luca dassa – 23/03/2015 1 / 9 crab cavities meeting stress linearization analysis performed on the...
DESCRIPTION
Luca Dassa – 23/03/ / 9 CRAB cavities meeting FEM (3) Path f = 70 MPaTRANSCRIPT
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 1 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
Stress linearization• Analysis performed on the sub-model (with previous remarks)• I think that in any case the main considerations are the same
FEM (1)
From test performed on material EDMS 1493400 -> Rp0.2 = 70 MPa
Standard FEM strength assessmentAccording to EN 13445-3:2002 -> f = Rp0.2/1.5 = 47 MPa
Design by analysis – method based on stress categoriesAccording to EN 13445-3:2002 -> 1.5*f = 70 Mpa
What about bending stress? Primary or secondary?I assume that they are primary stress
(𝜎𝑒𝑞 )𝑃𝑚≤ 𝑓
(𝜎𝑒𝑞 )𝑃𝑚+𝑃𝑏≤1.5∗ 𝑓
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 2 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
FEM (2)
Path 1
1.5 f = 70 MPa
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 3 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
FEM (3)Path 2
1.5 f = 70 MPa
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 4 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
FEM (4)Path 3
1.5 f = 70 MPa
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 5 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
FEM (5)
Conclusions:• Standard FEM strength assessment: NOT VERIFIED• Design by analysis – method based on stress categories: NOT VERIFIED
Design by analysis – Direct Route-> material constitutive law: linear-elastic ideal-plastic-> very complicate strength assessment
Should we go with strength assessment according to “Design by analysis – Direct Route“ ?
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 6 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
Galling
Galling on bolts• It seems that galling could be a problem, above all with super-clean bolts• Coating on Ti bolt never requested at CERN (phone call with M. Malabaila)• threaded inserts? (available in stainless steel and Nitronic 60 (Jeweka))
M6x1 L=9 mm available• A possible solution that we´ve researched only at present, is hardening the
Titanium Grade 5 surface of the fasteners by making use of Ion Implantation. Kolsterizing this material is not possible, but the results I´ve seen on paper from Ion Implantation look promising. Advantage of this message is, that it´s not a coating that can come off and produce particles.
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 7 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
Washers: another possibility?
Washers
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 8 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
Tests on bolts: works in progress
Test on bolts
Luca Dassa – 23/03/2015 9 / 9CRAB cavities meeting
HSE meeting
Meeting with HSE (C. Arregui Rementeria) on 20/03/2015:
• What has been stated by HSE in the past is not anymore valid• Voltage in the cavity is not a reason to be out of the scope of PED directive,
as well the exotic materials• The equipment should be CE marked!• Since we are dealing with category 1 equipment, an exemption could be
discussed, but it shall be supported by valid reasons