making an impact - ferris state university · making an impact in michigan ... saundra lynch betty...
TRANSCRIPT
MAKING AN
IMPACTIN MICHIGANCHARTER SCHOOLS
ANNUAL REPORT 2013
FERRIS STATE
Charter Schools OfficeUNIVERSITY
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
Welcome
Our Team
Academy Board of Directors
Highlights & Accomplishments
By the Numbers
MEAP Results
Ferris Charter School Locations
TABLE OF CONTENTS
12 Academy Profiles
4 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Each of us at the Ferris State University Charter Schools Office (CSO) is pleased to present the 2012-13 Annual Report. Our goal in this document is to provide a broad overview of the FSU-authorized public school academies, and to give the reader a sense of the scope and reach of the University in the Pre-K-12 charter school arena.
While some basic performance data is included in this report, it was not practical nor our intent to include all data for each academy. Readers who wish to gather more information in this area are directed to the CSO website: ferris.edu/charterschools. It is there that one can find a wealth of performance data on each academy.
The CSO strives to provide the highest quality of oversight and accountability to the academies authorized by Ferris State University, and we take the daily education of nearly 10,000 students as a solemn responsibility as an authorizer. Our Mission speaks of “Continuous Quality Improvement” and it is the expectation of each of our academies, and equally important, the expectations of our office as well. Thank you for taking the time to get to know more about the FSU-authorized academies and the extraordinary work being accomplished by caring and skilled educators throughout our State.
Ronald S. Rizzo, Ph.D. Interim Director
FROM THE DIRECTOR:
Gary Granger, Chair
Alisha M. Baker
Paul E. Boyer
Erin R. Brown
Lori A. Gwizdala
D. William Lakin, OD
Arthur L. Tebo
Sueann L. Walz
BOARD OF TRUSTEES:
Dr. David L. EislerPresident, Ferris State University
Dr. Fritz Erickson
Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 5
OUR TEAM
Ferris State University will be recognized as an exemplary authorizer of Public School Academies.
This will be evidenced by the performance of our Public School Academies as follows:
Meeting or exceeding State requirements, including AYP
Meeting or exceeding
the standard of the Growth to Standard
student achievement
rubric
Meeting or exceeding an
overall Meeting Standards score on the Charter Schools Office
rubrics
Achieving 100% compliance on
all reporting requirements
(AOIS)
Meeting all contractual obligations
and the requirements of
law
The Ferris State University Charter Schools Office recommends authorization of Public School Academies and provides oversight focused on continuous quality improvement.
OUR VISION
OUR MISSION
Top from left: Don Haist, Jim Scholten, Susan Lewis, John Hackett, Lee Robinson, Art Willick Bottom from left: Linda Hayes, Mindy Britton, Phyllis Robinson, Ron Rizzo
6 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
ACADEMY BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2012-2013
Allen AcademyJames R. Blanks, PresidentFr. Ronald DeHondtKaren FranklinDavid GlowackiLillis JamesIvan JohnsonMuriel Pryor-Murphy
Benton Harbor Charter SchoolN. Jean Nesbitt, PresidentGlenda BellWalter BrownSaundra LynchBetty MasonWillie MitchellRobert Snyder
Bridge AcademyNajma Jamaludeen, PresidentToyab Al-BariJamal AljahmiFahmi HusainGhassan ShihabAhmad Tousis
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)Gale LaRoche, PresidentPatricia ClaramuntKatherine CrossleyMarvel DavisJeanne MartensSr. Janice RushmanLisa Sasaki
Conner Creek Academy EastAmanda Allen, PresidentDavid ChegashFrank DoriaTodd HouseworthDarnicia SimleyGregory WhiteCaroline Wolfrom
Creative Technologies AcademyJeremy Burgin, PresidentScott Edwards, PresidentKim de BruinStephen PhelpsLucas SmithJulie WheelerAndrew Willis
Francis Reh Public School AcademyJeannine Belton, PresidentSr. Maria BeckmanWillie F. CaseyStanley Krajkowski, PresidentCatherine KretzPenny LichonMarsha Wilson
George Crockett AcademyWilliam Smith, PresidentLisa Bey-KnightJoshua KeagleJessie Stegger
Hope Academy of West MichiganWilliam Haverkamp, PresidentBarth Roberts, PresidentLaurel ChristensenAlfonso ClarkLeslie CummingsDennis CusonWilliam Kirby
Hope of Detroit AcademyThomas Rys, PresidentJoe GappyErin IrwinDanielle JacksonRoslyn LovePatricia Ouellette
Huron AcademyJeffrey Duchene, PresidentKatherine ColomboColleen DickeySuzan KaradshehJames PernaRamzi Twal
Joy Preparatory AcademyPaul Neitman, PresidentLynese DavisKathleen GivensCharles NuttPatricia OwensGeorge Waters
Lighthouse Academy (SDA)Daniel VanderArk, PresidentWendy JohnsonBrenda KingGregory LambertGarry ReendersMarvin VanderVlietGordon VanHarn
Marshall AcademyJohn Swett, PresidentSteven AndersonPatti CornwellBrenda HowreyMary Louise KempinskiDavid Twiss
Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)Linda Frost, PresidentAndrew BellingarErvin BrinkerTodd TerryRandall Zylstra
New Bedford AcademyJennifer Cherry, PresidentCynthia DressJohn McNultyIvy NemethTimothy RothmanShanyn StewartKelly TuckerDean Vollmar
Northridge AcademyCharles Winfrey, PresidentAuthur EvansDiona McLaughlinCecilia Miller-SimsRose MurphySybil SharpJames ShelleyPatricia Watson
Pierre Toussaint AcademyDaryl Carson, PresidentEarleen McDanielDennis NordmoeMonique SharpeCurtis Smith
Voyageur AcademyJoseph Rush, PresidentCurtis Wade, PresidentDarryl BarnesMinika BenningJudith DonnellMattie EllisBarbara Smith
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 7
School Leadership Institute
New for the 2012-13 year, the CSO held three School Leadership Institutes (SLI) in 2012-13. Administrators, curriculum directors, assessment personnel and members of the academy school improvement teams were invited to attend the all-day workshops at no cost. Each highly interactive workshop centered on a particular educational theme or aspect of educational leadership. Presenters ranged from CSO staff to nationally known speakers and presenters.
Data Teams
Based on the model from the Leadership and Learning Center in Boulder, Colorado, schools were encouraged to form Data Teams. Workshops, webinars, and personal in-service academy presentations were given by certified CSO Data Team trainers as well as trainers from the Center. Data Teams focus on analyzing student performance data, and then formulating interventions for students who seem to be struggling with certain concepts and ideas.
Board Dinner and Development
In its ongoing series of development opportunities for academy Board members, the CSO held workshops and webinars for members of academy Boards. The Dinner and Development series allows for the exchange of ideas and rich conversation around topics of interest to academy governing boards, including student achievement, school finance, and differentiated authorizing.
HIGHLIGHTS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS
In an effort to help academies boost student performance, the CSO embarkedon an initiative to bring best practices and current educational thought to teachers and administrators at each FSU-authorized academy. Some new initiatives were initiated this year and existing practices were enhanced to help develop academy staff and members of the Board of Directors in their respective roles:
CSO Invests in PEOPLE
8 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
BY THE NUMBERS
19SCHOOLS
7OPERATORS
9,519TOTAL K-12 ENROLLMENT FOR 2012-2013
ACADEMY
Allen Academy 1,026
Benton Harbor Charter School 403
Bridge Academy 659
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 160
Conner Creek Academy East 1,126
Creative Technologies Academy 303
Francis Reh Public School Academy 415
George Crockett Academy 364
Hope Academy of West Michigan 403
Hope of Detroit Academy 575
Huron Academy 532
Joy Preparatory Academy 394
Lighthouse Academy (SDA) 290
Marshall Academy 243
Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber) 818
New Bedford Academy 159
Northridge Academy 268
Pierre Toussaint Academy 366
Voyageur Academy 1,015* UNAUDITED
ENROLLMENT
MANAGEMENTCOMPANY SCHOOLS
The Leona Group 8
Choice Schools 1
Global Educational Excellence 1
CS Partners 2
Integrity Educational Services 2
MJ Management Services, Inc. 2
Connections Academy 1
Self-Managed 1
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 9
7DEMOGRAPHICSEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdEthnicity Free and Reduced Price Lunch Special EdFREE/REDUCED
PRICE LUNCHSPECIAL EDUCATION
57% African-American
2% Asian 12% Hispanic 28% Caucasian
2% Other 0% Native American
80% Free/Reduced Price Lunch20% Non-Free/Reduced Price Lunch
12% Special Education Population88% General Education Population
FISCAL SUMMARY
AVERAGE
ACT S C O R E
16.6
BY THE NUMBERS
ACADEMY ACT SCORE
Allen Academy 15.0
Conner Creek Academy East 16.5
Creative Technologies Academy 18.7
Hope Academy of West Michigan 13.4
Hope Academy of Detroit *
Lighthouse Academy 15.1
Marshall Academy 17.9
Michigan Connections Academy 20.8
Voyageur Academy 15.2
*FERPA – 10 or less students is considered to contain student identifiable data and cannot be published.
ACADEMY
15.0
16.5
18.7
13.4
*
15.1
17.9
20.8
15.2
ACT SCORE
Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)
Allen Academy
Conner Creek Academy East
Creative Technologies Academy
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Hope of Detroit Academy
Lighthouse Academy (SDA)
Marshall Academy
Voyageur Academy
ACADEMY
Allen Academy $7,110
Benton Harbor Charter School 6,966
Bridge Academy 6,966
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 7,110
Conner Creek Academy East 7,110
Creative Technologies Academy 6,966
Francis Reh Public School Academy 7,094
George Crockett Academy 7,110
Hope Academy of West Michigan 7,026
Hope of Detroit Academy 7,110
Huron Academy 7,110
Joy Preparatory Academy 7,110
Lighthouse Academy (SDA) 7,089
Marshall Academy 6,966
Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber) 7,110
New Bedford Academy 6,966
Northridge Academy 7,110
Pierre Toussaint Academy 7,110
Voyageur Academy 7,110
FOUNDATION ALLOWANCE
10 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
BENTON HARBOR
Allen Academy
Benton HarborCharter School
Bridge Academy
Clara B. Ford Academy
Conner CreekAcademy East
Creative Technologies Academy
Francis Reh Public School Academy
George Crockett Academy
Hope Academyof West Michigan
Hope of Detroit Academy
Huron Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy
Lighthouse Academy
MarshallAcademy
New Bedford Academy
Northridge Academy
Pierre Toussaint Academy Voyageur Academy
GRAND RAPIDS
SAGINAW
LANSING
BIG RAPIDS
FLINT
DETROIT
METRODETROIT
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY
CHARTER SCHOOL LOCATIONS
MichiganConnectionsAcademy
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITYCharter Schools Office
MEAP RESULTS FALL 2012
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
READING MATH
ACADEMY PERCENTAGE
34.5%
9.6%
47.2%
20.3%
44.7%
29.1%
38.0%
12.5%
66.0%
44.0%
S36.4%
16.8%
46.8%
17.4%
21.0%
3.5%
44.5%
19.6%
67.7%
45.2%
37.7%
10.9%
23.1%
3.2%
67.3%
47.2%
69.5%
32.0%
70.7%
29.3%
44.7%
29.6%
28.8%
14.0%
34.3%
16.2%
*FERPA – 10 or less students is considered to contain student identifiable data and cannot be published.
Allen Academy
Benton Harbor Charter School
Bridge Academy
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Conner Creek Academy East
Creative Technologies Academy
Francis Reh Public School Academy
George Crockett Academy
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Hope of Detroit Academy
Huron Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy
Lighthouse Academy (SDA)
Voyageur Academy
Marshall Academy
Michigan Connections Academy (Cyber)
New Bedford Academy
Northridge Academy
Pierre Toussaint Academy
NO DATA AVAILABLE
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 11
BENTON HARBOR
Allen Academy
Benton HarborCharter School
Bridge Academy
Clara B. Ford Academy
Conner CreekAcademy East
Creative Technologies Academy
Francis Reh Public School Academy
George Crockett Academy
Hope Academyof West Michigan
Hope of Detroit Academy
Huron Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy
Lighthouse Academy
MarshallAcademy
New Bedford Academy
Northridge Academy
Pierre Toussaint Academy Voyageur Academy
GRAND RAPIDS
SAGINAW
LANSING
BIG RAPIDS
FLINT
DETROIT
METRODETROIT
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY
CHARTER SCHOOL LOCATIONS
MichiganConnectionsAcademy
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITYCharter Schools Office
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 13
ALLEN ACADEMY
Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-12
1998
2008-2015
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82955
Grades Served AddressK-12 8666 Quincy St.
Detroit, MI 48204
Charter Contract2008-2015
Management School LeaderMonique Woodland-Phillips
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Allen Academy
Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.
The Leona Group
87 100
91 86 87 78 98 78 90 67 61 69 33
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
673546
827897 942
1,035 1,060 1,0701,003 1,025
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82955
Grades Served AddressK-12 8666 Quincy St.
Detroit, MI 48204
Charter Contract2008-2015
Management School LeaderMonique Woodland-Phillips
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Allen Academy
Allen Academy is a public school community in Detroit, serving K-12 youth and families. The school provides a safe educational environment, blending traditional and innovative techniques. We believe that academic achievement and outstanding personal excellence are attainable for all children.
The Leona Group
87 100
91 86 87 78 98 78 90 67 61 69 33
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
673546
827897 942
1,035 1,060 1,0701,003 1,025
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
8666 Quincy St.Detroit, MI 48204
SCHOOL LEADER: Monique Woodland-Phill ips
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 42.7% 33.8% 8.9% 40.2% 66.5%
Reading 4 35.7% 28.2% 7.5% 37.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 32.0% 48.5% -16.5% 43.0% 70.4%
Reading 6 44.2% 39.7% 4.5% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 23.3% 21.8% 1.5% 31.3% 62.0%
Reading 8 26.7% 35.6% -8.9% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 16.7% 17.1% -0.4% 30.1% 53.5%
Math 3 13.4% 3.8% 9.6% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 14.3% 3.8% 10.5% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 14.7% 8.1% 6.6% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 10.9% 9.5% 1.4% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 1.4% 3.4% -2.0% 12.2% 38.4%
Math 8 2.3% 6.9% -4.6% 9.7% 32.5%
Math 11 1.5% 5.7% -4.2% 6.1% 28.6%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
95% Free
0.9% Reduced
4.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Allen Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Allen Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2180
2426
2541
2607
2752
2818
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2112
2322
2456
2474
2554
2602
2594
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
30%
26%
2010-2011
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
30% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
17%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
Allen Academy
African-American 100%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 0%
Caucasian 0%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Allen Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 1,026 100.0%
Total Number of Districts: 1
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 42.7% 33.8% 8.9% 40.2% 66.5%
Reading 4 35.7% 28.2% 7.5% 37.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 32.0% 48.5% -16.5% 43.0% 70.4%
Reading 6 44.2% 39.7% 4.5% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 23.3% 21.8% 1.5% 31.3% 62.0%
Reading 8 26.7% 35.6% -8.9% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 16.7% 17.1% -0.4% 30.1% 53.5%
Math 3 13.4% 3.8% 9.6% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 14.3% 3.8% 10.5% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 14.7% 8.1% 6.6% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 10.9% 9.5% 1.4% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 1.4% 3.4% -2.0% 12.2% 38.4%
Math 8 2.3% 6.9% -4.6% 9.7% 32.5%
Math 11 1.5% 5.7% -4.2% 6.1% 28.6%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
95% Free
0.9% Reduced
4.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Allen Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Allen Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2180
2426
2541
2607
2752
2818
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2112
2322
2456
2474
2554
2602
2594
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
30%
26%
2010-2011
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
30% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
17%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Allen Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2180
2426
2541
2607
2752
2818
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2112
2322
2456
2474
2554
2602
2594
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
30%
26%
2010-2011
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
30% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
17%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Allen Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2180
2426
2541
2607
2752
2818
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2112
2322
2456
2474
2554
2602
2594
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
30%
26%
2010-2011
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
30% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
17%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Allen Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2180
2426
2541
2607
2752
2818
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2112
2322
2456
2474
2554
2602
2594
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
30%
26%
2010-2011
70% Students Did Not Meet Target
30% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
17%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:18 PM
MATH2012-2013
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
15TARGET = 21
14 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Benton HarborCharter School
Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Choice Schools
PK-8
1999
2009-2014
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-11903
Grades Served AddressPK-8 455 Riverview Drive
Benton Harbor, MI 49022
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderTim Harris
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Benton Harbor Charter School
Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.
Choice Schools
82 62 61 51 37 37 28 25 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
487 468432 413
451483
396442
405 399
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-11903
Grades Served AddressPK-8 455 Riverview Drive
Benton Harbor, MI 49022
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderTim Harris
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Benton Harbor Charter School
Benton Harbor Charter School strives to provide an environment that will foster creativity, promote academic achievement and develop sound character and citizenship while maintaining and improving each child's self-esteem and self-concept. Our mission is to ensure that all students who graduate from the school are prepared to compete successfully, academically, and socially with their peers.
Choice Schools
82 62 61 51 37 37 28 25 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
487 468432 413
451483
396442
405 399
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
455 Riverview DriveBenton Harbor, MI 49022
SCHOOL LEADER: Tim Harris
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 38.3% 30.4% 7.9% 35.0% 66.5%
Reading 4 37.1% 36.1% 1.0% 31.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 51.5% 42.9% 8.6% 27.9% 70.4%
Reading 6 68.0% 36.1% 31.9% 27.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 39.1% 36.0% 3.1% 18.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 66.7% 37.9% 28.8% 27.1% 65.7%
Math 3 19.1% 15.2% 3.9% 11.8% 40.9%
Math 4 17.1% 5.6% 11.5% 8.8% 44.9%
Math 5 15.6% 19.0% -3.4% 7.0% 45.7%
Math 6 48.0% 11.1% 36.9% 7.9% 40.2%
Math 7 13.0% 25.0% -12.0% 4.3% 38.4%
Math 8 6.7% 17.2% -10.5% 2.5% 32.5%
2.8% Special Education
97.2% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Benton Harbor Charter School
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Benton Harbor Charter School 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Benton Harbor Area Schools 436 100.0%
Total Number of Districts: 1
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 38.3% 30.4% 7.9% 35.0% 66.5%
Reading 4 37.1% 36.1% 1.0% 31.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 51.5% 42.9% 8.6% 27.9% 70.4%
Reading 6 68.0% 36.1% 31.9% 27.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 39.1% 36.0% 3.1% 18.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 66.7% 37.9% 28.8% 27.1% 65.7%
Math 3 19.1% 15.2% 3.9% 11.8% 40.9%
Math 4 17.1% 5.6% 11.5% 8.8% 44.9%
Math 5 15.6% 19.0% -3.4% 7.0% 45.7%
Math 6 48.0% 11.1% 36.9% 7.9% 40.2%
Math 7 13.0% 25.0% -12.0% 4.3% 38.4%
Math 8 6.7% 17.2% -10.5% 2.5% 32.5%
2.8% Special Education
97.2% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Benton Harbor Charter School
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Benton Harbor Charter School
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2184
2400
2517
2664
2780
2886
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2187
2326
2402
2444
2700
2767
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
34%
26%
2010-2011
66% Students Did Not Meet Target
34% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
35%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Benton Harbor Charter School
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2184
2400
2517
2664
2780
2886
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2187
2326
2402
2444
2700
2767
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
34%
26%
2010-2011
66% Students Did Not Meet Target
34% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
35%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Benton Harbor Charter School
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2184
2400
2517
2664
2780
2886
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2187
2326
2402
2444
2700
2767
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
34%
26%
2010-2011
66% Students Did Not Meet Target
34% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
35%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Benton Harbor Charter School
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2184
2400
2517
2664
2780
2886
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2187
2326
2402
2444
2700
2767
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
34%
26%
2010-2011
66% Students Did Not Meet Target
34% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
18%
35%
2010-2011
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2011-2012
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Benton Harbor Charter School
African-American 93%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 5%
Caucasian 1%
Native American 0%
Other 1%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 15
To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Global Education Excellence
K-8
2011
2009-2014
Year Opened District Code2011??? 2012-2013_MI-82983
Grades Served AddressK-8 9600 Buffalo St.
Hamtramck, MI 48212
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderKhalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Bridge Academy
To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.
Global Education Excellence
62 74 78 78 76 65 64 74 88
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
309 330 350
528565 586 586
737659
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2011??? 2012-2013_MI-82983
Grades Served AddressK-8 9600 Buffalo St.
Hamtramck, MI 48212
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderKhalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Bridge Academy
To promote lifelong learning by nurturing academic excellence, positive character, and an appreciation of cultures.
Global Education Excellence
62 74 78 78 76 65 64 74 88
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
309 330 350
528565 586 586
737659
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Bridge AcademyBridge Academy - East (PreK-5)
9600 Buffalo St, Hamtramck, MI 49212
Bridge Academy - West (6-8)3105 Carpenter Rd. Detroit, MI 48212
SCHOOL LEADERS: Khalid Almasnaah, Naji Abduljaber
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 50.0% 30.6% 19.4% 46.4% 66.5%
Reading 4 45.9% 41.5% 4.4% 41.6% 68.1%
Reading 5 38.6% 30.6% 8.0% 42.9% 70.4%
Reading 6 45.3% 26.8% 18.5% 49.9% 68.2%
Reading 7 29.2% 31.4% -2.2% 40.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 56.1% 32.4% 23.7% 47.6% 65.7%
Math 3 36.4% 24.3% 12.1% 21.4% 40.9%
Math 4 41.3% 29.9% 11.4% 31.2% 44.9%
Math 5 28.3% 24.6% 3.7% 30.9% 45.7%
Math 6 27.4% 25.6% 1.8% 31.3% 40.2%
Math 7 24.7% 17.1% 7.6% 31.0% 38.4%
Math 8 17.4% 10.6% 6.8% 22.2% 32.5%
4.9% Special Education
95.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
55.7% ELL Student Pop.
44.3% General Education
Bridge Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Bridge Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Hamtramck, School District of the City of 472 71.6%Detroit City School District 177 26.9%Dearborn City School District 5 0.8%Hancock Public Schools 2 0.3%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.3%Warren Consolidated Schools 1 0.2%
Total Number of Districts: 6
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 50.0% 30.6% 19.4% 46.4% 66.5%
Reading 4 45.9% 41.5% 4.4% 41.6% 68.1%
Reading 5 38.6% 30.6% 8.0% 42.9% 70.4%
Reading 6 45.3% 26.8% 18.5% 49.9% 68.2%
Reading 7 29.2% 31.4% -2.2% 40.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 56.1% 32.4% 23.7% 47.6% 65.7%
Math 3 36.4% 24.3% 12.1% 21.4% 40.9%
Math 4 41.3% 29.9% 11.4% 31.2% 44.9%
Math 5 28.3% 24.6% 3.7% 30.9% 45.7%
Math 6 27.4% 25.6% 1.8% 31.3% 40.2%
Math 7 24.7% 17.1% 7.6% 31.0% 38.4%
Math 8 17.4% 10.6% 6.8% 22.2% 32.5%
4.9% Special Education
95.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
55.7% ELL Student Pop.
44.3% General Education
Bridge Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Bridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2253
2407
2615
2641
2697
2764
2905
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2213
2380
2493
2522
2654
2780
2859
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
35%
36%
2010-2011
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2011-2012
64% Students Did Not Meet Target
36% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
46%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
54% Students Did Not Meet Target
46% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Bridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2253
2407
2615
2641
2697
2764
2905
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2213
2380
2493
2522
2654
2780
2859
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
35%
36%
2010-2011
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2011-2012
64% Students Did Not Meet Target
36% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
46%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
54% Students Did Not Meet Target
46% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Bridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2253
2407
2615
2641
2697
2764
2905
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2213
2380
2493
2522
2654
2780
2859
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
35%
36%
2010-2011
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2011-2012
64% Students Did Not Meet Target
36% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
46%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
54% Students Did Not Meet Target
46% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Bridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2253
2407
2615
2641
2697
2764
2905
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2213
2380
2493
2522
2654
2780
2859
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
35%
36%
2010-2011
65% Students Did Not Meet Target
35% Students Met Target
2011-2012
64% Students Did Not Meet Target
36% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
46%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
54% Students Did Not Meet Target
46% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Bridge Academy
African-American 1%
Asian 21%
Hispanic 1%
Caucasian 77%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
16 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Clara B. Ford Academy(SDA)
The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
CS Partners
K-12
2007
2012-2017
Year Opened District Code2007 2012-2013_MI-82996
Grades Served AddressK-12 20651 W. Warren Ave.
Dearborn Heights, MI 48127
Charter Contract2012-2017
Management PrincipalBeverly Baroni
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.
CS Partners
2 10 9 31 56 33 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
180177
184
166 166
158
145150
155
160
165170
175
180
185190
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2007 2012-2013_MI-82996
Grades Served AddressK-12 20651 W. Warren Ave.
Dearborn Heights, MI 48127
Charter Contract2012-2017
Management PrincipalBeverly Baroni
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
The mission of Village of Hope Academies (VOHA) is to engage our students in a safe, innovative learning environment within Southeast Michigan that will enable them to function as contributing adults.
CS Partners
2 10 9 31 56 33 17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
180177
184
166 166
158
145150
155
160
165170
175
180
185190
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
20651 W. Warren Ave.Dearborn Heights, MI 48127
SCHOOL LEADER: Beverly Baroni
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 6 %2.86**
Reading 7 %0.26**
Reading 8 %7.56**
Reading 11 13.3% 18.2% -4.9% 53.5%
Math 6 %2.04**
Math 7 %4.83**
Math 8 %5.23**
Math 11 %6.82*%0.0
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
NO DATA AVAILABLE
NO DATA AVAILABLE
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA) 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Total Number of Districts: 0
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 6 %2.86**
Reading 7 %0.26**
Reading 8 %7.56**
Reading 11 13.3% 18.2% -4.9% 53.5%
Math 6 %2.04**
Math 7 %4.83**
Math 8 %5.23**
Math 11 %6.82*%0.0
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
100% Free
0% Reduced
0% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
NO DATA AVAILABLE
NO DATA AVAILABLEProof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
Reading
GRADE
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
Reading
GRADE
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Clara B. Ford Academy (SDA)
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
Reading
GRADE
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
NA
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Clara B. Ford Academy
African-American 65%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 6%
Caucasian 24%
Native American 1%
Other 4%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
* FERPA
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 17
• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
CS Partners
K-12
1999
2013-2015
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50902
Grades Served AddressK-12 19611 Eastland
Roseville, MI 48066
Charter Contract2013-2015
Management SuperintendentChuck Meredith
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Conner Creek Academy East
• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.
CS Partners
55 76 66 59 75 75 79 88 87 112
123
101
126
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Ung
689775 826 873 849 843
1,0321,120 1,124 1,123
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50902
Grades Served AddressK-12 19611 Eastland
Roseville, MI 48066
Charter Contract2013-2015
Management SuperintendentChuck Meredith
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Conner Creek Academy East
• Inspires students to become lifelong learners in a caring, supportive, and diverse environment,• Creates responsible citizens, and• Empowers students to develop their potential.
CS Partners
55 76 66 59 75 75 79 88 87 112
123
101
126
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Ung
689775 826 873 849 843
1,0321,120 1,124 1,123
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Conner Creek AcademyEast
Conner Creek Academy East (K-6)16911 Eastland, Roseville, MI 48066
Michigan Collegiate High School and Middle School (7-12)31300 Ryan Rd., Warren, MI 48092
SCHOOL LEADER: Chuck Meredith
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 32.0% 23.5% 8.5% 44.8% 66.5%
Reading 4 41.0% 31.0% 10.0% 42.4% 68.1%
Reading 5 43.1% 47.3% -4.2% 47.1% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.3% 46.1% 1.2% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.7% 27.3% 7.4% 35.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 31.0% 30.9% 0.1% 45.9% 65.7%
Reading 11 26.7% 17.5% 9.2% 32.0% 53.5%
Math 3 14.0% 12.9% 1.1% 18.3% 40.9%
Math 4 18.0% 6.9% 11.1% 20.3% 44.9%
Math 5 15.4% 5.4% 10.0% 20.5% 45.7%
Math 6 10.8% 18.4% -7.6% 16.1% 40.2%
Math 7 18.9% 13.6% 5.3% 15.7% 38.4%
Math 8 1.2% 5.7% -4.5% 12.5% 32.5%
Math 11 1.2% 1.8% -0.6% 8.3% 28.6%
14.7% Special Education
85.3% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
84% Free
4.1% Reduced
11.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Conner Creek Academy East
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.
Conner Creek Academy East 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 779 69.0%Roseville Community Schools 73 6.5%East Detroit Public Schools 72 6.4%Warren Consolidated Schools 39 3.5%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 29 2.6%Warren Woods Public Schools 29 2.6%Clintondale Community Schools 16 1.4%Utica Community Schools 12 1.1%Hamtramck, School District of the City of 10 0.9%Highland Park City Schools 8 0.7%Madison District Public Schools 7 0.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 6 0.5%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 6 0.5%Southfield Public School District 5 0.4%Fraser Public Schools 4 0.4%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 4 0.4%Van Dyke Public Schools 4 0.4%Hazel Park, School District of the City of 3 0.3%Dearborn City School District 2 0.2%Other 21 1.9%
Total Number of Districts: 34
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 32.0% 23.5% 8.5% 44.8% 66.5%
Reading 4 41.0% 31.0% 10.0% 42.4% 68.1%
Reading 5 43.1% 47.3% -4.2% 47.1% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.3% 46.1% 1.2% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.7% 27.3% 7.4% 35.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 31.0% 30.9% 0.1% 45.9% 65.7%
Reading 11 26.7% 17.5% 9.2% 32.0% 53.5%
Math 3 14.0% 12.9% 1.1% 18.3% 40.9%
Math 4 18.0% 6.9% 11.1% 20.3% 44.9%
Math 5 15.4% 5.4% 10.0% 20.5% 45.7%
Math 6 10.8% 18.4% -7.6% 16.1% 40.2%
Math 7 18.9% 13.6% 5.3% 15.7% 38.4%
Math 8 1.2% 5.7% -4.5% 12.5% 32.5%
Math 11 1.2% 1.8% -0.6% 8.3% 28.6%
14.7% Special Education
85.3% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
84% Free
4.1% Reduced
11.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Conner Creek Academy East
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Conner Creek Academy East
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2152
2310
2454
2622
2830
2707
2821
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2119
2284
2371
2518
2546
2687
2718
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
27%
24%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
17%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
15
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Conner Creek Academy East
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2152
2310
2454
2622
2830
2707
2821
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2119
2284
2371
2518
2546
2687
2718
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
27%
24%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
17%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
15
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Conner Creek Academy East
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2152
2310
2454
2622
2830
2707
2821
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2119
2284
2371
2518
2546
2687
2718
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
27%
24%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
17%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
15
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Conner Creek Academy East
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2152
2310
2454
2622
2830
2707
2821
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2119
2284
2371
2518
2546
2687
2718
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
27%
24%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
17%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
15 MATH2012-2013
Conner Creek Academy East
African-American 95%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 1%
Caucasian 3%
Native American 0%
Other 1%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
16.5TARGET = 21
Conner Creek Academy East 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 779 69.0%Roseville Community Schools 73 6.5%East Detroit Public Schools 72 6.4%Warren Consolidated Schools 39 3.5%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 29 2.6%Warren Woods Public Schools 29 2.6%Clintondale Community Schools 16 1.4%Utica Community Schools 12 1.1%Hamtramck, School District of the City of 10 0.9%Highland Park City Schools 8 0.7%Madison District Public Schools 7 0.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 6 0.5%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 6 0.5%Southfield Public School District 5 0.4%Fraser Public Schools 4 0.4%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 4 0.4%Van Dyke Public Schools 4 0.4%Hazel Park, School District of the City of 3 0.3%Dearborn City School District 2 0.2%Other 21 1.9%
Total Number of Districts: 34
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:12 PM
18 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Creative TechnologiesAcademy
Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive enviroment that develops life-long learners.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Self-Managed
K-12
1998
2007-2014
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-41918
Grades Served AddressK-12 350 Pine Street
Cedar Springs, MI 49319
Charter Contract2007-2014
Management PrincipalDan George
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Creative Technologies Academy
Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive environment that develops life-long learners.
Self-Managed
18 15 21 20 20 12 18 19 24 26 38 31 39
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
229
276298 295
264289
310 302322
301
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-41918
Grades Served AddressK-12 350 Pine Street
Cedar Springs, MI 49319
Charter Contract2007-2014
Management PrincipalDan George
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Creative Technologies Academy
Creative Technologies Academy is a K-12 learning community committed to strengthening character and promoting a safe, scholarly, and supportive environment that develops life-long learners.
Self-Managed
18 15 21 20 20 12 18 19 24 26 38 31 39
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
229
276298 295
264289
310 302322
301
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
350 Pine StreetCedar Springs, MI 49319
SCHOOL LEADER: Dan George
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 50.0% 55.0% -5.0% 66.4% 66.5%
Reading 4 77.8% 60.0% 17.8% 67.9% 68.1%
Reading 5 %4.07%5.57%9.16*
Reading 6 70.6% 62.5% 8.1% 74.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 63.2% 66.7% -3.5% 64.8% 62.0%
Reading 8 68.2% 64.3% 3.9% 67.1% 65.7%
Reading 11 41.4% 56.3% -14.9% 54.9% 53.5%
Math 3 29.4% 15.0% 14.4% 34.5% 40.9%
Math 4 61.1% 33.3% 27.8% 42.6% 44.9%
Math 5 %7.54%5.94%0.05*
Math 6 52.9% 37.5% 15.4% 35.2% 40.2%
Math 7 42.1% 22.7% 19.4% 35.4% 38.4%
Math 8 36.4% 21.4% 15.0% 25.2% 32.5%
Math 11 24.1% 21.9% 2.2% 23.8% 28.6%
15.5% Special Education
84.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
29.6% Free
0% Reduced
70.4% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Creative Technologies Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Creative Technologies Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Cedar Springs Public Schools 140 46.2%Tri County Area Schools 87 28.7%Sparta Area Schools 15 5.0%Kent City Community Schools 14 4.6%Lakeview Community Schools (Montcalm) 13 4.3%Rockford Public Schools 11 3.6%Greenville Public Schools 10 3.3%Grant Public School District 7 2.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 2 0.7%Forest Hills Public Schools 2 0.7%Newaygo Public School District 2 0.7%
Total Number of Districts: 11
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 50.0% 55.0% -5.0% 66.4% 66.5%
Reading 4 77.8% 60.0% 17.8% 67.9% 68.1%
Reading 5 %4.07%5.57%9.16*
Reading 6 70.6% 62.5% 8.1% 74.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 63.2% 66.7% -3.5% 64.8% 62.0%
Reading 8 68.2% 64.3% 3.9% 67.1% 65.7%
Reading 11 41.4% 56.3% -14.9% 54.9% 53.5%
Math 3 29.4% 15.0% 14.4% 34.5% 40.9%
Math 4 61.1% 33.3% 27.8% 42.6% 44.9%
Math 5 %7.54%5.94%0.05*
Math 6 52.9% 37.5% 15.4% 35.2% 40.2%
Math 7 42.1% 22.7% 19.4% 35.4% 38.4%
Math 8 36.4% 21.4% 15.0% 25.2% 32.5%
Math 11 24.1% 21.9% 2.2% 23.8% 28.6%
15.5% Special Education
84.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
29.6% Free
0% Reduced
70.4% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Creative Technologies Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Creative Technologies Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2222
2502
2702
2765
2905
3139
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2280
2483
2562
2638
2726
2884
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
56%
57%
2010-2011
44% Students Did Not Meet Target
56% Students Met Target
2011-2012
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
53%
55%
2010-2011
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2011-2012
45% Students Did Not Meet Target
55% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
18.7
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Creative Technologies Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2222
2502
2702
2765
2905
3139
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2280
2483
2562
2638
2726
2884
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
56%
57%
2010-2011
44% Students Did Not Meet Target
56% Students Met Target
2011-2012
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
53%
55%
2010-2011
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2011-2012
45% Students Did Not Meet Target
55% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
18.7
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Creative Technologies Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2222
2502
2702
2765
2905
3139
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2280
2483
2562
2638
2726
2884
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
56%
57%
2010-2011
44% Students Did Not Meet Target
56% Students Met Target
2011-2012
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
53%
55%
2010-2011
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2011-2012
45% Students Did Not Meet Target
55% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
18.7
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Creative Technologies Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2222
2502
2702
2765
2905
3139
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2280
2483
2562
2638
2726
2884
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
56%
57%
2010-2011
44% Students Did Not Meet Target
56% Students Met Target
2011-2012
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
53%
55%
2010-2011
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2011-2012
45% Students Did Not Meet Target
55% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
18.7 MATH2012-2013
Creative Technologies
African-American 0%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 1%
Caucasian 96%
Native American 0%
Other 3%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
18.7TARGET = 21
* FERPA
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 19
Francis RehPublic School Academy
Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Our high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
PK-8
1998
2011-2014
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-73909
Grades Served AddressPK-8 2201 Owen
Saginaw, MI 48601
Charter Contract2011-2014
Management School LeaderKate Scheid-Weber
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Francis Reh PSA
Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Ou high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.
The Leona Group
45 44 53 47 50 41 41 46 48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
275 292 306
250 256 250
343373 366
415
050
100
150
200250
300
350
400450
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-73909
Grades Served AddressPK-8 2201 Owen
Saginaw, MI 48601
Charter Contract2011-2014
Management School LeaderKate Scheid-Weber
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Francis Reh PSA
Francis Reh Public School Academy - in coordination with families and community stakeholders - will provide students a safe, nurturing and intellectually challenging environment. Ou high expectations will promote personal responsibility and academic excellence.
The Leona Group
45 44 53 47 50 41 41 46 48
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
275 292 306
250 256 250
343373 366
415
050
100
150
200250
300
350
400450
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
2201 OwenSaginaw, MI 48601
SCHOOL LEADER: Kate Scheid-Weber
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Francis Reh PSA 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Saginaw, School District of the City of 415 100.0%
Total Number of Districts: 1
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Francis Reh PSA
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2097
2283
2438
2683
2622
2797
2869
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2031
2253
2352
2509
2523
2634
2660
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
17%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
20%
12%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
88% Students Did Not Meet Target
12% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Francis Reh PSA
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2097
2283
2438
2683
2622
2797
2869
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2031
2253
2352
2509
2523
2634
2660
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
17%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
20%
12%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
88% Students Did Not Meet Target
12% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Francis Reh PSA
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2097
2283
2438
2683
2622
2797
2869
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2031
2253
2352
2509
2523
2634
2660
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
17%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
20%
12%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
88% Students Did Not Meet Target
12% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Francis Reh PSA
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2097
2283
2438
2683
2622
2797
2869
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2031
2253
2352
2509
2523
2634
2660
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
17%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
20%
12%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
88% Students Did Not Meet Target
12% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.0% 45.2% -11.2% 46.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 39.6% 37.5% 2.1% 47.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 30.8% 33.3% -2.5% 49.4% 70.4%
Reading 6 47.5% 45.9% 1.6% 47.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 34.1% 27.5% 6.6% 40.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 32.6% 31.8% 0.8% 51.8% 65.7%
Math 3 6.4% 31.0% -24.6% 21.1% 40.9%
Math 4 29.2% 25.0% 4.2% 22.6% 44.9%
Math 5 17.9% 24.2% -6.3% 22.5% 45.7%
Math 6 31.6% 24.3% 7.3% 19.2% 40.2%
Math 7 13.6% 14.6% -1.0% 19.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 4.7% -0.4% 21.3% 32.5%
15.2% Special Education
84.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92% Free
1.9% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Francis Reh PSA
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
MATH2012-2013
Francis Reh PSA
African-American 80%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 13%
Caucasian 1%
Native American 0%
Other 6%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
20 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
George Crockett Academy
George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-12
1998
2009-2014
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82937
Grades Served AddressK-12 4851 14th Street
Detroit, MI 48208
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderMary Lou Van Antwerp
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
George Crockett Academy
George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.
The Leona Group
39 46 35 40 31 38 42 28 31 17 8 4 6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
409 395 417 426 429 438 431 446420
365
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82937
Grades Served AddressK-12 4851 14th Street
Detroit, MI 48208
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderMary Lou Van Antwerp
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
George Crockett Academy
George Crockett Academy provides a nurturing, respectful and stimulating academic environment, committed to the empowerment of responsible citizens who are critical thinkers in a global society.
The Leona Group
39 46 35 40 31 38 42 28 31 17 8 4 6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
409 395 417 426 429 438 431 446420
365
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
George Crockett Academy (K-8)4851 14th St., Detroit, MI 48208
Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210
SCHOOL LEADER: Mary Lou VanAntwerp
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 52.5% 43.9% 8.6% 40.2% 66.5%
Reading 4 46.7% 37.8% 8.9% 37.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 42.9% 48.8% -5.9% 43.0% 70.4%
Reading 6 52.4% 32.6% 19.8% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 32.1% 35.1% -3.0% 31.3% 62.0%
Reading 8 50.0% 41.5% 8.5% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**
Math 3 27.5% 9.8% 17.7% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 30.0% 8.1% 21.9% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 15.8% 7.0% 8.8% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 19.0% 4.3% 14.7% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 0.0% 12.8% -12.8% 12.2% 38.4%
Math 8 6.9% 9.8% -2.9% 9.7% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%1.6**
9% Special Education
91% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
97% Free
0.5% Reduced
2.5% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
George Crockett Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.George Crockett Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 365 100.0%
Total Number of Districts: 1
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 52.5% 43.9% 8.6% 40.2% 66.5%
Reading 4 46.7% 37.8% 8.9% 37.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 42.9% 48.8% -5.9% 43.0% 70.4%
Reading 6 52.4% 32.6% 19.8% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 32.1% 35.1% -3.0% 31.3% 62.0%
Reading 8 50.0% 41.5% 8.5% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**
Math 3 27.5% 9.8% 17.7% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 30.0% 8.1% 21.9% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 15.8% 7.0% 8.8% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 19.0% 4.3% 14.7% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 0.0% 12.8% -12.8% 12.2% 38.4%
Math 8 6.9% 9.8% -2.9% 9.7% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%1.6**
9% Special Education
91% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
97% Free
0.5% Reduced
2.5% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
George Crockett Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
George Crockett Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2098
2458
2473
2613
2805
2778
2856
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2083
2371
2412
2429
2635
2532
2719
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
26%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
26%
23%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
George Crockett Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2098
2458
2473
2613
2805
2778
2856
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2083
2371
2412
2429
2635
2532
2719
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
26%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
26%
23%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
George Crockett Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2098
2458
2473
2613
2805
2778
2856
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2083
2371
2412
2429
2635
2532
2719
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
26%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
26%
23%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
George Crockett Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2098
2458
2473
2613
2805
2778
2856
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2083
2371
2412
2429
2635
2532
2719
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
26%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
26%
23%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
George Crockett Academy
African-American 100%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 0%
Caucasian 0%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
* FERPA
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 21
Hope Academyof West Michigan
Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
K-12
2011
2011-2016
Year Opened District Code2011 2012-2013_MI-41926
Grades Served AddressK-12 240 Brown Street SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49507
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
15 25 38 26 17 14 37 39 27 40 51 45 58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
295
432
050
100150200250300350400450500
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2011 2012-2013_MI-41926
Grades Served AddressK-12 240 Brown Street SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49507
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Providing RENEWED HOPE for academic success and a POSITIVE learning experience for students in our community.
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
15 25 38 26 17 14 37 39 27 40 51 45 58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
295
432
050
100150200250300350400450500
11-1
2
12-1
3
240 Brown Street SEGrand Rapids, MI 49507
SCHOOL LEADER: Heidi Cate
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 47.0% 66.5%
Reading 4 %1.86%8.45*%7.62
Reading 5 35.7% 26.3% 9.4% 52.6% 70.4%
Reading 6 20.6% 21.7% -1.1% 53.5% 68.2%
Reading 7 12.1% 18.8% -6.7% 37.7% 62.0%
Reading 8 17.4% 25.0% -7.6% 47.3% 65.7%
Reading 11 5.9% 8.3% -2.4% 38.0% 53.5%
Math 3 4.5% 14.3% -9.8% 20.4% 40.9%
Math 4 %9.44%7.62*%3.31
Math 5 7.1% 0.0% 7.1% 25.9% 45.7%
Math 6 0.0% 13.0% -13.0% 25.4% 40.2%
Math 7 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 15.0% 38.4%
Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.1% 32.5%
Math 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 28.6%
11.7% Special Education
88.3% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
80.8% Free
3.5% Reduced
15.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
4.5% ELL Student Pop.
95.5% General Education
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Hope Academy of West Michigan 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Grand Rapids Public Schools 406 91.2%Kentwood Public Schools 19 4.3%Forest Hills Public Schools 8 1.8%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 5 1.1%Wyoming Public Schools 3 0.7%Comstock Park Public Schools 2 0.4%Grandville Public Schools 1 0.2%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 1 0.2%
Total Number of Districts: 8
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 47.0% 66.5%
Reading 4 %1.86%8.45*%7.62
Reading 5 35.7% 26.3% 9.4% 52.6% 70.4%
Reading 6 20.6% 21.7% -1.1% 53.5% 68.2%
Reading 7 12.1% 18.8% -6.7% 37.7% 62.0%
Reading 8 17.4% 25.0% -7.6% 47.3% 65.7%
Reading 11 5.9% 8.3% -2.4% 38.0% 53.5%
Math 3 4.5% 14.3% -9.8% 20.4% 40.9%
Math 4 %9.44%7.62*%3.31
Math 5 7.1% 0.0% 7.1% 25.9% 45.7%
Math 6 0.0% 13.0% -13.0% 25.4% 40.2%
Math 7 3.0% 0.0% 3.0% 15.0% 38.4%
Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.1% 32.5%
Math 11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.7% 28.6%
11.7% Special Education
88.3% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
80.8% Free
3.5% Reduced
15.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
4.5% ELL Student Pop.
95.5% General Education
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2103
2726
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2131
2574
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
16%
2010-2011
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
19%
2010-2011
2011-2012
81% Students Did Not Meet Target
19% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2103
2726
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2131
2574
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
16%
2010-2011
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
19%
2010-2011
2011-2012
81% Students Did Not Meet Target
19% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2103
2726
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2131
2574
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
16%
2010-2011
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
19%
2010-2011
2011-2012
81% Students Did Not Meet Target
19% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope Academy of West Michigan
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2103
2726
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2131
2574
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
NA
16%
2010-2011
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
NA
19%
2010-2011
2011-2012
81% Students Did Not Meet Target
19% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Hope Academy of West Michigan
African-American 46%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 51%
Caucasian 3%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
13.4TARGET = 21
* FERPA
22 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Hope of DetroitAcademy
It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-12
1999
2009-2014
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82957
Grades Served AddressK-12 4443 N. Campbell Street
Detroit, MI 48210
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderAli Abdel
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Hope of Detroit Academy
It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.
The Leona Group
65 59 60 57 52 59 60 54 56 28 7 6 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
446 449482 505 496 496 488 510 523
572
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82957
Grades Served AddressK-12 4443 N. Campbell Street
Detroit, MI 48210
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderAli Abdel
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Hope of Detroit Academy
It is the mission of Hope of Detroit Academy to promote a multi-cultural community of learners who are college bound and strive for excellence, determination, and achievement.
The Leona Group
65 59 60 57 52 59 60 54 56 28 7 6 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
446 449482 505 496 496 488 510 523
572
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Hope of Detroit Academy (K-8)4443 Campbell, Detroit, MI 48210
Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210
SCHOOL LEADER: Ali Abdel
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.5% 35.3% -0.8% 40.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 49.0% 51.9% -2.9% 38.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.5% 49.1% -14.6% 43.1% 70.4%
Reading 6 58.6% 44.6% 14.0% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 50.9% 37.5% 13.4% 31.6% 62.0%
Reading 8 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**
Math 3 21.8% 15.7% 6.1% 14.6% 40.9%
Math 4 17.6% 14.8% 2.8% 16.6% 44.9%
Math 5 27.6% 25.0% 2.6% 16.2% 45.7%
Math 6 23.7% 8.9% 14.8% 12.5% 40.2%
Math 7 20.4% 12.5% 7.9% 12.3% 38.4%
Math 8 5.5% 15.6% -10.1% 9.8% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%3.6**
12.4% Special Education
87.6% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.2% Free
4.2% Reduced
6.6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
75.8% ELL Student Pop.
24.2% General Education
Hope of Detroit Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Hope of Detroit Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 558 96.4%River Rouge, School District of the City of 6 1.0%Allen Park Public Schools 3 0.5%Dearborn Heights School District #7 3 0.5%East Detroit Public Schools 2 0.3%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.3%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 2 0.3%School District of the City of Inkster 1 0.2%Taylor School District 1 0.2%Waterford School District 1 0.2%
Total Number of Districts: 10
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.5% 35.3% -0.8% 40.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 49.0% 51.9% -2.9% 38.0% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.5% 49.1% -14.6% 43.1% 70.4%
Reading 6 58.6% 44.6% 14.0% 43.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 50.9% 37.5% 13.4% 31.6% 62.0%
Reading 8 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% 43.2% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%1.03**
Math 3 21.8% 15.7% 6.1% 14.6% 40.9%
Math 4 17.6% 14.8% 2.8% 16.6% 44.9%
Math 5 27.6% 25.0% 2.6% 16.2% 45.7%
Math 6 23.7% 8.9% 14.8% 12.5% 40.2%
Math 7 20.4% 12.5% 7.9% 12.3% 38.4%
Math 8 5.5% 15.6% -10.1% 9.8% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%3.6**
12.4% Special Education
87.6% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.2% Free
4.2% Reduced
6.6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
75.8% ELL Student Pop.
24.2% General Education
Hope of Detroit Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope of Detroit Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2142
2247
2498
2620
2802
2816
2898
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2177
2214
2410
2444
2538
2598
2628
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
20%
24%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
16%
17%
2010-2011
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope of Detroit Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2142
2247
2498
2620
2802
2816
2898
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2177
2214
2410
2444
2538
2598
2628
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
20%
24%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
16%
17%
2010-2011
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope of Detroit Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2142
2247
2498
2620
2802
2816
2898
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2177
2214
2410
2444
2538
2598
2628
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
20%
24%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
16%
17%
2010-2011
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Hope of Detroit Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2142
2247
2498
2620
2802
2816
2898
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2177
2214
2410
2444
2538
2598
2628
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
20%
24%
2010-2011
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
16%
17%
2010-2011
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2011-2012
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Hope of Detroit Academy
African-American 15%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 82%
Caucasian 1%
Native American 0%
Other 2%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
*FERPA
TARGET = 21
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 23
Huron Academy
Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
CS Partners
K-6
1999
2011-2016
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50903
Grades Served AddressK-6 11401 Metro Parkway
Sterling Heights, MI 48312
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management School LeaderMark Talbot
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Huron Academy
Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.
CS Partners
85 76 95 93 76 47 60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
486 479 458485
408 431 428
526 542 532
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-50903
Grades Served AddressK-6 11401 Metro Parkway
Sterling Heights, MI 48312
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management School LeaderMark Talbot
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Huron Academy
Huron Academy’s mission is to be a leader in the areas of academic excellence and safety, while developing the character of our students.
CS Partners
85 76 95 93 76 47 60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
486 479 458485
408 431 428
526 542 532
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
11401 Metro ParkwaySterling Heights, MI 48312
SCHOOL LEADER: Mark Talbot
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 64.3% 50.6% 13.7% 65.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 69.4% 67.9% 1.5% 65.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 57.4% 70.3% -12.9% 68.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 80.4% 69.4% 11.0% 66.0% 68.2%
Math 3 33.0% 23.4% 9.6% 40.1% 40.9%
Math 4 52.1% 46.2% 5.9% 43.1% 44.9%
Math 5 37.8% 41.9% -4.1% 44.5% 45.7%
Math 6 60.7% 16.3% 44.4% 39.2% 40.2%
10.9% Special Education
89.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
42.9% Free
6.8% Reduced
50.4% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
27.3% ELL Student Pop.
72.7% General Education
Huron Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Huron Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Utica Community Schools 179 33.6%Warren Consolidated Schools 179 33.6%Chippewa Valley Schools 41 7.7%Clintondale Community Schools 22 4.1%Fitzgerald Public Schools 13 2.4%Roseville Community Schools 12 2.3%East Detroit Public Schools 11 2.1%Troy School District 11 2.1%Detroit City School District 10 1.9%Fraser Public Schools 8 1.5%Center Line Public Schools 7 1.3%Romeo Community Schools 7 1.3%Van Dyke Public Schools 7 1.3%L'Anse Creuse Public Schools 5 0.9%Mount Clemens Community School District 4 0.8%Lamphere Public Schools 3 0.6%Madison District Public Schools 3 0.6%Ferndale Public Schools 2 0.4%Lakeview Public Schools (Macomb) 2 0.4%Other 6 1.1%
Total Number of Districts: 24
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:13 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 64.3% 50.6% 13.7% 65.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 69.4% 67.9% 1.5% 65.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 57.4% 70.3% -12.9% 68.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 80.4% 69.4% 11.0% 66.0% 68.2%
Math 3 33.0% 23.4% 9.6% 40.1% 40.9%
Math 4 52.1% 46.2% 5.9% 43.1% 44.9%
Math 5 37.8% 41.9% -4.1% 44.5% 45.7%
Math 6 60.7% 16.3% 44.4% 39.2% 40.2%
10.9% Special Education
89.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
42.9% Free
6.8% Reduced
50.4% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
27.3% ELL Student Pop.
72.7% General Education
Huron Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Huron Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2287
2483
2646
2822
2883
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2157
2350
2531
2592
2664
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
51%
48%
2010-2011
49% Students Did Not Meet Target
51% Students Met Target
2011-2012
52% Students Did Not Meet Target
48% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
57%
42%
2010-2011
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2011-2012
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Huron Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2287
2483
2646
2822
2883
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2157
2350
2531
2592
2664
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
51%
48%
2010-2011
49% Students Did Not Meet Target
51% Students Met Target
2011-2012
52% Students Did Not Meet Target
48% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
57%
42%
2010-2011
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2011-2012
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Huron Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2287
2483
2646
2822
2883
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2157
2350
2531
2592
2664
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
51%
48%
2010-2011
49% Students Did Not Meet Target
51% Students Met Target
2011-2012
52% Students Did Not Meet Target
48% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
57%
42%
2010-2011
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2011-2012
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Huron Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2287
2483
2646
2822
2883
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2157
2350
2531
2592
2664
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
51%
48%
2010-2011
49% Students Did Not Meet Target
51% Students Met Target
2011-2012
52% Students Did Not Meet Target
48% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
57%
42%
2010-2011
43% Students Did Not Meet Target
57% Students Met Target
2011-2012
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Huron Academy
African-American 19%
Asian 12%
Hispanic 5%
Caucasian 60%
Native American 0%
Other 4%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
24 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Joy Preparatory Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-8
1999
2011-2016
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82958
Grades Served AddressK-8 1129 Oakman Boulevard
Detroit, MI 48238
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management School LeadersNichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Joy Preparatory Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.
The Leona Group
52 48 40 53 39 46 48 33 35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
297
377
456 476 455424
464435
370394
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-82958
Grades Served AddressK-8 1129 Oakman Boulevard
Detroit, MI 48238
Charter Contract2011-2016
Management School LeadersNichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Joy Preparatory Academy
Joy Preparatory Academy will educate children safely, vigorously and competitively creating success in a global society.
The Leona Group
52 48 40 53 39 46 48 33 35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
297
377
456 476 455424
464435
370394
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Joy Preparatory Academy (PreK-2)1129 Oakman, Detroit, MI 48238
Joy Preparatory Academy (3-8)15055 Dexter, Detroit, MI
SCHOOL LEADERS: Nichole McAfee, Fran Gardulescu
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 30.2% 48.5% -18.3% 40.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 35.9% 38.5% -2.6% 37.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 40.0% 48.9% -8.9% 42.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 54.2% 42.9% 11.3% 42.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 25.8% 45.0% -19.2% 31.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 36.1% 38.1% -2.0% 43.0% 65.7%
Math 3 5.8% 18.2% -12.4% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 13.2% 0.0% 13.2% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 13.6% 2.2% 11.4% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 17.0% 5.7% 11.3% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 3.2% 7.5% -4.3% 12.1% 38.4%
Math 8 11.4% 0.0% 11.4% 9.6% 32.5%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
93.1% Free
2.8% Reduced
4.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Joy Preparatory Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Joy Preparatory Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 391 99.2%Highland Park City Schools 2 0.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 1 0.3%
Total Number of Districts: 3
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 30.2% 48.5% -18.3% 40.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 35.9% 38.5% -2.6% 37.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 40.0% 48.9% -8.9% 42.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 54.2% 42.9% 11.3% 42.8% 68.2%
Reading 7 25.8% 45.0% -19.2% 31.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 36.1% 38.1% -2.0% 43.0% 65.7%
Math 3 5.8% 18.2% -12.4% 14.4% 40.9%
Math 4 13.2% 0.0% 13.2% 16.3% 44.9%
Math 5 13.6% 2.2% 11.4% 16.0% 45.7%
Math 6 17.0% 5.7% 11.3% 12.2% 40.2%
Math 7 3.2% 7.5% -4.3% 12.1% 38.4%
Math 8 11.4% 0.0% 11.4% 9.6% 32.5%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
93.1% Free
2.8% Reduced
4.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Joy Preparatory Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Joy Preparatory Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2211
2285
2684
2561
2825
2803
2889
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2142
2166
2441
2394
2536
2541
2615
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
29%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
71% Students Did Not Meet Target
29% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
10%
15%
2010-2011
90% Students Did Not Meet Target
10% Students Met Target
2011-2012
85% Students Did Not Meet Target
15% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Joy Preparatory Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2211
2285
2684
2561
2825
2803
2889
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2142
2166
2441
2394
2536
2541
2615
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
29%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
71% Students Did Not Meet Target
29% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
10%
15%
2010-2011
90% Students Did Not Meet Target
10% Students Met Target
2011-2012
85% Students Did Not Meet Target
15% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Joy Preparatory Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2211
2285
2684
2561
2825
2803
2889
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2142
2166
2441
2394
2536
2541
2615
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
29%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
71% Students Did Not Meet Target
29% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
10%
15%
2010-2011
90% Students Did Not Meet Target
10% Students Met Target
2011-2012
85% Students Did Not Meet Target
15% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Joy Preparatory Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2211
2285
2684
2561
2825
2803
2889
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2142
2166
2441
2394
2536
2541
2615
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
24%
29%
2010-2011
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2011-2012
71% Students Did Not Meet Target
29% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
10%
15%
2010-2011
90% Students Did Not Meet Target
10% Students Met Target
2011-2012
85% Students Did Not Meet Target
15% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Joy Preparatory Academy
African-American 98%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 0%
Caucasian 1%
Native American 0%
Other 1%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 25
Lighthouse Academy (SDA)
Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
K-12
2008
2013-2018
Year Opened District Code2008 2012-2013_MI-41922
Grades Served AddressK-12 3330 36th Street SE
Kentwood, MI 49508
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Lighthouse Academy
Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
1 2 3 8 11 16 34 74 79 44 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1st 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
86
166187
210
302
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2008 2012-2013_MI-41922
Grades Served AddressK-12 3330 36th Street SE
Kentwood, MI 49508
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management SuperintendentHeidi Cate
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Lighthouse Academy
Creating hope through academic success in spite of life's storms.
Integrity Educational Services of Grand Rapids
1 2 3 8 11 16 34 74 79 44 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1st 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
86
166187
210
302
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
The Haven (9-12)1565 Cedar NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Lighthouse North (9-12)1260 Ekhart St NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
St. John’s2355 Knapp St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49505
SCHOOL LEADER: Heidi Cate
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 %5.66%9.75**
Reading 4 %1.86%3.16**
Reading 5 %4.07%2.26**
Reading 6 %2.86%8.95**
Reading 7 %0.26%7.74*%3.41
Reading 8 24.1% 28.6% -4.5% 57.1% 65.7%
Reading 11 20.0% 25.9% -5.9% 41.9% 53.5%
Math 3 %9.04%5.03**
Math 4 %9.44%3.53**
Math 5 %7.54%1.53**
Math 6 %2.04%9.92**
Math 7 %4.83%9.22*%0.0
Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% 32.5%
Math 11 0.0% 7.4% -7.4% 18.7% 28.6%
30.9% Special Education
69.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.1% Free
1% Reduced
9.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0.3% ELL Student Pop.
99.7% General Education
Lighthouse Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Lighthouse Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Grand Rapids Public Schools 153 49.8%Kentwood Public Schools 108 35.2%Forest Hills Public Schools 9 2.9%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 9 2.9%Wyoming Public Schools 7 2.3%Kelloggsville Public Schools 3 1.0%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 3 1.0%Byron Center Public Schools 2 0.7%Grandville Public Schools 2 0.7%Lowell Area Schools 2 0.7%Rockford Public Schools 2 0.7%Sparta Area Schools 2 0.7%Cedar Springs Public Schools 1 0.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 1 0.3%Godwin Heights Public Schools 1 0.3%Thornapple Kellogg School District 1 0.3%Wayland Union Schools 1 0.3%
Total Number of Districts: 17
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 %5.66%9.75**
Reading 4 %1.86%3.16**
Reading 5 %4.07%2.26**
Reading 6 %2.86%8.95**
Reading 7 %0.26%7.74*%3.41
Reading 8 24.1% 28.6% -4.5% 57.1% 65.7%
Reading 11 20.0% 25.9% -5.9% 41.9% 53.5%
Math 3 %9.04%5.03**
Math 4 %9.44%3.53**
Math 5 %7.54%1.53**
Math 6 %2.04%9.92**
Math 7 %4.83%9.22*%0.0
Math 8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.9% 32.5%
Math 11 0.0% 7.4% -7.4% 18.7% 28.6%
30.9% Special Education
69.1% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.1% Free
1% Reduced
9.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0.3% ELL Student Pop.
99.7% General Education
Lighthouse Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Lighthouse Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
25%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
0%
0%
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Lighthouse Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
25%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
0%
0%
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Lighthouse Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
25%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
0%
0%
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Lighthouse Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
25%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
0%
0%
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Lighthouse Academy
African-American 50%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 14%
Caucasian 30%
Native American 1%
Other 5%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
15.1TARGET = 21
Lighthouse Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Grand Rapids Public Schools 153 49.8%Kentwood Public Schools 108 35.2%Forest Hills Public Schools 9 2.9%Godfrey-Lee Public Schools 9 2.9%Wyoming Public Schools 7 2.3%Kelloggsville Public Schools 3 1.0%Kenowa Hills Public Schools 3 1.0%Byron Center Public Schools 2 0.7%Grandville Public Schools 2 0.7%Lowell Area Schools 2 0.7%Rockford Public Schools 2 0.7%Sparta Area Schools 2 0.7%Cedar Springs Public Schools 1 0.3%Comstock Park Public Schools 1 0.3%Godwin Heights Public Schools 1 0.3%Thornapple Kellogg School District 1 0.3%Wayland Union Schools 1 0.3%
Total Number of Districts: 17
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
Lighthouse Academy (K-12)3330 36th St, Kentwood, MI 49508
Waalkes School (9-12)701 Ball Ave. NE, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
* FERPA
26 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Marshall Academy
As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
MJ Management Services, Inc.
K-12
2000
2010-2015
Year Opened District Code2000 2012-2013_MI-13903
Grades Served AddressK-12 18203 Homer Road
Marshall, MI 49068
Charter Contract2010-2015
Management HeadmasterBrent Swan
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Marshall Academy
As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.
MJ Management Services, Inc.
25 18 20 19 20 20 17 19 20 26 17 16 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
244224 215 214
184
226
263 269 273244
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2000 2012-2013_MI-13903
Grades Served AddressK-12 18203 Homer Road
Marshall, MI 49068
Charter Contract2010-2015
Management HeadmasterBrent Swan
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Marshall Academy
As members of the Marshall Academy community, we pledge our best efforts to create and maintain a disciplined learning environment based upon traditional moral values, while assuring mastery of the classic fundamentals of learning and challenging our students to excel in their given talents.
MJ Management Services, Inc.
25 18 20 19 20 20 17 19 20 26 17 16 7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
244224 215 214
184
226
263 269 273244
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
18203 Homer RoadMarshall, MI 49068
SCHOOL LEADER: Brent Swan
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 61.1% 38.1% 23.0% 62.7% 66.5%
Reading 4 66.7% 57.9% 8.8% 70.2% 68.1%
Reading 5 55.6% 65.0% -9.4% 63.3% 70.4%
Reading 6 68.8% 55.0% 13.8% 66.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 83.3% 75.0% 8.3% 53.8% 62.0%
Reading 8 68.4% 60.0% 8.4% 57.4% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%6.05*%3.35
Math 3 38.9% 14.3% 24.6% 41.6% 40.9%
Math 4 44.4% 50.0% -5.6% 48.4% 44.9%
Math 5 72.2% 15.0% 57.2% 47.5% 45.7%
Math 6 26.7% 21.1% 5.6% 43.7% 40.2%
Math 7 50.0% 54.2% -4.2% 34.8% 38.4%
Math 8 47.4% 20.0% 27.4% 26.6% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%2.62*%3.31
11.5% Special Education
88.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
22.1% Free
0% Reduced
77.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Marshall Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Marshall Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%
Total Number of Districts: 15
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 61.1% 38.1% 23.0% 62.7% 66.5%
Reading 4 66.7% 57.9% 8.8% 70.2% 68.1%
Reading 5 55.6% 65.0% -9.4% 63.3% 70.4%
Reading 6 68.8% 55.0% 13.8% 66.0% 68.2%
Reading 7 83.3% 75.0% 8.3% 53.8% 62.0%
Reading 8 68.4% 60.0% 8.4% 57.4% 65.7%
Reading 11 %5.35%6.05*%3.35
Math 3 38.9% 14.3% 24.6% 41.6% 40.9%
Math 4 44.4% 50.0% -5.6% 48.4% 44.9%
Math 5 72.2% 15.0% 57.2% 47.5% 45.7%
Math 6 26.7% 21.1% 5.6% 43.7% 40.2%
Math 7 50.0% 54.2% -4.2% 34.8% 38.4%
Math 8 47.4% 20.0% 27.4% 26.6% 32.5%
Math 11 %6.82%2.62*%3.31
11.5% Special Education
88.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
22.1% Free
0% Reduced
77.9% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Marshall Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Marshall Academy
African-American 2%
Asian 1%
Hispanic 12%
Caucasian 83%
Native American 0%
Other 2%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
17.9TARGET = 21
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Marshall Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2319
2545
2561
2734
2833
3025
3119
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2191
2474
2468
2620
2669
2943
2992
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
49%
54%
2010-2011
51% Students Did Not Meet Target
49% Students Met Target
2011-2012
46% Students Did Not Meet Target
54% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
60%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
40% Students Did Not Meet Target
60% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Marshall Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2319
2545
2561
2734
2833
3025
3119
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2191
2474
2468
2620
2669
2943
2992
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
49%
54%
2010-2011
51% Students Did Not Meet Target
49% Students Met Target
2011-2012
46% Students Did Not Meet Target
54% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
60%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
40% Students Did Not Meet Target
60% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Marshall Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2319
2545
2561
2734
2833
3025
3119
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2191
2474
2468
2620
2669
2943
2992
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
49%
54%
2010-2011
51% Students Did Not Meet Target
49% Students Met Target
2011-2012
46% Students Did Not Meet Target
54% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
60%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
40% Students Did Not Meet Target
60% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Marshall Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2319
2545
2561
2734
2833
3025
3119
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2191
2474
2468
2620
2669
2943
2992
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
49%
54%
2010-2011
51% Students Did Not Meet Target
49% Students Met Target
2011-2012
46% Students Did Not Meet Target
54% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
60%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
40% Students Did Not Meet Target
60% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Marshall Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%
Total Number of Districts: 15
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
Marshall Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Marshall Public Schools 104 42.6%Albion Public Schools 80 32.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 19 7.8%Homer Community School District 13 5.3%Charlotte Public Schools 6 2.5%Harper Creek Community Schools 6 2.5%Athens Area Schools 4 1.6%Tekonsha Community Schools 4 1.6%Springport Public Schools 2 0.8%Climax-Scotts Community Schools 1 0.4%Gull Lake Community Schools 1 0.4%Kalamazoo Public Schools 1 0.4%Northwest Community Schools 1 0.4%Pennfield Schools 1 0.4%Tecumseh Public Schools 1 0.4%
Total Number of Districts: 15
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
* FERPA
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 27
Michigan ConnectionsAcademy (Cyber)
Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards. We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
Connections Academy
K-12
2010
2013-2018
Year Opened District Code2010 2012-2013_MI-33911
Grades Served AddressK-12 2140 University Park Drive
Okemos, MI 48864
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management Superintendent/PrincipalBryan Klochack
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Michigan Connections Academy
Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards. We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.
Connections Academy
33 39 59 59 56 72 80 75 86 62 105
44 45
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
375
663
815
0100
200
300
400500
600
700
800900
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code2010 2012-2013_MI-33911
Grades Served AddressK-12 2140 University Park Drive
Okemos, MI 48864
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management Superintendent/PrincipalBryan Klochack
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Michigan Connections Academy
Our mission is to help each student maximize his or her potential and meet the highest performance standards. We are a high-quality, high-tech, high-touch “school without walls” that brings out the best in every student.
Connections Academy
33 39 59 59 56 72 80 75 86 62 105
44 45
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
375
663
815
0100
200
300
400500
600
700
800900
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
2140 University Park DriveOkemos, MI 48864
SCHOOL LEADER: Bryan Klochack
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 63.6% 64.4% -0.8% 59.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 80.4% 82.2% -1.8% 60.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 61.6% 77.8% -16.2% 63.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 75.0% 83.3% -8.3% 61.7% 68.2%
Reading 7 63.5% 59.6% 3.9% 54.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 73.2% 56.9% 16.3% 58.9% 65.7%
Reading 11 52.0% 37.0% 15.0% 45.8% 53.5%
Math 3 34.5% 42.2% -7.7% 33.5% 40.9%
Math 4 48.2% 37.8% 10.4% 37.5% 44.9%
Math 5 43.8% 33.3% 10.5% 37.4% 45.7%
Math 6 23.7% 19.0% 4.7% 32.0% 40.2%
Math 7 31.1% 36.2% -5.1% 30.5% 38.4%
Math 8 17.1% 7.8% 9.3% 25.1% 32.5%
Math 11 29.2% 19.2% 10.0% 21.0% 28.6%
10.5% Special Education
89.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
49.8% Free
11.4% Reduced
38.8% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Michigan Connections Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.
Michigan Connections Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 154 18.7%Lansing Public School District 19 2.3%Plymouth-Canton Community Schools 13 1.6%Bendle Public Schools 12 1.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 12 1.5%Port Huron Area School District 10 1.2%Utica Community Schools 10 1.2%Flint, School District of the City of 9 1.1%Brandon School District in the Counties of Oakland 8 1.0%Coldwater Community Schools 8 1.0%Holland City School District 8 1.0%Ann Arbor Public Schools 7 0.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 7 0.8%Chelsea School District 7 0.8%Kalamazoo Public Schools 7 0.8%Livonia Public Schools School District 7 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 7 0.8%Stockbridge Community Schools 7 0.8%Dearborn Heights School District #7 6 0.7%Other 507 61.5%
Total Number of Districts: 245
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 63.6% 64.4% -0.8% 59.5% 66.5%
Reading 4 80.4% 82.2% -1.8% 60.8% 68.1%
Reading 5 61.6% 77.8% -16.2% 63.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 75.0% 83.3% -8.3% 61.7% 68.2%
Reading 7 63.5% 59.6% 3.9% 54.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 73.2% 56.9% 16.3% 58.9% 65.7%
Reading 11 52.0% 37.0% 15.0% 45.8% 53.5%
Math 3 34.5% 42.2% -7.7% 33.5% 40.9%
Math 4 48.2% 37.8% 10.4% 37.5% 44.9%
Math 5 43.8% 33.3% 10.5% 37.4% 45.7%
Math 6 23.7% 19.0% 4.7% 32.0% 40.2%
Math 7 31.1% 36.2% -5.1% 30.5% 38.4%
Math 8 17.1% 7.8% 9.3% 25.1% 32.5%
Math 11 29.2% 19.2% 10.0% 21.0% 28.6%
10.5% Special Education
89.5% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
49.8% Free
11.4% Reduced
38.8% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Michigan Connections Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Michigan Connections Academy
African-American 29%
Asian 3%
Hispanic 4%
Caucasian 59%
Native American 0%
Other 5%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
20.8TARGET = 21
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Michigan Connections Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Michigan Connections Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Michigan Connections Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Michigan Connections Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
NA
0%
NA
2010-2011
100% Students Did Not Meet Target
0% Students Met Target
2011-2012
2012-2013
No Data Available
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Michigan Connections Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 154 18.7%Lansing Public School District 19 2.3%Plymouth-Canton Community Schools 13 1.6%Bendle Public Schools 12 1.5%Wayne-Westland Community School District 12 1.5%Port Huron Area School District 10 1.2%Utica Community Schools 10 1.2%Flint, School District of the City of 9 1.1%Brandon School District in the Counties of Oakland 8 1.0%Coldwater Community Schools 8 1.0%Holland City School District 8 1.0%Ann Arbor Public Schools 7 0.8%Battle Creek Public Schools 7 0.8%Chelsea School District 7 0.8%Kalamazoo Public Schools 7 0.8%Livonia Public Schools School District 7 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 7 0.8%Stockbridge Community Schools 7 0.8%Dearborn Heights School District #7 6 0.7%Other 507 61.5%
Total Number of Districts: 245
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
28 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
New Bedford Academy
New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
MJ Management Services, Inc.
K-8
1998
2013-2018
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-58901
Grades Served AddressK-8 6315 Secor
Lambertville, MI 48144
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management School LeaderGreg Sauter
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
New Bedford Academy
New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.
MJ Management Services, Inc.
21 25 19 15 16 11 16 16 20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
121
146166 162
144 141 139150
168 159
020
40
60
80100
120
140
160180
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-58901
Grades Served AddressK-8 6315 Secor
Lambertville, MI 48144
Charter Contract2013-2018
Management School LeaderGreg Sauter
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
New Bedford Academy
New Bedford Academy is a fully accredited public school providing quality education through ability based instruction in a safe and caring environment.
MJ Management Services, Inc.
21 25 19 15 16 11 16 16 20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
121
146166 162
144 141 139150
168 159
020
40
60
80100
120
140
160180
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
6315 SecorLambertville, MI 48144
SCHOOL LEADER: Greg Sauter
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 66.7% 50.0% 16.7% 80.6% 66.5%
Reading 4 62.5% 71.4% -8.9% 79.3% 68.1%
Reading 5 81.8% 84.2% -2.4% 79.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 80.0% 94.1% -14.1% 77.1% 68.2%
Reading 7 66.7% 55.0% 11.7% 72.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 70.0% 42.9% 27.1% 73.6% 65.7%
Math 3 26.7% 37.5% -10.8% 49.6% 40.9%
Math 4 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 56.3% 44.9%
Math 5 54.5% 31.6% 22.9% 56.9% 45.7%
Math 6 40.0% 23.5% 16.5% 42.3% 40.2%
Math 7 13.3% 30.0% -16.7% 50.6% 38.4%
Math 8 25.0% 14.3% 10.7% 41.7% 32.5%
6.3% Special Education
93.7% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
25.8% Free
7.5% Reduced
66.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
New Bedford Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.New Bedford Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Bedford Public Schools 121 76.1%Mason Consolidated Schools (Monroe) 24 15.1%Dundee Community Schools 5 3.1%Coldwater Community Schools 4 2.5%Ida Public School District 2 1.3%Blissfield Community Schools 1 0.6%Monroe Public Schools 1 0.6%Whiteford Agricultural School District of the Coun 1 0.6%
Total Number of Districts: 8
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:14 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 66.7% 50.0% 16.7% 80.6% 66.5%
Reading 4 62.5% 71.4% -8.9% 79.3% 68.1%
Reading 5 81.8% 84.2% -2.4% 79.5% 70.4%
Reading 6 80.0% 94.1% -14.1% 77.1% 68.2%
Reading 7 66.7% 55.0% 11.7% 72.9% 62.0%
Reading 8 70.0% 42.9% 27.1% 73.6% 65.7%
Math 3 26.7% 37.5% -10.8% 49.6% 40.9%
Math 4 25.0% 35.7% -10.7% 56.3% 44.9%
Math 5 54.5% 31.6% 22.9% 56.9% 45.7%
Math 6 40.0% 23.5% 16.5% 42.3% 40.2%
Math 7 13.3% 30.0% -16.7% 50.6% 38.4%
Math 8 25.0% 14.3% 10.7% 41.7% 32.5%
6.3% Special Education
93.7% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
25.8% Free
7.5% Reduced
66.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
New Bedford Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
New Bedford Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2046
2389
2608
3058
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2127
2471
2587
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
62%
53%
2010-2011
38% Students Did Not Meet Target
62% Students Met Target
2011-2012
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
52%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
48% Students Did Not Meet Target
52% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
New Bedford Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2046
2389
2608
3058
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2127
2471
2587
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
62%
53%
2010-2011
38% Students Did Not Meet Target
62% Students Met Target
2011-2012
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
52%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
48% Students Did Not Meet Target
52% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
New Bedford Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2046
2389
2608
3058
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2127
2471
2587
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
62%
53%
2010-2011
38% Students Did Not Meet Target
62% Students Met Target
2011-2012
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
52%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
48% Students Did Not Meet Target
52% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
New Bedford Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2046
2389
2608
3058
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2127
2471
2587
2819
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
62%
53%
2010-2011
38% Students Did Not Meet Target
62% Students Met Target
2011-2012
47% Students Did Not Meet Target
53% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
42%
52%
2010-2011
58% Students Did Not Meet Target
42% Students Met Target
2011-2012
48% Students Did Not Meet Target
52% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
New Bedford Academy
African-American 6%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 7%
Caucasian 87%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 29
Northridge Academy
Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring,and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to developwell educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-8
1999
2010-2015
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-25904
Grades Served AddressK-8 530 W. Pierson Road
Flint, MI 48505
Charter Contract2010-2015
Management School LeaderLatricia Brown-Coates
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Northridge Academy
Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring, and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to develop well-educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.
The Leona Group
28 29 34 31 25 25 39 28 25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
341319
348
267230
190
264293 276 264
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1999 2012-2013_MI-25904
Grades Served AddressK-8 530 W. Pierson Road
Flint, MI 48505
Charter Contract2010-2015
Management School LeaderLatricia Brown-Coates
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Northridge Academy
Northridge Academy provides exemplary learning experiences in a safe, caring, and respectful environment. The academy employs best practices to develop well-educated, compassionate students ready to succeed in a global society.
The Leona Group
28 29 34 31 25 25 39 28 25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
341319
348
267230
190
264293 276 264
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
530 W. Pierson RoadFlint, MI 48505
SCHOOL LEADER: Latricia Brown-Coates
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 60.6% 30.0% 30.6% 38.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 38.5% 39.3% -0.8% 36.5% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.6% 37.5% -2.9% 40.3% 70.4%
Reading 6 41.7% 22.9% 18.8% 41.3% 68.2%
Reading 7 46.2% 11.1% 35.1% 21.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 43.5% 20.9% 22.6% 27.6% 65.7%
Math 3 45.5% 6.7% 38.8% 17.2% 40.9%
Math 4 48.0% 3.6% 44.4% 16.4% 44.9%
Math 5 19.2% 16.7% 2.5% 18.7% 45.7%
Math 6 22.2% 5.7% 16.5% 17.2% 40.2%
Math 7 34.6% 2.8% 31.8% 9.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 2.3% 2.0% 4.5% 32.5%
8.2% Special Education
91.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
98.9% Free
0% Reduced
1.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Northridge Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Northridge Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Flint, School District of the City of 261 97.0%Beecher Community School District 7 2.6%Swartz Creek Community Schools 1 0.4%
Total Number of Districts: 3
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 60.6% 30.0% 30.6% 38.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 38.5% 39.3% -0.8% 36.5% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.6% 37.5% -2.9% 40.3% 70.4%
Reading 6 41.7% 22.9% 18.8% 41.3% 68.2%
Reading 7 46.2% 11.1% 35.1% 21.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 43.5% 20.9% 22.6% 27.6% 65.7%
Math 3 45.5% 6.7% 38.8% 17.2% 40.9%
Math 4 48.0% 3.6% 44.4% 16.4% 44.9%
Math 5 19.2% 16.7% 2.5% 18.7% 45.7%
Math 6 22.2% 5.7% 16.5% 17.2% 40.2%
Math 7 34.6% 2.8% 31.8% 9.5% 38.4%
Math 8 4.3% 2.3% 2.0% 4.5% 32.5%
8.2% Special Education
91.8% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
98.9% Free
0% Reduced
1.1% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Northridge Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Northridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2173
2378
2628
2673
2648
2848
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2402
2431
2489
2457
2628
2659
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
20%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
31%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
69% Students Did Not Meet Target
31% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Northridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2173
2378
2628
2673
2648
2848
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2402
2431
2489
2457
2628
2659
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
20%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
31%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
69% Students Did Not Meet Target
31% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Northridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2173
2378
2628
2673
2648
2848
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2402
2431
2489
2457
2628
2659
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
20%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
31%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
69% Students Did Not Meet Target
31% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Northridge Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2173
2378
2628
2673
2648
2848
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2402
2431
2489
2457
2628
2659
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
26%
20%
2010-2011
74% Students Did Not Meet Target
26% Students Met Target
2011-2012
80% Students Did Not Meet Target
20% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
21%
31%
2010-2011
79% Students Did Not Meet Target
21% Students Met Target
2011-2012
69% Students Did Not Meet Target
31% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Northridge Academy
African-American 98%
Asian 2%
Hispanic 0%
Caucasian 0%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
30 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, iscommitted to providing a safe, high quality educational program, which willmeet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels andwill promote high principles of character and citizenship.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-8
1998
2008-2013
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82939
Grades Served AddressK-8 2450 S. Beatrice
Detroit, MI 48217
Charter Contract2008-2013
Management School LeaderStephen Turk
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, is committed to providing a safe, high-quality educational program, which will meet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels and will promote high principles of character and citizenship.
The Leona Group
37 41 38 35 45 45 44 35 46
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
376 384359 365 377
403455
392 370 366
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82939
Grades Served AddressK-8 2450 S. Beatrice
Detroit, MI 48217
Charter Contract2008-2013
Management School LeaderStephen Turk
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Pierre Toussaint staff, working with parents and community members, is committed to providing a safe, high-quality educational program, which will meet the needs of all its students at their respective academic levels and will promote high principles of character and citizenship.
The Leona Group
37 41 38 35 45 45 44 35 46
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
376 384359 365 377
403455
392 370 366
050
100150200250300350400450500
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
2450 S. BeatriceDetroit, MI 48217
SCHOOL LEADER: Stephen Turk
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 16.7% 19.5% -2.8% 36.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 26.2% 32.0% -5.8% 36.3% 68.1%
Reading 5 31.1% 28.3% 2.8% 39.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 34.9% 30.0% 4.9% 40.2% 68.2%
Reading 7 22.9% 22.0% 0.9% 31.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 38.1% 48.6% -10.5% 40.0% 65.7%
Math 3 13.9% 11.9% 2.0% 15.3% 40.9%
Math 4 11.9% 14.0% -2.1% 14.9% 44.9%
Math 5 24.4% 10.6% 13.8% 12.7% 45.7%
Math 6 14.0% 7.5% 6.5% 11.1% 40.2%
Math 7 11.4% 10.0% 1.4% 10.5% 38.4%
Math 8 7.1% 2.9% 4.2% 8.6% 32.5%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92.6% Free
1.4% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Pierre Toussaint Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 210 56.5%River Rouge, School District of the City of 97 26.1%Ecorse Public Schools 44 11.8%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 9 2.4%Taylor School District 4 1.1%Dearborn City School District 3 0.8%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 2 0.5%Melvindale-North Allen Park Schools 1 0.3%School District of the City of Inkster 1 0.3%Woodhaven-Brownstown School District 1 0.3%
Total Number of Districts: 10
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 16.7% 19.5% -2.8% 36.3% 66.5%
Reading 4 26.2% 32.0% -5.8% 36.3% 68.1%
Reading 5 31.1% 28.3% 2.8% 39.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 34.9% 30.0% 4.9% 40.2% 68.2%
Reading 7 22.9% 22.0% 0.9% 31.1% 62.0%
Reading 8 38.1% 48.6% -10.5% 40.0% 65.7%
Math 3 13.9% 11.9% 2.0% 15.3% 40.9%
Math 4 11.9% 14.0% -2.1% 14.9% 44.9%
Math 5 24.4% 10.6% 13.8% 12.7% 45.7%
Math 6 14.0% 7.5% 6.5% 11.1% 40.2%
Math 7 11.4% 10.0% 1.4% 10.5% 38.4%
Math 8 7.1% 2.9% 4.2% 8.6% 32.5%
9.1% Special Education
90.9% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
92.6% Free
1.4% Reduced
6% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
0% ELL Student Pop.
100% General Education
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2090
2265
2409
2486
2612
2670
2786
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2063
2194
2373
2452
2495
2584
2569
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
23%
18%
2010-2011
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2011-2012
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
27%
14%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
86% Students Did Not Meet Target
14% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2090
2265
2409
2486
2612
2670
2786
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2063
2194
2373
2452
2495
2584
2569
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
23%
18%
2010-2011
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2011-2012
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
27%
14%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
86% Students Did Not Meet Target
14% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2090
2265
2409
2486
2612
2670
2786
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2063
2194
2373
2452
2495
2584
2569
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
23%
18%
2010-2011
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2011-2012
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
27%
14%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
86% Students Did Not Meet Target
14% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Pierre Toussaint Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2090
2265
2409
2486
2612
2670
2786
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2063
2194
2373
2452
2495
2584
2569
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
23%
18%
2010-2011
77% Students Did Not Meet Target
23% Students Met Target
2011-2012
82% Students Did Not Meet Target
18% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
27%
14%
2010-2011
73% Students Did Not Meet Target
27% Students Met Target
2011-2012
86% Students Did Not Meet Target
14% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Pierre Toussaint Academy
African-American 99%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 1%
Caucasian 0%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2012-2013 ANNUAL REPORT 31
Voyageur Academy
Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus,and continuous hard work.
GRADES SERVED:
YEAR OPENED:
CURRENT CONTRACT TERM:
MISSION STATEMENT:
OPERATIONAL STATUS:
ENROLLMENT BY YEAR:
STUDENTS BY GRADE:
MEAP ACHIEVEMENT (% Proficient):
ETHNICITY:
The Leona Group
K-12
1998
2009-2014
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82940
Grades Served AddressK-12 4321 N. Military
Detroit, MI 48210
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderRod Atkins
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Voyageur Academy
Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus, and continuous hard work.
The Leona Group
66 57 49 83 58 61 66 89 60 104
109
111
95
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
570656 707 752 746 786 797 822 834
1,008
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Year Opened District Code1998 2012-2013_MI-82940
Grades Served AddressK-12 4321 N. Military
Detroit, MI 48210
Charter Contract2009-2014
Management School LeaderRod Atkins
Mission Statement
Chart 2
Chart 3
Date Opened: FSU Chart 2 Enrollment by Year: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Grades Offered: FSU Chart 3 Enrollment by Grade: CEPI - Public Headcount Data
Contract Term: FSU
ESP: FSU
Mission Stmt: FSU
Demographics
Sources:
Number of Students in Each Grade
Enrollment by Year
Voyageur Academy
Voyageur Academy will create and enhance the educational foundation by providing Voyageur students with the drive and determination to achieve academic excellence through consistent discipline, intense focus, and continuous hard work.
The Leona Group
66 57 49 83 58 61 66 89 60 104
109
111
95
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th
570656 707 752 746 786 797 822 834
1,008
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
03-0
4
04-0
5
05-0
6
06-0
7
07-0
8
08-0
9
09-1
0
10-1
1
11-1
2
12-1
3
Voyageur Academy (K-8)4321 N. Military, Detroit, MI 48210
Consortium College Preparatory High School (9-12)4366 Military, Detroit, MI 48210
SCHOOL LEADER: Rod Atkins
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.9% 36.2% -1.3% 41.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 37.5% 37.7% -0.2% 38.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.4% 54.3% -19.9% 43.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 38.1% 40.0% -1.9% 43.6% 68.2%
Reading 7 28.7% 24.4% 4.3% 32.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 34.4% 25.0% 9.4% 43.7% 65.7%
Reading 11 19.4% 25.3% -5.9% 30.5% 53.5%
Math 3 9.5% 12.1% -2.6% 15.3% 40.9%
Math 4 19.3% 20.8% -1.5% 17.2% 44.9%
Math 5 24.6% 28.3% -3.7% 16.9% 45.7%
Math 6 28.6% 46.0% -17.4% 13.0% 40.2%
Math 7 11.5% 19.5% -8.0% 12.9% 38.4%
Math 8 8.2% 7.1% 1.1% 10.2% 32.5%
Math 11 1.0% 1.3% -0.3% 6.5% 28.6%
10% Special Education
90% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.3% Free
2% Reduced
8.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
1.4% ELL Student Pop.
98.6% General Education
Voyageur Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
FREE & REDUCED PRICE ELIGIBILITY
GENERAL & SPECIAL EDUCATION STATUS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL)
COMPOSITE RESIDENT(CRD): The CRD is a breakdown of the traditional public school districts students would be assigned to if they were not enrolled in this academy.Voyageur Academy 2012-2013
Students' Resident District
Number of Students from
Resident District
Percent of Students from
Resident District
Detroit City School District 962 94.2%South Redford School District 9 0.9%Huron Valley Schools 7 0.7%Southfield Public School District 7 0.7%Dearborn Heights School District #7 4 0.4%Lincoln Park, School District of the City of 4 0.4%Ecorse Public Schools 3 0.3%Redford Union Schools, District No. 1 3 0.3%River Rouge, School District of the City of 3 0.3%East Detroit Public Schools 2 0.2%School District of the City of Inkster 2 0.2%Wyandotte, School District of the City of 2 0.2%Other 13 1.3%
Total Number of Districts: 25
1) Source: Fall 2011 Michigan Student Data System
2) District residency is established via resident LEA number of the MSDS file
3) Percentage may not total 100% due to rounding
Chart_10_CRD Page 1 of 1 Printed: 7/24/2013 10:15 PM
SUBJECT/ GRADE 2012-2013 2011-2012 CHANGE
COMPOSITE RESIDENT DISTRICT STATE AVERAGE
Reading 3 34.9% 36.2% -1.3% 41.1% 66.5%
Reading 4 37.5% 37.7% -0.2% 38.7% 68.1%
Reading 5 34.4% 54.3% -19.9% 43.8% 70.4%
Reading 6 38.1% 40.0% -1.9% 43.6% 68.2%
Reading 7 28.7% 24.4% 4.3% 32.2% 62.0%
Reading 8 34.4% 25.0% 9.4% 43.7% 65.7%
Reading 11 19.4% 25.3% -5.9% 30.5% 53.5%
Math 3 9.5% 12.1% -2.6% 15.3% 40.9%
Math 4 19.3% 20.8% -1.5% 17.2% 44.9%
Math 5 24.6% 28.3% -3.7% 16.9% 45.7%
Math 6 28.6% 46.0% -17.4% 13.0% 40.2%
Math 7 11.5% 19.5% -8.0% 12.9% 38.4%
Math 8 8.2% 7.1% 1.1% 10.2% 32.5%
Math 11 1.0% 1.3% -0.3% 6.5% 28.6%
10% Special Education
90% General Education
Free and Reduced Price Lunch Eligibility2012-2013
General and Special Education Status2012-2013
89.3% Free
2% Reduced
8.7% Not-Eligible
English Language Learners (ELL)2012-2013
1.4% ELL Student Pop.
98.6% General Education
Voyageur Academy
Notes:1) Sources: Fall 2010 , 2011, 2012 MEAP - Public File; Fall 2012 MSDS - Unaudited; Spring 2012, 2013 MME; Fall 2012 CEPI Public FRL Data2) Compiled by: The Center for Charter Schools Central Michigan University
Updated: 8/14/2013 15:45:10 PM
Printed: 9/19/2013 11:06 AM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Voyageur Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2146
2380
2487
2630
2723
2657
2826
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2180
2270
2353
2430
2549
2566
2593
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
24%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
25%
16%
2010-2011
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
PERFORMANCESERIES RESULTS:
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Voyageur Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2146
2380
2487
2630
2723
2657
2826
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2180
2270
2353
2430
2549
2566
2593
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
24%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
25%
16%
2010-2011
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
READING2012-2013
Percent of students enrolled 3 or more years who meet the targets in grades 3 through 8
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Voyageur Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2146
2380
2487
2630
2723
2657
2826
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2180
2270
2353
2430
2549
2566
2593
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
24%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
25%
16%
2010-2011
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
Proof Point 5A - PS Achievement
Voyageur Academy
Chart 9 and 10 PS Pro ciencyCreated: 4/28/2011 3:32:42 PMUpdated: 6/7/2013 1:29:14 PM
Performance Series Spring ResultsSTUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE1 OR MORE YEARS, AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
2146
2380
2487
2630
2723
2657
2826
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Reading
GRADE
2180
2270
2353
2430
2549
2566
2593
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2900
3100
3300
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Sca
led
Sco
re
Spring 2011-2012 Spring 2012-2013 Achievement Targets
Math
GRADE
NA
17%
24%
2010-2011
83% Students Did Not Meet Target
17% Students Met Target
2011-2012
76% Students Did Not Meet Target
24% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
NA
25%
16%
2010-2011
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
25% Students Met Target
2011-2012
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
16% Students Met Target
2012-2013
No Data Available
Charts (PS) Printed: 9/19/2013 12:19 PM
MATH2012-2013
Voyageur Academy
African-American 80%
Asian 0%
Hispanic 18%
Caucasian 2%
Native American 0%
Other 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
ACT RESULTS:
COMPOSITE SCORE2012-2013
15.2TARGET = 21