lpnhe – université de paris vi & vii babar france. orsay 20 novembre 2003
DESCRIPTION
B - DK* - K s p - CP=+/-1. Physique Analyse K+K- Analyse CP=-1 Perspectives. LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003 Guillaume Therin, Jacques Chauveau, Malcolm John Presente par J.C. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII
BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003
Guillaume Therin, Jacques Chauveau, Malcolm John
Presente par J.C.
Collaboration avec Royal Holloway
P. Jackson, T. Mac Mahon, S. Ricciardi
BB- - DK* DK*- - K Kss- -
CP=+/-1CP=+/-1
PhysiquePhysique
Analyse K+K-Analyse K+K-
Analyse CP=-1Analyse CP=-1
PerspectivesPerspectives
![Page 2: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 2
Désintégrations des B en D K(*)http://lpnhe-babar.in2p3.fr/DK
A=A* BB
eiB→D0K
B eiA=A*
B*
A(B- →D
0 K- )
A(B+→D0K+)
K+-
Etats propres de CP
BF ≈ 1.5 x 10-4 BF = 3.8 x 10-2
BF = 3.7 x 10-4
Ks0
Ks0
Ks
KK+
BF ≈ 3 x 10-6
B-bu
cu
su
D0
K-Vcb
Vus
A
b
u
uD0
K-su
c Vub B-
BSC SC
DC CA Mauvais signes
• Triangles GLW• Triangles analogues pour ADS• Violation de CP directe,…• ou pas de violation de CP
• Objectif : Contraindre par des canaux sans pingouins.• Méthodes : • GLW prototype, faisable ?, amplitudes très différentes
• ADS très faibles rapports de branchement , amplitudes du même ordre.
Belle : A1 = -0.02+-0.33+-0.07
![Page 3: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 3
Analyse CP=+1
• Run 1 et 2 D0 -> K+K-
• Comparaisons données Monte Carlo
• Optimisation des coupures
• Statistiques attendues pour une expérience complètement simulée (FSE)
– Signal
– Bruits de fond
– bruit de fond doublement piquant
![Page 4: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 4
Data Sets
Data Sample Luminosity (fb-1)
00BB
BB 188
184
1250*
16400
CP Cocktail
KK Signal
93.4uds
92.9c
• We have all generic SP4 reconstructed with release 10
• Both data and generic MC taken from the Breco skims
• Enough generic to do a full simulated Experiment
• All yields are normalised to 73.4 fb-1-1
• We have all generic SP4 reconstructed with release 10
• Both data and generic MC taken from the Breco skims
• Enough generic to do a full simulated Experiment
• All yields are normalised to 73.4 fb-1-1
73.4On-Peak Data
8.6Off-Peak Data
![Page 5: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 5
Cut Optimization
Assumptions :
Method :
Assumptions :
Method :
• Cut variables uncorrelated with mes and E (checked).
• Good agreement between MC and Data
• For the optimization, mes is assumed to be uniform (BKGD) for (5.2 < mes < 5.29) GeV/c2
• Determine - NSIGNAL (signal MC)
- NBKGD (generic udscb)
found in the signal boxsignal box
E (
MeV
)
5.29MES (GeV/c2)
5.20 5.27
40
-40
BF(signal) = 7.10-7
![Page 6: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 6
No appreciable correlations between DE and All other cuts
Plots done on data with mes < Plots done on data with mes < 5.275.27
Plots done on data with mes < Plots done on data with mes < 5.275.27
![Page 7: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 7
Plots done on Data with |Plots done on Data with |E| > 0.04E| > 0.04Plots done on Data with |Plots done on Data with |E| > 0.04E| > 0.04
No appreciable correlations between mes and All other cuts
![Page 8: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 8
Off-peak data compared with generic udsc
Fair agreement between data and new qq MCFair agreement between data and new qq MCFair agreement between data and new qq MCFair agreement between data and new qq MC
![Page 9: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 9
On-peak data compared with generic
mmeses < 5.27 GeV < 5.27 GeVmmeses < 5.27 GeV < 5.27 GeV
![Page 10: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 10
Significance versus cut variations
• The vertical black The vertical black bar shows the choice bar shows the choice for the cutfor the cut
• favored loose cutsfavored loose cuts
• The vertical black The vertical black bar shows the choice bar shows the choice for the cutfor the cut
• favored loose cutsfavored loose cuts
![Page 11: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 11
Cut Optimization plots
Signal Bcgk
![Page 12: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 12
Cut Values
cutLegendre Fisher|Cos Bmom|
|Cos HEL D0|
|Cos HEL K*|
Mass K*
Mass D0 (s= 6 MeV)Mass Ks (s= 3 MeV)
DOF Ks
PID daughs D0
BKGD B+B-BKGD B0B0BKGD udsBKGD cTotal BackgroundSignalS/sqrt(S+B)opt
value
> 0.35< 75 MeV
0.60.95
15 MeV7 MeV
NotaPion
-
1.5 ± 0.2
0.2 cm
2.2 ± 0.2
1.7 ± 0.04
14.3 ± 0.77.9 ± 0.2
3.6 ± 0.47.0 ± 0.5
MC Signal MC Signal = 16.4 = 16.4 0.4 0.4 % %
MC Signal MC Signal = 16.4 = 16.4 0.4 0.4 % %
Legendre Fisher : Legendre Fisher :
F = 0.53 - 0.60*L0 + 1.27*L2F = 0.53 - 0.60*L0 + 1.27*L2
Legendre Fisher : Legendre Fisher :
F = 0.53 - 0.60*L0 + 1.27*L2F = 0.53 - 0.60*L0 + 1.27*L2
Best Candidate :Best Candidate :
2(m(mD0D0,m,mKsKs))
14.5% selected 14.5% selected events have events have more than 1 more than 1 candidate candidate
Best Candidate :Best Candidate :
2(m(mD0D0,m,mKsKs))
14.5% selected 14.5% selected events have events have more than 1 more than 1 candidate candidate
![Page 13: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 13
Full Simulated Experiment (1) Full Simulated Experiment (1)
DataData
• Full Simulated Experiment :
• normalised to the data (73.4 fb-1)
• BF(signal) = 7.10-7
• Full Simulated Experiment :
• normalised to the data (73.4 fb-1)
• BF(signal) = 7.10-7
BB- - D D00K*K*- - KKss- - KK++KK- -
FSEFSE
![Page 14: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 14
Échantillons de contrôle
• Échantillons
– D pi avec D-> K pi
– D pi avec D-> K K
• Différence entre MC et données
– Facteurs d’échelle
– shifts paramètres pour le fit sur les données
• correction d’efficacité des coupures
![Page 15: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 15
E parameterization
Control samples (1) Control samples (1)
= 1.0 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
s = 10.8 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
BB- - D D- -
KK++--
BB- - DK* DK*- - K Kss- -
KK++KK--
BB- - D D- -
KK++KK--
= -0.2 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
s = 15.9 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
= -0.5 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
s = 15.7 ± 0.3 MeV± 0.3 MeV
= -3.5 ± 1.0 MeV± 1.0 MeV
s = 18.6 ± 1.0 MeV± 1.0 MeV
= -4.3 ± 0.6 MeV± 0.6 MeV
s = 16.6 ± 0.6 MeV± 0.6 MeV
MC
M
C
MC
M
C
Dat
Dat
a
a
Dat
Dat
a
a
![Page 16: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 16
mes parameterization
Control samples (2) Control samples (2)
BB- - D D- -
KK++--
BB- - DK* DK*- - K Kss- -
KK++KK--
BB- - D D- -
KK++KK--
=5279.28±0.06 MeV±0.06 MeV
s = 2.50 ± 0.05 MeV± 0.05 MeV
=2579.26±0.03 MeV±0.03 MeV
s = 2.50 ± 0.03 MeV± 0.03 MeV
=5279.14±0.04 MeV±0.04 MeV
s = 2.51 ± 0.03 MeV± 0.03 MeV
=5279.88±0.1MeV±0.1MeV
s= 2.6 ± 0.1 MeV± 0.1 MeV
e = 5290.8 ± 0.6 MeVe = 5290.8 ± 0.6 MeV
=5279.87 ± 0.09 MeV± 0.09 MeV
s= 2.56 ± 0.07 MeV± 0.07 MeV
e= 5290.6 ± 0.9 MeVe= 5290.6 ± 0.9 MeV
MC
M
C
MC
M
C
Dat
Dat
a
a
Dat
Dat
a
a
![Page 17: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 17
Systematic errors :
Only for run 1 &2 and SP4
• Tracking, Ks and PID efficiencies taken from analog analyses in AWG
Correction factors due to Data/MC mismatch carefully studied
o Fit parameters and stability yet to be done. • Yields : Efficiency Errors (%)
Monte Carlo statistics - 2.2
• Tracking efficiency (3GTVL&CT)D Ks -
3*1.3=4D(K pi)K* 0.96 3*0.8=2.4
• Ks efficiency 0.98 3• Kaon ID - 2 Correction factors for cuts Peaking background (below)o Fit parameters
• Asymmetry : Charge asymmetry tracking/PID - 0.3
• BR : B counting 1.1 % - 1.1 Branching fractions (from Ks)[PDG] - 0.39
Only for run 1 &2 and SP4
• Tracking, Ks and PID efficiencies taken from analog analyses in AWG
Correction factors due to Data/MC mismatch carefully studied
o Fit parameters and stability yet to be done. • Yields : Efficiency Errors (%)
Monte Carlo statistics - 2.2
• Tracking efficiency (3GTVL&CT)D Ks -
3*1.3=4D(K pi)K* 0.96 3*0.8=2.4
• Ks efficiency 0.98 3• Kaon ID - 2 Correction factors for cuts Peaking background (below)o Fit parameters
• Asymmetry : Charge asymmetry tracking/PID - 0.3
• BR : B counting 1.1 % - 1.1 Branching fractions (from Ks)[PDG] - 0.39
![Page 18: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 18
Full Simulated Experiment (9 generated events)
Full Simulated Experiment (9 generated events)
Fit Fit on sidebands | on sidebands |E|> 60 MeV, E|> 60 MeV, then fit the fit the same shapesame shape on signal band |on signal band |E|<40 MeVE|<40 MeV
mes (Argus+Gaus)
= 5.2793 GeV (fixed)
s= 2.5 MeV (fixed)
Endpoint = 5.29 GeVEndpoint = 5.29 GeV (fixed)(fixed)
= 33.4 ± 6.9 (fixed)= 33.4 ± 6.9 (fixed)
Fit Fit on sidebands | on sidebands |E|> 60 MeV, E|> 60 MeV, then fit the fit the same shapesame shape on signal band |on signal band |E|<40 MeVE|<40 MeV
mes (Argus+Gaus)
= 5.2793 GeV (fixed)
s= 2.5 MeV (fixed)
Endpoint = 5.29 GeVEndpoint = 5.29 GeV (fixed)(fixed)
= 33.4 ± 6.9 (fixed)= 33.4 ± 6.9 (fixed)
EE (P1+Gaus) mes > 5.27 GeV
= 1 MeV (fixed)
s = 10.8 MeV (fixed)
EE (P1+Gaus) mes > 5.27 GeV
= 1 MeV (fixed)
s = 10.8 MeV (fixed)
8.2 ± 3.8 events± 3.8 events8.2 ± 3.8 events± 3.8 events 5.1 ± 3.6 events± 3.6 events5.1 ± 3.6 events± 3.6 events
slope = -1.1 ± 1.0slope = -1.1 ± 1.0 slope = -1.1 ± 1.0slope = -1.1 ± 1.0
![Page 19: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 19
D0(K+ K-) K*-(Ks pi-) [FSE]
2D fit with fixed gaussian parameters
8.7+3.9-3.2
for 9.0 generated events
1D 1D
![Page 20: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 20
Peaking Background
• BK*KK
• BD0Ks
• BD*K*
• BK*KK
• BD0Ks
• BD*K*
Data sampleData sample fitting A+G(mes) counting fitting A+G(mes) counting
Generic B+B-Generic B+B- 3.2 +/- 1.43.2 +/- 1.4 4.7 +/- 1.4 (2.7 4.7 +/- 1.4 (2.7 K*KK)K*KK)
Generic B0B0Generic B0B0 0.0 +/- 0.20.0 +/- 0.2 0.4 +/- 0.4 0.4 +/- 0.4
CP CocktailCP Cocktail - - 1.3 1.3
K*KK Signal MC (BR 10K*KK Signal MC (BR 10-5-5) ) - - 1.1 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/- 0.1
Data sampleData sample fitting A+G(mes) counting fitting A+G(mes) counting
Generic B+B-Generic B+B- 3.2 +/- 1.43.2 +/- 1.4 4.7 +/- 1.4 (2.7 4.7 +/- 1.4 (2.7 K*KK)K*KK)
Generic B0B0Generic B0B0 0.0 +/- 0.20.0 +/- 0.2 0.4 +/- 0.4 0.4 +/- 0.4
CP CocktailCP Cocktail - - 1.3 1.3
K*KK Signal MC (BR 10K*KK Signal MC (BR 10-5-5) ) - - 1.1 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/- 0.1
Estimated peaking BGCK : 3.2 +/- 1.4 +/- ? (unknown BR)
Estimated peaking BGCK : 3.2 +/- 1.4 +/- ? (unknown BR)
K*KK signal MCK*KK signal MC
Will be studied on data
![Page 21: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 21
Outlook (CP=+1)
• Finish Finish BAD 697BAD 697 v1 on run 1 & 2 data. No request to unblind. v1 on run 1 & 2 data. No request to unblind.
• Ntuple productionNtuple production on reprocessed run 1-to-3 data and SP5 complete. on reprocessed run 1-to-3 data and SP5 complete.
• Cross checkCross check with D with D00 in K in K
• Add Add mode into a common CP+1 analysis mode into a common CP+1 analysis
• UnblindUnblind at the Breco AWG meeting before the Dec. Collab. Meeting at the Breco AWG meeting before the Dec. Collab. Meeting
• Finish Finish BAD 697BAD 697 v1 on run 1 & 2 data. No request to unblind. v1 on run 1 & 2 data. No request to unblind.
• Ntuple productionNtuple production on reprocessed run 1-to-3 data and SP5 complete. on reprocessed run 1-to-3 data and SP5 complete.
• Cross checkCross check with D with D00 in K in K
• Add Add mode into a common CP+1 analysis mode into a common CP+1 analysis
• UnblindUnblind at the Breco AWG meeting before the Dec. Collab. Meeting at the Breco AWG meeting before the Dec. Collab. Meeting
Mes when M(K+K-) in DMes when M(K+K-) in D00 mass sideband (> 4 mass sideband (> 4 ss))
Mes when M(K+K-) in DMes when M(K+K-) in D00 mass sideband (> 4 mass sideband (> 4 ss))
![Page 22: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 22
Analyse CP=-1
First look• Run 1 et 2 D0 -> Ks Phi, Ks pi0
• Comparaisons données Monte Carlo
• Statistiques attendues (FSE)
– Signal
– Bruits de fond
![Page 23: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 23
CP=-1 Ks Phi
coupures non réoptimisées, mais familières
![Page 24: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 24
CP=-1 Ks pi0
![Page 25: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 25
Perspectives
• Tous les ntuples analysis 12, sont produits (presque tous). Avec une fenêtre de +/- 90 MeV sur M_D0.
• Analyse CP=+1 Etude complète du mode K+K- sur run 1-2 • La suite sur run 1-2-3
• Etude du bruit de fond piquant sur les données• Modifications minimes de coupures• Addition du mode pi+ pi-
• Objectif: ouvrir la boite en décembre
• Analyse CP=-1 1er passage présenté.• Résultats + solides en décembre sur le + de modes possibles
• Analyse combinée CP=+/-1• Résultats préliminaires présentables à une conf. d’hiver• PRL d’ici l’été
• En chantier :• D0 K+ pi- et autres modes de mauvais signe• K* K- pi0
![Page 26: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 26
Antisèches
![Page 27: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 27
Control samples (3) Control samples (3)
Study correction factors 5279.87 ± 0.09 5279.26 ± 0.03 1.000116 ± 1.80E-05s 2.56 ± 0.07 2.50 ± 0.03 1.024000 ± 3.06E-02endpoint 5290.6 ± 0.9
-4.3 ± 0.6 -0.2 ± 0.3 21.500000 ± 3.24E+01s 16.6 ± 0.6 15.9 ± 0.3 1.044025 ± 4.26E-02
Scale Factordata MC 5279.87 ± 0.09 5279.26 ± 0.03 1.000116 ± 1.80E-05s 2.56 ± 0.07 2.50 ± 0.03 1.024000 ± 3.06E-02endpoint 5290.6 ± 0.9
-4.3 ± 0.6 -0.2 ± 0.3 21.500000 ± 3.24E+01s 16.6 ± 0.6 15.9 ± 0.3 1.044025 ± 4.26E-02
Scale Factordata MC
5279.88 ± 0.1 5279.14 ± 0.04 1.000140 ± 2.040E-05s 2.6 ± 0.1 2.51 ± 0.03 1.035857 ± 4.172E-02
endpoint 5290.8 ± 0.6
-3.5 ± 1.0 -0.50 ± 0.30 7.000000 ± 4.6519s 18.6 ± 0.1 15.70 ± 0.30 1.184713 ± 0.0235
data MC Scale Factor
5279.28 ± 0.06 5279.89 ± 0.11
s 2.50 ± 0.05 2.56 ± 0.09
1.0 ± 0.3 -3.9 ± 1.17
s 10.8 ± 0.3 11.3 ± 0.5
DataMC
BB- - D D- -
KK++--
BB- - D D- -
KK++KK--
E
m
es
E
m
es
E
m
es
E
m
es
E
E
mes
mes
E
E
mes
mes
E
E
mes
mes
E
E
mes
mes
BB- - DK* DK*- - K Kss- -
KK++KK--
![Page 28: LPNHE – Université de Paris VI & VII BABAR France. Orsay 20 novembre 2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062322/5681519d550346895dbfcf0a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
G. Thérin B->DK* 28
Correction factors Correction factors
efficiency SignalMass D0 0.840 ± 0.046 0.858 ± 0.019 0.978 ± 0.049Fisher 0.894 ± 0.046CosBmom 0.996 ± 0.047 0.997 ± 0.019 0.999 ± 0.051mesDE
correction Factorsefficiency Data