long-term bridge performance (ltbp) programsp.bridges.transportation.org/documents/2014...

24
Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program AASHTO SCOBS T-9 Technical Committee June 23, 2014 Columbus, Ohio Sue Lane, P.E. Development and Outreach Engineer Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Federal Highway Administration Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Team Leader & Program Manager Federal Highway Administration Robert Zobel, Ph.D., P.E. Technical and Development Engineer Federal Highway Administration Tom Saad, P.E. Federal Highway Administration

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

14 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program

    AASHTO SCOBS T-9 Technical Committee June 23, 2014 Columbus, Ohio Sue Lane, P.E. Development and Outreach Engineer Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Federal Highway Administration

    Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Team Leader & Program Manager

    Federal Highway Administration Robert Zobel, Ph.D., P.E.

    Technical and Development Engineer Federal Highway Administration

    Tom Saad, P.E. Federal Highway Administration

  • Developmental & Execution Phases

    Identify

    Bridge Performance Issues

    Focus Group Meetings

    Category Issue Decks Untreated Concrete Bridge Decks Decks Treated Concrete Bridge Decks Joints Bridge Deck Joints

    Bearings Bridge Bearings Steel Bridges Coatings for Steel Superstructure Elements

    Concrete Bridges Verify Condition of Strands and Tendons

  • Selection Criteria for Candidate Bridges • Bridge Type:

    ―Steel Multi-Girder Bridge with CIP Deck ―Prestressed Concrete Multi-Girder Bridge with CIP Deck ―Box Girder and Adjacent Box Beam Bridges

    • State Owned (also representative of local bridges) • Eliminate if service under is RR • 10 m ≤ Max Span Length ≤ 50m • Maximum of 4 lanes on bridge • ADT ≤ 50,000 VPD • Built after 1960

  • Bridge Types and Sample Size

    (Most Common Bridges)

    Minimum of 65 Bridges in Each Cluster

  • On-Site Meeting Dates

    Northeast: CT, MA, ME, NH, NY, RI, VT Mid-Atlantic: DC, DE, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV East Central: IN, KY, OH, TN, NC Mid West (Central): IA, IL, MI, MN, WI Gulf Coast: AL, AR, FL, LA, MS, TX Rocky Mountains: CO, ID, MT, NE, SD, UT, WY NW: OR, WA SW: AZ, CA, NV Corridor: GA, KS, OK, MO, ND, NM, SC

    SD (6/14/13)

    OR (3/14/13)

    CA (3/15/13)

    NV (3/20/13) UT

    (6/5/13)

    AZ (3/19/13)

    CO (6/6/13)

    NM (3/7/14)

    TX (2/28/13)

    OK (7/12/13)

    LA (2/25/13)

    MO (7/8/13)

    IL (7/25/13)

    WI (7/26/13)

    MN (3/20/14)

    WA (3/13/13)

    MI (3/21/14)

    IN (4/25/

    13)

    OH (5/3/13)

    PA (9/18/12)

    NY (6/25/13)

    TN 4/23/13)

    MS (2/20/13)

    AL (2/21/13)

    GA (4/29/13)

    SC (5/1/13)

    FL (2/21/13)

    NC (5/2/13)

    VA (10/19/12) MD(10/10/12)

    DC(10/18/12)

    DE(10/17/12)

    ME (4/9/14)

    MA (4/4/14)

    NH (4/8/14) VT

    KY (4/24/13)

    CT (4/2/14) IA (7/22/13)

    WV (10/9/1

    2)

    ID (6/11/13)

    ND (3/19/14)

    NJ(10/16/12)

    MT (6/12/13)

    KS (7/10/13)

    WY (6/4/13)

    NE

    AR (2/19/13)

    RI (4/3/14)

    AK

    HI

    States on-site meetings to be scheduled

  • LTBP Contractors and Tasks • Rutgers University

    Bridge Sampling, Data Collection, Analysis, Protocols, Data Management

    • Pennoni Associates, Inc. Data Collection and Validation, Protocols, Technical Support

    • Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Under Negotiation

    • Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Data Collection

    • Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) Data Analysis, Legacy Data, Bridge Documentation Data Collection

  • Data Collection: Untreated Bridge Decks, Joints, and Bearings

    Contractor Cluster States

    Rutgers Mid-Atlantic Steel; Mid-Atlantic Prestressed Concrete

    DE, NJ, MD, PA, VA, WV (2nd round of testing and additional bridges: July 2014)

    Michael Baker

    Gulf Steel; Gulf Prestressed Concrete

    AL, AR, FL, LA, MS, TX (August 2014)

    PSI Mid-Atlantic Steel, Mid-Atlantic Prestressed Concrete; Mid-Atlantic Concrete Box; NE Steel

    CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV (August 2014)

    Contractor NW Prestressed Concrete; SW Concrete Box

    AZ, CA, NV, OR, WA (August 2014)

  • Bridge Research Condition Index Task Order for Bridge Research Condition Index—Awarded to Pennoni Associates, Inc.

    • Status: Began September 2013

    • Data-Driven Bridge Research Condition Index

    • Takes into Account Reliability of Data

    • Draft of Literature Search Written/Under Review

    • Convened Expert Panel for 1-Day Mtg. on May 19, 2014 in Philadelphia

  • LTBP Program

    Product of LTBP Data-Driven Decision

    Support Life-Cycle Cost Models

    Quantify Benefits of Preservation Strategies

    Enhanced Design, Construction,

    Maintenance & Rehabilitation Practices

    LTBP Bridge Portal

    Protocols Improved and

    Standardized Evaluation Techniques

    NDE and SHM Streamline

    Improved Deterioration and Forecasting Models

    Bridge Practices Timeline

    - Owners - Steel Industry - Concrete Industry

  • LTBP Bridge Portal Status Update • IRB (Investment Review Board) 2-Phase Process

    COMPLETED

    • Transfer of Bridge Portal to FHWA Server for Deployment

    INITIATED

    • Prior to Deployment, Rutgers will Assist with Beta Testing

    • Estimate Beta Testing to Begin Prior to EOY 2014

  • Research Protocols—Identification and Publishing Protocol Designation Protocol Name

    FLD-DC-VI-001 Visual Inspection—Steel Superstructure Deterioration—General

    FLD-DC-VI-002 Visual Inspection—Concrete Deterioration—General

    FLD-DC-VI-003 Visual Inspection—Substructure (General Condition Survey)

    FLD-DC-VI-004 Visual Inspection—Elastomeric Bearings

    FLD-DC-VI-005 Visual Inspection—Pot Bearings

    FLD-DC-VI-006 Visual Inspection—Rocker Bearings

    FLD-DC-VI-007 Visual Inspection—Expansion Joints

    FLD-DC-VI-008 Visual Inspection—Steel Superstructure—Corrosion

    FLD-DC-VI-009 Visual Inspection—Steel Superstructure—Section Loss

    FLD-DC-VI-010 Visual Inspection—Concrete—Abrasion

    FLD-DC-VI-011 Visual Inspection—Concrete—Cracking

    FLD-DC-VI-012 Visual Inspection—Concrete—Spalls and Delamination

  • Research Protocols—Identification and Publishing Protocol Designation Protocol Name

    FLD-DC-VI-013 Visual Inspection—Condition Assessment of Asphalt Overlays

    FLD-DC-VI-014 Visual Inspection—Moisture and Efflorescence

    FLD-DC-VI-015 Visual Inspection—Sulfate Attack of Concrete

    FLD-DC-VI-016 Visual Inspection—Drainage System on Bridge Deck and Approach Slabs

    FLD-DC-VI-017 Visual Inspection—Chain Drag (Deck Delamination Survey)

    FLD-DC-ND-001 NDE—Electrical Resistivity Testing

    FLD-DC-ND-002 NDE—Ground Penetrating Radar Testing for Bridge Decks

    FLD-DC-ND-003 NDE—Half Cell Potential Testing

    FLD-DC-ND-004 NDE—Impact Echo Testing

    FLD-DC-ND-005 NDE—Linear Polarization Resistance

    FLD-DC-ND-006 NDE—Dye Penetrant Testing

    FLD-DC-ND-007 NDE—Ultrasonic Surface Wave Testing (Concrete)

  • Research Protocols—Identification and Publishing Protocol Designation Protocol Name

    FLD-DC-ND-008 NDE—Ultrasonic Testing—Steel Fatigue Cracking

    FLD-DC-MS-001 Physical/Material Testing—Wet Coring (Field Sampling) of Concrete Decks

    FLD-DC-MS-002 Physical/Material Testing—Strength and Static and Dynamic Elastic Moduli of Concrete Cores

    FLD-DC-MS-003 Physical/Material Testing—Resistance to Chloride Penetration (Permeability)

    FLD-DC-MS-004 Physical/Material Testing—Sampling and Testing for Chloride Profiles

  • Bridge Practices Timelines • Beginning with Timelines On: Types of Rebar Used in Concrete Members Changes in Composition of Structural Steel

    • Working with Steel Industry to Develop National Steel Bridge Practices Timeline—Draft Completed

    • Working with Concrete Industry to Develop National Concrete Bridge Practices Timeline—Draft Completed

    • Working with Each State to Create Their Bridge Practices Timeline

  • LTBP Products - Publications LTBP Documents Published: • TechBriefs: FHWA LTBP Workshop to Identify Bridge Substructure

    Performance Issues (Web and Print) LTBP Bridge Performance Primer (Web and Print) FHWA LTBP Industry Day (Web and Print)

    • Newsletters: Newsletters #1, #2, and #3 Published and Online

  • LTBP Products - Publications Coming in Summer 2014: • Report: FHWA LTBP High Priority Bridge Performance Issues

    (Web and Print)

    • TechBrief: FHWA LTBP High Priority Bridge Performance Issues

    (Web and Print)

    • Newsletter: Newsletter #4 (Web and Print)

  • Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12

    Coraopolis, PA Built in 1987 6 Miles East of Pittsburgh Airport 152 ft Two-Span Simple Supported Steel Construction Deck Condition = 6 ADT of 1500, with 5% Trucks

    LTBP Cluster Bridge

  • Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12

    Heidelberg Fire Hall Carnegie, PA

    Scott Christie Deputy Secretary PennDOT Tom Macioce Chief Bridge Engineer PennDOT Louis Ruzzi Bridge Engineer District 11 PennDOT

  • Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12

    Coraopolis, PA

  • Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12

  • Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12

  • RABIT™ Bridge Deck Assessment Tool Commercialization • Infratek • 5 RABIT™ Bridge Deck Assessment Tools • Plan Demonstration to States in Conjunction with Data

    Collection

  • �Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program��Slide Number 2Selection Criteria for Candidate BridgesSlide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6LTBP Contractors and TasksSlide Number 8Bridge Research Condition IndexSlide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Bridge Practices TimelinesLTBP Products - PublicationsLTBP Products - PublicationsPennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12Pennsylvania DOT Demonstration - June 11 & 12RABIT™ Bridge Deck Assessment ToolSlide Number 24