lower vansadhara proejct, stage i, odisha detailed...

244
Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED PROJECT REPORT SECTION –1 1.1 CHECK LIST NAME OF THE PROJECT : LOWER VANSDHARA PROJECT, STAGE-I. LOCATION: Dam on Sana Nadi River near Village Khaira and Barrage on Vansadhara River near Panidangar. a) State (s) : Odisha b) District (s) : Rayagada c) Taluka (s) / Tahasil (s) : Gudari, Ramanaguda, Gumuda, Gunupur, Kashinagar, Paralekhemundi CATEGORY OF THE PROJECT a) Irrigation or Multipurpose : Irrigation b) Storage or Diversion : Storage Check List i

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jun-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

SECTION –1

1.1 CHECK LIST

NAME OF THE PROJECT : LOWER VANSDHARA PROJECT, STAGE-I.

LOCATION: Dam on Sana Nadi River near Village Khaira and Barrage on Vansadhara River near Panidangar.

a) State (s) : Odisha

b) District (s) : Rayagada

c) Taluka (s) / Tahasil (s) : Gudari, Ramanaguda, Gumuda, Gunupur, Kashinagar, Paralekhemundi

CATEGORY OF THE PROJECT

a) Irrigation or Multipurpose : Irrigation

b) Storage or Diversion : Storage

Check List i

Page 2: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

SL. No.

Item : Reference

1 2 : 3 NAME OF THE PROJECT : LOWER VANSDHARA PROJECT,

STAGE - I PLANNING :

1. Has the Master Plan for overall development of the river basin been prepared and stages of basin development discussed briefly?

: Yes

2. Have the alternative proposals been studied and their merits and demerits discussed

: Yes

3. Does the scheme fit in the overall development of the river basin and its priority in the overall development of the basin

: Yes

4. Are there any features which are not likely to fit in the overall development of the basin? Have the other departments concerned with the development been informed?

: No

5. Is the present scheme proposed to be executed in stages? If so, are its various stages of execution and development discussed in the report?

: Yes

6. Are the effect of the scheme on the riparian rights existing upstream and downstream projects etc. discussed

: Yes

INTERSTAT AND INTERNATIONS ASPECTS 7. Are there any international/interstate

issue involved if so, have these issues been identified and present status of agreement indicated specially in respect of:-

: Refer Chapter -3

a) Sharing of water : Yes b) Sharing cost : NA c) Sharing of benefits : NA d) Acceptance of the submergence

by the upstream state(s) : NA

e) Compensation of Land coming under submergence.

: NA

f) Settlement of oustees : NA g) Any other : NA

Note: - If there no agreement, state the present position against each item above. SURVEYS

Check List ii

Page 3: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

8. Have the detailed topographical surveys have been carried out for the following items and maps prepared as per prescribed scales? (Refer Annexure-1)

: Refer Chapter -4 (Survey and Investigation)

a) River surveys : Yes b) Reservoir surveys : Yes c) Head works surveys (Dykes,

Barrage, weirs etc. and auxiliary components)

: Yes

d) Plant site and colonies : Yes e) Canals, branch canals and water

conductor systems : Yes

f) Major canal structure : Yes g) Power house, Switchyard Surge

shafts tail race. : NA

h) Tunnel (s), adits, penstocks etc. : NA i) Surveys (detailed and sample) of

areas of the command for OFD and drainage works.

: Yes

j) Soil surveys : Yes k) Surveys for soil conservation : NA l) Any other surveys i.e.

Archeological right of way communication etc.

: NA

GEOLOGY 9. Have the geological surveys for the

following items been carried out (Refer chapter 4 and Attachment – I and report on geology appended.)

: (Refer Chapter-4 (Survey and Investigation) and Chapter-6 and report on Geology appended)

a) Regional geology (available from geohydrological report).

: Yes

b) Reservoir : Yes c) Head works and energy dissipation

area : Yes

d) Power house and appurtenances : NA e) Intake and regulators : Yes f) Major canal regulators : Yes g) Tunnel(s), penstock hill etc. : NA h) Communication routes : No i) Any other : No

10 a) Has the seismicity of the region been studied and co-efficient of vertical / horizontal acceleration for the various structures discussed?

: No

Check List iii

Page 4: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

b) Has the approval of the standing committee for recommending design of seismic co-efficient for river valley project been obtained?

: No

FOUNDTION INVESTIGATIONS : 11. Have the detailed foundation

investigations including insitu tests and laboratory for the following structures been carried out (refer chapter 4 and Attachment- I) and detailed project report (s) appended?

(Refer Chapter-4 (Survey and Investigation) and Chapter-6 and report on Geology appended)

a) Earth and rock fill dam/barrage / weir etc.

: Yes

b) Masonary/concrete dam/ barrage / weir etc.

: Yes

c) Canal : NA d) Power house, tunnel(s) / canal : NA e) Any other : NA

12. Any other special features affecting the designs?

: No

MATERIAL SURVEYS : 13. Have the surveys and laboratory tests

for the following construction materials been carried out (Refer chapter- 4 and Attachment - I and report(s) appended)?

: Yes

a) Soils for impervious semi-pervious and pervious zones of earth dam.

: Yes

b) Land : Yes c) Rock and aggregate : Yes d) Brick and tiles : NA e) Puzzolana : NA f) Cement & limestones NA g) Steel : NA h) Other scarce materials : NA i) Any other : NA

14. Have the sources for each of above materials been identified and need etc. indicated?

: Yes

15. Have the proposal for procurement of scarce materials been indicated

: No

Check List iv

Page 5: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS:

16. Have the hydrological and Meteorological investigations been carried out and status to date discussed in report?

: No

a) Rainfall b) Gauge c) Discharge d) Sediment e) Water quality f) Evaporation & whether the above

data has been appended

HYDROLOGY : Refer Chapter – 5, Hydrology 17. Is the hydrology dealt with in detail in

a separate volume (attached as appendix – III)?

: No

a) Have the brief details been included in the report?

: NA

b) Is an index map and barchart showing locations of various hydrometric, climatic and rainfall stations and the data availability at those stations been attached?

: No

c) Are brief notes about quality consistency processing and gap filling of the data included?

: Yes

18. Have hydrological studies been carried out for the following

a) To establish the availability of water for the benefits envisaged.

: Yes

b) To determine design flood for the various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.)

: Yes

19. Have the analysis for the water flows, sediment flows, evaporation and command area rainfall been discussed?

Yes

20. Have the studies regarding reservoir sedimentation been carried out and revised elevation area capacity curves been used in the simulation studies (working table)?.

: Yes

21. Have the other requirements such as low flow augmentation, water quality control etc. been included in the project report and incorporated in the simulation studies?

Yes

Check List v

Page 6: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

22. a) Have the details of the simulation (working tables) and conclusion arrived from the various alternatives explaining the factors and assumptions been included and discussed?

: Yes

c) Have the number of failures for different aspects been indicated

: Yes

23 Have the likely desirable and undesirable changes in the hydrological regime due to the project been brought out in the report?

: No

24. Is the criteria adopted for selection of the constructions diversion flood discussed?

Yes

25. Is the basis for fixing up the storage discussed?

: Yes

26. Have the flood routing studies been carried out?

: Yes

27. Have the back water studies been carried out?

: No

LAND ACQUSITION AND RESETTLEMENT OF OUSTEES: 28. Have the type and quantum of land

proposed to be acquired in the submerged area, project area, area coming under canal distribution system area required for rehabilitation of the oustees been detailed?

: No

29. Is the basis for provision for land acquisition indicated?

: No

30. Have the rehabilitation measures amenities and facilities to be provided to the oustees been discussed specially for the oustees from the upstream status?

: No

31. Are the basis of land acquisition for the submerged area upto FRL / MWL etc. discussed?

: No

DESIGN: Refer Chapter – 7, Design Features and Criteria

32. Has the final location of the head works and appurtenance, in preference to the other sites investigated, been discussed?

: No

33. Has the layout of the project area viz. location of head works, work-shop sheds, offices, colonies etc. been

: No

Check List vi

Page 7: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

finalized and discussed? 34. Has the layout of the various major

components of head works been discussed in the light of site feature geology and foundation characteristics etc.?

Yes

35. Have the designs been prepared for the following components and appended in chapters?

a) Earth or rockfill dam masonary or concrete dam spillway, barrage, weir and appurtenances.

: Yes

b) Energy dissipation arrangements, training walls etc.

: Yes

c) Opening through dam-galleries head regulators penstocks other outlets sluice etc.

: Yes

d) Regulators : Yes e) Canals and water conductor system : Yes f) Canals structures : Yes g) Power house, tunnels, surge shaft : No h) Instruments : No

36. Have the assumptions made in the design of above components of the project been indicated and basis of assumption discussed?

: Yes

37. Have any model studies been carried out for location of the dam, spillway and other appurtenances checking the design profile of the spillway, energy dissipation arrangements location of outlets / regulators etc?

: NA(DPR stage only)

38. Has the final alignment of canal(s) and branch canal (s) been discussed in the various alignments studied?

Yes

a) Does the canal design provide for meeting requirements of rush irrigation?

Yes

b) Have any intermediate storage and tail tanks been considered to reduce the canal capacities

: No

39. Is the canal and distribution system being lined and if so, what is the minimum capacity of the channel proposed to be lined?

: Main canal is Unlined and Distribution system is lined.

40. Is the location of canal structure on

: Yes

Check List vii

Page 8: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

main and branch canals fixed after detailed survey of the final alignment?

41. Are the regulation arrangements of the off-taking channel both near and away from the cross regulators discussed?

: Yes

42. Are sufficient escape including terminal, escapes provided on the main/branch canal / distributories/ minors?

: Yes

43. Have the basis for adopting water way for the cross drainage works been discussed?

: Yes

44. Have the proposals for rating the canal section by providing standing wave flumes, rating of the falls, broad crested weirs, V-Notches etc. been discussed for the canal and distribution system?

: Yes

45. Has any model studies for major canal structure (s) been carried out and if, so are the results discussed and incorporated in the design?

: No

IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT 46. Have the conveyance and field

irrigation efficiencies for paddy and up land crops during Kharif, Rabi etc. been indicated, discussed and justified?

Yes

47. Have the weekly/fort nightly crop requirements at the canals worked out?

Yes

48. Are there any proposals for introducing warabandi and if so have these proposals been discussed in the report and sample calculations for a typical distributiory / Minor / Subminor furnished?

No

49. Has the present position of irrigation in the command through existing canals, tanks, lift schemes wells, etc. been brought in the report.

Yes

50. Are the Particulars for minor projects existing /in the command been indicated?

No

51. Are there potential areas, indicating the potential where ground water is available, If so, has the quality of the ground water been indicated

No

Check List viii

Page 9: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

52. Has the quantum of available ground water been assessed indicating the basis for conjunctive use with surface water discussed?

No

53. Have the Semi - detailed soil surveys been carried out for the entire command and soil and land irrigability classifications brought out in the report?

No

54. Is the method used for determining the crop water requirements discussed?

Yes

55. Has the project cropping pattern and justification for the proposed cropping pattern been furnished?

Yes

56. Are the areas and percentage of the C.C.A. that will be irrigated during Kharif, Rabi, Two seasonal, Summer and perennial been indicated?

Yes

57. Is Justification furnished for irrigating perennials and summer crops from the reservoir?

Yes

58. Have the monthly reservoir operation studies been carried out at least for 20 years and summary on annual basis attached?

Yes

59. Have the number of blocks selected for detailed surveys for on farm development (OFD) works including drainage and total area covered by such blocks been indicated?

Yes

60. Have the existing location of the (Trial cum Demonstration Farm) inputs centres (seeds fertilizer and insecticides) in the command been indicated and proposal to strengthening the same discussed?

No

61. Have the arrangements for financing the OFD works and proposals for strengthening the same been discussed?

No

62. Have the agencies responsible for execution of OFD works been identified and simultaneous planning of execution of OFD works alongwith engineering works discussed?

No

63. Has the yearwise phasing of Irrigation development as result of the project

Yes

Check List ix

Page 10: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

discussed? 64. Is the existing communication system

within command area sufficient to meet the requirement after full development of irrigation?

Yes

65. If not, have the new proposals been planned and discussed? Is the adequacy of the marketing centers in the command area and new proposals to meet the requirements after full development of irrigation been discussed?

NA

FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE

66. Have the various flood control components of the multipurpose project been indicated?

NA

67. Have the drainage areas been identified and flood intensities worked out at each of the drainage centre which gets affected?

NA

68. Have the following aspects been discussed?

a) Flood cushion in the reservoir.

NA

b) Maximum moderated flood out flows over the spillway etc. and its frequency.

NA

c) Safe carrying capacities of the channel below the dam existing and after construction of flood embankment channel improvement, river diversion.

NA

d) Syncronized moderated peak flood due to release(s) from the dam upstream and unintercepted catchment upto the drainage centre.

NA

e) Average annual expenditure incurred on flood relief works.

NA

Check List x

Page 11: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

f) Area and population affected likely to be affected before/after the project.

NA

g) Estimated saving in annual loss of life, property, cattle, crops, etc. (evaluated in terms of money) due to flood control

NA

69. Have the following aspects of drainage been discussed?

a) Surface and sub-surface drain-age problems of the command area with detailed studies on sub-soil water table.

NA

b) Maximum intensity of 1,2 and 3 day rainfall.

NA

c) Deficiencies in farm drains. NA d) Deficiencies in existing natural

drains. NA

e) Proposal for improvement of drainage water logging of the area with criteria.

NA

f) Identification of the area in command which will get benefited due to execution of drainage net work and benefits, thereof in terms of relief from crop damage, increased yields etc.

NA

70 to 78

Navigation NA

79. Power NA

Check List xi

Page 12: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME AND PLANT AND MAN POWER PLANNING 80. Are the major components of work

proposed to be done departmentally or through contractor?

Through Contract

Have the various alternative for construction programme been studied and proper justification furnished for the final programme adopted?

Yes

Has the proposed construction programme been prepared and syncronized for timely completion of each of the major component of work including command area development.

Yes

Have the yearwise quantities of the following materials of construction been worked out for various components of the project.

a) Excavation-soft and hard strata. Yes b) Earth work in filling

imprevious, pervious and semi-pervious.

Yes

c) Rockfill dam toe, riprap etc. NA d) Stone for masonary NA e) Course aggregate concrete. Yes f) Sand filter masonry concrete. No g) Gravel fitter No h) Steel of various sizes and types of

reinforcement. Yes

i) Cement normal slow setting without puzzolana.

No

j) Lime surkhi-puzzolana. No k) Scarce material special steel. No l) Other material fuel electricity No Have the yearwise quantities to be

executed by machine/labour for each of the major component been worked out for each of the above material?

Yes

Have the labour intensive items of the venous major components of the project been identified and the quantities of such items worked out

` Yes

Have the details of the plant and machinery, spares, instruments scarce materials to be imported worked out

No

Check List xii

Page 13: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

and itemwise justified? Has the phasing of imports and

source(s) of import been discussed itemwise.

No

Are the imports under foreign Internal resources to be affected grants/credits or of the country.

No

FINANCIAL RESOURCES Refer Chap-19

a) Has the concurrence of the finance department has been obtained?

No

b) Whether the scheme has already been started? If so, is the present stage of construction indicated?

No

Is the scheme included in the plan? If not, what is the present position regarding including in the plan?

No, May be included in 2013-14 Year

Have the yearwise requirement of fund been indicated

Yes

Is the scheme covered under state sector or Central sector?

State

Is the scheme covered under any foreign assistance / aid agreement?

No

ESTIMATE: Refer Chap-18 of Vol-I or Vol-II Is the separate volume of estimated

attached as appendix? No

Is the year to which the rates adopted in the estimate indicated?

Yes

Have the analysis of rates for various major items of works or the major components of the project been furnished with basis for analysis?

Yes

Are the provisions for the following items made on the basis of sample survey and sub estimate

Yes

a) Distributories, Minors and sub-minors.

Yes

b) Water course Yes c) Drainage No Are the basis for the following

sources of revenue furnished? No

a) Betterment levy and proposal for its recovery.

b) Irrigation cess. c) Crop protection cess d) Cropwise water rates

Check List xiii

Page 14: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

e) Sale of water for village water supply

f) Miscellaneous Have these rates been compared with

the existing rates at the other projects in the state region?

NA

In case the rates are being enhanced has the concurrence of the concerned department (s) been obtained?

NA

Have the organizational set up for the collection of revenue been indicated?

NA

BENEFIT COST RATIO Refer: Chapter 21 Are the allocated cost for following

components of multipurpose project worked and basis furnished?

NA

a) Irrigation b) Power c) Flood control d) Navigation e) Water supply f) Any other Have the various departments state

agreed to the sharing of the above allocated cost?

NA

Have the cropwise benefits been worked out for irrigated and un-irrigated crop being grown before project in consultation with the agriculture department and statement furnished?

Yes

Have the cropwise benefits been worked out for the proposed cropping pattern after the introduction of irrigation in consultation with agriculture department and statement furnished?

Yes

Is the B.C. ratio of irrigation projects acceptable or otherwise justified?

Yes

107 Is the B.C. ratio for flood control projects acceptable or otherwise justified?

: NA

108 Have the following financial return statements been furnished keeping in view the phasing of development?

:

a) Irrigation Yes

Check List xiv

Page 15: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

b) Power NA 109 Are the benefits other then considered

in the B.C. Ratio and financial return statement been justified

: NA

ECOLOGICAL ASPECT Refer: Chap - 17 110 a) Is the area likely to have any of

the following environmental and ecological problems due to the altered surface water pattern and preventive measures discussed

: No

i) Excessive sedimentation of the reservoir.

: No

ii) Waterlogging No iii) Increase in salinity of the ground

water : No

iv) Ground water recharge : Yes v) Health hazard water borne disease,

industrial pollution etc. : No

vi) Submergence of important minerals.

No

vii) Submergence of monuments No viii) Fish culture and aquatic life. Yes ix) Plant life forests Yes x) Life of migratory birds No xi) National park and sanctuaries. No xii) Seismicity due to filling of

reservoir. No

xiii) Any other No b) Has the concurrence of the

Environmental appraisal committee been obtained?

No

COLONIES AND BUILDINGS 111. Has the planning of the

colony building been done keeping in view the ultimate use for optimum utilization to the investment?

No

112. Has an estimate of higher cost made and details of the extent involved been discussed?

No

113. Are the permanent buildings being constructed required for maintenance of the project only?

Yes

114. Can the building other than required for maintenance of the project being constructed be put to some other use at the completion of the project by the

Yes

Check List xv

Page 16: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage I

department or any other agencies? 115. Have the interested been consulted in

of the buildings to requirement later on?

Yes

116. Have the proposal of temporary buildings discussed?

Yes

117. Are the possibilities of these been discussed in

a) planning Yes b) Construction Yes c) Improved agricultural practices No d) Any other No SOIL CONSERVATION

118. Is the need for soil conservation measures in the catchment of the project discussed?

No

Check List xvi

Page 17: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

LOWER VANSADHARA PROJECT, STAGE-I (POINT WISE REPLY /CLARIFICATION RAISED BY THE STATE GOVT. ON THE FEASIBILITY REPORT )

Compliances to the observations of CWC

Reference Letter No & Date of CWC CWC Lr No 1851 dated 15.06.2012 (Hydrology)

Comments Compliances Yield study:

1.The index map showing catchment area, project location , rain gauge stations etc. may be given in the report

The Index map showing the catchment area, project location, rain gauge stations, G & D sites are now furnished in the DPR

2. Both Internal (mass curve, F & T tests etc.) and external consistency of the observed data may be checked before using the same in the analysis. The consistency of G & D data may be checked with the catchment rainfall.

The internal & external consistency of the observed data have been checked before they are used in the analysis. The details pertaining to these checks have been incorporated in the DPR. Further, the consistency of run-off at the gauging stations have been checked with the corresponding catchment rainfall.

3. The water avaibality analysis have been carried out based on residual flows observed at Kashi Nagar G & D sites. Residual flows have been transferred to project sites in the catchment area proposed.

The flows measured at Kashinagar G & D sites is actually taking into consideration all the utilisations taking place in the u/s. Therefore, these flows reduced pro-rata to the project catchment is the most conservative value and may pleasebe accepted. Further, while carrying out the simulation studies the planned utilisations proposed in the areas u/s of the projects have been given due consideration. In this context it is further clarified that catchment area below the proposed Upper Vanshadhara project up to the Barrage only has been considered for assessing the water availability at the Barrage site.

4. Interstate aspects may be got examine in the ISM Directorate, CWC.

The Interstate matters have been got examined by ISM Directorate.

5. The catchment area of Kashinagar G & D sites is quiet large as compared to catchment area up to project locations and therefore it may not be appropriate to use catchment pro rata basis for yield transfer. It is suggested to develop rainfall runoff models at Kashinagar G & D sites or other suitable location and derive yield series at Project locations using rainfall runoff models and project specific weighted average rainfall.

The rain fall run-off co-relation analysis carried out jointly by Andhra Pradesh and Odisha under the guidance of CWC using observed data and corresponding rainfall at Kashinagar have been referred and the net flow at the project site for the monsoon months have been worked out using the same rainfall run-off relationship developed at Kashi Nagar. These are fairly agreement with the flow series adopted in the DPR. The net flow series

Page 18: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

adopted in the DPR is very much on the conservative side and hence it is requested the series may please be approved

5. It is suggested to establish G & D sites at the Project locations at the earliest.

The suggestion of CWC is noted. Action is being initiated by project Authority to establish hydrological observation station at the projectsites and verification of hydrological parameters would be done before the construction stage.

Design Flood Study:

1.In the absence of observed short interval rainfall- runoff data, the unit hydrograph for Sanandi Dam has been derived synthetically and same appears to be in order. However, project authorities are suggested to collect short interval rainfall-runoff data for storm events for validating the unit hydrograph adopted in the study.

As per CWC observation the unit hydrograph at the project site will be developed based on project specific data to have a check over the Unit Hydrograph developed synthetically now before the construction stage.

2) The observed flood peak data as available at kashinagar G& D site has been used to carry out the flood frequency analysis for computing the design flood at proposed barrage site. The catchment area of Kashinagar G&D site and proposed barrage site are significantly different. It is suggested to use Hydro-meteorological approach also for working out100 years return period flood(Design flood) and SPF (Check flood) at barrage site.

As suggested now the design flood studies for the barrage has been carried out by adopting hydro metrological approach. The Standard Project Flood (SPF) worked out accordingly is 11000cumecs. The details of the studies have been suitably incorporated in the chapter on hydrology in the DPR.

3) The PMP value has been taken from PMP atlas for Mahanadi and adjoining river basins as data base of PMP atlas is quite old, it is suggested to carry out project specific storm studies for estimating the design storm value for the project.

The Probable Maximum Storm Studies for the Sana Nadi Dam Catchment has been reviewed andit could be seen the PMP value adopted is reasonable and quitein order. Hence, the study has been retained. It is requested that the studies as done may please be approved.

Sedimentation:

The adopted sedimentation of rate 6 ha-m/100sq.km/year and assessments of zero elevations of 106.05 and 113.25m after 50 year and 100 year respectively appears to be in order.

The Sedimentation studies carried out at the feasibility stage has been accepted and therefore the same has been retained in the DPR.

Page 19: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

'

A water dispute in terms of provisions of Inter-State River Water. Disputes Act, 1956 was raised by Govt. of Orissa in 2006 and following the procedure in the said Act, a Vamsadhara Water Disputes Tribunal has been constituted by MIO Water Resources, Govt. of India in 2010 and water disputes raised by Goy[of Orissa has been referred to the Tribunal for adjudication. In this context, it is to mention here. that MoWR issued guidelines in January, 2006 for gi v ing techno-economic clearance to Projects in a basin where an Inter-State Water Disputes tribunal has been constituted to examine inter-State allocation of water and related issues in abasin. These are given below

The state Government is making effort to reach an agreement between the co-basins state namely Andhra Pradesh to allow Odisha to take up Lower Vansadhara Project. Intimation to this effect would be furnished to the Tribunal for their concurrence.

i) That in a basin where a Tribunal has been constituted for the first time for examining issues relating to inter-State allocation of water, CWC shall not consider its techno-economic clearance except with prior consent of Tribunal concerned ii). Techno-economic and investment clearance could however be considered for those projects; for which an agreement is reached among co-basin States under intimation to the Tribunal. However, neither any agreement an1ong the co-basin States under intimation to the Tribunal nor prior consent of Tribunal is attached with the report in Chapter-3 of Feasibility Report of Lower Vansadhara Project Stage-I. ln view of above, the project cannot be considered for clearance from

Page 20: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Reference Letter No & Date of CWC

Comments Compliances 1. The total water requirement for irrigation has been assessed as 267.Gotvlcum to provide annual irrigation to an area of 298 I 3ha.The average delta thus comes out about 0.90111 which is acceptable for feasibility report. The crop water requirement; may however be done by using Modified Penman Method at DPR stage.

As suggested the crop water requirement has now been calculated using modified PANMAN method and incorporated in the DPR.

CWC Lr No 12/167/2012-PA (S)/794 dated 04.06.2012 (Irrigation Management)

2. The provision for drinking water requirement as well as industrial demand under the project has not been made. It is suggested that provision for the same may be made at the DPR stage for the projected demand of at least 25 to 30 years.

The provision for drinking water and industrial water requirement has now been made as suggested.

3. The evaporation losses have to be quantified and included in the total demand at DPR stage for the projected demand of at least 25 to 30 years.

The evaporation losses have been quantified and included in the total demand as suggested.

4. In the irrigation planning chapter under conclusions para, it is mentioned that, in order to successfully meet the requirement of Rabi crops, it would be necessary either to make conjunctive use of ground water or Sana Darn height and Vansadhara Barrage height is increased in such a way so as to store additional 20MCM and 10MCM respectively. It is suggested that possibility for conjunctive u se of groundwater along with surface water may be explored in consultation with State groundwater Board/CGWB and the same may be considered at the time of preparation of DPR.

The conjunctive use of ground water along with surface water is proposed for meeting the requirement under the project. The availability of ground water in the command has been confirmed.

5. The 75 % dependable yield at Sananadi dam site has been repo1ied as l 78.46Mcum (13.85 TMC). The proposed utilization under LMC command (1 89.2 MCM) is more than the reported 75% dependable yield. Further, the water availability/net 75% dependable yield at proposed Barrage site on Vansadhara River has not been mentioned. The same needs to be established for providing irrigation to the comma nd through right main canal. The net water availability for the project, (after deducting the water demands for U/S &D/S projects and any other reservations including UIS utilization - under proposal of stage-II mentioned in the report) at proposed Dam site on.

75% dependable yield at the barrage site on Vansadhara river has been given in the DPR. 75% dependable yield at the barrage site is 563.7 MCM.

Page 21: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Sananadiriver and at proposed Barrage site on Vansadharariver may be got approved from the Hydrology Directorate of CWC. 6. The project is planned to utilize the water from Vansadhara Basin which is an [nter State River Basin between Odisha and Andhra Pradesh. The views of ISM Di rectorate of CV/C rriay be obtained from the interstate angle in respect of water availability and its proposed utilization under the project.

The ISM Directorate has been requested for clearing the project from interstate angle and effort by the project authority as suggested by ISM Directorate to get the concurrence from the co-basin states namely Andhra Pradesh is being done by the project authority.

Page 22: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

LOWER VANSADHARA PROJECT, ODISHA (POINT WISE REPLY /CLARIFICATION RAISED BY THE STATE GOVT. ON THE DPR )

Comments Reply

• Index Map 1) The main river Vansadhara and its network of tributaries and other streams 2) Catchment area at Sana NadiDam site and Lower Vansadhara Barrage site 3) Reservoir area of Sana Nadi Dam and Pond Area of Lower vansadhara Barrage 4) Command Area served by Sana Nadi Dam and Lower Vansadhara Barrage 5) Alignment of main canal and out fall points in the nearest streams. 6) Location of G& D site and other important features.

The map showing the details such as main river with its network, catchment area of projects, reservoir area of Sana Nadi and Pond area of Lower Vansadhara Project, Command areas of the project, Alignment of main canal and their outfall points and location of G&D sites and other important features are already available in the drawing vol. of the DPR, however an Index map showing the above details as sought is enclosed.

• Pond Level Pond level of the barrage is indicated as 127m in the drawing, whereas in the salient features and working tables, the pond level is indicated as 128m. The correct pond level is to be mentioned.

The pond level of barrage is 128 m accordingly correction is made in the drawing.

• Water Availability The water availability at Lower Vansadhara barrage site is considered on proportionate catchment area basis from the observed flow data at CWC G&D site at Kashinagar on 10-daily basis and is appended at Annexure-5.7. As per CWC guide lines, barrage operation tables should also have been prepared on the basis of 10-daily flows.

Since the working table has been prepared taking both Sana Nadi dam & barrage & there is a storage in the Sana Nadi dam, time unit has been taken as one month.

• Barrage Operation tables It is seen that Operation tables for barrage are prepared on monthly basis as is done reservoir projects (refer annexure-8.2). Is it acceptable to CWC? As per CWC guide lines, operation tables for barrage are to be prepared on 10- daily basis (refer page 76 of CWC guide lines 2010).

Since the working table has been prepared taking both Sana Nadi dam & barrage & there is a storage in the Sana Nadi dam, time unit has been taken as one month.

• Water availability The water availability at Sana Nadi dam site is derived on proportionate catchment area basis from

Page 23: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

the observed flow data at CWC G&D site at Kashinagar on monthly basis and is said to have been appended at annexure-5.6 but not appended to the report. Instead annexure-5.7 is repeated. It is not clear whether 10% of available flows for upstream utilization and 10% of flows for downstream utilization have been earmarked as per guide lines of CWC in arriving at the net available flows.

Ideally, Rainfall-Runoff models should have been developed between the observed runoff and weighted catchment rainfall either at Gunupur or at Kashinagar sites for the monsoon months (June-October) (Please refer comments of CWC vide letter no. 1851 dated 15.06.2012 at page-2, item-V). These models should have been used to generate the yield series at Sana Nadi dam site during monsoon months.

In fact, R-R models have been developed at Kashinagar G&D site by CWC during the yield studies of Vansadhara river jointly done by Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and Odisha under the guidance of CWC during 2007. These models can be used for generating yield series in monsoon months (June to October) using the catchment weighted rainfall att Sana Nadi dam site.

The flows during non-monsoon months (November to May) at Sana Nadi dam site should have been considered from the observed flows during non-monsoon months to the total monsoon flows at Kashinagar on percentage basis. Provision for 10% u/s & 10% d/s utilizations may be kept. Net available yields at the proposed dam site after u/s & d/s utilization can be worked out.

The water availability series for Sana Nadi Dam is furnished now (attached annex 5.6). The mistake taken place by oversight is now thus rectified.

Since, the gauging stations namely Gunupur&Kashinagar are in the d/s of the project location and the flow volume at these sites have been reduced prorata to obtain the flow volumes at the projects namely Panidonger barrage & Sana Nadi dam, the utilisation taking place in the u/s is already taken care of. As far as the mandatory release tothe d/s is concerned, it is to point out that these have been considered while carrying out the simulationstudies. The rainfall runoff model stated to have been developed in CWC jointly by Odisha & A.P. may kindly be provided to us along with up to date rainfall series for the gauged / project catchments to obtain alternative flow series on the basis of updated rainfall series.In this connection, it may however be indicated that the flow volumes at the project sites determined prorata on the basis of measured flow volumes at the gauges sites are on the conservative sites and rainfall run-off modelling may not be needed in this case because observed data is available for reasonably sufficiently long period.

• Sedimentation Studies

The new zero elevation after 100 years of sedimentation has been estimated to be 113.25m. But

Though 100 year new zero elevation is

Page 24: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

the DSL is fixed as 123m. The reasons for fixing the DSL at 123m need to be mentioned in the DPR. Is the DSL fixed on the consideration of command level? If it is so, please mention the highest command level and the reasons for fixing DSL at 123m in the report. The sedimentation studies have been conducted with FRL 132m but the reservoir operation tables were prepared with FRL 133m.

estimated to be 113.25 m, the DSL is fixed as 123 m keeping command considerations

• Reservoir Operation Tables The reservoir operation tables have been prepared with FRL 133m, whereas the FRL indicated in salient features is 132m. In case the reservoir operation tables are run with FRL 133m, the sedimentation studies are to be conducted with FRL 133m and consequently the New Zero Elevation and the revised area capacity at different levels would be different. Reservoir operation tables should be done with FRL 132m or 133m as the case may be aiming at 75% success rate of the project. Accordingly, changes to be made in the salient features / drawings. In the reservoir operation tables, the MDDL is mentioned as 122 m, whereas the salient features indicated that the DSL is 123m. MDDL cannot be lower than DSL fixed on the basis of 100 years sedimentation of reservoir. In the reservoir operation tables, the initial storage at RL 122m is shown as 80 MCM, whereas the capacity at RL 122.98m is shown as 41.22MCM. (Refer Annexure-8.1). It needs some verification as storage capacity at lower level cannot be more than that at higher level. The reservoir operation tables have been prepared separately for each individual year, rather it should have been prepared continuously for all the year i.e., the final reservoir level at the end of any year considered should be equal to the initial reservoir level of the following year and so on. In the light of discussions mentioned above, the reservoir operation tables be verified and freshly prepared. It has been suggested by CWC vide their letter no. 1794 dated 4.6.2012 to make conjunctive use of ground and surface water at the time of preparation of DPR. This aspect needs to be elaborated.

In Chapter-8 Reservoir Simulation of Detailed Project Report it was clearly mentioned under Conclusion that the FRL of reservoir is kept at 133 m for Regulationpurposes taking advantage of sufficient Free Board kept. In the case of good monsoon year FRL may be kept as 132 m only. However, the FRL could be 133 m in the case of bad and normal monsoon years. As a matter of reservoir operation policy it is proposed to keep a storage of 80 MCM in the beginning of June in the reservoir so that the criteria to decide the success of the project can be met to the extent possible. The water level against this capacity is 128.19 m and not 122m.The Simulation table corrected accordingly and enclosed.

Page 25: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

The conclusions given at Chapter-6 under reservoir, needs to be specific with reference to the reservoir operation done indicating clearly the FRL, success rate of project, spills, deficits, water use etc.

• Water Utilization The total water utilization of Sana Nadi dam for irrigation, drinking water, industrial use etc. including evaporation losses may please be mentioned.

These are clearly depicted in the Working Table.

• Design Flood/MWL The Max. Water Level (MWL) has been

fixed keeping 10% of the Gates not operational.

Page 26: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

LOWER VANSADHARA PROJECT, STAGE -I SALIENT FEATURES FOR VANSADHARA BARRAGE

1. LOCATION (a) State Odisha (b) District Rayagada (c) (i) Latitude 19°22’ 53.5” N (d) (ii) Longitude 83° 45’ 39.7” E (e) River River Vansadhara for barrage

(f) Location Barrage Site near Panidonger Village in Rayagada District.

(h) Toposheet E44F/15 and E44F/16 2. HYDROLOGY (a) Catchment Area (km2) 2701 sq.km for barrage (b) Maximum Monsoon Rainfall (mm) Hydrology was based on observed data

at Kashinagar site on Vansadhara river. (c) Minimum Annual Rainfall (mm) (d) Mean Annual Rainfall (mm) (e) 75% Dependable Rainfall of (i) Catchment (mm) (ii) Ayacut (mm) (f) Maximum Design Flood Discharge 11000 m3/s (SPF) 3. POND (a) Bed Level (m) 118 (b) Pond Level(PL) ( m) 128 4. RUNOFF AT THE BARRAGE SITE (a) At 50% dependability ( MCM) 800.5

(b) At 75% dependability ( MCM) 563.7

(c) At 90% dependability ( MCM) 394.8 5. HEAD WORKS A. Barrage (a) Crest level of other barrage bays (m) 119.2 (b) Other Barrage bays (no.) 20 (c) Length of each bays (m) 12 (d) No. of Piers single 18 (e) Thickness of each Pier (m) 2.5 (f) No. of double Pier 1 (g) Thickness of double Piers (m) 5 (i) Height of guide bank (m) RMC side 2.5 (j) Height of guide bank (m) LMC side 6.5 (k) Crest level of under sluice (m) both sides 118.0 (l) No. of under sluice bays RMC sides 3 (m) No. of under sluice bays on LHS 2 (n) Length of under sluice bays (m) both side 11 (o) No. of Piers including fish ladder RMC side 3 (p) No. of Piers LHS side 1 (q) Thickness of each Piers (m) both side 2.5 (r) Length of Barrage (m) 366 (s) Total length of barrage including abutment both

side (m) 368.4

(i)

Page 27: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

6. DISTRIBUTION (a) Length of RBC (km) 36.45 (b) Gross Commandable Area (GCA) of RBC (Ha.) 11,578 (c) Culturable Command Area (CCA) RBC (Ha.) 8105 (d) Percentage of CCA to GCA (%) 70

(e) Length of Gudari Distributary LHS of Panidonger Barrage (km) 9.350

(f) Gross Commandable Area (GCA) of GD (Ha.) 1571 (g) Culturable Command Area (CCA) of GD (Ha.) 1099 (f) Percentage of CCA to GCA (%) 70 (g) Intensity of Irrigation (Kharif) (%) 85 (h) Intensity of Irrigation (Rabi) (%) 71 (i) Intensity of Irrigation (Perennial) (%) 5 (j) Area irrigated during Kharif (Ha.) 7824 (k) Area irrigated during Rabi (Ha.) 6535 (l) Area irrigated during Perennial (Ha.) 460 (m) Annual Irrigation (Ha.) 14819 (n) Average Annual Evaporation (MCM) 2.94 (o) Average Annual Irrigation (MCM) 99.59

(ii)

Page 28: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

LOWER VANSADHARA PROJECT, STAGE – I SALIENT FEATURES FOR SANA NADI DAM

1. LOCATION (a) State Odisha (b) District Rayagada (c) (i) Latitude 19° 8’ 17.4” N (d) (ii) Longitude 83°52’ 39.0” E

(e) River River Sana Nadi for dam, dyke and spillway

(f) Location Dam Site near Khaira Village in Rayagada Distt.

(h) Toposheet E44F/16, E44L/13, E45G/1, E44F/15, E45A/3 and E45A/4

2. HYDROLOGY (a) Catchment Area (km2) 1205 for dam (b) Maximum Monsoon Rainfall (mm) Hydrology was based on observed data

at Kashinagar site on Vansadhara river (c) Minimum Annual Rainfall (mm) (d) Mean Annual Rainfall (mm) (e) 75% Dependable Rainfall of (i) Catchment (mm) (ii) Ayacut (mm)

(f) Maximum Design Flood Discharge (PMF) 9089 m3/s.

3. RESERVOIR (a) Dead Storage Capacity (MCM) 67.19 (b) Gross Storage Capacity (MCM) 147.02 (c) Bed Level 94 (d) Minimum Draw Down Level (MDDL) (m) 122 (e) Full Reservoir Level (FRL) (m) 132 4. RUNOFF AT THE DAM SITE (a) At 50% dependability (MCM) 357.8

(b) At 75% dependability (MCM) 251.5

(c) At 90% dependability (MCM) 176.1 5. HEAD WORKS A. Main Dam (a) Type Earthen Dam and Dyke (b) Average Height of Dam (m) 42.5 (c) Top Width of Dam (m) 10 (d) Slope U/s 2.5:1, 2.75:1 & 3:1 D/s 2:1, 2.5:1 & 2.75:1 (e) Length of main Earth Dam (m) 2600 (f) Top Bank Level (TBL) (m) 136.5 B. Spillway & Earthen Dyke (a) Type Ogee (b) Length of Spillway (m) 213

(c) Length of Non over flow blocks both side of spillway 2 (25 + 17.5) = 85 m.

(d) Average height of spillway (m) 18

(i)

Page 29: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

(e) Crest level of Spillway (m) 124

(f) Length of earthen dyke right side of spillway (m) 184

(g) Length of earthen dyke left side of spillway (m) 918 6. DISTRIBUTION (a) Length of Left Main Canal from Dam in (km) 54.4 (b) Gross Commandable Area (GCA) (Ha.) 18492 (c) Culturable Command Area (CCA) (Ha.) 12946 (d) Percentage of CCA to GCA (%) 70 (e) Intensity of Irrigation (Kharif) (%) 85 (f) Intensity of Irrigation (Rabi) (%) 71 (g) Intensity of Irrigation (Perennial) (%) 5 (h) Area irrigated during Kharif (Ha.) 11004 (i) Area irrigated during Rabi (Ha.) 9192 (j) Area irrigated during Perennial (Ha.) 647 (k) Annual Irrigation (Ha.) 20843 (l) Average Annual Evaporation (MCM) 11.58 (m) Average Annual Irrigation (MCM) 186.49 (n) Average M& I Water Supply (MCM) 6

(ii)

Page 30: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

LOWER VANSADHARA PROJECT, STAGE -I SALIENT FEATURES FOR ESTIMATE OF COST

Unit I – Civil Works Direct Charges 415.48 crore Indirect Charges 3.76 crore Total Civil Works 419.24 crore Unit – II Main Canal, Branch & Distribution System

Direct Charges 190.19 crore Indirect Charges 1.96 crore

Total Civil Works 192.16 crore

TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT 611.40 crore B/C Ratio 2.27

IRR 15.31%

(i)

Page 31: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 1Haryana –122015

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 ODISHA STATE

Odisha, located on the east coast of India, by the Bay of Bengal, is the ninth largest

state by area and the eleventh largest by population. Odiya is the official and most

widely spoken language of the state. Odisha has a relatively unindented coastline

(about 480 km long) and lacks good ports, except for the deepwater facility at

Paradeep. The narrow level coastal strip, including the Mahanadi River delta supports

the bulk of the population. The interior of the state is mountainous and sparsely

populated. Deomali at 1672 m is the highest point of the state. Odisha is subjected to

intense cyclones. The most intense one in October 1999 caused severe damage and

around 10,000 deaths.

Odisha is home to the Hirakud Dam, one of the longest dams in the world. Odisha has

several popular tourist destinations. Puri, with the Jagannath temple near the sea, and

Konark, with the Sun Temple, are visited by thousands of tourists every year. The

Lingaraja Temple of Bhubaneswar, the Jagannatha Temple of Puri, the Sun Temple of

Konark and the Barabati Fort of Cuttack are important in the archaeological history of

India.

1.2 THE RIVER BASIN

Vansadhara is an important east flowing river between Mahanadi and Godavari in

southern Odisha and north east of Andhra Pradesh. In fact, name of the river is

derived from the words ‘bansa’ means bamboo and ‘dhara’ meaning flows. The river

originates near village Lanjigarh in Kalahandi district of Odisha and flows for about

254 km in Odisha and Andhra Pradesh before its outfall into the Bay of Bengal near

Kalingapatnam.

The river basin lies between 18°10’ to 19°55’ N latitude and 83°20’ to 84° 20’E

longitude and has total catchment area of about 10,830 km2. Tourist attractions of

Srimukhalingum and Kalingapatanam in Srikakulam district are situated on the bank

of this river. During its journey from source of outfall, the river is formed by 13

Page 32: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 2Haryana –122015

tributaries. The major tributaries are 1) Bhangi, 2) Pedageda (1 and 2 are on right

bank), 3) Bada nalla, 4) Chauladhua, 5) Pondka nalla, 6) Badajhor, 7) Harabhangi, 8)

Sananadi and 9) Mahendratanaya (3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 on left bank).

1.3 THE PROJECT

1.3.1 Aim

Government of Odisha has embarked upon an ambitious plan of harnessing the

untapped irrigation potential of various river basins of the state. Vansadhara river

basin is one such river basin which is proposed to be partly tapped for creating

additional irrigation potential in its lower reach through the proposed Lower

Vansadhara Project. With the aim of ameliorating the lot of the poor inhabitants of

the area, this project has been taken up by the Water Resources Department of Govt.

of Odisha. A Feasibility Report has already been prepared by WAPCOS Ltd. The

subsequent work of a Detailed Project Report has also been entrusted to WAPCOS

Ltd.

1.3.2 Location

The Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage – I comprises two storage schemes viz. Sana

Nadi Dam & Vansadhara Barrage near Khaira and Panidonger in the District of

Rayagada respectively to cater mainly irrigation, industrial, municipal demands and

flood control etc.

The project command lies downstream on Left & Right bank of the river Vansadhara

and left bank of Sana Nadi. A Project Location map is shown in Volume-III

(Drawings Part I/II) vide no. WAP/WRD/LVP/1.

1.3.3 Project Planning in Brief

The Sana Nadi Dam envisages construction of a 2600 m long earthen dam, 1400 m

long earthen dyke with an Ogee Spillway of 213 m in length across Sana Nadi River

at 1908’17.4” N latitude and 83052’39” E longitude near village Khaira in Rayagada

district of Odisha. The catchment area intercepted by dam is 1205 km2. The

construction of the dam at Khaira creates a reservoir having gross storage capacity of

Page 33: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 3Haryana –122015

147.02 MCM. The live storage capacity is 79.83 MCM at Full Reservoir Level

(FRL) of 132.00 m. The culturable command area of 54.40 km length of the Left

Bank Main Canal and its distribution system is 12946 ha CCA out of its Gross

Command Area of 18492 ha. The FSL at the head of Left Main Canal is kept at 120

m. The annual irrigation is 20843 ha with an intensity of 85%, 71% and 5% during

Kharif, Ravi and Perennial seasons respectively. The area irrigated during Kharif is

11004 ha while the area irrigated during Ravi is 9192 ha and during perennial in 647

ha.

The Vansadhara Barrage envisages construction of 426.5 m Barrage on Vansadhara

River at Panidanagar at 19° 22’ 53.5” N and 83° 45’39.7” E. From this barrage, a

Right Bank Main Canal off takes, which is 36.45 km of length and irrigates 8105 ha

of CCA with its distribution system out of 11578 ha of its Gross Command Area

(GCA) having 126.5 m FSL at 0 chainage of Right Main Canal (RMC). Further, 9.35

km long Gudari distributary off taking from left bank of Vansadhara Barrage

irrigates 1099 ha of CCA with its distribution system out of 1571 ha of GCA having

FSL of 126.5 m head of Gudari Distributary.

The annual irrigation is for an area of 14819 ha with an intensity of 85%, 71% and

5% during Kharif, Ravi and Perennial seasons respectively. The area irrigated during

Kharif is 7824 ha while the area irrigated during Ravi is 6535 ha and during

perennial in 460 ha.

The salient features of Lower Vansadhara Irrigation Project (Stage-I) for dam and

barrage are given separately for ready reference.

1.3.4 Accessibility to the Project

Odisha is crisscrossed by a network of excellent National / State Highways.

Bhubaneswar is well connected with all major metros (Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata,

Chennai, Hyderabad, and Bangalore) by flights operated by Air India and other

Airlines. There is no regular passenger ship but charter ships and cruise liners call at

Paradeep Port, a major sea port of India.

Page 34: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 4Haryana –122015

The Project area lies in the district of Rayagada in Odisha. The state of Odisha is well

connected by major roads and railway facilities. It is nearly 390 Km from

Bhubaneswar the capital of Odisha by road.

1.4 GENERAL FEATURES

General features like climate, rainfall, temperature, socio economy, demography etc.,

pertaining to state/ basin is briefly discussed below.

1.4.1 Climate

The climate of entire basin is of tropical monsoon type with different seasons such as

Summer (March to May) Monsoon (June to Sept.), Post Monsoon (October to

November), Winter (Dec to Feb). As there is no meteorological station inside the

basin within Odisha, Gopalpur IMD station has been considered for recording

climatological and meteorological information.

1.4.2 Temperature

The maximum temperature during summer days at Gopalpur is 41.9 °C and minimum

temperature is about 25°C. Minimum winter temperature recorded at Gopalpur is 9°C.

The maximum and minimum mean temperature of the basin varies from 33°C to 7°C

respectively.

1.4.3 Rainfall

Rainfall in the basin is mainly due to southwest monsoon, which is active from June

to October. About 80% of annual precipitation occurs during monsoon period. The

annual rainfall varies from 2391mm to 410 mm.

1.4.4 Relative humidity

It is seen that relative humidity is maximum in the month of August and minimum in

the month of March. The relative humidity in the basin varies from 88% to 93%

during July to September.

Page 35: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 5Haryana –122015

1.4.5 Wind velocity

The main wind direction in the basin is between Southwest and Northwest during the

first half of the monsoon seasons. In the second half of the monsoon season, the wind

direction is between West and Northwest. The wind velocity varies from about 0.5 km

/hr to 3.2 km/ hr on normal days.

1.4.6 Cloud cover

During Southwest monsoon, sky is generally over-cast. For the rest of the year, sky is

generally clear and lightly clouded. The maximum cloud cover is observed in the

month of June and July and minimum cloud cover is in December and January.

1.4.7 Natural Resources

Forests:

The forest area is nearly 58,136 km2 which constitutes 37.34 % of the geographic area

of the state. While the reserved forests constitute 42.59 %, protected area as 26.7%

and unclassified forest as 28.01 %. The geographic area of Rayagada district is 7073

km2. The total forest area is nearly 3038 km2 which is really 42.95 % of the

Page 36: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 6Haryana –122015

FOREST COVER MAP OF ORISSA

geographical area. The total forest area covers the dense forest, moderate dense forest,

open forest and scrub. The moderately dense forest area is nearly 1076 km2.

Minerals:

Odisha produces enormous minerals including nonmetallic, metallic and fuel minerals

like Chromite, Nickel, Iron, Manganese, Coal, Fire clay, Mineral sands, Graphite,

Bauxite, Lead and Zinc. Nearly 10-14 % of mineral production comes from state of

Odisha. The rich reserves of minerals have led to establishment of several mineral

based industries. Other minerals which are being mined in the State include Quartz,

Quartzite and Soap stone. Many different locations in the state are being zeroed in for

the excavation of Gemstones and Garnets.

Page 37: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 7Haryana –122015

MINERAL MAP OF ODISHA

Soil:

Taking into account the soil type, climate and topography the state has been divided

into ten agro climatic zones as shown in the table below. The soil quality index of

Odisha state (0.54) is very low as compared to the neighboring states. The state has

different types of soil ranging from fertile alluvial deltaic soils in coastal plains, mixed

red and black soils in central table land, red and yellow soils with low fertility in

northern plateau and red, black and brown forest soils in Eastern Ghats region.

Sr.No.

Agro climatic Zone Climate Soil Group

1 North Western Plateau Hot and Moist Red and Yellow2 North Central Plateau Hot and Moist Red Loamy3 North Eastern Coastal Plateau Hot, moist & sub humid Alluvial4 East and South Eastern

PlateauHot and Humid Coastal alluvial saline ( near

the coastline)5 North Eastern Ghat Hot, moist and sub

humidLaterite and brown forest

6 Eastern Ghat High Land Warm and Humid Red

Page 38: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8Haryana –122015

7 South Eastern Ghat Warm and Humid Red, mixed red and yellow8 Western Undulating Warm and moist Black, mixed red and black9 West Central Table Land Hot and moist Red, heavy textured colours10 Mid Central Table Land Hot and dry sub humid Red loamy, laterite mixed

red and black.

The Rayagada district falls under the northern Eastern Ghats agro climatic zone. The north

Eastern Ghats agro climatic zone comprises of brown forest soils, sandy loam, loamy & clay,

medium textured. The soil type is loamy but in higher elevation the soil is rocky with small to

big boulders. On the basis of aridity index, the state can be divided into four zones:

SrNo

Zone classification based upon aridityindex

Classification of district

1 High moisture deficit zone (45 and above) North-western districts2 Moderately high moisture deficit zone (40

to 45)South coastal districts

3 Medium moisture deficit zone (35 to 40) Central table-land districts4 Low moisture deficit zone (35 and less) North coastal districts

1.4.8 Socio economic status

Agriculture is the main source of livelihood of the people of the basin. The economic

growth of the people of the basin can be enhanced only by assured irrigation both in

Kharif and Rabi.

1.4.9 Demography

Odisha has a population of 41.9 million (Census-2011). The total male population is

50.54% while the female population is 49.46%. About 83.32% of the population lives

in the village and one third of the rural population does not own any land other than

homesteads. Nearly 83.32% of the population in rural and 16.68% in urban. Some of

the important tribes in Odisha are Santhal, Bonda, Munda, Oraon, Kora and Mahali.

Schedule Tribe population constitutes nearly 22.13% of the State’s population.

Population density of the state is 260 persons per km2. Literacy rate is 73.45% with

82.40% of male and 64.36% of female being literate. According to livestock census

2003 the livestock population is nearly 23.39 million.

Page 39: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 9Haryana –122015

1.4.10 Food and agriculture

Agriculture is the primary occupation of the inhabitants of the basin. A large number

of ponds existing in the basin act as supplement during the period when water is

scarce. Paddy is the main crop grown in the area in addition to oilseeds, vegetables,

pulses and cotton. Sugarcane is also grown in small pockets in the basin. The total

cultivable area is 2311 km2.

1.5 CHOICE OF THE PROJECT

The irrigation facilities available in Rayagada are very meager. In addition to

providing irrigation, the project fulfills drinking water and industrial water demands.

To some extent the project will be useful in controlling floods. The socio-economic

conditions of the poor people in the command area will improve considerably with the

coming up of the project.

1.6 INTERLINKING OF THE SCHEMES

The Lower Vansadhara Irrigation Project is not related with any adjoining basin.

1.7 INTERSTATE AND INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS

The project lies entirely in Odisha and therefore, no interstate issues are involved in the

planning of this project. However, there is an interstate agreement between Odisha and

Andhra Pradesh to share the waters of the basin on a 50:50 basis. This aspect is

discussed in detail in Chapter – 3 of this report volume.

1.8 BENEFIT FROM THE PROJECT

The direct benefit is for irrigation and indirect benefits are flood mitigation, drinking

water and industrial water demands.

1.9 PUBLIC CO-OPERATION AND PARTICIPATION

The general public in the command is very much interested for implementing this

project (except a few people resistant) very early and there will be good co-operation

Page 40: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 10Haryana –122015

from the people in this regard. However, there will be no public participation as far as

finance for implementing the project concerned.

1.10 PUBLIC VIEW AND BENEFITS AND PROPOSED LEVIES

The public of Rayagada district in general is very much keen that the project should

come and they are anxiously waiting for deriving from the project. They are prepared

to pay the water rates fixed by the Govt. from time to time.

Page 41: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 1Haryana –122015

CHAPTER 2

PHYSICAL FEATURES

2.1 GEOGRAPHICAL DISPOSITION

The river Vamsadhara is an important east flowing river between Mahanadi and Godavari.

The river originates near Lanjigarh village in the Kalahandi district of Odisha. Flowing for a

distance of about 254 km in Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, it falls in to Bay of Bengal at

Kalingapatnam. The Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I envisages construction of a 2600 m

long Earthen Dam 1400 m long across Sananadi a tributary of Vanasadhara River on left

side out falling near Gunupur at 19° 8’17.4” N latitude and 83°52’39” E longitude near

village Khaira in (near Gunupur) Rayagada district of Odisha. The Left Main Canal having

length of 54.40 km off takes from Earthen Dam and irrigates 12946 ha CCA with several

distribution Canal Systems. The F.S.L at Head of Left Main Canal is kept 120 m.

Further, a Barrage of length 426.5 m is also proposed to construct on Vansadhara River near

village Panidangar (near Gudari) with 19° 22’53.5” N latitude and 83°45’39.7” E longitude.

The Right Main Canal having length of 36.45 km off-takes from proposed Barrage and

irrigates 8105 ha CCA with its system. Further, 9.35 km long Gudari distributary off taking

from left bank of Panidanger Barrage irrigates 1099 ha of CCA. The FSL at the head of both

the canals is 126.5 m.

2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY

Odisha State lies within latitude 17° 48’ N to 23° 34’ N and longitude 81° 24’ E to 87° 29’

E and is bounded on the north by Bihar, on the west by Madhya Pradesh, on the south by

Andhra Pradesh and on the north – east by West Bengal. On the south – east, is the Bay of

Bengal with a coastline of 480 km. The State consists of 30 districts covering an area of

1,56,000 km2. The State is divisible into four regions namely the Northern Plateau, the

Central River Basin, the Eastern Ghats hill ranges and the Coastal plains. The principal

rivers include the Mahanadi, Brahmani, Baitarani, Rushikulya, Vanasadhara, Nagavali and

Budhabalanga etc. The Chilka Lake, the widest lagoon in India, is a prominent coastal

feature in the State.

Page 42: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 2Haryana –122015

The total catchment area of the basin is 10830 km2. Urban Centres in the basin are

Srikakulam, Narsannapeta, Pathapattanam, Sompeta, Paralakhemundi, Gunupur,

Kashinagar, Bisamcuttack, Rayagada, Muniguda etc. With regard to industries, the basin has

no large scale industry. However, number of agro-forest based small scale industries are

located in Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh and Koraput and Kalahandi district of

Odisha. Important minerals found in the basin are Manganese, Graphite, Mica, Quartz, etc.

Manganese ore is abundantly available in Srikakulam and Koraput districts. Hydrological

observation stations at Kashinagar and Gunupur are maintained by CWC, who are regularly

collecting stage discharge and sediment data. At Kashinagar, water quality parameters are

also determined by CWC.

The northern plateau, covering the district of Mayurbhanj, Keonjhar, Sundergarh and a part

of Dhenkanal, is an undulating topography having a general slope from north to south.

There are hill ranges in the north – east at elevation of over 1,000 m with peaks of 1,188 m

(Malaygiri) in Dhenkanal, 1,117 m (Mankarnacha) in Keonjhar and 1,116 m (Meghasani)

in Mayurbhanj. The average elevation in the central area, forming the watershed of the

Baitarani and Brahmani rivers, is about 1,000 m. The central River basin lies between the

northern plateau and the eastern hills and covers the districts of Bolangir, Sambalpur and

Dhenkanal and it comprises the watershed areas of the principal rivers of the State. The river

valleys are Mahanadi – Tel, Mahanadi, Brahmani and Baitarani. Isolated hills rises abruptly

from the plains. On the east, the ‘East Ghats’ stretches for about 250 km and covers

Koraput, Kalahandi, Kandhamal and Ganjam districts. The high peaks are 1,673 m.

(Deomali) in Koraput, 1,599 m. (Turiakonda) in Koraput, 1,531 m. and 1,501 m.

(Mahendragiri) peaks in Ganjam. Most of the area has a general elevation of over 900 m.

which form the watershed of some rivers. The Coastal Plains form an extensive alluvial tract

between the hills and the coast, and includes parts of Balasore, Cuttack and Ganjam district.

The alluvial areas are well watered by river and canals and the coastal area is sandy or

marshy.

Page 43: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 3Haryana –122015

The physical features showing the location of the Vansadhara valley in district Rayagada

Odisha

2.3 STRUCTURE AND TECTONICS

The regional trend in the Eastern Ghats belt is dominantly N.E. – S.W. in the south –

western part (Koraput district) which gradually changes to N.-S. in the western part

(Kalahandi district) and then to E.N.E.- W.S.W. through N.E.- S.W. in the northern part .

The E.N.E. - W.S.W. trend in the Bolangir district abruptly changes to N.W. - S.E. trend

(Mahanadi trend) and continues in the north – eastern part of the orogen (eastern Phulbani ,

Dhenkanal, Cuttack and Puri District) until it disappears under the coastal sedimentary

cover. This spectacular change in the trend is considered to be due to major cross folding

alone a N.W. – S.E. axis. That superimposed or cross folding had taken place is amply

evidenced from the result of structural studies carried out several workers in part of the belt.

Further, it is likely that the emplacement of the anorthosite bodies in the Puri and Bolangir

districts is controlled by these cross fold movements. The abrupt change in Mahanadi trend

ODISHA

Page 44: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 4Haryana –122015

in the north – eastern part is interpreted to be due either to the presence of large steeply

plunging folds or to the later movement on the marginal part of the craton (Chatterji et al,

1971).

2.4 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY

Forming a part of the north-eastern extension of the peninsular shield, Odisha is by and

large underlain by Precambrian rocks. A little less than 25 per cent of the total area of the

State is constituted of the phenerozoic rocks, Quaternary formations and the Recent to Sub –

Recent alluvium. These latter are chiefly confined to the coastal tracts and the Brahmani and

Mahanadi valleys.

The Precambrian rocks are represented by pelitic, psammitic, psammopelitic with

subordinate psephitic and calcareous rocks, metamorphosed in several grades and

structurally deformed to different intensities, and transformed to various degrees. These

sediments and meta sediments occur as dissected patches separated by vast stretches of

granites, ortho – and para – gneisses, injection gneisses, migmatites, Charnokites and basic

and ultra basic intrusive and effusive rocks mostly of mafic composition.

Represented among the Precambrian are the rocks of different facies reflecting the widely

varying tectonic environment in which they were deposited and / or emplaced. The tectonic

– sedimentary environments range from little differentiated (tectonically) permobile stage to

well differentiated platform – geosynclinal conditions.

The phanerozoic rocks are represented by the Gondwana Super – Group encompassing

upper Paleozoic to Middle Mesozoic, and the Baripada Beds of Lower Tertiary. The

Gondwanas are of non – marine continental facies, and the Lower Tertiary rocks indicate a

marine environment.

The stratigraphy of the different groups of rocks is compiled from the work of the various

geologists both within and outside the Department. The basis of sub – division, particularly

Page 45: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 5Haryana –122015

of the Precambrian together with the lithostraigraphic of each group is briefly discussed

below:

The stratigraphic sub – division of the Precambrian is a widely discussed problem in view of

the inherent difficulties of classifying over three million years of the Earth’s history which is

scarcely recorded in any from other than the different types of litho genesis. In India

considerable interest is being evinced in recent years as more and more radiometric age data

on rocks is becoming available.

Subdivision of the Precambrian is primarily dependent on the ability to recognise natural

stages of geological history which are characterised by definite types of litho genesis

determined by the interplay of specific tectonic and geochemical environment (Salop 1972).

Tectonic cycles, combinations of tectonics, magnetism and metamorphism serve as the main

basis for limiting the time boundary between any two rock assemblages recognised in space.

A combination of geological and radiometric age data will afford the best result in rock

classification. A synthesis of all the available data has recently been made by Chatterji and

Banerji ( 1971 ) who have provisionally suggested that the Precambrian of India be

subdivided into two Supper – Group , viz., the Riphean and Pre – Riphean. All the rock

older than 1,400 m.y. is to be described as Pre – Riphean while those having ages between

600 and 1,400 m.y. as Riphean. The platform cover rocks which may be younger than 600

m.y. may be termed Vendian. More recently Salop (1972) presented the main principles

which constitute the basis for a unified stratigraphic scale for the Precambrian.

In the stratigraphic – tectonic classification of the Precambrian in Odisha, an attempt is

made to follow the main principles formulated by Salop (1972), although the meagre

radiometric data available proved a major hurdle in making the sub – division more

unambiguous. The sub – division is presented the relegation of the different groups into the

broad framework suggested by Chatterji and Banerjee (1971) is also shown.

Page 46: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 6Haryana –122015

Pre – Riphean Super group

The stratigraphic succession of the rocks of the Group emerging from the recent work of the

officers of the Department is as follows:

Porphyritic granite, porphyritic granite gneiss and augen gneiss

-------------------------------- intrusive contact ----------------------------------

Leptynites, streaky granulites and garnetiferous granite gneiss

Charnockite suite of rocks

Pyroxene granulites

Khondalite suite – garnet – sillimanite gneiss, graphitic gneiss, garnetiferous

Quartzite, calc – silicate granulites, etc.

Rocks of this Group are distributed in the Puri, Ganjam, Phulbani, Koraput, Kalahandi,

Bolangir, Sambalpur, Dhenkanal and Cuttack district. Broadly they are grouped into the

Khondalite suite of rocks comprising the metamorphosed sediment of argillaceous,

arenaceous and calcareous composition and the charnockite suite.

The highly aluminous meta sediments are chiefly represented by the Khondalite composed

essentially of quartz – garnet – potash feldspar – sillimanite with or without graphite. Gray

to pink coloured quartzites with garnet and occasionally fine needles of sillimanite occur

interbanded with Khondalite. The calc – silicate granulites composed of diopside – scapolite

granulites with wollastonite occur as concordant bands with other metasediments.

Pyroxene granulites, also known as the mafic granulites or comprising two type of pyroxene

– granulites, i.e. ortho – and clinopyroxene granulites, occur as small lenses or thin bands

conformable with the meta sediments. They are also found as inclusions in the charnockite

suite of rocks suggesting their older age. These rocks are homogeneous granulitic rocks

carrying sub – calcic plagioclase, orthopyroxene, and light green clinopyroxene, quartz,

garnet, pleochroic hornblende and biotite. The consensus of opinion is that these rocks

represent original mafic igneous rocks either as sills or flows metamorphosed into the mafic

granulites along with the enclosing sediments.

Page 47: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 7Haryana –122015

The Charnockite suite comprises the acid with orthopyroxene – quartz – potash feldspar

(garnet) and the genetically related rocks like alaskites, enderbites and hypersthene – quartz

– syenites. The intermediate type of charnockite represents hybrid types with the mafic and

portions distributed irregularly as patches or arranged in parallel bands.

The leptynites including the garnetiferous granite – gneisses occur generally as bands along

the contact regions of Khondalites with charnockites and granite gneisses. Granite gneisses,

next to charnockites and Khondalites, occupy larger tracts of the Eastern Ghats in Odisha.

They vary from syn – tectonic medium – grained grey gneisses to post – tectonic coarse

granites and porphyroblastic gneisses.

Post – tectonic magmatism in the Eastern Ghats belt is manifested in the intrusion of

anorthosites and alkaline rocks either along the axial regions of cross folds or along en

echelon shears or dislocation zones. Coarse grained anorthosites grading to gabbroic rocks

are reported from two localities near Banpur in Puri district and near Bolangir in Bolangir

district, each occupying an area of over 300 km2. Two relatively smaller minor bodies are

also reported from Turkel and Jugsaipatna area, Kalahandi district and a minor patch from

Angul area, Dhenkanal district. The alkali rocks are represented by alkali – gabbros, calc –

alkali syenite perthite syenite and nepheline syenite in Koraput district; perthite syenites

with nepheline and nephelinites in Kalahandi district and biotite nepheline syenite in

Sambalpur and Deogarh districts.

The mineral assemblages of the rocks of this group, particularly the two types of pyroxene

granulites, are characteristic of high pressure – high temperature regional metamorphism of

granulite facies. Regional retrogression has lowered the facies of metamorphism as

evidenced by the presence of assemblages typical of hornblende – granulite and almandine –

amphibolite facies. Polymetamorphism is suggested by the occurrence of pelitic

assemblages such as sillimanite – garnet – biotite – potash feldspar, cordierite – garnet –

hypersthene – biotite – plagioclase etc.

Page 48: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project(Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8Haryana –122015

2.5 MINERAL OCCURENCES

2.5.1 Graphite

The reservoir, the appurtenant structures and the canal network of the Lower Vanasadhara

Project lie in Raygada and Gajapati District. Where Precambrian rocks of Eastern Ghats

Group are seen. Bauxite, Manganese ore and Graphite deposits occur in the Eastern Ghats

rock types in Raygada District. The non- metallic minerals, quartz and quartzite also occur

in association with Eastern Ghats rocks which have industrial use. In Gajapati district, the

granitic rocks and gneisses can be used as dimension stone.

However, there is no occurrence of mineral deposit in the project area. As such, no mineral

of economic importance will be submerged in the reservoir area.

Page 49: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 1Haryana –122015

CHAPTER 4

SURVEY AND INVESTIGATION

4.1 GENERAL

The survey and field investigation work as required for preparation of feasibility for the

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage - I has been executed as per CWC guidelines 2000 and

also in accordance with the revised procedure for submission / examination of DPR by

CWC. The field survey requirements were identified based on topsheet study and

reconnaissance surveys were carried out as per the conceptual planning of the various

components of the project. The investigation works relating to Geological investigation

work and Geo-technical assessment has been done keeping in view the requirements of

Term of Reference of the agreement.

The project was initially conceptualized and was taken up by the Water Resources

Department, Government of Odisha for preparation of feasibility report. After

reconnaissance survey of various sites in Vansadhara river basin, followed by detailed

study and investigations involving geology, topography and hydrology, soil survey etc the

site has been selected for the proposed Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage - I. The

following field surveys and investigations were taken up for forming up selection of the

project site.

4.2 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY

Based on topo sheet identification, some tentative dam and barrage sites in lower reaches

of the Vansadhara river basin were visited. Areas upstream and downstream of the dam,

barrage and power house sites were traversed and physiographical and other relevant

features noted for further examination.

4.3 TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY WORK

Experts of Water Resource Dept, Govt. of Odisha and WAPCOS visited the tentative

proposed dam, barrage and power house sites in the basin area. After geological

Page 50: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 2Haryana –122015

reconnaissance and detailed appraisal of the geological features of the project area, the

proposed site has been found to be geologically safe and suitable for construction of

headworks structures.

Following Topographical Survey Works have been carried out as per requirement of

Terms of Reference and as per specifications of CWC guideline August 2000.

First of all, double leveling survey work i.e. shifting of TBM to proposed Dam and

Barrage from nearest GTSBM of SOI has been done from dated 08.11.09 to 26.11.09.

During this survey work, three circuits were formed. Circuit wise list of TBM are shown

in annexure 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3.

Further, the location and value of BM has been provided by D.O.W.R Odisha and the

location and value of BM are as under.

I. BM CWC office Gunupur = 93.060 m, II. GTS BM IB Gumda = 106.365 m,

III. BMCWC office Gudari = 130.890 m.

Concerned Asst. Engineer has checked the observed level on dated 12.11.09 and 26.11.09

and also recorded in level books.

i) Bench Marks have also been established by double leveling connecting to GTS

bench marks located in the Inspection Bungalow, Gudari inter connecting with

Gauge stations in Gunupur & Gudari and along the Main Canal alignments viz.,

1) Left Main Canal ex.- Sana Nadi Dam and 2) Right Main Canal ex.- Vansadhra

Barrage. The statements showing BM numbers, elevations and location details of

three circuits, LMC & RMC have been attached as Annexure 4.4 to 4.7

respectively. Maps showing the location and value of BMs established in the

project areas and along the LMC & RMC have been appended to Drawing

Volume- III (Part-I/II). (Refer Drawing No. 22 a and 57)

Page 51: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 3Haryana –122015

ii) Strip Survey along Alignment of Main Canal

The survey has been carried out along the canal alignment in length of 74.245 km

for flow canal which have been proposed from left side of Sana Nadi.

Longitudinal sections have been prepared with levels @ 50 m intervals and cross

sections of the alignment have been developed by taking readings at every 50 m

interval along the length and extending to 150 m either side of the center line of

the canal alignment.

All drawing pertaining to Strip Survey has been represented in a local Northing

and Easting co-ordinate system. All topographical contour plans for strip survey

have been developed at a scale of 1:200 with contour interval of 1 m.

The corresponding L-sections has been plotted at the scale 1:2000 (H) and 1:100

(V). The proposed main canal alignment runs through Topo sheet no. E44F,

E44L, E45A, E44F/16, E44L/13, E45G/1, E44F15, E45A/3 & E45A/4.

iii) Establishing Bench Marks

Bench Marks at every 1 km have been established along the boundary of

approved alignment with C.C. Pillars of standard size with nominal

reinforcement, fixed in M-10 graded cement concrete. The new BMs have been

connected to the nearest GTS or permanent Bench Mark of SOI by double

leveling. The words ‘B.M.’ and the RL values have been painted clearly on every

CC Pillar.

BMs have been established on permanent structures falling en-route and carrying

the GTS value to the project sites and interconnected to CWC gauge stations in

Gunupur & Gudari and upto Taramal for Sana Nadi & upto Gudari for

Vanasadhara and along the LMC ex.- Sana Nadi Dam and RMC ex. –

Vanasadhara Barrage. A list of established Bench Marks is given at Appendix 4.1

Page 52: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 4Haryana –122015

to 4.5 and maps showing elevation & pillar numbers appended to drawing

volume- III (Part-I/II) (Reference Drawing 22 a and 57).

iv) Fixing of Center Line Stones

The alignment of the canal has been fixed accurately. For center line marking

chisel dressed cut stones of size 600 x 150 x 150 mm or R.C.C. blocks of size 450

x 100 x 100 mm has been fixed at every 500 m and at point of intersections and

also along tangent and apex point of curves along the alignment of the canal.

Statements showing co- ordinates of Apex stones fixed along the centre line and

at apex of the canal alignments (viz. LMC, RMC and Gudari Distributary) and

submergence periphery are enclosed as Appendix 4.6, 4.7, 4.8 and 4.9

respectively.

v) Fixing of Boundary Stones

The boundary has been marked with chisel dressed cut stones of size 600 x 150 x

150 mm or C.C. block of size 450 x 100 x 100 mm has been fixed @ 500 m

interval on either side of alignment of the canal.

vi) Preparation of Land Acquisition Plan

i) Width of land required for canal acquisition has been worked out based on

the cross sections of the canal.

ii) Width of land required for irrigation sources (new/old) /canal/pipeline

acquisition has been worked out based on the cross sections of the canal @

50 m intervals all along the length and area arrived at for canal.

iii) Demarcation stones of size 600 x 150 x 150 mm along the boundaries of

land acquisition @ 500 m interval has been fixed on both the sides.

iv) The alignment along with land widths as worked out above has been

marked on the village plan to assess survey number wise area of land to be

acquired for execution.

Page 53: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 5Haryana –122015

v) Thus, land plan schedules in the prescribed proforma covering survey

numbers, particulars of land and land holders, survey number wise area to

be acquired along with classification of land etc. has been prepared.

Details of land acquisition plan has been presented in this Report and appended in

separate volume – II B Land Schedule.

vi) Command Area Surveys Work

Topographical survey of Command area in scale 1:3960, with contour at 0.5 m

interval on village maps are being carried out. For this purpose the survey party

has collected the village maps; khasra map of land, details of each land like area,

details of land owners etc. i.e. RoRs are either down loaded from the official

website of Govt. of Odisha ‘www.bhulekh.com’ or recorded from the

corresponding Tahasil records in case of non- availability in the web site and

developed digitized version of the maps.

Incorporating all the collected details, topographical plan of each cultivation land

are being prepared developing contour at 0.5 m intervals taking levels at suitable

intervals and at each corner of the plot as well as at centre point of each plot. A

pilot area more than 10% of the total area being surveyed.

All contour drawings are being developed on a scale of 1:3960. Details of 10%

Command Area Survey Plan has been presented in this report in volume III

Drawings.

vii) Dam Base/Barrage Base Survey Works

Topographical surveys work on river Vansadhara for barrage near Panidangar and

on river Sana Nadi for dam, has been carried out on its proposed Axis by

observing levels by making a 50 m grid upto 250m on the up stream and 500m on

the down stream of the Axis and extending upto MWL+2H, where H is the height

of Dam.

Page 54: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 6Haryana –122015

ix) River Survey Works

A) Sana Nadi

L- Section has been developed up to 16,560 m @ 20 m interval on the U/S

side of proposed dam axis across Sana Nadi near village Khaira. Similarly L –

Section has been developed on the D/S of the proposed dam axis. (Refer

drawing no. 17, vol. - 3)

X – Section has been developed up to 16,500 m on U/S of dam axis. The

interval of X – Section has been drawn @ 200 m with levels at 50 m interval

extending up to el. 137 m and above (i.e. MWL + 5 m = 137 m) on either side

of the river bank up to 2,000 m U/S of the proposed dam axis. The interval has

been increased to 1 km and the X- Section have been drawn with levels 50 m

intervals extending up to el. 137 m and above (i.e. MWL + 5 m = 137 m) on

either side of river bank between 2,000 m to 16,500 m. Similarly the X -

Section have been developed @ 200 m interval with levels at 50 m interval

extending on either bank of the river up to 101 m (HFL + 1 m i.e. 101 m) up

to 2,000 m from proposed dam axis towards D/S (Refer drawing no. 18, vol. –

III).

B) Vansadhara River

L – Section has been developed up to 10,200 m @ 20 m interval on the U/S

side of barrage axis across river Vanasadhara near village Panidangar.

Similarly, L – Section has been developed for 10,960 m @ 20 m interval on

the D/S side of the barrage axis (refer drawing no. 41, vol.- 3)

X- Sections have been developed up to 10 km on U/S of barrage axis. The

interval of the X – Sections have been drawn @ 200 m with levels of 50 m

interval extending up to el. 133 m and above (Pond level + 5 m) on either side

of the river bank up to 2, 000 m U/S of the proposed barrage axis. The interval

of X – Section has been increased to 1 km from 2,000 m to 10,000 m.

Similarly, the X – Sections have been developed @ 200 m interval with levels

50 m interval extending on either bank of the river up to el. 127.2 m and

Page 55: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 7Haryana –122015

above (HFL +1 m) up to 2,000 m from the proposed barrage axis towards D/S

(Refer drawing no. 42, vol. – III)

x) Reservoir Survey Works

A) Submergence of Sana Nadi

The submergence area has been surveyed up to EL 137 m and above contoursgenerated at the interval and 50 m grid (Refer drawing no. 6, vol. - III)

Dam base / Dyke base

The dam base for a length of 2960 m with 750 m width (250 m and 500 m D/Sand U/S of dam axis) and the dyke for a length of 1830 m with 750 m width (250 m and 500 m D/S and U/S of dyke axis) have been surveyed and drawingdeveloped (Refer drawing no. 5, vol. – 3)

B) Submergence of Vansadhara River

The pond area /submergence area has been surveyed up to EL 133 m andabove and contours generated at 1 m interval and 50 m grid. (Refer drawingno. 55, vol. – III)

Barrage Base – The barrage base for a length of 1830 m with 750 width (i.e.250 m and 500 m D/S & U/S of barrage axis) has been surveyed and drawingdeveloped with 1 m contour interval and 50 m grid (Refer drawing no. 56, vol.– III)

xi) Accuracies

All the survey instruments have been maintained in good condition to achievehigher accuracies but in no case there shall exceed those given below:

Theodolite/Total Station, EDM Traversing

Allowable error of closure - 1/3000

Allowable error of distance - 1/5000

Leveling

Allowable error of closure - 4√k mm(Where k is the total distance in km)

Page 56: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8Haryana –122015

Drawings developed by the surveys have been presented in the volume – III drawing.

4.4 Geo-technical Investigations Work

4.4.1 Objective of works

Geotechnical investigations and tests has been carried out for the purpose of

gathering adequate Geological and Geotechnical information for the detailed

planning and design of the Lower Vansadhara Project. The objectives of the

investigations and tests at various locations are briefly as under:

a) Dam/Barrage- To determine the foundation depth and properties of

Rock/Soil/Alluvium at the foundation bed level for proposed dam/barrage.

b) Aggregate – To determine the suitability of coarse aggregate/ fine aggregate for

use in PCC/RCC during construction.

c) Borrow area – To determine the suitability of overburden material for use in

dam/barrage construction.

4.4.2 Scope of Works

Following Geo-technical Investigation Works have been carried out as per requirement of

Terms of Reference and as per specifications of CWC guideline August 2000:

The scope of work includes geotechnical investigations of the dam site of length 2.96 km

and barrage sites, to assess the depth of bed rock, thickness of overburden, properties of

the soil and foundation strata and their significance. The investigation work includes

drilling, litho logical logging, excavation of pits, in-situ soil tests and laboratory tests of

soil and rock core samples. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) are conducted in the

overburden parts of the bore holes to know the soil character.

Page 57: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 9Haryana –122015

Bore hole drilling has been carried out at the specified locations of dam and barrage.

Drilled cores has been logged or mapped geologically and geo-technically by appropriate

method. Samples selected from rock cores have been tested in laboratory for specific

gravity, density, uni-axial compressive tests and the test results, logging and mapping

details are appended to this report.

Trial Pits are excavated at specified distance along the dam & dyke axes to obtain the

geological profile. The classification of soil of the borrow pit are attached to the report.

Various laboratory tests like grain size distribution analysis, soil classification, Atterberg

test (liquid and plastic limit), compaction test, tri-axial shear test (un-drained) has been

carried out on collected samples from each hole/pit as per relevant BIS codes. The test

results are enclosed in this report.

4.4.3 Methodology

Methodology adopted in Geo-Technical Investigations Work are as under:

i) Drilling

Boreholes have been drilled with diamond impregnated bits. The goal has been fixed to

achieve 90 percent core recovery. For this suitable equipment in perfect working

condition and with all accessories like core barrels, drill bits, water supply arrangement

etc. has been deployed to achieve best results and complete the drilling work within the

specified time schedule.

All the materials recovered from the bore holes have been preserved in core boxes (length

1.05 m) and have been logged geologically and geo-technically using appropriate forms.

The logging details has been enclosed to this report. The log contained, inter alia, type of

soil and rock, percentage of core recovery, RQD% information on drilling, degree of

weathering, crack spacing, classification of cores and geotechnical description.

Locations of sampling for laboratory tests have been marked appropriately on the log

Page 58: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 10Haryana –122015

sheet with an annotation of sample number. The following BIS Codes/ Guidelines have

been adopted for the core drilling

- Code of practice for diamond core

drilling for site investigation for

river valley projects

- IS 6926-1973

- Code of practice for exploration

by pits, trenches, drifts and shafts

- IS 4453-1980

- Code of practice for indexing and

Storage of drill cores.

- IS 4078-1980

- Presentation of drilling

information and core description

in foundation investigation

- IS 4464-1985

- Guide for core drilling

observations

- IS 5313 – 1980

The core boxes have been stored carefully and delivered to site office as directed.

ii) Permeability Tests

The B.I.S. Code IS. 5529 – PART 1 – 1985 (Theim’s Steady State or Equilibrium

Method) has been adopted for conducting in-situ permeability tests. All the observations,

calculation and the lugeon values at various locations etc. obtained have been

appropriately recovered and the same have been supplied along with geological log of the

bore holes in this report.

iii) Pits

- Pits for investigation have been kept of size 2 m x 2 m and 2 to 3 m deep

- Location of pits has been shown at site during execution.

- Disturbed/ undisturbed sampling has been carried out as per BIS 2720 PTI.

Page 59: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 11Haryana –122015

iv) Sampling

- Samples have been taken as soon as they are retrieved from bore holes/ pits and

sealed in airtight and protective bags individually.

- Quantity of sample have been kept sufficient up to permit the realization all of

required laboratory test.

- Each bag has been labeled with Project name, pit number, Sample number, Date

of sampling and Depth of sampling

v) Laboratory TestsFor carrying out laboratory tests preference has been given to the Labs run by the Odisha

Govt.

The collection of samples has been kept at least one from each pit/auger hole.

Tests have been carried out on representative sample on the basis of categorization

directed by the Geologist.

The various laboratory tests have been conducted which are as follows:

A) Tests on Rock samples

Core samples selected from drill cores of bore holes, have been tested in accordance with

appropriate standards.

a) Uni-axial Compression

b) Density test

c) Percentage of moisture coefficient.

B) Tests on soil samples

a) Index Properties:

- Particle size distribution

- Atterberg limits

- Moisture content

- Density

b) Mechanical Properties:

Page 60: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 12Haryana –122015

- Permeability test

- Consolidation characteristics

- Shear Parameters (UDS)

All the results of above tests done for Geo-technical Investigation works has been presented in

this report.

A geotechnical report pertaining to this project has been furnished separately, which includes

geological logging and other details of drill holes of Sana Nadi Dam and Vansadhara Barrage

sites, statement showing details of bore holes executed for Sana Nadi Dam and Vansadhara

Barrage project. Statement showing details of shallow pits executed for Sana Nadi Dam and

Vansadhara Barrage. Map showing location of bore holes and pits of Sana Nadi Dam and

Vansadhara Barrage along with geological cross-section of Sana Nadi Dam & Dyke and

Vansadhara Barrage vide plate 3.1, 3.2 and 4 respectively.

Page 61: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.1

Statements showing establishment of Bench Marks connecting to GTS Bench Mark

Circuit – I(CWC Gauge station, Gunupur to R & B, Inspection Bungalow, Gumuda)

SL. BMCode

Elevation inmetre

Page /Level Book

Location

1 CWC 93.060 1/LVP - 1 CWC , Gauge Station, SauraPradhaniguda, Gunupur

2 LVD - 1 94.176 1/ LVP - 1 Left end of bridge on Vanasdhra Rivernear Gunupur

3 LVD - 2 94.270 1/ LVP - 1 Right end of bridge on Vansadhara nearGunupur

4 LVD - 3 94.033 2/ LVP - 1 Base of electric pole at Bikramapur chok5 LVD - 4 96.097 2/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone 400 m from Bikramapur

chok6 LVD - 5 95.831 2/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gunupur 2 km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road7 LVD - 6 98.830 3/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gunupur 12 km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road8 LVD - 7 100.377 6/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Ukumba 3km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road9 LVD - 8 104.527 6/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Ukumba 2km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road10 LVD - 9 107.919 8/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gunupur 10 km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road11 LVD -10 96.252 8/ LVP - 1 Parapet of culvert on road Gunupur to

Gumuda, 10.4 km from Gunupur12 LVD - 11 103.179 9/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gumuda 7 km, on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road13 LVD - 12 96.526 10/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gumda 6 km on

Gunupur to Gumuda Road14 LVD - 13 101.048 11/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone at road junction of

Raigurha- Tikarparha and Gunupur toGumuda Road

15 LVD - 14 102.259 12/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gunupur 15 km, onGunupur to Gumuda Road

16 LVD - 15 100.844 13/ LVP - 1 On culvert near Sangiperha nala bridge15.4 km from Gunupur

17 LVD - 16 101.598 14/ LVP - 1 Top of km stone Gumuda 1 km, Gunupurto Gumuda Road

18 GTS 106.365 6/LVP-1 GTS BM, R & B, IB, Gumuda

Page 62: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.2

Statements showing establishment of Bench Marks connecting to GTS Bench Mark

Circuit No. – II(GTS, BM, R & B, IB, Gumuda to Gauge Station, Gudari)

SL. BM Code Elevationin metre

Page /LevelBook

Location

19 GTS 106.365 6/LVP-1 GTS BM, R & B, IB, Gumuda20 LVD - 17 111.980 18/LVP-1 On the bridge from Gumda to Rayagada

road near Gudari road junction21 LVD -18 114.846 19/LVP-1 Base of signboard Pradhan Mantri Gramya

Sadak Yojana, in village Kaluguda22 LVD – 19 104.630 20/LVP-1 Top of kilometre stone, Gumuda 4 km, on

Gumuda to Gudari road23 LVD - 20 104.664 21/LVP-1 On the Culvert Gumuda to Gudari road, 4.5

km from Gumuda24 LVD - 21 108.613 21/LVP-1 Base of signboard PMGSY in village

Derigan25 LVD - 22 110.353 22/LVP-1 On Culvert in front of the Hospital in

village Derigan26 LVD - 23 108.932 22/ LVP-1 On Causeway, 600m from Derigan to

Gudari road27 LVD - 24 109.630 23/LVP-1 Base of signboard of PMGSY, in Derigan28 LVD - 25 111.912 23/LVP-1 Base of signboard of PMGSY, in Derigan29 LVD -26 114.288 23/LVP-1 Base of signboard of PMGSY, in

Karanaparhi30 LVD - 27 115.824 24/LVP-1 On the Culvert, Gumuda to Gudari road, 7.7

km from Gumuda.31 LVD - 28 117.222 24/LVP-1 Top of km stone, Gumuda 8 km, on

Gumuda to Gudari road32 LVD - 29 123.375 25/LVP-1 Top of signboard of PMGSY, at 8.5km

from Gumuda33 LVD - 30 115.542 26/LVP-1 Base of signboard of PMGSY, about 500m

from village Naira34 LVD - 31 114.211 26/LVP-1 On the Chowk of Bus stand, Naira35 LVD - 32 122.305 28/LVP-1 Top of the stone, road junction from

Jagannathpur to Gudari road36 CWC-2 130.890 28/LVP-1 On the pedestal of Rain gauge station of

CWC, Gudari

Page 63: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.3

Statements showing establishment of Bench Marks connecting to GTS Bench Mark

Circuit No. – III(LVD-7, On a km stone, Ukumba 3km, on Gunupur-Gumuda road on circuit I to

School, Taramala)

SL.No.

BM Code Elevationin metre

Page /LevelBook

Location

37 LVD-7 100.377 6/LVP-1 Top of km stone Ukumba 3km, on Gunupurto Gumuda Road

38 SND-1 98.158 34/LVP-1 On the 3rd step of Temple, at road junctionof Chalkamba village

39 SND-2 104.116 34/LVP-1 Top of km stone, Chalkamba to Khairaroad, Chalkamba 1 km

40 SND-3 106.135 35/LVP-1 Top of km stone, Chalkamba to Khairaroad, Chalkamba 2 km

41 SND-4 108.014 35/LVP-1 On the Culvert of Chalkamba to Khairaroad, Chalkamba 2.4 km

42 SND-5 112.305 36/LVP-1 On the bridge of canal crossing, Chalkambato Khaira road

43 SND-6 114.856 36/LVP-1 Top of a road stone, Chalkamba to Khaira,Chalkamba 3. 6 km

44 SND-7 113.890 37/ LVP-1 Top of km stone, Chalkamba to Khairaroad, Chalkamba 4 km

45 SND-8 117.457 37/LVP-1 On the road Culvert in village Mering46 SND-9 119.448 38/LVP-1 Top of km stone, Chalkamba to Khaira

road, Chalkamba 6 km47 SND-10 120.892 38/LVP-1 On the pedestal of Rain Gauge (Opposite of

Khaira School)48 SND-11 130.339 40/LVP-1 On the gate of Thakurani Temple, Taramala49 SND-12 131.781 41/LVP-1 On the gate of School, Taramala50 SND-13 128.247 41/LVP-1 On the Departmental BM, behind the

School, Taramala

Page 64: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.4

SL. ELEVATION (m) BENCH MARKPILLAR PAGE/LEVEL BOOK

1 104.947 WAP_S-1 1/A

2 125.936 WAP_S2 2/A

3 125.318 WAP_S3 4/A

4 124.102 WAP_S4 5/A

5 144.949 5A 6/A

6 133.452 WAP_S5 TS

7 125.919 WAP_S6 7/A

On the corner of plot (Babul tree and nala), at 225m from Nuagan

In a garden near Reserve Forest (Gunupur to Putasinga road), at 3 km fromGunupur and at 300m North of the road.

On left side of Road (Gunupur to Putasinga) at about 3km from Gunupur andnear signboard

On the rock outcrop, on left side of road (Gunupur to Putasinga) in between3~4km from Gunupur

On left side of Sana Nadi (D/S of proposed dam), near corner of Cashewgarden and about 400m from school in Village Khaira

On left side of road (Gunupur to Putasinga) at 1km from Gunupur.

On right side of Kacha road (Nuagan to Sana Nadi), at about 2km from Nuagan

On the bank of Pond (near corner of Cashew garden), at about 800 m fromNuagan

Statement showing establishment of Bench Marks along Left Main Canal ex.- Sana Nadi Dam,Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I

LOCATION DETAILS

Page 1 of 3

7 125.919 WAP_S6 7/A

8 118.033 WAP_S8 9/A

9 117.644 WAP-S9 12/A

10 120.305 WAP-S10 13/A

11 120.257 WAP-S11 32/A

12 116.917 WAP-S12 15/A

13 114.093 WAP-S13 17/A

14 110.137 WAP-S14 19/A

15 115.009 WAP-S15 20/A

16 114.630 WAP-S16 22/A

17 120.864 WAP-S-17 TS

On corner of the Plot (near Hut) at 250m from Village Katughura and road fromGunupur to Kasinagar road

On the Road left side , Village Chhanarighuda near signboard, Distance 500 mfrom Gunupur to Kasinagar road

On left side of Road (Gunupur to Shiv Temple) and road junction of Judicialcolony.

On forest land, near Slum and Housing Board colony at 350m from road(Gunupur to Kasinagar)

On minor nala near Durga Temple at 200m from Village Kharilng.

On left side of Road (Gunupur to Putasinga) at about 3km from Gunupur andnear signboard

On left side of road (Gunupur to Putasinga) at 1km from Gunupur.On a Barren Land near H.T. tower and at 400m N-W of road from Gunupur toGaribang.

On left side of Road (Gunupur to Garibangu), at about 50m from a School.

On a corner of a plot and at 550m from Village Kampaguda.

On an open land near nala and hut, at 250m from Judicial colony.

Page 1 of 3

Page 65: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.4

SL. ELEVATION (m) BENCH MARKPILLAR PAGE/LEVEL BOOK LOCATION DETAILS

18 116.78 WAP-S-18 TS

19 113.409 WAP-S19 24/A

20 124.856 WAP-S20 25/A

21 151.669 WAP-S21 26/A

22 123.601 WAP-S22 28/A

23 125.812 WAP-S23 28/A

24 124.474 WAP-S24 30/A

25 88.098 WAP-S25 TS

On the Road left side Gunupur to Kasinagar km Stone, Distance 11 km fromGunupur near Junction

On the Road left side Gunupur to Kasinagar km stone Distance 12km fromGunupur and near Durga Temple

On the nala near Barrage, Distance 700 m from Village Chinariguda

On the Plot corner, Gunupur to Kasinagar road left side, Distance 8 km fromGunupur

On the Road left side Gunupur to Kasinagar near Culvert and km Stone,Distance 9 km from Gunupur

On the Road right side Gunupur to Kasinagar near H T Pole, Distance 250 mfrom Village Kottagurha

On the Road left side Gunupur to Kasinagar km Stone Distance 10 km fromGunupur

On the Forest land near nala Distance 360 m. from nala, Distance 800 m FromVillage Vchantilaghurha

On the Forest land Forest boundary Pillar, Distance 360 m. from nala andDistance 640 m from Village Vchantilaguda ghura

Page 2 of 3

25 88.098 WAP-S25 TS

26 86.745 WAP-S26 TS

27 80.895 WAP-S27 37/A

28 86.426 WAP-S28 37/A

29 102.347 WAP-S29 40/A

30 86.795 WAP-S30 42/A

31 82.254 WAP-S-31 45/A

32 92.867 WAP-S32 47/A

33 108.361 WAP-S33 TS

34 83.350 WAP-S34 TS

In the Cashew Garden near Village Tringurha, Distance 150 m from VillageTringurha

On the Open Land near Forest Boundary Pillar and Electric Pole, Distance 125m from Village Tadmghurha

On the Forest land near nala Distance 360 m. from nala, Distance 800 m FromVillage Vchantilaghurha

On the Forest land Forest boundary Pillar, Distance 360 m. from nala andDistance 640 m from Village Vchantilaguda ghura

On the nala near Well Distance 650 m. from nala Barrage and Distance ,from 110 m. Village Vchantilaguda

On the Road left side near Hand Pump Kaandaba to Kasinagar road way toVillage Vchantilghuda and road, nala Junction

On the Open Land near Pond, Distance 300 m from Kaandaba to Kasinagarroad

On the Open Land near Hut and Forest Boundary Pillar

In the Cashew Garden near Forest Boundary Pillar, Distance 800 m fromKaandaba to Kasinagar road

On the Open Land near Pond, Distance 300 m from Kaandaba to Kasinagarroad

Page 2 of 3

Page 66: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.4

SL. ELEVATION (m) BENCH MARKPILLAR PAGE/LEVEL BOOK LOCATION DETAILS

35 87.423 WAP-S35 4/B

36 92.116 WAP-S-36 TS

37 103.740 WAP-S37 5/B

38 90.103 WAP-S38 TS

39 90.482 WAP-S39 8/B

40 88.648 WAP-S40 TS

41 93.392 WAP-S41 10/B

42 92.214 WAP-S42 10/B

On the bank of Pond near Village Sirida, Distance 150 m from Village Sirida

On the Kacha Road right side, Sirida I to Sirida II, Distance 200 m from VillageSirida and road Junction

On the Road right side, Kaandaba to Kasinagar near Culvert and Mango tree

On the Road right side , Kaandaba to Kasinagar near Culvert and CashewGarden, Distance 1300 m from Kasinagar to Gunupur, Kaandaba Junction

On the Road right side , Kaandaba to Kasinagar near Culvert and CashewGarden, Distance 20 m from Kasinagar to Gunupur, Kaandaba Junction

On the Open Land near Pond, Distance 400 m from Village Masaliguda

On the Kacha Road Right side , Masaliguda to minor Dam, Distance 140 mfrom Village Masaliguda

On the nala near Culvert, Distance 450 m from Village Sunkanpeta, Distance800 m from Village Sirida

On the bank of nala near Barrage across, Distance 370 m from VillagePapeyapeta

Page 3 of 3

42 92.214 WAP-S42 10/B

43 84.164 WAP-S-43 TS

44 83.399 WAP-S-44 TS

45 79.257 WAP-S-45 TS

46 72.070 WAP-S-46 14/B

47 67.898 WAP-S47 15/B

48 67.354 WAP-S48 TS

49 60.829 WAP-S49 17/B

50 72.714 WAP-S50 18/B

On the Kacha Road right side, Sirida I to Sirida II, Distance 200 m from VillageSirida and road Junction

On the Plot corner, on the Babool tree, Kasinagar to Paralakhemundi road,Distance 600 m from Village Kharada

On the Plot corner, on the Babool tree, Kasinagar to Paralakhemundi road,Distance 600 m from Village Kharada

On the bank of nala near Barrage across, Distance 370 m from VillagePapeyapeta

On the Kachha Road Left side near Well Tamarada to Papeyapeta, Distance150 m from Village Papeyapeta

On the Kacha Road Left side near Culvert, Distance 400 m from VillageTamarada

On the road right side Hadubhangi to Gate near culvert and Village Jayapura,Distance 600 m from Village Jayapura

On the plot corner, near nala, Distance 225 m from Jayapura and DurgaTemple

On the plot corner, near Forest Boundary Pillar Distance 225 m from Village

Page 3 of 3

Page 67: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.5

SL. ELEVATION (m)BENCH MARK

PILLAR

PAGE/LEVEL

BOOKLOCATION DETAILS

1 135.971Barrage Axis (left

end)TS On stone at left end of barrage axis.

2 123.255Barrage Axis Bank

Left sideRMC-1/6 On stone at Barrage Axis near left bank of Vansadhara River

3 132.775Barrage Axis (right

end)TS On pillar right of barrage axis near village Panidangar

4 132.596 WAP-B-0 RMC-1/47 On the back side of School Building, Panidanger

5 124.142 WAP-B-1 RMC-1/49Near (Mahul) tree and concrete electric pole located on the road

from Sanaguratha to Panidanger and at 1.3 km from Panidanger

6 127.461 WAP-B-2 RMC-1/51 In front of Primary School, Sana Routguda

7 132.142 WAP-B-3 RMC-1/52On the left side of road from Dhepagurha to Sana Routguda

approx.. 1.5 km. from Sana Routguda

8 127.442 WAP-B-4 RMC-1/56On a corner of building near Manohar Colony & left side of P.M.G.S.

Y. (Road from Dhepaguda to Gudari)

9 123.458 WAP-B-5 RMC-1/57Near Welcome gate of Maa Tarini Temple and right side of road

from Gudari to Gumuda

10 121.312 WAP-B-6 RMC-1/59 On the Corner of Temple Village Kundraguda

11 140.998 WAP-B-7 RMC-1/59On the Concrete steps near Vansadhara River, Taltampar (near

Cashew Garden)

12 123.877 WAP-B-8 RMC-1/61 Near left side of road from Gudari to Gumuda

13 125.050 WAP-B-9 RMC-1/61 Near Sign board & right side of Bridge at Bandi Nala

14 128.512 WAP-B-10 RMC-1/64On the barren land and near Pond of Revenue Village Naira & AP-

27

15 125.931 WAP-B-11 RMC-1/62 On the Corner of Pond at 500m from village Naira

16 126.733 WAP-B-12 RMC-1/66 On the bank of Pond and right side of village Chintalguda

17 133.920 WAP-B-13 RMC-1/69On the left side of road, approx. 800m from Balipanga to

Bandhaguda Kacha road

18 125.088 WAP-B-14 RMC-1/73On the right side of P.M.G.S.Y. road (Derigaon to Saraparhu) near

Culvert, approx.-1km from Derigan

19 131.359 WAP-B-15 RMC-1/76 Near Hand Pump in village Deringa guda

20 118.969 WAP-B-16 RMC-1/77On right side at Kacha road (At road curve) from Kaithapadar to

Jungle

21 123.557 WAP-B-17 TSOn the right side of road Kacha road approx.1km from (Kadamgurha

to Saripit)

Statement showing establishment of Bench Marks along Right Main Canal ex.- Vansadhara Barrage,

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I

Page 1 of 2

Page 68: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix-4.5

SL. ELEVATION (m)BENCH MARK

PILLAR

PAGE/LEVEL

BOOKLOCATION DETAILS

22 120.007 WAP-B-18 RMC-1/80Near (Usta) tree and on left side (East) of proposed RMC and

approx. 500m from Village Laxmipur.

23 122.873 WAP-B-19 RMC-1/78On the Pond & right curve of proposed RMC, located at 500m from

Gumuda to Rayagada road right side

24 119.603 WAP-B-20 RMC-1/77 Near Road Junction of Gumuda ,Gudari, Rayagada, (SH-17)

25 123.990 WAP-B-21 TSOn the Pond located left side of road & at 1km from Gumuda to

Taming Kacha road

26 120.791 WAP-B-22 RMC-1/82Near Culvert on Kacha road (Left side) from Gumuda to Taming at

2km from Gumuda

27 137.993 WAP-B-23 RMC-1/82On the left side of Kacha road from Gumuda to Taming approx.

2.5km from Gumuda (Near Retaining Wall)

28 125.570 WAP-B-24 RMC-1/83Near H T Tower and approx. 500m from the P.M.G.S.Y. road from

Ukkamba to SH-17 (Gunupur to Rayagada)

29 124.842 WAP-B-25 RMC-1/84On the right side of road junction (Kacha road) leading from

Ukkamba to SH-17 P.M.G.S.Y. at 1km from Village Guliguda

30 123.490 WAP-B-26 RMC-1/82Near Pond on the right side of road Guliguda to SH-17 at 750m from

Guliguda.

31 124.263 WAP-B-27 RMC-1/82On the road crossing of a canal at Gugligurha to Naryanguda

(Kacha Road) right side at 1km from Narayanguda.

32 123.813 WAP-B-28 RMC-1/82On the field boundary SH-17 (Gunupur to Rayagada) and right side

at 1km from Kujendri and 400m from Narayanguda.

33 127.395 WAP-B-29 RMC-1/85

On a rock outcrop and on left side of Kacha road and 300m from

Cotton Factory & 1km from P. M.G.S.Y. road (Kujendri to

Nilamguda) .

34 114.738 WAP-B-30 RMC-1/87On the bank of Pond and left side of P.M.G.S.Y. road (Kujendri to

Nilamguda) at 100m from a House.

35 112.410 WAP-B-31 RMC-1/88In the field near P.M.G.S.Y. road (Nilmguda to Gugurapang) and left

side of Culvert at 1km from Nilamguda.

36 115.699 WAP-B-32 RMC-1/88

On the Kacha road (right side) near Well, P.M.G.S.Y. Road, (Pedudi

to Haruguda), to Srirampur Kacha road, left side at 1km from

Srirampur

37 118.496 WAP-B-33 RMC-1/89On the right side of the P.M.G.S.Y. road (Pedudi to Haruguda) near

Pond at 1km from Haruguda

38 115.628 WAP-B-34 RMC-1/89On the right side of the P.M.G.S.Y. road (Pedudi to Haruguda) near

Pond at 1km from Haruguda

Page 2 of 2

Page 69: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

1 Canal off take 0 0 123.680 At Dam Axis near rock

2 AP-1L 146 50 118.527 In the barren land

3 AP-2L 331 41 120.820 Near cashew garden

4 AP-3L 717 30 123.380 Near toe of rock

5 AP-4L 929 9 124.220 Near rock under a big tree

6 AP-5R 1129 31 119.400Near rock and Unmatteled road to village

Goringa

7 CT 1215 0 118.500 Near road from Goringa to Sana Nadi

8 AP-6R 1417 80 119.160 Near cashew tree and pond

9 AP-7L 1969 71 121.200 Near rock

10 AP-8R 2369 30 119.354 Near traverse point TC--36

11 AP-9L 2609 82 119.554 At 60m from a hut

12 AP-10R 3149 57 120.500 Near pond and T.B.M. -S-3

13 AP-11R 3477 40 118.800 Near nala and cashew garden

14 Nala 3550 0 117.900 Near nala crossing

15 AP-12R 4497 7 119.700 In the dense forest

16 AP-13L 4845 8 119.800 Near rock and small pond

17 AP-14L 5181 75 120.000 Between two big rocks

18 AP-15L 5421 15 119.750Near forest boundary pillar and Mahua

tree

19 AP-16R 5677 14 120.425 Between two stones and in dense forest

20 AP-17L 5945 58 122.000 Near forest boundary pillar

21 AP-18R 6065 6 117.680 In the dense forest

22 AP-19R 6373 15 118.564 In the dense forest

23 AP-20L 6685 4 122.080 80 m away from Travers point TC-80

24 CL 6875 0 119.217On the left side of road Gunupur to

Putasing

List of Apex points of L.M.C. offtaking from Dam across Sana Nadi near Village Khaira

Lower Vansadhra Project

Page 1 of 7

Page 70: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

25 CL 6902 0 117.910On the right side of road Gunupur to

Putasing

26 AP-21R 7021 64 118.800Gunupur to putasingh road right side

Distance-33 m.

27 AP-22R 7269 38 118.300 Between earthen cut and small nala

28 AP-23L 7685 19 117.840 Between earthen cut and small nala

29 CL 8450 0 116.197 At nala crossing

30 AP-24L 8933 68 120.300Near Junction of unmettaled road & road

Gunupur to putasing

31 AP-25L 9153 31 117.900 Near TC-104 and between two stones

32 AP-26R 9361 81 117.400 Between two stones

33 AP-27R 9569 19 119.451Near corner of cashew garden and small

nala

34 AP-28L 9789 55 117.331 In the cashew garden

35 AP-29L 9953 26 117.300 Near HT power line and T.B.M S-9

36 CL 10269 0 116.950On the left side of road Gunupur to

Garhiabangu

37 CL 10275 0 116.710On the right side of road Gunupur to

Garhiabangu

38 AP-30L 10537 16 115.860 In the cashew garden

39 CL 10575 0 115.300 At nala crossing

40 AP-31R 10749 58 118.450 Near nala and H T Line pole

41 CL 10850 0 118.290 At valley

42 AP-32L 12341 25 121.000 Near nala and a hut

43 AP-33R 12573 11 117.660 On the rock near forest boundary pillar

45 CL 12769 0 117.800On road from Gunupur Tehesil building to

Shiv Temple

46 AP-35L 12881 42 119.170 Near school and forest boundary pillar

47 AP-36L 13105 30 113.403 On the rock near nala

48 AP-37R 13421 12 117.870 Near Housing Board colony

49 AP-38R 13673 27 113.940 On the barren land near nala

50 CL 13935 0 113.400 At valley

Page 2 of 7

Page 71: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

51 AP-39R 14233 68 115.990 On the corner of cashew garden

52 SH-4 14640 0 109.601On the left side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar (SH-4)

53 AP-40L 14657 83 109.1On the right side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar (SH-4)

54 CT 14708 0 109On the right side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar (SH-4)

55 CL 15000 0 103.46 At nala crossing

56 Valley 15347 0 104.55 At nala crossing

57 CT 15565 0 106.91 Road Gunupur to college

58 AP-41L 16217 45 115.11In the barren land near village

Koragurha

59 SH-4 16422 0 121.2On the right side of road Gunupur to

Narsingguda

60 AP-42R 16945 40 118.850 Near big tree and small nala

61 CL 17600 0 118.310 Near village Chinariguda

62 AP-43R 17845 52 115.140 In the barren land near nala and Dam

63 AP-44R 18137 38 115.200 On the field boundary near Barrage

64 CL 18700 0 112.301 At nala crossing

65 AP-45L 19065 50 115.310 Near H T Pole and nala

66 AP-46L 19325 19 117.360 Near H T Pole and electric pole

67 SH-4 19395 0 118.640On the left side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar (SH-4)

68 SH-4 19417 0 119.624On the right side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar (SH-4)

69 AP-47R 19865 1 124.900 Near H T Pole and nala

70 AP-48L 20457 10 132.000 Near H T Pole and nala

71 CL 21268 0 132.800 On the Pond near village Kottagurha

72 AP-49L 21817 58 122.570Near kachha road Kottagurha to

Gudinguda

73 AP-50R 22725 30 117.260 At field boundary

74 AP-51R 23153 47 115.900 At field boundary

75 AP-51A-R 23337 25 119.230 At field boundary near village Yapaguda

Page 3 of 7

Page 72: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

76 CL 22956 0 119.000On the left side of road SH-4 to

Khandava

77 AP-51B-L 23569 23 108.030On the left side of road SH-4 to

Khandava

78 AP-51C-L 23805 20 105.005On the left side of road SH-4 to

Khandava

79 CL 24500 0 97.340 At nala crossing

80 AP-54L 25037 10 116.100 On the rock in dense forest

81 AP-55L 25377 14 114.300 On the rock in dense forest

82 AP-56R 25593 88 119.415 On the rock in dense forest

83 AP-57R 26065 14 111.600 On the rock in dense forest

84 AP-58L 26365 38 119.540 On the rock and forest boundary pillar

85 AP-59L 26653 30 117.100On the rock toe and forest boundary pillar

near cashew garden

86 AP-60L 27121 6 110.020 On the toe of big stone in forest land

87 AP-61R 27709 47 98.557 On the stone near nala

89 AP-62R 28137 97 100.241 In the cashew garden

90 AP-63R 28497 12 111.700On the corner of pond and near very deep

earthen cut

91 AP-64L 28885 65 111.000 On the rock near forest boundary pillar

92 AP-65L 29077 56 99.750 On the rock near forest boundary pillar

93 AP-66R 29373 22 99.958On the rock near pond of village

Chantnguda

94 AP-67L 29541 28 102.080On the rock near unmattled road of

village Chantnguda

95 AP-68L 29689 1 100.320Near unmettled road and forest boundary

pillar

96 AP-69R 29881 5 101.926Near hut, TS-284 and forest boundary

pillar

97 AP-70L 30057 28 100.113 In the cashew garden

98 AP-71L 30453 1 102.470In the cashew garden near forest

boundary pillar

99 AP-72L 30653 26 99.400 In the cashew garden near TS-309 , 310

100 AP-73R 30925 8 109.720 In the cashew garden

101 AP-74R 31137 25 100.534In the cashew garden near very big stone

and village Taringuda

Page 4 of 7

Page 73: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

102 AP-75L 31433 21 99.680 In the cashew garden near Electric pole

103 AP-76L 31765 56 100.957 On the rock near village Chetanguda

104 AP-77R 32085 52 95.310In the cashew garden and near new pond

village Gauriguda

105 AP-78R 32449 54 99.010 In the cashew garden and near TS-340

106 AP-79L 32733 50 100.343In the cashew garden near forest

boundary pillar

107 AP-80L 33193 15 102.260 On the rock near TS-354

108 AP-81R 33453 18 99.850 On the rock near forest boundary pillar

109 AP-82L 33937 20 99.300On the rock near forest boundary pillar

and small nala

110 AP-83L 34257 30 99.208 In the cashew garden

112 AP-85R 34552 53 99.726In the cashew garden near new kacha

road

113 AP-86R 34980 55 100.650 In the cashew garden

114 AP-87L 36200 8 102.400 In the cashew garden near hut

115 AP-88R 36352 36 101.165 In the cashew garden

116 AP-89R 36620 1 98.750 On the corner of pond near signboard

117 AP-90R 36820 9 100.620On the corner of cashew garden near

hut

118 AP-91L 37220 1 105.186 In the cashew garden near TS-417

119 AP-92R 37540 43 106.378In the cashew garden near TS-424 and

big tree

120 AP-93L 37828 64 106.512 On the rock near Eucaliptis garden

121 AP-94L 38044 17 100.100On the rock near Eucaliptis garden and

road SH-4 to Khandava

122 AP-95L 38484 5 98.210On the right side of the road SH-4 to

Khandava near culvert

123 AP-96R 38772 31 99.270On the right side of the road SH-4 to

Khandava

124 AP-97R 39180 16 99.859On the right side of the road SH-4 to

Khandava

125 CL 38371 0 98.770On the right side of road SH-4 to

Khandava

126 CL 38690 0 98.260 On the right side of road SH-4

127 CL 38710 0 98.500On the left side of road Gunupur to

Kashinagar

Page 5 of 7

Page 74: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

128 AP-98L 40228 7 113.930At the junction of road (Gunupur to

Kashinagar) and road from Laxmipuram

130 AP-99L 41104 2 99.600 In the forest land near TS-473

131 AP-100L 41664 26 101.000 In the barren land near pond

132 AP-101L 42229 25 100.050On the corner of rock near village

Masaliguda

133 AP-102R 42509 74 97.675On the rock near village Masaliguda and

pond

134 AP-103L 42713 38 106.260 On the rock near forest boundary pillar

135 AP-104L 42963 63 99.550 On the corner of rock near nala

136 AP-105L 43467 35 89.750 On the corner of rock near nala

137 AP-106R 43857 52 89.601 Near village Sirada between two rocks

138 AP-107R 44207 65 92.460 In the cashew garden near village Sirada

144 AP-109L 45057 30 94.450 On the rock near nala

145 AP-110R 45277 32 89.965 On the rock near nala

147 AP-112L 45532 7 93.300 On the rock

148 AP-113L 45860 19 89.540 In the barren land near new road

149 AP-114R 46327 39 83.650On the barren land near new road and

cashew garden

150 AP-115R 46882 2 72.850On the barren land between village

Peddaguda I & II

151 CL 46450 0 82.460On the Left side of road villageTarmada

to Peddaguda

152 AP-116L 47612 25 74.270 Near Banana garden

154 AP-117R 48592 2 78.542

On right side of the road village

Hadabhangi to Babanguda near cashew

garden

157 AP-118R 48812 11 78.580 In the barren land near village Jeypuram

159 AP-119R 49124 30 78.475On the kacha road near Mango garden

and village Jeypuram

160 AP-120L 49460 39 80.650 On the rock near village Jeypuram

161 AP-121L 49620 43 78.090 In the forest land near unmettled road

162 AP-122L 49848 30 79.850 On the rock near tree

Page 6 of 7

Page 75: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure-4.6

Sl. No.Apex number

& directionRD (m)

Deflection

Angle (Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

163 AP-123L 50068 36 75.206 Near a rock

164 AP-124R 50206 48 77.288 On the field boundary

165 AP-125R 50542 19 76.814 On the stone

166 AP-126L 50852 18 70.402 On the stone near kacha well

167 AP-127R 51100 25 71.800 On the forest land near TS-550

168 AP-128L 51360 29 76.333 On the forest land near small rock

169P.M.G.S.Y.

Road51392 0 77.500

Road crossing village Navada to

Mahasingiguda

170P.M.G.S.Y.

Road51408 0 77.500

Road crossing village Navada to

Mahasingiguda

171 AP-129L 51672 30 74.350 On the forest land near pond

172 AP-130L 51992 32 77.200 On the rock near small nala

173 AP-131L 52172 34 78.400 On the rock near nala

174 Nala 52302 0 80.118 At nala crossing

175 AP-132R 52432 48 76.300Near Culvert road village Navada to

Mahasingiguda

176 AP-133R 53420 25 79.585 Near pond

177 AP-134R 54296 50 78.935 On the field boundary

178 Tail 54400 14 77.540 In the forest land

Page 7 of 7

Page 76: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure 4.7

Sl.

No.

Apex number &

directionRD (m)

Deflection angle

(Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

1 AP-0 0 0 128.770 On rock near Barrage Axis

2 AP-1L 290 33 130.000 In the Cashew Garden

3 Nala 950 0 121.210 At nala crossing

4 AP-2R 1011 28 122.600 Near Nala and Electric pole

5 AP-3R 1365 34 127.680 In the forest near Nala

6 Nala 2050 0 125.050 At nala crossing

7 AP-4L 2125 28 126.000 On the field boundary near village Routguda

8 AP-5L 2757 28 126.700 Near Pond

9 CT 2885 0 129.340At crossing of road village Dhepaguda to

Sana Routguda

10 Nala 3050 0 127.490 At nala crossing

11 Nala 3350 0 129.500 At nala crossing

12 AP-6R 4032 20 128.900 Near Mango tree

13P.M.G.S.Y.

Road4100 0 126.940 Road crossing village Dhepaguda to Gudari

14 AP-7L 4221 50 123.500 In the Cashew Garden near Elect. pole

15 Nala 4550 0 120.000 At nala crossing

16 AP-8L 4691 35 123.940 Near Nala

17 AP-9R 4984 39 128.000 On the toe of rock near Elect. Pole

18 CT 5100 0 127.260 Road crossing village Gudari to Mata Temple

19 AP-10R 5201 52 125.100On the right side of Road village Gudari to

Gumuda

20 AP-11L 5327 6 126.500On the right side of Road village Gudari to

Gumuda near stairs of temple

21 AP-12L 5395 17 127.100On the right side of Road village Gudari to

Gumuda

22 AP-13R 5501 22 136.500On the right side of Road village Gudari to

Gumuda near culvert

23 AP-14L 5622 36 128.000On the right side of Road village Gudari to

Gumuda

24 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 5700 0 130.800 Road -crossing village Gudari to Gumuda

25 AP-15L 5859 16 117.600 On the rock near village Kundraguhra

Statement showing details of Apex points of R.M.C. offtaking from Barrage across Vansadhara

River

Lower Vansdhara Project (Odisha)

Page 1 of 5

Page 77: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure 4.7

Sl.

No.

Apex number &

directionRD (m)

Deflection angle

(Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

26 Nala 6000 0 118.550 At nala crossing

27 AP-16L 6050 14 119.550 On the rock near Nala

28 AP-17R 6189 69 126.000 On the rock near Nala

29 Road 6500 0 122.270 Road village Taltampar to River

30 AP-18R 6603 12 125.100 In the forest near Nala

31 Valley 6700 0 121.000 At valley

32 Nala 7000 0 123.400 At nala crossing

33 AP-19R 7360 41 126.200 Near small Cashew Garden

34 AP-20R 7365 41 126.500 Near small Cashew Garden

35 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 7700 0 124.750 Road crossing village Gudari to Gumuda

36 AP-21R 7834 50 125.000 Near Pond of village Baligurha

37 AP-22L 8109 90 122.100 On field boundary

38 CT 8346 0 119.600 CT Crossing village Baligurha to Dhepaguda

39 Nala 8400 0 118.090 At nala crossing

40 AP-23L 8474 62 123.500 Near Nala

41 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 8970 0 119.874 Near road village Gudari to Gumuda

42 Nala 9050 0 115.790 At nala crossing (Bandinala)

43 AP-24R 9533 8 122.500 In the barren land

44 Valley 10030 0 125.400 At valley

45 AP-25R 10092 77 125.500 In the barren land near Nala

46 AP-26L 10321 66 132.000 In the barren land near Nala

47 AP-27L 10853 37 127.600 In the barren land near Pond

48 Valley 11318 0 126.400 At valley

49 AP-28R 11438 56 125.500 In small Cashew Garden

50 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 11600 0 125.120Road crossing village Sahidnagar to Baliguda

near Naira chowk

51 AP-29R 12065 28 125.118 Near Elect. pole village Nairaguda

52 Nala 12700 0 124.230 At nala crossing

53 CT 13000 0 128.840 Road crossing village Chinthalguda to Hill

Page 2 of 5

Page 78: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure 4.7

Sl.

No.

Apex number &

directionRD (m)

Deflection angle

(Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

54 AP-30L 13038 6 127.500 Near Pond and culvert

55 AP-31L 13618 61 128.500 Near Pond

56 AP-32R 14086 20 123.600 On the field boundary

57 CT 14500 0 134.860On the right side of the road village Balipanga

to Bandaguda

58 AP-33R 14795 18 126.500 Near Pond

59 AP-34R 15000 34 124.030 Near Cashew Garden

60 Nala 15200 0 120.110 At nala crossing

61 AP-35L 15291 70 126.000 On the field boundary

62 Nala 15550 0 123.960 At nala crossing

63P .M.G.S.Y.

Road15450 0 126.720

Left side of road village Derigan to Saraparhu

near electric pole

64 AP-36L 15824 22 123.800 Near Road

65 Nala 16150 0 122.590 At nala crossing

66 AP-37R 16503 64 130.900On the corner of Cashew Garden near village

Deringamgurha

67 AP-38L 16689 3 131.718On the corner of Cashew Garden near village

Deringamgurha

68 CT 17000 0 129.530 Road crossing village Derigan to Hill

69 AP-39L 17201 28 123.150 Near hut

70 Nala 17250 0 123.280 At nala crossing

71 AP-40L 17508 22 124.200 Near new Pond

72 CT 17650 0 126.180 Road crossing village Kaithapadar to Hill

73 AP-41R 17832 74 126.100 Near hut

74 AP-42L 18032 59 121.100 Near new Pond

75 Nala 18150 0 119.480 At nala crossing

76 AP-43R 18634 5 123.400 On the barren land

77 CT 18800 0 123.430 Road crossing village Derigan to Hill

78 Valley 19100 0 119.670 At valley

79 Valley 19400 0 118.190 At valley

80 AP-44L 19570 13 117.000Corner of Cashew Garden near village

Lakshmipur

81 AP-45L 20423 49 121.485 Near Pond

Page 3 of 5

Page 79: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure 4.7

Sl.

No.

Apex number &

directionRD (m)

Deflection angle

(Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

82 AP-46R 20726 61 124.800 Near Pond

83 SH-17 20930 0 125.340Road crossing village Gumuda to Raygada (SH-

17)

84 AP-47L 21020 3 125.700 On the corner of Cashew Garden

85 21300 0 122.140

86 Nala 21550 0 116.510 At nala crossing

87 AP-48L 21753 72 119.150 In the barren land

88 AP-49R 22413 90 124.250 In the Cashew Garden

89 CT 22750 0 125.110 Road crossing village Gumuda to Taming

90 Nala 23550 0 108.520 At nala crossing

91 AP-50L 23804 50 114.000 Near Hut

92 AP-51L 24427 51 120.000 Near Hut

93 Valley 24450 0 119.220 At valley

94 Valley 24900 0 121.110 At valley

95 AP-52R 25520 24 128.750 In the garden

96 CT 25830 0 126.210 Road crossing village Radigurha to Taming

97 Nala 26200 0 120.070 At nala crossing

99 AP-53R 26356 13 121.200 Near Hut

98 CT 26450 0 121.570 Road crossing village Tickrpudha to field

100 AP-54R 26841 24 120.600 Near Pond

101 Valley 27200 0 123.030 At valley

102 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 27450 0 124.050Road crossing village Ukumbha to SH-17

(Gunupur to Raygada)

103 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 27800 0 121.950Near road crossing village Gugligurah to SH-

17

104 CT 28750 0 120.510At crossing of road village Narayanguda

Colony to SH-17

105 Valley 28800 0 120.070 Valley

106 SH-17 29150 0 123.800AT crossing of road MDRB-2 (Gunupur to

Raygada)

107 AP-55R 29229 47 123.300 On the field boundary

108 AP-56L 29599 63 125.200 Near Nala

Page 4 of 5

Page 80: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure 4.7

Sl.

No.

Apex number &

directionRD (m)

Deflection angle

(Degree)Elevation (m) Remarks

110 AP-57L 29789 64 123.700 Near Hut and Pond

109 Nala 29850 0 119.120 At nala crossing

112 AP-58R 29968 7 120.800 In open land

111 Valley 30050 0 121.500 At valley

113 AP-59R 31028 41 123.800 On the corner of Eucalyptus Garden

114 AP-60R 31759 62 122 Near P.M.G.S.Y. Road

115 AP-61R 31892 9 122.2 On the forest land near P.M.G.S.Y. Road

116 AP-62L 32068 75 122.5On the forest land near P.M.G.S.Y. Road and

Cashew Garden

117 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 32200 0 117.79 Crossing road village Kujendri to Nilamguda

118 AP-63R 33173 24 111.7 In the Open land

119 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 33300 0 112.750At crossing of road village Nilamguda to

Gugarpadu

120 Nala 33650 0 100.770 At crossing of Pedagurha Nala

121 AP-64L 33859 59 112.500 On the barren land near Cashew Garden

122 Nala 34900 0 116.060 At nala crossing

124 AP-65R 35045 52 120.800 In the Cashew Garden

123 CT 35150 0 123.480 At CT crossing village Parirhi to Gugarpadu

125 Nala 35350 0 122.790 At nala crossing

127 AP-66L 35550 4 122.100In the barren land right side of the road village

Parirhi to Harhugurha

126 P.M.G.S.Y. Road 35650 0 121.750Near road crossing village Parirhi to

Harhugurha

128 Valley 35860 0 120.076 At valley

129 Valley 36180 0 120.050 At valley

130 Tail 36450 118.675 Tail

Page 5 of 5

Page 81: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Annexure- 4.8

Sl. No.Apex number &

directionChainage(m)

Deflection

(degree)Elevation(m)

1 offtake 0 126.876

2 1R 116 7 130.800

3 2L 451 63 127.100

4 3L 611 4 126.300

5 4R 828 49 125.050

6 5R 1454 22 127.000

7 6L 1783 67 129.100

8 7R 1894 48 132.300

9 8L 2115 47 131.200

10 9L 2552 9 125.685

11 10L 2771 15 122.800

12 11R 3061 11 123.400

13 12L 3267 46 126.300

14 13L 3406 57 126.147

15 14R 3735 27 125.600

16 15L 3965 38 126.000

17 16L 4266 37 132.000

18 17R 5144 36 125.000

19 18R 5406 27 126.100

20 19L 5602 16 127.000

21 20R 5758 46 129.500

22 21R 5965 29 126.200

23 22L 6241 43 123.200

24 23R 6583 29 126.000

25 24L 6981 26 127.000

26 25L 7157 43 126.000

27 26L 7322 29 128.000

28 27R 7588 15 125.000

29 28L 8183 24 124.858

30 29R 8507 59 125.906

31 30R 8757 37 126.000

32 31L 9039 47 126.450

33 32R 9251 90 125.070

34 Tail 9350 124.069

Statement showing position of Apex points of Gudari Distributary

ex.-Panidangar Barrage.

Page 82: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Appendix - 4.9

Sl. No. Northing (m) Easting (m)

1 2145437.000 796696.000

2 2145465.000 790765.675

3 2145628.243 790894.493

4 2145745.101 790738.214

5 2145608.313 790580.205

6 2145777.740 790539.637

7 2145928.789 790610.102

8 2146074.716 790518.246

9 2146136.500 790451.648

10 2146435.571 790499.997

11 2146556.014 790261.344

12 2147129.235 790505.361

13 2147230.702 790715.903

14 2147297.146 790791.444

15 2147431.171 790788.878

16 2147607.287 790750.503

17 2147665.678 790665.396

18 2147831.297 790641.737

19 2147891.149 790614.416

20 2148001.135 790659.595

21 2148339.853 790344.416

22 2148184.864 790175.289

23 2148554.603 789991.335

24 2148122.487 789825.899

25 2147802.335 789737.799

26 2147408.897 789479.270

27 2146483.348 789851.315

28 2146095.433 789818.397

29 2146029.602 789926.922

30 2145667.110 789874.797

31 2145583.666 790063.706

32 2145484.340 789871.544

Statement showing position of pillars along

submergence periphery at pond level RL. 128 m of

Vansadhara Barrage, Panidangar.

Page 83: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER 6

HYDRO-GEOLOGY

6.1 GENERAL:

The Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I envisages construction of a 2600 m long Earthen

Dam and 1400 m long Earthen Dyke across Sananadi a tributary of Vanasadhara River on

left side out falling near Gunupur at 19° 8’17.4” N latitude and 83°52’39” E longitude near

village Khaira in (near Gunupur) Rayagada district of Odisha with an ogee spillway of

213m length. The Left Main Canal having length of 54.40 km off takes from Earthen Dam

and irrigates 12946 ha CCA with several distribution Canal Systems. The F.S.L at Head of

Left Main Canal is kept 120 m.

Further, a Barrage of length 426.5 m is also proposed to construct on Vansadhara River near

village Panidangar (near Gudari) with 19° 22’53.5” N latitude and 83°45’39.7” E longitude.

The Right Main Canal having length of 36.45 km off-takes from proposed Barrage and

irrigates 8105 ha CCA with its system. Further, 9.35 km long Guddari distributary offtaking

from left bank of Panidangar Barrage irrigates 1099 ha of CCA. The FSL at the head of both

the canals is 126.5 m. The annual irrigation is for an area of 20843 ha with an intensity of

85% and 71% respectively during Kharif and Rabi season. The area irrigated during Kharif

is 11004 ha while area irrigated during Rabi is 9192 ha.

6.2 GROUND WATER AVAIBILITY

Geologically the Rayagarh and Gajapati districts comprise mostly fissured hard rocks which

mostly comprise charnockites, khondalites, quartizites, gneisses, schists, granite of different

states of igneous and metamorphic rocks. These rocks posses negligible primary porosity

but attain porosity & permeability due to fracturing and weathering. Ground water yield also

depends on the rock type & possibly on the grade of metamorphism.

The ground water in the district occurs in weathered and fracture hard rocks. The ground

water depth in the district varies from 5 to 15 m below ground level. The weathered and

fractured rock aquifer systems are capable of producing water supply of 150 to 250 Lts /

min. i.e. 2.5 to 4.2 lps.

Page 84: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-276-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Tubewell to a depth of 100 – 150 m can be successfully constructed in the hard rock.

Projected Ground Water availability for future irrigation in the district of Rayagada is 53864

ha m after use of domestic and industrial use upto year 2025. The stage of ground water

development is 13% as per 2009 estimates vide Annexure-I. Projected Dynamic Ground

Water Resource Map of Rayagarh District is enclosed vide annexure-II.

6.3 HYDRO-GEOLOGY

Hydrogeology is both descriptive and an analytical science. It encompasses the inter

relationships of geologic materials and process with water. The physiography, surficial

geology and topography of a basin, together with the vegetation, influence the relationship

between precipitation over the basin and water draining from it. Running water and

groundwater are geologic agents that help shape the land. The movement and chemistry of

groundwater are heavily dependent upon topography & geology. The hydrogeology and

geochemistry of the basin needs to be investigated particularly for a groundwater resources

development project.

6.4 STRUCTURE AND TECTONICS

The regional trend in the Eastern Ghats belt is dominantly N.E. – S.W. in the south –

western part (Koraput district) which gradually changes to N.-S. in the western part (

Kalahandi district ) and then to E.N.E.- W.S.W. through N.E.- S.W. in the northern part .

The E.N.E.- W.S.W. trend in the Bolangir district abruptly changes to N.W.- S.E. trend (

Mahanadi trend ) and continues in the north – eastern part of the orogen ( eastern Phulbani ,

Dhenkanal, Cuttack and Puri District ) until it disappears under the coastal sedimentary

cover . This spectacular change in the trend is considered to be due to major cross folding

alone a N.W. – S.E. axis. That superimposed or cross folding had taken place is amply

evidenced from the result of structural studies carried out several workers in part of the belt.

Further, it is likely that the emplacement of the anorthosite bodies in the Puri and Bolangir

districts is controlled by these cross fold movements. The abrupt change in Mahanadi trend

in the north – eastern part is interpreted to be due either to the presence of large steeply

plunging folds or to the later movement on the marginal part of the craton (Chatterji et al,

1971).

Page 85: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-276-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

6.5 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY

Forming a part of the north-eastern extension of the peninsular shield, Orissa is by and large

underlain by Precambrian rocks. A little less than 25 per cent of the total area of the State is

constituted of the phenerozoic rocks, Quaternary formations and the Recent to Sub – Recent

alluvium. These latter are chiefly confined to the coastal tracts and the Brahmani and

Mahanadi valleys.

The Precambrian rocks are represented by politic, psammitic, pasamopelitic with

subordinate psephitic and calcareous rocks, metamorphosed in several grades and

structurally deformed different intensities, and transformed to various degrees. These

sediments and meta sediments occur as dissected patches separated by vast stretches of

granites, ortho – and Para – gneisses, injection gneisses, migmatites, Charnockites and basic

and ultra basic intrusive and effusive rocks mostly of mafic composition.

Represented among the Precambrian are the rocks of different faces reflecting the widely

varying tectonic environment in which they were deposited and / or emplaced. The tectonic

– sedimentary environments range from little differentiated (tectonically) permobile stage to

well differentiated platform – geosynclinals conditions.

The phenerozoic rocks are represented by the Gondwana Super – Group encompassing

upper paleozoic to Middle Mesozoic, and the Baripada Beds of Lower Tertiary. The

Gondwanas are of non – marine continental facies , and the Lower Tertiary rocks indicate a

marine environment.

The stratigraphy of the different groups of rocks is compiled from the work of the various

geologists both within and outside the Department. The basis of sub – division, particularly

of the Precambrian together with the lithostraigraphic of each group is briefly discussed

below:

The stratigraphic sub – division of the Precambrian is a widely discussed problem in view

of the inherent difficulties of classifying over three million years of the Earth’s history

which is scarcely recorded in any from other than the different types of litho genesis. In

Page 86: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-376-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

India considerable interest is being evinced in recent years as more and more radiometric

age data on rocks is becoming available

Subdivision of the Precambrian is primarily dependent on the ability to recognise natural

stages of geological history which are characterised by definite types of litho genesis

determined by the interplay of specific tectonic and geochemical environment (Salop

1972). Tectonic cycles, a combinations of tectonics, magnetism and metamorphism serve as

the main basis for limiting the time boundary between any two rock assemblages recognised

in space.

A combination of geological and radiometric age data will afford the best result in rock

classification. A synthesis of all the available data has recently been made by Chatterji and

Banerji ( 1971 ) who have provisionally suggested that the precambrains of India be

subdivided into two Supper – Group , viz., the Riphean and Pre – Riphean . All the rock

older than 1,400 m.y. is to be described as Pre – Riphean while those having ages between

600 and 1,400 m.y. as Riphean. The platform cover rocks which may be younger than 600

m.y. may be termed Vendian. More recently Salop (1972) presented the main principles

which constitute the basis for a unified stratigraphic scale for the Precambrian

In the stratigraphic – tectonic classification of the Precambrian in Orissa, an attempt is

made to follow the main principles formulated by Salop (1972), although the meagre

radiometric data available proved a major hurdle in making the sub – division more

unambiguous. The sub – division adopted is presented in Table 1 where the relegation of the

different groups into the broad framework suggested by Chatterji and Banerjee (1971) is

also shown.

Pre – Riphean Supergroup

The stratigraphic succession of the rocks of the Group emerging from the recent work of the

officers of the Department is as follows:-

Porphyritic granite, porphyritic granite gneiss and augen gneiss

-------------------------------- intrusive contact ----------------------------------

Leptynites , streaky granulites and garnetiferous granite gneiss

Page 87: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-476-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Charnockite suite of rocks

Pyroxene granulites

Khondalite suit – garnet – sillimanite gneiss , graphitic gneiss , garnetiferous

Quartzite , calc – silicate granulites , etc .

Rocks of this Group are distributed in the Puri, Ganjam, Phulbani, Koraput, Kalahandi,

Bolangir, Jabalpur, Dhenkanal and Cuttack district. Broadly they are grouped into the

khondalite suite of rocks comprising the metamorphosed sediment of argillaceous,

arinaceous and calcareous composition and the charnockite suite .

The highly aluminous meta sediments are chiefly represented by the Khondalite composed

essentially of quartz – garnet – potash feldspar – sillimanite with or without graphite. Gray

to pink coloured quartzites with garnet and occasionally fine needles of sillimanite occur

interbanded with khondalite . The calc – silicate granulites composed of diopside – scapplite

granulites with wollastonite occur as concordant bands with other metasediments .

Pyroxene granulites, also known as the mafic granulites or comprising two type of pyroxene

– granulites , i.e ., ortho – and clinopyroxene granulites , occur as small lenses or thin bands

conformable with the meta sediments . They are also found as inclusions in the charnockite

suite of rocks suggesting their older age . These rocks are homogeneous granulitic rocks

carrying sub – calcic plagioclase , orthopyroxene , and light green clinopyroxene , quartz ,

garnet , pleochroic hornblende and biotite . The consensus of opinion is that these rocks

represent original mafic igneous rocks either as sills or flows metamorphosed into the mafic

granulites along with the enclosing sediments.

The Charnockite suite comprises the acid with orthopyroxene – quartz – potash feldspar

(garnet) and the genetically related rocks like alaskites , enderbites and hypersthene – quartz

– syenites . The intermediate type of charnockite represents hybrid types with the mafic and

portions distributed irregularly as patches or arranged in parallel bands .

The leptynites including the garnetiferous granite – gneisses occur generally as bands along

the contact regions of khondalites with charnockites and granite gneisses . Granite gneisses ,

next to charnockites and khondalites , occupy larger tracts of the Eastern Ghats in Orissa .

Page 88: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –VI-576-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

They vary from syn – tectonic medium – grained grey gneisses to post – tectonic coarse

granites and porphyroblastic gneisses

Post – tectonic magmatism in the Eastern Ghats belt is manifested in the intrusion of

anorthosites and alkaline rocks either along the axial regions of cross folds or along ae

echelon shears or dislocation zones. Coarse – grained anorthosites grading to gabbroic rocks

are reported from two localities near Banpur in Puri district and near Bolangir in Bolangir

district , each occuping an area of over 300 Sq Km. Two minor patches are also reported

from angul area . Dhenkanal district , and from Turkel area , Kalahandi district . The alkali

rocks are represented by alkali – gabbro , calc – alkali syenite perthite syenite and nepheline

syenite in Koraput district ; perthite syenites with nepheline and nephelinites in Kalahandi

district and biotite syenite in Sambalpur district .

The mineral assemblages of the rocks of this group , particularly the two types of pyroxene

granulites , are characteristic of high pressure – high temperature regional metamorphism of

granulite facies . Regional retrogression has lowered the facies of metamorphism of

metamorphism of granulite facies . Regional retrogression has lowered the facies of

metamorphism as evidenced by the presence of assemblages typical of hornblende –

granulite and almandine – amphibolite facies. Polymetamorphism is suggest by the

occurrence of politic assemblages such as sillimanite – garnet – biotite – potash feldspar ,

cordierite – garnet – hypersthene – biotite – plagioclase etc .

6.6 MINERAL OCCERENCES

6.6.1 Graphite

Graphite deposits occur in association with the Eastern Ghat rock types of Precambrian age.

They are found along the contact zone of khondalitic rocks with the granite gneiss,

associated with the pegmatite bodies. The deposits appear to be epigenetic in origin and are

structurally controlled along the foliation, fracture planes and fault zones. The ore is erratic

in behaviour and occurs in small veins over strike lengths of a few metres to 200 m. The

thickness also varies from a few centimetres to three metres. The mineral is flaky and

crystalline in nature and its carbon content from 30 % to as much as 80% .

Page 89: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8-1Haryana –122015

CHAPTER -8

RESERVOIR SIMULTION

8.0 SIMULATION

Reservoirs provide the principal means by which the flow pattern in the river can be

controlled in a way that the available water becomes more useful for various purposes

such as irrigation, municipal, hydropower and industrial supply etc. The reservoir

operation during planning stage aims at testing the performance of the reservoir or a

system of reservoirs and to derive the operating rules. When the reservoirs are built they

are required to be operated in the manner to achieve the best out of the system.

Reservoir Operation, single or multipurpose, essentially implies obtaining the most

objective oriented inter-relation between the governing variables and parameters viz.

inflows, demands, releases, storages and losses such as evaporation and seepage at any

time period. The inter relation between above variables and parameters is basically a

mass balance equation.

Reservoir operating procedures are needed and used for guiding operators i.e.

maintaining set of storage and release values that would satisfy all the water users. Ideal

storage volumes or levels in individual reservoirs are typically defined by Rule Curves.

When conditions are not ideal, operating policies define, what should be done for various

combinations of system states and hydrologic conditions. The rule curves and operating

policies together define desired storage volumes or levels, reservoirs releases and

diversion quantities at specified reliability. The purpose of operating policies is to

distribute any necessary deviations from ideal conditions in a manner that satisfies

mandated laws or regulations and/or minimizes the total perceived discomfort or hard

ship to all water users in the system.

8.1 AVAILABLE DATA FOR SIMULATION

Reservoir simulation for dam on Sana Nadi at Khaira and barrage on Vansadhara river

near Panidonger have been carried out based on the following data:

Page 90: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8-2Haryana –122015

a) Monthly Discharge Data for the period 1971-72 to 2010-11 (i.e. 40 years data) for

Sana Nadi and Vansadhara river.

b) Revised area capacity curve after taking into consideration the sedimentation effect as

work out in Chapter-V (Hydrology)

c) Monthly Evaporation loss (in mm) data have been taken as follows:

Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May

222 76 76 89 83 70 57 83 95 190 254 381

d) FRL, MDDL were taken as per the topographic condition, submergence and other

criteria used for fixation of these levels.

8.2RESERVOIR SIMULATION STUDIES

The hydrology series from 1971-72 to 2010-11 has been considered to carry out the

reservoir simulation studies on monthly basis with the rule curve for the reservoir level

obtained from minimization of irrigation deficit. The pattern of water availability on

monthly basis reveals that the water availability in the month of May also corresponds to

lean flow and the effect of rains in increasing the water availability starts from the month of

June onwards. The hydrological year for reservoir simulation studies, therefore, has been

considered from the month of June to May. The reservoir levels have been varied

depending upon the quantum of water in the reservoir.

For the Present Studies Simulation have been carried out in order to assess the likely

success rate for proposed Irrigation scheme. The principle components of the model are:

a) Representation of the source of water (rainfall, river flows, ground water etc.) in both

quantity and time as modified by any storage facilities and as governed by the rules of

the operational plan.

b) Representation of the demand for irrigation from the various sub commands, and/or

other factors that are to be given consideration in the decision on how much water is

to be left into the canal system and how it is to be distributed.

Page 91: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8-3Haryana –122015

c) Representation of the canal system in adequate detail to make possible to study the

requirements of alternate operation plans which distinguish between various sub

commands in the decision for delivery of water.

d) The mathematical formulation of the concept used for reservoir simulation are

enumerated below:

8.3 CHOICE OF DECISION PERIOD

An important element in the design of the simulation model is the choice of decision

period. The various factors that should be given considerations are:

a) The cropping pattern particularly if staggering of sowing data of crops is an

important element.

b) The irrigation delivery policies

c) Rules for allocation of water

1 Conservation

of masstttttt REVPPQFSTST 1 Where STt, QFt, PPt and Evt are

the storage, inflow, and

precipitation, Evaporation

during period t.

2 Minimum and

maximumttt STSTST .max.min Generally, tST .min and ,.max tST

vary with t

3 Release for

various

purposes

tirrtwstint RRRR ... Where tintws RR .,. and tirrR . are

respectively releases for irrigation,

water supply, in stream flow

requirement during period t.

4 Water

requirementtreqt WR . treqW . = Minimum Required water

in period t

5 Minimum and

maximum

releases

ttt RRR .max.min tR .min and tR .max may vary with t

6 Reservoir

Spill

0Spill Minimum value of Spill must be

zero

Page 92: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8-4Haryana –122015

Simulation have been carried out on monthly basis for Sana Nadi Dam over Sana Nadi

whereas on 10 daily basisforPanidangar Barrageover Vansadhara River.

8.4 RULES OF OPERATION

The criteria of CWC are to meet the irrigation demands of each project at a success rate

of 75%. Now-a-days, the policy of GOI is to ensure at least one (preferably Kharif) crop

in the event of failures. In case of Rabi the extent of water available in the reservoir is

known in advance, therefore, planning can be done in advance to grow water resistant

crop varieties. Farmers cooperative can play a leading role in enlightment to grow these

varieties or depend on other alternatives like groundwater pumping or accept lower yield.

Therefore, the CWC criteria of meeting the success should be viewed from saving the

crops individually in both Kharif and Rabi for each project rather than on annual basis.

The criteria of CWC also require that to meet the success, there should be absolutely no

deficit. Experience has shown that with marginal reduction in supplies, there is not much

reduction in yields. Thus a reduction in supplies from 5 to 10% should not be treated as

failure.

Filling schedule for the reservoirs is introduced during Kharif so that the reservoir is

filled by end of September. It is proposed to fill the reservoir up to 35% of live capacity

by July and 70% of live capacity by August end and up to 95-100% by September end

depending upon the monsoon condition prevailing in that year. Failure in October can be

safely guarded from Non-monsoon flows. Filling will be done after meeting the current

period requirements. This procedure automatically ensures Kharif priority over Rabi.

8.5 THE INPUT AND OUTPUT

The Summary of Results of monthly simulation for the 40 year (Namely 1971-72 to

2010-2011) for dam Sana River and Barrage over Vansadhara River is given in

Annexure-8.1 and 8.2.

Page 93: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon 8-5Haryana –122015

8.6 CONCLUSIONS

It can be seen from the respective deficit in Supply for Irrigation, that the Irrigation

System requirement can be fulfilledto large extent by Barrage on Vansadhara river and

Dam on Sana Nadi, with slight deficit in June, which can be avoided if sufficient

carryover storage is kept in reservoir or conjunctive use of Groundwater is made at the

beginning of June.As far as Sana Nadi Dam is concerned it is able to meet the demand of

its command with 75% success if FRL is kept at 133 m for regulation purposes. It may be

noted that although the FRL for other purposes have been kept as 132 m but there is

sufficient freeboard, which have been kept so as to regulate the reservoir taking FRL as

133 m in bad and normal monsoon year. In case of good monsoon year FRL may be

treated as 132m without sacrificing any irrigation demand. However,Panidangar Barrage

on Vansdhara River will be able to meet the requirement only with the support of ground

water especially during June month for 75% success. But in future, once the dam

upstream above Barrage is constructed then it will be able to fulfill the demand of its

entire command of about 9000 ha with help of storage in upstream dam. It may be noted

that the Kharif crop requirement can be easily successfully met with the proposed

configuration of the project. In order to successfully meet the requirement of Rabi Crops,

it would be necessary either to make conjunctive use of ground water or Sana Nadi Dam

and Vamsadhra Barrage is regulated in such a way so as to store 20 MCM and 10 MCM

respectively at the beginning of June.From the Simulation studies it can be seen that

inrespect of Sana Nadi dam the Average Annual Evaporation, Irrigation and M& I are

11.58 MCM, 186.49 MCM and 6 MCMrespectively. However, in the case of

Panidangar barrage the average Annual Evaporation and Irrigation are 2.94 MCM and

99.59 MCM respectively.

Page 94: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

CHAPTER -9

IRRIGATION PLANNING

9.1 Soil Survey:

Soil survey is prerequisite to provide comprehensive information about soil characteristics

of the command area of the project. Main objective of Soil Survey is to define soil type of

Command Area and to classify soils for their suitability for irrigation and crop production.

In general soil information collected through survey is used for the following purposes.

1. To select soils for irrigated agriculture

2. To determine irrigation needs of specific soil type

3. To determine drainage needs of specific soil type

4. To determine fertility status of specific soil type

5. To identify problem soils and their reclamation needs

6. To determine land scaping & leveling needs

7. To determine suitability of soil for different crops

8. To determine irrigability of command area lands

It is strongly recommended that systematic soil studies should be conducted as per Food

and Agriculture Organization (FAO) guidelines before planning an irrigation project.

Periodic and variable supply of irrigation water results in changes in physical, chemical,

Texural and fertility levels of soil profile in command area.

9.2 Soil Classification:

Sustainable irrigated agriculture requires continuous studies of soil parameters like soil

fertility, soil suitability for various crops, irrigation and drainage scheduling and nutrient

availability for crop plants. The physical properties of soil like texture and structure help

in planning tillage requirements. Hydraulic properties like field capacity, water holding

capacity, wilting point, infiltration and percolation and hydraulic conductivity are

extremely important for scheduling irrigation and drainage for different crops under

IX-1

Page 95: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

varying agro climatic conditions. Chemical properties such as available nitrogen,

phosphorus and potassium level alongwith micronutrient availability determine soil

fertility status of the command area and on the basis of these parameters fertilizer

requirement for different soils and crops is determined. Other soil properties like pH,

Electrical conductivity (EC), cation and anion exchange capacity, determine salinity,

alkalinity and water logging problems of the soils of command area.

In order to classify soils of lower Vansdhara Irrigation Project secondary data pertaining

to soil characteristics and soil maps with self explanatory legend where collected.

9.3 Soils of Command Area: 9.3.1 Soil Texture and Particle size:

Lower Vansdhara Irrigation Project Command Area covers parts of Bishmakatak,

Rayagada and Kalyansingpur Tehsils of Rayagada district in Orissa state. Command Area

of the project has predominantly 3 types of soils namely clay loam, sandy loam and fine

textured sandy loam.

Bishamakatak Tehsil of Rayagada district is having clay loam soils in about half the area

on western side adjacent to Kalyansingpur Tehsil. Eastern part of Bishamakatak Tehsil is

characterized by sandy loam soils which are coarse in texture (Plate 9.1).

Kalyansingpur Tehsil of Rayagada district has clay loam soils except some western parts

where soils are sandy loam. Rayagada Tehsil is also having sandy soils with coarse texture

in about 80% of the area while remaining 20% area lying in the central part of the Tehsil

has sandy loam soil with fine texture (Plate 9.3).

9.3.2 Soil Depth:

As regards depth of the soils lying in the Command Area, it is observed that clay loam

and fine loam soils prevalent in Bishamakatak and Kalyansingpur Tehsil are shallow

ranging from 25-50 cm deep. The sandy loam soils in Bishamakatak and Rayagada

Tehsils are 50-100 cm deep while fine textured sandy loam soils in Rayagada Tehsil in

central part are deeper than 100 cm. It is observed that area in the vicinity of Vansdhara

IX-2

Page 96: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

river are deep and fine textured while soils in far away areas are shallow and coarse in

nature (Plate 9.2).

9.3.3 Soil Taxonomy:

The suitability of land differs from crop to crop and also with farming system. For

instance the requirement of major inputs like land and water are different for arable

crops like wheat, maize, sorghum, pulses and oilseed from rice crop. Rice crop can be

grown in heavy soils like clay and clay loam where soils are deep and have higher water

holding capacity. This type of soils are more prevalent in the vicinity of river while

crops requiring less water can be successfully grown on soils with light texture and

shallow depth away from the river.

The soils of Command Area can thus be classified as groups of vertisol. Being deep and

fine textured these soils have high water holding capacity and are suitable for rice

cultivation. Another class of soil represents moderately deep and well drained

(Association of Entisols, Inseptisols and Alfisols) and deep to very deep red loamy soils

(Alfisols).

The Lower Vansadhara project envisages construction of a 3200 m long earthen dam

with a chute spillway of 280.0 m length across river Vansadhara. The project command

area lies on both sides of River Vansadhara. Accordingly, two contour canals – Right

Main Canal (RMC) and Left Main canal (LMC) are proposed to off-take from the earthen

dam so as to serve the command area lying on the right side and left side of the river

respectively. Major cross drainage works and other structures proposed to be designed for

both canals have been identified and designed.

9.4 CROP WATER REQUIREMENT

Crop water requirement is defined as the depth of water needed to meet the water loss

through evapotransipiration of crops growing in large fields under non-restricting soil

conditions under the given growing environment. In the present study, for calculation of

crop water requirements and irrigation requirements, methodology presented in FAO

IX-3

Page 97: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

Irrigation and Drainage papers No. 24 “Crop Water Requirements” and No. 33 “Yield

response to water” has been used. The software “CROPWAT 5.7” based on revised

method for estimating reference crop evapotransipiration, adopting the approach of

Penman-Monteith as recommended by the FAO has been used for calculation of ETo and

crop water requirements for the selected crops.

Efficient use of water in crop production can only be attained when the system is geared

towards meeting the water requirement at the right time, during the periods of water

shortage. Water deficits, and the resulting water stress on the plant, have an effect on crop

evapotransipiration and crop yield. When the full crop water requirements are not met,

water deficit in the plant can develop to a point where crops growth and yield are

affected.

The main components determining crop water requirement are as follows:

i) Climate or the ambient environment enveloping the plants, which acts as the sink

for water and determines the evaporative demand. For instance, in a sunny and

hot climate crops need more water per day than in a cloudy and cool climate.

ii) Crop genotype, for example, banana and sugarcane crops having large leaf area

need more water than crops having smaller leaf area as beans and wheat, and

iii) Crop growth stages, for example, the crops fully grown need more water than

crops that have just been planted.

9.5 Step-by-Step Procedure for Computing Crop Water Requirement

There are several methods for computing crop water requirements such as direct

measurement through lysimeteric technique, and using climatological & physiological

approaches. The most practical and comprehensive method for computing CWR is

Penman - Monteith approach which is used to compute crop water requirements for this

project. The step-by-step procedure for computing crop water requirement is summarized

below:

i) Collection of Climatological Data

IX-4

Page 98: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

Crop water requirement is basically influenced by surface climatological data including

temperature, sunshine duration, wind velocity, relative humidity and rainfall. It may be

worthwhile to mention here that variation of climatological parameters such as sunshine

hour, relative humidity, maximum and minimum temperature over the area is much less

than variation rainfall. Keeping this fact in mind as well as availability of data, for the

present study the climatological data of Bhawanipatna observatory, which is situated near

the command, has been taken as representative of the entire area.

However, for rainfall the data of various stations falling within the project command

were considered for finding out the 75% dependable rainfall.

The rainfall data collected for these stations were analysed and the catchment rainfall has

been obtained by Theisson – Polygon Method. 75% dependable rainfall was computed

using standard statistical procedure. It is to be noted that the rainfall significantly

influences the irrigation requirements.

ii) Computation of Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo)

The crop water requirement (ETc) is calculated using following relation

ETC = ETO x KC

Where,

ETC = Crop evapotranspiration, mm/day.

Actually ETC is defined as crop water requirement or consumptive use of crop which is

defined as the depth of water needed to meet the water loss through evapotransipiration

(ET crop) of a disease-free crop, growing in large fields under non-restricting soil

conditions including soil water, fertility and achieving full production potential under the

given growing environment.

ETo = Reference crop evapotransipiration in mm/day.

ETO represents the rate of evapotransipiration from an extended surface of 8 to 15 cm,

green grass cover, actively growing, completely shading the ground and not short of

water.

IX-5

Page 99: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

KC = Crop co-efficient which varies with the crop genotype and growth stages. More

explicitly it is the function of crop canopy coverage. The KC of crop at younger age is

lower than that at full maturity stage.

iii) Selection of KC Values

The crop coefficient is the ratio of ETC/ETO. Whereas ETC is the crop evapotransipiration

of a crop and ETO is the reference evapotransipiration of grass crop.

KC is defined as the canopy coverage factor, which is influenced by following factors:

(i) Type of crop

(ii) Growth stage of the crop

(iii) Climate, and

(iv) Surface moisture condition of the field

With respect to type of crop the KC values of fully developed with large leaf area of a

crop like banana are higher than the KC values of fully developed with its small leaf area

such as gram crop. In fact the KC values are directly related to extent of transpiration. KC

value also differs with growth stage of a crop. For instance the KC values of initial

growth stage are much smaller than that of a full grown crop. The climate influences the

duration of the total growing period and various growth stages. For example, in a cool

climate, certain crop will grow slower than in warm climate.

The crop factor KC is determined from following parameters:

1. Crop genotype i.e. type of crop as cereal, vegetables, pulses, fiber crop etc.

2. The total growing period of each crop

3. Crop growth stages

IX-6

Page 100: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

The total growing period of a crop has been divided into four growth stages:

1. The initial growth stage: this is the period from sowing or transplanting when the

crop covers about 10% of the ground.

2. The crop development stage: this period starts at the end of the initial growth stage

and lasts until the full ground cover has been reached (ground cover about 70-80%).

3. The mid-season stage: this period starts at the end of the crop development stage

and lasts until maturity; it includes flowering and grain-setting.

4. The late season stage: this period starts at the end of the mid season stage and lasts

until the last day of the harvest; it includes ripening.

In the present study the crop coefficient values for the crops under consideration as

recommended by FAO have been used and KC values interpolated for 10 daily intervals

are given in the tables containing crop evapotransipiration and irrigation requirements

data.

iv) Determining Effective Rainfall

The entire water received from rainfall is not utilized by the growing crop, a part of it

may be lost by surface runoff, deep percolation or evaporation. Only a portion of heavy

and high intensive rains can enter and be stored in the root zone. A part of stored water is

utilized by crop to meet its evapotransipiration. In the present study, in the present

“effective rainfall” has been computed using USBR method. The monthly effective

rainfall is given at Annexure-9.1.

v) Irrigation Efficiencies

For the purpose of cropping pattern and crop water requirement the following efficiencies

are taken into consideration

IX-7

Page 101: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

System Efficiency

Items Surface Irrigation

Ponded Non Ponded

1. Conveyance Efficiency (from canal

head to outlet head)

90% 90%

2. Field channel efficiency (from

outlet head to field gate)

70% 70%

3. Field application efficiency 85% 65%

Overall Efficiency 53% 45%

vi) Computation of Crop Water Requirements and Net Irrigation Requirements

Crop water requirement (CWR) in practice are governed not only by the agro-climatic

conditions (temperature, humidity, wind velocity and bright sunshine hours) and crop

physiology i.e. crop coefficients (KC values) but also effective rooting depth and soil

moisture condition i.e. water depletion level affecting the growth period. For design

purposes, CWR is based on the assumption that no restrictive conditions arising out of

soil on water stress would apply. The ETC was accordingly computed using KC factor

values for particular crops and the ETO values as computed by Penman – Monteith

method.

For computing net irrigation requirement (NIR) effective rainfall using as calculated by

USBR method is accounted for and monthly net irrigation requirement for various crops

has been worked out. Crop-wise details for LBC of Sana Nadi Dam and RBC of Pani

Donger Barrage including Guddari Distributary are given in Annexure-I and Annexure-

II respectively.

The summary gross requirement at plant root and canal head for Right Bank Canal and

Left Bank Canal are given in Table 9.1(A) and 9.1(B) respectively. The detailed ten daily

net irrigation requirements in mm for all the crops are summarized in Table 9.2 (A) &

(B). The gross irrigation requirements were determined for project development using

assumed water use efficiencies. The 10 daily and monthly gross irrigation water

IX-8

Page 102: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

requirements for various crops for Right Bank Canal are given in Table 9.3(A) and

9.4(A).

9.6 COMMAND AREA

The project command area lies on Right bank of River Vansdhara where Panidonger

Barrage is proposed serving Culturable Command Area of 8105 ha. Further, a small

distributaries also takes from the left bank from the barrage having Culturable Command

area of 1099 ha.

There is a dam proposed on Sana Nadi, a tributary of Vansdhara from where the left main

canal takes off. The Culturable command area (CCA) of LMC is 12,946 ha. The brief

details of command area are as follows :

S.No. Items Gross Command

Area (ha)

Culturable Command

Area (ha)

1 Pani Donger Barrage-Right

Main Canal

11578 8105

2 Pani Donger Barrage – Left

Bank Guddari Distributory

1571 1099

3 Sana Nadi Dam LBC 18492 12946

Total 31641 22150

9.7 Irrigation Requirement of Crops

The overall summary of irrigation requirement at canal head is given Table 9.6 below.

The Overall demand for LBC of Sana Nadi Dam and RBC of Pani Donger Barrage

including Guddari distributary are 200.2 MCM and 114.9 MCM respectively, Hence the

overall crop water demand is 315.1 MCM.

IX-9

Page 103: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited 76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon Haryana –122015

Table 9.6: Table Crop Water Requirement in Proposed Conditions

Sr No

Season Crop Net Sown Area (Ha) Total % of Net Sown Area

Total Water Requirement at Canal Head (MCM)

Right Bank Canal of Pani Donger Barrage including Guddari Distributary

Left Bank Canal of Sana Nadi dam

RBC LBC Total

1 Kharif E.Paddy 2051 3237 25 20.0 32.4 52.2

2 M.Paddy 2871 4531 35 30.5 43.8 74.3

3 L.Paddy 820 1295 10 7.7 12.3 20.0

4 Maize 410 647 5 0.6 0.9 1.5

5 Ragi 410 647 5 0.6 1.2 1.8

6 Vegetables 246 388 3 0.5 0.9 1.4

7 Fodder 164 259 2 0.3 0.6 0.9

Sub Total 6974 11004 85 60.2 92.2 152.4

8 Rabi D.Paddy 1641 2589 20 17.7 40.5 56.3

9 Wheat 2461 3884 30 17.8 31.1 46.9

10 Pulses 656 1036 8 3.6 8.8 12.0

11 Vegetables 246 388 3 1.7 3.6 5.1

12 Mustard 246 388 3 1.2 2.9 4.0

13 Groundnut 246 388 3 1.0 3.1 4.0

14 Potato 246 388 3 1.5 3.6 4.9

15 Fodder 82 129 1 0.6 0.7 1.3

Sub Total 5824.9 9191.7 71 45.0 94.2 134.3

16 Peren

nial Sugarcane

410 647 5 9.7 13.7 22.4

Sub Total 410 647 5 9.7 13.7 22.4

Grand Total 13209 20843 161 114.9 200.2 315.1

IX-10

Page 104: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Reference Evapotranspiration ETo according Penman-Monteith │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Country : india Meteo Station : goplapur ( yr) │ │ Altitude : 17 meter Coordinates : 19.26 N.L. 84.88 E.L │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month MaxTemp MinTemp Humid. Wind Sunshine Sol.Radia ETo-PenMon │ │ °C °C % km/day hours MJ/m²/day mm/day │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ January 27.3 16.5 73 235 9.2 18.1 3.9 │ │ February 29.2 19.3 76 293 9.2 20.1 4.5 │ │ March 30.6 22.3 80 398 9.4 22.6 5.2 │ │ April 31.1 24.7 85 504 8.8 22.9 5.1 │ │ May 32.3 26.4 84 521 8.5 22.7 5.4 │ │ June 32.3 26.6 84 425 6.9 20.1 5.0 │ │ July 31.0 25.7 86 382 7.1 20.4 4.7 │ │ August 31.3 25.7 85 314 6.9 19.9 4.6 │ │ September 31.8 25.4 83 274 8.5 21.5 4.9 │ │ October 31.3 23.6 80 240 9.2 20.7 4.7 │ │ November 29.7 19.4 72 231 9.7 19.2 4.5 │ │ December 27.8 16.4 70 238 8.6 16.8 4.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ YEAR 30.5 22.7 79 338 8.5 20.4 1718 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Climate file : Climate Station : goplapur │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ ET0 Rainfall Eff. Rain │ │ (mm/day) (mm/month) (mm/month) │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ January 3.9 9.1 8.9 │ │ February 4.5 23.3 22.4 │ │ March 5.2 12.8 12.6 │ │ April 5.1 15.1 14.8 │ │ May 5.4 41.3 38.6 │ │ June 5.0 110.1 90.7 │ │ July 4.7 141.0 109.2 │ │ August 4.6 154.1 116.1 │ │ September 4.9 161.4 119.7 │ │ October 4.7 180.5 128.4 │ │ November 4.5 83.5 72.3 │ │ December 4.0 11.3 11.1 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ YEAR Total 1718.5 943.6 744.8 mm │ │ │ │ Effective Rainfall with USBR method │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-19

Page 105: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Total Service area (Net CCA) ,ha= 9204 Net CCA (Surface Irrigation), ha = 9204 Kharif 53% 45% Net CCA ( Drip Irrigation ) , ha = 0 Rabi 53% 45%

S.No. Crop NameCrop Code

Planting Period Optimum

Planting Date

Crop Duration (in Days)

Total Requirement At

Plant Root (mm)

Croppong Intensity (in

%)

Area Under Crop (ha)

Total Requirement

at Plant Root(MCM)

Total Requirement At

Canal Head (MCM) for Surface Irrigation

Total Requirement at

Canal Head ( including

surface & Drip scheme) in TMC

1 E.Paddy X1 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 460.0 25.0 2301 10.6 20.0 0.72 M.Paddy X2 June 15-15 Oct 15th June 120 days 501.0 35.0 3221 16.1 30.5 1.13 L.Paddy X3 June 20-15 Sept 20th June 100 days 444.0 10.0 920 4.1 7.7 0.34 Maize X4 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 60.0 5.0 460 0.3 0.6 0.05 Ragi X5 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 60.7 5.0 460 0.3 0.6 0.06 Vegetables X6 June 15-15 Oct 15th June 120 days 88.4 3.0 276 0.2 0.5 0.07 Fodder X7 June 15-25 Oct 15th June 130 days 81.9 2.0 184 0.2 0.3 0.0

Sub Total 85.0 7824 31.8 60.2 2.1

8 D.Paddy X8 Nov 15-31 Jan 15th Nov. 75 days 509.0 20.0 1841 9.4 17.7 0.69 Wheat X9 Nov 15-3 March 15th Nov. 110 days 289.3 30.0 2761 8.0 17.8 0.6

10 Pulses X10 Dec 1-28 Feb 1st Dec. 90 days 218.9 8.0 736 1.6 3.6 0.111 Vegetables X11 Nov 1-15 Feb 1st Nov. 105 days 274.6 3.0 276 0.8 1.7 0.112 Sunflower X12 Oct 15-4 Feb 15th Oct 110 days 195.1 3.0 276 0.5 1.2 0.013 Groundnut X13 Nov 15-31 Jan 15th Nov. 75 days 162.1 3.0 276 0.4 1.0 0.014 Potato X14 Nov 1-15 Feb 1st Nov. 105 days 238.0 3.0 276 0.7 1.5 0.115 Fodder X23 Oct. 1-15 7th Oct. 110 days 240.5 1.0 92 0.22 0.5 0.0

Sub Total 71.0 6534.9 21.6 44.8 1.6

16 Sugarcane X30 July 1-31 15th July 365 days 820.5 5.0 460 3.8 8.4 0.3Sub Total 5.0 460 3.8 8.4 0.3

161.0 14819 57.1 113.5 4.01* Crop Water Requirement

Surface Irrigation :System Efficiency ( %)

Table-9.1 (A)Crop Water Requirement

ForRBC Command Area Pani Donger Barrage and Guddari Distributary

Non PondedPonded

GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL CWR*

KHARIF

PERENNIAL

RABI

Page 106: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

S.No Crop Code Planting Crop

Date Duration T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3

Kharif1 E.Paddy X1 15th June 105 days 120.6 121.4 43.8 36.4 28.6 26.6 25.3 24.2 18.4 6.4 8.3

2 M.Paddy X2 15th June 120 days 152.3 98.0 43.8 36.5 28.8 26.8 25.3 24.2 26.4 21.1 11.9 6.0

3 L.Paddy X3 20th June 100 days 209.5 43.8 36.8 29.5 27.5 25.5 24.2 26.4 17.9 2.9

4 Maize X4 15th June 105 days 60.0

5 Ragi X5 15th June 105 days 60.0 0.7

6 Vegetables X6 15th June 120 days 0.4 60.0 2.0 7.4 11.3 7.3

7 Fodder X7 15th June 130 days 60.0 2.9 6.2 8.6 4.2

Rabi8 D.Paddy X8 15th Nov. 75 days 55.7 127.8 59.6 59.1 58.5 58.6 53.0 36.7

9 Wheat X9 15th Nov. 110 days 4.6 10.4 11.6 17.8 27.9 33.3 33.8 36.5 37.4 34.3 29.9 11.8

10 Pulses X10 1st Dec. 90 days 10.1 11.5 15.4 23.6 30.2 34.9 35.4 31.7 26.1

11 Vegetables X11 1st Nov. 105 days 14.0 17.7 20.0 23.6 26.9 29.3 30.4 30.8 32.6 33.1 16.2

12 Sunflower X12 15th Oct 110 days 1.5 9.2 16.8 23.6 26.9 27.2 27.5 26.6 25.0 10.8

13 Groundnut X13 15th Nov. 75 days 5.5 12.0 19.9 26.9 27.2 27.3 24.4 18.9

14 Potato X14 1st Nov. 105 days 6.9 10.9 14.2 21.4 27.7 30.0 30.4 29.8 28.9 26.3 11.5

15 Fodder X15 7th Oct. 110 days 9.7 22.5 26.3 29.8 28.9 27.9 26.9 27.2 27.4 13.9

Perennial16 Sugarcane X16 15th July 365 days 20.0 3.1 0.7 9.2 17.4 20.6 24.6 28.1 27.3 26.4 25.5 25.7 26.1 26.2 27.8 29.4 31.0 35.5 40.0 44.4 45.2 46.0 46.7 47.8 52.1 54.8 38.9

Table- 9.2 (A)

Crop CalendarLower Vansadhara Right Bank Canal

MayNov Dec Jan FebJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Mar Apr

Page 107: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Unit: MCM

S.No Crop Code

T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3

Kharif

1 E.Paddy X1 0.00 2.78 2.79 1.01 0.84 0.66 0.61 0.58 0.56 0.42 0.15 0.19 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6

2 M.Paddy X2 0.00 4.91 3.16 1.41 1.18 0.93 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.85 0.68 0.38 0.19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1

3 L.Paddy X3 0.00 1.93 0.40 0.34 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.24 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1

4 Maize X4 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

5 Ragi X5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

6 Vegetables X6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2

7 Fodder X7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2

Rabi

8 D.Paddy X8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.37

9 Wheat X9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.99

10 Pulses X10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.61

11 Vegetables X11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.76

12 Sunflower X12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.54

13 Groundnut X13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.45

14 Potato X14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.66

15 Fodder X15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22

Perennial

16 Sugarcane X16 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 3.8

0.09 9.90 6.35 2.76 2.28 1.84 1.71 1.62 1.86 1.61 0.97 0.60 0.28 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.4 3.0 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.4 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 57.1

0.20 18.78 11.99 5.20 4.31 3.47 3.23 3.06 3.59 3.09 1.87 1.15 0.55 0.28 0.27 0.44 2.83 5.80 3.82 4.31 5.01 5.50 5.39 5.02 3.61 3.11 2.62 1.13 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.53 0.56 0.40 113.5

0.01 0.66 0.42 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.01

Table-9.3 (A)

Mar Apr

Ten Daily Crop Water Requirement

Jan Feb

RBC Command Area Pani Donger Barrage and Guddari Distributary

For

Annual Total

Total Requirement at Canal Head (MCM)

Total CWR at plant Root (MCM)

Total Requirement at Canal Head (TMC)

Jun Jul Aug Sep MayNov DecOct

Page 108: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Total Service area (Net CCA) ,ha= 12946 Net CCA (Surface Irrigation), ha = 12946 Kharif 53% 45% Net CCA ( Drip Irrigation ) , ha = 0 Rabi 53% 45%

S.No. Crop NameCrop Code

Planting Period Optimum

Planting Date

Crop Duration (in Days)

Total Requirement At

Plant Root (mm)

Croppong Intensity (in

%)

Area Under Crop (ha)

Total Requirement

at Plant Root(MCM)

Total Requirement At

Canal Head (MCM) for Surface Irrigation

Total Requirement at

Canal Head in TMC

1 E.Paddy X1 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 531.0 25.0 3237 17.2 32.4 1.152 M.Paddy X2 June 15-15 Oct 15th June 120 days 512.0 35.0 4531 23.2 43.8 1.553 L.Paddy X3 June 20-15 Sept 20th June 100 days 505.0 10.0 1295 6.5 12.3 0.444 Maize X4 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 60.0 5.0 647 0.4 0.9 0.035 Ragi X5 June 15-30 Sept 15th June 105 days 78.5 5.0 647 0.5 1.1 0.046 Vegetables X6 June 15-15 Oct 15th June 120 days 95.3 3.0 388 0.4 0.8 0.037 Fodder X7 June 15-25 Oct 15th June 130 days 95.5 2.0 259 0.2 0.5 0.02

Sub Total 85.0 11004 48.4 91.9 3.25

8 D.Paddy X8 Nov 15-31 Jan 15th Nov. 75 days 829.0 20.0 2589 21.5 40.5 1.439 Wheat X9 Nov 15-3 March 15th Nov. 110 days 327.9 30.0 3884 12.7 28.3 1.00

10 Pulses X10 Dec 1-28 Feb 1st Dec. 90 days 348.4 8.0 1036 3.6 8.0 0.2811 Vegetables X11 Nov 1-15 Feb 1st Nov. 105 days 376.5 3.0 388 1.5 3.2 0.1112 Sunflower X12 Oct 15-4 Feb 15th Oct 110 days 302.6 3.0 388 1.2 2.6 0.0913 Groundnut X13 Nov 15-31 Jan 15th Nov. 75 days 327.9 3.0 388 1.3 2.8 0.1014 Potato X14 Nov 1-15 Feb 1st Nov. 105 days 375.2 3.0 388 1.5 3.2 0.1115 Fodder X23 Oct. 1-15 7th Oct. 110 days 231.6 1.0 129 0.3 0.7 0.0

Sub Total 71.0 9191.7 43.5 89.4 3.16

16 Sugarcane X30 July 1-31 15th July 365 days 870.4 5.0 647 5.6 12.5 0.4Sub Total 5.0 647 5.6 12.5 0.4

161.0 20843 97.5 193.8 6.85* Crop Water Requirement

Surface Irrigation :System Efficiency ( %)

Table-9.1 (B)Crop Water Requirement

ForLBC Command Area

Non PondedPonded

GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL CWR*

KHARIF

PERENNIAL

RABI

Page 109: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

S.No Crop Code Planting Crop

Date Duration T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3

Kharif1 E.Paddy X1 15th June 105 days 108.0 75.0 35.7 32.8 29.5 27.6 26.0 24.7 25.3 26.0 24.4 16.5 5.5 8.6 6.1 59.3

2 M.Paddy X2 15th June 120 days 87.7 110.2 43.1 33.0 29.9 28.1 26.2 24.7 25.3 26.0 26.4 20.8 10.4 3.2 17.0

3 L.Paddy X3 20th June 100 days 23.2 94.7 109.6 33.0 30.3 28.9 27.0 25.2 25.4 26.1 26.7 24.9 17.4 7.3 5.3

4 Maize X4 15th June 105 days 8.3 13.4 14.1 12.4 9.2 2.5 0.1

5 Ragi X5 15th June 105 days 10.00 15.8 16.6 14.7 11.6 6.2 3.6

6 Vegetables X6 15th June 120 days 3.0 3.6 2.3 3.0 6.0 9.0 11.0 12.8 13.4 14.1 11.4 5.7

7 Fodder X7 15th June 130 days 9.20 15.80 13.20 10.60 9.60 8.50 7.40 8.00 8.6 4.6

Rabi8 D.Paddy X8 15th Nov. 75 days 5.4 54.8 100.9 76.4 45.0 51.3 56.6 55.1 53.2 53.0 53.7 54.4 52.9 50.2 45.3 20.8

9 Wheat X9 15th Nov. 110 days 4.2 16.4 32.3 40.8 43.9 43.8 44.8 41.5 33.3 26.9

10 Pulses X10 1st Dec. 90 days 9.5 16.2 18.0 23.6 32.8 40.4 43.7 44.6 45.7 41.1 32.8

11 Vegetables X11 1st Nov. 105 days 3.0 9.3 16.8 27.3 36.9 39.8 40.0 39.9 40.7 41.5 40.7 40.6

12 Sunflower X12 15th Oct 110 days 11.2 25.5 38.7 41.5 40.0 39.9 40.7 35.5 23.3 6.3

13 Groundnut X13 15th Nov. 75 days 0.2 6.3 13.6 22.8 27.4 31.0 34.8 36.6 37.2 37.8 36.9 31.1 12.2

14 Potato X14 1st Nov. 105 days 0.4 8.3 21.3 34.9 39.6 40.0 39.9 40.7 41.5 39.3 36.4 32.9

15 Fodder X15 7th Oct. 110 days 1.1 8.2 14.3 20.4 25.7 32.3 38.2 37.3 36.1 18.0

Perennial16 Sugarcane X16 15th July 365 days 23.9 16.0 13.4 16.2 8.3 7.2 6.1 5.1 5.6 6.2 6.7 5.1 2.1 5.9 12.0 18.2 23.5 30.2 36.2 35.5 34.1 34.1 34.6 35.1 35.6 38.8 42.1 45.3 44.7 44.2 43.6 42.0 41.0 39.7 32.1

Table-9.2 (B)

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Mar Apr

Crop CalendarLower Vansadhara Left Bank Canal

MayNov Dec Jan Feb

Page 110: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Unit: MCM

S.No Crop Code

T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3

Kharif

1 E.Paddy X1 3.50 2.43 1.16 1.06 0.95 0.89 0.84 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.79 0.53 0.18 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.9 17.2

2 M.Paddy X2 3.97 4.99 1.95 1.50 1.35 1.27 1.19 1.12 1.15 1.18 1.20 0.94 0.47 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 23.2

3 L.Paddy X3 0.30 1.23 1.42 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.32 0.23 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5

4 Maize X4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

5 Ragi X5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5

6 Vegetables X6 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4

7 Fodder X7 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2

Rabi

8 D.Paddy X8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 1.4 2.6 2.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5

9 Wheat X9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.7

10 Pulses X10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6

11 Vegetables X11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5

12 Sunflower X12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2

13 Groundnut X13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3

14 Potato X14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5

15 Fodder X15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

Perennial

16 Sugarcane X16 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 5.6

7.92 8.79 4.67 3.13 2.79 2.64 2.47 2.34 2.52 2.66 2.64 2.05 1.04 0.6 1.7 2.7 2.2 1.7 2.6 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 3.9 3.5 2.1 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 2.9 97.56

15.00 16.62 8.86 5.96 5.30 5.00 4.70 4.45 4.83 5.12 5.09 3.96 2.03 1.10 3.24 5.17 4.14 3.34 5.42 7.71 8.53 8.83 9.00 9.29 9.09 8.22 7.42 4.32 2.53 0.64 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.59 0.94 5.54 193.8

0.53 0.59 0.31 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.07 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 6.85

Table-9.3 (B)

Mar Apr

Ten Daily Crop Water Requirement

Jan FebOct

LBC Command AreaFor

Annual Total

Total Requirement at Canal Head (MCM)

Total CWR at plant Root (MCM)

MayNov Dec

Total Requirement at Canal Head (TMC)

Jun Jul Aug Sep

Page 111: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-1: E. Paddy ============================================================================ Crop : PADDY Station : goplapur Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : Geffect Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 15 June │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ May 2 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.34 0.0 0.9 1.2 0.3 1.21 6.1 │ │ May 3 N/L 0.16 1.19 1.03 0.2 5.0 6.2 3.0 5.93 59.3 │ │ Jun 1 LP 0.55 1.15 3.24 0.8 8.1 12.2 13.6 10.80 108.0 │ │ Jun 2 L/A 0.89 1.11 4.91 1.3 4.1 10.3 27.7 7.52 75.2 │ │ Jun 3 A 1.00 1.10 5.37 1.5 0.0 6.9 33.0 3.57 35.7 │ │ Jul 1 A/B 1.00 1.10 5.25 1.5 0.0 6.7 34.7 3.28 32.8 │ │ Jul 2 B 1.00 1.08 5.09 1.5 0.0 6.6 36.4 2.95 29.5 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.07 4.98 1.5 0.0 6.5 37.2 2.76 27.6 │ │ Aug 1 B/C 1.00 1.05 4.89 1.5 0.0 6.4 37.9 2.60 26.0 │ │ Aug 2 C 1.00 1.05 4.84 1.5 0.0 6.3 38.7 2.47 24.7 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.95 1.5 0.0 6.4 39.1 2.53 25.3 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 5.05 1.5 0.0 6.6 39.5 2.60 26.0 │ │ Sep 2 C/D 1.00 1.03 5.05 1.4 0.0 6.4 39.9 2.44 24.4 │ │ Sep 3 D 1.00 0.97 4.68 1.1 0.0 5.7 40.9 1.65 16.5 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 0.88 4.21 0.7 0.0 4.9 43.2 0.55 5.5 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.80 3.75 0.2 0.0 4.0 22.4 1.72 8.6 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 656 176 180 1019 487 531 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-20

Page 112: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-2: M. Paddy ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : goplapur Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : Geffect Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 21 June │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ May 3 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.35 0.0 1.6 2.0 0.9 1.88 17.0 │ │ Jun 1 N/L 0.26 1.18 1.55 0.4 7.5 9.4 6.4 8.77 87.7 │ │ Jun 2 LP 0.73 1.13 4.10 1.1 8.1 13.3 22.8 11.02 110.2 │ │ Jun 3 L/A 0.98 1.10 5.26 1.5 0.8 7.5 32.2 4.31 43.1 │ │ Jul 1 A 1.00 1.10 5.27 1.5 0.0 6.8 34.7 3.30 33.0 │ │ Jul 2 A/B 1.00 1.09 5.13 1.5 0.0 6.6 36.4 2.99 29.9 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.08 5.03 1.5 0.0 6.5 37.2 2.81 28.1 │ │ Aug 1 B 1.00 1.06 4.92 1.5 0.0 6.4 37.9 2.62 26.2 │ │ Aug 2 B/C 1.00 1.05 4.84 1.5 0.0 6.3 38.7 2.47 24.7 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.95 1.5 0.0 6.4 39.1 2.53 25.3 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 5.05 1.5 0.0 6.6 39.5 2.60 26.0 │ │ Sep 2 C 1.00 1.05 5.16 1.5 0.0 6.7 39.9 2.66 26.6 │ │ Sep 3 C/D 1.00 1.01 4.90 1.3 0.0 6.2 40.9 2.08 20.8 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 0.93 4.45 0.9 0.0 5.4 43.2 1.04 10.4 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.85 3.99 0.5 0.0 4.5 44.8 0.00 0.0 │ │ Oct 3 D 1.00 0.77 3.53 0.0 0.0 3.5 3.8 3.17 3.2 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 652 176 180 1011 498 512 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-21

Page 113: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-3: L. Paddy ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : goplapur Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : Geffect Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 1 July │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 1 NUR 0.10 1.20 0.61 0.2 1.8 2.6 2.5 2.32 23.2 │ │ Jun 2 LP 0.33 1.18 1.90 0.5 8.1 10.5 10.1 9.47 94.7 │ │ Jun 3 LP 0.78 1.13 4.25 1.2 8.1 13.5 25.5 10.96 109.6 │ │ Jul 1 A 1.00 1.10 5.27 1.5 0.0 6.8 34.7 3.30 33.0 │ │ Jul 2 A 1.00 1.10 5.17 1.5 0.0 6.7 36.4 3.03 30.3 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.09 5.10 1.5 0.0 6.6 37.2 2.88 28.8 │ │ Aug 1 B 1.00 1.07 4.99 1.5 0.0 6.5 37.9 2.69 26.9 │ │ Aug 2 B 1.00 1.06 4.88 1.5 0.0 6.4 38.7 2.51 25.1 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.95 1.5 0.0 6.4 39.1 2.53 25.3 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 5.05 1.5 0.0 6.6 39.5 2.60 26.0 │ │ Sep 2 C 1.00 1.05 5.16 1.5 0.0 6.7 39.9 2.66 26.6 │ │ Sep 3 C 1.00 1.05 5.08 1.5 0.0 6.6 40.9 2.49 24.9 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 1.01 4.80 1.3 0.0 6.1 43.2 1.74 17.4 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.92 4.34 0.9 0.0 5.2 44.8 0.73 7.3 │ │ Oct 3 D 1.00 0.84 3.88 0.4 0.0 4.3 37.9 0.53 5.3 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 654 179 180 1013 508 505 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-22

Page 114: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-4: MAIZE CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : MAIZE Crop file : maize │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 40 30 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.45 -> 1.10 0.55 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.30 1.30 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.40 1.30 0.50 1.25 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : MAIZE Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.45 2.16 21.6 34.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.45 2.11 21.1 36.4 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 in/de 0.50 2.32 23.2 37.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 0.64 2.95 29.5 37.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 deve 0.82 3.79 37.9 38.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 deve 1.01 4.74 47.4 39.1 0.83 8.3 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.10 5.29 52.9 39.5 1.34 13.4 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.10 5.40 54.0 39.9 1.41 14.1 │ │ Sep 3 mid 1.10 5.32 53.2 40.9 1.23 12.3 │ │ Oct 1 mid 1.10 5.24 52.4 43.2 0.92 9.2 │ │ Oct 2 late 1.01 4.73 47.3 44.8 0.25 2.5 │ │ Oct 3 late 0.83 3.80 38.0 37.9 0.01 0.1 │ │ Nov 1 late 0.64 2.91 29.1 31.0 0.00 0.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 507.6 501.2 60.0 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-23

Page 115: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-5: BARLEY CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : Barley Crop file : barley │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 45 30 135 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.40 -> 1.15 0.40 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.10 1.10 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.90 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.20 0.60 0.50 0.40 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : Barley Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.40 1.92 19.2 34.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.40 1.88 18.8 36.4 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 in/de 0.45 2.12 21.2 37.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 0.61 2.85 28.5 37.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 deve 0.83 3.82 38.2 38.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 deve 1.04 4.91 49.1 39.1 1.00 10.0 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.15 5.53 55.3 39.5 1.58 15.8 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.15 5.65 56.5 39.9 1.66 16.6 │ │ Sep 3 mid 1.15 5.56 55.6 40.9 1.47 14.7 │ │ Oct 1 mid 1.15 5.48 54.8 43.2 1.16 11.6 │ │ Oct 2 mi/lt 1.09 5.10 51.0 44.8 0.62 6.2 │ │ Oct 3 late 0.90 4.15 41.5 37.9 0.36 3.6 │ │ Nov 1 late 0.65 2.94 29.4 31.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 2 late 0.40 1.78 8.9 12.1 0.00 0.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 528.0 513.2 78.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-24

Page 116: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-6: VEGETABLES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : VEGETABLES Crop file : vegg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 20 40 40 20 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.75 -> 1.10 0.95 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.25 -> 0.70 0.70 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.30 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : VEGETABLES Planting date : 15 June │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 2 init 0.75 3.73 18.6 15.6 0.60 3.0 │ │ Jun 3 init 0.75 3.66 36.6 33.0 0.36 3.6 │ │ Jul 1 in/de 0.77 3.70 37.0 34.7 0.23 2.3 │ │ Jul 2 deve 0.84 3.94 39.4 36.4 0.30 3.0 │ │ Jul 3 deve 0.93 4.32 43.2 37.2 0.60 6.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 1.01 4.70 47.0 37.9 0.90 9.0 │ │ Aug 2 de/mi 1.08 4.97 49.7 38.7 1.10 11.0 │ │ Aug 3 mid 1.10 5.18 51.8 39.1 1.27 12.7 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.10 5.29 52.9 39.5 1.34 13.4 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.10 5.40 54.0 39.9 1.41 14.1 │ │ Sep 3 mi/lt 1.08 5.23 52.3 40.9 1.14 11.4 │ │ Oct 1 late 1.03 4.88 48.8 43.2 0.57 5.7 │ │ Oct 2 late 0.95 4.46 22.3 22.4 0.00 0.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 553.6 458.4 95.3 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-25

Page 117: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-7: FODDER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : FODDER Crop file : fodder │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 15 30 30 15 90 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 1.00 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.40 -> 0.40 0.40 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : FODDER Planting date : 15 June │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 2 init 1.00 4.97 24.8 15.6 1.85 9.2 │ │ Jun 3 init 1.00 4.88 48.8 33.0 1.58 15.8 │ │ Jul 1 deve 1.00 4.79 47.9 34.7 1.32 13.2 │ │ Jul 2 deve 1.00 4.70 47.0 36.4 1.06 10.6 │ │ Jul 3 deve 1.00 4.67 46.7 37.2 0.95 9.5 │ │ Aug 1 mid 1.00 4.64 46.4 37.9 0.85 8.5 │ │ Aug 2 mid 1.00 4.61 46.1 38.7 0.74 7.4 │ │ Aug 3 mid 1.00 4.71 47.1 39.1 0.80 8.0 │ │ Sep 1 late 1.00 4.81 48.1 39.5 0.86 8.6 │ │ Sep 2 late 1.00 4.91 24.6 20.0 0.92 4.6 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 427.5 332.0 95.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-26

Page 118: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-8: D. PADDY ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : goplapur Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : Geffect Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 15 November │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.30 0.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.08 5.4 │ │ Oct 3 N/L 0.16 1.19 0.90 0.2 5.0 6.1 6.3 5.48 54.8 │ │ Nov 1 LP 0.55 1.15 2.87 0.8 8.1 11.8 17.1 10.08 100.8 │ │ Nov 2 L/A 0.89 1.11 4.39 1.3 4.1 9.8 21.4 7.63 76.3 │ │ Nov 3 A 1.00 1.10 4.73 1.5 0.0 6.2 17.3 4.50 45.0 │ │ Dec 1 A/B 1.00 1.10 4.54 1.5 0.0 6.0 9.2 5.12 51.2 │ │ Dec 2 B 1.00 1.08 4.32 1.5 0.0 5.8 1.7 5.65 56.5 │ │ Dec 3 B 1.00 1.07 4.22 1.5 0.0 5.7 2.1 5.51 55.1 │ │ Jan 1 B/C 1.00 1.05 4.14 1.5 0.0 5.6 3.2 5.32 53.2 │ │ Jan 2 C 1.00 1.05 4.09 1.5 0.0 5.6 3.0 5.30 53.0 │ │ Jan 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.32 1.5 0.0 5.8 4.5 5.37 53.7 │ │ Feb 1 C 1.00 1.05 4.54 1.5 0.0 6.0 6.0 5.44 54.4 │ │ Feb 2 C/D 1.00 1.03 4.66 1.4 0.0 6.0 7.5 5.29 52.9 │ │ Feb 3 D 1.00 0.97 4.60 1.1 0.0 5.7 6.4 5.02 50.2 │ │ Mar 1 D 1.00 0.88 4.40 0.7 0.0 5.1 5.3 4.53 45.3 │ │ Mar 2 D 1.00 0.80 4.17 0.2 0.0 4.4 2.1 4.16 20.8 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 590 176 180 943 114 829 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-27

Page 119: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-9: WHEAT CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : WHEAT Crop file : wheat │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 30 30 30 30 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.50 -> 1.20 0.60 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.70 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : WHEAT Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.50 2.26 22.6 31.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.50 2.23 22.3 24.1 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 3 init 0.50 2.15 21.5 17.3 0.42 4.2 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.62 2.56 25.6 9.2 1.64 16.4 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.85 3.39 33.9 1.7 3.22 32.2 │ │ Dec 3 deve 1.08 4.29 42.9 2.1 4.08 40.8 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.20 4.72 47.2 3.2 4.39 43.9 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.20 4.68 46.8 3.0 4.38 43.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.20 4.93 49.3 4.5 4.48 44.8 │ │ Feb 1 late 1.10 4.75 47.5 6.0 4.15 41.5 │ │ Feb 2 late 0.90 4.08 40.8 7.5 3.33 33.3 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.70 3.33 33.3 6.4 2.69 26.9 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 433.6 116.0 327.9 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-28

Page 120: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-10: PULSES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : pulses Crop file : pulsesg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 30 30 25 110 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.45 -> 1.15 0.60 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.60 0.80 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : pulses Planting date : 1 December │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Dec 1 init 0.45 1.86 18.6 9.2 0.95 9.5 │ │ Dec 2 init 0.45 1.80 18.0 1.7 1.62 16.2 │ │ Dec 3 in/de 0.51 2.01 20.1 2.1 1.80 18.0 │ │ Jan 1 deve 0.68 2.69 26.9 3.2 2.36 23.6 │ │ Jan 2 deve 0.92 3.57 35.8 3.0 3.28 32.8 │ │ Jan 3 de/mi 1.09 4.49 44.9 4.5 4.04 40.4 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.15 4.97 49.7 6.0 4.37 43.7 │ │ Feb 2 mid 1.15 5.21 52.1 7.5 4.46 44.6 │ │ Feb 3 mi/lt 1.10 5.21 52.1 6.4 4.57 45.7 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.93 4.63 46.3 5.3 4.11 41.1 │ │ Mar 2 late 0.71 3.70 37.0 4.2 3.28 32.8 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 401.4 53.0 348.4 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-29

Page 121: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-11: VEGETABLES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : VEGETABLES Crop file : vegg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 20 40 40 20 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.75 -> 1.10 0.95 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.25 -> 0.70 0.70 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.30 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : VEGETABLES Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.75 3.40 34.0 31.0 0.30 3.0 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.75 3.34 33.4 24.1 0.93 9.3 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.79 3.41 34.1 17.3 1.68 16.8 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.88 3.65 36.5 9.2 2.73 27.3 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.97 3.87 38.7 1.7 3.69 36.9 │ │ Dec 3 deve 1.06 4.18 41.8 2.1 3.97 39.7 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 4.32 43.2 3.2 4.00 40.0 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 4.29 42.9 3.0 3.99 39.9 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 4.52 45.2 4.5 4.07 40.7 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.10 4.75 47.5 6.0 4.15 41.5 │ │ Feb 2 late 1.06 4.81 48.1 7.5 4.07 40.7 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.99 4.70 47.0 6.4 4.06 40.6 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 492.4 116.0 376.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-30

Page 122: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-12: SUNFLOWER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : SUNFLOWER Crop file : oilsedg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 40 40 25 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.40 -> 1.10 0.40 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.30 1.30 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.45 -> 0.50 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.95 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : SUNFLOWER Planting date : 15 October │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 init 0.40 1.88 9.4 22.4 0.00 0.0 │ │ Oct 3 init 0.40 1.84 18.4 37.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 1 init 0.40 1.81 18.1 31.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 2 deve 0.49 2.17 21.7 24.1 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.66 2.85 28.5 17.3 1.12 11.2 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.84 3.47 34.7 9.2 2.55 25.5 │ │ Dec 2 deve 1.01 4.04 40.4 1.7 3.87 38.7 │ │ Dec 3 mid 1.10 4.36 43.6 2.1 4.14 41.4 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 4.32 43.2 3.2 4.00 40.0 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 4.29 42.9 3.0 3.99 39.9 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 4.52 45.2 4.5 4.07 40.7 │ │ Feb 1 late 0.96 4.15 41.5 6.0 3.55 35.5 │ │ Feb 2 late 0.68 3.08 30.8 7.5 2.33 23.3 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.40 1.90 9.5 3.2 1.26 6.3 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 427.9 173.1 302.6 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-31

Page 123: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-13: GROUNDNUT CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : GROUNDNUT Crop file : grondnut │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 35 25 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.55 -> 1.00 0.55 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 0.80 0.80 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.45 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 0.70 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : GROUNDNUT Planting date : 15 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 2 init 0.55 2.45 12.2 12.1 0.04 0.2 │ │ Nov 3 init 0.55 2.36 23.6 17.3 0.63 6.3 │ │ Dec 1 init 0.55 2.28 22.8 9.2 1.36 13.6 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.61 2.45 24.5 1.7 2.28 22.8 │ │ Dec 3 deve 0.74 2.94 29.4 2.1 2.73 27.3 │ │ Jan 1 deve 0.87 3.42 34.2 3.2 3.10 31.0 │ │ Jan 2 de/mi 0.97 3.77 37.7 3.0 3.48 34.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.00 4.11 41.1 4.5 3.66 36.6 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.00 4.32 43.2 6.0 3.72 37.2 │ │ Feb 2 mid 1.00 4.53 45.3 7.5 3.78 37.8 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.91 4.33 43.3 6.4 3.69 36.9 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.73 3.64 36.4 5.3 3.11 31.1 │ │ Mar 2 late 0.55 2.87 14.3 2.1 2.45 12.2 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 408.2 80.3 327.9 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-32

Page 124: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-14: POTATO CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : POTATO Crop file : potato │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 30 45 30 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.55 -> 1.10 0.70 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 0.60 0.60 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.25 -> 0.30 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.45 0.80 0.80 0.30 1.10 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : POTATO Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.55 2.49 24.9 31.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.55 2.45 24.5 24.1 0.04 0.4 │ │ Nov 3 in/de 0.60 2.56 25.6 17.3 0.83 8.3 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.73 3.04 30.4 9.2 2.12 21.2 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.92 3.66 36.6 1.7 3.49 34.9 │ │ Dec 3 de/mi 1.05 4.17 41.7 2.1 3.96 39.6 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 4.32 43.2 3.2 4.00 40.0 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 4.29 42.9 3.0 3.99 39.9 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 4.52 45.2 4.5 4.07 40.7 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.10 4.75 47.5 6.0 4.15 41.5 │ │ Feb 2 late 1.03 4.68 46.8 7.5 3.93 39.3 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.90 4.28 42.8 6.4 3.64 36.4 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.77 3.82 38.2 5.3 3.29 32.9 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 490.4 121.2 375.2 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-33

Page 125: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-15: FODDER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : FODDER Crop file : fodder │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 15 30 30 15 90 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 1.00 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.40 -> 0.40 0.40 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : FODDER Planting date : 15 October │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 init 1.00 4.69 23.5 22.4 0.21 1.1 │ │ Oct 3 init 1.00 4.61 46.1 37.9 0.82 8.2 │ │ Nov 1 deve 1.00 4.53 45.3 31.0 1.43 14.3 │ │ Nov 2 deve 1.00 4.45 44.5 24.1 2.04 20.4 │ │ Nov 3 deve 1.00 4.30 43.0 17.3 2.57 25.7 │ │ Dec 1 mid 1.00 4.14 41.4 9.2 3.23 32.3 │ │ Dec 2 mid 1.00 3.99 39.9 1.7 3.82 38.2 │ │ Dec 3 mid 1.00 3.96 39.6 2.1 3.75 37.5 │ │ Jan 1 late 1.00 3.93 39.3 3.2 3.61 36.1 │ │ Jan 2 late 1.00 3.90 19.5 1.5 3.60 18.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 382.1 150.5 231.6 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ IX-34

Page 126: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

    ANNEXURE‐I 

 

Crop No-16: SUGARCANE ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ┐ │ Crop data : SUGARCANE-AVE Crop file : sug │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 90 92 92 91 365 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.95 -> 0.95 0.95 ││ Rooting Depth [meter ] 1.50 -> 1.50 1.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.60 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.20 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : Geffect Climate Station: goplapur │ │ Crop : SUGARCANE-AVE Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.95 4.55 45.5 34.7 1.08 10.8 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.95 4.46 44.7 36.4 0.83 8.3 │ │ Jul 3 init 0.95 4.44 44.4 37.2 0.72 7.2 │ │ Aug 1 init 0.95 4.41 44.1 37.9 0.61 6.1 │ │ Aug 2 init 0.95 4.38 43.8 38.7 0.51 5.1 │ │ Aug 3 init 0.95 4.47 44.7 39.1 0.56 5.6 │ │ Sep 1 init 0.95 4.57 45.7 39.5 0.62 6.2 │ │ Sep 2 init 0.95 4.66 46.6 39.9 0.67 6.7 │ │ Sep 3 init 0.95 4.59 45.9 40.9 0.51 5.1 │ │ Oct 1 deve 0.95 4.53 45.3 43.2 0.21 2.1 │ │ Oct 2 deve 0.95 4.46 44.6 44.8 0.00 0.0 │ │ Oct 3 deve 0.95 4.38 43.8 37.9 0.59 5.9 │ │ Nov 1 deve 0.95 4.30 43.0 31.0 1.20 12.0 │ │ Nov 2 deve 0.95 4.23 42.3 24.1 1.82 18.2 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.95 4.08 40.8 17.3 2.35 23.5 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.95 3.94 39.4 9.2 3.02 30.2 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.95 3.79 37.9 1.7 3.62 36.2 │ │ Dec 3 deve 0.95 3.76 37.6 2.1 3.55 35.5 │ │ Jan 1 de/mi 0.95 3.73 37.3 3.2 3.41 34.1 │ │ Jan 2 mid 0.95 3.71 37.1 3.0 3.41 34.1 │ │ Jan 3 mid 0.95 3.90 39.0 4.5 3.46 34.6 │ │ Feb 1 mid 0.95 4.10 41.0 6.0 3.51 35.1 │ │ Feb 2 mid 0.95 4.30 43.0 7.5 3.56 35.6 │ │ Feb 3 mid 0.95 4.52 45.2 6.4 3.88 38.8 │ │ Mar 1 mid 0.95 4.73 47.3 5.3 4.21 42.1 │ │ Mar 2 mid 0.95 4.95 49.5 4.2 4.53 45.3 │ │ Mar 3 mid 0.95 4.92 49.2 4.4 4.47 44.7 │ │ Apr 1 mi/lt 0.95 4.89 48.9 4.7 4.42 44.2 │ │ Apr 2 late 0.95 4.85 48.5 4.9 4.36 43.6 │ │ Apr 3 late 0.95 4.96 49.6 7.6 4.20 42.0 │ │ May 1 late 0.95 5.06 50.6 9.5 4.10 41.0 │ │ May 2 late 0.95 5.16 51.6 11.9 3.97 39.7 │ │ May 3 late 0.95 5.01 50.1 18.0 3.21 32.1 │ │ Jun 1 late 0.95 4.87 48.7 24.8 2.39 23.9 │ │ Jun 2 late 0.95 4.72 47.2 31.2 1.60 16.0 │ │ Jun 3 late 0.95 4.64 46.4 33.0 1.34 13.4 │ │ Jul 1 late 0.95 4.55 22.8 17.3 1.08 5.4 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 1633.0 762.8 870.4 │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-35

Page 127: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Reference Evapotranspiration ETo according Penman-Monteith │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Country : india Meteo Station : Bhawani patna ( yr) │ │ Altitude : 261 meter Coordinates : 19.92 N.L. 83.18 E.L │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month MaxTemp MinTemp Humid. Wind Sunshine Sol.Radia ETo-PenMon │ │ °C °C % km/day hours MJ/m²/day mm/day │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ January 29.2 12.5 48 60 9.4 18.1 3.1 │ │ February 32.7 17.1 44 67 9.5 20.3 3.8 │ │ March 37.5 21.0 36 84 10.1 23.5 5.1 │ │ April 40.5 26.1 35 98 8.3 22.0 5.8 │ │ May 41.3 27.4 38 101 9.5 24.3 6.5 │ │ June 36.6 26.0 62 113 7.8 21.6 5.7 │ │ July 31.2 24.3 78 103 6.8 20.0 4.6 │ │ August 30.8 24.0 79 86 6.9 19.9 4.3 │ │ September 31.8 23.7 75 77 7.7 20.2 4.3 │ │ October 31.7 21.3 69 67 8.2 19.1 4.0 │ │ November 29.9 17.0 59 62 9.2 18.2 3.4 │ │ December 27.9 12.7 55 58 8.2 16.0 2.8 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ YEAR 33.4 21.1 56 81 8.5 20.3 1627 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Climate file : Climate Station : Bhawani patna │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ ET0 Rainfall Eff. Rain │ │ (mm/day) (mm/month) (mm/month) │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ January 3.1 8.6 8.5 │ │ February 3.8 14.7 14.4 │ │ March 5.1 13.5 13.2 │ │ April 5.8 26.6 25.4 │ │ May 6.5 37.9 35.6 │ │ June 5.7 219.3 142.4 │ │ July 4.6 319.8 157.0 │ │ August 4.3 346.2 159.6 │ │ September 4.3 208.7 139.0 │ │ October 4.0 72.0 63.7 │ │ November 3.4 15.6 15.2 │ │ December 2.8 3.4 3.4 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ YEAR Total 1627.0 1286.3 777.4 mm │ │ │ │ Effective Rainfall with USBR method │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-36

Page 128: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-1: E. PADDY ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : Bhawani patna Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : bhawcli Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 15 June │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ May 2 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.42 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.2 1.30 6.5 │ │ May 3 N/L 0.16 1.19 1.24 0.2 5.0 6.4 3.5 6.09 60.9 │ │ Jun 1 LP 0.55 1.15 3.79 0.8 8.1 12.7 20.3 10.68 106.8 │ │ Jun 2 L/A 0.89 1.11 5.67 1.3 4.1 11.0 45.7 6.48 64.8 │ │ Jun 3 A 1.00 1.10 5.90 1.5 0.0 7.4 51.7 2.23 22.3 │ │ Jul 1 A/B 1.00 1.10 5.47 1.5 0.0 7.0 52.0 1.77 17.7 │ │ Jul 2 B 1.00 1.08 5.01 1.5 0.0 6.5 52.3 1.27 12.7 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.07 4.83 1.5 0.0 6.3 52.6 1.07 10.7 │ │ Aug 1 B/C 1.00 1.05 4.67 1.5 0.0 6.2 52.9 0.88 8.8 │ │ Aug 2 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 53.2 0.74 7.4 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.9 0.97 9.7 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.0 1.06 10.6 │ │ Sep 2 C/D 1.00 1.03 4.47 1.4 0.0 5.8 48.3 1.01 10.1 │ │ Sep 3 D 1.00 0.97 4.07 1.1 0.0 5.1 39.3 1.21 12.1 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 0.88 3.61 0.7 0.0 4.3 29.6 1.31 13.1 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.80 3.17 0.2 0.0 3.4 10.1 2.36 11.8 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 642 176 180 999 613 386 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-37

Page 129: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-2: M. PADDY ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : Bhawani patna Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : bhawcli Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 21 June │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ May 3 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.41 0.0 1.6 2.0 1.0 1.94 17.4 │ │ Jun 1 N/L 0.26 1.18 1.81 0.4 7.5 9.7 9.5 8.72 87.2 │ │ Jun 2 LP 0.73 1.13 4.73 1.1 8.1 13.9 37.6 10.17 101.7 │ │ Jun 3 L/A 0.98 1.10 5.78 1.5 0.8 8.1 50.6 3.00 30.0 │ │ Jul 1 A 1.00 1.10 5.49 1.5 0.0 7.0 52.0 1.79 17.9 │ │ Jul 2 A/B 1.00 1.09 5.05 1.5 0.0 6.5 52.3 1.31 13.1 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.08 4.87 1.5 0.0 6.4 52.6 1.11 11.1 │ │ Aug 1 B 1.00 1.06 4.70 1.5 0.0 6.2 52.9 0.91 9.1 │ │ Aug 2 B/C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 53.2 0.74 7.4 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.9 0.97 9.7 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.0 1.06 10.6 │ │ Sep 2 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 48.3 1.22 12.2 │ │ Sep 3 C/D 1.00 1.01 4.27 1.3 0.0 5.5 39.3 1.61 16.1 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 0.93 3.81 0.9 0.0 4.7 29.6 1.77 17.7 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.85 3.37 0.5 0.0 3.8 20.2 1.82 18.2 │ │ Oct 3 D 1.00 0.77 2.89 0.0 0.0 2.9 1.5 2.75 2.8 │ ├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 628 176 180 984 602 382 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-38

Page 130: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-3: L. PADDY ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : Bhawani patna Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : bhawcli Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 1 July │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 1 NUR 0.10 1.20 0.72 0.2 1.8 2.7 3.7 2.30 23.0 │ │ Jun 2 LP 0.33 1.18 2.19 0.5 8.1 10.8 16.7 9.11 91.1 │ │ Jun 3 LP 0.78 1.13 4.68 1.2 8.1 13.9 40.1 9.93 99.3 │ │ Jul 1 A 1.00 1.10 5.49 1.5 0.0 7.0 52.0 1.79 17.9 │ │ Jul 2 A 1.00 1.10 5.08 1.5 0.0 6.6 52.3 1.35 13.5 │ │ Jul 3 B 1.00 1.09 4.94 1.5 0.0 6.4 52.6 1.18 11.8 │ │ Aug 1 B 1.00 1.07 4.77 1.5 0.0 6.3 52.9 0.97 9.7 │ │ Aug 2 B 1.00 1.06 4.59 1.5 0.0 6.1 53.2 0.77 7.7 │ │ Aug 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.9 0.97 9.7 │ │ Sep 1 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 50.0 1.06 10.6 │ │ Sep 2 C 1.00 1.05 4.56 1.5 0.0 6.1 48.3 1.22 12.2 │ │ Sep 3 C 1.00 1.05 4.42 1.5 0.0 5.9 39.3 1.99 19.9 │ │ Oct 1 D 1.00 1.01 4.12 1.3 0.0 5.4 29.6 2.41 24.1 │ │ Oct 2 D 1.00 0.92 3.66 0.9 0.0 4.5 20.2 2.51 25.1 │ │ Oct 3 D 1.00 0.84 3.17 0.4 0.0 3.6 15.2 2.09 20.9 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 615 179 180 974 577 397 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-39

Page 131: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-4: MAIZE CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : MAIZE Crop file : maize │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 40 30 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.45 -> 1.10 0.55 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.30 1.30 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.40 1.30 0.50 1.25 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : MAIZE Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.45 2.25 22.5 52.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.45 2.08 20.8 52.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 in/de 0.50 2.25 22.5 52.6 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 0.64 2.82 28.2 52.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 deve 0.82 3.57 35.7 53.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 deve 1.01 4.37 43.7 50.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.10 4.77 47.7 50.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.10 4.77 47.7 48.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 3 mid 1.10 4.63 46.3 39.3 0.70 7.0 │ │ Oct 1 mid 1.10 4.50 45.0 29.6 1.54 15.4 │ │ Oct 2 late 1.01 3.99 39.9 20.2 1.97 19.7 │ │ Oct 3 late 0.83 3.11 31.1 15.2 1.59 15.9 │ │ Nov 1 late 0.64 2.30 23.0 9.5 1.35 13.5 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 454.1 526.1 71.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-40

Page 132: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-5: BARLEY CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : Barley Crop file : barley │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 45 30 135 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.40 -> 1.15 0.40 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.10 1.10 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.90 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.20 0.60 0.50 0.40 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : Barley Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.40 2.00 20.0 52.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.40 1.85 18.5 52.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 in/de 0.45 2.05 20.5 52.6 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 0.61 2.72 27.2 52.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 deve 0.83 3.60 36.0 53.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 deve 1.04 4.53 45.3 50.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.15 4.99 49.9 50.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.15 4.99 49.9 48.3 0.16 1.6 │ │ Sep 3 mid 1.15 4.85 48.5 39.3 0.92 9.2 │ │ Oct 1 mid 1.15 4.70 47.0 29.6 1.74 17.4 │ │ Oct 2 mi/lt 1.09 4.31 43.1 20.2 2.28 22.8 │ │ Oct 3 late 0.90 3.39 33.9 15.2 1.88 18.8 │ │ Nov 1 late 0.65 2.33 23.3 9.5 1.38 13.8 │ │ Nov 2 late 0.40 1.36 6.8 2.0 0.95 4.7 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 469.8 528.1 88.3 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-41

Page 133: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-6: VEGETABLES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : VEGETABLES Crop file : vegg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 20 40 40 20 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.75 -> 1.10 0.95 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.25 -> 0.70 0.70 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.30 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : VEGETABLES Planting date : 15 June │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 2 init 0.75 4.31 21.5 25.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jun 3 init 0.75 4.03 40.3 51.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 1 in/de 0.77 3.85 38.5 52.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 deve 0.84 3.87 38.7 52.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 deve 0.93 4.19 41.9 52.6 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 deve 1.01 4.49 44.9 52.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 de/mi 1.08 4.68 46.8 53.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 mid 1.10 4.77 47.7 50.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 1 mid 1.10 4.77 47.7 50.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 2 mid 1.10 4.77 47.7 48.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 3 mi/lt 1.08 4.56 45.6 39.3 0.63 6.3 │ │ Oct 1 late 1.03 4.19 41.9 29.6 1.23 12.3 │ │ Oct 2 late 0.95 3.76 18.8 10.1 1.74 8.7 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 522.0 568.8 27.2 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-42

Page 134: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-7: FODDER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : FODDER Crop file : fodder │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 15 30 30 15 90 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 1.00 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.40 -> 0.40 0.40 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : FODDER Planting date : 15 June │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jun 2 init 1.00 5.74 28.7 25.7 0.59 3.0 │ │ Jun 3 init 1.00 5.37 53.7 51.7 0.19 1.9 │ │ Jul 1 deve 1.00 4.99 49.9 52.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 deve 1.00 4.62 46.2 52.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 deve 1.00 4.53 45.3 52.6 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 mid 1.00 4.43 44.3 52.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 mid 1.00 4.34 43.4 53.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 mid 1.00 4.34 43.4 50.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 1 late 1.00 4.34 43.4 50.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 2 late 1.00 4.34 21.7 24.2 0.00 0.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 420.0 465.6 4.9 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-43

Page 135: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-8: D. PADDY ============================================================================= Crop : PADDY Station : Bhawani patna Phase Nurs L.Prep A B C D Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Length stage 30 20 20 30 40 30 150 days Crop Coeffic. 1.20 --> 1.10 --> 1.05 0.80 Nursery Area 10 % Land Preparation 180 mm Percolation rate 1.5 mm/day ============================================================================= CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Rice Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├=============================================================================┤ │ Climate : bhawcli Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : PADDY Date of Transplant : 15 November │ │ Effective Rainfall: 0 % │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Stage Area Coeff ETcrop Perc. LPrep RiceRq EffRain IRReq. IRReq │ │ Decade % mm/day mm/dy mm/dy mm/day mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 NUR 0.05 1.20 0.25 0.0 0.9 1.2 0.5 1.10 5.5 │ │ Oct 3 N/L 0.16 1.19 0.74 0.2 5.0 5.9 2.5 5.69 56.9 │ │ Nov 1 LP 0.55 1.15 2.26 0.8 8.1 11.2 5.2 10.67 106.7 │ │ Nov 2 L/A 0.89 1.11 3.35 1.3 4.1 8.7 3.6 8.37 83.7 │ │ Nov 3 A 1.00 1.10 3.51 1.5 0.0 5.0 3.1 4.70 47.0 │ │ Dec 1 A/B 1.00 1.10 3.28 1.5 0.0 4.8 2.1 4.57 45.7 │ │ Dec 2 B 1.00 1.08 3.03 1.5 0.0 4.5 1.1 4.42 44.2 │ │ Dec 3 B 1.00 1.07 3.08 1.5 0.0 4.6 1.7 4.41 44.1 │ │ Jan 1 B/C 1.00 1.05 3.13 1.5 0.0 4.6 2.3 4.41 44.1 │ │ Jan 2 C 1.00 1.05 3.21 1.5 0.0 4.7 2.8 4.43 44.3 │ │ Jan 3 C 1.00 1.05 3.46 1.5 0.0 5.0 3.5 4.61 46.1 │ │ Feb 1 C 1.00 1.05 3.71 1.5 0.0 5.2 4.1 4.80 48.0 │ │ Feb 2 C/D 1.00 1.03 3.88 1.4 0.0 5.3 4.8 4.78 47.8 │ │ Feb 3 D 1.00 0.97 4.09 1.1 0.0 5.1 4.7 4.68 46.8 │ │ Mar 1 D 1.00 0.88 4.14 0.7 0.0 4.8 4.5 4.34 43.4 │ │ Mar 2 D 1.00 0.80 4.11 0.2 0.0 4.3 2.2 4.09 20.5 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Totals 471 176 180 823 49 775 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-44

Page 136: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-9: WHEAT CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : WHEAT Crop file : wheat │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 30 30 30 30 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.50 -> 1.20 0.60 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.70 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : WHEAT Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.50 1.79 17.9 9.5 0.84 8.4 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.50 1.70 17.0 4.1 1.29 12.9 │ │ Nov 3 init 0.50 1.60 16.0 3.1 1.29 12.9 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.62 1.85 18.5 2.1 1.64 16.4 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.85 2.38 23.8 1.1 2.27 22.7 │ │ Dec 3 deve 1.08 3.13 31.3 1.7 2.96 29.6 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.20 3.57 35.7 2.3 3.34 33.4 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.20 3.67 36.7 2.8 3.39 33.9 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.20 3.96 39.6 3.5 3.61 36.1 │ │ Feb 1 late 1.10 3.89 38.9 4.1 3.47 34.7 │ │ Feb 2 late 0.90 3.39 33.9 4.8 2.91 29.1 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.70 2.96 29.6 4.7 2.49 24.9 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 338.7 43.7 295.0 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-45

Page 137: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-10: PULSES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : pulses Crop file : pulsesg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 30 30 25 110 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.45 -> 1.15 0.60 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.60 0.80 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : pulses Planting date : 1 December │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Dec 1 init 0.45 1.35 13.5 2.1 1.14 11.4 │ │ Dec 2 init 0.45 1.26 12.6 1.1 1.15 11.5 │ │ Dec 3 in/de 0.51 1.47 14.7 1.7 1.30 13.0 │ │ Jan 1 deve 0.68 2.03 20.3 2.3 1.81 18.1 │ │ Jan 2 deve 0.92 2.80 28.1 2.8 2.52 25.2 │ │ Jan 3 de/mi 1.09 3.60 36.0 3.5 3.25 32.5 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.15 4.06 40.6 4.1 3.65 36.5 │ │ Feb 2 mid 1.15 4.34 43.4 4.8 3.86 38.6 │ │ Feb 3 mi/lt 1.10 4.63 46.3 4.7 4.16 41.6 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.93 4.36 43.6 4.5 3.90 39.0 │ │ Mar 2 late 0.71 3.65 36.5 4.4 3.21 32.1 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 335.4 36.0 299.4 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-46

Page 138: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-11: VEGETABLES CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : VEGETABLES Crop file : vegg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 20 40 40 20 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.75 -> 1.10 0.95 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.25 -> 0.70 0.70 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.30 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : VEGETABLES Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.75 2.69 26.8 9.5 1.74 17.4 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.75 2.54 25.4 4.1 2.14 21.4 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.79 2.53 25.3 3.1 2.23 22.3 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.88 2.64 26.4 2.1 2.43 24.3 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.97 2.71 27.1 1.1 2.60 26.0 │ │ Dec 3 deve 1.06 3.05 30.5 1.7 2.88 28.8 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 3.27 32.7 2.3 3.04 30.4 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 3.37 33.7 2.8 3.08 30.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 3.63 36.3 3.5 3.28 32.8 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.10 3.89 38.9 4.1 3.47 34.7 │ │ Feb 2 late 1.06 4.01 40.1 4.8 3.53 35.3 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.99 4.17 41.7 4.7 3.71 37.1 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 384.9 43.7 341.3 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-47

Page 139: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-12: POTATO CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : POTATO Crop file : potato │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 30 45 30 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.55 -> 1.10 0.70 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 0.60 0.60 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.25 -> 0.30 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.45 0.80 0.80 0.30 1.10 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : POTATO Planting date : 1 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 1 init 0.55 1.97 19.7 9.5 1.02 10.2 │ │ Nov 2 init 0.55 1.86 18.6 4.1 1.46 14.6 │ │ Nov 3 in/de 0.60 1.90 19.0 3.1 1.59 15.9 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.73 2.20 22.0 2.1 1.99 19.9 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.92 2.57 25.7 1.1 2.45 24.5 │ │ Dec 3 de/mi 1.05 3.04 30.4 1.7 2.87 28.7 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 3.27 32.7 2.3 3.04 30.4 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 3.37 33.7 2.8 3.08 30.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 3.63 36.3 3.5 3.28 32.8 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.10 3.89 38.9 4.1 3.47 34.7 │ │ Feb 2 late 1.03 3.90 39.0 4.8 3.42 34.2 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.90 3.80 38.0 4.7 3.34 33.4 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.77 3.59 35.9 4.5 3.14 31.4 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 389.8 48.2 341.6 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-48

Page 140: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-13: SUNFLOWER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : SUNFLOWER Crop file : oilsedg │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 40 40 25 130 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.40 -> 1.10 0.40 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 1.30 1.30 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.45 -> 0.50 0.80 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.80 0.95 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : SUNFLOWER Planting date : 15 October │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 init 0.40 1.58 7.9 10.1 0.00 0.0 │ │ Oct 3 init 0.40 1.51 15.1 15.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Nov 1 init 0.40 1.43 14.3 9.5 0.49 4.9 │ │ Nov 2 deve 0.49 1.65 16.5 4.1 1.25 12.5 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.66 2.12 21.2 3.1 1.81 18.1 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.84 2.51 25.1 2.1 2.30 23.0 │ │ Dec 2 deve 1.01 2.84 28.4 1.1 2.72 27.2 │ │ Dec 3 mid 1.10 3.18 31.8 1.7 3.01 30.1 │ │ Jan 1 mid 1.10 3.27 32.7 2.3 3.04 30.4 │ │ Jan 2 mid 1.10 3.37 33.7 2.8 3.08 30.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.10 3.63 36.3 3.5 3.28 32.8 │ │ Feb 1 late 0.96 3.39 33.9 4.1 2.98 29.8 │ │ Feb 2 late 0.68 2.56 25.6 4.8 2.08 20.8 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.40 1.69 8.5 2.3 1.22 6.1 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 330.8 66.6 266.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-49

Page 141: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-14: SUGARCANE CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : SUGARCANE-AVE Crop file : sug │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 90 92 92 91 365 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.95 -> 0.95 0.95 │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 1.50 -> 1.50 1.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.60 -> 0.60 0.60 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.20 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : SUGARCANE-AVE Planting date : 1 July │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Jul 1 init 0.95 4.74 47.4 52.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 2 init 0.95 4.39 43.9 52.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 3 init 0.95 4.30 43.0 52.6 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 1 init 0.95 4.21 42.1 52.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 2 init 0.95 4.12 41.2 53.2 0.00 0.0 │ │ Aug 3 init 0.95 4.12 41.2 50.9 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 1 init 0.95 4.12 41.2 50.0 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 2 init 0.95 4.12 41.2 48.3 0.00 0.0 │ │ Sep 3 init 0.95 4.00 40.0 39.3 0.07 0.7 │ │ Oct 1 deve 0.95 3.88 38.8 29.6 0.92 9.2 │ │ Oct 2 deve 0.95 3.76 37.6 20.2 1.74 17.4 │ │ Oct 3 deve 0.95 3.58 35.8 15.2 2.06 20.6 │ │ Nov 1 deve 0.95 3.40 34.0 9.5 2.46 24.6 │ │ Nov 2 deve 0.95 3.22 32.2 4.1 2.81 28.1 │ │ Nov 3 deve 0.95 3.03 30.3 3.1 2.73 27.3 │ │ Dec 1 deve 0.95 2.85 28.5 2.1 2.64 26.4 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.95 2.66 26.6 1.1 2.55 25.5 │ │ Dec 3 deve 0.95 2.74 27.4 1.7 2.57 25.7 │ │ Jan 1 de/mi 0.95 2.82 28.2 2.3 2.60 26.0 │ │ Jan 2 mid 0.95 2.91 29.1 2.8 2.62 26.2 │ │ Jan 3 mid 0.95 3.13 31.3 3.5 2.78 27.8 │ │ Feb 1 mid 0.95 3.36 33.6 4.1 2.94 29.4 │ │ Feb 2 mid 0.95 3.58 35.8 4.8 3.10 31.0 │ │ Feb 3 mid 0.95 4.02 40.2 4.7 3.55 35.5 │ │ Mar 1 mid 0.95 4.45 44.5 4.5 4.00 40.0 │ │ Mar 2 mid 0.95 4.88 48.8 4.4 4.44 44.4 │ │ Mar 3 mid 0.95 5.10 51.0 5.8 4.52 45.2 │ │ Apr 1 mi/lt 0.95 5.31 53.1 7.1 4.60 46.0 │ │ Apr 2 late 0.95 5.52 55.2 8.5 4.67 46.7 │ │ Apr 3 late 0.95 5.74 57.4 9.6 4.78 47.8 │ │ May 1 late 0.95 6.02 60.2 8.1 5.21 52.1 │ │ May 2 late 0.95 6.27 62.7 7.9 5.48 54.8 │ │ May 3 late 0.95 6.00 60.0 21.1 3.89 38.9 │ │ Jun 1 late 0.95 5.69 56.9 36.9 2.00 20.0 │ │ Jun 2 late 0.95 5.45 54.5 51.5 0.31 3.1 │ │ Jun 3 late 0.95 5.10 51.0 51.7 0.00 0.0 │ │ Jul 1 late 0.95 4.74 23.7 26.0 0.00 0.0 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 1549.8 803.4 820.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘IX-50

Page 142: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-15: GROUNDNUT CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : GROUNDNUT Crop file : grondnut │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 25 35 35 25 120 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 0.55 -> 1.00 0.55 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.30 -> 0.80 0.80 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.45 -> 0.45 0.50 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.40 0.70 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : GROUNDNUT Planting date : 15 November │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Nov 2 init 0.55 1.86 9.3 2.0 1.46 7.3 │ │ Nov 3 init 0.55 1.76 17.6 3.1 1.45 14.5 │ │ Dec 1 init 0.55 1.65 16.5 2.1 1.44 14.4 │ │ Dec 2 deve 0.61 1.72 17.2 1.1 1.61 16.1 │ │ Dec 3 deve 0.74 2.14 21.4 1.7 1.98 19.8 │ │ Jan 1 deve 0.87 2.59 25.9 2.3 2.36 23.6 │ │ Jan 2 de/mi 0.97 2.96 29.6 2.8 2.68 26.8 │ │ Jan 3 mid 1.00 3.30 33.0 3.5 2.95 29.5 │ │ Feb 1 mid 1.00 3.53 35.3 4.1 3.12 31.2 │ │ Feb 2 mid 1.00 3.77 37.7 4.8 3.29 32.9 │ │ Feb 3 late 0.91 3.85 38.5 4.7 3.38 33.8 │ │ Mar 1 late 0.73 3.42 34.2 4.5 2.97 29.7 │ │ Mar 2 late 0.55 2.83 14.1 2.2 2.39 11.9 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 330.3 38.9 291.4 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

IX-51

Page 143: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

ANNEXURE‐II 

 

Crop No-16: FODDER CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop data : FODDER Crop file : fodder │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Growth Stage Init Devel Mid Late Total │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Length Stage [days ] 15 30 30 15 90 │ │ Crop Coefficient [coeff.] 1.00 -> 1.00 1.00 │ │ │ │ Rooting Depth [meter ] 0.50 -> 0.50 0.50 │ │ Depletion level [fract.] 0.40 -> 0.40 0.40 │ │ Yield-response F.[coeff.] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ CROPWAT : 08 May 2010 ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Crop Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirements │ ├==========================================================================┤ │ Climate File : bhawcli Climate Station: Bhawani patna │ │ Crop : FODDER Planting date : 15 October │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Month Dec Stage Coeff ETcrop ETcrop Eff.Rain IRReq. IRReq. │ │ Kc mm/day mm/dec mm/dec mm/day mm/dec │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Oct 2 init 1.00 3.96 19.8 10.1 1.94 9.7 │ │ Oct 3 init 1.00 3.77 37.7 15.2 2.25 22.5 │ │ Nov 1 deve 1.00 3.58 35.8 9.5 2.63 26.3 │ │ Nov 2 deve 1.00 3.39 33.9 4.1 2.98 29.8 │ │ Nov 3 deve 1.00 3.19 31.9 3.1 2.89 28.9 │ │ Dec 1 mid 1.00 3.00 30.0 2.1 2.79 27.9 │ │ Dec 2 mid 1.00 2.80 28.0 1.1 2.69 26.9 │ │ Dec 3 mid 1.00 2.89 28.9 1.7 2.72 27.2 │ │ Jan 1 late 1.00 2.97 29.7 2.3 2.75 27.5 │ │ Jan 2 late 1.00 3.06 15.3 1.4 2.78 13.9 │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ TOTAL 291.0 50.5 240.5 │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ �

IX-52

Page 144: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-1

CHAPTER-10

COMMAND AREA

10.0 GENERAL

The Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I envisages construction of a 2600 m long Earthen Dam

1400 m long across Sananadi a tributary of Vanasadhara River on left side out falling near

Gunupur at 19° 8’17.4” N latitude and 83°52’39” E longitude near village Khaira in (near

Gunupur) Rayagada district of Odisha. The Left Main Canal having length of 54.40 km off

takes from Earthen Dam and irrigates 12946 ha CCA with several distribution Canal Systems.

The F.S.L at Head of Left Main Canal is kept 120 m.

Further, a Barrage of length 426.5 m is also proposed to construct on Vansadhara River near

village Panidangar (near Gudari) with 19° 22’53.5” N latitude and 83°45’39.7” E longitude.

The Right Main Canal having length of 36.45 km off-takes from proposed Barrage and irrigates

8105 ha CCA with its system. Further, 9.35 km long Gudari distributary off taking from left

bank of Panidanger Barrage irrigates 1099 ha of CCA. The FSL at the head of both the canals is

126.5 m.

The command area of the Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-1 lies in Rayagada and Gajapati

Districts of Odisha.

Sl. No Name Command Area (ha)

1 LMC offtaking from Sana Nadi Dam 12946

2 RMC and Guddary Distributary

offtaking from Panidongar Barrage

9204

Total 22150

10.1 PROPOSED CROPPING PATTERN

The greatest potential for groundwater development rests in conjunctive use with surface-

supply to alleviate the problems associated with hydrological uncertainty. Planning of

Integrated development of Surface and Groundwater resources ,with a view to enhance the use

of water resources optimally and to avoid problems such as water loggings, soil salinity, which

is now being increasingly realized in irrigated command, is need of present day water resources

Page 145: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-2

development requirement. In fact, National Water Policy enunciates that integrated and

coordinated development of surface water and ground water resources through conjunctive use

should be envisaged right from the project planning stage for such projects.

The selection of an optimum cropping pattern is governed by a number of complex factors viz.,

characteristics of soil, drainage requirements, general topography, climatic conditions, size and

type of farms, traditional crop practices, net return to the farmer and other factors that determine

market demand and prices. For a given project, the relative influence of these agro-climatic,

agro-economic and sociological conditions must be considered for arriving at the most suitable

cropping system i.e., crops and cropping pattern. The constraints of land and water availability

are of course to be taken into account. While projecting a cropping pattern and irrigation

intensity, other factors as relevant to optimal design of an irrigation system, (minimizing the

cost of irrigation facilities) are:

(i) Time Pattern of availability of Water: The cropping pattern should be such that the

seasonal/short duration irrigation requirements of the crop follow more or less, the time

pattern of availability of water from the sources (e.g. rivers/reservoirs, tanks,

groundwater, etc).

(ii) Reducing peak (or flattening of water demand: The peak water demand can be

minimized by synchronizing periods of peak and crops should water requirements with

the period of rainfall and/or low evaporative demand by adjusting seasonal cropping

intensities.

(iii) Minimizing total irrigation requirement: Optimum use of seasonal rainfall and water

stored in soil need to be planned to minimize total irrigation requirements. This

necessitates selection of crops with low seasonal irrigation requirements, and use of

efficient methods of field irrigation.

(iv) Feasibility: Actual crops, cropping patterns and cropping intensities very often differ

from the designed cropping pattern (and cropping intensities). While projecting most

suitable optimal cropping pattern, one must also consider constraints that may arise due

to canal capacity system and the land or water availability, and build into the system

required flexibility.

Based on these considerations, the proposed cropping for the command area Lower

Vansadhara Project, Stage 1 are as under:

Page 146: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-3

10.2 AGRICULTURE

10.2.1 Land Use Pattern

The entire command area is lying in the Rayagada and Gajapati District.

Irrigated and Rainfed Farm Practices

The rainfed crops are grown with the onset of monsoon intermittent dry spells usually occur

during the growing period. Farmers follow the repeated intercultural operation to save their

crops from moisture stress. Sometimes, heavy spells of rains cause severe loss to crop yields.

The surplus arrangements for runoff are adequate in sloppy lands but the temporary

waterlogging may occur in flat lands. The application of fertilizers is below the

recommendations in rainfed crops because of uncertainty of production. However, in irrigated

fields, farmers apply higher doses of input than what is recommended. The use of insecticides

is quite common in cotton and also other crops. There is adequate supply of agriculture input

and a large no. of private and co-operative retail outlets are distributed all over the area.

Farmers take all care that is required to grow irrigated dry crop, timely sowing, adequate

fertilization, timely inter-culture operations, irrigation, and water management, in paddy crop,

the above operations are not applied in right earnest.

10.2.2 Farmers’ Attitude

In general farmers are willing to adopt new technologies. But their financial status does not

allow them to grow high input crops. Farmers are aware about high yielding varieties and new

technologies. If irrigation facilities are developed the farmers will be willing to pay irrigation

charges and grow more remunerative crops. Paddy, which is main crop now, can be replaced

by other crops like pulses and oilseeds.

10.2.3 Extension Support

Extension support services should be made are available at Tehsil level. In this project an

extensive extension support will be required. Therefore, more extension officers may be posted

in the command area by reorganizing the available staff. In this respect, Agriculture

Department may reorganize the existing staff in the interest of the project.

Page 147: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-4

10.2.4 Strategy

It is proposed to make most effective use of water form Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage 1 for

irrigation of standing crops and also to store excess water for future use in tanks in the

command area. The water stored in tanks will be used when supply of water is not adequate for

meeting the requirement of standing crops, especially in Rabi and Summer seasons. It is also

proposed to make effective use of soil moisture preserved from rainfall by advancing the

planting of Rabi crops in such a way that the seeds of Rabi crops germinate before the soil

moisture is lost through soil evaporation. To meet the above objectives, the following strategies

are proposed for adoption:

(a) To maximise Kharif crop area

An attempt will be made to utilize rain water in Kharif season. For this, there is a need to

conserve soil moisture and then use it in all the command areas. Proper conservation and

utilisation of rain water will result in increase in the area of Kharif crops. Here, the crops with

low water requirement should be preferred over paddy.

(b) Promoting cash crops in Kharif season to maximize the use of available water

In Kharif season, the cultivation of vegetables will be given priority. In addition, crops like

groundnut, oilseeds, etc. which are highly responsive to irrigation should be adopted. On the

other hand, the traditional crops like paddy, maize, ragi, should be reduced in area owing to

their high water requirement and / or low productivity. Attempts should be made to advance

the planting of these crops so that crops make better use of rain water which is not feasible at

germination stage. If crops are well-established before the onset of monsoon, they can consume

water more efficiently.

(c) Supplementary irrigation to paddy crop

There is considerable area under wetlands in the command area where a traditional crop of

paddy is grown. In these areas, paddy is a productive and low risk crop which also provides

necessary staple food to the people. Due to uneven rainfall, it sometimes becomes essential to

provide irrigation to paddy crop. Paddy is a well-established crop of the area and farmers

cannot replace it with other crops in the near future. It is also desirable that farmers should be

encouraged to grow improved varieties/ hybrids of paddy crop along with intensive plant

protection measures and judicious use of inputs like fertilizers and wate

Page 148: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-5

(d) Emphasis on high value crops and plantation crops

High value crops like tobacco, oilseeds, groundnuts etc with low water requirement should be

introduced in the command area. In addition, plantation crops, which require little water after

initial growth and establishment are to be given priority. Plantation and other perennial crops

have low water requirement and usually require life saving irrigation in summer season, which

can be provided by tanks or ground water.

Fruit crops can also be promoted after considering their marketing facilities, processing and

local consumption. These crops survive on consumptive use of ground water after

establishment in initial years.

(e) Advancement of planting of Kharif crops

Nursery for paddy transplanting should be raised 2-3 weeks early, through ground water

irrigation. Thus the nursery will be ready for transplanting in early July immediately on the

onset of monsoon. The crop thus transplanted early has been proved to give higher yield with

consumption of the same quantity of water as compared to late planted crop.

Similarly, other Kharif crops like groundnut and maize also perform better if the crops have

established themselves in the field before actual start of the rainy season.

(f) Early planting of Rabi crops to make use of residual moisture

Advancement of Rabi sowing to September-October should be emphasized so that seeds may

germinate with residual moisture in the soil and the crop can be grown with one or two

irrigations in Rabi season. At initial germination stage, moisture is required in the top layer of

the soil which has to be provided by one pre-sowing irrigation under late sown condition. Thus

one irrigation can be saved by early sowing on residual soil moisture. If a crop germinates

satisfactorily, the plants can withstand adverse conditions at later stages of growth.

(g) Efficient use of late rains, tank and ground water for Rabi season crops

Agro-climatic conditions in the project area can support the crops throughout the year. In

general, the yield potential of crops are higher in Rabi season as compared to Kharif season.

But the cultivation in Rabi crop season mainly depends on irrigation from tanks or ground water

plus winter rains and conserved moisture from rainy season. To make judicious use of water

resources for Rabi crops, the following strategy is proposed:

i) Early sowing to make best possible use of conserved residual soil moisture

Page 149: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-6

ii) Growing crops having low water requirement like pulses: After harvesting of

Kharif crops, pulses like bengalgram, blackgram and greengram can be sown on

residual moisture. It will make double cropping feasible, thereby increasing the

income of farmers. Pulses (legumes) not only work as water savers but also

improve soil fertility by fixing atmospheric nitrogen in the soil though their

roots. Attempts are therefore, to be made to maximize area under pulses in Rabi

season.

iii) Adoption of efficient methods of irrigation for better use of tanks and ground

water resources. There is considerable loss of water through open flood method

of irrigation. It is advised that more efficient methods should be adopted to

minimize wastage of irrigation water. Use of pipes in place of open channels

can save water loss through leaching. Also, improvised methods can be adopted

for irrigation of wide spaced and plantation crops. In field crops, ridge and

furrows, contour or rings method of irrigation can be adopted depending upon

the crop and field conditions.

iv) Judicious use of water resources through pressurized irrigation systems: The

availability of water from tanks or ground water is limited in Rabi season. This

limited quantity of water can be efficiently used to cover maximum cropped area

by adopting sprinkler method for narrowly spaced crops and drip irrigation for

widely spaced and plantation crops. Crops like groundnut, vegetables, flowers

etc. can be successfully irrigated by sprinkler method, while crops like fruits and

vegetables can be grown with drip irrigation. Sprinkler and drip methods save

significant amount of irrigation water without adversely affecting productivity

and quality of produce.

v) Augmenting water storage capacity of tanks: It is, therefore, proposed that

water storage capacity should be increased by increasing the number of tanks

and / or increasing the capacity of existing tanks. Tanks not only supply

irrigation water in Rabi season, but also recharge soil moisture level in the

surrounding fields.

vi) Cultivation of high yield potential crops in Rabi season: In winter season,

remunerative crops like maize, vegetables and fruits should be given priority

over other crops.

vii) Allied enterprises: Where irrigation water is available, non-conventional

activities like flower cultivation, cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants

Page 150: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

X-7

like mentha, citronella, lemongrass etc., animal husbandry, fisheries, poultry etc.

can also be adopted to supplement the income of farmers.

10.2.7 Potential Problems

Input and credit support facilities are not adequate in project area. Market linkages are also

weak for the farm products. A large number of cooperative societies are functioning in the area

but their area of working has to be specifically defined. There is also need for aggressive

extension support and adaptive trials in command area. New technologies like drip irrigation

and sprinkler also need to be supported by extension department. With proper planning and

implementation potential problems can be overcome.

10.3 SOCIO–DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF COMMAND AREA

The command area lies in Rayagada and Gajapati districts. Likely population to be benefited by

the project is about 60000. Out of which 9500 Scheduled caste and 35000 scheduled tribe

people will be benefited. The Rayagada district as a whole has a population of about 8.30 Lakhs

and that of Gajapati district has a total population of 5.0 lakhs.

Page 151: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –11-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-11

FLOOD CONTROL

Flood control is not envisaged as a part of the project objective. However, due to creation

of reservoir, there will be flood moderation effect at downstream of Panidonger Barrage

constructed on Vansadhara River and Sana Nadi Dam. Such benefit is the secondary of the

project and hence it has not been taken into account while carrying out the benefit cost

analysis.

Page 152: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –12-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-12

DRAINAGE

With the introduction of irrigation in the project command, there will be recharging to the

groundwater table and it may create water logging and drainage problem in the command

area. Therefore, it is suggested that conjunctive use of the ground water may be encouraged

in the command area. While making irrigation planning in the present project, it has been

kept in mind that cropping pattern and water allowance is such that there is no excessive

groundwater recharging with introduction of irrigation.

Page 153: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –13-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-13

POWER

There is no power component in the present project as such no studies in this respect are required

to be done.

Page 154: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –14-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-14

NAVIGATION

Navigation is not proposed in the present project formulation hence no study is carried out

in respect of possibility of navigation as one of the project component.

Page 155: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –16-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-16

FOREIGN EXCHANGE ELEMENT

No foreign exchange element is anticipated. The plant and machinery items required are

manufactures and supplied within the country itself. Big Plants and machinery (if at all

required) are manufactured indigenously by some Indian companies with the complete

technical know-how.

Page 156: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-17

ENVIRONMENT, ECOLOGY AND FOREST ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT

17.1. INTRODUCTION

Government of Odisha has embarked upon an ambitious plan of harnessing the untapped

irrigation potential of various river basins of the state. Vansadhara river basin is one such

river basin which is proposed to be partly tapped for creating additional irrigation potential

in its lower reach through the proposed Lower Vansadhara Project. With the aim of

ameliorating the lot of the poor inhabitants of the area, this project has been taken up by the

Water Resources department of Govt. of Odisha and a Feasibility report has already been

prepared by WAPCOS Ltd. The subsequent work of detailed project has also been

entrusted to WAPCOS Ltd.

The river Vansadhara is an important east flowing river between Mahanadi and Godavari.

The river originates near Lanjigarh village in the Kalahandi district of Odisha. Flowing for

a distance of about 254 km in Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, it falls in to Bay of Bengal at

Kalingapatnam. The Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-I envisages construction of a 2600

m long Earthen Dam 1400 m long across Sananadi a tributary of Vanasadhara River on left

side out falling near Gunupur at 19° 8’17.4” N latitude and 83°52’39” E longitude near

village Khaira in (near Gunupur) Rayagada district of Odisha. The Left Main Canal having

length of 54.40 km off takes from Earthen Dam and irrigates 12946 ha CCA with several

distribution Canal Systems. The F.S.L at Head of Left Main Canal is kept 120 m.

Further, a Barrage of length 426.5 m is also proposed to construct on Vansadhara River

near village Panidangar (near Gudari) with 19° 22’53.5” N latitude and 83°45’39.7” E

longitude. The Right Main Canal having length of 36.45 km off-takes from proposed

Barrage and irrigates 8105 ha CCA with its system. Further, 9.35 km long Gudari

distributary off taking from left bank of Panidanger Barrage irrigates 1099 ha of CCA. The

FSL at the head of both the canals is 126.5 m.

Page 157: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-276-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

17.2 STAGES IN EIA STUDY

The purpose of this Section is to enumerate the steps in brief to be followed for conducting

an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study. The same are briefly described in the

following paragraphs.

Scoping: An exhaustive list of all likely impacts drawing information from as many sources

as possible is prepared. The next step is to select a manageable number of attributes, which

are likely to be affected as a result of the proposed project. The various criteria applied for

selection of the important impacts are as follows:

- magnitude

- extent

- significance- special sensitivity.

The Scoping Matrix proposed to be used as a part of the EIA study for the proposed project is

outlined in Table-17.1.

TABLE-17.1 Scoping Matrix for EIA study for the proposed projectAspect of Environment Likely Impacts

A. Land Environment

Construction phase - Increase in soil erosion- Pollution by construction spoils- Use of land for labour colonies- Problems due to muck disposal- Solid waste from labour colonies- Acquisition of land for various project

appurtenancesB. Water resources & water quality

Construction phase - Increase in turbidity of nearbyreceiving water bodies

- Degradation of water quality due todisposal of wastes from labour colonyand construction sites

Operation phase - Disruption of hydraulic regime- Sedimentation and siltation risks- Impacts on D.O. due to increased

Page 158: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-376-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Aspect of Environment Likely Impacts

residence time in reservoir- Eutrophication risks

C. Aquatic Ecology

Construction phase - Increased pressure on aquatic ecologyas a result of indiscriminate fishing.

- Reduced productivity due to increasein turbidity

Operation phase - Impacts on migratory fish species- Impacts on spawning and breeding

grounds- Degradation of riverine ecology

D. Terrestrial Ecology

Construction phase - Increased pressure on nearby forestsdue to labour force to meet their fuelwood and timber requirements

- Adverse impacts due to migration oflabour population

- Impacts on terrestrial flora- Impacts on nature reserves due to

various project appurtenances- Impacts on wildlife movement- Impacts on wildlife habitats- Impacts on diversity and productivity

of flora- Impacts on economically important

plant speciesE. Socio-Economics

Construction phase - Acquisition of land and privateproperties

- Impacts on archaeological & culturalmonuments

- Impacts on mineral reserves- Improved employment potential

during the project construction phase- Development of allied sectors leading

to greater employment- Pressure on existing infrastructure

facilities- Friction between guest and host

communityOperation phase - Increased revenue from power

generation

Page 159: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-476-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Aspect of Environment Likely Impacts

F. Air Pollution -

Construction Phase - Impacts due to emissions generated bycrushers and other equipment.

- Impacts due to increased vehicularmovement

- Fugitive emissions from varioussources.

G. Noise Pollution

Construction Phase - Noise due to operation of variousequipment

- Noise due to increased vehicularmovement

- Noise due to blasting activities

H. Public Health

Construction Phase - Increased incidence of water relateddiseases

- Transmission of diseases byimmigrant labour population

Operation phase - Increased incidence of vector bornediseases

The relevant environmental impacts out of the entire gamut of issues outlined in the Scoping

Matrix shall be identified. For these impacts or aspects, environmental baseline data shall be

collected from secondary as well as primary data sources.

Baseline study: Before the start of the project, it is essential to ascertain the baseline levels of

appropriate environmental parameters, which could be significantly affected by the

implementation of the project. The planning of baseline survey shall emanate from short-listing of

impacts prepared during identification. The baseline study involves both fieldwork and review of

existing documents, which is necessary for identification of data, which may already have been

collected for other purposes.

Impact prediction: is essentially a process to forecast the future environmental conditions of the

project area that might be expected to occur as a result of the construction and operation of the

proposed project. An attempt shall be made to forecast future environmental conditions

Page 160: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-576-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

quantitatively to the extent possible. But for certain parameters which cannot be quantified,

qualitative assessment shall be done so that planners and decision makers are aware of their

existence as well as their possible implications.

Environmental Management Plan: The approach for formulation of an Environmental

Management Plan (EMP) is to maximize the positive environmental impacts and minimize the

negative ones. The steps taken shall consist of modifications of plans, engineering designs,

construction schedules and techniques, as well as operational and management practices. After

selection of suitable environmental mitigation measures, cost required for implementation of

various management measures shall also be estimated, to have an idea of their cost-effectiveness.

Environmental Monitoring Programme: A post-project environmental monitoring programme shall

be suggested to oversee the environmental safeguards, to ascertain the agreement between

prediction and reality and to suggest remedial measures not foreseen during the planning stage but

arising during operation and to generate data for further use.

17.3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT

The baseline status on Environment has been described in the following sections.

17.3.1 Physio-Chemical Aspects

Meteorology

The climate of the project area comes under tropical monsoon type. The summer season starts

from March and continues upto May, followed by the rainy season from June upto end of

September. The months of October and November constitute the post-monsoon season. The

winter season lasts from December to February.

Temperature

The maximum temperature during summer days at Gopalpur is 41.9 °C and minimum temperature

is about 25°C. Minimum winter temperature recorded at Gopalpur is 9 °C. The maximum and

minimum mean temperature of the basin varies from 33°C to 7 °C respectively.

Page 161: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-676-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Humidity

In the project area, the relative humidity ranges between 88% to 93%. The relative humidity is

maximum in the month of August and minimum in the month of March.

Cloud cover

During Southwest monsoon, sky is generally over-cast. For the rest of the year, sky is generally

clear and lightly clouded. The maximum cloud cover is observed in the month of June and July

and minimum cloud cover is in December and January.

Winds

The main wind direction in the basin is between Southwest and Northwest during the first half of

the monsoon seasons. In the second half of the monsoon season, the wind direction is between

West and Northwest. The wind velocity varies from about 0.5 km /hr to 3.2 km/ hr on normal days.

17.3.2 Geology

Forming a part of the north-eastern extension of the peninsular shield, Orissa is by and large

underlain by Precambrian rocks. A little less than 25 per cent of the total area of the State is

constituted of the phenerozoic rocks, Quaternary formations and the Recent to Sub – Recent

alluvium. These latter are chiefly confined to the coastal tracts and the Brahmani and Mahanadi

valleys.

The Precambrian rocks are represented by politic, psammitic, pasamopelitic with subordinate

psephitic and calcareous rocks, metamorphosed in several grades and structurally deformed

different intensities, and transformed to various degrees. These sediments and meta sediments

occur as dissected patches separated by vast stretches of granites, ortho – and Para – gneisses,

injection gneisses, migmatites, Charnockites and basic and ultra basic intrusive and effusive rocks

mostly of mafic composition.

Represented among the Precambrian are the rocks of different faces reflecting the widely varying

tectonic environment in which they were deposited and / or emplaced. The tectonic – sedimentary

environments range from little differentiated (tectonically) permobile stage to well differentiated

platform – geosynclinals conditions.

Page 162: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-776-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

The phenerozoic rocks are represented by the Gondwana Super – Group encompassing upper

paleozoic to Middle Mesozoic, and the Baripada Beds of Lower Tertiary. The Gondwanas are of

non – marine continental facies, and the Lower Tertiary rocks indicate a marine environment.

17.3.3 Soils

The project area follows under the northern Eastern Ghats agro climatic zone. The north Eastern

Ghats agro climatic zone comprises of brown forest soils, sandy loam, loamy & clay, medium

textured. The soil type is loamy but in higher elevation the soil is rocky with small to big boulders.

17.3.4 Water quality

Based on literature review, water quality of river Vansadhara does not indicate presence of no

harmful ingredients in the water at intake site and water is suitable for meeting irrigation or

domestic water requirement. As a part of the EIA study, water quality of river Vansadhara at the

intake site shall be monitored. In addition, groundwater quality in the command area too will be

monitored at various locations to assess the suitability of water for meeting domestic and irrigation

requirements.

17.3.5 Ambient air quality

Based on the review of secondary data, ambient air quality of the command area can be considered

to be good. This is attributed to absence of large scale emissions from the air polluting industries.

Vehicular density is quite low in the area to cause any significant impact on the ambient air

quality.

As a part of the EIA study, it is proposed to monitor ambient air quality at various locations in the

project area. The parameters to be monitored shall be PM2.5 and PM10, Respirable Particulate

Matter (RPM), Sulphurdioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx).

Page 163: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-876-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

17.3.6 Ambient noise levels

As part of EIA Study a detailed ambient noise monitoring shall be carried out at various locations

in the project area. It is proposed to monitor hourly equivalent noise level during day time,

subsequently day time equivalent noise levels will be estimated and compared with permissible

standards.

17.3.7 Land use pattern

The total land required for the project is 1502.82 ha. The ownership details of the land to beacquired are as follows:

Govt. land : 43.06 ha Private land :867.33 ha Forest land: 592.43 ha

The present land use of the land to be acquired is either under forest, agriculture or barren, which

will be converted into water body (reservoir) on account of construction of the dam proposed in

the project. In addition landuse pattern will change due to construction of the canal network as

well. The landuse pattern of the command area will be converted from barren land to irrigated

agricultural land

The annual irrigation through Panidonger Barrage is for an area of 14819 ha with an intensity of

85%, 71% and 5% during Kharif, Ravi and Perennial seasons respectively. The area irrigated

during Kharif is 7824 ha while the area irrigated during Ravi is 6535 ha and during perennial in

460 ha.

The annual irrigation through Sana Nadi Dam is 20843 ha with an intensity of 85%, 71% and 5%

during Kharif, Ravi and Perennial seasons respectively. The area irrigated during Kharif is 11004

ha while the area irrigated during Ravi is 9192 ha and during perennial in 647 ha.

Page 164: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-976-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

17.4 ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS

17.4.1 Vegetation

The forest area is nearly 58,136 Sq Km which constitutes 37.34 % of the geographic area of the

state. While the reserved forests constitute 42.59 %, protected area as 26.7 % and unclassified

forest as 28.01 %. The geographic area of Rayagada district is 7073 km2. The total forest area is

nearly 3038 Sq km which is really 42.95 % of the geographical area. The total forest area covers

the dense forest, moderate dense forest, open forest and scrub. The moderately dense forest area is

nearly 1076 Sq km.

The project area is possesses varied vegetation types such as tropical semievergreen, tropical moist

mixed deciduous, tropical dry mixed deciduous, tropical riverine, scrub, savannah and grasslands.

Tropical semievergreen forests are found along the streams and narrow valleys possessing

Diospyros malabarica, Dillenia indica, Ficus racemosa, Litsea monopetala, Michelia champaca,

Firmiana colorata, Syzygium cuminii, Aphanamixis polystachya etc. The tropical moist deciduous

forests are found through out the hill range with prime representation of Adina cordifolia,

Pterocarpus marsupium, Ardisia solanacea, Careya arborea, Protium serratum, Schleichera oleosa,

Semecarpus anacardium, Syzygium operculatum, Xylia xylocarpa and Shorea robusta. In these

forests Anogeissus latifolia, Buchanania lanzan, Cleistanthus collinus, Diospyros melanoxylon,

Terminalia alata, Lagerstroemia parviflora, Madhuca longifolia, Gardenia gummifera and

Strychnos potatorum are some of the main species.

There are a number of threatened medicinal plant species are found in the area like Atylosia

cajanifolia, Ceropegia hirsuta, Chirita hamosa, Costus speciosus, Gloriosa superba, Rauvolfia

serpentina, Rubia cordifolia etc. In addition to it, there is a distinctive representation of orchids and

ferns.

A large number of non-timber forest products (NTFP) collection such as siali leaves (Bauhinia

vahlii), amla (Phyllanthus emblica), Harida (Terminalia chebula), Bahada (Terminalia bellirica),

char seeds (Buchanania lanzan), sal seed (Shorea robusta), mohua flower (Madhuca longifolia),

mango kernel (Mangifera indica), simul cotton (Bombax ceiba), Bael (Aegle marmelos) and hill

broom (Thysanolaena maxima) etc.

Page 165: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1076-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

17.4.2 FaunaThe predominant wildlife species including tiger, leopards, gaur, wild pig, sloth bear, pangolin,

palm civet, mouse deer, barking deer, four horned antelope, leopard cat, Indian wolf and sambhar

etc., most of which are in the IUCN Red List category. Recently, Golden gecko (Callodactylodes

aureus) has been discovered, which is considered as one of the rare lizards in India and endemic to

the Eastern Ghats.

17.4.3 FisheriesThe river Vamsadhara is considerably rich in fish fauna. The principal fish groups, which are

observed in the fresh water zone, include carps such as Labeo fimbriatus, Labeo calbasu and Catla

catla. Cat fish such as Mystus seenghala, M. aor, Silonia childrem, Wallage attu Pangasius

pangasius, Bagarius bagarius are also observed.

The command area has significant fisheries potential with respect to tanks and ponds fisheries. At

present, there are quite a few tanks and ponds where pisci-culture is being practiced. The fish

species cultured include Catla Catla (Catla), Labeo rohita (Rohu) Cirrhina mrigala (Marigal)

Cyprinus carpio.

17.5 PREDICTION OF IMPACTS

17.5.1 POSITIVE IMPACTS

The major anticipated positive impacts considered as a part of the study are listed as below:

Higher yields

Industrialization and urbanization

Improvement in livestock

Reduction in soil erosion

Improvement in socio-economic condition

i) Higher yieldsThe project will provide sustained irrigation over an area of 13968 ha. This will improve the

irrigation intensity and correspondingly the yields would increase resulting in increased agriculture

production.

Page 166: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

ii) Industrialization and urbanization

The proposed project will lead to a significant improvement leap in the agricultural production of

the command area. This, subsequently, will increase the money flow in the command areas. The

increased agricultural production will automatically lead to industrialization and demand for better

infrastructural facilities. There will be an increased migration in the command area as it will

provide better economic avenues in comparison with the surrounding area. There will be an

increase in small scale agro-based industries.

The secondary benefit of industrialization and higher crop yields is to increase the demand for

improvement in infrastructural facilities. This will lead to improvements in roads, communication,

markets, storage yards, service yards, etc. as tertiary benefits. The construction and operation of

these facilities will also lead to an improvement in the employment scenarios in the post-project

phase.

iii) Improvement in Livestock

The improvement in the irrigation in the command area will indirectly improve the quality of

livestock. The improvement in agriculture production would lead to increased availability of

fodder as a result of use of agriculture by products as fodder. This increased availability of fodder

will reduce the stresses on existing pastures. This is a significant positive impact.

iv) Reduction in soil erosion

After introduction of irrigation, there will be an increase is soil moisture, vegetal cover, and

improved land grading conditions which would help reducing soil erosion. Generally it has been

observed that with introduction of irrigation, the farm management practices improve resulting in

reduction of soil erosion from fauna.

v) Improvement in socio-economic conditions

In post-project phase, agricultural production will add to earnings in the pre-project phase. Inflow

of money will increase demands for services such as sewerage system, communication,

Page 167: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1276-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

transportation, recreation, schools, hospitals, etc. The presumed benefit of all these development is

generation of additional employment. This array of services can provide amenities hitherto lacking

and stimulate changes in the tasks performed by women in society and to the status of women

within the society. However, unless the aggregate supply of consumer goods and services available

to the workers and small farmers increases in proportion to the change in aggregate increases,

additional employment may only trigger a rise in price levels, leaving only owners of land and

capital on beneficiaries. These contingencies should be met with careful planning, construction,

operation and maintenance of infrastructure facilities.

17.5.2 NEGATIVE IMPACTS

Water Resources Projects, like all other development projects, contribute to many desirable and

undesirable environmental and social effects. A wide variety of subjects are of significance in

major water resources projects, encompassing physical sciences such as hydrology, landuse,

agricultural development; biological sciences such as forests, wildlife, social sciences such as

rehabilitation, human health and general poultry alleviation. All these issues have a bearing on the

overall environmental quality, both directly and indirectly. In recent years much public attention

has been focused on the dependence of development activities on the careful planning and

management of natural resources for ensuring sustainable development. This section deals with

anticipated negative impacts likely to result due to proposed project. The impacts are classified

under the following categories:

impacts due to project location

impacts due to project design

impact due to project construction

impacts due to project operation

i) Impacts due to project location

The potential impacts due to project location are:

displacement of population due to project appurtenances

loss of lands due to siting of the project components

Page 168: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1376-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

encroachment into forest lands and nature reserves and

Displacement of population due to canal network in the command area

The total land required for the project is 1502.82 ha. The ownership details of the land to beacquired are as follows:

Govt. land : 43.06 ha Private land :867.33 ha Forest land: 592.43 ha

The proposed canal network in the command area will pass through several villages. The

endeavour will be to avoid acquisition of homestead. However, village including

private/panchayat/government land is likely to be as a result of canal alignment through various

villages. Since the acquisition involves only of a narrow strip of land, there will not be any

displacement of population involved due to proposed canal network. However, adequate

compensation needs to be given as per the norms of National Policy for Resettlement &

Rehabilitation (2003).

Encroachment into forest land

Out of the total land of 1388 ha required for the project, about 146 ha of forest land is likely to be

acquired. Canal network passing through forest areas would lead to loss of forest resources and

impacts on vegetal cover and wildlife. These aspects shall be covered in detail as a part of the EIA

study. Compensatory afforestation programme as per applicable norms for the loss of forest lands

would be suggested as a part of the EIA study.

ii) Impacts due to project design

The potential impacts due to project design are:

disruption of hydrological balance

effect on water resources

Page 169: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1476-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Disruption of Hydrological balance

Sufficient water available in the river between February to October. However, during the months

from November to January, flow in river Vansadhara downstream of the proposed intake point

would be reduced considerably. As a part of the EIA study, the impacts on reduction in flow on

riverine ecology shall be ascertained.

Effect of Water Resources

The main objective of irrigation is to maintain the moisture content of the root zone above a given

level. This increases the soil moisture content. The higher soil moisture content decreases the

gradient of the downward flow near the surface and the infiltration as well. Since, a balance has to

be maintained, this process causes an increase in surface runoff. On the other hand, infiltration

through the surface is smaller due to the decreased tension difference. The positive accretion is

greater because the storage capacity is filled by irrigation water and therefore almost the total

amount of infiltrating precipitation reaches the water table. The other consequence of the

continuous high moisture content near the surface is the decrease of negative accretion. The

tension on the surface of the thicker water film is small and therefore part of the total potential

directed upwards is also reduced. Generally, it becomes smaller than the gravitational ground

water only if the water potential is near the surface. The excess recharge and the considerable

decrease is vertical drainage disturbs the natural balance of the ground water; hence irrigation

results in a continuous rise of the water table.

iii) Impacts due to construction works

The impacts due to project construction are generally short term in nature. Appropriate measures

should be included in the work plan. The impacts included in this category are:

soil erosion at construction sites pollution by construction spoils health risks

Page 170: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1576-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

Soil erosion at construction sites

Runoff from the unprotected excavated areas, quarry sites, can result in soil erosion. However, in

the proposed project a canal network is proposed to be constructed, the construction sites will be

linear in nature, level the effect of soil erosion will not be as severe as it is normally for a site like

dam, reservoir etc.

Pollution by construction spoils

The construction material will be required for various structures. Generally, such materials are

collected from nearby sites. Hence, a large quantity of earth work is likely to be excavated.

Normally construction waste is disposed in a haphazard manner, without proper disposal. This can

lead to water and land pollution. Appropriate management measures shall be suggested as a part of

the EIA study.

Health Risks

Generally, the workers during construction phase live in slum type conditions near the construction

sites. These sites do not have potable water or adequate sanitary condition. This can lead to

increased incidence of water-related diseases. Besides, migration of labour from adjacent areas or

labour already at site can be reservoir of infection of various diseases. This can put the entire

labour population of risk.

Proper care is also not given to drainage facilities in labour camps/colonies which can lead to

formation of small pool of stagnant water. This may serve as appropriate breeding sites for

mosquitoes and other vectors. It can also lead to increased incidence of vector borne diseases like

malaria.

iv) Impacts due to Project Operation

The project will increase the irrigation intensity thus leading to higher yields which will

subsequently reduce soil nutrients. It will lead to reduction in fertility which will be made up by

Page 171: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1676-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

the increased use of fertilizers. The possible environmental effects due to the project operation can

be summarised as follows:

Impacts on soil Changes in water quality and risk of eutrophication Increased incidence of water related diseases

Impacts on soil

The introduction of irrigation increases the cropping intensity which could cause change in soil

fertility, soil structure and texture. Another noteworthy impact is the reduction in permeability

which along-with rise in ground water level could result in water logging. The use of fertilizers is

likely to increase in the post project phase.

Changes in water quality and risk of eutrophication

Water quality is an important concern of any water resources project. The increased use of agro-

chemicals is one of the major sources of water pollution. As mentioned earlier, the continuous

irrigation increases the runoff. The agro-chemicals are also transported along-with runoff. The

runoff ultimately gets stored in a stagnant water body or small streams. In both the cases, the

increased concentration of agro-chemicals can cause eutrophication of water bodies. The project

will also lead to industrialization and urbanization. The effluent from these sources if disposed

without treatment can lead to water pollution.

Increased incidence of water related diseases

Major water related disease in the area is malaria. The malaria pathogens prevalent in the area are

P.vivax and P. falciperum. The common vectors are Anopheles culicifacies and A. fluviafilis. The

preferred environmental setting for vectors is fresh water open to sunshine or moderate shade.

The introduction of irrigation in command area can increase small ponds, standing agricultural

waters which are ideal breeding sites for vectors. Experience suggests that if adequate measures

are not taken, there could be increased incidence of malaria in the project operation phase.

Page 172: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1776-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

17.6 . ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

17.6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

i) Facilities in Labour Camps

It is proposed that it should be made mandatory for the contractor involved in the construction

activities to provide adequate facilities for water supply and sanitation in the labour camps. It is

recommended that the contractor provides living units of 30-40 m2 to each of the labour family

involved in the construction activities. The unit shall have proper ventilation.

Appropriate water supply sources shall be identified. Proper infrastructure for storage and if

required treatment e.g. disinfection or other units, shall also be provided. The labour population

migrating in the area during project construction phase shall live in labour camps/colonies. One

community toilet needs to be provided for 20 persons. The sewage from the community toilets can

be treated in a Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) comprising of aerated lagoon and secondary settling

tank.

ii) Provision of community kitchen and Free Fuel

A community kitchen could be provided where workers have their meals. The fuel used in such

community kitchens could be LPG or diesel. The project authority in association with the State

Government should make necessary arrangements for supply of kerosene/LPG. The fuel would be

supplied at subsidised rates to the local/contract labour for which provision should be kept in the

cost estimate.

iii) Solid waste management

The labour colonies will generate substantial amount of municipal wastes. Adequate facilities for

collection, conveyance and disposal of solid waste needs to be developed. For solid waste

collection, adequate number of masonry storage vats, each of 2 m3 capacity shall be constructed at

Page 173: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1876-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

appropriate locations in various labour camps. These vats shall be emptied at regular intervals and

the collected waste shall be transported to landfill sites. Covered trucks to collect the solid waste

from common collection point and transfer it to the disposal site shall be put to service. A suitable

landfill site shall be identified and designed to contain municipal waste from various project

township, labour colonies, etc.

iv) Restoration of construction sites

Normally the construction sites are left unreclaimed, with construction waste being left without

being properly disposed. In the proposed project, it is proposed to collect construction waste from

various construction sites, and disposed off at sites identified in consultation with the district

administration. Various construction sites would be properly levelled. The levelling or reclamation

of various construction sites, shall be made mandatory for the contractor.

17.6.2 MAINTENANCE OF WATER QUALITY

In the project operation phase, four or five project colonies are likely to be set up. It is proposed to

provide a sewage treatment plant comprising of aerated lagoon and secondary setting tank at

each colony for treatment of effluent before disposal.

17.6.3 HEALTH DELIVERY SYSTEM

The various measures for control of Public Health are listed as below:

Site selected for labour camps/colonies shall not be in the path of natural drainage.

Adequate drainage system to dispose storm water drainage from the labour colonies shall

be provided.

Adequate vaccination and immunization facilities shall be provided for workers at various

construction sites.

Labour camps and resettlement sites shall be at least 2 to 3 km away from quarry areas.

In the proposed project area, hospitals are already functional at district Rayagada. These hospitals

have adequate facilities in the terms of equipment, infrastructure and manpower. Hence, no

specific infrastructure development related to medical facilities is required. However, first-aid

posts manned by a doctor are recommended to be developed during construction phase at various

Page 174: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-1976-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

construction sites. The first-aid posts shall be located so that they are close to major construction

sites. These first-aid posts shall have the following facilities:

First aid box with essential medicines including ORS packets

First aid appliances-splints and dressing materials

Stretcher, wheel chair, etc.

17.6.4 SUSTENANCE & ENHANCEMENT OF FISHERIES POTENTIAL

The commissioning of the proposed project will increase the water availability in the command

area. Most of the tanks are seasonal in nature i.e. water is not available throughout the year for

pisci-culture. At present, the shortage of water has an adverse impact on their productivity. The

increase in water availability due to the proposed project will improve the productivity of existing

tanks and ponds, but will also lead to develop new tanks and ponds under pisciculture, coupled

with increased productivity from fish ponds will lead to significant increase in fish production.

17.6.5 CANAL BANK AND ROAD SIDE PLANTATION

The proposed project envisages construction of dam and canal network system .It is proposed to

develop plantation on both side of distributaries, which would improve the overall aesthetics of

the area.

17.6.6 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

Financial and credit facilities

The credit agencies through their various rural development schemes can play a very important

role. An optimal combination of short term, intermediate term and long term credits may be

formulated to provide maximum benefits to the command area population.

Marketing facilities and institutions

Improved marketing facilities and procedures contribute to waves of agricultural development

directly through providing greater use of a given level of production and indirectly by fostering

Page 175: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-2076-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

increased production. Inefficiencies in processing, storing and transporting agricultural produce

can cause actual loss of product.

Efforts shall also be made to develop the transportation and storage facilities. The co-operatives

can play a very important role in the marketing of agricultural commodities and supply of inputs

to the farmers. The cooperatives through interaction with government agencies, research institutes

can popularise new farm inputs, marketing facilities etc. These structures can be built as a part of

various rural development schemes of the state and central government.

17.6.7 TRAINING AND EXTENSION COURSES FOR FARMERS

The change from rainfed to irrigated cropping requires extension, training and demonstration

programmes for farmers. Considering these aspects it is proposed that the project authorities need

to provide adequate training to farmers. The training could cover the following aspects:

Prevention of spread of water related diseases Safe use of agro-chemicals Environmental conservation programmes.

17.6.8 NOISE CONTROL MEASURES

The effect of high noise levels on the labour population involved in construction activities is

particularly harmful. To prevent these effects, it has been recommended by international specialist

organizations (OSHA) that the exposure period of affected persons be limited. Alternatively,

they should be provided with effective personal protective measures such as ear muffs or ear

plugs to be worn during periods of exposure. The Noise specifications prescribed by OSHA are

given in Table-17.2.

TABLE-17.2 Maximum Exposure Periods specified by OSHA

Maximum equivalent continuous noise level

dB(A)

Unprotected exposure period per day for

8 hrs/day and 5 days/week (hrs)

90 8

Page 176: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-2176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

95 4

100 2

105 1

110 0.5

115 0.4

120 No exposure permitted at or above this

level

17.6.9 LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT

The following measures are recommended for improvement of livestock in the command area:

Measures to improve availability and quality of feed

Improvement in standard of nutrition by increasing the availability and quality of feed.

The proposed project would go a long way in improving the availability of fodder. The

improvement in marketing system to facilitate the movement of livestock and livestock products,

development of facilities to ensure easy availability to purchase inputs like drugs, draught oxen,

tools, etc., improvement in extension services by regular organization of field demonstration and

improvement in visual-aid facilities would lead to overall development of livestock in the project

area.

17.7 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

An Environmental Monitoring Programme should be undertaken during construction and operation

phase of the project. The details of environmental monitoring programme are given in Tables 17.3

and Table 17.4 respectively.

TABLE-17.3 Summary of Environmental Monitoring Programme during

Project Construction Phase

Page 177: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-2276-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

S.

N

o

.

Item Parameters Frequency Location

1. Treated Effluent

from STPs

at labour

camps

pH, BOD, TSS,

TDS

Once every month Before and after

treatment

from each

STPs

2. Water-related

diseases

Identification of

water

related

diseases,

adequacy of

local vector

control and

curative

measure,

etc.

Three times a year Labour camps and

colonies

3. Ambient Air

quality

PM2.5, PM10, SO2

and NOx

Three times a year At major

construction

sites

4. Ambient Noise

levels

Equivalent noise

level

Once every three

months

At major

construction

sites.

TABLE-17.4 Summary of Environmental Monitoring Programme during

Project Operation Phase

S.

N

o

.

Items Parameters Frequency Location

Page 178: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-2376-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

S.

N

o

.

Items Parameters Frequency Location

1. Water quality pH, Temperature, EC,

Turbidity, Total

Dissolved

Solids,

Calcium,

Magnesium,

Total Hardness,

Chlorides,

Sulphates,

Nitrates, DO.

COD, BOD,

Manganese,

Free Ammonia,

Total Kjeldahl

Nitrogen,

Boron, Percent

sodium,

phosphates,

Total coliforms,

Faecal

coliforms

Thrice a year Main canals and

distributaries

2. Soil pH, EC, texture,

organic matter

Once in a

year

Command area

3. Ecology Status of afforestation

programmes

along canal,

Pasture

Once every

year

-

Page 179: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVII-2476-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

S.

N

o

.

Items Parameters Frequency Location

development

4. Water-related

diseases

Identification of water-

related diseases,

sites, adequacy

of local vector

control

measures, etc.

Three times a

year

Villages adjacent to

canal alignment

and

representative

villages in the

command area

5. Socio-

economi

cs

Changes in population

growth, income

level,

infrastructure

development

Once in a

year

Command area

6. Landuse Landuse pattern using

satellite data

Once in a

year

Command area

Page 180: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project, Stage-1 Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –XVIII-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER 18

ESTIMATE

Refer Volume-II of Detailed Project Report.

Page 181: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited Page –19-176-C, Sector-18, GurgaonHaryana –122015

CHAPTER-19

FINANCIAL RESOURCES

19.0 INTRODUCTION

Under this chapter, financial resources to be covered are: (i) total resources of the state and

their utilization for developmental activities i.e. sector wise resource for the last five years; (ii)

present position of the scheme regarding its inclusion in the plan vis-à-vis concurrence of the

state planning finance department; (iii) provision for the sector / for the scheme in the plan;

(iv) central / foreign aid contemplated, if any; (v) commitment on the work in progress in the

plan and allocation available for staring new scheme; (vi) effect of inclusion of the scheme in

the plan on the schedule of other works in progress, budget and staff etc.; (vii) requirement of

funds for the scheme and its early phasing as in project report; (viii) adequate / strengthening

of organizational setup for execution for all projects together as contemplated and (ix)

advance action proposal for starting the preliminaries of the project, if any. Item wise

coverage is given below:

1) The State budget allotment for the last 6 years in Agricultural Sector is as follows:

2) Scheme will likely to be included in the coming budget plan (2013-2014).

3) Proposal for central and foreign aid is contemplated and proposals are being prepared

separately so that project can be executed and completed early.

4) Commitments on the works taken up under other schemes are met with and as mentioned

provision would be made from financial year 2012-13 onwards.

5) From the year 2012-13 funding pattern required for the scheme can be discussed and decided.

Year Total State Govt

Plan Ceiling (Rs

Lakhs)

State Plan Allocation (Rs.

Lakhs)

2004-2005 296356.0 5700.10

2005-06 226451.0 4862.58

2006-2007 310474.0 4808.00

2007-2008 462333.5 6065.03

Page 182: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-1 Haryana –122015

CHAPTER 20

BENEFIT COST RATIO, FINANCIAL RETURNS & INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

20.0 INTRODUCTION

It is natural for any investments, to search for a measure of the benefits likely to be derived

from investments in the project. Thus, the main purpose of undertaking the financial and

economic analysis appraisal of a project is to assess its capacity to maximize the efficient use

of natural resources.

In the analytical system followed for this project, the “with” and “without” situations are

compared based on constant prices at current levels both for financial and economic analysis.

The purpose of the economic analysis is to assess the real costs and benefits without distortions

due to taxes, subsidies, quotas or other factors influencing the value of the products and

services. The financial analysis is based not on economic values or shadow prices but on the

prices observed on the market. As such the purpose of financial analysis is to assess the

benefit of the project from the point of view of farmer or individuals directly getting the

benefits, whereas the economic analysis focus on the society as whole.

20.1 PROJECT EVALUATION METHODS

A wide variety of appraisal criteria (or evaluation methods) have been suggested in literature to

judge the worthiness of the investment in the projects. The important and popular in use can be

classified into two broad categories as (i) Discounting and (ii) Non Discounting criteria.

The important discounting criteria are: Net Present Value, Benefit Cost Ratio and internal rate

of Return. The popular non-discounting criteria are Payback period and Accounting rate of

return.

The Net present value of a project is equal to the sum of the present value of all the cash flows

(inflows as well as outflows) associated with it.

The discounted benefit – cost ratio is defined as ratio of present value of benefit and present

value of cost at social discount rate.

Page 183: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-2 Haryana –122015

The Payback period is the length of time required to recover the initial cash outlay on the

project.

The accounting rate of return also referred to, as the average rate of return, is a measure of

profitability, which relates income to investments both measure in accounting terms. It is the

ratio average income and initial investment.

The internal Rate of return (IRR) is defined as the rate of interest, at which, the discounted

benefits and the discounted cost over the stipulated life of the project are equal. The IRR based

on financial prices are denoted as FIRR and that based on economical prices are denoted as

EIRR.

20.2 CRITERIA FOR FINACIAL AND / OR ECONOMICAL VIABILITY

If a project is to be categorized as financially and/ or economically viable, the following

conditions must be satisfied.

1. The financial and economic viability of a project stipulates that the discounted benefits,

accruing as a result of the project developments, should exceed the discounted costs. This is

generally done by either estimating net present value (NPV) of the project i.e. net present

value of benefit minus net present value of cost or by determining the internal rate of return

(IRR). The particular discount rate, at which, the NPV of the project works out to be zero or

little higher than zero, should not be lower than the opportunity cost of capital, i.e the

appropriate social discounts rate.

2. The BCR must be equal to or higher than unity with a discount rate as enumerated in (i)

above.

3. The IRR must be equal to or higher than the appropriate social discount rate, or the

opportunity cost of capital.

4. The Payback period is less than a certain specified payback period.

5. The accounting rate of return should exceed a certain cut off rate of return

6. The opportunity cost of capital in this analysis is 10 % which is same as assumed by

World Bank for developing countries.

Page 184: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-3 Haryana –122015

From the theoretical point of view, the net present value method is clearly superior to all other

methods. For larger projects accounting rate of return and in more recent years, discounted

cash flow method are more commonly employed. For smaller projects the Pay back period

method appears to be popular. In U.S, Internal rate of return, Net Present value, Accounting

Rate of return and Payback period are the most popular methods of project appraisal.

20.3 METHODOLOGY FOR WORKING OUT NET AGRICULTURAL INCOME

For the financial and economical appraisal of the irrigation scheme, a series of budgets for

various crops of the designed cropping pattern have been prepared. Financial and Economic

crop budgets have been prepared for both the “Future Without” (FWOP) and “Future With “

(FWP) project situation. These crops budgets include estimation of the gross value of the

production and all direct production costs. The objective of working out the crop budgets is to

estimate the net return per ha of a cropped area.

20.4 CROP BUDGET

Crop productivity is influenced by many endogenous and exogenous factors. It cannot be

precisely predicted due to aberrations brought about by the unpredictable vagaries of nature

and unforeseen depredation by pest and disease. Further, it has neither fixed input, output,

coefficients of the type evinced in the industrial product nor can the aberrations be kept under

check as in case of experiments under controlled laboratory environments as in physics and

chemistry, So add to these the fact that reliable statistics on these are awfully lacking, it is

necessary to make certain assumptions regarding, input-output relationships and productivity

of crops under different situations.

Since there is a great deal of fluctuations in the market prices of various products and Govt.

regulate prices of certain inputs and outputs, the minimum support price where ever available

and the administered prices of above inputs have been taken into consideration for evaluating

cost of inputs and value of outputs for the entire post project period, for those items like bi-

products, the prevailing market price of the bi-product in the locality or its opportunity cost as

a substitute of other item, have been taken into consideration. The input prices of seeds,

fertilizers (with subsidy + taxes) have been adopted from while the prices of other input like

organic manure, wages of animal labour have been obtained from the locality. The labour wage

Page 185: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-4 Haryana –122015

has been taken as Rs.200/- per day which is minimum statutory prescribed by the Govt.

Changes in prices over time due to over all changes in prices have been ignored as these will

equally affect the input prices and output prices. Besides the fact that the installments payment

of loans and interest does not change over time due to changes in price level adds credence to

these assumptions.

Crop budgets were prepared for assessing the crop benefit which can be expected under

“without” as well as under “with” Project conditions. Crop budgets were first prepared in

financial price terms and then converted to economic terms, for selected crops as per the

envisaged cropping pattern of the project The Crops and their cropping pattern under present

and future both for “without” and “with” Project situations are given in Table No 20.1

20.4.1 ASSUMPTIONS

Certain assumptions were made in preparing the Financial/Economic crop budgets, as

discussed below:

a. The cost of inputs includes expenditure on seeds, fertilizers, manure, plant protection

chemicals, human labour, animal power, machine power and other costs, including

irrigation expenses, land revenue, depreciation on tools and implements, miscellaneous

expenses and interest on operating cost.( Refer Crop Budget tables in Annexure 20.1 and

20.2).

b. The gross crop value includes the value of the main produce and by-products. The crop

yield for main product , By-product, and seed requirement and their price as adopted in

the present study are given in Table 20.2 (A) through 20.2 (C).

c. That the prices of input and output of various crops will remain constant. The justification

of this lies in that the increase input and output prices will be counterbalanced by inflation.

d. That the life of irrigation canal system is 100 years.

e. Under irrigated conditions in “with” Project situation, returns can reasonably be expected

to be commensurate with investments in production inputs.

Page 186: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-5 Haryana –122015

f. Shift from the present use of local seeds under “without” Project situation, HYVs (High

Yielding Varieties) of seeds in the “with” Project future situation is envisaged in cereals,

pulses, and oil seeds, vegetable and other cash crops with improvement in cultivation

practices ,improved technology and management.

g. In the “with” project situation increase in the use of chemical fertilizers is envisaged in

line with the recommended practices and improved technology, and assuming optimal

availability of other inputs.

h. Presently, agriculture is highly labour-intensive. There are, however, marked peaks and

slacks in demand for labour in agriculture. Greater use of other agricultural inputs will

further increase the demand for labour. Since there is already unemployment and

underemployment of the agricultural labour force, any increase in demand for labour due

to the implementation of agriculture and water resources development projects is not

likely to pose any serious problem.

i. That the development of irrigation infrastructure will be integrated with other agricultural

activities to get full benefits of assured water supply

j. That necessary institutional support and services will be available from various

departments concerned with supply of inputs and disposal of the outputs so that the

farmers adopt full package of practices and take full benefits from assured water supply.

k. At present the use of animal power is minimal , and depends upon the agricultural

practices being followed and the type of crops grown . With the advent of modern

technology, coupled with mechanized agriculture, the use of animal power is likely to

continue to decline.

l. Presently the use of machine power is at a low level and is going to increase in future.

m. Depreciation has been considered only with respect to small tools and implements.

Certain items of storage, marketing payments to artisans etc., were considered as

miscellaneous expenses.

Page 187: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-6 Haryana –122015

n. That all extension activities will be geared to educate the farmers for making optimum

utilization of irrigation potential created and that the full projected level of output, income

and employment will be attained by the 7th year of initiation of the project.

o. That there will be hardly any changes in the exagenous factors (although not realistic)

influencing agricultural production.

p. That the necessary managerial set up will be provided to monitor the implementation

programme to attain the goals envisaged.

q. That the productivity of crops will be as envisaged in Table 20.2 (a) and 20.2 (b) with and

without modernization of the project respectively.

20.4.2 INPUT ITEMS FOR CROP BUDGET

The following input items were included in the crop budgets:

i) Value of seed

ii) Value of fertilizers

iii) Value of manure (FYM)

iv) Value of plant protection chemicals

v) Value of human labour (owned and hired)

vi) Value of animal power

vii) Value of machine power

viii) Value of water (only for “with” Project situation)

ix) Land revenue

x) Depreciation and Maintenance

xi) Transport cost

xii) Interest on working capital & miscellaneous expenditures

Costs of production per hectare of different crops are calculated by the Directorate of

Economics & Statistics, Govt. of India (GOI), starting from the lowest cost, representing actual

expenses in cash and kind incurred in production by the owner, or operator, under the heading

of operational costs, to the highest level, including all the values of the imputed costs. The

Page 188: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-7 Haryana –122015

primary intention of these calculations is to estimate the cost of production per quintal for

principal crops, so as to assist the Commission of Cost and Prices (CAC&P) in advising the

GOI how to establish procurement and support prices.

The practice of World Bank which is followed in the preparation of Staff Appraisal Reports

(SARS) on irrigation projects, only the expenses in cash and kind actually incurred by the

farmers are generally considered. However items of operational costs, like depreciation on

machinery and implements, land revenue, miscellaneous expenditures, interest on working

capital and expenditures like taxes etc. which are generally not considered in the World Bank

SARs, have been considered in preparing the crop budgets for the present study.

The input application without project has been gleaned from the past experience based on some

survey and extrapolated for some similar crops not covered in the survey. The input application

for the post project period have been obtained from the relevant Farm Planning and Guide

Book and agricultural practice manual which represents full package of practices under assured

water supply.

The current area under various crops representing the situation without project have been

extrapolated. The area under various crops in future situation have been derived from cropping

pattern optimization. The details irrigated and un-irrigated area under “Present”, “Future

without Project ” and “Future with Project” are given in Table No 20.1.

20.4.3 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CROP BUDGETS

Both financial and economic crop budgets, for the “without” and the “with” project situations

were developed for the present study. A summary of the financial and economic crop budget

covering yield, gross return, cost of production and net return computed for different crops for

present as well as future both for the “without” and “with” situations are presented, Table-

20.3 to Table-20.4. Financial and Economic crop prices used for preparing crop budgets both

for “without” and “with” project situations are given in Table No – 20.2 (a) and 20.2(b). The

Page 189: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-8 Haryana –122015

Financial and Economic Crop Budgets are presented in Annexure 20.1 and Annexure 20.2

respectively

20.4.4 INCREMENTAL AGRICULTURAL BENEFIT STREAM

In order to derive incremental net financial economic benefit streams for agricultural the

methodology described in the earlier paras, has been used. On the basis of net return per ha of

cropped area the benefit for one ha of net cultivated area was worked out under “Without” and

“With “ project situations. Taking into account the cropping pattern the incremental benefit

from the project area has been estimated. Since the construction of dam and other works will

be completed in the 3rd year itself, the partial irrigation will be available from the 4th year

onwards.

The farmer has already cultivating the land in command area and are well aware of crop

production. It has been assumed that 25 % benefits form the crop production will be achieved

in the 4th year, 50 % benefits in 5th

year and full development of crop production except

orange will be achieved in 7th

year of the project.

The year wise incremental income from the project is presented in Table No 20.46 and 20.50

for financial and economical analysis respectively. It has been assumed that once the project

reaches its full development stage in 7th

year the benefits will remain the same for the project

life.

20.5 PRICES

The entire analysis was done on constant prices. To estimate the gross return per hectare for

agricultural produce, various kinds of prices, such market prices (retail and wholesale), farm-

gate prices and administered prices (procurement and support) could be considered. For the

purpose of present analysis, the farm gate (post-harvest) prices were used. The farm gate

prices were obtained from the Season and Crop report of Directorate of Economics &

Statistics, for the years 2010-11 as well as obtained from field survey conducted in the project

command areas. For the agricultural by-products, the prices prevailing in the producing areas

during 2010-11 have been taken as the basis, because, first, there is no Government

Page 190: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-9 Haryana –122015

procurement of agricultural by-products, and second, the produced is assumed to be consumed

locally, obviating the necessity for any adjustment of transport cost and loss in transit.

20.5.1 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC UNIT PRICES

The financial prices of different inputs and outputs of different crops are based on the observed

prices in the local markets and are generally those reportedly paid or received by the farmers.

These financial prices were adjusted where necessary to reflect the opportunity cost to the

society, thus expressing the economic prices of inputs and outputs. For those items are

internally traded or substituting items traded on the international market, economic prices were

based on the World Bank's Commodity Price Projections given in the Global Economic

Prospects, 2007. Crop inputs or outputs not traded on the international market were priced on

the basis of their financial prices. The derivation of various financial and economic prices used

in the analysis and their detailed calculations are presented in Tables 20.7 to 20.9.

20.5.2 CONVERSION FACTORS

For economic analysis purposes, the costs and benefits of the Lower Vamsdhara have to be

evaluated at world market prices so as to measure correctly net economic benefits from this

project. These require certain adjustments, since, many items are not traded on the world

market and others are affected by tariffs and trade restrictions.

20.5.3 STANDARD CONVERSION FACTOR (SCF)

The benefits of the operation are evaluated at world market prices, i.e. they measure what India

would have to pay for imports or receive for exports. Most of the costs, however, are for items

that are not traded on the world market. Tariffs and trade restrictions introduce a distortion in

the price relationship between traded goods — valued at world market prices — and non—

traded goods — valued at local prices. Thus, the costs are not directly comparable with the

benefits. In order to make them compared, an SCF is applied to the price of non—traded goods

and consumption.

Page 191: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-10 Haryana –122015

Adjusting the financial prices to reflect economic values, involves determining an appropriate

premium attached to foreign exchange. The need to determine the foreign exchange premium

arises because in many countries, as a result of national trade policies (including tariffs on

imported goods and subsidies on export), a premium is paid on traded goods, above what is

paid for non- traded goods. The official exchange rate is, therefore, multiplied by the foreign

exchange premium which yields a shadow foreign exchange rate. The shadow exchange rate is

then used to convert the foreign exchange price of traded items into domestic currency.

The effect of using the shadow exchange rate is to make traded items relatively more expensive

in terms of domestic currency, by the amount of foreign exchange premium. This method is

often used, and the relationship between the official and the estimated exchange rates

constitutes what is called the Standard Conversion Factor (SCF).

In the absence of trade restrictions, the SCF can be approximately calculated using the formula:

mx TMSX

MXSCF

Where,

X = fob value of exports at the official exchange rate (OER);

M = cif value of imports at OER;

S = export subsidies;

Tm = import duties.

For India, SCF was assessed at 0.80 in 1980s, and subsequently at 0.85, to take account of the

real evolution of the economy and the Indian Rupee.

The rupee has now become a convertible currency, at the cost of substantial devaluation and an

overseas trade which is subject to less and less taxes, restrictions or subsidies. This means that

exchange rate of the Rupee, when compared with foreign currencies, is a fairly close reflection

of the shadow price of the foreign currencies, and therefore the SCF can be taken as equal to

one.

Page 192: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-11 Haryana –122015

20.5.4 Prices of Agricultural Outputs

The economic prices for traded goods such as rice, wheat, cotton, groundnuts, and sugarcane

are based on their border prices at the official exchange rate (OER). The domestic cost

components (i.e. local transport and marketing charges) are adjusted by the SCF of 0.80. The

economic prices for non—traded foodgrains (sorghum, maize and pulses are assumed to be

non—traded) are derived by applying a foodgrain conversion factor (FCF) to the financial

price. The FCF can be estimated with the following formula:

FCF =[ (Q rice x PE rice) ÷ (Q wheat x PE wheat)]/[(Q rice x PF rice) + (Q wheat x PF wheat)]

Where Q: Maharashtra production

PE: Economic border price

PF: Financial price

20.5.5 Prices of Agricultural Inputs

Fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides are potentially traded commodities; to make allowance

for taxes and subsidies and the total cost of transport and marketing, a conversion factor of

0.95 has been applied to the financial price . The financial price of bullocks and miscellaneous

charges have been multiplied by the SCF to express them in economic terms. Analyses of farm

labor supply and demand in various Indian irrigation projects typically give an economic

shadow wage rate for farm labor in the range of 1/2 to 2/3 of the average financial wage rate.

For the analysis of this project a shadow wage rate of 65% of the market wage has been

assumed.

Prices for traded items for which projections are not made, and for non-traded items, were

calculated by adjusting the financial prices. Local costs, excluding those for unskilled labour,

were adjusted by applying the Standard Conversion Factor of 1. Cost of unskilled labour was

adjusted by both the SCF and by the Shadow Wage Factor (SWF) of 0.50. The Economic

Conversion Factor (ECF) for unskilled labour is thus 0.50. The market wage rate is considered

to be a true reflection of the opportunity cost of skilled labour. The economic price of skilled

labour is valued at 100 percent of the market or financial rate.

Page 193: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-12 Haryana –122015

20.5.6 CONSTRUCTION CONVERSION FACTOR

The schemes would be constructed using a mixture of equipment, skilled and unskilled labor.

For the economic analysis, the CCF is estimated as follows:

(a) Traded Component — This component includes capital—intensive works which require

imported materials. Since it is traded, the conversion factor is 1.00. It is estimated that about

15% of the construction costs fall under this category.

(b) Non—Traded Component — This component includes works that require skilled labor and

locally manufactured materials.The SCF of 0.80 is used as the conversion factor for these

works. About 30% of the construction Costs are included in this category.

(c) Unskilled Labor. A minimum wage is in force in Orissa. Since daily workers virtually

never are paid above the minimum wage, it is likely that this wage is higher than the wage at

which the workers would be willing to work (i.e. their supply price). Civil works construction

is harder physical work than farming, and experience from similar areas in India indicates that

the laborers require a premium of 25%—30% to shift from agriculture to construction work.

By comparison with agricultural wages in the State, it is estimated that the construction

laborers’ supply price is about 15% to 20% below the minimum wage. This gives a shadow

wage factor which is l0%—20% below the SCF, or approximately equal to 0.65. It is estimated

that unskilled labor consti— tutes about 55% of the construction cost.

Conversion Factor

Traded Items 1.00

Non—traded Items 0.80

Unskilled Labor 0.65

Construction Costs

(weighted average) 0.85

The resultant conversion factor for project construction costs i.e. 85%. This is the factor by

which the financial cost of the works expressed at the market price was multiplied to obtain the

shadow price for these works.

Page 194: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-13 Haryana –122015

20.5.7 LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT COSTS

Costs of the operation include the cost of resettling families from villages submerged by the

reservoirs. The economic cost of resettlement is calculated by multiplying the financial cost by

the construction conversion factor (CCF). Where the cost of land acquisition is concerned, the

real cost to society is the opportunity cost, that is, the production foregone by the submersion

of the land in the reservoirs and the loss of lands acquired for the construction of the

distribution system. The per ha value of production in the future “without project” situation

was taken to represent this opportunity cost and deducted from the benefit stream.

20.5.8 CONVERSION FACTOR FOR O & M COSTS

Conversion factors for O & M involve two components which are (i) employment of unskilled

labour and (ii) materials and equipment with traded and non-traded components. The

Conversion Factors (CF) derived for O&M was also multiplied by 85%.

20.6 PROJECT BENEFITS

The first 4 years of the project have been reckoned as construction period. Hence the cropping

pattern in vogue remain the same as in the current period. Commencing with the 7th

year the

farmer will start reaping the full benefit of assured water supply. The extension activities

should be geared from the very 1st year of construction to motivate the farmers to switch on to

the proposed cropping pattern and adopt modern technology so that they follow the

recommended practices and take full benefit of assured water supply. To attain this objective,

CADA, Agriculture Department may conduct one experiment in each panchayat in the

farmers’ field on the benefits of full package of practices where irrigation is available and

impart certain training to farmers on water management. Since these are part and parcel of the

activities of CADA works and Agriculture Department, no separate budgetary provision need

be made in the project for this work. There should be a vigorous extension effort by the district

authorities to produce biofertiliser, Rhyzobium culture, compost manure, agricultural

machinery, pesticides, and distribute inputs like high yielding variety of paddy, seeds,

Page 195: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-14 Haryana –122015

fertilizers etc. Further programmes have been made for imparting certain on farm training to

the farmers on different aspects of agriculture. It is expected that all these efforts will boost up

agricultural production and full package of practices will be adopted with the commencement

of the seventh year.

The quantum of various resources used in raising different crops during the kharif and rabi

season in the pre-project period have been adopted from the information available for the

project area.

20.6.1 Direct benefits

i) Incremental Crop Production

The development of Lower Vamsdhara Scheme would allow intensive farming of 22150 ha of

area under cultivation. Irrigation will also allow full use of the land which is not cultivated

under current farming practices. The incremental production of crops from the developed land

would be the benefit to the society. In addition, extra production will contribute to local food

grains supplies and reduce regional and national food grains deficits. The actual and

incremental production of cereal, oilseed and other crops due to project are summarized below:

ii) Increased Employment

The implementation of Irrigation Scheme will create employment opportunities in the project

area. The employment is associated with improved farming practices as well as the

construction of the irrigation scheme. With irrigation additional farm labour would also be

required as a result of higher cropping intensity through double cropping providing

employment opportunities to local people within and outside the vicinity of the project area.

20.6.2 INDIRECT BENEFITS

This impact of project outcome accuring from several indirect and secondary non-farm benefit

may originate from the production aspect of the project as the value added and employment

opportunity generated by processing and new marketing activities, like transportation and

storage services.

Page 196: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-15 Haryana –122015

The impact is also felt in the increase in family working hours and increase in employment

opportunities of the wage earners, the latter get employment during slack season and higher

wages during peak load period. Besides a great deal of indirect employment opportunities in

the processing storage, transportation and marketing fields will also be generated in the non-

farm activities, emanating from the output enhancement of the agricultural sector.

Other employment opportunity may emerge from the secondary or side effect of the project in

the form of providing services for recreation, health, power, education facilities in the area.

Other social benefits are redistribution of income, eradication of poverty and increase in

standard of living in the rural areas.

This will also reduce the tendency of migration of rural people to urban areas.

The inclusion of indirect and secondary costs and benefits is very important element in

economic justification of the project, particularly in a state like Orissa where physical

resources are either idle or under utilized and where one of the most important purpose of the

project is to absorb the unused and under used factors of production and increase their

efficiencies.

Most of these impact effects are of subjective nature and difficult to measure quantitatively.

However, it is now time for the economist to derive input output, coefficients for these indirect

and secondary costs and benefits to gauge the full outcome of the project. This will satisfy the

advocate suggesting realization of full cost of the irrigation works from the farming community

by levying irrigation taxes. In a nutshell, the indirect, secondary cost and benefit accruing from

the project cannot be overlooked for the purpose of measuring the full impact of the project

and for expressing a judgment on its social worthiness.

i) Poverty Eradication/Food security

Improved crop production through the commissioning of the irrigation scheme will increase

farm income in the project area. Food supply will increase and there will be cash income

available for food or other purchases.

Page 197: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-16 Haryana –122015

ii) Risk benefits

Project Districts Administration vis–a-vis State Govt. risks are considerably reduced through

irrigation and the higher cropping intensities will protect the authorities against shortfall in

crop production. With the existing population structure and its rapid growth in the project area,

the long term benefits from irrigation are even more important. Reliable water supplies along

with improved package of agricultural practices may encourage farmers to go for round the

year crop production to take advantage of market conditions.

iii) Transfer of Technology

Project Districts Agricultural Departments will be in a sound position to introduce modern

agricultural technology and farming practices to retain the fertility status of the soil with the

installation of the irrigation scheme. This may also serve as a demonstration to other farmers

in the region.

iv) Health and Nutrition

Increased cash income resulting from increased crop production and employment opportunities

would result in higher per capita consumption of a greater variety of food items. This in turn

will improve the nutrition levels of the people in the project area.

v) Environmental Facility

The irrigation scheme will improve the overall environmental and ecological situations in the

project area which in turn will reduce the health hazard.

20.7 MARKETING OUTLOOK

The marketing of increased agriculture output resulting from modernization programme will

not pose any serious problem firstly, because the crops like rice, pulses, vegetables, oil seeds,

proposed to be grown in the post project period are traditional crops of the localities meant for

local consumption. Thus it has got a vast unsatiated local market which can absorb the

additional output with the increase in employment and income of the farmers and non farm

rural people secondly there are a number of oil mills in the locality to mop up the oilseeds

crops. Thirdly, the infrastructure like storage, transportation and other communication facilities

Page 198: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-17 Haryana –122015

are well developed to convey the surplus product of these commodities and other perishable

commodities, like vegetables, from the producing area to the urban markets.

Supply and distribution of input will not also pose any problem as there are a number of retail

outlets for supply and distribution of all agricultural inputs in the rural area. The minimum

support prices of agriculture commodities are announced by the Agricultural price Commission

well ahead of the commencement of the cropping season. These support prices based on the

survey, through cost accounting method, on the cost of production of various major crops in

various parts of the country. The prices of some of the important input like fertilizer, seeds etc.

are regulated by the Government. It is expected that these regulatory activities will prevail

thoughout the post project period, notwithstanding the liberalization policy of the Govt.

8.8 PROJECT COST

20.8.1 PROJECT FINANCIAL COST

The total financial cost of the project is Rs. 6114 Million. The 87 % expenditure will be

incurred during the first four years and the remaining 13 % amount shall be paid to the

contractor in fifth year. Operation and Maintenance ( O & M ) cost at the rate of 1200 per ha

has been assumed from 4th

year onward. The year wise project cost and O & M have also been

given in the Table No 20.5 for financial analysis.

20.8.2 PROJECT ECONOMICAL COST

The economic cost includes capital investment and O & M cost of the proposed irrigation

scheme. The economic cost has been obtained after adjusting the financial cost for opportunity

cost, taxes and standard conversion factor. The same parameters have been applied for

estimating economic cost, as has been applied foe estimating the economic benefits. Details for

estimating economic prices and standard conversion factor are given in the earlier para and

results are given in Table 20.6.

20.9 FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – RESULT

20.9.1 Financial Analysis

Page 199: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-18 Haryana –122015

Project analysis has been carried out to cover as total period of 100 years from the year of the

start of the construction of the project. The year wise net incremental return in the “with”

project situation over “without” project situation has been computed as under and given under

20.5.

Net Incremental Return = Net return in “with” Project situation minus Net return in the

“without” Project situation.

The flow of costs and benefits has been discounted at base discount rates (10%) to formulate

discounted cash flow streams. The Table–20.5 gives the year wise project investment costs,

O&M costs, and total investment costs. The table 20.5 gives the financial IRR calculation with

project net incremental return and net cash flow stream calculated at the base discount rate. It

also gives the FIRR i.e. discount rate, at which with the stream of cash flow, will give zero Net

Project Value or Net Project Value tends to zero at the end year of the evaluated period. The

Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) for this project is found to be 15.31 % percent and

NPV value at 10% discount rate works out to be Rs 3534 million.

20.9.2 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Derivation of economic prices for the purpose of economic analysis are discussed in earlier

para. The net economic benefit of the project area are given in Table 20.6. The Economic

Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) produced by the 100 year net cash flow is 18.86% percent and

NPV value at 10% discount rate works out to be Rs.4930 million and is given in Table 20.6.

20.9.3 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The sensitivity analysis was carried out both for financial and economic cash flows with

various increase in cost as well as with various decrease in benefit. The Result of the same are

given in table below.

Page 200: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-19 Haryana –122015

Sensitivity of Financial Analysis

IRR Discounted B/C

Ratio NPV

Pay Back

Period

Accounting

rate of

Return

A. No Change in Cost & Benefit 15.31% 1.73 3534 10.1 21.2%

B. Changes in Cost only

1. Cost increase by 5.0 % 14.77% 1.65 3293 10.3 21.2%

2. Cost increase by 10.0 % 14.27% 1.58 3052 10.5 21.2%

3. Cost increase by 20.0 % 13.37% 1.45 2571 11.0 21.1%

C. Changes in Benefit only

1. Benefit increase by 5.0 % 15.87% 1.82 3951 9.9 22.3%

2. Benefit increase by 10.0 % 16.41% 1.91 4368 9.7 23.4%

3. Benefit increase by 20.0 % 17.45% 2.08 5203 9.3 25.5%

D. Change in cost and benefit both 7. Cost Changes by10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by -10.0 % 13.18% 1.42 2218 11.1

19.0% 8. Cost Changes by20.0 % & '

Benefit changes by -20.0 % 11.24% 1.16 902 12.3

16.8%

9. Cost Changes by-10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 10.0 % 17.68% 2.12 4850 9.3

23.4% 10. Cost Changes by-20.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 20.0 % 20.35% 2.60 6165 8.6

25.6% 11. Cost Changes by10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 10.0 % 15.31% 1.73 3887 10.1

23.3%

Sensitivity of Economic Analysis

IRR Discounted B/C

Ratio NPV

Pay Back

Period

Accounting

rate of

Return

A. No Change in Cost & Benefit 18.86% 2.21 4930 8.7 25.5%

B. Changes in Cost only

1. Cost increase by 5.0 % 18.19% 2.10 4725 8.9 25.5%

2. Cost increase by 10.0 % 17.56% 2.00 4521 9.1 25.4%

3. Cost increase by 20.0 % 16.43% 1.84 4112 9.5 25.4%

C. Changes in Benefit only

1. Benefit increase by 5.0 % 19.56% 2.32 5381 8.5 26.8%

2. Benefit increase by 10.0 % 20.24% 2.43 5832 8.4 28.1%

3. Benefit increase by 20.0 % 21.56% 2.65 6734 8.1 30.6%

D. Change in cost and benefit both

7. Cost Changes by10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by -10.0 % 16.20% 1.80 3619 9.5

22.9% 8. Cost Changes by20.0 % & '

Benefit changes by -20.0 % 13.78% 1.47 2307 10.6

20.3% 9. Cost Changes by-10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 10.0 % 21.85% 2.70 6241 8.0

28.1% 10. Cost Changes by-20.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 20.0 % 25.22% 3.31 7552 7.5

30.7% 11. Cost Changes by10.0 % & '

Benefit changes by 10.0 % 18.86% 2.21 5423 8.7

28.0%

Page 201: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansdhara Project Detailed Project Report

WAPCOS Limited

76-C, Sector-18, Gurgaon XX-20 Haryana –122015

20.9.4 CONVENTIONAL B-C RATIO

The conventional B-C Ratio as per CWC guidelines was observed to be 2.27 as given below.

Benefit Cost Ratio

1. Annual Benefit Million Rs.

i Annual benefit under with project situation 2006

ii. Annual benefit under without project situation 571

Net incremental Annual benefit (i-ii) 1436

2. Annual Cost

i Interest on capital @10% of total cost 611.40

ii Cost of Maintenance Irrigation command and Canal system 21.06

Annual costs (i to vii) 632.46

3. Benefit - Cost Ratio 2.27

Page 202: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop

KHARIF

Cropping Intensity

(%)

Cropped Area (Ha)

Cropping Intensity (%)

Cropped Area (Ha)

Cropping Intensity

(%)

Cropped Area (Ha)

1 Paddy 40.0% 7019 44.0% 7721 70.0% 122842 Maize 15.0% 2632 16.5% 2895 5.0% 8773 Ragi 20.0% 3510 22.0% 3861 5.0% 8774 Vegetables 2.0% 351 2.2% 386 3.0% 5265 Fodder 0.5% 88 0.6% 97 2.0% 351

RABI6 Paddy 10.0% 1755 11.0% 1930 20.0% 35107 Grondnut 1.0% 175 1.1% 193 3.0% 5268 Vegetables 0.5% 88 0.6% 97 3.0% 5269 Potato 2.0% 351 2.2% 386 3.0% 52610 Wheat 15.0% 2632 16.5% 2895 30.0% 526411 Sunflower 0.2% 35 0.2% 39 3.0% 52612 Sugarcane 1.0% 175 1.1% 193 5.0% 87713 Mustered 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Table- 20.1

Sl. No

Present Future without Project Future With Project

Cropping Pattern in Present and Future Situation

Page 203: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Sl. No.

Crop Name

Crop Yield in Present Situation

( Quintal/ha)

Crop Yield Future Without Project

Situation ( Quintal/ha)

Crop Yield in FutureWith Project

( Quintal/ha)

Financial (Unit Price )

Conversion FactorEconomic Unit

Price

KHARIF 1 Paddy 25.00 30.00 55.00 1389.80 1.00 1389.82 Maize 20.00 22.00 45.00 920.50 1.00 920.53 Ragi 10.00 15.00 35.00 1005.50 1.00 1005.54 Vegetables 80.00 150.00 200.00 600.00 1.00 6005 Fodder 100.00 200.00 400.00 60.00 0.00 0

RABI6 Paddy 25.00 30.00 55.00 1389.80 1.00 1389.87 Grondnut 8.50 15.00 40.00 2500.00 1.00 25008 Vegetables 80 100.00 200.00 600.00 1.00 6009 Potato 80 100.00 200.00 500.00 1.00 50010 Wheat 10.00 15.00 40.00 1400.00 1.00 1400

11 Sunflower 7.50 8.25 15.00 2500.00 1.00 2500

12 Sugarcane 300.00 400.00 750.00 500.00 1.00 50013 Pulses 10.00 15.00 30.00 1798.00 1.00 179814 Fodder 100.00 200.00 400.00 50.00 0.00 0

Table-20.2(a) Crop Yield (Main Product) and Prices

MP  FinEcoInputVer1.0

Page 204: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Sl. No.

Crop Name

Crop Yield in Present Situation

( Quintal/ha)

Crop Yield Future Without Project

Situation ( Quintal/ha)

Crop Yield in FutureWith Project

Situation( Quintal/ha)

Financial (Unit Price )

Conversion Factor

Economic Unit Price

KHARIF 1 Paddy 35.00 40.00 55.00 50.00 1.00 502 Maize 20.00 22.00 40.00 20.00 1.00 203 Ragi 10.00 11.00 40.00 20.00 1.00 204 Vegetables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 05 Fodder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0

RABI6 Paddy 27.00 30.00 70.00 50.00 1.00 507 Grondnut 8.50 9.35 40.00 70.00 1.00 708 Vegetables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 09 Potato 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0

10 Wheat 10.00 15.00 40.00 70.00 1.00 70

11 Sunflower 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0

12 Sugarcane 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 013 Pulses 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 014 Fodder 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0

Table-20.2(b) Crop Yield (By Product) and Prices

BP FinEcoInputVer1.0

Page 205: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Sl. No.

Crop Name

Technical Coefficient (

KG)

Technical Coefficient Future_Without Project

( Quintal)

Technical Coefficient Future_With Project (

Quintal)

Financial (Unit Price )

Conversion Factor

Economical Unit Price

KHARIF 1 Paddy 30.00 33.00 40.00 8.00 1.00 82 Maize 30.00 33.00 40.00 5.00 1.00 53 Ragi 5.00 5.50 30.00 5.00 1.00 54 Vegetables 100.00 110.00 100.00 25.00 1.00 255 Fodder 7.00 7.70 15.00 12.00 1.00 12

RABI6 Paddy 6.00 6.60 30.00 8.00 1 87 Grondnut 25.00 27.50 40.00 10.00 1.00 108 Vegetables 100.00 110.00 100.00 25.00 1.00 25

9 Potato 20.00 22.00 30.00 12.00 1 1210 Wheat 20.00 22.00 7.00 6.00 1.00 6

11 Sunflower 19.00 20.90 20.00 12.00 1.00 12

12 Sugarcane 10.00 11.00 20.00 8.00 1.00 8

13 Pulses 30.00 33.00 70.00 22.00 1 2214 Fodder 100.00 110.00 100.00 25.00 1.00 25

Table-20.2(c) Seed and Prices

Seeds FinEcoInputVer1.0

Page 206: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Unit:Rs Million

Sr No Annual

Capital Cost O & M Cost Total

Annual Cost

Discounted annual cost @15.31 %

discount rate

Annual Benefit in future with

project situation

Annual Benefit in future

without Project

Net Incremental

Annual Benefit

Discounted annual benefit

@15.31 % discount rate

Annual Cash Flow

annual Cash Flow @15.31 % discount

rate1 1222.8 4.95 1227.75 1227.75 570.96 570.96 0.00 0.00 -1227.75 -1227.752 917.1 8.67 925.77 802.84 570.96 570.96 0.00 0.00 -925.77 -802.843 1528.5 14.86 1543.36 1160.69 570.96 570.96 0.00 0.00 -1543.36 -1160.694 1528.5 21.06 1549.56 1010.60 570.96 570.96 0.00 0.00 -1549.56 -1010.605 917.1 21.06 938.16 530.61 570.96 570.96 0.00 0.00 -938.16 -530.616 0 21.06 21.06 10.33 1003.24 570.96 432.28 212.03 411.22 201.707 0 21.06 21.06 8.96 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 610.60 1414.46 601.648 0 21.06 21.06 7.77 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 529.52 1414.46 521.759 0 21.06 21.06 6.74 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 459.20 1414.46 452.47

10 0 21.06 21.06 5.84 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 398.23 1414.46 392.3911 0 21.06 21.06 5.07 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 345.35 1414.46 340.2812 0 21.06 21.06 4.39 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 299.49 1414.46 295.1013 0 21.06 21.06 3.81 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 259.72 1414.46 255.9114 0 21.06 21.06 3.30 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 225.23 1414.46 221.9315 0 21.06 21.06 2.87 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 195.32 1414.46 192.4616 0 21.06 21.06 2.48 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 169.39 1414.46 166.9017 0 21.06 21.06 2.15 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 146.89 1414.46 144.7418 0 21.06 21.06 1.87 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 127.39 1414.46 125.5219 0 21.06 21.06 1.62 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 110.47 1414.46 108.8520 0 21.06 21.06 1.41 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 95.80 1414.46 94.4021 0 21.06 21.06 1.22 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 83.08 1414.46 81.8622 0 21.06 21.06 1.06 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 72.05 1414.46 70.9923 0 21.06 21.06 0.92 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 62.48 1414.46 61.5624 0 21.06 21.06 0.79 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 54.18 1414.46 53.3925 0 21.06 21.06 0.69 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 46.99 1414.46 46.3026 0 21.06 21.06 0.60 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 40.75 1414.46 40.1527 0 21.06 21.06 0.52 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 35.34 1414.46 34.8228 0 21.06 21.06 0.45 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 30.65 1414.46 30.2029 0 21.06 21.06 0.39 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 26.58 1414.46 26.1930 0 21.06 21.06 0.34 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 23.05 1414.46 22.7131 0 21.06 21.06 0.29 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 19.99 1414.46 19.6932 0 21.06 21.06 0.25 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 17.33 1414.46 17.0833 0 21.06 21.06 0.22 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 15.03 1414.46 14.8134 0 21.06 21.06 0.19 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 13.04 1414.46 12.8435 0 21.06 21.06 0.17 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 11.30 1414.46 11.1436 0 21.06 21.06 0.14 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 9.80 1414.46 9.6637 0 21.06 21.06 0.12 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 8.50 1414.46 8.3838 0 21.06 21.06 0.11 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 7.37 1414.46 7.2639 0 21.06 21.06 0.09 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 6.39 1414.46 6.3040 0 21.06 21.06 0.08 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 5.54 1414.46 5.4641 0 21.06 21.06 0.07 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 4.81 1414.46 4.7442 0 21.06 21.06 0.06 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 4.17 1414.46 4.1143 0 21.06 21.06 0.05 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 3.62 1414.46 3.5644 0 21.06 21.06 0.05 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 3.14 1414.46 3.0945 0 21.06 21.06 0.04 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 2.72 1414.46 2.6846 0 21.06 21.06 0.03 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 2.36 1414.46 2.3247 0 21.06 21.06 0.03 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 2.05 1414.46 2.0248 0 21.06 21.06 0.03 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 1.77 1414.46 1.7549 0 21.06 21.06 0.02 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 1.54 1414.46 1.5250 0 21.06 21.06 0.02 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 1.33 1414.46 1.3151 0 21.06 21.06 0.02 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 1.16 1414.46 1.1452 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 1.00 1414.46 0.9953 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.87 1414.46 0.8654 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.75 1414.46 0.7455 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.65 1414.46 0.6456 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.57 1414.46 0.5657 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.49 1414.46 0.4858 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.43 1414.46 0.4259 0 21.06 21.06 0.01 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.37 1414.46 0.3660 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.32 1414.46 0.3261 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.28 1414.46 0.2762 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.24 1414.46 0.2463 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.21 1414.46 0.2164 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.18 1414.46 0.1865 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.16 1414.46 0.1666 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.14 1414.46 0.1367 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.12 1414.46 0.1268 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.10 1414.46 0.1069 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.09 1414.46 0.0970 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.08 1414.46 0.0871 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.07 1414.46 0.0772 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.06 1414.46 0.0673 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.05 1414.46 0.0574 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.04 1414.46 0.0475 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.04 1414.46 0.0476 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.03 1414.46 0.0377 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.03 1414.46 0.0378 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.02 1414.46 0.0279 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.02 1414.46 0.0280 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.02 1414.46 0.0281 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.02 1414.46 0.0282 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0183 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0184 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0185 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0186 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0187 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0188 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0189 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.01 1414.46 0.0190 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0091 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0092 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0093 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0094 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0095 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0096 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0097 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0098 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.0099 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.00100 0 21.06 21.06 0.00 2006.48 570.96 1435.52 0.00 1414.46 0.00

Taotal 6114 2071.08 8185.08 4810.28 192467.41 57096.05 135371.36 4810.28 127186.28 0.00

15.31% NPV at 10% discount Rate

3534

FINANCIAL INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (FIRR)

Financial Internal Rate of Return =

Table-20.5

Page 207: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Unit:Rs Million

Sr No Annual

Capital Cost O & M Cost Total

Annual Cost

Discounted annual cost @18.86 %

discount rate

Annual Benefit in future with

project situation

Annual Benefit in future without

Project Net Incremental Annual Benefit

Discounted annual benefit

@18.86 % discount rate

Annual Cash Flow

Discounted annual Cash Flow @18.86 % discount

rate1 1039.38 4.21152 1043.59152 1043.59 605.55 605.55 0.00 0.00 -1043.59 -1043.592 779.535 7.37016 786.90516 662.02 605.55 605.55 0.00 0.00 -786.91 -662.023 1299.225 12.63456 1311.85956 928.49 605.55 605.55 0.00 0.00 -1311.86 -928.494 1299.225 17.89896 1317.12396 784.27 605.55 605.55 0.00 0.00 -1317.12 -784.275 779.535 17.89896 797.43396 399.47 1031.37 605.55 425.82 213.31 -371.62 -186.166 0 17.89896 17.89896 7.54 1547.05 605.55 941.50 396.78 923.60 389.247 0 17.89896 17.89896 6.35 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 516.64 1439.28 510.308 0 17.89896 17.89896 5.34 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 434.65 1439.28 429.319 0 17.89896 17.89896 4.49 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 365.66 1439.28 361.17

10 0 17.89896 17.89896 3.78 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 307.63 1439.28 303.8511 0 17.89896 17.89896 3.18 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 258.81 1439.28 255.6312 0 17.89896 17.89896 2.67 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 217.73 1439.28 215.0613 0 17.89896 17.89896 2.25 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 183.18 1439.28 180.9314 0 17.89896 17.89896 1.89 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 154.10 1439.28 152.2115 0 17.89896 17.89896 1.59 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 129.65 1439.28 128.0516 0 17.89896 17.89896 1.34 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 109.07 1439.28 107.7317 0 17.89896 17.89896 1.13 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 91.76 1439.28 90.6318 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.95 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 77.20 1439.28 76.2519 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.80 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 64.94 1439.28 64.1520 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.67 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 54.64 1439.28 53.9721 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.56 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 45.97 1439.28 45.4022 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.48 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 38.67 1439.28 38.2023 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.40 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 32.53 1439.28 32.1324 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.34 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 27.37 1439.28 27.0325 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.28 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 23.03 1439.28 22.7426 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.24 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 19.37 1439.28 19.1327 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.20 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 16.30 1439.28 16.1028 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.17 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 13.71 1439.28 13.5429 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.14 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 11.53 1439.28 11.3930 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.12 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 9.70 1439.28 9.5831 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.10 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 8.16 1439.28 8.0632 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.08 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 6.87 1439.28 6.7833 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.07 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 5.78 1439.28 5.7134 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.06 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 4.86 1439.28 4.8035 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.05 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 4.09 1439.28 4.0436 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.04 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 3.44 1439.28 3.4037 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.04 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 2.89 1439.28 2.8638 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.03 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 2.44 1439.28 2.4139 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.03 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 2.05 1439.28 2.0240 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.02 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 1.72 1439.28 1.7041 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.02 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 1.45 1439.28 1.4342 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 1.22 1439.28 1.2043 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 1.03 1439.28 1.0144 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.86 1439.28 0.8545 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.73 1439.28 0.7246 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.61 1439.28 0.6047 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.51 1439.28 0.5148 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.01 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.43 1439.28 0.4349 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.36 1439.28 0.3650 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.31 1439.28 0.3051 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.26 1439.28 0.2552 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.22 1439.28 0.2153 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.18 1439.28 0.1854 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.15 1439.28 0.1555 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.13 1439.28 0.1356 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.11 1439.28 0.1157 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.09 1439.28 0.0958 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.08 1439.28 0.0859 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.06 1439.28 0.0660 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.05 1439.28 0.0561 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.05 1439.28 0.0562 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.04 1439.28 0.0463 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.03 1439.28 0.0364 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.03 1439.28 0.0365 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.02 1439.28 0.0266 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.02 1439.28 0.0267 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.02 1439.28 0.0268 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0169 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0170 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0171 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0172 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0173 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.01 1439.28 0.0174 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0075 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0076 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0077 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0078 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0079 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0080 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0081 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0082 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0083 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0084 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0085 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0086 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0087 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0088 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0089 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0090 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0091 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0092 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0093 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0094 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0095 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0096 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0097 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0098 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.0099 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.00100 0 17.89896 17.89896 0.00 2062.73 605.55 1457.18 0.00 1439.28 0.00

Total 5196.9 1760.41536 6957.31536 3865.36 2063 606 138342.47 3865.36 131385.16 0.00

18.9%NPV at 10% discount Rate

4930

Table-20.6ECONOMIC INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (EIRR)

Financial Internal Rate of Return =

Page 208: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Projection

Commodity Unit 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015

Maize $/mt 103.70 125.80 92.00 103.00 113.00 104.00 94.00 92.00

Rice $/mt 199.10 211.40 267.00 281.00 288.00 269.00 232.00 216.00

Cotton* $/mt 1037.00 1110.00 1140.00 1130.00 1120.00 1150.00 1200.00 1210.00

Wheat $/mt 157.10 181.20 142.00 177.00 192.00 178.00 137.00 133.00

Sorghum $/mt 105.80 125.80 90.00 103.00 113.00 104.00 94.00 92.00

Soyabean $/mt 217.70 231.60 257.00 238.00 244.00 243.00 232.00 221.00

Tobacco $/mt 2872.00 3020.00 2606.00 2481.00 2383.00 2367.00 2358.00 2330.00

DAP $/mt 163.80 169.10 231.00 237.00 222.00 208.00 189.00 166.00

MOP $/mt 117.20 120.80 148.00 158.00 140.00 135.00 129.00 108.00

TSP $/mt 137.90 140.90 188.00 260.00 174.00 172.00 159.00 137.00

Urea $/mt 96.40 109.40 205.00 197.00 188.00 184.00 172.00 154.00

* Converted to $/mt

Actual

Table-20.7 Commodity Prices And Price Projections In US DollarsIn Constant 1990 US Dollars

Page 209: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Quality Adjustment QA 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%

Processing Ratio PR 100% 100% 67% 40% 100% 100% 100%

Unit Wheat Maize Rice Cotton Sorghum Soyabean Tobacco

US$/mt 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015

World Market F.O.B. Price WP 177.00 192.00 178.00 137.00 133.00 103.00 113.00 104.00 94.00 92.00 281.00 288.00 269.00 232.00 216.00 1130.00 1120.00 1150.00 1200.00 1210.00 103.00 113.00 104.00 94.00 92.00 238.00 244.00 243.00 232.00 221.00 2481.00 2383.00 2367.00 2358.00 2330.00

World Market Equivalent EP=WP*QA 159.30 172.80 160.20 123.30 119.70 92.70 101.70 93.60 84.60 82.80 252.90 259.20 242.10 208.80 194.40 1017.00 1008.00 1035.00 1080.00 1089.00 92.70 101.70 93.60 84.60 82.80 214.20 219.60 218.70 208.80 198.90 2232.90 2144.70 2130.30 2122.20 2097.00

International Shiping Cost S 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00

International cif Price I=S+EP 184.30 197.80 185.20 148.30 144.70 117.70 126.70 118.60 109.60 107.80 277.90 284.20 267.10 233.80 219.40 1042.00 1033.00 1060.00 1105.00 1114.00 117.70 126.70 118.60 109.60 107.80 239.20 244.60 243.70 233.80 223.90 2257.90 2169.70 2155.30 2147.20 2122.00

Rs./mt

International cif Price in Equivalent Rs. II=I*$40.40 7445.72 7991.12 7482.08 5991.32 5845.88 4755.08 5118.68 4791.44 4427.84 4355.12 11227.16 11481.68 10790.84 9445.52 8863.76 42096.80 41733.20 42824.00 44642.00 45005.60 4755.08 5118.68 4791.44 4427.84 4355.12 9663.68 9881.84 9845.48 9445.52 9045.56 91219.16 87655.88 87074.12 86746.88 85728.80

Taxes T 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Port Charges B 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00

Domestic Handling/Transport HT 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00 556.00

Wholesale Prices(Process Product) PP=II-T+B+H 8251.72 8797.12 8288.08 6797.32 6651.88 5561.08 5924.68 5597.44 5233.84 5161.12 12033.16 12287.68 11596.84 10251.52 9669.76 42902.80 42539.20 43630.00 45448.00 45811.60 5561.08 5924.68 5597.44 5233.84 5161.12 10469.68 10687.84 10651.48 10251.52 9851.56 92025.16 88461.88 87880.12 87552.88 86534.80

Wholesale Prices(Raw Product) RPP=PR*PP 8251.72 8797.12 8288.08 6797.32 6651.88 5561.08 5924.68 5597.44 5233.84 5161.12 8062.22 8232.75 7769.88 6868.52 6478.74 17161.12 17015.68 17452.00 18179.20 18324.64 5561.08 5924.68 5597.44 5233.84 5161.12 10469.68 10687.84 10651.48 10251.52 9851.56 92025.16 88461.88 87880.12 87552.88 86534.80

Transport from Factory to Port TC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Processing Cost PC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Transport from Farmgate to Factory(port) TF 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00

Value of By-Products BPV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

% Out of Total Raw Products N 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 67% 67% 67% 67% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 40.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Farmgate Price(Rs./mt) FGP=(RPP-TC-PC-T 7651.72 8197.12 7688.08 6197.32 6051.88 4961.08 5324.68 4997.44 4633.84 4561.12 4999.69 5113.94 4803.82 4199.91 3938.76 6624.45 6566.27 6740.80 7031.68 7089.86 4961.08 5324.68 4997.44 4633.84 4561.12 9869.68 10087.84 10051.48 9651.52 9251.56 91425.16 87861.88 87280.12 86952.88 85934.80

Farmgate Price(Rs./Q) FGP=(RPP-TC-PC-TF- 765.17 819.71 768.81 619.73 605.19 496.11 532.47 499.74 463.38 456.11 499.97 511.39 480.38 419.99 393.88 662.44 656.63 674.08 703.17 708.99 496.11 532.47 499.74 463.38 456.11 986.97 1008.78 1005.15 965.15 925.16 9142.52 8786.19 8728.01 8695.29 8593.48

US1$=Rs.40.40

40.40

Table-8.8 Economic Price Projections For Internationally Traded Crops (Import Substitution)

Page 210: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Quality Adjustment QA90% 90% 100% 100%

Processing Ratio PR42% 46% 60% 60%

UnitUREA DAP TSP MOP

US$/mt2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015 2006 2007 2008 2010 2015

World Market Price (US$) WP197.00 188.00 184.00 172.00 154.00 237.00 222.00 208.00 189.00 166.00 260.00 174.00 172.00 159.00 137.00 158.00 140.00 135.00 129.00 108.00

World Market Equivalent EP=WP*QA 177.30 169.20 165.60 154.80 138.60 213.30 199.80 187.20 170.10 149.40 260.00 174.00 172.00 159.00 137.00 158.00 140.00 135.00 129.00 108.00

International Shiping Cost S 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00

International FOB Price I=S+EP 217.30 209.20 205.60 194.80 178.60 253.30 239.80 227.20 210.10 189.40 300.00 214.00 212.00 199.00 177.00 198.00 180.00 175.00 169.00 148.00

Rs./mt

International FOB Price in Equivalent Rs. II=I*$A$258778.92 8451.68 8306.24 7869.92 7215.44 10233.32 9687.92 9178.88 8488.04 7651.76 12120.00 8645.60 8564.80 8039.60 7150.80 7999.20 7272.00 7070.00 6827.60 5979.20

Taxes(+) or Subsidies(-) T 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Domestic Handling /Transport HT 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00 600.00

Wholesale Prices (Process Product)PP=II+T+HT 9378.92 9051.68 8906.24 8469.92 7815.44 10833.32 10287.92 9778.88 9088.04 8251.76 12720.00 9245.60 9164.80 8639.60 7750.80 8599.20 7872.00 7670.00 7427.60 6579.20

Transport to Farmgate TF 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00

Farmgate Price Rs./mt

RFGP=PP+TF 9728.92 9401.68 9256.24 8819.92 8165.44 11183.32 10637.92 10128.88 9438.04 8601.76 13070.00 9595.60 9514.80 8989.60 8100.80 8949.20 8222.00 8020.00 7777.60 6929.20

Farmgate Price Rs./Q RFGP 972.89 940.17 925.62 881.99 816.54 1118.33 1063.79 1012.89 943.80 860.18 1307.00 959.56 951.48 898.96 810.08 894.92 822.20 802.00 777.76 692.92

Farmgate Price Rs./Kg RFGP 9.73 9.40 9.26 8.82 8.17 11.18 10.64 10.13 9.44 8.60 13.07 9.60 9.51 8.99 8.10 8.95 8.22 8.02 7.78 6.93

Farmgate Price of Nutrient Component FGP=RFGP/PR 23164.10 22384.95 22038.67 20999.81 19441.52 26626.95 25328.38 24116.38 22471.52 20480.38 31119.05 22846.67 22654.29 21403.81 19287.62 21307.62 19576.19 19095.24 18518.10 16498.10

Farmgate Price of Nutrient Component Rs./Q (FGP=RFGP/PR)/10 2316.41 2238.50 2203.87 2099.98 1944.15 2662.70 2532.84 2411.64 2247.15 2048.04 3111.90 2284.67 2265.43 2140.38 1928.76 2130.76 1957.62 1909.52 1851.81 1649.81

Farmgate Price of Nutrient Component Rs./kg (FGP=RFGP/PR)/100 23.16 22.38 22.04 21.00 19.44 26.63 25.33 24.12 22.47 20.48 31.12 22.85 22.65 21.40 19.29 21.31 19.58 19.10 18.52 16.50US1$=Rs.40.4040.40

Table-20.9 Economic Price Projection for Internationally Traded Inputs

Page 211: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 25.00 1389.80 34745 30.00 1389.80 41694 55.00 1389.80 76439b) By Product 35.00 50.00 1750 40.00 50.00 2000 40.00 50.00 2000Total 36495 43694 78439Input KGSeeds 30.00 8.00 240.00 33.00 8.00 264.00 40.00 8.00 320.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 120.00 6.00 720.00 132.00 6.00 792.00 130.00 6.00 780.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 42.00 12.00 504.00 46.20 12.00 554.40 50.00 12.00 600.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 12.00 6.00 72.00 13.20 6.00 79.20 20.00 6.00 120.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 10.00 50.00 500.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 55.00 100.00 5500.00 60.50 100.00 6050.00 65.00 100.00 6500.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal25.00 20.00 500.00 27.50 20.00 550.00 65.00 20.00 1300.00

Sub-Total 9746.00 10720.60 10530.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 484.30 532.73 523.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 651.00 716.10 1450.74

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 292.38 321.62 315.90

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 11173.68 12291.05 12820.14Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

11173.68 12291.05 12820.14

Net Return Rs. /Ha 25321.32 31402.95 65618.86

Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

25321.32 31402.95 65618.86

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 446.95 409.70 233.09Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 446.95 409.70 233.09

Net Return / Quintal 1012.85 1046.76 1193.07Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1012.85 1046.76 1193.07

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Average/Qtl Average/Qtl Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 1of 14 )

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Paddy

Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Present Situation

Page 212: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 20.00 920.50 18410 22.00 920.50 20251 45.00 920.50 41423b) By Product 20.00 20.00 400 22.00 20.00 440 40.00 20.00 800Total 18810 20691 42223Input KGSeeds 30.00 5.00 150.00 33.00 5.00 165.00 40.00 5.00 200.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 35.00 6.00 210.00 38.50 6.00 231.00 62.00 6.00 372.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 15.00 12.00 180.00 16.50 12.00 198.00 18.00 12.00 216.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 50.00 6.00 300.00 55.00 6.00 330.00 60.00 6.00 360.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 12.00 50.00 600.00 13.20 50.00 660.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 20.00 100.00 2000.00 22.00 100.00 2200.00 30.00 100.00 3000.00Animal Power BPD 5.00 100.00 500.00 5.50 100.00 550.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal31.50 20.00 630.00 34.65 20.00 693.00 65.00 20.00 1300.00

Sub-Total 4780.00 5258.00 6158.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 236.00 259.60 304.90

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 697.23 766.96 1378.87

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 143.40 157.74 184.74

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 5856.63 6442.30 8026.51Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

5856.63 6442.30 8026.51

Net Return Rs. /Ha 12953.37 14248.70 34195.99Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

12953.37 14248.70 34195.99

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 292.83 292.83 178.37Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 292.83 292.83 178.37

Net Return / Quintal 647.67 647.67 759.91Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 647.67 647.67 759.91

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20Sub-total

Annexure-20.1 ( 2of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Maize

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 213: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1005.50 10055 15.00 1005.50 15083 35.00 1005.50 35193b) By Product 10.00 20.00 200 11.00 20.00 220 0.00 20.00 0Total 10255 15303 35193Input KGSeeds 5.00 5.00 25.00 5.50 5.00 27.50 30.00 5.00 150.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 8.00 6.00 48.00 8.80 6.00 52.80 35.00 6.00 210.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 5.00 12.00 60.00 5.50 12.00 66.00 15.00 12.00 180.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 10.00 6.00 60.00 11.00 6.00 66.00 40.00 6.00 240.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 8.00 100.00 800.00 8.80 100.00 880.00 25.00 100.00 2500.00Animal Power BPD 1.00 100.00 100.00 1.10 100.00 110.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal10.00 20.00 200.00 11.00 20.00 220.00 45.00 20.00 900.00

Sub-Total 1603.00 1763.30 4890.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 77.15 84.87 241.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 222.08 244.28 964.60

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 48.09 52.90 146.70

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 1950.32 2145.35 6242.80Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

1950.32 2145.35 6242.80

Net Return Rs. /Ha 8304.68 13157.15 28949.70Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

8304.68 13157.15 28949.70

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 195.03 143.02 178.37Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 195.03 143.02 178.37

Net Return / Quintal 830.47 877.14 827.13Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 830.47 877.14 827.13

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 3of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Ragi

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 214: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 600.00 48000 150.00 600.00 90000 200.00 600.00 120000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 48000 90000 120000Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 6.00 450.00 82.50 6.00 495.00 90.00 6.00 540.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 12.00 600.00 55.00 12.00 660.00 40.00 12.00 480.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 6.00 840.00 154.00 6.00 924.00 170.00 6.00 1020.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 100.00 8000.00 88.00 100.00 8800.00 100.00 100.00 10000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 16170.00 17787.00 21000.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 805.50 886.05 1047.00

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1563.12 1719.44 5262.03

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 485.10 533.61 630.00

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 19023.72 20926.10 27939.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

19023.72 20926.10 27939.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha 28976.28 69073.90 92060.97Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

28976.28 69073.90 92060.97

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 237.80 139.51 139.70Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 237.80 139.51 139.70

Net Return / Quintal 362.20 460.49 460.30Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 362.20 460.49 460.30

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 4 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Vegetables

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 215: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical

CoefficientUnit Price Value

Technical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical

CoefficientUnit Price Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 100.00 60.00 6000 200.00 60.00 12000 400.00 60.00 24000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 6000 12000 24000Input KGSeeds 7.00 12.00 84.00 7.70 12.00 92.40 15.00 12.00 180.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 30.00 6.00 180.00 33.00 6.00 198.00 45.00 6.00 270.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 8.00 12.00 96.00 8.80 12.00 105.60 10.00 12.00 120.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 30.00 6.00 180.00 33.00 6.00 198.00 40.00 6.00 240.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 4.00 50.00 200.00 4.40 50.00 220.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 20.00 100.00 2000.00 22.00 100.00 2200.00 35.00 100.00 3500.00Animal Power BPD 5.00 100.00 500.00 5.50 100.00 550.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal9.71 20.00 194.20 10.68 20.00 213.62 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 3644.20 4008.62 5770.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 179.21 197.13 285.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. & Contingencies.

Rs. /Ha 249.93 274.92 880.71

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 109.33 120.26 173.10

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4182.66 4600.93 7109.31Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charges

4182.66 4600.93 7109.31

Net Return Rs. /Ha 1817.34 7399.07 16890.69Net Return Excluding IrrigationCharges

1817.34 7399.07 16890.69

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 41.83 23.00 17.77Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha

41.83 23.00 17.77

Net Return / Quintal 18.17 37.00 42.23Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 18.17 37.00 42.23

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl

Labour in harvest (Manday/Ha) 20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20Sub-total

Annexure-20.1 ( 5 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Fodder

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 216: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 25.00 1389.80 34745 30.00 1389.80 41694 55.00 1389.80 76439b) By Product 27.00 50.00 1350 30.00 50.00 1500 40.00 50.00 2000Total 36095 43194 78439Input KGSeeds 6.00 8.00 48.00 6.60 8.00 52.80 30.00 8.00 240.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 15.00 6.00 90.00 16.50 6.00 99.00 50.00 6.00 300.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 8.00 12.00 96.00 8.80 12.00 105.60 12.00 12.00 144.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 12.00 6.00 72.00 13.20 6.00 79.20 40.00 6.00 240.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 10.00 100.00 1000.00 11.00 100.00 1100.00 40.00 100.00 4000.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal6.50 20.00 130.00 7.15 20.00 143.00 32.41 20.00 648.20

Sub-Total 1946.00 2140.60 6232.20Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 94.30 103.73 308.61

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 158.87 174.75 739.01

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 58.38 64.22 186.97

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 2257.55 2483.30 7466.78Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

2257.55 2483.30 7466.78

Net Return Rs. /Ha 33837.45 40710.70 70972.22Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

33837.45 40710.70 70972.22

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 90.30 82.78 135.76Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 90.30 82.78 135.76

Net Return / Quintal 1353.50 1357.02 1290.40Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1353.50 1357.02 1290.40

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20Sub-total

Annexure-20.1 ( 6 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Paddy

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 217: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 8.50 2500.00 21250 15.00 2500.00 37500 40.00 2500.00 100000b) By Product 8.50 70.00 595 9.35 70.00 655 0.00 70.00 0Total 21845 38155 100000Input KGSeeds 25.00 10.00 250.00 27.50 10.00 275.00 40.00 10.00 400.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 40.00 6.00 240.00 44.00 6.00 264.00 60.00 6.00 360.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 12.00 12.00 144.00 13.20 12.00 158.40 20.00 12.00 240.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 52.00 6.00 312.00 57.20 6.00 343.20 70.00 6.00 420.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 5.00 50.00 250.00 5.50 50.00 275.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 30.00 100.00 3000.00 33.00 100.00 3300.00 45.00 100.00 4500.00Animal Power BPD 3.00 100.00 300.00 3.30 100.00 330.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal8.50 20.00 170.00 9.35 20.00 187.00 50.00 20.00 1000.00

Sub-Total 4876.00 5363.60 7730.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 240.80 264.88 383.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 246.37 271.01 1109.64

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 146.28 160.91 231.90

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 5509.45 6060.40 9455.04Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

5509.45 6060.40 9455.04

Net Return Rs. /Ha 16335.55 32094.10 90544.96Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

16335.55 32094.10 90544.96

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 648.17 404.03 236.38Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 648.17 404.03 236.38

Net Return / Quintal 1921.83 2139.61 2263.62Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1921.83 2139.61 2263.62

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 7 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Grondnut

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 218: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 600.00 48000 100.00 600.00 60000 200.00 600.00 120000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 48000 60000 120000Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 6.00 450.00 82.50 6.00 495.00 90.00 6.00 540.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 12.00 600.00 55.00 12.00 660.00 40.00 12.00 480.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 6.00 840.00 154.00 6.00 924.00 170.00 6.00 1020.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 100.00 8000.00 88.00 100.00 8800.00 100.00 100.00 10000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 16170.00 17787.00 21000.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 805.50 886.05 1047.00

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1563.12 1719.44 5262.03

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 485.10 533.61 630.00

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 19023.72 20926.10 27939.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

19023.72 20926.10 27939.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha 28976.28 39073.90 92060.97Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

28976.28 39073.90 92060.97

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 237.80 209.26 139.70Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 237.80 209.26 139.70

Net Return / Quintal 362.20 390.74 460.30Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 362.20 390.74 460.30

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 8 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Vegetables

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 219: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 500.00 40000 100.00 500.00 50000 200.00 500.00 100000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 40000 50000 100000Input KGSeeds 20.00 12.00 240.00 22.00 12.00 264.00 30.00 12.00 360.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 10.00 6.00 60.00 11.00 6.00 66.00 25.00 6.00 150.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 2.00 12.00 24.00 2.20 12.00 26.40 10.00 12.00 120.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 1.00 6.00 6.00 1.10 6.00 6.60 10.00 6.00 60.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 10.00 50.00 500.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 30.00 100.00 3000.00 33.00 100.00 3300.00 30.00 100.00 3000.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal7.00 20.00 140.00 7.70 20.00 154.00 60.00 20.00 1200.00

Sub-Total 4380.00 4818.00 6100.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 216.00 237.60 302.00

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 208.71 229.58 1279.56

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 131.40 144.54 183.00

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4936.11 5429.72 7864.56Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

4936.11 5429.72 7864.56

Net Return Rs. /Ha 35063.89 44570.28 92135.44Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

35063.89 44570.28 92135.44

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 61.70 54.30 39.32Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 61.70 54.30 39.32

Net Return / Quintal 438.30 445.70 460.68Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 438.30 445.70 460.68

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 9 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Potato

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 220: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1400.00 14000 15.00 1400.00 21000 40.00 1400.00 56000b) By Product 10.00 70.00 700 15.00 70.00 1050 0.00 70.00 0Total 14700 22050 56000Input KGSeeds 20.00 6.00 120.00 22.00 6.00 132.00 7.00 6.00 42.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 42.00 6.00 252.00 46.20 6.00 277.20 15.00 6.00 90.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 25.00 12.00 300.00 27.50 12.00 330.00 4.00 12.00 48.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 20.00 6.00 120.00 22.00 6.00 132.00 3.00 6.00 18.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 6.00 50.00 300.00 6.60 50.00 330.00 8.00 50.00 400.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 25.00 100.00 2500.00 27.50 100.00 2750.00 25.00 100.00 2500.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal6.60 20.00 132.00 7.26 20.00 145.20 25.00 20.00 500.00

Sub-Total 4134.00 4547.40 4108.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 203.70 224.07 202.40

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 196.80 216.48 558.32

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 124.02 136.42 123.24

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4658.52 5124.37 4991.96Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

4658.52 5124.37 4991.96

Net Return Rs. /Ha 10041.48 16925.63 51008.04Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

10041.48 16925.63 51008.04

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 465.85 341.62 124.80Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 465.85 341.62 124.80

Net Return / Quintal 1004.15 1128.38 1275.20Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1004.15 1128.38 1275.20

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 10 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Wheat

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 221: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 7.50 2500.00 18750 8.25 2500.00 20625 15.00 2500.00 37500b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 18750 20625 37500Input KGSeeds 19.00 12.00 228.00 20.90 12.00 250.80 20.00 12.00 240.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 30.00 6.00 180.00 33.00 6.00 198.00 20.00 6.00 120.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 10.00 12.00 120.00 11.00 12.00 132.00 5.00 12.00 60.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 33.00 6.00 198.00 36.30 6.00 217.80 5.00 6.00 30.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 13.00 100.00 1300.00 14.30 100.00 1430.00 25.00 100.00 2500.00Animal Power BPD 1.00 100.00 100.00 1.10 100.00 110.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal7.50 20.00 150.00 8.25 20.00 165.00 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 2586.00 2844.60 4510.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 126.30 138.93 222.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 189.06 207.96 860.00

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 77.58 85.34 135.30

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 2978.94 3276.83 5727.80Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

2978.94 3276.83 5727.80

Net Return Rs. /Ha 15771.06 17348.17 31772.20Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

15771.06 17348.17 31772.20

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 397.19 397.19 381.85Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 397.19 397.19 381.85

Net Return / Quintal 2102.81 2102.81 2118.15Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 2102.81 2102.81 2118.15

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 11 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Sunflower

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 222: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 300.00 500.00 150000 400.00 500.00 200000 750.00 500.00 375000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 150000 200000 375000Input KGSeeds 10.00 8.00 80.00 11.00 8.00 88.00 20.00 8.00 160.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 8.00 6.00 48.00 8.80 6.00 52.80 20.00 6.00 120.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 7.00 12.00 84.00 7.70 12.00 92.40 5.00 12.00 60.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 15.00 6.00 90.00 16.50 6.00 99.00 5.00 6.00 30.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 10.00 100.00 1000.00 11.00 100.00 1100.00 25.00 100.00 2500.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal72.00 20.00 1440.00 79.20 20.00 1584.00 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 3202.00 3522.20 4430.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 157.10 172.81 218.50

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1467.98 1614.78 858.68

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 96.06 105.67 132.90

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4923.14 5415.45 5640.08Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

4923.14 5415.45 5640.08

Net Return Rs. /Ha 145076.86 194584.55 369359.92Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

145076.86 194584.55 369359.92

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 16.41 13.54 7.52Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 16.41 13.54 7.52

Net Return / Quintal 483.59 486.46 492.48Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 483.59 486.46 492.48

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 12 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Sugarcane

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 223: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1798.00 17980 15.00 1798.00 26970 30.00 1798.00 53940b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 17980 26970 53940Input KGSeeds 30.00 22.00 660.00 33.00 22.00 726.00 70.00 22.00 1540.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 55.00 6.00 330.00 60.50 6.00 363.00 120.00 6.00 720.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 20.00 12.00 240.00 22.00 12.00 264.00 40.00 12.00 480.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 65.00 6.00 390.00 71.50 6.00 429.00 140.00 6.00 840.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 6.00 50.00 300.00 6.60 50.00 330.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 40.00 100.00 4000.00 44.00 100.00 4400.00 90.00 100.00 9000.00Animal Power BPD 8.00 100.00 800.00 8.80 100.00 880.00 20.00 100.00 2000.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal25.00 20.00 500.00 27.50 20.00 550.00 66.05 20.00 1321.00

Sub-Total 7430.00 8173.00 16861.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 368.50 405.35 840.05

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 612.93 674.22 1575.47

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 222.90 245.19 505.83

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 8634.33 9497.76 19782.35Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

8634.33 9497.76 19782.35

Net Return Rs. /Ha 9345.67 17472.24 34157.65Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

9345.67 17472.24 34157.65

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 863.43 633.18 659.41Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 863.43 633.18 659.41

Net Return / Quintal 934.57 1164.82 1138.59Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 934.57 1164.82 1138.59

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 13 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Pulses

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 224: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 100.00 50.00 5000 200.00 50.00 10000 400.00 50.00 20000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 5000 10000 20000Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 6.00 450.00 82.50 6.00 495.00 90.00 6.00 540.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 12.00 600.00 55.00 12.00 660.00 40.00 12.00 480.00Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 6.00 840.00 154.00 6.00 924.00 170.00 6.00 1020.00Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 100.00 8000.00 88.00 100.00 8800.00 100.00 100.00 10000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 16170.00 17787.00 21000.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 805.50 886.05 1047.00

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1563.12 1719.44 5262.03

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 485.10 533.61 630.00

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 19023.72 20926.10 27939.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

19023.72 20926.10 27939.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha -14023.72 -10926.10 -7939.03Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

-14023.72 -10926.10 -7939.03

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 190.24 104.63 69.85Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 190.24 104.63 69.85

Net Return / Quintal -140.24 -54.63 -19.85Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges -140.24 -54.63 -19.85

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.1 ( 14 of 14 )

FIANANCIAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Fodder

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 225: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 25.00 1389.80 34745 30.00 1389.80 41694 55.00 1389.80 76439b) By Product 35.00 50.00 1750 40.00 50.00 2000 40.00 50.00 2000Total 36495 43694 78439Input KGSeeds 30.00 8.00 240.00 33.00 8.00 264.00 40.00 8.00 320.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 120.00 9.26 1111.20 132.00 9.26 1222.32 130.00 9.26 1203.80Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 42.00 10.13 425.46 46.20 10.13 468.01 50.00 10.13 506.50Potasium Fertiliser(K) 12.00 8.02 96.24 13.20 8.02 105.86 20.00 8.02 160.40Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 10.00 50.00 500.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 55.00 50.00 2750.00 60.50 50.00 3025.00 65.00 50.00 3250.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal25.00 20.00 500.00 27.50 20.00 550.00 65.00 20.00 1300.00

Sub-Total 7332.90 8066.19 7650.70Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 363.65 400.01 379.54

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 611.34 672.47 1403.41

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 219.99 241.99 229.52

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 8527.87 9380.65 9663.16Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

8527.87 9380.65 9663.16

Net Return Rs. /Ha 27967.13 34313.35 68775.84Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

27967.13 34313.35 68775.84

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 341.11 312.69 175.69Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 341.11 312.69 175.69

Net Return / Quintal 1118.69 1143.78 1250.47Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1118.69 1143.78 1250.47

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Average/Qtl Average/Qtl Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20Sub-totalTotal related to Output

Annexure-20.2 ( 1of 14 )

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Paddy

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 226: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 20.00 920.50 18410 22.00 920.50 20251 45.00 920.50 41423b) By Product 20.00 20.00 400 22.00 20.00 440 40.00 20.00 800Total 18810 20691 42223Input KGSeeds 30.00 5.00 150.00 33.00 5.00 165.00 40.00 5.00 200.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 35.00 9.26 324.10 38.50 9.26 356.51 62.00 9.26 574.12Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 15.00 10.13 151.95 16.50 10.13 167.15 18.00 10.13 182.34Potasium Fertiliser(K) 50.00 8.02 401.00 55.00 8.02 441.10 60.00 8.02 481.20Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 12.00 50.00 600.00 13.20 50.00 660.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 20.00 50.00 1000.00 22.00 50.00 1100.00 30.00 50.00 1500.00Animal Power BPD 5.00 100.00 500.00 5.50 100.00 550.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal31.50 20.00 630.00 34.65 20.00 693.00 65.00 20.00 1300.00

Sub-Total 3967.05 4363.76 4947.66Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 195.35 214.89 244.38

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 683.87 752.26 1358.98

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 119.01 130.91 148.43

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4965.28 5461.81 6699.45Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

4965.28 5461.81 6699.45

Net Return Rs. /Ha 13844.72 15229.19 35523.05Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

13844.72 15229.19 35523.05

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 248.26 248.26 148.88Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 248.26 248.26 148.88

Net Return / Quintal 692.24 692.24 789.40Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 692.24 692.24 789.40

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20Sub-total

Annexure-20.2 ( 2of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Maize

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 227: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1005.50 10055 15.00 1005.50 15083 35.00 1005.50 35193b) By Product 10.00 20.00 200 11.00 20.00 220 0.00 20.00 0Total 10255 15303 35193Input KGSeeds 5.00 5.00 25.00 5.50 5.00 27.50 30.00 5.00 150.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 8.00 9.26 74.08 8.80 9.26 81.49 35.00 9.26 324.10Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 5.00 10.13 50.65 5.50 10.13 55.72 15.00 10.13 151.95Potasium Fertiliser(K) 10.00 8.02 80.20 11.00 8.02 88.22 40.00 8.02 320.80Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 8.00 50.00 400.00 8.80 50.00 440.00 25.00 50.00 1250.00Animal Power BPD 1.00 100.00 100.00 1.10 100.00 110.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal10.00 20.00 200.00 11.00 20.00 220.00 45.00 20.00 900.00

Sub-Total 1239.93 1363.92 3806.85Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 59.00 64.90 187.34

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 216.11 237.72 946.80

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 37.20 40.92 114.21

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 1552.23 1707.46 5055.20Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

1552.23 1707.46 5055.20

Net Return Rs. /Ha 8702.77 13595.04 30137.30Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

8702.77 13595.04 30137.30

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 155.22 113.83 144.43Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 155.22 113.83 144.43

Net Return / Quintal 870.28 906.34 861.07Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 870.28 906.34 861.07

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 3of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Ragi

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 228: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 600.00 48000 150.00 600.00 90000 200.00 600.00 120000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 48000 90000 120000Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 9.26 694.50 82.50 9.26 763.95 90.00 9.26 833.40Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 10.13 506.50 55.00 10.13 557.15 40.00 10.13 405.20Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 8.02 1122.80 154.00 8.02 1235.08 170.00 8.02 1363.40Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 50.00 4000.00 88.00 50.00 4400.00 100.00 50.00 5000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 12603.80 13864.18 16562.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 627.19 689.91 825.10

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1504.50 1654.95 5189.07

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 378.11 415.93 496.86

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 15113.60 16624.97 23073.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

15113.60 16624.97 23073.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha 32886.40 73375.03 96926.97Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

32886.40 73375.03 96926.97

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 188.92 110.83 115.37Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 188.92 110.83 115.37

Net Return / Quintal 411.08 489.17 484.63Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 411.08 489.17 484.63

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 4 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

tumeric

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 229: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 100.00 0.00 0 200.00 0.00 0 400.00 0.00 0b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 0 0 0Input KGSeeds 7.00 12.00 84.00 7.70 12.00 92.40 15.00 12.00 180.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 30.00 9.26 277.80 33.00 9.26 305.58 45.00 9.26 416.70Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 8.00 10.13 81.04 8.80 10.13 89.14 10.00 10.13 101.30Potasium Fertiliser(K) 30.00 8.02 240.60 33.00 8.02 264.66 40.00 8.02 320.80Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 4.00 50.00 200.00 4.40 50.00 220.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 20.00 50.00 1000.00 22.00 50.00 1100.00 35.00 50.00 1750.00Animal Power BPD 5.00 100.00 500.00 5.50 100.00 550.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal9.71 20.00 194.20 10.68 20.00 213.62 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 2787.64 3066.40 4228.80Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 136.38 150.02 208.44

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 235.85 259.43 855.38

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 83.63 91.99 126.86

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 3243.50 3567.85 5419.48Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

3243.50 3567.85 5419.48

Net Return Rs. /Ha -3243.50 -3567.85 -5419.48Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

-3243.50 -3567.85 -5419.48

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 32.43 17.84 13.55Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 32.43 17.84 13.55

Net Return / Quintal -32.43 -17.84 -13.55Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges -32.43 -17.84 -13.55

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 5 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Fodder

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 230: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 25.00 1389.80 34745 30.00 1389.80 41694 55.00 1389.80 76439b) By Product 27.00 50.00 1350 30.00 50.00 1500 40.00 50.00 2000Total 36095 43194 78439Input KGSeeds 6.00 8.00 48.00 6.60 8.00 52.80 30.00 8.00 240.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 15.00 9.26 138.90 16.50 9.26 152.79 50.00 9.26 463.00Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 8.00 10.13 81.04 8.80 10.13 89.14 12.00 10.13 121.56Potasium Fertiliser(K) 12.00 8.02 96.24 13.20 8.02 105.86 40.00 8.02 320.80Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 40.00 50.00 2000.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 2.00 100.00 200.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal6.50 20.00 130.00 7.15 20.00 143.00 32.41 20.00 648.20

Sub-Total 1504.18 1654.60 4453.56Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 72.21 79.43 219.68

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 151.60 166.76 709.77

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 45.13 49.64 133.61

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 1773.12 1950.43 5516.61Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

1773.12 1950.43 5516.61

Net Return Rs. /Ha 34321.88 41243.57 72922.39Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

34321.88 41243.57 72922.39

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 70.92 65.01 100.30Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 70.92 65.01 100.30

Net Return / Quintal 1372.88 1374.79 1325.86Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1372.88 1374.79 1325.86

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 6 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Paddy

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 231: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1 4

Output /Input item UnitTechnical

CoefficientUnit Price Value

Technical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical

CoefficientUnit Price Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 8.50 2500.00 21250 15.00 2500.00 37500 40.00 2500.00 100000b) By Product 8.50 70.00 595 9.35 70.00 655 0.00 70.00 0Total 21845 38155 100000Input KGSeeds 25.00 10.00 250.00 27.50 10.00 275.00 40.00 10.00 400.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 40.00 9.26 370.40 44.00 9.26 407.44 60.00 9.26 555.60Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 12.00 10.13 121.56 13.20 10.13 133.72 20.00 10.13 202.60Potasium Fertiliser(K) 52.00 8.02 417.04 57.20 8.02 458.74 70.00 8.02 561.40Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 5.00 50.00 250.00 5.50 50.00 275.00 6.00 50.00 300.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 30.00 50.00 1500.00 33.00 50.00 1650.00 45.00 50.00 2250.00Animal Power BPD 3.00 100.00 300.00 3.30 100.00 330.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal8.50 20.00 170.00 9.35 20.00 187.00 50.00 20.00 1000.00

Sub-Total 3589.00 3947.90 5779.60Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 176.45 194.10 285.98

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. & Contingencies.

Rs. /Ha 225.22 247.74 1077.58

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 107.67 118.44 173.39

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4098.34 4508.17 7316.55Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charges

4098.34 4508.17 7316.55

Net Return Rs. /Ha 17746.66 33646.33 92683.45Net Return Excluding IrrigationCharges

17746.66 33646.33 92683.45

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 482.16 300.54 182.91Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha

482.16 300.54 182.91

Net Return / Quintal 2087.84 2243.09 2317.09Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 2087.84 2243.09 2317.09

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl

Labour in harvest (Manday/Ha) 20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 7 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Grondnut

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 232: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 600.00 48000 100.00 600.00 60000 200.00 600.00 120000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 48000 60000 120000Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 9.26 694.50 82.50 9.26 763.95 90.00 9.26 833.40Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 10.13 506.50 55.00 10.13 557.15 40.00 10.13 405.20Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 8.02 1122.80 154.00 8.02 1235.08 170.00 8.02 1363.40Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 50.00 4000.00 88.00 50.00 4400.00 100.00 50.00 5000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 12603.80 13864.18 16562.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 627.19 689.91 825.10

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1504.50 1654.95 5189.07

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 378.11 415.93 496.86

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 15113.60 16624.97 23073.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

15113.60 16624.97 23073.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha 32886.40 43375.03 96926.97Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

32886.40 43375.03 96926.97

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 188.92 166.25 115.37Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 188.92 166.25 115.37

Net Return / Quintal 411.08 433.75 484.63Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 411.08 433.75 484.63

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 8 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Vegetables

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 233: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 80.00 500.00 40000 100.00 500.00 50000 200.00 500.00 100000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 40000 50000 100000Input KGSeeds 20.00 12.00 240.00 22.00 12.00 264.00 30.00 12.00 360.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 10.00 9.26 92.60 11.00 9.26 101.86 25.00 9.26 231.50Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 2.00 10.13 20.26 2.20 10.13 22.29 10.00 10.13 101.30Potasium Fertiliser(K) 1.00 8.02 8.02 1.10 8.02 8.82 10.00 8.02 80.20Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 10.00 50.00 500.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 30.00 50.00 1500.00 33.00 50.00 1650.00 30.00 50.00 1500.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal7.00 20.00 140.00 7.70 20.00 154.00 60.00 20.00 1200.00

Sub-Total 2910.88 3201.97 4683.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 142.54 156.80 231.15

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 184.56 203.02 1256.27

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 87.33 96.06 140.49

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 3325.31 3657.84 6310.91Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

3325.31 3657.84 6310.91

Net Return Rs. /Ha 36674.69 46342.16 93689.09Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

36674.69 46342.16 93689.09

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 41.57 36.58 31.55Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 41.57 36.58 31.55

Net Return / Quintal 458.43 463.42 468.45Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 458.43 463.42 468.45

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 9 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Potato

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 234: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1400.00 14000 15.00 1400.00 21000 40.00 1400.00 56000b) By Product 10.00 70.00 700 15.00 70.00 1050 0.00 70.00 0Total 14700 22050 56000Input KGSeeds 20.00 6.00 120.00 22.00 6.00 132.00 7.00 6.00 42.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 42.00 9.26 388.92 46.20 9.26 427.81 15.00 9.26 138.90Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 25.00 10.13 253.25 27.50 10.13 278.58 4.00 10.13 40.52Potasium Fertiliser(K) 20.00 8.02 160.40 22.00 8.02 176.44 3.00 8.02 24.06Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 6.00 50.00 300.00 6.60 50.00 330.00 8.00 50.00 400.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 25.00 50.00 1250.00 27.50 50.00 1375.00 25.00 50.00 1250.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal6.60 20.00 132.00 7.26 20.00 145.20 25.00 20.00 500.00

Sub-Total 3014.57 3316.03 2905.48Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 147.73 162.50 142.27

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 178.40 196.24 538.56

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 90.44 99.48 87.16

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 3431.13 3774.25 3673.47Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

3431.13 3774.25 3673.47

Net Return Rs. /Ha 11268.87 18275.75 52326.53Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

11268.87 18275.75 52326.53

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 343.11 251.62 91.84Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 343.11 251.62 91.84

Net Return / Quintal 1126.89 1218.38 1308.16Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1126.89 1218.38 1308.16

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 10 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Wheat

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 235: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 7.50 2500.00 18750 8.25 2500.00 20625 15.00 2500.00 37500b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 18750 20625 37500Input KGSeeds 19.00 12.00 228.00 20.90 12.00 250.80 20.00 12.00 240.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 30.00 9.26 277.80 33.00 9.26 305.58 20.00 9.26 185.20Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 10.00 10.13 101.30 11.00 10.13 111.43 5.00 10.13 50.65Potasium Fertiliser(K) 33.00 8.02 264.66 36.30 8.02 291.13 5.00 8.02 40.10Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 2.00 50.00 100.00 2.20 50.00 110.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 13.00 50.00 650.00 14.30 50.00 715.00 25.00 50.00 1250.00Animal Power BPD 1.00 100.00 100.00 1.10 100.00 110.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal7.50 20.00 150.00 8.25 20.00 165.00 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 2081.76 2289.94 3325.95Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 101.09 111.20 163.30

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 180.77 198.85 840.54

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 62.45 68.70 99.78

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 2426.07 2668.68 4429.56Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

2426.07 2668.68 4429.56

Net Return Rs. /Ha 16323.93 17956.32 33070.44Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

16323.93 17956.32 33070.44

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 323.48 323.48 295.30Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 323.48 323.48 295.30

Net Return / Quintal 2176.52 2176.52 2204.70Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 2176.52 2176.52 2204.70

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 11 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Sunflower

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 236: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 300.00 500.00 150000 400.00 500.00 200000 750.00 500.00 375000b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 150000 200000 375000Input KGSeeds 10.00 8.00 80.00 11.00 8.00 88.00 20.00 8.00 160.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 8.00 9.26 74.08 8.80 9.26 81.49 20.00 9.26 185.20Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 7.00 10.13 70.91 7.70 10.13 78.00 5.00 10.13 50.65Potasium Fertiliser(K) 15.00 8.02 120.30 16.50 8.02 132.33 5.00 8.02 40.10Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 5.00 50.00 250.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 10.00 50.00 500.00 11.00 50.00 550.00 25.00 50.00 1250.00Animal Power BPD 2.00 100.00 200.00 2.20 100.00 220.00 3.00 100.00 300.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal72.00 20.00 1440.00 79.20 20.00 1584.00 40.00 20.00 800.00

Sub-Total 2745.29 3019.82 3245.95Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 134.26 147.69 159.30

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1460.47 1606.52 839.22

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 82.36 90.59 97.38

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 4422.38 4864.62 4341.85Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

4422.38 4864.62 4341.85

Net Return Rs. /Ha 145577.62 195135.38 370658.15Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

145577.62 195135.38 370658.15

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 14.74 12.16 5.79Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 14.74 12.16 5.79

Net Return / Quintal 485.26 487.84 494.21Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 485.26 487.84 494.21

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 12 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Sugarcane

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 237: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 10.00 1798.00 17980 15.00 1798.00 26970 30.00 1798.00 53940b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 17980 26970 53940Input KGSeeds 30.00 22.00 660.00 33.00 22.00 726.00 70.00 22.00 1540.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 55.00 9.26 509.30 60.50 9.26 560.23 120.00 9.26 1111.20Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 20.00 10.13 202.60 22.00 10.13 222.86 40.00 10.13 405.20Potasium Fertiliser(K) 65.00 8.02 521.30 71.50 8.02 573.43 140.00 8.02 1122.80Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 6.00 50.00 300.00 6.60 50.00 330.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 40.00 50.00 2000.00 44.00 50.00 2200.00 90.00 50.00 4500.00Animal Power BPD 8.00 100.00 800.00 8.80 100.00 880.00 20.00 100.00 2000.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal25.00 20.00 500.00 27.50 20.00 550.00 66.05 20.00 1321.00

Sub-Total 5703.20 6273.52 12960.20Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 282.16 310.38 645.01

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 584.55 643.00 1511.34

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 171.10 188.21 388.81

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 6741.00 7415.10 15505.36Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

6741.00 7415.10 15505.36

Net Return Rs. /Ha 11239.00 19554.90 38434.64Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

11239.00 19554.90 38434.64

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 674.10 494.34 516.85Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 674.10 494.34 516.85

Net Return / Quintal 1123.90 1303.66 1281.15Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges 1123.90 1303.66 1281.15

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 13 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Pulses

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 238: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Crop Index 1

Output /Input item UnitTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price ValueTechnical Coefficient

Unit Price

Value

Output Quintala) Main Product 100.00 0.00 0 200.00 0.00 0 400.00 0.00 0b) By Product 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0Total 0 0 0Input KGSeeds 100.00 25.00 2500.00 110.00 25.00 2750.00 100.00 25.00 2500.00Nitrogen Fertiliser (N) 75.00 9.26 694.50 82.50 9.26 763.95 90.00 9.26 833.40Phosphorus Fertiliser(P) 50.00 10.13 506.50 55.00 10.13 557.15 40.00 10.13 405.20Potasium Fertiliser(K) 140.00 8.02 1122.80 154.00 8.02 1235.08 170.00 8.02 1363.40Farm Yard Manure(FYM) M.T. 15.00 50.00 750.00 16.50 50.00 825.00 15.00 50.00 750.00Plant Protection Rs./Ha 1.00 150.00 150.00 1.10 150.00 165.00 1.00 150.00 150.00Human Labour Man Day 80.00 50.00 4000.00 88.00 50.00 4400.00 100.00 50.00 5000.00Animal Power BPD 15.00 100.00 1500.00 16.50 100.00 1650.00 5.00 100.00 500.00Machine Power Hours 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00Irigation Charges Rs. /Ha 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00Land Revenue Rs. /Ha 1.00 10.00 10.00 1.10 10.00 11.00 1.00 10.00 10.00Depreciation /Maintenance Rs. /Ha 1.00 50.00 50.00 1.10 50.00 55.00 1.00 50.00 50.00

Transportation/ Packing Cost Rs. /Quintal66.00 20.00 1320.00 72.60 20.00 1452.00 250.00 20.00 5000.00

Sub-Total 12603.80 13864.18 16562.00Contingencies @ 10% of 50% of Working Capital

Rs. /Ha 627.19 689.91 825.10

Interest Charges @ 12% of on 50% of the Crop Period on full Work. Cap. &

Rs. /Ha 1504.50 1654.95 5189.07

Misc. Expenditure @ 3% of Cost of Production. Rs. /Ha 378.11 415.93 496.86

Total Cost of Production Rs. /Ha 15113.60 16624.97 23073.03Total Cost of Production Excluding Irrigation Charge

15113.60 16624.97 23073.03

Net Return Rs. /Ha -15113.60 -16624.97 -23073.03Net Return Excluding Irrigation Charges

-15113.60 -16624.97 -23073.03

Cost of Production / Quintal Rs. /Ha 151.14 83.12 57.68Cost of Production / Quintal Excluding Irrigation Charges Rs. /Ha 151.14 83.12 57.68

Net Return / Quintal -151.14 -83.12 -57.68Net Return / Quintal excluding Irrigation charges -151.14 -83.12 -57.68

*M.T- Metric Ton*BPD- Bullock Pair Days

Input Related to Output Present Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/Qtl Situation Average/QtlLabour in harvest (Manday/Ha)

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

20.00 24.00 480.0048.00

Labour in Post-harvest(Manday/Ha)

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

5.00 24.00 120.0012.00

Labour in transportation(Manday/ha)

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

3.00 24.00 72.007.20

Transportation (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Packing materials (Rs/Ha) 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00 1.00 300.00 300.00 30.00Transportation & Packing 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20 672.00 67.20

Annexure-20.2 ( 14 of 14 )

ECONOMICAL CROP BUDGET FOR

Fodder

Present Situation Future Situation (Without Project ) Future Situation (With Project )

Page 239: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXI-1

CHAPTER-XXI

REVENUES

21.0 The Lower Vansadhara Project will be implemented by WRD, Government of Odisha

under AIBP scheme. At present, the farmers are supposed to get the irrigation water for

free, because the command area lies in the backward districts of Odisha. As such, no

revenues will be generated from the project. However, in the due course of the time, if

the irrigation department as well as Govt of Odisha feels that farmers are in a position to

pay the water levy, the same will be charged to the farmers. Therefore, no analysis has

been carried out for the revenues which may be generated, if water levy is imposed, since

there are proposals for it at the present.

Page 240: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXII-1

CHAPTER-XXII

FUTURE UTILIZATION OF BUILDING

22.1 DETAILS OF BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED

To meet the peak requirement of the Project the following type of Residential &Non-

Residential type of Buildings are proposed for construction.

22.1.1 Permanent Residential Building

Sl.No. Description

Unit –I Permanent

Unit Area(m2)

Total PlinthArea

1 CE/SE -Type

2 200 400

2 EE - Type 2 150 300

3 A -Type 6 104 6244 B -Type 18 70 1260

5 C -Type 10 49 490

Total Plinth Area 2674

Sl. No. Type

Unit- II Permanent

No. Area(m2)

Total PlinthArea

1 CE/SE -Type

1 200 200

2 EE - Type 4 150 6003 A -Type 14 104 14564 B -Type 20 70 14005 C -Type 5 49 245

Total Plinth Area 3701

Page 241: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXII-2

22.1.2 Temporary Residential Building

Sl.No.

Description

Unit –I Temporary

Unit Area(m2)

TotalPlinthArea

1 CE/SE -Type

3 200 600

2 EE - Type 3 150 4503 A -Type 9 104 9364 B -Type 27 70 18905 C -Type 10 49 490

Total Plinth Area 4366

Sl. No. Type

Unit- II Temporary

No. Area Total PlinthArea

1 CE/SE -Type

2 200 400

2 EE - Type 0 150 03 A -Type 6 104 6244 B -Type 10 70 7005 C -Type 4 49 196

Total Plinth Area 1920

22.1.3 Permanent Non-Residential Building

Sl.No.

Description Permanentfor Unit- I

(m2)1 Offices 10002 VIP Guest House 500

3 Dispensary/Hospital (2 nos.)4 Guest House/Transit Camp/Field

Hostel 200

5 Executive Club 200

Page 242: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXII-3

6 Non-Executive Club 2007 Bank & Post Office 200

8 Community Hall (2 nos) 4009 School (3 nos.) 200

10 Security Staff 200

11 Canteen 20012 CheckPost/Tel.exch/Petrl 200

13 Fire Fighting 20014 Store Shed/DG Shed/Workshop/Expl.

etc700

Total Plinth Area 4400

Sl. No. Description Permanentfor Unit-II (m2)

1 Offices 10002 VIP Guest House 2003 Dispensary/Hospital (2 nos.) 100

4Guest House/Transit Camp/FieldHostel

400

5 Executive Club 200

6 Non-Executive Club 2007 School (3 nos.) 200

8 Security Staff 2009 Canteen 100

10 CheckPost/Tel.exch/Petrl 45011 Fire Fighting 400

12Store Shed/DGShed/Workshop/Expl. etc

200

Total Plinth Area 3650

22.1.4 Temporary Non-Residential Building

Sl.No.

Description TemporaryUnit- I

(m2)1 Offices 16002 VIP Guest House 200

3 Dispensary/Hospital (2 nos.) 400

Page 243: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXII-4

4 Guest House/Transit Camp/FieldHostel 400

5 Executive Club 200

6 Non-Executive Club7 Bank & Post Office

8 Community Hall (2 nos)

9 School (3 nos.) 40010 Security Staff

11 Canteen 30012 CheckPost/Tel.exch/Petrol

13 Fire Fighting 400

14 Store Shed/DG Shed/Workshop/Expl.etc

450

Total Plinth Area 4350

Sl. No. Description TemporaryUnit-II

(m2)1 Offices 10002 VIP Guest House 2003 Dispensary/Hospital (2 nos.) 300

4Guest House/Transit Camp/FieldHostel

600

5 Executive Club 100

6 Non-Executive Club 07 School (3 nos.)

8 Security Staff 09 Canteen 200

10 CheckPost/Tel.exch/Petrol 011 Fire Fighting 0

12Store Shed/DGShed/Workshop/Expl. etc

450

Total Plinth Area 2850

22.2 DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENT OF BUILDING

82 Nos of Residential accommodations have been considered under Permanent

Residential during the O&M phase of the project. As such all the Building considered

Page 244: LOWER VANSADHARA PROEJCT, STAGE I, ODISHA DETAILED …environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/16_Feb_2017... · various structures (spillway, weir, barrage etc.) : Yes

Lower Vansadhara Project (Stage-I) Detailed Project Report

XXII-5

under Permanent Residential Building shall be fully utilize during the O&M phase of the

plant.

Permanent Non-Residential Building as envisaged under 22.1.3(8050sq.m) shall also be

utilized fully during the Q&M phase of the plant.

The temporary buildings as envisaged under 22.1.2& 22.1.4 shall be utilized by the

maintenance contractor and also for other Misc. purpose.

22.3 REQUIREMENT OF THE BUILDING BY OTHER AGENCIES

Parts of the buildings considered under the head temporary (both Residential & Non-

Residential) shall be initially given to the contractors on selective basis to meet the

security aspects of the Project. Police station or any other administrative office for Govt.

of Odisha can be accommodated in these accommodations.

22.4 UTILIZATION OF SURPLUS BUILDINGS

Surplus Buildings under the sub head Temporary construction are insignificant.