.1%Coldwater Community Schools 4 2.5%Ida Public School District 2 1.3%Blissfield Community Schools 1 0.6%Monroe Public Schools 1 0.6%Whiteford Agricultural School District of the Coun 1 0.6%

Total Number of Districts: 8

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 66.7% 50.0% 16.7% 80.6% 66.5%

Reading 4 62.5% 71.4% -8.9% 79.3% 68.1%

Reading 5 81.8% 84.2% -2.4% 79.5% 70.4%

Reading 6 80.0% 94.1% -14.1% 77.1% 68.2%

Reading 7 66.7% 55.0% 11.7% 72.9% 62.0%

Reading 8 70.0% 42.9% 27.1% 73.6% 65.7%

Math 3 26.7% 37.5% -10.8% 49.6% 40.9%

Math 4 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 56.3% 44.9%

Math 5 54.5% 31.6% 22.9% 56.9% 45.7%

Math 6 40.0% 23.5% 16.5% 42.3% 40.2%

Math 7 13.3% 30.0% -16.7% 50.6% 38.4%

Math 8 25.0% 14.3% 10.7% 41.7% 32.5%

6.3% Special Education

93.7% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

25.8% Free

7.5% Reduced

66.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

New Bedford Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

New Bedford Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2046

2389

2608

3058

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2127

2471

2587

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

62%

53%

2010-2011

38% Students Did Not Meet Target

62% Students Met Target

2011-2012

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

52%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

48% Students Did Not Meet Target

52% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

New Bedford Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2046

2389

2608

3058

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2127

2471

2587

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

62%

53%

2010-2011

38% Students Did Not Meet Target

62% Students Met Target

2011-2012

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

52%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

48% Students Did Not Meet Target

52% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

New Bedford Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2046

2389

2608

3058

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2127

2471

2587

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

62%

53%

2010-2011

38% Students Did Not Meet Target

62% Students Met Target

2011-2012

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

52%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

48% Students Did Not Meet Target

52% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

New Bedford Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2046

2389

2608

3058

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2127

2471

2587

2819

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

62%

53%

2010-2011

38% Students Did Not Meet Target

62% Students Met Target

2011-2012

47% Students Did Not Meet Target

53% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

42%

52%

2010-2011

58% Students Did Not Meet Target

42% Students Met Target

2011-2012

48% Students Did Not Meet Target

52% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

New Bedford Academy

African-American 6%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 7%

Caucasian 87%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 29

Northridge Academy

Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring,and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to developwell educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-8

1999

2010-2015

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-25904

Grades Served AddressK-8 530 W. Pierson Road

Flint, MI 48505

Charter Contract2010-2015

Management School LeaderLatricia Brown-Coates

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Northridge Academy

Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring, and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to develop well-educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.

The Leona Group

28 29 34 31 25 25 39 28 25

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

341319

348

267230

190

264293 276 264

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-25904

Grades Served AddressK-8 530 W. Pierson Road

Flint, MI 48505

Charter Contract2010-2015

Management School LeaderLatricia Brown-Coates

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Northridge Academy

Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring, and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to develop well-educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.

The Leona Group

28 29 34 31 25 25 39 28 25

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

341319

348

267230

190

264293 276 264

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

530 W. Pierson RoadFlint, MI 48505

SCHOOL LEADER: Latricia Brown-Coates

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 60.6% 30.0% 30.6% 38.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 38.5% 39.3% -0.8% 36.5% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.6% 37.5% -2.9% 40.3% 70.4%

Reading 6 41.7% 22.9% 18.8% 41.3% 68.2%

Reading 7 46.2% 11.1% 35.1% 21.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 43.5% 20.9% 22.6% 27.6% 65.7%

Math 3 45.5% 6.7% 38.8% 17.2% 40.9%

Math 4 48.0% 3.6% 44.4% 16.4% 44.9%

Math 5 19.2% 16.7% 2.5% 18.7% 45.7%

Math 6 22.2% 5.7% 16.5% 17.2% 40.2%

Math 7 34.6% 2.8% 31.8% 9.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 2.3% 2.0% 4.5% 32.5%

8.2% Special Education

91.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

98.9% Free

0% Reduced

1.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Northridge Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Northridge Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Flint, School District of the City of 261 97.0%Beecher Community School District 7 2.6%Swartz Creek Community Schools 1 0.4%

Total Number of Districts: 3

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 60.6% 30.0% 30.6% 38.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 38.5% 39.3% -0.8% 36.5% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.6% 37.5% -2.9% 40.3% 70.4%

Reading 6 41.7% 22.9% 18.8% 41.3% 68.2%

Reading 7 46.2% 11.1% 35.1% 21.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 43.5% 20.9% 22.6% 27.6% 65.7%

Math 3 45.5% 6.7% 38.8% 17.2% 40.9%

Math 4 48.0% 3.6% 44.4% 16.4% 44.9%

Math 5 19.2% 16.7% 2.5% 18.7% 45.7%

Math 6 22.2% 5.7% 16.5% 17.2% 40.2%

Math 7 34.6% 2.8% 31.8% 9.5% 38.4%

Math 8 4.3% 2.3% 2.0% 4.5% 32.5%

8.2% Special Education

91.8% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

98.9% Free

0% Reduced

1.1% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Northridge Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Northridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2173

2378

2628

2673

2648

2848

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2402

2431

2489

2457

2628

2659

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

20%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

31%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

69% Students Did Not Meet Target

31% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Northridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2173

2378

2628

2673

2648

2848

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2402

2431

2489

2457

2628

2659

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

20%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

31%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

69% Students Did Not Meet Target

31% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Northridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2173

2378

2628

2673

2648

2848

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2402

2431

2489

2457

2628

2659

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

20%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

31%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

69% Students Did Not Meet Target

31% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Northridge Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2173

2378

2628

2673

2648

2848

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2402

2431

2489

2457

2628

2659

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

26%

20%

2010-2011

74% Students Did Not Meet Target

26% Students Met Target

2011-2012

80% Students Did Not Meet Target

20% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

21%

31%

2010-2011

79% Students Did Not Meet Target

21% Students Met Target

2011-2012

69% Students Did Not Meet Target

31% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Northridge Academy

African-American 98%

Asian 2%

Hispanic 0%

Caucasian 0%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

30 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, iscommitted to providing a safe, high quality educational program, which willmeet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels andwill promote high principles of character and citizenship.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-8

1998

2008-2013

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82939

Grades Served AddressK-8 2450 S. Beatrice

Detroit, MI 48217

Charter Contract2008-2013

Management School LeaderStephen Turk

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, is committed to providing a safe, high-quality educational program, which will meet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels and will promote high principles of character and citizenship.

The Leona Group

37 41 38 35 45 45 44 35 46

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

376 384359 365 377

403455

392 370 366

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82939

Grades Served AddressK-8 2450 S. Beatrice

Detroit, MI 48217

Charter Contract2008-2013

Management School LeaderStephen Turk

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, is committed to providing a safe, high-quality educational program, which will meet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels and will promote high principles of character and citizenship.

The Leona Group

37 41 38 35 45 45 44 35 46

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

376 384359 365 377

403455

392 370 366

050

100150200250300350400450500

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

2450 S. BeatriceDetroit, MI 48217

SCHOOL LEADER: Stephen Turk

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 16.7% 19.5% -2.8% 36.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 26.2% 32.0% -5.8% 36.3% 68.1%

Reading 5 31.1% 28.3% 2.8% 39.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 34.9% 30.0% 4.9% 40.2% 68.2%

Reading 7 22.9% 22.0% 0.9% 31.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 38.1% 48.6% -10.5% 40.0% 65.7%

Math 3 13.9% 11.9% 2.0% 15.3% 40.9%

Math 4 11.9% 14.0% -2.1% 14.9% 44.9%

Math 5 24.4% 10.6% 13.8% 12.7% 45.7%

Math 6 14.0% 7.5% 6.5% 11.1% 40.2%

Math 7 11.4% 10.0% 1.4% 10.5% 38.4%

Math 8 7.1% 2.9% 4.2% 8.6% 32.5%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92.6% Free

1.4% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Pierre Toussaint Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 210 56.5%River Rouge, School District of the City of 97 26.1%Ecorse Public Schools 44 11.8%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 9 2.4%Taylor School District 4 1.1%Dearborn City School District 3 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 2 0.5%Melvindale-North Allen Park Schools 1 0.3%School District of the City of Inkster 1 0.3%Woodhaven-Brownstown School District 1 0.3%

Total Number of Districts: 10

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 16.7% 19.5% -2.8% 36.3% 66.5%

Reading 4 26.2% 32.0% -5.8% 36.3% 68.1%

Reading 5 31.1% 28.3% 2.8% 39.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 34.9% 30.0% 4.9% 40.2% 68.2%

Reading 7 22.9% 22.0% 0.9% 31.1% 62.0%

Reading 8 38.1% 48.6% -10.5% 40.0% 65.7%

Math 3 13.9% 11.9% 2.0% 15.3% 40.9%

Math 4 11.9% 14.0% -2.1% 14.9% 44.9%

Math 5 24.4% 10.6% 13.8% 12.7% 45.7%

Math 6 14.0% 7.5% 6.5% 11.1% 40.2%

Math 7 11.4% 10.0% 1.4% 10.5% 38.4%

Math 8 7.1% 2.9% 4.2% 8.6% 32.5%

9.1% Special Education

90.9% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

92.6% Free

1.4% Reduced

6% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

0% ELL Student Pop.

100% General Education

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2090

2265

2409

2486

2612

2670

2786

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2063

2194

2373

2452

2495

2584

2569

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

23%

18%

2010-2011

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2011-2012

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

27%

14%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

86% Students Did Not Meet Target

14% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2090

2265

2409

2486

2612

2670

2786

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2063

2194

2373

2452

2495

2584

2569

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

23%

18%

2010-2011

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2011-2012

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

27%

14%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

86% Students Did Not Meet Target

14% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2090

2265

2409

2486

2612

2670

2786

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2063

2194

2373

2452

2495

2584

2569

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

23%

18%

2010-2011

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2011-2012

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

27%

14%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

86% Students Did Not Meet Target

14% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Pierre Toussaint Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2090

2265

2409

2486

2612

2670

2786

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2063

2194

2373

2452

2495

2584

2569

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

23%

18%

2010-2011

77% Students Did Not Meet Target

23% Students Met Target

2011-2012

82% Students Did Not Meet Target

18% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

27%

14%

2010-2011

73% Students Did Not Meet Target

27% Students Met Target

2011-2012

86% Students Did Not Meet Target

14% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Pierre Toussaint Academy

African-American 99%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 1%

Caucasian 0%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 31

Voyageur Academy

Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus,and continuous hard work.

GRADES SERVED:

YEAR OPENED:

CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:

MISSION STATEMENT:

OPERATIONAL STATUS:

ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:

STUDENTS BY GRADE:

MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):

ETHNICITY:

The Leona Group

K-12

1998

2009-2014

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82940

Grades Served AddressK-12 4321 N. Military

Detroit, MI 48210

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderRod Atkins

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Voyageur Academy

Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus, and continuous hard work.

The Leona Group

66 57 49 83 58 61 66 89 60 104

109

111

95

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

570656 707 752 746 786 797 822 834

1,008

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82940

Grades Served AddressK-12 4321 N. Military

Detroit, MI 48210

Charter Contract2009-2014

Management School LeaderRod Atkins

Mission Statement

Chart 2

Chart 3

Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data

Contract Term: FSU

ESP: FSU

Mission Stmt: FSU

Demographics

Sources:

Number of Students in Each Grade

Enrollment by Year

Voyageur Academy

Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus, and continuous hard work.

The Leona Group

66 57 49 83 58 61 66 89 60 104

109

111

95

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

570656 707 752 746 786 797 822 834

1,008

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

03-0

4

04-0

5

05-0

6

06-0

7

07-0

8

08-0

9

09-1

0

10-1

1

11-1

2

12-1

3

Voyageur Academy (K-8)4321 N. Military, Detroit, MI 48210

Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210

SCHOOL LEADER: Rod Atkins

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.9% 36.2% -1.3% 41.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 37.5% 37.7% -0.2% 38.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.4% 54.3% -19.9% 43.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 38.1% 40.0% -1.9% 43.6% 68.2%

Reading 7 28.7% 24.4% 4.3% 32.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 34.4% 25.0% 9.4% 43.7% 65.7%

Reading 11 19.4% 25.3% -5.9% 30.5% 53.5%

Math 3 9.5% 12.1% -2.6% 15.3% 40.9%

Math 4 19.3% 20.8% -1.5% 17.2% 44.9%

Math 5 24.6% 28.3% -3.7% 16.9% 45.7%

Math 6 28.6% 46.0% -17.4% 13.0% 40.2%

Math 7 11.5% 19.5% -8.0% 12.9% 38.4%

Math 8 8.2% 7.1% 1.1% 10.2% 32.5%

Math 11 1.0% 1.3% -0.3% 6.5% 28.6%

10% Special Education

90% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.3% Free

2% Reduced

8.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

1.4% ELL Student Pop.

98.6% General Education

Voyageur Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY

GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)

COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Voyageur Academy 2012-2013

Students' Resident District

Number of Students from

Resident District

Percent of Students from

Resident District

Detroit City School District 962 94.2%South Redford School District 9 0.9%Huron Valley Schools 7 0.7%Southfield Public School District 7 0.7%Dearborn Heights School District #7 4 0.4%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 4 0.4%Ecorse Public Schools 3 0.3%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 3 0.3%River Rouge, School District of the City of 3 0.3%East Detroit Public Schools 2 0.2%School District of the City of Inkster 2 0.2%Wyandotte, School District of the City of 2 0.2%Other 13 1.3%

Total Number of Districts: 25

1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System

2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file

3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding

Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM

SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE

COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE

Reading 3 34.9% 36.2% -1.3% 41.1% 66.5%

Reading 4 37.5% 37.7% -0.2% 38.7% 68.1%

Reading 5 34.4% 54.3% -19.9% 43.8% 70.4%

Reading 6 38.1% 40.0% -1.9% 43.6% 68.2%

Reading 7 28.7% 24.4% 4.3% 32.2% 62.0%

Reading 8 34.4% 25.0% 9.4% 43.7% 65.7%

Reading 11 19.4% 25.3% -5.9% 30.5% 53.5%

Math 3 9.5% 12.1% -2.6% 15.3% 40.9%

Math 4 19.3% 20.8% -1.5% 17.2% 44.9%

Math 5 24.6% 28.3% -3.7% 16.9% 45.7%

Math 6 28.6% 46.0% -17.4% 13.0% 40.2%

Math 7 11.5% 19.5% -8.0% 12.9% 38.4%

Math 8 8.2% 7.1% 1.1% 10.2% 32.5%

Math 11 1.0% 1.3% -0.3% 6.5% 28.6%

10% Special Education

90% General Education

Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013

General and Special Education Status2012-2013

89.3% Free

2% Reduced

8.7% Not-Eligible

English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013

1.4% ELL Student Pop.

98.6% General Education

Voyageur Academy

Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University

Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM

Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Voyageur Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2146

2380

2487

2630

2723

2657

2826

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2180

2270

2353

2430

2549

2566

2593

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

24%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

25%

16%

2010-2011

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Voyageur Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2146

2380

2487

2630

2723

2657

2826

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2180

2270

2353

2430

2549

2566

2593

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

24%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

25%

16%

2010-2011

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

READING2012-2013

Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Voyageur Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2146

2380

2487

2630

2723

2657

2826

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2180

2270

2353

2430

2549

2566

2593

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

24%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

25%

16%

2010-2011

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement

Voyageur Academy

Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM

Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS

2146

2380

2487

2630

2723

2657

2826

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Reading

GRADE

2180

2270

2353

2430

2549

2566

2593

1300

1500

1700

1900

2100

2300

2500

2700

2900

3100

3300

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Sca

led

Sco

re

Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets

Math

GRADE

NA

17%

24%

2010-2011

83% Students Did Not Meet Target

17% Students Met Target

2011-2012

76% Students Did Not Meet Target

24% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

NA

25%

16%

2010-2011

75% Students Did Not Meet Target

25% Students Met Target

2011-2012

84% Students Did Not Meet Target

16% Students Met Target

2012-2013

No Data Available

Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM

MATH2012-2013

Voyageur Academy

African-American 80%

Asian 0%

Hispanic 18%

Caucasian 2%

Native American 0%

Other 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

ACT RESULTS:

COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013

15.2TARGET = 21

Copyright © 2013 Ferris State University Charter Schools Office

Charter Schools OfficeFerris State UniversityBig Rapids, MI 49307

(231) 591-5802www.ferris.edu/charterschools