loss of heterozygosity and mutational analysis of the pten ... · north texas. dr. muller is an...
TRANSCRIPT
Vol. 4, 2577-2583, November 1998 Clinical Cancer Research 2577
Advances in Brief
Loss of Heterozygosity and Mutational Analysis of the
PTEN/MMAC1 Gene in Synchronous Endometrial
and Ovarian Carcinomas1
w. Michael Lin, Eva Forgacs, David P. Warshal,
I. Tien Yeh, Joilyn S. Martin, Raheela Ashfaq,
and Carolyn Y. Muller�Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology [W. M. L., C. Y. Ml,Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research [W. M. L., E. F.,C. Y. Ml, and Departments of Pathology [R. A.], University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, and
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology [D. P. W., J. S. M.] andPathology [I. T. Y.], Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington,
Pennsylvania 19001
AbstractMutations of the human putative protein tyrosine phos-
phatase (PTEN/MMACJ) gene at chromosome 10q23 have
been found frequently in type I endometrial carcinomas.
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the most frequent histol.
ogy seen in patients with clinically determined synchronous
endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. We report a high
incidence of PTEN/MMACJ mutations and 10q23 loss of
heterozygosity (LOH) in patients with synchronous endome.
trial and ovarian carcinomas. Paraffin-embedded precision
microdissected tumors were analyzed for 10 matched syn-
chronous endometrial and ovarian cancers and 1 1 matched
control metastatic endometrial cancers. Single-stranded
conformation polymorphism analysis was used to screen for
mutations in all tumors and corresponding normal lympho-
cyte DNA. LOH was determined using a panel of four
microsatellite markers within the PTEN/MMACJ locus.
PTEN/MMACJ mutations were found in 43% (9 of 21) of the
endometrial cancers studied, similarly represented in the
clinically synchronous group (5 of 10 or 50%) and the
advanced metastatic group (4 of 11; 36%; P = 0.53). In two
of the five cases of clinically synchronous cancers, identical
or progressive PTEN mutations were found in both the
Received 6/17/98; revised 8/19/98: accepted 9/2/98.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by thepayment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely toindicate this fact.I Supported in part by the Reproductive Scientist Development Programthrough NIH Grant K12HD00849, the American Association of Obste-trician Gynecologist Foundation, and Cancer Research Foundation of
North Texas. Dr. Muller is an AAOGF-NICHD Fellow of the Repro-ductive Scientist Development Program. This study was presented at the
27th Annual Meeting of the Western Association of Gynecologic On-cologists, Napa, CA, May 20-23, 1998.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Hamon Centerfor Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas SouthwesternMedical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9032.Phone: (214) 648-3026; Fax: (214) 648-8404; E-mail: [email protected].
endometrial and ovarian cancers, suggesting that the ovar-
ian tumor is a mestastasis from the endometrial primary.
PTEN/MMACJ mutations in the advanced endometrial can-
cers were similar in the corresponding metastases. In one
case, the mutation was seen in only one of two metastatic
lymph nodes. The LOH analysis demonstrated 55% LOH in
at least one PTEN/MMACI marker. These findings suggest
that the putative tumor suppressor gene PTEN/MMACJ
may be a viable molecular marker to differentiate synchro-
nous versus metastatic disease in a subset of clinically syn-
chronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas.
IntroductionSynchronous primary neoplasms of the female reproduc-
tive tract occur in 0.7%-l.7% of all gynecological malignancies
with the majority involving both the endometnum and the ovary
( 1 , 2). Synchronous endometrial cancers have been seen in
12-50% of patients with newly diagnosed endometrioid ovarian
cancer (3, 4). Although most clinical reviews support a good
prognosis for early stage synchronous ovarian and endometrial
tumors (2-8), confidence of the correct staging can impact
significantly on recommendations for or against adjuvant treat-
ment. Women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer
are significantly younger (5, 6, 9) than women with either
primary endometrial or primary ovarian cancers alone. This
suggests that perhaps a specific germ-line genetic predisposition
or sporadic gene target may play a role in this small subgroup of
cancers.
Recently, a new candidate tumor suppressor gene,
also called MMACI, was identified and localized to chromo-
some region l0q23.3 (10, 1 1). PTEN/MMACJ shares sequence
homology with the protein tyrosine phosphatase family as well
as with the cytoskeletal proteins, tensin and auxilin. PTEN/
MMACJ is found frequently mutated in gliomas, prostate can-
cers, melanomas, and endometrial cancers (10, 12, 13), with less
frequent mutations in breast and lung cancers (14, 15), and may
be associated with a metastatic phenotype (1 1). Germ-line mu-
tations were found in the PTEN/MMACJ gene for affected
individuals with Cowden disease, a hereditary autosomal dom-
inant cancer syndrome associated with a predisposition to thy-
roid, breast, endometrial, and skin cancers and in the Bannayan-
Zonana syndrome (16-18). Endometrial cancers due to
Cowden’s syndrome are rare, and ovarian cancers have not been
associated with either hereditary syndrome.
3 The abbreviations used are: PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homologuedeleted on chromosome ten; MMAC, mutated in multiple advancedcancers; SSCP, single-stranded conformation polymorphism: LOH. lossof heterozygosity; GDB, Genome Database; MA, microsatellite alter-ation; RER, replication error.
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Ovarian histology
EndometrioidEndometrioidROVb clear cellLOVC endometrioid
EndometrioidEndometrioidEndometrioidEndometrioid
EndometrioidEndometrioidClear cell
Caseno. Age
Endometrialhistology
51 46 Endometrioid52 49 Endometrioid
53 62 Adenoacanthoma”
54 60 Endometrioid55 55 Endometrioid56 68 Endometrioid57 50 Endometrioid58 52 Endometrioid59 41 AdenoacanthomaSlO 73 Clear cell
Ml 49 EndometrioidM2 8! Pap serous”M3 70 EndometrioidM4 70 EndometrioidMS 44 AdenosquamouseM6 73 EndometrioidM7 74 Pap serousM8 80 EndometrioidM9 69 Pap serousMlO 79 EndometrioidMl I 66 Endometrioid
Ovarianstage/grade
IC/G2IA/Gl
LIC
IC/G3HB/G2
IHB/G1IA/Gl
IC/GlIIC/GlIIC
Endometrialstage/grade
IB/G2IA/Gl
IHA/G3
IB/G1
IB/G2
IB/Gl
IB/Gl
IAJG1
UA/Gl
IAfflC/G2HICIVB/G3fflC/G3fflC/G2IHC/G2IVBfflC/G3ifiCIHA/G2ifiC
a Adenoacanthoma, endometrioid tumor with benign squamous differentiation.b ROy, right ovary.C LOV, left ovary.d Pap serous, papillary serous carcinoma.e Adenosquamous, endometrioid tumor with malignant squamous differentiation.
2578 PTEN Gene in Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers
Table 1 Clinical features of 10 synchronous tumors and 1 1 metastatic tumors
Two recent studies have found the overall PTEN/MMACJ
mutation frequency to be 34-50% in endometrial carcinoma
(13, 19). PTEN/MMACJ mutations seem to represent the most
common defined genetic alteration identified to date in endo-
metrial cancer and strongly suggest that mutations in PTEN/
MMACJ play a significant role in the pathogenesis of the most
common type of endometrial adenocarcinoma. In primary ovar-
ian carcinomas, PTEN/MMACI mutations have not been de-
scribed in serous or mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers to date
(13, 20). However, PTEN/MMACJ mutations have been re-
ported in 21% of primary endometrioid ovarian carcinomas
(21).
In an attempt to identify a novel genetic marker for differ-
entiating synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas from
metastatic endometrial carcinomas to the ovary, we analyzed 10
clinically determined matched synchronous cancers and 11
known metastatic endometrial carcinomas for mutations in the
PTEN/MMACI gene and alterations in the PTEN/MMACJ gene
locus.
Materials and MethodsTissue Samples. Paraffin-embedded archival histology
slides for 10 cases of matched primary synchronous endometrial
and ovarian tumors and 1 1 cases of matched primary endome-
trial and metastatic tumors were retrieved from the Department
of Pathology at the Abington Memorial Hospital, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, from 1992 to 1996. Cases were chosen based on
availabilities of adequate tumor and normal tissue. Cases were
reviewed by two skilled gynecological pathologists (I. T. Y. and
R. A.). Table 1 shows the histology and clinical features of 21
cases studied. The median age of the synchronous group was 55
years (range, 46-73), and the median age of the metastatic
group was 70 (range, 44-81). In the synchronous group (n =
10), there were 7 cases of pure endometrioid cancers, 2 cases of
adenoacanthomas, and 1 case of clear cell carcinoma. In the
metastatic group (n = 1 1), there were 7 cases of pure endo-
metrioid cancers, 3 cases of papillary serous cancers, and 1 case
of adenosquamous carcinoma. The staging for the majority of
cases in the synchronous group was stage I based on the Fed-
#{233}rationInternationale des Gynaecologistes et Obstetristes clas-
sification (22), whereas the metastatic group were all stages
III-IV (Table 1).
Microdissection and DNA Isolation. Regions of pri-
mary endometrial and ovarian cancers and metastatic implants
(peritoneum, lymph node, and omentum) were identified. Pre-
cision microdissection was performed on targeted tumor regions
to obtain pure tumor populations without normal tissue contam-
ination. Approximately 500-1000 tumor cells were microdis-
sected for each case. For SSCP analysis, tumor tissues were
scraped using sterile blades to achieve populations >70% tumor
cells. Matched normal nodal tissue or normal stroma or myo-
metrium were used as a source of constitutional normal DNA.
DNA was extracted using proteinase K, as described previously
(23).
SScP Analysis. SSCP analysis was performed on
genomic DNA prepared from scraped paraffin slides. Two-
round PCR was performed using 13 primer sets covering nine
exons of the PTEN/MMACJ gene as described previously (15).
The products were diluted 1:5 in formamide dye, heat dena-
tured, snap chilled, and run on 0.5 X Mutation Detection En-
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Clinical Cancer Research 2579
hancement gels (FMC Bioproducts, Rockland, ME) with and
without 10% glycerol at 5 W overnight and subjected to auto-
radiography for 24 h.
DNA Sequencing. Shifted SSCP bands were excised
from Mutation Detection Enhancement gels. The DNA was
eluted with distilled water and reamplified using the original
PCR primers. The reamplified PCR products were run on a 2%
agarose gel, excised, and purified by Geneclean (BlO 101, Inc.,
Vista, CA). Automated bidirectional sequencing was performed
on the purified DNA template using the ABI 377 Dye Termi-
nator cycle sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Foster City,
CA). Sequences were analyzed and compared with the wild-type
PTEN/MMACJ sequence (GenBank Accession nos. AF000726
to AF000734; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) with DNAStar software
(DNAStar, Inc., Madison, WI).
LOH Analysis. To evaluate LOH, a panel of four mic-
rosatellite markers were used, of which two are flanking
the PTEN/MMAC1 gene (D10S185, GDB 187826; D10S215,
GDB 188322), and two are intragenic to PTEN/MMACJ
(AFMO86wg9, GDB 1222085; D10S2491, GDB 6654876). The
primer sequences were obtained from the GDB (www.gdb.org).
A two-round multiplex PCR method was used to amplify the
microsatellite markers from microdissected cells as described
previously (24). Multiplex (four primer sets in each reaction)
PCR was done during the first amplification, followed by uni-
plex PCR for the individual markers. These results were con-
firmed in duplicate. The final product was separated on a 6%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel and subjected to autoradiogra-
phy. The sizes and relative intensities of alleles from the normal
stroma and invasive tumors were compared directly. Markers
that identified two distinguishable alleles of different sizes but
similar intensities in the lane having constitutional normal DNA
were termed as “informative” (i.e., heterozygous). Markers that
depicted a single allele in the normal DNA were termed as
“noninformative” (i.e., homozygous). Visual detection of com-
plete absence of either allele was required to designate LOH at
that marker due to the precision of the microdissection tech-
mque. Markers that gave repeatable shifted bands or expanded
bands as compared with the normal control DNA were termed
as MAs.
Statistical Analysis. The difference in the frequency of
PTEN/MMACJ mutations and MA between the clinically syn-
chronous tumors and the known metastatic tumors were ana-
lyzed by two-sided x2 or Fisher’s exact test. The association
between LOH at PTEN/MMACJ markers and PTEN/MMACJ
mutations were also analyzed by two-sided x2 or Fisher’s exact
test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
ResultsSSCP and Sequence Analysis. The entire open reading
frame of PTEN/MMACJ was analyzed using 13 primer pairs
across nine exons from 10 matched cases of primary synchro-
nous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas with respective nor-
mal lymph nodes and 1 1 cases of known metastatic endometria!
carcinomas with matched metastatic and normal lymph node
tissues. SSCP analyses were performed to screen for potential
mutations on a total of 37 samples (21 endometrial, 10 ovarian,
and 6 metastatic lesions). Case S3 had two separate ovarian
primaries (endometrioid and clear cell); however, only the clear
cell ovarian primary was available for adequate evaluation. The
overall incidence of PTEN/MMACJ mutation in our series of
endometrial cancer is 43%. Of the 10 matched primary synchro-
nous endometrial and ovarian tumors, five cases (50%) of the
endometrial carcinomas demonstrated PTEN/MMACJ muta-
tions. Interestingly, two of these five cases (51 and 52) demon-
strated the identical mutations in the corresponding ovarian
tumor (Fig. 1A; Table 2), whereas the corresponding ovarian
tumors in the three remaining endometrial cancers with PTEN/
MMACJ mutations (53, 54, and 55) demonstrated the wild-type
PTEN/MMACJ band pattern by SSCP (Fig. 1B). Of the 11
known metastatic endometrial carcinomas, 4 cases (36%) of
either endometrial carcinomas or the metastatic sites were found
to have PTEN/MMACJ mutations (Table 2). Because of the
availability of metastatic tissues (many metastases were small
microscopic foci of tumor cells within nodal tissues), only six
matched metastatic cases were adequate for SSCP analysis
(Table 3). As expected, three metastatic cases (Ml, M2, and
M3) showed common PTEN/MMACJ mutations in both the
endometrial carcinomas and the matched metastatic tumor site
(Fig. 1 C). However, one metastatic endometrial cancer (M4)
revealed a PTEN/MMACJ mutation in endometrial cancer cells
within one of two paraaortic lymph nodes tested and not in the
primary endometrial tumor. In all cases that demonstrated iden-
tical PTEN/MMACJ mutations (51, 52, Ml, M2, and M3), no
aberrant SSCP bandshifts were found in the normal lympho-
cytes, therefore excluding the possibility of germ-line muta-
tions.
LOH Analysis. All 21 patient cases (21 endometrial
carcinomas, 10 ovarian carcinomas, and 1 1 metastases) were
analyzed for LOH within the PTEN/MMACJ region using four
microsatellite markers, two flanking the PTEN/MMACJ gene
(D10S185 and D10S215) and two intragenic (AFMO86wg9 and
D10S2491) to the PTEN/MMACJ gene (Table 3; Fig. 2). Case
Ml demonstrates loss of the upper allele in both the endometrial
and metastatic tumors consistent with its metastatic biology
suggested by the clinical stage and molecularly by the PTEN/
MMACJ mutational analysis (Fig. 2; Table 2). Case S3 has loss
of the upper allele only in the ovarian tumor (Fig. 2). Because
case 53 demonstrated PTEN/MMACJ mutation only in the en-
dometrium, LOH seen at this locus likely represents an inde-
pendent acquired event in the synchronous primary ovarian
tumor. Case M8 shows loss of the upper allele only in the
metastatic tissue not seen in the endometrial primary tumor,
suggesting further alteration in the PTEN/MMACI gene locus in
the metastatic clonal population of tumor cells (Fig. 2). Com-
parison between case 53 and M8 demonstrates the unreliability
of using LOH as a sole predictor of metastatic clonality. As
expected, MAs were common and were found in 38% (16 of 42)
of all tumor sites, and there were no statistical differences
between the frequency of MAs in the clinically synchronous
group (7 of 20; 35%) versus the known metastatic group (9 of
22; 41%; P = 0.49). Of the 42 tumor specimens evaluated, LOH
at any PTEN/MMACJ marker was found in 55% (23 of 42).
Furthermore, PTEN/MMACJ mutations were detected in 52%
(12 of 23) of tumor sites with chromosome 10q23 LOH versus
26% (5 of 19) in tumor sites without LOH (P = 0.09).
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
A CaseS2 B CaseS4 C Case M3
N E 0 N E 0 N E M
I I
LI�..I*_ Shifted bWIdSExon 7
13 bp deletion
�
Shifted band
Exon 8
AtoG
+�AA�JGAAZJa��A 2� A5�.k57G2 � IC WC
Shifted bandsExon 8
4 bp deletion
++AAA AAAG �CA/(X�AA�(�G
Normal Stroma Normal Stroma Normal Stroma
Endometrial CA
AAACAGAAC5A� A: AC IC CA GGGAG � � � � /#{149}� �G. GA A A C Pt3 � p�
Endometrial CA
AAAJGAhT�AA G � � �A �3fiW�A
Endometrial CA
A C � p�3 � � � AA��AA�A�AA
Ovarian CA Omentum
Fig. I SSCP analysis of representative synchronous and advanced metastatic endometrial cancers. N. normal stroma; E. endometrial carcinoma: 0.ovarian carcinoma; M, metastatic site. Mutations accounting for the shifted bands are given in Table 2. A, case 52. Identical SSCP shifts are shownin both the endometrial and ovarian cancers. B, case 54. A SSCP shift is shown only in the endometrial cancer and not in the ovarian cancer. C, caseM3. Identical SSCP shifts are shown in both the endometrial cancer and the omental metastasis.
2580 PTEN Gene in Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers
Discussion
Clinical differentiation between synchronous endome-
trial and ovarian tumors versus metastatic primary tumors is
challenging. The final diagnosis determines the necessity and
the types of adjuvant treatment recommended. Molecular
analysis targeting critical tumor suppressor gene loci in-
volved in endometrial carcinogenesis may be useful in deter-
mining the likelihood of simultaneous distinct primary tu-
mors (25-28). With the recent identification of PTEN/
MMACJ, a putative tumor suppressor gene that is likely the
single most commonly mutated gene in endometrial carcino-
mas, we evaluated PTEN/MMAC1 mutations in 10 clinically
synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors and 1 1 known
metastatic endometrial carcinomas to determine its clinical
utility as a novel genetic marker.
In our study, PTEN/MMACJ mutations occurred in 43% of
the endometnal cancers, which is similar to previous reports
( 13, 19). We hypothesized that PTEN/MMACJ mutations may
be a more common event or alternatively an unrecognized
germ-line predisposition in the clinically synchronous tumors
because the mean age of patients is less than those with primary
cancer alone (5, 6, 9). However, we found no statistical signif-
icance in the incidence of mutations within these two groups
(50% versus 36%; P 0.53). This analysis is limited, however,
by a small sample size.
Five cases of the clinically synchronous tumors had PTEN/
MMACJ mutations, and two of the five matched pairs had
common mutations in both the endometrial and the ovarian
tumors. Although PTEN/MMACJ mutations have been reported
in primary endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (21), it is highly
unlikely that the identical mutations occurred during embryo-
genesis within the mullerian tissues or occurred spontaneously.
Therefore, these findings suggest that identical mutations in
both endometrial and ovarian tumors within these cases are
consistent with metastatic endometrial cancer to the ovary. The
clinical stage assigned to the endometrial cancer in case S 1 was
stage IB/G2, which would be predicted to have a 15-30%
metastatic risk and could explain the apparent IC ovarian cancer
as a metastasis (29). However, we were surprised to find the
same mutation in two clinically assigned stage IA/G 1 endome-
trial and ovarian cancers in case 52 that would predict a low
likelihood of metastasis in either primary organ site. Therefore,
our data suggest that the stage and grade alone cannot ade-
quately predict the synchronicity of these tumors.
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Syn vs. Met” Sample Tumor site Mutation Exon Codon Predicted effect
Synchronous 51SiSI
EndometriumOvaryOvary
202 del TA202 del TAG425A
33S
6868
142
Stop at codon 72Stop at codon 72Arg to Gln
Synchronous S2S2
EndometriumOvary
792 del 13 bp792 del 13 bp
77
264264
Stop at codon 296
Stop at codon 296Synchronous S3 Endometrium G646A 7 216 Va! to MetSynchronous S4 Endometrium A992G 8 331 Asp to Gly
Synchronous SS Endometrium GS9A I 20 Gly to GluMetastasis to paraaortic node Ml
MlMl
EndometriumParaaortic nodeParaaortic node
800 del A800 del AC680T
777
267267227
Stop at codon 275Stop at codon 275Ser to Phe
Metastasis to iliac node M2M2M2
EndometriumIliac nodeEndometrium
97 del A97 del A228 del AT
224
343476
Stop at codon 53Stop at codon 53Tyr to Stop
Metastasis to omentum M3M3M4
EndometriumOmentumParaaortic node
955 del 4 bp955 del 4 bpG4SOT
88S
3193 19ISO
Thr to StopThr to StopGlu to AspMetastasis to paraaortic node
a Syn, synchronous tumors; Met, metastatic tumors.
Table 3 LOH analysis of PTEN/MMACI region
Case Tumor site” D10S185” AFMO86wg9” D10S2491” DJOS2JS” PTEN mutationc
SI ENDO EJ 0 0 +
SI OV EJ 0 0 +
S2 ENDO 0 0 +
S2 OV 0 0 +
S3 ENDO i::� 0 .4-
S3 OV 0 -
S4 ENDO i::� 0 +
S4 OV E:J 0 EJ -
S5 ENDO - 0 +
S5 OV EJ 0 E1 0 -S6 ENDO -S6 OV v� -Si ENDO 0 -
Si OV 0 r� -
S8 ENDO 0 .
S8 OV0 .
S9 ENDO E:J 0 t::i -
S9 OV - -
Sb ENDO 0 0 -
Sb OV 0 -
Ml ENDO - 0 +
MI MET - 0 EJ +
M2 ENDO c:� 0 E�J +
M2 MET EJ 0 EJ +
M3 ENDO 0 - +
M3 MET 0 +
M4 ENDO - 0 0 .
M4 MET - 0 +
MS ENDO 0 0 -
MS MET �?A
M6 ENDO 0 0 �l -
M6 MET 0 - ND
M7 ENDO EJ 0 EJ -
M7 MET EJ 0 �I ND
MS ENDO c:� 0 .
MS MET - 0 - -
M9 ENDO 0 -
M9 MET EJ 0 0 ND
Ml0 ENDO 0 -
MI0 MET 0 ND
MI! ENDO EJ 7/� c::� .
Mu MET ND
a ENDO, endometriurn; OV, ovary; MET, metastatic site.b 0, heterozygous; �, loss of heterozygosity; �, microsatellite alteration; 0, uninformative; blank, no amplification.
C ND, not done.
Clinical Cancer Research 2581
Table 2 PTEN/MMACJ mutations in synchronous and metastatic endometrial tumors
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
NEM NEO
‘4
Case
Marker D1OS18S D1OS18S
Ml S3
D1OS18S
M8
2582 PTEN Gene in Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers
NEM
Fig. 2 LOH on chromosome
______ l0q23 within the PTENIMMACJgene locus. Representative exam-ples of chromosome l0q23 LOH
for marker DJOSJ8S are shownfor case Ml, M8 (advanced met-
astatic), and S3 (clinically syn-
chronous) cancers. N, normal
stroma; E, endometria! carcino-
ma; 0, ovarian carcinoma; M,metastatic site.
As a control population, our metastatic group also demon-
strated a similar incidence of PTEN/MMACJ mutation in endo-
metrial carcinoma. Three of the four matched tumors showed
common PTEN/MMACJ mutations in both the endometrial and
the metastatic lesions with the exception of patient M4, where
the PTEN/MMACJ mutation was reliably found in only one of
two paraaortic lymph nodes evaluated but not in the primary
endometrial tumor. This suggests that a late mutational event
occurred in a clonal metastatic focus in this case.
The ovarian tumor in case S 1, the paraaortic node in case Ml,
and the endometrium in case M2 each had two distinct PTEN/
MMACJ mutations, although we did not further study whether
these represented mutations in the same or alternate allele. In our
series in all cases of “double mutants,” at least one represented a
frameshift mutation introducing an early stop codon. These “double
mutations” have been reported in 16-38% of PTEN/MMACJ mu-
tations in endometrial carcinomas (13, 19). However, we also noted
that the ovarian tumor and endometrial tumor in case 51 shared an
additional loss within an intragenic marker. The requirement for
three genetic events to occur to inactivate the function of the
PTEN/MMACJ gene in the ovarian “metastasis” is unusual and
may represent the PTEN/MMACJ locus as a target for an alternate
mechanism of genomic instability. The presence of mutation in a
single metastasis in case M4 as well as the addition of a second
mutation in the endometrium in case M2 not seen in the metastasis
also lends support to this hypothesis. Because previous authors
have shown a high rate of PTEN/MMACJ mutations in the RER+
phenotype endometrioid endometrial cancers, it is possible that this
site is prone to errors in DNA mismatch repair (13). Although we
found a 38% incidence of MAs in our cases, this must not be
confused with the microsatellite instability represented by the
RER+ phenotype, because our cases were not classified for an
RER+ phenotype. MAs in a small focus of 500-1000 cells ob-
mined by precision microdissection has been described by other
authors (24), but its functional importance is unknown.
The majority of PTEN/MMACJ mutations (1 1 of 17; 65%)
lead to truncated proteins, suggesting a possible loss of phosphatase
activity and altered cell adhesion properties. Interestingly, all five
cases with identical mutation in the matched synchronous tumors
(Sl and 52) and the matched metastatic tumors (Ml, M2, and M3)
had bp deletions leading to predicted truncated proteins and thus
may be a predictor of the metastatic nature of the tumor. Loss of
heterozygosity analysis was also performed to determine the role of
PTEN/MMAC1 as a classic tumor suppressor gene in endometrial
cancer. The LOH analysis demonstrated a 55% LOH in at least one
PTEN/MMAC1 marker. Furthermore, the group with PTEN/
MMACJ LOH showed a relatively higher incidence of PTEN/
MMACJ mutations (52% versus 26%) with a trend toward signif-
icance (P = 0.09). These fmdings are all consistent with those of a
classic tumor suppressor gene and suggest that PTEN/MMACJ
may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of endometrial
adenocarcinoma.
In the LOH analysis, the patterns of loss of heterozygosity
or MA also provided information about the true synchronicity of
these tumors. Cases S3, 55, 58, 59, and 510 demonstrated
dissimilar LOH/MA patterns, suggesting different tumors.
Cases Sl, 52, 56, and S7 demonstrated similar LOH/MA pat-
terns, indicating the possibility of metastatic tumors. As ex-
pected, the known metastatic tumors demonstrated either similar
patterns of LOH/MA or progressive patterns of LOHIMA from
primary tumor to the metastatic site. Because of the quality of
paraffin-embedded DNA, several cases failed to amplify in
markers D10S2491 and D10S215. We believe that these are
largely due to the limitation of paraffin-embedded tissues, but
we recognize that this could also potentially represent homozy-
gous deletions within these markers.
Several epidemiological and clinicopathological studies
have shown that there are two pathogenetic forms of endome-
trial carcinoma. Type I (estrogen-related) neoplasm occurs in
younger, perimenopausal women and tends to be low grade,
whereas type II (non-estrogen-related) occurs in older postm-
enopausal women and is more virulent (30). The predominate
histological subtype demonstrating PTEN/MMACJ mutation as
described previously (13, 19) was the type I estrogen-dependent
endometrioid tumors, with the exception of few cases of adeno-
squamous carcinoma. The predominate histological subtype in
our series is also endometrioid, however, one case of advanced
endometrial adenoacanthoma (endometrioid cancer with squa-
mous differentiation) and one case of advanced metastatic pap-
illary serous (type II) endometrial carcinoma were also found to
have a PTEN/MMACJ mutation.
In summary, our analysis confirms the previously reported
PTEN/MMACJ mutation frequency in endometrial carcinomas,
which appears to be one of the most common mutational events
in the clinically synchronous endometrial cancers. We observed
common PTEN/MMACJ mutations in a subset of clinically
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Clinical Cancer Research 2583
synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, suggesting an
ovarian metastasis from the primary endometrial tumor rather
than independent synchronous tumors. Furthermore, we corre-
lated the LOH with PTEN/MMACJ mutations, supporting the
role of PTEN/MMACJ as a tumor suppressor gene in the patho-
genesis of endometrial carcinoma. These findings suggest that
the putative tumor suppressor gene PTEN/MMACJ may be a
viable genetic marker for differentiating clinically synchronous
endometrial and ovarian carcinoma from metastatic endometrial
carcinoma to the ovary.
AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Dr. John D. Minna for advice, support, and
review of the manuscript.
References1. Eisner, R. F., Nieberg, R. K., and Berek, J. S. Synchronous primary
neoplasms of the female reproductive tract. Gynecol. Oncol., 33: 335-
339, 1989.
2. Ayhan, A., Yalcin, 0. T., Tuncer, Z. S., Gurgan, T., and Kucukali, T.Synchronous primary malignancies of the female genital tract. Eur. J.Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 45: 63-66, 1992.
3. Czernobilsky, B., Silverman, B. B., and Mikuta, J. J. Endometrioid
carcinoma of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of 75 cases. Cancer
(Phila.), 26: 1141-1152, 1970.
4. Kline, R. C., Wharton, J. T., Atkinson, E. N., Burke, T. W., Gersh-enson, D. M., and Edwards, C. L. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary:retrospective review of 145 cases. Gynecol. Oncol., 39: 337-346, 1990.
5. Pearl, M. L., Johnston, C. M., Frank, T. S., and Roberts, J. A.Synchronous dual primary ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. Int. J.Gynaecol. Obstet., 43: 305-312, 1993.
6. Falkenberry, S. S., Steinhoff, M. M., Gordinier, M., Rappoport, S.,Gajewski, W., and Granai, C. 0. Synchronous endometrioid tumors ofthe ovary and endometrium. A clinicopathologic study of 22 cases. J.Reprod. Med., 41: 713-718, 1996.
7. Garzetti, G. G., Ciavattini, A., Goteri, G., De Nictolis, M., Cignitti,M., Tranquilli, A. L., and Romanini, C. Endometrioid carcinoma of theovary. Retrospective study. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 14: 51-55, 1993.
8. Choo, Y. C., and Naylor, B. Multiple primary neoplasms of the ovaryand uterus. hit. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 20: 327-334, 1982.
9. Gitsch, G., Hanzal, E., Jensen, D., and Hacker, N. F. Endometrialcancer in premenopausal women 45 years and younger. Obstet. Gy-necol., 85: 504-508, 1995.
10. Li, J., Yen, C., Liaw, D., Podsypanina, K., Bose, S., Wang, S., Puc,J., Miliaresis, C., Rodgers, L., McCombie, R., Bigner, S., Giovanella,B., Ittmann, M., Tycko, B., Hibshoosh, H., Wigler, M., and Parsons, R.PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in humanbrain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science (Washington DC), 275:
1943-1947, 1997.
11. Stock, P., Pershouse, M., Jasser, S., Yung, W., Lin, H., Ligon, A.,Langford, L., Baumgard, M., Hattier, T., Davis, T., Frye, C., Hu, R.,Swedlund, B., Teng, D., and Tavtigian, S. Identification of a candidatetumour suppressor gene, MMACJ, at chromosome l0q23.3 that is mu-tated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat. Genet., 15: 356-362, 1997.
12. Guldberg, P., thor Straten, P., Birck, A., Ahrenkiel, V., Kirkin,A. F., and Zeuthen, J. Disruption of the MMACJ/PTEN gene by deletionor mutation is a frequent event in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res., 57:
3660-3663, 1997.
13. Tashiro, H., Blazes, M., Wu, R., Cho, K., Bose, S., Wang, S., Li, J.,Parsons, R., and Ellenson, L. Mutations in PTEN are frequent in endo-
metrial carcinoma but rare in other common gynecological malignan-cies. Cancer Res., 57: 3935-3940, 1997.
14. Rhei, E., Kang, L., Bogomolniy, F., Federici, M. G., Borgen, P. I., andBoyd, J. Mutation analysis of the putative tumor suppressor gene PTEN/
MMACJ in primary breast carcinomas. Cancer Res., 57. 3657-3659, 1997.
15. Forgacs, E., Biesterveld, E., Sekido, Y., Fong, K., Muneer, S.,Wistuba, I., Milchgrub, S., Brezinschek, R., Virmani, A., Gazdar, A.,
and Minna, J. Mutation analysis of the PTEN/MMACI gene in lung
cancer. Oncogene, 17: 1557-1565, 1998.
16. Arch, E. M., Goodman, B. K., Van Wesep, R. A., Liaw, D.,Clarke, K., Parsons, R., McKusick, V. A., and Geraghty, M. T.
Deletion of PTEN in a patient with Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syn-drome suggests allelism with Cowden disease. Am. J. Med. Genet.,71: 489-493, 1997.
17. Dahia, P., Marsh, D., Zheng, Z., Zedenius, J., Komminoth, P., Frisk,
T., Wallin, G., Parsons, R., Longy, M., Larsson, C., and Eng, C. Somaticdeletions and mutations in the Cowden disease gene, PTEN, in sporadicthyroid Tumors. Cancer Res., 57: 4710-47 13, 1997.
18. Marsh, D. J., Dahia, P. L., Zheng, Z., Liaw, D., Parsons, R., Gorlin,R. J., and Eng, C. Germline mutations in PTEN are present in Bannayan-Zonana syndrome. Nat. Genet., 16: 333-334, 1997.
19. Risinger, J., Hayes, A., Berchuck, A., and Barrett, J. PTEN/MMACJmutations in endometrial cancers. Cancer Res., 57: 4736-4738, 1997.
20. Sakurada, A., Suzuki, A., Sato, M., Yamakawa, H., Orikasa, K.,Uyeno, S., Ono, T., Ohuchi, N., Fujimura, S., and Hon. A. Infrequentgenetic alterations of the PTEN/MMACJ gene in Japanese patients withprimary cancers of the breast, lung, pancreas, kidney, and ovary. Jpn. J.
Cancer Res., 88: 1025-1028, 1997.
21. Obata, K., Morland, S. J., Watson, R. H., Hitchcock, A., Chenevix-
Trench, G., Thomas, E. J., and Campbell, I. G. Frequent PTEN/MMACmutations in endometrioid but not serous or mucinous epithelial ovariantumors. Cancer Res., 58: 2095-2097, 1998.
22. Creasman, W. T. Announcement, FIGO stages, revisions. Gynecol.Oncol., 35: 125-127, 1989.
23. Hung, J., Kishimoto, Y., Sugio, K., Virmani, A., Mclntire, D. D.,
Minna, J. D., and Gazdar, A. F. Allele-specific chromosome 3p dde-tions occur at an early stage in the pathogenesis of lung carcinoma.J. Am. Med. Assoc., 273: 1908, 1995.
24. Wistuba, I. I., Behrens, C., Milchgrub, S., Virmani, A. K., Jagirdar,J., Thomas, B., loachim, H. L., Litzky, L. A., Brambilla, E. M., Minna,J. D., and Gazdar, A. F. Comparison of molecular changes in lungcancers in HIV-positive and HIV-indeterminate subjects. J. Am. Med.Assoc., 279: 1554-1559, 1998.
25. Symonds, D. A., Johnson, D. P., and Wheeless, C. R., Jr. Feulgen
cytometry in simultaneous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma. Cancer
(Phila.),61: 2511-2516, 1988.
26. Fujita, M., Enomoto, T., Wada, H., lnoue, M., Okudaira, Y., andShroyer, K. R. Application of clonal analysis. Differential diagnosis forsynchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancers and metastatic
cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 105: 350-359, 1996.
27. Emmert-Buck, M. R., Chuaqui, R., Zhuang, Z., Nogales, F., Liotta,
L. A., and Memo, M. J. Molecular analysis of synchronous uterine andovarian endometrioid tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol., 16: 143-148, 1997.
28. Shenson, D. L., Gallion, H. H., Powell, D. E., and Pierem, M. Loss of
heterozygosity and genomic instability in synchronous endometrioid to-
mors of the ovary and endometrium. Cancer (Phila.), 76: 650-657, 1995.
29. Morrow, C. P., Bundy, B. N., Kurman, R. J., Creasman, W. T.,Heller, P., Homesley, H. D., and Graham, J. E. Relationship betweensurgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and IIcarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.Gynecol. Oncol., 40: 55-65, 199!.
30. Kurman, R. J., Zaino, R. J., and Norris, H. J. Blaustein’s Pathologyof the Female Genital Tract, Ed. 4, pp. 439-486. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1998;4:2577-2583. Clin Cancer Res W M Lin, E Forgacs, D P Warshal, et al. carcinomas.PTEN/MMAC1 gene in synchronous endometrial and ovarian Loss of heterozygosity and mutational analysis of the
Updated version
http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/11/2577
Access the most recent version of this article at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/11/2577To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
on April 4, 2020. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from