magnetic susceptibility report

13
Chapter one (1) Introduction Magnetic susceptibility is the property of a material which determines how much magnetization will be present due to an external magnetic field. Because everything in a rock or mineral contributes to the magnetic susceptibility, it is a fertile source of information on the composition of the sample. Magnetic susceptibility is extremely effective in geological mapping, macroscopically similar, but magnetically different rocks can be distinguished and delineated. Some processes of alteration of original rocks are accompanied by changes in rock's magnetic mineralogy, thus phase changes or destruction of original magnetic minerals, formation of new magnetic minerals. As these changes are usually reflected in rock's magnetic susceptibility, they are easily detectable by susceptibility measurement. Magnetic susceptibility mapping depends on geochemical or mineralogical composition of the rocks and on later metamorphic processes and alterations. The aim of the survey was to map the site based on mineralogical composition of the rocks or soil. 1.1 Literature review The physical background for the existence of magnetic behavior in minerals is the magnetic moment produced by electrons orbiting their nucleus and spinning around their axis. The major rock-forming magnetic minerals are the following iron oxides: the titanomagnetite series, xFe2TiO4 · (1 x)Fe3O4, where Fe3O4 is magnetite, the most magnetic mineral; the ilmenohematite series, yFeTiO3 · (1 y)Fe2O3, where α-Fe2O3 (in its rhombohedral structure) is hematite; maghemite, γ-Fe2O3 (in which some iron atoms are missing in the hematite structure); and limonite (hydrous iron oxides). They also include sulfidesnamely, the pyrrhotite series, yFeS · (1 - y)Fe1 - xS. The magnetic character of soils is dominated by the presence of ferrimagnetic minerals such as magnetite and maghemite, and to a lesser degree by pyrrhotite (Ward, 1990).

Upload: sackeynat

Post on 11-Nov-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A report on Magnetic susceptibility survey

TRANSCRIPT

  • Chapter one (1)

    Introduction

    Magnetic susceptibility is the property of a material which determines how much magnetization will be

    present due to an external magnetic field. Because everything in a rock or mineral contributes to the

    magnetic susceptibility, it is a fertile source of information on the composition of the sample. Magnetic

    susceptibility is extremely effective in geological mapping, macroscopically similar, but magnetically

    different rocks can be distinguished and delineated.

    Some processes of alteration of original rocks are accompanied by changes in rock's magnetic

    mineralogy, thus phase changes or destruction of original magnetic minerals, formation of new

    magnetic minerals. As these changes are usually reflected in rock's magnetic susceptibility, they are

    easily detectable by susceptibility measurement.

    Magnetic susceptibility mapping depends on geochemical or mineralogical composition of the rocks

    and on later metamorphic processes and alterations. The aim of the survey was to map the site based on

    mineralogical composition of the rocks or soil.

    1.1 Literature review

    The physical background for the existence of magnetic behavior in minerals is the magnetic moment

    produced by electrons orbiting their nucleus and spinning around their axis. The major rock-forming

    magnetic minerals are the following iron oxides: the titanomagnetite series, xFe2TiO4 (1 x)Fe3O4,

    where Fe3O4 is magnetite, the most magnetic mineral; the ilmenohematite series, yFeTiO3 (1

    y)Fe2O3, where -Fe2O3 (in its rhombohedral structure) is hematite; maghemite, -Fe2O3 (in which

    some iron atoms are missing in the hematite structure); and limonite (hydrous iron oxides). They also

    include sulfidesnamely, the pyrrhotite series, yFeS (1 - y)Fe1 - xS. The magnetic character of soils

    is dominated by the presence of ferrimagnetic minerals such as magnetite and maghemite, and to a

    lesser degree by pyrrhotite (Ward, 1990).

  • Minerals are classified as either diamagnetic or paramagnetic. Diamagnetic materials have negative and

    very low susceptibilities. Most paramagnetic materials have positive susceptibilities but also with very

    low values, so they are not of interest in geophysical surveys. Some paramagnetic materials are

    ferromagnetic which have alignments of magnetic moments in small areas called magnetic domains.

    These materials are not naturally occuring on earth, so again they are not of interest in exploration.

    Ferrimagnetic minerals, on the other hand, are common and naturally occuring. These minerals (e.g.

    magnetite, pyrrhotite) have a net magnetic moment and thus relatively high susceptibilities. In general,

    igneous and metamorphic rocks have higher susceptibilities than sedimentary rocks. Except for rare

    monomineralic rocks, rocks consist in general of all three kinds - i.e. diamagnetic, paramagnetic and

    ferromagnetic minerals.

    Table 1. Magnetic susceptibilities for several iron oxides and soil constituents. Data from Thompson &

    Oldfield(1986) and Maher(1988).

    Material Chemical formula Magnetic status Magnetic susceptibility

    (10-8 m3 kg-1)

    Water H2O Diamagnetic -0.9

    Quartz SiO2 Diamagnetic -0.6

    Pyrite FeS2 Paramagnetic 30

    Ferrihydrite 5Fe2O3 9H2O Paramagnetic 40

    Lepidocrocite -FeOOH Paramagnetic 70

    Ilmenite FeTiO3 Superparamagnetic 200

    Hematite -Fe2O3 Antiferromagnetic 60

    Goethite -FeOOH Antiferromagnetic 70

    Pyrrhotite Fe7S8 / Fe8S9 / Fe9S10 Ferrimagnetic ~5,000

    Maghemite -Fe2O3 Ferrimagnetic 40,000

    Magnetite Fe3O4 Ferrimagnetic 50,000

    Table 1: Magnetic susceptibilities for several iron oxides and soil constituents. Data from Thompson &

    Oldfield(1986) and Maher(1988)

    Iron minerals within the soil can be altered through biological decay and burning which can enhance

  • the magnetic susceptibility of the soil. Field equipment can be used to measure the magnetic

    susceptibility of the soil allowing zones to be mapped.

    Le Borgne (1955, 1960) has suggested that the enhanced susceptibilities of soil is due to in situ

    conversion of iron oxides from an antiferromgnnetic form such as haematite or goethite to

    ferrimagnetic form maghaemite. He also proposed two possible mechanisms. In the first, reduction

    occurs as a result of the decay of organic matter in the soil in anaerobic conditions achieved during wet

    periods and reoxidation to maghaemite in aerobic conditions during dry periods. In the second the

    burning of organic matter produces the temperature increase and reducing atmosphere necessary for the

    reduction to magnetite in a thin layer of soil underlying the fire and reoxidation occurs during the

    cooling down of the fires when air enters the system.

    If rocks containing oil undergo elevated temperature, some Fe oxides and hydroxides can transform

    in the reduction environment due to the presence of the organic substance into ferrimagnetic

    minerals, which results in the increase of magnetic susceptibility. Particularly obvious is this process

    in the oil deposits which underwent natural combustion. These are characterized by the existence of

    intense magnetic anomalies and high susceptibility (Cisowski and Fuller 1987).

    The natural variation in the soil properties gives rise to anomalies, similar to anomalies that are the

    result of buried objects. The discrimination between these geological or soil anomalies and buried

    object anomalies is extremely complicated. The location of buried features depends on the fact that the

    magnetic susceptibilities of soil derived from sedimentary rocks is normally higher than that of the

    parent rock. In strongly magnetic soils, magnetic and electromagnetic sensors often detect anomalies

    that have a geologic origin. For most iron or steel objects, the susceptibility, k, falls between 10 and 200

    in SI units. However, predicting the response of a magnetic susceptibility survey over metal is

    complicated for several reasons. Remanent magnetisation is likely to be strong, and pointing in

    different directions in the various components of a buried object. For example, a buried pipe will often

  • show up as a linear set of anomalies with variable character because each segment will have it's own

    magnetic signature. It is worth mentioning that stainless steel is not magnetic, and many potential

    targets may not even be ferrous (for example, aircraft frame parts are often some alloy with no

    magnetic properties). (Breiner, 1973)

    Magnetic susceptibility is an effective technique often used as a form of reconnaissance survey. Natural

    magnetite and pyrrhotite (i.e. mixture of hexagonal and monoclinic phases), or other ferrimagnetic

    minerals, tend to accumulate in ore deposits (including the non-iron ones) or in their

    environs. Even though they do not often represent the economic minerals, their magnetic properties

    can be important in the search for ore deposits, because these minerals often accompany the economic

    metallizations in various ways. Thanks to their high susceptibility and remanent magnetization, these

    minerals can be surveyed not only by geoelectrical methods, like the mineralizations of many other

    minerals, but also by magnetometric methods. The measured magnetic anomalies can directly indicate

    those ore deposits in which the distribution of ferrimagnetic minerals conforms to the distribution of

    the economic mineralization and, of course, those ore deposits in which these minerals represent the

    economic mineralization. However, in most cases these ferrimagnetic minerals create only haloes in

    footwall rocks and the susceptibilities can indicate the deposit only indirectly. In both cases, it is useful

    to measure the magnetic susceptibility in situ, in order to get an idea of the spatial relationship between

    the susceptibility and the economic mineralization, which can be utilized in magnetic survey of the

    deposits of a similar type. If a ferrimagnetic mineral creates an economic mineralization, the magnetic

    susceptibility can be used in the fast control of the searched or exploited ore. This case often takes

    place in metamorphosed oxidic Fe-ores, magnetite skarns and also in bodies of metamorphosed siderite

    ores, originally metasomatic in origin.

    In addition to magnetite and pyrrhotite, other rare magnetic minerals can be interesting from the

    point of view of economic geology, such as: cassiterite, franklinite, cobaltite, Ni-sulphides, etc. The

    magnetic minerals, hematite, pyrrhotite and magnetite, often occur in sulphide ore deposits. Various

  • alterations may give rise to transformation and even destruction and subsequent disappearance of

    ferrimagnetic minerals from a deposit (Hrouda et al 2009).

    Magnetic susceptibility is useful for mapping anthropogenic heavy metal pollution in soil based on the

    idea that topsoil has more magnetic content than subsoil samples due to the settling of anthropogenic

    magnetic particles.

    Moreso, Magnetic susceptibility is enhanced where magnetite spheres produced in the combustion of

    petroleum products are present as pollutants in dust particles. Therefore, magnetic susceptibility can be

    used as a tracer of industrial pollution (e.g., Petrovsky et al. 2000).

    1.2 Theory

    Magnetic susceptibility is a parameter of considerable diagnostic and interpretational use in the study

    of rocks. This is true whether an investigation is being conducted in the laboratory or magnetic fields

    over a terrain are being studied to deduce the structure and lithologic character of buried rock bodies.

    Susceptibility for a rock type can vary widely, depending on magnetic mineralogy, grain size and

    shape, and the relative magnitude of remanent magnetization present, in addition to the induced

    magnetization from the Earths weak field.

    The physical background for the existence of magnetic behavior in minerals is the magnetic moment

    produced by electrons orbiting their nucleus and spinning around their axis. Magnetism is controlled by

    the inherent forces or energies created by electrons which make up atoms. Electrons spin around their

    axis, and also around the atoms nucleus in their own orbits. Spins within spins, analogous to the orbit

    of the Earth round the Sun whilst spinning on its axis. The way in which different electrons motions

    are aligned determines the total magnetic energy or moment of the atom. Different atoms have different

    numbers of electrons and types of motion. Atoms make up molecules and molecules make up materials,

    so that the overall type of magnetic behaviour of a rock mineral is defined by the configuration and

  • interactions of all the electron motions in all its atoms.

    In many types of material the overall magnetic moment is zero because the orbital and spin components

    even out. When a mineral with zero magnetic moment is placed in a magnetic field the electron

    motions will rearrange so that the net magnetic moment is in the direction opposite to the applied field.

    These types of minerals are called diamagnetic. In contrast, when minerals with a small net magnetic

    moment get subjected to a magnetic field the electrons will attempt to line up in the direction of the

    magnetic field. These types of minerals are called paramagnetic. In some minerals, the interaction

    between electron spin and orbital movement in adjacent atoms causes these minerals to behave as

    active magnets. These types of minerals are called ferromagnetic when all magnetic moments line up in

    the same direction, or ferrimagnetic, when one third of the magnetic moments line up in the opposite

    direction. A special group of minerals are those in which the electron interaction leads to magnetic

    moments being aligned in opposite directions. These minerals with a net magnetic moment of zero are

    called antiferromagnetic. (Thompson and Oldfield, 1986).

    When there is no external magnetic field, individual magnetic zones ("magnetic domains") within

    rocks, soils or other materials will generally be oriented randomly. The net effect would be a zero

    magnetic field. However, when the material is in the presence of an external magnetic field such as

    Earths field, the individual magnetic domains become more or less aligned, resulting in a net non-zero

    field. This is a secondary field distinct from, but caused by, the Earths field.

    The strength of this so-called "induced" magnetisation is called the "dipole moment per unit volume",

    m. It is related to the external magnetic field's strength, H, by

    m = KH.

    Magnetic susceptibility is therefore the property of a material which determines how much

    magnetization will be present due to an external magnetic field.

    K = m/H

  • It is effectively the ratio of the magnetisation effect to the applied magnetic field. Susceptibility K is a

    dimensionless number related to the number of individual magnetic dipoles in the medium that can be

    aligned with the main field.

    Rocks and minerals may retain magnetization after the removal of an externally applied field, thereby

    becoming permanent weak magnets. This property is known as remanent magnetization and is

    manifested in different forms, depending on the magnetic properties of the rocks and minerals and their

    geologic origin and history.

    The concept of hysteresis is therefore fundamental when describing and comparing the magnetic

    properties of rocks. Hysteresis is the variation of magnetization with applied field and illustrates the

    ability of a material to retain its magnetization, even after an applied field is removed.

    Generally there are three magnetic effects that impact the (electro)magnetic characteristics of the

    subsurface, and thus electromagnetic sensors:

    (1) remanent magnetization,

    (2) induced magnetization, and

    (3) viscous remanent magnetization.

    Remanent magnetization Remanent magnetization exists in the absence of an applied field. The

    remanent magnetization must be added to any magnetization effects resulting from an applied magnetic

    field. Remanent magnetization occurs within ferromagnetic and ferromagnetic minerals that have a

    natural alignment of the magnetic moments. This type of magnetization directly affects magnetic

    sensors

    Induced magnetization Induced magnetization results from a magnetic field being applied to a

    magnetically susceptible object. In the low-intensity field region, the net magnetic moment (i.e., the

    magnetization, m) is proportional to the strength of the applied field (H). Therefore, the low-field

    magnetic susceptibility, defined as the ratio of the magnetization over the field strength, is a material-

  • specific property. The magnetic susceptibility is either expressed per unit volume (volume-specific

    susceptibility, ) or per unit mass (mass-specific susceptibility, ). Induced magnetization can be

    measured by applying a magnetic field to a sample (in the laboratory or in the field). By measuring the

    difference between this primary magnetic field and the secondary magnetic field one can determine the

    material specific magnetic susceptibility. The magnetic induction of a sample, measured by a magnetic

    or electromagnetic sensor, is the sum of all the different entities of induced magnetization, weighed for

    volume, distance to the sensor, and magnitude of the susceptibility.

    Viscous remanent magnetisation Viscous remanent magnetization refers to the effect that the

    secondary magneticfield gets delayed relative to the primary magnetic field (Thompson &

    Oldfield,1986).

  • Chapter Two (2)

    2.1 Project Site

    The experimental site can be located close to the Great Hall of the Kwame Nkrumah University

    of Science and Technology in Kumasi Ghana. It features a tropical wet and dry climate, with

    relatively constant temperatures throughout the course of the year. The estimated area of the

    site is approximately (250*200)m2. The topography of the land is characterized by high and

    low lands and generally slopes down at the west. The project site is covered by grass and with a

    canopy created by various tree species.

    Illustration 1: Project site marked X

  • 2.2 Data Acquisition

    In taking the measurements, focus was placed on induced magnetization (magnetic

    susceptibility) using the MS2D field loop sensor. The instrument; Bartington MS2 Susceptibility

    System consists of a meter that can is attached to a sensor (loop sensor). The meter expresses magnetic

    susceptibility in either cgs (centimetre, gram, second) or SI (standard international) units. SI was used

    throughout the field measurements. The MS2D search loop sensor is a field sensor, 185 mm in

    diameter, designed to make surface measurements. The sensor contains a coil that generates an AC

    magnetic field and allows for the bulk susceptibility of a circular area approximately 200mm

    Diameter to be quickly measured.

    Two sensitivity positions are provided with the instrument: range 1 or 0.1. Accuracy on the

    order of 1.0 x 105 SI can be obtained with a 1-s measurement cycle (1 range) and an accuracy

    of 0.1 x 105 SI with the 10-s cycle (0.1 range). The Zero (Z) and Measure (M) functions are

    selected on a three-position toggle switch. Measurements are displayed on a four-digit LCD

    panel and were taken on the 0.1 range which takes about 10s.

    Illustration 2: MS2 meter Illustration 3: MS2D sensor (loop)

  • Field Procedure

    Magnetic objects worn by the surveyor can affect the data and was therefore removed before

    collecting data. Also, as a precaution the battery was checked to make sure there was enough

    power to give accurate and reliable measurements.

    1. The MS2 Meter is carried in a shoulder bag for ease of use on the field

    2. After proper assembling of the instrument, a zero operation is performed whilst holding the

    probe at least 1m from all objects (in the air) by pressing the Z button.

    3. The sensor is placed on the surface (ground) and measurement is triggered with the M button

    which takes about 10s with a beep which indicates end. The reading is recorded and the GPS

    point taken.

    4. Measurements were taken at irregular intervals in a grid-like manner.

  • Chapter three (3)

    3.1 Results

    The results gathered from the field was entered into spreadsheet application for further processing of

    the data. Below is the results obtained;

    Magnetic Susceptibility x10-5 Northing Westing

    32.8 657797 737981

    27.6 657789 737981

    50.7 657775 737980

    20.2 657757 737981

    19.3 657736 737984

    707.9 657713 737980

    44.1 657668 737981

    15.2 657626 737981

    16 657576 737980

    6 657560 737982

    6 657531 737978

    18.6 657530 737942

    36.6 657537 737939

    33.6 657575 737930

    19.3 657607 737912

    5.7 657629 737914

    19.7 657658 737906

    62.3 657686 737911

    25.2 657708 737914

    12.3 657744 737913

    10.3 657762 737909

    66.3 657778 737883

  • 28.8 657751 737847

    78.6 657727 737827

    74.6 657706 737843

    38.3 657674 737851

    11 657645 737856

    44 657607 737869

    38.8 657579 737868

    24.8 657558 737881

    16.4 657531 737886

    15.1 657507 737885

    25.5 657498 737821

    44.5 657528 737819

    15.5 657559 737820

    50.6 657582 737816

    67.1 657602 737810

    32 657618 737806

    18 657646 737796

    26.1 657695 737793

    16.1 657794 737928

    53.9 657770 737936

    20.7 657746 737942

    15.4 657721 737947

    38.8 657694 737949

    80.6 657658 737953

    116.3 657655 737970

    64.2 657673 737985

    92.7 657626 737957

    21.3 657596 73795