m xrf and m xafs with the gsecars x-ray microprobe

13
20-Jun-2003 XRF and XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe Matthew Newville, Steve Sutton, Mark Rivers, Peter Eng, Tom Trainor Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources (CARS) University of Chicago, Chicago, IL H. K. (Dave) Mao, Carnegie Institute of Washington, HP-CAT Yue Meng, Carnegie Institute of Washington, HP-CAT Chi-Chang Kao, Brookhaven National Lab Wendy Mao, University of Chicago John Mavrogenes, Andrew Berry Australian National University, Canberra, ACT Cu in Quartz Fluid Inclusions at Hydrothermal Conditions High-Pressure C K-Edge X-ray Raman Spectroscopy

Upload: bowie

Post on 19-Jan-2016

63 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Matthew Newville, Steve Sutton, Mark Rivers, Peter Eng, Tom Trainor Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources (CARS) University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. m XRF and m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe. Cu in Quartz Fluid Inclusions at Hydrothermal Conditions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

XRF and XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

Matthew Newville, Steve Sutton, Mark Rivers, Peter Eng, Tom Trainor Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources (CARS) University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

H. K. (Dave) Mao, Carnegie Institute of Washington, HP-CATYue Meng, Carnegie Institute of Washington, HP-CATChi-Chang Kao, Brookhaven National LabWendy Mao, University of Chicago

John Mavrogenes, Andrew BerryAustralian National University, Canberra, ACT

Cu in Quartz Fluid Inclusions at Hydrothermal Conditions

High-Pressure C K-Edge X-ray Raman Spectroscopy

Page 2: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

Advanced Photon Source Undulator APeriod length 3.30 cmNumber of periods 72Length 2.47 m Minimum gap 10.5 mmPower (closed gap) 6 kW Kmax (closed gap) 2.78

Energy Tuning Range: 2.9 - 13.0 keV (1st harmonic) 2.9 - 45.0 keV (3rd and 5th harmonic)

On-axis peak brilliance (at 6.5 keV): 9.6x1018 ph/s/mrad2 /mm2 /0.1%bw

On-axis power density (closed gap): 167 kW/mrad2

Source Size and Divergence:Vert: = 16m, ’ = 4radHoriz: = 240m, ’ = 14rad

Page 3: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

GSECARS Beamline Layout and Optics

Undulator Beamline: High collimation allows efficient focusing, for x-ray microprobe,

and x -ray diffraction (small crystals, high pressure).

Bending Magnet Beamline: 2nd-generation source, with high energy x-rays (up to 100KeV)

Storage Ring, undulator

High Pressure Station: Diamond-Anvil-Cell Large Volume Press

Monochromator: LN2-cooled Si (111) Energy range: 4.5 –

40keV

Large Focusing Mirrors: 1m KB pair

X-ray Microprobe: XAFS, XRF, fluorescence tomography

BM Station: tomography, diffraction, DAC, Large Volume Press, bulk XAFS

Diffractometer: surface diffraction inelastic scattering

GeoSoilEnviroCARS: Sector 13, APS, Argonne National Lab

Page 4: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

Focusing: Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors: Rh-coated Si, typically using 3x3m spot sizes, at 50mm from end of mirrors.

Incident Beam:LN2 cooled Si (111)

Sample Stage: x-y-z stage, 1m resolution

Fluorescence detector: 16-element Ge detector / DXP electronics, Lytle Detector, or Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometer

Data Collection:Flexible, custom software for X-Y XRF mapping, and XAFS, based on EPICS.

Optical Microscope:5x to 50x objective to external video system / webcam.

GSECARS XRF/XAFS Microprobe Station

Slits: typically 200 to 300 m, accepting ~20% of undulator beam at50m from source.

Page 5: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

The table-top Kirkpatrick-Baez mirrors use four-point benders and flat, trapezoidal mirrors to dynamically form an ellipsis. They can focus a 300x300m beam to 1x1m - a flux density gain of 105.

With a typical working distance of 100mm, and an energy-independent focal distance and spot size, they are ideal for micro-XRF and micro-EXAFS.

We use Rh-coated silicon for horizontal and vertical mirrors to routinely produce 2x3m beams for XRF, XANES, and EXAFS.

Kirkpatrick-Baez Focusing Mirrors

Page 6: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

16 element Ge Detector: energy resolution ~250 eV, which separates most fluorescence lines, and allow a full XRF spectrum (or the windowed signal from several lines) to be collected in seconds.

Limited in total count rate (to ~250KHz), so multiple elements (10 to 30) are used in parallel. Detection limits are at the ppm level for XRF. XANES and EXAFS measurements of dilute species (~10ppm) in heterogeneous environments can be measured.

X-ray Fluorescence Detectors

Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometer has much better resolution (~20eV), and much smaller solid angle, but can be used for XAS, is able to separate fluorescence lines that overlap with a Ge detector.

Page 7: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

John Mavrogenes, Andrew Berry (Australian National University)

Hydrothermal ore deposits are important sources of Cu, Au, Ag, Pb, Zn, and U.

Metal complexes in high-temperature, high-pressure solutions are transported until cooling, decompression, or chemical reaction cause precipitation and concentration in deposits.

To further understand the formation of these deposits, the nature of the starting metal complexes need to be determined.

XRF andXAFS are important spectroscopic tools for studying the chemical speciation and form of these metal complexes in solution.

This is challenging to do at and above the critical point of water (22MPa, 375oC).

Fluid inclusions from hydrothermal deposits can be re-heated and used as sample cells for high temperature spectroscopies.

Natural Cu and Fe-rich brine / fluid inclusions in quartz from Cu ore deposits from New South Wales, Australia were examined at room temperature and elevated temperatures by XRF mapping and XAFS.

Metal Speciation in Hydrothermal Fluid Inclusions

100m

Page 8: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

Linkham TS1500 Heating Stage.

Normally, this can easily heat to 1200C for optical microscopy. We had to take off most of the protective front plates to cut down on background Cu and Fe fluorescence.

In the end, we ran the quartz inclusion samples in air, with water flowing, but no heat shielding.

Hydrothermal Fluid Inclusion Measurements

Page 9: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

Understanding the metal complexes trapped in hydrothermal solutions in minerals is key to understanding the formation of ore deposits.

Cu 25oC

Cu 495oC

Fe 25oC

Fe 495oC

65m

Natural Cu and Fe-rich brine and vapor-phase fluid inclusions in quartz from Cu ore deposits were examined at room temperature and elevated temperatures by XRF mapping and EXAFS.

Initial Expectation: chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) would be precipitated out of solution at low temperature, and would dissolve into solution at high temperature. We would study the dissolved solution at temperature.

Cu speciation in Hydrothermal Fluid Inclusions

XRF mapping (2m pixel size) showed that for large vapor-phase inclusions, a uniform distribution of Cu in solution at room temperature was becoming less uniform at temperature. This was reversible, and seen for multiple inclusions.

XRF Mapping

Page 10: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

These results are consistent with Fulton et al [Chem Phys Lett. 330, p300 (2000)] study of Cu solutions near critical conditions: Cu2+ solution at low temperature, and Cu1+ associated with Cl at high temperatures.

Cu XANES: Speciation in Fluid Inclusions

XAFS measurements at low and high temperature for the vapor-phase inclusiong were also very different, with a very noticeable differences in the XANES:

Low temp: Cu2+ , aqueous solution

High temp: Cu1+ , Cl or S ligand.

Page 11: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

Cu XAFS in Fluid Inclusions

Cu2+

O

O

2.35Å

1.96Å

Cl

2.09Å

Cu1+

Low temp High temp

EXAFS from the high temperature phase.

Fit to high-temperature (450C) Cu solution in fluid (vapor phase) inclusion: can get good fits with 1 Cl at ~2.09Å and 1 O at ~2.00Å, or 2 Cl at ~2.08Å. This is also consistent with the model of for aqueous Cu1+ of Fulton et al,

J. A. Mavrogenes, A. J. Berry, M. Newville, S. R. Sutton, Am. Mineralogist 87, p1360 (2002)

Page 12: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

- 6-element Si (440) Crystal Analyzer- Kappa Diffractometer- Large Beamline KB mirrors, giving ~1013ph/s at 10keV in a 20x80m spot.

Ideal for inelastic x-ray scattering in a Diamond Anvil Cell, including XANES-like information from X-ray Raman measurements.

Inelastic X-ray Scattering: X-ray Raman

DAC sample, lead-covered detector

Analyzer Crystals: Si (440) 870mm Rowland circle

Page 13: m XRF and  m XAFS with the GSECARS X-ray Microprobe

20-Jun-2003

There is very little spectroscopic study of the phase transitions from graphite hcp C fcc C (diamond).

Here is preliminary X-ray Raman measurements on graphite in a Diamond Anvil Cell (yes, background diamond is a possibility!)

X-ray Raman: high pressure carbon