magnetism of a tetrahedral spin-chain
TRANSCRIPT
Physica B 312-313 (2002) 594–596
Magnetism of a tetrahedral spin-chain
Wolfram Breniga,*, Klaus W. Beckerb, Peter Lemmensc
a Institut f .ur Theoretische Physik, TU Braunschweig, Mendelssohnstr. 3, 38106 Braunschweig, Germanyb Institut f .ur Theoretische Physik, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germanyc II. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Abstract
Magnetic properties of a completely frustrated tetrahedral chain are summarized. Using exact diagonalization, and
bond-operator theory results for the ground-state phase diagram, the one-triplet excitations and the Raman spectrum
are given. The link to novel tellurate materials is clarified. r 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Quantized spin models; Antiferromagnetics; Quantum critical points
Recently, tellurates of type Cu2Te2O5X2 with X ¼ Cl;Br have been identified as a new class of spin-1
2
tetrahedral-cluster compounds [1]. Bulk thermodynamic
data has been analyzed in the limit of isolated tetrahedra
[1]. Raman spectroscopy, however indicates substantial
inter-tetrahedral coupling [2]. In this brief note we
summarize results on the magnetism of a purely one-
dimensional (1D) chain of tetrahedra which is coupled in
a geometry analogous to that along the c-axis direction
of Cu2Te2O5X2: In this direction the exchange topology
is almost completely frustrated suggesting the spin-
model of Fig. 1. The hamiltonian can be written as a 1D
chain in terms of the total edge-spin operators T1ð2Þl ¼S1ð4Þl þ S3ð2Þl and the dimensionless couplings b ¼ J3=J1and a ¼ J2=J1
H
J1¼
Xl
T1lT2l þ bT2lT1lþ1 þa
2ðT2
1l þ T22lÞ �
3a
2
� �:
ð1Þ
This model displays infinitely many local conservation
laws: ½H ;T2ið¼1;2Þl � ¼ 0; 8l; i ¼ 1; 2: The Hilbert space
decomposes into sectors of fixed distributions of edge-
spin eigenvalues Til ¼ 1 or 0, each corresponding to a
sequences of spin-1 chain-segments with bond-alterna-
tion intermitted by chain-segments of localized singlets.
For aoacðbÞ the ground state is found [3] to be in the
sector of the infinite-length, spin-1 chain with bond-
alternation, i.e. Til ¼ 1 for all i; l; with a dimer phase at
bobc and a Haldane phase for b > bc: For a > acðbÞ theinfinite-length product state of singlets, i.e. Til ¼ 0 for all
i; l is realized. In the latter case the ground state energy isEG ¼ �N3a=2: In the former case we have used exact
diagonalization (ED) on up to 2N ¼ 16 sites, as well as
bond-boson theory to determine the ground state energy
and phase boundaries. The phase diagram is shown in
Fig. 2. Since, by T2lð1lþ1Þ-T1lð2lÞ; Eq. (1) is symmetric
under ðJ1; a; bÞ-ðJ1b; a=b; 1=bÞ; a correspondingly re-
scaled mirror image of Fig. 2 exists. The combination of
both covers the complete parameter space. The critical
value of acðb ¼ 0Þ ¼ 1 for the 1st-order transition from
the dimer to the singlet product state agrees with Ref.
[1], while a2N¼16c ðb ¼ 1Þ ¼ 1:403y agrees with Ref. [4].
For the 2nd-order dimer–Haldane transition we find
bcC35from finite-size extrapolation [3], which is con-
sistent with Ref. [5].
In addition to ED, Fig. 2 displays results of an
analytic bond–boson approach to the spin-1 chain sector
with bond-alternation. Labeling the singlet, triplet and
quintet states of a tetrahedron by bosons s; ta; qa; withthe unit-cell index suppressed, and discarding the high-
energy quintets the edge-spins can be replaced by Ta1=2 ¼
7ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi2=3
pðtwas þ swtaÞ � ieabgt
wbtg=2: This transforms Eq. (1)
into an interacting bose gas including a hardcore
constraint sws þ twata þ qwaqa ¼ 1: Condensing the sing-
lets, i.e. sðwÞ ¼ /sS; to either /sS ¼ 1 (Linear Holstein
Primakoff (LHP) approximation) or to a selfconsistently
determined mean field(MFT)-value /sSo1 the model
can be diagonalized on the quadratic level [3]. Contrast-*Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Brenig).
0921-4526/02/$ - see front matter r 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 4 5 2 6 ( 0 1 ) 0 1 4 7 8 - 8
ing the resulting ground state energy against the singlet
product state the stared(circled)-dashed phase bound-
aries of Fig. 2 are obtained. In the dimer-phase region
the agreement with ED is very good, both for LHP and
MFT. In principle, the singlet condensate restricts the
bond–boson approaches to the dimer phase. In fact, the
LHP spin-gap closes at b ¼ 38confining the LHP to
bo38obc: The MFT can be extended into the Haldane
regime, even though the ground state symmetries are
different, yielding a transition line qualitatively still
comparable to ED.
Next, we consider excitations in the dimer phase
which would be a likely candidate for the tellurates
assuming weakly coupled tetrahedra. The excited states
may (i) remain in the spin-1 chain sector with bond-
alternation, or (ii) involve transitions into sectors with
localized edge-singlets. As has been pointed out in Ref.
[1], for a single tetrahedron, the energy of a pair of two
type-(ii) excitations resides in the spin gap of sector (i)
for 12pap1: While analogous, dispersionless singlets are
found in the spin gap of the dimer phase of the lattice
model [3], we only report on one- and two-triplet
excitations of type (i) in this brief note: Fig. 3a displays
the dispersion of the first triplet, comparing ED, LHP,
and MFT. The agreement is very good. Fig. 3b displays
the magnetic Raman spectrum, i.e. total spin-zero, two-
triplet excitations, based on bond-boson theory and a
Loudon–Fleury vertex with c-axis polarization, i.e. for
the electric-field vector of the incoming and outgoing
light parallel to the c-axis. As the Raman susceptibility is
a two-triplet propagator, on the two-particle level, we
can account for quartic triplet-interactions beyond the
LHP approach exactly by summing all ladder-diagrams,
i.e. the T-matrix [3]. Due to the existence of a singlet
bound-state which occurs in the T-matrix, and which
merges with the continuum at zero momentum the
renormalized Raman spectrum deviates strongly from
the bare one. The sharp cut-off at either end of the
continuum is due to the LHP triplet-propagators
displaying a single, coherent and dispersive pole.
Available Raman data on Cu2Te2O5Br2 [2] displays a
sharp mode at 20 cm�1 and a continuum centered at
60 cm�1: One might speculate the sharp mode to
correspond to transitions of the aforementioned type
(ii) and the continuum to correspond to that of Fig. 3b.
However, the measured continuum is definitely more
symmetric than the solid line in Fig. 3b. This leaves the
magnetism of the tellurates an open issue deserving
further studies.
Uncited reference
[6]
Acknowledgements
It is a pleasure to thank R. Valenti, C. Gros, and
F. Mila for stimulating discussions and comments. This
research was supported in part by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft under Grant No. BR 1084/1-2.
J1
J2
J3
23
1 4
... ...
lFig. 1. The tetrahedral cluster-chain. l labels the unit cell
containing spin-12moments at the vertices 1;y; 4:
0 0.5 1 1.5a = J
2/J
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
b =
J3/J
1
Dimer
Haldane
Singlet product
oo
MFT
LHP
N=16
Fig. 2. Phases of the tetrahedral chain. Solid lines: exact
diagonalization. Haldane–Dimer transition at bE35: Stared
(circled) dashed lines: bond-boson mean-field/MFT (Holstein–
Primakoff/LHP) approach. LHP terminates at b ¼ 38:
0 π 2πk
0
0.5
1
1.5
Ek/J
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5ω/J
1
0
5
10
I(ω
) a
.u.
0
N=14, Sz=0 _ _ _ MFT____ LHP
b=0.1 0.2 0.3
2∆ST
_ _ _ bare____ T−matrix
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. (a) Low lying excitations in the spin-1 chain sector with
bond-alternation. (b) Two-magnon Raman spectrum.
W. Brenig et al. / Physica B 312-313 (2002) 594–596 595
References
[1] M. Johnsson, et al., Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 2853.
[2] P. Lemmens, et al., in preparation.
[3] W. Brenig, K.W. Becker, in preparation.
[4] A. Honecker, F. Mila, M. Troyer, Eur. Phys. J. B. 15 (2000)
227.
[5] Y. Kato, A. Tanaka, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 63 (1993)
1277.
[6] W. Brenig, Phys. Rev. B 56 (1997) 14441.
W. Brenig et al. / Physica B 312-313 (2002) 594–596596