maintenance organisation exposition compliance checklist ... · maintenance organisation exposition...

DR

AFT

DASR 145 MOE Checklist (DASR145 edition 1.0) of 54

MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION EXPOSITION COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST FOR DASR 145 APPROVED ORGANISATIONS

Part 1—MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION DATA Name of the Approved Organisation

Approval Reference

Contact Name and Position in the Organisation

First Approval Date

Part 2—MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION EXPOSITION INFORMATION Document Reference

Issue Number

Revision/Amendment Number

Date of Revision

Reason For Revision (NOTE 1: Document reference is the document reference code used within the company; it should be stated in the MOE)

Part 3—RESPONSIBLE PERSONS Name of Accountable Manager Holding Form 4

Name of Quality Manager Holding Form 4

Name of Maintenance Manager Holding Form 4

Name of Line Maintenance Manager Holding Form 4

Name of Shops Manager Holding Form 4 (NOTE 1: Name and positions of the post holders should be cross checked with the information stated in MOE)

(NOTE 2: Please either tick () the box if satisfied or cross () the box if not satisfied)

DR

AFT


Part 4—ATTACHED DOCUMENTS Presence Form # and Revision #

(If separate document) Compliance Remarks

(Check also the cross reference in MOE)

Form 2

Form 3

Scope of Work

Certification Specification List

Support Staff List

Contracted Maintenance Organisations List

Capability List

Contracted Operators List

Line station List

Subcontractor List

(NOTE 1: Please either tick () the box if satisfied or cross () the box if not satisfied) (NOTE 2: Check the compliance, if there is a non-compliance, state in the remarks)

DR

AFT


Part 5—MOE COVER PAGE Content MOE

Ref. Additional items to be

reviewed Documented Conformity Comments

Cover page should specify:

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

Part 145 Maintenance Organisation Exposition

The name of the organisation (defined on the DASR Form 3)

The address, telephone, fax numbers and email address of the Head Office

The copy number from the distribution list

The approval reference of the PART 145 organisation

Each page of the MOE should cover: This information may be added in header or footer

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

the name of the organisation

the issue number of the MOE

the amendment/revision number of the MOE

the date of the revision (dd/mmm/yyyy)

the chapter of the revision

the page number

the name of the document ‘Maintenance Organisation Exposition’

Check the approval of the previous revision: Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

DR

AFT


Part 6—MOE Part 0 INTRODUCTION Content MOE



Foreword Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

0.1—Table of Content MOE 0.1

Where a Part is not used it should be shown in the Exposition as ‘Not Applicable’

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

0.2—List of Effective Pages MOE 0.2

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

0.3—List of Issues/amendments or Record of Revision

MOE 0.3

This list of issue/amendments should allow traceability from the previously approved version

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Internal organisation approval page signed by the Maintenance Manager (MM), Quality Manager (QM) and Accountable Manager (AM) Internal approval statement Title, name, date and signature

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Revision highlights / Summary of changes This section should cover the previous revision information

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Effective date of the current revision The effective date is the date that the

amendment introduced in this amendment takes effect

The effective date can be established just prior to the final approval of the MOE by DGTA–ADF or just after. This is in order to obtain the necessary time to incorporate the amendment, eg to train personnel, print forms

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

DR

AFT


Part 6—MOE Part 0 INTRODUCTION Content MOE



0.4—Distribution list MOE 0.4

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

MOE copy number

Location of copies

Holders of copies

Format of copies (CD-ROM, Paper, EDP, etc)

Abbreviation, terminology and definitions Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

Cross reference list from the MOE to AMC DASR 145.A.70(a), if applicable

Yes No N/A

Yes No N/A

DR

AFT

Part 7—MOE Part 1—MANAGEMENT Content MOE




1.1 —Corporate Commitment by the AM When the AM is not the CEO of the

organisation then such CEO shall countersign the statement

Signed by AM Date Accountable Manager and (quote position) For and on behalf of (quote organisation

name)

MOE 1.1

DASR 145.A.30(a),(c),(e),(g) / AMC 145.A.30(a) - DASR 145.A.70(a) / AMC 145.A.70 (a), GM 145.A.70(a) - DASR 145.A.90 (a) Sample of statement is in GM DASR 145.A.70(a) that may be used. Any modification to the statement must not alter its intent. Should be re-signed for each AM changes and for each modification to the statement.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





1.2 —Quality and Safety Policy The Quality and Safety Policy should, as a minimum, include a statement committing the organisation to: Apply human factors principles Encourage personnel to report maintenance

related errors/incidents to meet Part-145 requirements

Recognise safety as a prime consideration in all activities at all times for all the staff within the organisation

Recognise that compliance with procedures, quality standards and regulations is the duty of all personnel

Recognise the need for all personnel to cooperate with the quality auditors

In addition the statement may commit to: Ensure that safety standards are not reduced

by commercial imperatives Ensure good use of resources and pay

particular attention to carry out correct maintenance at the first attempt

Train all organisation staff to be aware of human factors and set a continuous training programme in this field

MOE 1.2

DASR 145.A.30 (a) - DASR 145.A.65 (a) / AMC 145.A.65 (a) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 2 In addition to these ask for: Ensure that maintenance

procedures are kept current to reflect best practice within the organisation

Reporting of maintenance related errors/incidents is ‘penalty free” or “no blame’

Quality standards are the responsibility of all personnel and it is hence their duty to comply with this policy, to strive to both maintain and improve quality standards at every opportunity

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

1.3 —Management Personnel The titles and names of the senior persons mentioned in DASR 145.A.30(a), (b) and (c). DASR 145 functions may be subdivided under individual managers or combined in any number of ways, eg Base, Line and Workshop Managers under one ‘Maintenance Manager’ Accountable Manager Quality Manager Base maintenance Manager

MOE 1.3

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Line Maintenance Manager Workshop Maintenance Manager Responsible Level 3 for NDT (if applicable – D

rating) List who deputises for Maintenance Managers

in case of lengthy absence. Every nominated deputy should be able to demonstrate to DGTA–ADF similar level of qualification and experience. Issuance of deputy Form 4 is recommended

1.4—Duties and Responsibilities of Management Personnel

Accountable Manager Quality Manager Base Maintenance Manager Line Maintenance Manager Workshop Manager Responsible Level 3 for NDT (if applicable – D

rating) Other section manager as determined by the

organisation

MOE 1.4

DASR 145.A.30 (a) 1, 2, 3 (c) / AMC 145.A.30 (a) (b) 3,4,5,6 (c) - DASR 145.A.35 (i) / AMC 145.A.35 (a) 2 - AMC 145.A.45 (d) - DASR 145.A.65(a)and (c) 2 / AMC 145.A.65 (a) (c) (2) (4) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 1, 2 - DASR 145.A.90 (a) Any additional duties and responsibilities may be added provided that they do not conflict with those of the other management personnel To assist in the assessment of competence, Job description are recommended for each job role (see 3.14 and AMC DASR 145.A.30(e)) Quality system is required to be ‘independent’

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

1.5 —Management Organisation Chart Showing associated chains of responsibility of

the senior persons specified in Chapter 1.3.

MOE 1.5

DASR 145.A30 (b) (c) / AMC 145.A.30 (b) 2 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 5 Each nominated person must

Yes Yes

DR

AFT





The Form 4 holders should be identified in the chart

The names of the management personnel may be included in the boxes of the organisation chart but this is optional

report ultimately to the Accountable Manager (directly or via either the base maintenance manager, the line maintenance manager, the workshop manager or the quality manager as applicable). The Quality manager should directly report to the AM.

No

N/A

No

N/A

1.6—This paragraph shall detail the scope of the national licence by comparison to DGTA–ADF C, B1, B2 and A categories certifying staff.

Base certifying staff – category C Base maintenance support staff Line certifying staff – category A, B1 and B2 Engine shop certifying staff Component certifying staff Certifying staff under D rating, specialised

services This paragraph should detail the management of the list(s). The list must be sent to DGTA–ADF when amended. List of certifying staff and B1 and B2 support staff – must include as applicable Full name of the certifying staff Identification number of the authorisation Function Scope/limitation of authorisation Date of first issue and expiry Certifying staff of any line maintenance station located in EU Member States must be qualified in accordance with DASR 66.

MOE 1.6

DASR 145.A.30 (g) (h) - DASR 145.A.35 (j) / AMC 145.A.35 (j) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 6 / GM DASR 145.A.70 (a) 3 For larger organisation with frequent changes to CRS staff, it is possible to cross-refer from this MOE 1.6 to another record (including a computer record) where a list of the certifying and support staff is kept. In this case an explanation of where the list is maintained and how it is updated should be stated in MOE. If the list is incorporated in an appendix or separate from the basic MOE, it should be approved (directly by the DGTA–ADF or by the organisation through a procedure which has been approved by DGTA–ADF). Certifying staff assessment check list shall be attached to the list of certifying staff for

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





approval submission.

1.7 —Manpower resources Base maintenance ○ Maintenance- Aircraft / stores Component maintenance (workshops) Line maintenance ○ Station resources ○ En-route arrangements Technical support staff ○ Engineer ○ Production Planning ○ Administration Part Store staff Subcontracted services ○ Full time ○ On-demand Specialised activities Quality Department/auditing Etc

MOE 1.7

DASR 145.A30 (d) / AMC 145.A.30 (d) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) The resources described must justify the grant of approval as defined in MOE 1.8 (facilities to be approved) and MOE 1.9 (Scope of Work) in sufficient detail to explain the support at each site and for each function as required by DASR 145.A.30(d). Numbers of personnel should be given in general terms so that a clear picture is given without the need for amendment as a result of routine staff fluctuations, but able to highlight any significant re-deployment or loss of staff. Where the approval is sub-divided into sites or different major functions the resources should be related to each site and function. Resources do not only mean numbers, it also means qualifications and competence

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





1.8—Facilities Base maintenance facilities ○ Hangar accommodation ○ Specialised workshops ○ Environmental provisions ○ Office accommodation for:

(planning, technical records, quality, technical reference area, storage, etc)

Line maintenance facilities, at each location, as appropriate (see base facilities)

Component maintenance facilities Layout of premises Work away from main base / workshop

(subcontract) Where the accommodation is not owned by

the organisation, as in the case of a hangar where access is rented or shared, proof of tenancy/access may be required

MOE 1.8

DASR 145.A.25 (a) (b) (c) 1, 2, 3,4,5,6, (d)/ AMC 145.A.25 (a) 1,2,3,4 (b) (d) 1,2,3 – DASR 145.A.70 (a) 8,15 - DASR 145.A.75 (d) All sites should be covered, however, a different emphasis can be placed on sites of different importance, for example, those sites mentioned in the approval document, will need detailed description. Other significant sites, such as principal (over-night) line stations must be clearly described while en-route stations at which minor line maintenance tasks are performed may be briefly covered. The level of detail required in each case will vary with the scope of work The ‘hangar visit plan’ should be made available to commercial air transport operators supported by the organisation where the size of the accommodation gives rise to questions of adequacy of space The system of protection against weather, dust and other airborne contaminants (paint, smoke...), ground water protection, heating/air conditioning, lighting, noise protection, safety system (limited accesses, fire, staff

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





security...) should be described either in the diagram or in the associated text. In accordance with AMC DASR 145.A.25(a)3, for line maintenance of aircraft, hangars may be required. In this case the availability of a suitable hangar shall be demonstrated, particularly in the case of inclement weather for minor scheduled work and lengthy defect rectification.

1.9—Scope of Work Aircraft/helicopter Maintenance (Base – Line) For each approved site, the list should cover

rating, TC holder, A/C Model, Limitation, Maintenance Level, Base and/or Line

○ The limitation must include the engine type.

○ Refer to Appendix I to AMC to DASR 66 for A/C Model and limitations.

○ the word ‘Series’ should be deleted Engine maintenance ○ The list should cover rating, engine/APU

model, Limitation, Maintenance Level. ○ when the maintenance performed under

B1 or B3 rating is limited to boroscope inspections, the MOE should specify the engine/APU types associated to the boroscope technique limitation,

○ as some engines may be installed also by STC, should be added only the engine agreed for

MOE 1.9

DASR 145.A.20 / AMC 145.A.20 - DASR 145.A.42 (c) - Part 145.A70 (a) 9 - DASR 145.A.75 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) - DASR 145.A.80 / AMC 145.A.80 This part must be in compliance with DASR Approval Certificate (Form 3) and/or DASR Form 2. This paragraph must show the range of work carried out at each approved site within the scope of the approval. This section should also relate to MOE 1.8 and MOE 5.3 in such a way that it can be clearly seen which specific tasks are performed at which locations. In case of unforeseen maintenance such as but not limited to major repairs and

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Component maintenance ○ Rating, ATA Chapter, P/N, Designation,

Reference CMM, Level of Maintenance and workshop should be stated in the list.

○ if some C ratings are not used, the line remains empty,

○ If separate capability list is used, the list should cover rating, ATA chapter, Designation and a statement referring to cap. List. In P/N column.

Specialised services maintenance ○ The list should cover rating, limitation and

detail of limitation. Fabrication of parts in accordance with DASR

145.A.42(c) (procedure in MOE? 2.24)

modifications that is not already described within this chapter, the AMO shall contact DGTA–ADF/CAMO. Where an Organisation does not hold a D1 rating but carries out NDT tasks in the ‘course of maintenance’ under A, B and C rating, the scope of the NDT must be however detailed in this paragraph. Each specialised maintenance tasks such as but not limited to painting, welding shall be detailed in this chapter.

1.10—Notification Procedure to the Authority Regarding Changes to the Organisation's Activities / Approval / Location / Personnel.

Changes that must be notified are: Name of the organisation Approved maintenance locations / bases Addition or cancellation of approved

maintenance location / bases Change of Accountable Manager Change of nominated personnel Change of Quality Manager Any changes in company activities that could

affect the scope of approval as per DASR Form 3 or MOE 1.9, including capability lists and related to:

○ Facilities ○ Equipment

MOE 1.10

DASR 145.A.15 (a) / AMC 145.A.15 - DASR 145.A30 (a) (b) – DASR 145.A.70 (a) 10 / GM 145.A.70 (a) 9 - DASR 145.A.85 / AMC 145.A.85 DGTA–ADF approval is based on the management, organisation, resources, facilities and scope of work described in this Part 7—MOE Part 1 of the Exposition. Any significant change therefore affects the conditions under which the approval was granted and has been allowed to continue. According to DASR 145.A.85 this part of the MOE must show how the company would notify DGTA–ADF of the above items:

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





○ Tools ○ Material ○ Maintenance data ○ Procedures ○ Work scope ○ Certifying staff

In accordance with DASR 145.A.85 and AMC 145.A.15, the procedure must specify when and how (notification and submission process) the organisation will advise DGTA–ADF of any reportable changes to the organisation prior to taking place or at the earliest opportunity if unforeseen. For initial approval and change of approval applications, a statement signed by the organisation Quality Manager shall always be provided (before DGTA–ADF audit takes place) confirming that processes, areas and personnel subject to the application have been reviewed and audited showing satisfactory compliance with all applicable Part 145 requirements. The relevant audit report shall be provided to DGTA–ADF on request.

1.11—Exposition Amendment Procedures (including, delegated procedures)

Person responsible for amending the Exposition.

○ Normally the Quality Manager is responsible for the monitoring and amendment of the Exposition, including associated procedures manuals, and the submission of proposed amendments to DGTA–ADF

MOE 1.11

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 11, (b) (c) / GM 145.A.70 (a) 6, 7 - DASR 145.A.85 Indirect approval delegation is to be based upon the ability of the Quality System to deal adequately with the DASR 145 requirements. This ability cannot be therefore demonstrated at the

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Sources of proposed amendments within the organisation

Internal approval process ○ Verifying and validation of amended

procedures before use (AMC DASR 145.A.65(b) 2.)

○ MM, QM and AM sign the internal approval page

Approval process with DGTA–ADF Revision acknowledge receipt process Definition of minor amendments to the

Exposition that can be amended without the prior approval of the DGTA–ADF, if applicable and agreed

In case of minor amendment the Quality Manager may be delegated for indirect approval provided the appropriate procedure within this paragraph of the MOE is approved by DGTA–ADF.

Summary of documents, including ‘lower order’ documents, constituting the total Exposition, if applicable

Procedures for the control and amendment of capability list

Procedure for the control and amendment of the list of certifying and support staff

Effective date of the amendment ○ After DGTA–ADF has approved the

amendment the date when the amendment will take effect need to be determine, sometime to allow time to train personnel, print forms and/or distribute the revision so all personnel needed at different stations have received the revision at the date it is effective

time of the initial approval. Therefore an indirect approval procedure cannot be detailed in the MOE before the first 2 year period has been completed. In any case the DGTA–ADF must continue to receive a copy and acknowledge receipt of all such minor changes when ‘indirectly’ approved.

DR

AFT

Part 8—MOE Part 2—MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Content MOE




2.1—Supplier Evaluation and Subcontract Control Procedure

Company Policy - (sources of supplies, eg constructor, original manufacturer (OEM), distributor approved by the manufacturer, retailer, airline)

Approved Suppliers Monitoring of Suppliers and subcontractors ○ Selection processes for each type of

suppliers and subcontractors; ○ Internal acceptance processes for each

type of suppliers and authorisation of subcontractors

○ Monitoring of the internal authorisations ,eg scope of authorisation, validity, ...)

○ Withdraw of the internal authorisation. System for placing orders

Monitoring of the list of suppliers and subcontractors versus internal authorisation

○ Incoming inspection results, audit results, possible internal limitation

○ Updating of the list ○ Internal distribution of the list – access /

authorisation of computerised list ○ Assessment of the service provided Monitoring of the related suppliers and

subcontractors files Management of the purchase orders

according to the approved suppliers/ subcontractors

Records of suppliers and subcontractors information

○ Duration / location

MOE 2.1

DASR 145.A.42 (a) / AMC 145.A.42 (a) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 14, 16 - DASR 145.A.75 (b) / AMC 145.A.75 (b)

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





○ Type of documents (Certificates, audit reports, list of suppliers, incoming inspection results, …)

2.2—Acceptance/Inspection of Aircraft Components and Materials from Outside Customers

Component / Material acceptance procedures ○ Sources ○ Conformity with company requirements, eg

type of release requested ○ Records Incoming inspection ○ required documentation ○ compliance with order / condition ○ Quarantine procedure ○ Modification Standard and AD compliance ○ Identification of storage limitation/life limits

Acceptance and incoming inspection of components from internal sources e.g. transfer between stores, from the work shops

○ Conformity with company requirements ○ Records ○ Required documentation ○ Compliance with order / condition ○ Quarantine procedure ○ Identification of storage limitation/ life limits Components removed serviceable from

aircraft (AMC No 2 to DASR 145.A.50(d) par (MOE) 2.6 & 2.7)

○ SOS component Components received from customers for

Repair and/or Overhaul etc.

MOE 2.2

DASR 145.A.42 (a) 1, 4, 5 (c) / AMC 145.A.42 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) - DASR 145.A.55 (a) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 14, 16

For components removed serviceable from aircraft check related AMCs for more information.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Procedure of treatment of a suspected unapproved part « bogus part

○ Identification ○ Record ○ Notification to the Authority ○ Form used ○ Notification address to DGTA–ADF

2.3—Storage, Tagging and Release of Aircraft Components and Materials to Aircraft Maintenance

Procedures for maintaining satisfactory storage conditions (including segregation) of:

○ Rotables ○ Perishables, raw material ○ Flammable fluids ○ Engines ○ Bulky assemblies ○ Record of position in the store (s) System and procedure to control shelf life /

Life limit and AD (MOE 2.11) / modification standard

Special storage requirements (condition and limitation), eg ESD sensitive devices, rubber Tagging / Labelling system and storage areas ○ Serviceable parts /material ○ Unserviceable ○ Robbery ○ Unsalvageable components (see DASR

145.A.42(d) and M.A.505I(d)I and its AMC) ○ Quarantine ○ Batch number ○ Scrap

MOE 2.3

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Disposal of unsalvageable components (see DASR 145.A.42(d))

Issue of components to the maintenance process

Free-issue dispensing of standard parts (control, identification, segregation)

The storage condition and the storage limitation must be based upon manufacturer specifications. 2.4—Acceptance of Tools and Equipment Evaluation before procurement of tools Acceptance of tools and equipment ○ Sources ○ Conformity with organisation requirements ○ Records / listing Incoming inspection for tools and equipment ○ Receiving ○ Required documentation / certification /

calibration ○ Compliance with order / condition ○ Marking, identification/tagging/release ○ Verification of necessary control / calibration ○ Records Alternate tooling and equipment procedure ○ Approval ○ Acceptance ○ approved data used ○ manufacturing control ○ records of maintenance data Subcontracted organisation tools and

equipment, if applicable

MOE 2.4

DASR 145.A.40 (a) 1, 2, 3 (b) / AMC 145.A.40 (a) (b) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Lent / borrowed tools and equipment procedure

○ See items in acceptance and incoming above

2.5—Calibration of Tools and Equipment Control of calibrated tools and equipment System used to list and control calibrated

tools and equipment Calibration standard used Calibration interval of different tools Calibration records Control of calibration records Control and listing of un-calibrated tools and

equipment (special tools and equipment, eg contained in manufacture data)

Control of tools and equipment in need of servicing, eg jacks, hydraulic servicing units

Control of personal or loaned calibrated tools

MOE 2.5

DASR 145.A.40 (a) 1, 2, 3 (b) / AMC 145.A.40 (a) (b) 1, 2 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.6—Use of Tooling and Equipment by Staff (including alternate tools)

Distribution of tools, eg record of user and location

Determining tool serviceability prior to issue Training and control of personnel in the use of

tools and equipment –(records of training) Personal (own) instrument / tool / equipment

control Lent / borrow tools and equipment control Control of alternate tools ○ Demonstration of equivalence between

design/manufacturing data of alternate tools and the data/features of the tools recommended in the maintenance data of

MOE 2.6

DASR 145.A.40 (a) 1, 2, 3 (b) and AMC 145.A.40 (a) (b) 1,

2. Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





the manufacturers ○ In-house identification rule of alternate

tools (Part Number, Serial Number) ○ Alternate tools validation process ○ Register of alternate tools /tagging/relation

between the references of origin tools and alternate tools

○ Treatment of possible changes of maintenance data according to the new references of alternate tooling (modifications limited to the references of the tooling to be used and/or adaptation of maintenance data regarding alternate tooling)

○ Use / storage / maintenance manuals according to the need

○ In-house approval of each alternate tooling before servicing

○ Storage of the records of alternate tooling

2.7—Cleanliness Standards of Maintenance Facilities

Standard for office facilities Standard for hangar facilities Standard for component workshops (each

bay) Standard for paint shop Standard for battery shop Standard for storage facilities Standard for oil, grease and flammable liquids

storage

MOE 2.7

Think of: ‘Foreign Object’ exclusion

programme Cleaning programme Individual responsibilities Timescales Waste material disposal

Segregation of facilities to prevent cross contamination

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





2.8—Maintenance Instructions and Relationship to Aircraft / Aircraft Component Manufacturer’s Instructions including Updating and Availability to Staff

Control of information ○ Technical library ○ Subscriptions control ○ Information held / need regarding the

scope of work ○ Issue / amendment control Technical information amendment procedures

Manuals ○ Service Information (AD, SB, SIL, etc.) ○ Distribution: access to the staff Company Technical Procedures / Instructions ○ Issue / Amendments control ○ Distribution: access to the staff Maintenance documentation ○ Preparation from approved sources ○ Workcard / worksheet system (AMC

145.A.45 I): • Differentiate disassembly,

accomplishment, reassemble and testing

• Lengthy maintenance task – supplementary workcard / worksheet

○ Amendment control ○ Transfer / transcribe of airworthiness data

○ Review and identification of amendment status of maintenance instructions

○ Distribution of airworthiness data: access to the staff

MOE 2.8

DASR 145.A.45 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) / AMC 145.A.45 (b) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (e) - AMC 145.A.45 © 1, 2 (d), (f) 1, 2 (g) 1, 2, 3 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 This paragraph must describe the management procedure of the technical documentation issued by the authority responsible for continuing airworthiness of the aircraft and components. It should also cover the issue/control of CN, AD, requirements, procedures, operational orders, leaflets by the type certificate holders, STC holders, DASR 21 organisations (AMM, CMM, SRM, IPC, WDM, NDT manual, SB, SIL...) and by the Agency. NOTE: Access to maintenance data by staff must be in close proximity to the aircraft or component being maintained and readily available.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Modifying maintenance instruction DASR 145.A.45 (d)

Verification and validation of new procedures where practicable

Incorporation of best practice and human factors principles

Control of customer supplied maintenance data

Incorporation of Fuel Tank Safety concept on maintenance documentation (Job Instruction Cards etc.)

Incorporation of CDCCL concept. ED Decision # 2009/007R

○ Compliance with CDCCL instructions ○ Traceability of CDCCL completion Awareness of Technical Publications,

Instructions and Service Information by the staff

2.9—Repair Procedure Company policy Sources of repair approval, eg DOA, SRM Internal repairs External repairs Work order Maintenance instruction (job cards,..) Control of the scope of work (limitations and

conditions) Control system for fabrication of parts,

processing and inspection in accordance with DASR 145.A.42 (c)

MOE 2.9

DASR 145.A.45 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) / AMC 145.a.45 (b) (c) (d) (f) (g) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 This paragraph should refer to the repairs to be carried out not described in the manufacturers’ documentation. According to DASR 145.A.45 (d), the DASR 145 organisation may change the maintenance instructions only in accordance with the procedure described in the MOE and provided that the changes do not affect the design of the repairs.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





2.10—Aircraft Maintenance Programme Compliance

Maintenance programme variations Corrosion control programme reporting SSI reporting Reliability reporting Maintenance Preparation: ○ Taking into account Aircraft or Equipment

associated maintenance tasks/ work order ○ Checking of the scope of work according to

the Work order ○ Control of the maintenance documents (list

+ MM / job cards / series) ○ Preparation (facilities, staff, material

means, tooling...) Maintenance Programme Inspection

Standards and FTS, EWIS, Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations

MOE 2.10

DASR 145.A.45 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) / AMC 145.A.45 (b) (c) (d) (f) (g) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 (b) It is necessary to make a difference between the activities of management / developing of the maintenance programme on behalf of customers/ air carriers and the one carried out as part of DASR 145 agreement. Only the activities above which concern DASR 145 organisation works have to be presented in the MOE The maintenance program must always remain the responsibility of the Operator

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.11—Airworthiness Directives Procedure Company policy ○ Studying ADs according to the scope of

work of the organisation ○ Selection ADs according to the scope of

work of the organisation ○ Recording ADs according to the scope of

work of the organisation ○ Internal or external ADs embodiment

(linked to the scope of work) Checking and enforcement of ADs on the

equipment managed by the organisation, including the spare parts (stock)

Accomplishment of Aircraft or Equipment ADs / work orders specifying the status of the document to be used

MOE 2.11

DASR 145.A.45 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) / AMC 145.A.45 (b) 1 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 Only the activities which concern DASR 145 organisation tasks have to be described in the MOE.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Awareness of the mandatory character of the associated maintenance data

Identification of the mandatory requirement in the maintenance documentation

2.12—Optional Modification Procedure Company policy ○ Sources of modification approval (DOA,

DASR etc…) ○ Internal modification ○ External modification including

embodiment of Supplemental Type Certificate

Control of the scope of work (limitations and conditions)

Control system for fabrication of parts processing and inspection in accordance with DASR 145.A.42I already addressed in DASR 2.9

Control of the fabrication, the inspection assembly and the test of fabricated parts.

MOE 2.12

DASR 145.A.45 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) / AMC 145.A.45 (b) (c) (d) (f) (g) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 (b) This paragraph should refer to the modifications to be embodied on the aircraft/equipment/engines described in the manufacturers’ documents and the modifications not defined in manufacturers’ documents. According to DASR 145.A.45 (d), the DASR 145 organisation can only change the maintenance instructions in accordance with a procedure described in the MOE. The follow up of the Optional Modification is the responsibility of the operator who must ask their enforcement on the order sent to the maintenance organisation. It is necessary to make a difference between the activities of management / developing/launching of Optional modification on behalf of customers/ air carriers and the one carried out as part of DASR 145

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





agreement. Only the activities above which concern DASR 145 organisation works have to be presented in the MOE

2.13—Maintenance Documentation in use and its Completion

Worksheets for non-routine tasks Assembly of work packages for issue to

maintenance activity List of maintenance documents which build up

a standard work package, eg front page with general information, list of tasks required, work cards, associated work orders, …

Worksheet/work card completion –Maintenance sign-off

○ Accomplishment ○ B1/B2 Support staff Assembly of completed work package for

certification Recording of test results and dimensions

(AMC to DASR 145.A.50(d) Control and use of customer supplied work

card/worksheets

MOE 2.13

DASR 145.A.45 (e) / AMC 145.A.45 (f) - DASR 145.A.55 (a) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 This paragraph should refer to the creation of a standard work file and how to complete the work documents/ work cards making up these files. Specific instructions from manufacturer maintenance data related to CDCCL shall be considered.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.14—Technical Records Control System for control, storage conditions (fire

extinguisher system, fire detection, ...) and retrieval of records (paper or computer based)

Control of access to records (paper and / or computer based records)

Record-keeping systems (essential records) (W/P, TLB…)

Lost or destroyed records (reconstruction and DASR acceptance)

MOE 2.14

DASR 145.A.55 (a) (c) 1, 2, 3 / AMC 145.A.55 (c) / GM 145.A.55 (a) 1, 2, 3 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 (b)

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Provision of records to operator (copy or original W/P, TLB, CRS)

Retention of records ○ Periods ○ Methods and security

2.15—Rectification of Defects Arising During Base Maintenance

Base maintenance procedure: ○ Sign-off of base maintenance defects ○ Records of base maintenance defects Carrying forward defects to future

maintenance inputs - (control, accountability, owner acceptance, approved data, )

Analysis of defects and rectification Notification process (when necessary) to the

customer, TC holder, State of registry and DASR/DGCA (see MOE 2.18)

Report to the operator/ approval of the customer to launch the rectification according to the contract

MOE 2.15

Incorporation of standard defect rectification in work files, record, control, release certificate and information to the customers are to be dealt with in MOEs 2.13, 2.14, 2.16 and 2.17

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.16—Release to Service Procedure Company procedures (CRS statement) Base maintenance CRS large aircraft Base maintenance CRS other than large

aircraft if different from large aircraft Line maintenance CRS Issue of a CRS by flight crew, if applicable Component CRS (issue of DASR Form 1) Component removed as serviceable from an

aircraft, issue of DASR Form 1 (AMC 145.A.50 (a))

MOE 2.16

DASR 145.A.30 (g) (h) (i) (j) / AMC 145.A.30 (e) 3, (g) (h) (j) - Part 145.A.35 (a) to (m) / AMC 145.A.35 (a) (b) (e) (f) (g) - DASR 145.A.50 (a) (b) (d) (e) (f) / AMC 145.A.50 (a) 1, 2 (b) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 / AMC 145.A.50 (d) (e) 1, 2, 3 (f) 1, 2 - DASR 145.A.55 (a) (b) (c) / AMC 145.A.55 (c) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 - DASR 145.A.75 (e) The following cases should

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Issue of a CRS with incomplete work: ○ Enter such fact on the CRS ○ Operator/owner authority endorse on the

certificate ○ Informing, in writing, DASR (AMC 145.A.50

I 2. NOTE) ○ Informing, in writing, appropriate person(s)

as specified in 145.A.30 (b) (AMC 145.A.50 I 3.)

Sign-off after maintenance task completion (see AMC 145.A.65 (b)(3))

CRS should contain the following: ○ Cross-reference to work packs, if

applicable ○ Reference to maintenance data used,

including its revision status (mandatory) ○ Task(s) specified in the (S)TC holder’s ○ Task(s) specified in the operator/owner

instructions or AMP ○ Date/FH/Cycles/Landings etc, as

appropriate, when such maintenance was carried out

○ DASR 145 approval number The use of abbreviations (‘OK’ should not be

acceptable), capital letters, ball point pen (black or blue)

Issue of a one-off certification authorisation CRS

Certification authorisation (identity, qualified staff)

be addressed in this paragraph: The impossibility to sign a release certificate that could hazard flight safety (AD owed and not enforced, work carried out not in accordance with the approved data, without approved data, discrepancies that may have consequences on the airworthiness of the aircraft/ equipment/ engine. The temporary fitting an aircraft component without appropriate release certificate in case of AOG in stopover and associated conditions (30 hours of flight, agreement of the customer, acceptable certificate, checking the status of the equipment, technical log record, corrective action when the aircraft returns to its maintenance base...).

DR

AFT





2.17—Records for the Operator Contracted record keeping for operators Arrangements for processing and retention of

Operator’s maintenance records

MOE 2.17

DASR 145.A.55 (b) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.18—Reporting of Defects to the Competent Authority/ Operator/ Manufacturer

Methods for reporting to: ○ DGCA, DASR and allocated MNAAs ○ Manufacturer – TC/STC holder

○ Operator / owner Persons Responsible for Reporting Reportable defects Technical Occurrence report and completion

instructions Investigation procedure and follow-up system Reporting timescale Reports must contain pertinent and evaluation

results (where known) Persons responsible for reporting Defects reported by subcontractors Permitted reporting periods and retention of

data Reportable Defects Investigation procedure

and follow-up system Reporting timescale

MOE 2.18

AMC 145.A.50 (a) - DASR 145.A.60 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) / AMC 145.A.60 (b) / GM 145.A.60 (a) (c) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 This paragraph must describe the reporting procedure to DASR, the state of registry and the organisation responsible for the design of the aircraft or component any condition of the aircraft or component identified by the organisation that has resulted or may result in unsafe condition that hazards seriously the flight safety. These reporting procedures are part of the internal occurrence reporting system as detailed in DASR 145.A60 (a)(b)(c)(d), AMC 145.A60(b) and AMC 20–8 and described in MOE 2.25.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.19—Return of Defective Aircraft Components to Store

Labelling and identification of defective components (required information)

Handling and movement of components (link between involved departments)

MOE 2.19

DASR 145.A.40 - DASR 145.A.42 (d) / AMC 145.A.42 (d) 1, 2 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 MOE 2.19 should refer to the process of parts returned by

Yes

No

Yes

No

DR

AFT





Storage of defective components Components ‘On hold’ (pending determination

of serviceability status – eg Swap component for trouble shooting (SOS – AMC 145.A.50 (a))

maintenance teams to the store. Defective component means component removed from the A/C for any reason

N/A N/A

2.20—Defective Components to Outside Contractors

Dispatch of components for repair / overhaul / modification / calibration

Identification of required work Control of dispatch, location and return Return of unserviceable loan parts Management of the packaging and special

transportation condition, eg Wheels – oxygen bottles

MOE 2.20

DASR 145.A.40 - DASR 145.A.42 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 14, 16 MOE 2.20 should refer to the process of sending components to outside contractors for example for repair, overhaul, modification and calibration.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.21—Control of Computer Maintenance Records System

Information retrieval Back-up systems (frequency, means, delay)

and second site storage (frequency, means, delay)

Security and safeguards to unauthorised access

MOE 2.21

DASR 145.A.45 / AMC 145.A.45 (g) 3 AMC 145.A.50 (b) 5 - DASR 145.A.55 (c) 2 / AMC 145.a.55 (a) 4, 6, (c) 2 MOE 2.21 should refer to the computer systems used to manage and/or record information regarding the maintenance tasks carried out.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.22—Control of Man-Hour Planning versus Scheduled Maintenance Work

Management system of company planning versus time available, eg A/C or components base maintenance activity, …

Type of planning (man hours availability versus work load)

Type of factors taken into account in the

MOE 2.22

DASR 145.A.30 (d) / AMC 145.a.30 (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 (b) The man-hour plan must relate to the anticipated maintenance workload versus man-hour available. Maintenance workload includes all necessary work

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





planning: Human performance limitations

o Complexity of work o Employed vs contracted staff o Work carried out outside the scope of the

DASR 145 approval

o Aircraft hangar visit plan o Additional factors

Planning revision process Organisation of shift Notification to the Accountable Manager of

deviations exceeding 25 per cent (%) between the work load and the man hour availability

Quality monitoring

such as, but not limited to, quality monitoring, planning, maintenance record checks, production of worksheets/ cards in paper or electronic form, accomplishment of maintenance, inspection and the completion of maintenance records as well as work outside the scope of the DASR 145 approval. 50 per cent (%) should be employed directly by the organisation to ensure organisational stability

2.23—Control of Critical tasks Critical task procedures and control (line and

base maintenance activity) Critical task list

MOE 2.23

DASR 145.A.65 (b) 3 / AMC 145.A.65 (b) 3 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 (b) The MOE 2.23 procedure is to minimise the risk of multiple errors, ie to minimise the rare possibility of an error being repeated whereby the identical aircraft components are not reassembled thereby compromising more than one system. The normal procedure should ensure that no person will be required to perform maintenance task of the same type fitted to more than one system on the same aircraft during particular maintenance check. The MOE 2.23 procedure should not be confused with

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





procedure in MOE 2.25 that is known as ‘Duplicate Inspection (DI)’, dual inspection (DI) or ‘RII’. Critical tasks may however be subject to DI!

2.24—Reference to Specific Maintenance Procedures

Work away from base or work shop including occasional Line maintenance as per 145.A.75

Engine (rotors) run up Aircraft pressure run Aircraft towing

Aircraft taxiing (see also EU OPS 1.095) Test flight Technical wash Control/ supervision of de-icing systems Handling and control of waste materials Scrapping of parts

MOE 2.24

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.25—Procedures to detect and rectify Maintenance Errors

DI procedures and control (line & base maintenance activity)

List of systems/tasks subject to DI Method of maintaining the list of system tasks Method for capturing errors Method for rectifying Method for sign-off after DI Internal Reporting, see below and in MOE

2.18 2.25.1—Procedure for Internal Reporting Aims and objectives of error management

MOE 2.25

DASR 145.A.60 (a) (b) (c) (d) / AMC 145.A.60 (b) - DASR 145.A.65 (b) 3 /AMC145.A.65 (b) 3 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 The MOE 2.25 procedure is known as the system to detect and rectify maintenance errors that could impact safety if not properly performed. This is known as ‘Duplicate Inspection (DI)’, ‘Dual Inspection’ (DI) or ‘RII’. For certain task performed, a second competent person that did not take part in the

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





system o The encouragement of reporting A code of practice

o No reprisal policy Description of process to report occurrences

(occurrence reporting system) Description of process to investigate

occurrences Description of process to record occurrences The analysis of occurrence data Management actions in response to

occurrence findings

Feedback to staff Sharing information from investigations

work should perform inspection (DI) to detect possible maintenance error(s) and have error(s) rectified. Certain tasks under this procedure could be subject to procedure in MOE 2.23, ie critical task, eg installation of engines and propellers.

2.26—Shift / Task Handover Procedures Aims and objectives of the shift handover Training of personnel in shift/task handover

processes Recording of shift/task handover Description of shift handover process and

required information o Facility status o Work status o Manning status o Outstanding issues o Other possible information

Responsible person for managing and filling up the shift / task handover

MOE 2.26

DASR 145.A.47 (c) / AMC 145.A.47 (c) DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

2.27—Procedures for Notification of Maintenance Data Inaccuracies and Ambiguities to the Type Certificate Holder

MOE 2.27

DASR 145.A.45 (c) / AMC 145.A.45 © 1, 2 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 The authors are:

Yes Yes

DR

AFT





Definitions of maintenance data ambiguities Method of internal reporting (MOE 2.25.1) of

maintenance data ambiguities Method of external reporting of maintenance

data ambiguities to the authors of that data Feedback to staff and implementation of TC

Holder/Manufacturer corrections Impact of the data ambiguity on the on-going

maintenance task

Aircraft / component design organisation (AMM, SB, SRM ..)

The competent authority AD

The organisation itself in the case of organisation job cards

The customers in the case of job cards issued and furnished by the customers

No

N/A

No

N/A

2.28—Production Planning Procedures Establishment of a clear work order or

contract Procedures for establishing all necessary

resources are available before commencement of work (manpower with required capabilities, tools, equipment, parts, material, maintenance data, documentation, facilities etc.)

Procedures for organizing maintenance personnel without undue time pressure and providing all necessary support during maintenance

Consideration of human performance limitations (Circadian rhythm / 24 hours body cycle...)

Shift / task handover Planning of critical tasks Planning of task that need DI Factors to taken into account in the planning:

o logistics o inventory control o square meters of accommodation o man-hours estimation

MOE 2.28

DASR 145.A.47 (a) (b) / AMC145.A.47 (a) (b) - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12 Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o man-hours availability o preparation of work o hangar availability o environmental conditions (access, lighting

standards and cleanliness) o Co-ordination with internal and external

suppliers, etc. scheduling of safety-critical tasks during periods when staff are likely to be most alert

DR

AFT

Part 9—MOE Part 2L Content MOE




L2.1—Line Maintenance Control of Aircraft Components, Tools, Equipment, etc.

Component / Material acceptance – (required documentation, condition, ‘Quarantine’ procedure)

Components removed serviceable from aircraft (robbery – issue DASR Form 1)

Procedures to maintain satisfactory storage conditions – (routable, perishables, flammable fluids, engines, bulky assemblies, special storage requirements)

System for control of shelf life and modification standard

Tagging / labelling system (serviceable, unserviceable, robbery, scrap, etc.)

Release of components to the maintenance process

Free-issue dispensing (self-service) of standard parts (control, identification, segregation)

Tools and test equipment, servicing and calibration programme / equipment register

Identification of servicing / calibration due dates

MOE L2.1

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 - DASR 145.A.75 (b), (c), (d) MOE L2.1 must describe the additional / special procedures of the management of the facilities, materials/ ingredients and tools/ equipment, technical documentations, staff associated to the line maintenance activity of a workshop carrying out base and line maintenance.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

L2.2—Line Maintenance Procedure related to Servicing / Fuelling / De-icing / etc.

Technical and maintenance documentation management (control and amendment)

Company Technical Procedures / Instructions management

Fuel supply quality monitoring (bulk storage / aircraft re-fuelling)

Ground de-icing (procedures / monitoring of

MOE L2.2

DASR 145.A.70(a)12, 15 DASR 145.A.75(b), (c), (d) Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





sub-contractors)

Maintenance of ground support equipment Monitoring of sub-contracted ground handling

and servicing

L2.3—Line Maintenance Control of Defects and Repetitive Defects

Reportable defects – PIREPS – Engineering entries – Cabin

Rules for deferring (periods – review – permitted personnel – conformity with MEL /CDL provisions)

Awareness of deferred defects carried by aircraft – (monitoring of repetitive defects – Communication with main base)

Analysis of tech log (repetitive defects – crew complaints – Analysis and transfer of cabin log items as required)

Co-ordination with the operator

MOE L2.3

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 – DASR 145.A.75 (b), (c), (d) MOE L2.3 must describe the general procedures followed by the organisation regarding the rectification of defects and repetitive defects recorded during operation of the aircraft. The procedures should also cover the follow up of defects and repetitive defects on behalf of customers/ operators and the DASR 145 maintenance organisation

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

L2.4—Line Procedure for completion of Technical Log

Technical Log system: o Taking into account Operator Procedure o Completion of Sector Record Page o Distribution of copies

Certification / Sign-off (Maintenance Statements)

Maintenance Duplicate Inspections DLRO Certification Retention of records

o Periods o Methods and security

MOE L2.1

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 - DASR 145.A.75 (b), (c), (d) MOE L2.4 must describe the additional procedures of management/completion of the technical log(s) in use. It must also cover the procedures for DLRO release where applicable. These procedures must be associated to MOE 2.13 and MOE 2.16.

DR

AFT





L2.5—Line Procedure for pooled Parts and loan Parts

Verification of approved sources of parts (sources, conformity with company requirements, Modification Standard and AD compliance, records)

Compliance with loan and contract requirements o Tracking and control

Required documentation Processing removed loan parts for return to

source (service records) Robbery system

o Control procedures o Authority

MOE L2.5

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 - DASR 145.A.75 (b), (c), (d) MOE L2.5 must describe the additional management procedures for pooled or loaned parts specific to the line maintenance activity. It should also cover the removal of serviceable parts from aircraft for use on another aircraft. These procedures must be associated to MOEs 2.2, 2.3, 2.19 and 2.20.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

L2.6—Line Procedure for Return of Defective Parts Removed from Aircraft

Required documentation Service record Processing advice of removal (W/O) and

dispatch to technical records Dispatch of the part for rectification

MOE L2.6

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 - DASR 145.A.75 (b), (c), (d) MOE L2.6 must describe the additional management procedures for treatment of defective components associated with the line maintenance activity. These procedures must cover the same subjects specified in MOEs 2.19 and 2.20 (return of removed components, sending components...).

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

L2.7—Line Procedure Control of critical Tasks MOE L2.7

DASR 145.A.65 (b) 3 / AMC 145.A.65 (b) 3 - DASR 145.A.70 (a) 12, 15 MOE L2.7 is the equivalent of the MOE 2.23 for the line maintenance activity.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT

Part 10—MOE Part 3—QUALITY SYSTEM PROCEDURES Content MOE




3.1—Quality Audit of Organisation Procedures

Definition of the Quality System o Independence o Access to Accountable Manager o Composition and functions of management

quality group o Audit plan o Creation and management of the audit

plan o Plan to show all subparagraphs o Plan to show all area, base, line, shop(s),

different locations, subcontractors, MOE, quality procedures etc.

Company Audit Policy including compliance audit o Scheduled audits and audits to be carried

out at random and to be carried out during maintenance including night shifts

o Audit notification o Audit reports (documents used, writer,

issue, points checked and deviations noted, deadline for rectification)

o Validation/internal approval of the audit programme

Annual Review of Maintenance Procedures o Principles of annual audit procedure

planning o Independence of the auditors o Common audit procedures for several lines

of product o Specific audit procedure by line of product o Audits during the performance of work

MOE 3.1

DASR 145.A.65 (a) - DASR 145.A.65 (c) (1), (2) / AMC 145.A.65 (c) (1)

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Complete audits or several partial audits o Principles when deviations are noted on a

line of product o Grouping of audits

Audit programme o Adequate facilities o Compliance with approved procedures o Dates and timescales o Product audits o Audit of Subcontractors and evaluation of

suppliers Quality audit reports retention

o Duration (At least duration of 2 years) / location

o Type of documents (notification, audit reports, check list, audit programs

3.2—Quality audit of aircraft (and / or equipment)

Company Audit Policy o A dedicated quality audit policy may be

added, provided it does not conflict with the one describe in the previous paragraph. The Company audit procedure should include the quality audit of aircraft (and/or equipment)

Audit programme o Product samples for each line of product

(aircraft and / or components o Dates and timescales

Auditing methods o Sampling o ‘Trail’ / ‘investigation’ audits

MOE 3.2

DASR 145.A.65 (c) (1), (2) / AMC 145.A.65 (c) (1) MOE 3.2 must describe the procedures related to the product audits (aircraft, aircraft component, engine, specialised service) according to DASR 145.A.65 (c) 1 and AMC 145.A.65 (c).

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Records of Quality audit reports retention o Duration (At least duration of 2 years) /

location o Type of documents (notification, audit

reports, check list, audit programs, …)

3.3—Quality audit corrective action procedure Description of the quality audit report

feedback system Corrective action and timescale

o Corrective action planning and follow up o The corrective action plan shall be

designed in a way which allows identifying and recording the finding, the root cause, the relevant immediate and long term preventive action with the appropriate timescales

o Procedure describing the MO action when the corrective action deadline has to be postponed or when the answer has not been received on time

Management responsibilities for corrective action and follow-up Quality audit and feedback records retention o Duration (minimum duration of 2 years) /

location o Type of documents (answers,

evidences,…) Review of the Quality system overall results

o Meeting with the Accountable Manager. (including record of meeting procedure) (AMC 145.A.65 (c)(2) 4.)

o Regular meetings to check the progress of corrective actions or

o Meeting twice per year

MOE 3.3

DASR 145.A.65 (c) (2) / AMC 145.A.65 (c) (2) MOE 3.3 must describe the procedures of follow up of corrective actions. The follow up of corrective actions cannot be subcontracted The revision of the audit planning according to the deviations noted/corrected could be linked to MOE 3.1.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Meeting called by AM – how? o Half year summary report from QM on

findings of noncompliance o Content of summary report

3.4—Certifying staff and support staff qualification and training procedures

Experience, training and competence requirements o The applicant shall hold a valid licence or a

valid certifying staff authorisation under the country’s national regulations (CASRs) in accordance with ICAO Annex I or a DASR 66 Licence

o The applicant should demonstrate he/she has received training on Modules 9 and 10.

o Should have FTS / CDCCL/ EWIS trainings The person shall demonstrate 5 years

maintenance experience for line maintenance certifying staff and 8 years for base maintenance certifying staff.

Persons whose authorised tasks do not exceed those of a DASR 66 category A certifying staff, need to demonstrate 3 years maintenance experience only

Line maintenance certifying staff and base maintenance support staff shall demonstrate he/she received type training and passed examination at the category B1, B2 or B3 level, as applicable, referred to in Appendix III to Annex III (DASR 66) for each aircraft type in the scope of work

Base maintenance certifying staff shall demonstrate he/she received type training and passed examination at the category C level referred to in Appendix III to Annex III (DASR 66) for each aircraft type in the scope of work,

MOE 3.4

DASR 145.A.30 ©, (e), (g), (j) (1, 3, 4, 5) - DASR 145.A.35 (a) to (i) and (m) / AMC 145.A.35 (b), (e) - Appendix IV The requirements of DASR 145 Appendix IV shall be reflected in this procedure. Certifying staff of any line maintenance station located in EU Member States must be qualified in accordance with DASR 66. The scope of work of the person shall not exceed the scope of work defined by the national licence persons whose scope of work does not exceed those of a category A certifying staff may receive task training in lieu of a complete type training. The personnel having privileges before the entry into force of the relevant requirements of Annex III (DASR 66) may continue to exercise them without the need to comply with modules 9 and 10 training and type training requirement.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





except that for the first aircraft type, training and examination shall be at the category B1, B2 or B3 level of Appendix III.

Examination, test and assessment procedures Continuation training procedures including

o Programme (MOE, DASR 145, HF, FTS, EWIS, technology special requirements, etc…

o Procedures Qualifying subcontractor's personnel (if

applicable) Authorisations issue, renewal or withdrawal

procedures o QM responsible o Recency – 6 month of experience during a

two year period o Licence validity control o Continuation training o Evaluation, test

One off Certification Authorisation Flight crew limited certification authorisation

3.5—Certifying staff and Support staff records List of certifying personnel and support staff

(refer if need be to MOE 1.6) Minimum information of staff particulars

o See AMC 145.A.35 (j) o Type of record: electronic and or paper

Management of certifying staff records Retention of records

o Duration - at least 3 years after the authorisation has been withdrawn and/ or ceased employment of the certifying staff.

o Location

MOE 3.5

DASR 145.A.35 (j), (k), (l) / AMC 145.A.35 (j) – DASR 145.A.70 (a) The scope of work has to be detailed, including limitations when applicable. For category A staff, for each type of aircraft, an exhaustive file of the authorised tasks has to be defined.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Type of documents Format of authorisation document and

authorisation codes Control of certifying staff records Access to staff records

o Authorised persons o DGTA–ADF / DGCA personnel o Authorised managers

3.6—Quality Audit Personnel Nominated personnel Required experience, training and

competence of quality audit personnel including continuation training

Examination, test and assessment procedures (as necessary – can refer to MOE 3.14)

Independence of quality audit personnel when the organisation uses skilled personnel working within another department than that of Quality

Retention of records o Duration / location o Type of documents

MOE 3.6

DASR 145.A.30 (e) MOE 3.6 must describe how the Quality system personnel are managed. Allocated man-hours (if not full-time) should be addressed. The number of quality personnel should be adapted to the maintenance activity to be supervised (relation with MOE 2.22).

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

3.7—Qualifying Inspectors Required experience (duration and technical),

training and competence requirements (including FTS, CDCCL, EWIS)

Examination, test and assessment procedures including practical assessment (can refer to MOE 3.14)

Continuation training procedures including o Training Programme (MOE and associated

procedures, DASR 145, Human Factors, special requirements, …)

MOE 3.7

AMC 145.A.30(e). MOE 3.7 is dedicated to the qualification of the supervisors (or production inspectors/controllers) as defined in AMC 145.A.30 (e).

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Training setting up o Duration, intervals


3.8—Qualifying mechanics Required experience (duration and technical),

training and competence requirements (including FTS, CDCCL, EWIS)

Examination, test and assessment procedures including practical assessment

Continuation training procedures including o Training Programme (MOE and associated

procedures, DASR 145, Human Factors, special requirements, …)

o Training Setting up o Duration / intervals


MOE 3.8

DASR 145.A.35 (a), (m) MOE 3.8 should refer to the different specialities of technicians (mechanics, avionics, sheet metal workers, cabin, fuel, engines, components, NDT staff, composites, line maintenance...) of the organisation.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

3.9—Aircraft or aircraft component maintenance tasks exemption process control

System for control and processing with the DASR/DGCA which includes o Relations with the operator / customer in

case of derogation for an intervention in progress by the workshop

o Supply to the customer / operator of information enabling to write out requests for exceptional authorisation applications

o Control of the approval by the DASR/DGCA (linked with CRS)

MOE 3.9

MOE 3.9 must describe the procedures of the organisation regarding exceptional authorisations related to maintenance tasks. The difference between the activity study/ preparation/ redaction/ submission of exceptional authorisation application related to maintenance tasks on behalf of customers/ operator and the DASR 145 activity here above should be kept in

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Retention of records o Duration o Location o Type of documents

mind.

3.10—Concession control for deviation from the organisations’ procedures

Concession criteria o Object, procedures involved, justifications,

compensatory conditions, period of validity, etc.

Concession management procedure o Internal evaluation o Drafting process o Response o Internal validation process and follow-up

System of approval and control of concession Retention of records

o Duration o Location o Type of documents

MOE 3.10

MOE 3.10 must describe the procedures followed by the AMO in order to deviate from the approved MOE procedures

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

3.11—Qualification procedure for specialised activities such as non-destructive testing, welding etc.

NDT staff: o List of non-destructive testing personnel o Levels of qualification and authorisation o Role and privileges of these staff (including

responsible level 3 person who should approve the organisation’s NDT procedures and written practice for training and certification of NDT personnel.)

MOE 3.11

Part 145.A.30 (f), European Standard (EN) 4179—Aerospace Series – Qualification and approval of personnel for non-destructive testing MOE 3.11 should refer to the qualification of specialised services staff such as defined in AMC 145.A.30 (f). It should also apply to welders. The certifying staff authorised in accordance with

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





Experience and qualification: o Criteria regarding experience, training and

skills o Experience required by NDT method for

each level of authorisation Training:

o Basic NDT training for each level of authorisation

o Training on the NDT procedures of the organisation

Examination: o Procedure of skills assessment (practical

assessment and/or examination related to the job card)

o General examination on the fundamentals of the NDT methods

o Specific examination by NDT method o Practical examination by level of

authorisation o Medical examination o Eyesight testing

Continuation training and testing Auditing of staff and system Authorisations issue, renewal or withdraw

procedures Retention of NDT staff records

o Duration / location o Type of documents

Contract arrangement

subcategory B1 of the DASR 66 can carry out and/or control colour contrast dye Penetrant tests. When an Organisation uses NDT methods defined by EN 4179 paragraph 6.4—Emerging NDT methods the related requirements for personnel training, experience and examination should be established by the organisation in accordance with EN 4179 and the particular equipment manufacturers’ recommendations.

DR

AFT





3.12—Control of manufacturers’ and other maintenance working teams

Source of work (manufacturer team, another DASR 145 MO team) and authorisation of personnel

System for control of materials, working instructions and procedures

System for control of documentation such as drawings, modification, repairs instructions

Management of the progress of work (meetings, etc.)

Certification procedure for work performed by the outside team such as: repair, replacement, modification, overhaul, test, inspection

Environmental conditions Final certification by the organisation Training on the internal procedures to external

staff

MOE 3.12

MOE 3.12 should refer to the role of outside teams acting in the premises of the organisation to carry out a maintenance task on an aircraft / engine/ equipment in the scope of a task under the responsibility of the organisation.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

3.13—Human factors training procedure Aims and objectives Categories of staff to be trained Training methods and syllabus

o Initial training o Continuation training

Duration of training for o Initial training o Continuation training

Validation of the training courses (syllabus and duration)

Requirements for trainers Training Records

o Duration

MOE 3.13

DASR 145.A.30 (e) / AMC 145.A.30 (e) 6, 8, 9, 10 - DASR 145.A.35 (d) - DASR 145.A.65 (b) Initial training to be provided to personnel within 6 months of joining the maintenance organisation, but temporary staff may need to be trained shortly after joining the organisation (AMC145.A.30 (e) 6). Human factors continuation training should be in relation to relevant quality audit findings and other internal/external sources of information available to the

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Location o Type of documents

organisation on human errors in maintenance (link with MOE 2.25) (AMC145.A.30 (e) 8). Human factors continuation training should be amended according to the relevant quality audit findings and other internal/external sources of information available to the organisation on human errors in maintenance (link with MOE 2.25) (AMC145.A.30 (e) 8). Human factors training could be adjusted to reflect the particular nature of the organisation (size, scope of work). Human factors continuation training should be of an appropriate duration in each two year period.

3.14—Competence assessment of personnel Personnel to be assessed in accordance with

DASR 145.A.30 (e) Assessment procedures/ Evaluation system

o Training o Qualifications o Supervision o Assessors o Commission/ examination

Management competence assessment Assessment records

o Duration

MOE 3.14

DASR 145.A.30 (e) / AMC 145.A.30 (e) 2 MOE 3.14 applies to all personnel involved in the organisation’s maintenance and quality activities and particularly the staff and the personnel working for the production support services (engineering, planning / preparation, reception supervisors, store keepers, tools administrators, purchasers, subcontractors, administrators ...).

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Location o Type of documents

To assist in the assessment of competence, job descriptions are recommended in the MOE for each job role in the organisation.

DR

AFT

Part 11—MOE Part 4 Content MOE




4.1—Contracting Operators MOE 4.1

List those operators for whom maintenance is provided, with details of the types of aircraft (and/or engines/APU) and the scope of work undertaken, eg Base maintenance, Line maintenance, defect, rectification, with any limitations. It should be shown whether the contract is solely for carrying out maintenance or also for performing the Operator's maintenance management tasks.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

4.2—Operator Procedures and Paperwork MOE 4.2

DASR 145.A.70 (a) 13 This paragraph must describe for each contracting operator, the special mode of operation (procedures/ documents/ exchange of information, planning meetings, technical, quality, reliability) between the organisation and its customer.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

4.3—Operator record completion This paragraph must describe (for each

contracted operator) how the organisation: Completes operator's log books Keeps the operator's technical records Retains records on behalf of the operators Communicates with the operator

MOE 4.3

DASR 145.A.55 DASR 145.A.70(a)13 Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





5.1—Sample of Documents Sample of all forms used and referred to in the

procedures DASR forms exactly as per IR, eg DASR

Form 1 Example of forms:

o Request to DGTA–ADF for approval of an Exposition amendment

o MOE revision acknowledgement form o Request to DGTA–ADF for acceptance of

a Capability List change o Material tags: o Serviceable o Unserviceable o Robbery o Quarantine o Unsalvageable / Scrap labels o Tooling identification and calibration due

tag o Register of calibrated and special tools o Register of equipment’s o AD control card / record o Maintenance Task Card (Scheduled

Maintenance) o Maintenance Task Card (Additional

Defects) o Base Maintenance CRS o Line Maintenance CRS o DASR Form 1 o Un-airworthy Conditions Report Form o Quality Audit Report Form o Quality Audit Remedial / Corrective Action

Report Form

MOE 5.1

This is a typical List of company Forms and is not intended to be exhaustive or to represent the forms required for any particular organisation. The approved organisation must include those Forms with which it controls and records its maintenance work and procedures.

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT





o Personnel Training Record o Certifying Staff Authorisation Record o Certifying Staff Authorisation o Concession Application and Approval o Staff assessment form

All forms should have form number and revision status.

5.2—List of Subcontractors as per DASR 145.A.75 (b)

This paragraph must list the non-DASR 145 subcontractors under cover of the maintenance organisation quality system

Any approved maintenance organisation that carries out maintenance for another approved maintenance organisation within its own approval scope is not considered to be subcontracting.

The MOE much contain a procedure for the control of subcontractors, eg in MOE 2.1

MOE 5.2

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

5.3—List of Line Maintenance Locations as per DASR 145.A.75(d)

This paragraph must list the line station locations (airport and addresses) – linked with MOE 1.8

For organisations that are not adding or deleting line stations frequently must list the line stations in this part, ie cannot refer to a separate list or document

MOE 5.3

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

5.4—List of Contracted Organisations as per 145.A.70 (a) (16)

This paragraph must provide the list of contracted organisation such as but not limited to DASR 145.

NDT contractors

MOE 5.4

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

N/A

DR

AFT


Part 13—MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION AND MOE DATA

Name of the Approved Organisation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Approval Reference ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Issue Number ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Revision/Amendment Number ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Date of Revision ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Part 14—INSPECTOR INFORMATION Name of the Inspectors Signatures of the Inspectors Date of the Inspection

................................................................................. ................................................................................. .......................................................................................

................................................................................. ................................................................................. .......................................................................................

................................................................................. ................................................................................. .......................................................................................

................................................................................. ................................................................................. .......................................................................................

Date of the Approval

…………………………………………… (dd/mmm/yyyy)