8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 1/17

Lok Adalats And Permanent Lok Adalats

A Scope For Judicial Review ?

A Critical Study  Chat with us

Karthyaeni.V and Vidhi Bhatt 

ntroduction:

. Lok Adalats in India 

ADR has been an integral part of our historical past. Like the zero, the concept of Lok Adalat (Peoples' Court) is an innovative Indian

ontribution to the world jurisprudence. The institution of Lok Adalat in India, as the very name suggests, means, People's Court."Lok" sta

or "people" and the vernacular meaning of the term "Adalat" is the court. India has a long tradition and history of such methods being prac

n the society at grass roots level. These are called panchayat and in the legal terminology, these are called arbitration. These are widely use

ndia for resolution of disputes ? both commercial and non-commercial. Other alternative methods being used are Lok Adalat (People's Cou

where justice is dispensed summarily without too much emphasis on legal technicalities. It has been proved to be a very effective alternativ

tigation. 

he ancient concept of settlement of dispute through mediation, negotiation or through arbitral process known as "Peoples' Court verdict" o

ecision of "Nyaya-Panch" is conceptualized and institutionalized in the philosophy of Lok Adalat. Some people equate Lok Adalat to

onciliation or mediation, some treat it with negotiations and arbitration. Those who find it different from all these, call it "Peoples' Court".

nvolves people who are directly or indirectly affected by dispute resolution. 

he salient features of this form of dispute resolution are participation, accommodation, fairness, expectation, voluntariness, neighbourlines

ransparency, efficiency and lack of animosity. 

he concept of Lok Adalats was pushed back into oblivion in last few centuries before independence and particularly during the British reg

Now, this concept has, once again, been rejuvenated. It has, once again, become very popular and familiar amongst litigants. This is the sys

which has deep roots in Indian legal history and its close allegiance to the culture and perception of justice in Indian ethos. Experience has

hown that it is one of the very efficient and important ADRs and most suited to the Indian environment, culture and societal interests. 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 2/17

Camps of Lok Adalats were started initially in Gujarat in March 1982 and now it has been extended throughout the Country. 

he evolution of this movement was a part of the strategy to relieve heavy burden on the Courts with pending cases and to give relief to the

tigants who were in a queue to get justice. The first Lok Adalat was held on March 14, 1982 at Junagarh in Gujarat the land of Mahatma

Gandhi. Lok Adalats have been very successful in settlement of motor accident claim cases, matrimonial/family disputes, labourdisputes,

isputes relating to public services such as telephone, electricity, bank recovery cases and so on. 

ome statistics may give us a feeling of tremendous satisfaction and encouragement. Up to the middle of last year (2004), more than 200,00

ok Adalats have been held and therein more than16 million cases have been settled, half of which were motor accident claim cases. More

ne billion US dollars were distributed by way of compensation to those who had suffered accidents. 6.7 million persons have benefited

hrough legal aid and advice. 

he Statistics of the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority as to the number of cases disposed, the amount of compensation paid etc have b

nnexed herewith. 

.1 Legislation pertaining to Lok Adalats 

he advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article

A of the Constitution of India, contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. It is an Act to constitute legal serv

uthorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society to ensure that opportunities for securing justice

ot denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities, and to organize Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal

ystem promotes justice on a basis of equal opportunity. Even before the enforcement of the Act, the concept of Lok Adalat has been gettin

wide acceptance as People's Courts as the very name signifies. Settlement of disputes at the hands of Panchayat Heads or tribal heads was i

ogue since ancient times. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by

ok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court which can be executed as a civil court decree. 

.2 Procedure at Lok Adalat:

The procedure followed at a Lok Adalat is very simple and shorn of almost all legal formalism and rituals. The Lok Adalat is presided ove

sitting or retired judicial officer as the chairman, with two other members, usually a lawyer and a social worker. It is revealed by experien

hat in Lok Adalats it is easier to settle money claims since in most such cases the quantum alone may be in dispute. Thus the motor accide

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 3/17

ompensation claim cases are brought before the Lok Adalat and a number of cases were disposed of in each Lok Adalat. One important

ondition is that both parties in dispute should agree for settlement through Lok Adalat and abide by its decision. A Lok Adalat has the

urisdiction to settle, by way of effecting compromise between the parties, any matter which may be pending before any court, as well as

matters at pre-litigative stage i.e. disputes which have not yet been formally instituted in any Court of Law. Such matters may be civil or

riminal in nature, but any matter relating to an offence not compoundable under any law cannot be decided by the Lok Adalat even if the

arties involved therein agree to settle the same. Lok Adalats can take cognizance of matters involving not only those persons who are entit

o avail free legal services but of all other persons also, be they women, men, or children and even institutions. Anyone, or more of the part

o a dispute can move an application to the court where their matter may be pending, or even at pre-litigative stage, for such matter being ta

p in the Lok Adalat whereupon the Lok Adalat Bench constituted for the purpose shall attempt to resolve the dispute by helping the partie

rrive at an amicable solution and once it is successful in doing so, the award passed by it shall be final which has as much force as a decre

Civil Court obtained after due contest. 

.3 Finality of Lok Adalat award:

One issue which raises its head often is the finality of the award of the Lok Adalat. During the Lok Adalat, the parties agree to abide by the

ecision of the judge at the Lok Adalat. However, it is often seen that later, the same order is challenged on several grounds. In one of the

ecent decisions, the Supreme Court of India has once again laid to rest all such doubts. In unequivocal terms, the Court has held that award

he Lok Adalat is as good as the decree of a Court. The award of the Lok Adalat is fictionally deemed to be decrees of Court and therefore t

ourts have all the powers in relation thereto as it has in relation to a decree passed by itself. This, includes the powers to extend time in

ppropriate cases. The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the court itself though arrived at by the simpler method of concili

nstead of the process of arguments in court. 

.4 Consent of Parties 

he most important factor to be considered while deciding the cases at the Lok Adalat is the consent of both the parties. It can not be forced

ny party that the matter has to be decided by the Lok Adalat. However, once the parties agree that the matter has to be decided by the Lok 

Adalat, then any party cannot walk away from the decision of the Lok Adalat. In several instances, the Supreme Court has held that if there

o consent the award of the Lok Adalat is not executable and also if the parties fail to agree to get the dispute resolved through Lok Adalat

egular litigation process remains open for the contesting parties. 

he Supreme Court has also held that compromise implies some element of accommodation on each side. It is not apt to describe it as total

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 4/17

urrender. 

A compromise is always bilateral and means mutual adjustment. Settlement is termination of legal proceedings by mutual consent. If no

ompromise or settlement is or could be arrived at, no order can be passed by the Lok Adalat. 

.5 Benefits of Lok Adalat 

he benefits that litigants derive through the Lok Adalats are many. # First, there is no court fee and even if the case is already filed in the

egular court, the fee paid will be refunded if the dispute is settled at the Lok Adalat. 

Secondly, there is no strict application of the procedural laws and the Evidence Act while assessing the merits of the claim by the Lok 

Adalat. The parties to the disputes though represented by their advocate can interact with the Lok Adalat judge directly and explain their sta

n the dispute and the reasons therefore, which is not possible in a regular court of law. 

Thirdly, disputes can be brought before the Lok Adalat directly instead of going to a regular court first and then to the Lok Adalat.? Four

he decision of the Lok Adalat is binding on the parties to the dispute and its order is capable of execution through legal process. No appeal

gainst the order of the Lok Adalat whereas in the regular law courts there is always a scope to appeal to the higher forum on the decision o

rial court, which causes delay in the settlement of the dispute finally. The reason being that in a regular court, decision is that of the court b

ok Adalat it is mutual settlement and hence no case for appeal will arise. In every respect the scheme of Lok Adalat is a boon to the litigan

ublic, where they can get their disputes settled fast and free of cost. 

Last but not the least, faster and inexpensive remedy with legal status. 

he system has received laurels from the parties involved in particular and the public and the legal functionaries, in general. It also helps in

mergence of jurisprudence of peace in the larger interest of justice and wider sections of society. Its process is voluntary and works on the

rinciple that both parties to the disputes are willing to sort out their disputes by amicable solutions. Through this mechanism, disputes can

ettled in a simpler, quicker and cost-effective way at all the three stages i.e. pre-litigation, pending-litigation and post-litigation. 

Overall effect of the scheme of the Lok Adalat is that the parties to the disputes sit across the table and sort out their disputes by way of 

onciliation in presence of the Lok Adalat Judges, who would be guiding them on technical legal aspects of the controversies. 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 5/17

he scheme also helps the overburdened Court to alleviate the burden of arrears of cases and as the award becomes final and binding on bo

he parties, no appeal is filed in the Appellate Court and, as such, the burden of the Appellate Court in hierarchy is also reduced. The schem

ot only helpful to the parties, but also to the overburdened Courts to achieve the constitutional goal of speedy disposal of the cases. About

f the cases filed in the developed countries are settled mutually by conciliation, mediation etc. and, as such, only 10% of the cases are deci

y the Courts there. In our country, which is developing, has unlike the developed countries, number of Judges disproportionate to the case

led and, hence, to alleviate the accumulation of cases, the Lok Adalat is the need of the day. 

. Permanent Lok Adalats 

During the last few years Lok Adalat has been found to be a successful tool of alternate dispute resolution in India. It is most popular and

ffective because of its innovative nature and inexpensive style. The system received wide acceptance not only from the litigants, but from

ublic and legal functionaries in general. In India, during the last few years Lok Adalat has been functioning continuously and permanently

very district centre. In taluk centres also sittings of Lok Adalats have been held successfully. Several thousands of pending cases and dispu

which had not reached law courts have been settled through Lok Adalats. 

he major defect of the mechanism of Lok Adalat is that it cannot take a decision, if one of the parties, is not willing for a settlement, thoug

he case involves an element of settlement. The adamant attitude shown by one among the parties will render the entire process futile. Even

ll the members of the Lok Adalat are of the opinion that the case is a fit one for settlement, under the present set-up, they cannot take a

ecision unless all the parties consent. 

n his inaugural address at the second annual meet of the State Legal Services Authorities, 1999, the then Hon'ble Chief Justice Dr A.S. An

iring him views stated thus: 

There will be no harm if Legal Services Authorities Act is suitably amended to provide that in case, in a matter before it, the Judges of the

Adalats are satisfied that one of the parties is unreasonably opposing a reasonable settlement and has no valid defence whatsoever against th

laim of the opposite party, they may pass an award on the basis of the materials before them without the consent of one or more parties. It

lso be provided that against such awards, there would be one appeal to the court to which the appeal would have gone if the matter had be

ecided by a court.... This course, I think, would give relief to a very large number of litigants coming to Lok Adalats at prelitigative stage

well as in pending matters." 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 6/17

n 2002, Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The said amendment introduced Chapt

VI-A with the caption PRE LITIGATION CONCILIATION AND SETTLEMENT. Section 22-B envisages establishment of "PERMANEN

OK ADALATS (PLA)" at different places for considering the cases in respect of Public Utility Services (PUS). 

f there is a dispute with respect to PUS, as per Section 22-C(1), any party to such a dispute can, before bringing it to a court of law for

djudication, make an application to PLA for the settlement of that dispute. The party making such application need not be a party who rais

laim against a public utility service. If a claim is made by one against a public utility service, the establishment carrying out the public util

ervice can also raise that dispute before PLA to resolve it. The only limitation is that PLA shall not have jurisdiction to consider a dispute

elating to an offence not compoundable under any law or any matter where the value of the property in dispute exceeds Rs 10 lakhs. But th

Central Government can, by an appropriate notification, increase this limit. Once an application has been made to PLA by one party, no par

hat application shall invoke the jurisdiction of any court in the same dispute. 

LA has to be established by the National Legal Services Authority or the State Legal Services Authorities. It shall have three members; th

Chairman, who is or has been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge or has held a judicial office higher in rank than that of a Distr

udge and two other members having adequate experience in public utility service. Such persons shall be appointed by the State or the Cent

Authority, as the case may be, upon nomination by the respective Governments. But at the same time, such nomination shall be on the

ecommendation of the Central or the State Authority. Section 22-C(3) provides that when an application is filed raising a dispute, the parti

hall be directed to file written statements with appropriate proof, including documents and other evidence. Copies of documents produced

tatements made by the parties shall be given to each other. Thereafter PLA shall conduct conciliation proceedings between the parties to b

bout an amicable settlement to the dispute. It is the primary duty of PLA as per Section 22-C(4). While conducting such conciliation

roceedings, it is incumbent on the members of PLA to assist the parties to reach an amicable settlement. 

he parties are also obliged to cooperate in good faith with PLA. If PLA is of the opinion that "there exist elements of settlement in such

roceedings, which may be acceptable to the parties", it shall formulate the terms of possible settlement, communicate its observations to th

arties and if the parties agree, the settlement shall be signed and an award shall be passed in terms of such settlement and copies of the aw

hall be furnished to the parties. See Section 22-C(7). It is also provided in sub-section (8) that in cases where there exist elements of 

ettlement, but the parties fail to reach at an agreement, "the Permanent Lok Adalat shall, if the dispute does not relate to any offence, decid

he dispute". "For the purpose of holding any determination" the Permanent Lok Adalat shall have the same powers as are vested in a civil c

nder the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 while trying a suit, in respect of summoning and enforcing of attendance and examining of witnes

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 7/17

iscovery or production of documents, reception of evidence on affidavits, requisitioning of public records and documents and such other

matter as the Government may prescribe. PLA can specify its own procedure for deciding the dispute coming before it and the proceedings

hall be deemed to be judicial proceedings. The award of PLA, whether made on merit or on settlement shall be final and binding on partie

e deemed to be a decree of a civil court. It shall be executed as if it is a decree of a civil court having jurisdiction in respect of the dispute

nvolved. But the award cannot be called in question in any "original suit, application or execution proceedings". This, in effect, is the sche

f the amendment establishing a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA). 

his will, certainly, prove to be very effective, litigant-friendly and less-expensive mechanism to resolve certain serious disputes. As PUS a

endered mainly by corporate bodies, this virtually will be a forum for ordinary men and women to ventilate their grievances against such

orporate bodies. In the changing economic scenario of the country where insurance, communication and other services are thrown open to

orporate giants, it is all the more necessary to provide for cost-effective and delay-free tools for resolution of disputes. PLA is a structured

lubbing conciliatory mode with certain features of arbitration to arrive at decisions under given circumstances. There is sharp criticism aga

his machinery both in its constitution and its functioning especially from lawyers. The main opposition against the amendment is based on

ollowing viz. (1) with regard to the constitution of PLA; (2) insofar as PLA is given the power to decide a dispute unlike the ordinary Lok

Adalats (LA) envisaged as per Section 19 of the Act which only conciliates the dispute; and (3) absence of provision for appeal against the

ecision of PLA. 

t is submitted that there is no basis for these criticisms. As the Government is nominating the members, there may be political consideratio

heir appointment, it is said. It is true that the members of PLA shall be nominated by the respective Governments. But such nomination sh

e, in terms of Section 22-B(2)(b) of the Act, on recommendation by the Legal Services Authority concerned. After such nomination, they

o be appointed by the Legal Services Authority concerned. So there is no chance for the Government's nominee getting appointed. 

here is a Central Authority called the "National Legal Services Authority". Its patron is the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India. Its Executive

Chairman is the seniormost Judge of the Supreme Court of India. Two among the members are two Chairmen of the State Legal Services

Authorities who are invariably sitting Judges of the High Courts concerned. Another member is the Secretary of the Department of Legal

Affairs and there is a Member Secretary who is a District Judge. Apart from that, there are members like the Secretary, Department of 

xpenditure, and members appointed by the Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India. Those persons shall be eminent

ersons in the field of law or persons of repute in the legal services schemes or eminent social workers. 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 8/17

o far as the State Legal Services Authorities are concerned, it is headed by a Patron-in-Chief who is none other than the Hon'ble Chief Jus

f the High Court. In almost all the State Authorities, except perhaps one or two, a sitting Judge of the High Court functions as the Executiv

Chairman. A District Judge functions as the Member Secretary. 

o far as Kerala is concerned, the other members are the Registrar of the High Court, the Advocate-General, the Director General of 

rosecutions, the Chairman of the Bar Council of Kerala, President of the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association, the Law Secretary, th

inance Secretary, Director of Health Services, Director General of Police, Chairman, Kerala State Women's Commission and persons havi

pecial knowledge and practical experience in social service etc. Other State Authorities also have similar constitution. It is these authoritie

with such eminent personalities which shall recommend the names of the members of PLA. It is a body consisting of the Chief Justice of th

High Court and a sitting Judge who is the Executive Chairman of the State Authority, which consists of eminent persons in the legal field th

ecommends such members. Members so recommended shall have to be nominated by the Government. The members so nominated shall h

o be appointed by the authority concerned as members of PLA. It cannot be taken that the members so recommended by the authority shal

n political consideration or incompetent to function as members of PLA. It cannot be taken that a body consisting of the Chief Justice and

itting Judge or retired Judge and other persons with the status of a District Judge and Advocate-General, Chairman of Bar Council etc. wil

ecommend incompetent persons to be members of PLA. These respectable persons, it is hoped, will always recommend only competent

ersons. It cannot be presupposed that these respectable bodies consisting of very eminent persons will recommend incompetent incumbent

here is criticism that the persons so appointed will not have legal background. Presently, the specialised tribunals are appointed with t he

epresentatives of social organisations or experts. In the case of machineries set up to try disputes raised by consumers, members other than

Chairman are persons without legal background. Even in administrative tribunals, persons without legal background, but only with

dministrative experience are appointed as members. Along with persons with judicial background experts or experienced persons without

ackground are also appointed in other alternative dispute redressal forums. 

he second criticism is with regard to the functioning of PLA insofar as it is given the power to decide a dispute when the parties do not ag

or a settlement. While deciding the dispute, it is made clear that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Indian Evidence Ac

ot have application. In other words, the determination or decisions will be in a summary manner. As already mentioned above, PLA is giv

mple power in the matter of reception of evidence, examination of witnesses etc. the power that a civil court has. A decision is possible on

hose cases where in the opinion of the Permanent Lok Adalat "there exist elements of settlement". In such cases, PLA formulates the terms

ossible settlement and gives such terms to the parties concerned for their observations. These observations will be considered on the basis

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 9/17

vidence produced by the parties. If they do not come to a settlement, PLA shall decide the dispute. That means, PLA is not given the powe

ecide every dispute coming before it. Only those disputes where there exist elements of settlement can be decided by the Permanent Lok 

Adalat. The decision or the opinion of the Permanent Lok Adalat as to whether there exist elements of settlement is also a matter which can

ubjected to judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, there shall be a check in that respect as well. 

t is further ensured in the Act that while deciding the dispute on merit, PLA shall be guided by the "principles of natural justice, objectivity

air play, equity and other principles of justice". Thus, a fair procedure is always envisaged. Therefore, there is no reason for any criticism o

he power granted to PLA to decide the dispute in the event of a settlement not being arrived at despite the existence of an element of 

ettlement. 

t cannot be said that there is no appeal against the decision of PLA. So far as the ordinary Lok Adalats (LA) are concerned which

xistence even prior to the amendment and is still being continued no appeal will lie against an award of that Lok Adalat. The ordin

LA adopts only a conciliatory method and does not decide a dispute. Therefore, disputes are settled on consent of the parties. When

ispute is settled based on consent, no appeal need lie from any such order or award even if there is a settlement in court. Under th

ivil procedure law also no appeal shall lie from a decree passed on consent of the parties. This is the reason the Act declares that "

ppeal shall lie to any court against the award" of ordinary Lok Adalat (LA) envisaged in Chapter VI of the Act. 

ut the award of Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) envisaged in the newly introduced Chapter VI-A is different. If it is an award upon

onsent of parties and is as a result of compromise, necessarily, nobody will think of an appeal. When there is a decision by PLA, as

arties did not agree for a compromise, it is possible that the aggrieved party may think of an appeal. Every award of the Permane

Lok Adalat, whether it is based on consent of the parties, or on compromise or upon the decision, "shall be deemed to be a decree o

ivil court". Thus the decision taken by PLA will have all the attributes of a decree of a civil court. It will be taken and considered i

espects, as a decree of a civil court. Every decree, unless it is appealed against and so long as it is allowed to continue, will be final

inding on the parties. Same is the case of an award of PLA. It is true that there is no provision for appeal. But appeal is not expres

xcluded, in the case of award of PLAs. It is not stated anywhere in the Act that an award of a PLA shall not be cal led in question i

ny appeal, as is done in the case of the award of an ordinary Lok Adalat (LA) in Section 21(2) of the Act. 

Certainly, appeal will lie only if it is provided somewhere by law. Otherwise, one cannot file an appeal. It seems that the p rovision o

ection 96(1) CPC could be relied on to establish that an appeal is not excluded. As already mentioned above, the award of PLA ha

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 10/17

he attributes of a civil court decree and it is deemed as a decree of a civil court. Section 96(1) of the Code o f Civil Procedure, 1908

rovides: 

ave where otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie

rom every decree passed by any court exercising original jurisdiction to the court authorized to hear appeals from the decisions of

uch court." When the award of PLA is treated as a decree of civil court and as it is not otherwise provided in the Legal Services

Authorities Act that no appeal shall lie from such award, necessarily, that being deemed a civil court decree, an appeal shall lie from

hat decree. 

An award of PLA shall be executed by a civil court "having local jurisdiction" depending upon the amount of the decree. Necessarily, an ap

hall also lie to a court depending upon the quantum of the amount involved in the decree or to the High Court being a decision of a body

onsisting of three persons of which a District Judge or a retired District Judge is the Chairman. So there is possibility for a judicial review

ppeal. 

n the case of the awards of ordinary Lok Adalat (LA), the statute specifically provides that it shall not be challenged in an appeal.

he very same legislature did not legislate such a provision when it dealt with the award of PLA. The manifest difference in the

rovisions relating to the awards of PLA and LA is not accidental. The difference really means that an appeal is possible against an

ward of PLA in terms of Section 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, when it is not specifically barred by the Legal Services

Authorities Act, 1987 and as the award has all the attributes of a decree of a civil court. Even otherwise, the jurisdiction under Arti

26 of the Constitution of India cannot be ruled out, being one among the basic features of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the

riticism that the award of PLA cannot be called in question in a higher forum has no force. Moreover, PLA is a machinery to settl

ecide disputes relating to public utility services. In the changing economic scenario, the establishments rendering public utility

ervices, enumerated in the Act might be run by corporate sectors. Common people may have claims against these corporates. If th

re given a speedy and inexpensive remedy to resolve their grievances, it should be welcomed. 

awyers can very well apprise the client of the demerits, if any, of the machinery of PLA. In spite of that, if the party is inclined to resort to

heaper remedy, it cannot be said that the legislation is antilitigant, as there is no compulsion that one shall first approach PLA before

pproaching a court of law. 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 11/17

Of course, as already mentioned, the party other than the claimant also can raise the dispute before PLA and it is likely that PLA may rende

ecision, if no settlement is arrived at, in spite of the existence of elements of settlement. Thus an award may come against a person who re

id not desire to avail of this remedy in respect of his claims. In such circumstances, he can either resort to an appeal, or at any rate, to

roceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It cannot be argued that the members of PLA will be biased in their decision and

hat they may even defeat the decision of the Chairman by forming a majority on extraneous considerations. Even if it happens so in a rare

ituation, certainly it can be corrected either in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or in an appeal as mentioned abo

here shall be some definite qualifications for the other members of PLA. Presently what is required is that they shall have "adequate

xperience in public utility service". This is too vague a phraseology. It is always advisable to spell out definite qualifications, so that the

tigants will have confidence that the persons deciding their disputes are sufficiently qualified and able. 

As already mentioned above, it is possible, if somebody raises a claim against public utility services, the latter can bring that dispute before

LA. PLA may take some time to render a decision. In case no compromise is arrived at, and if the case involves no element of settlement

will happen, if in the meantime the period of limitation is over, so far as the claimant party is concerned Can it be taken t hat he has been

prosecuting with due diligence in civil proceedings" in a court Because, so far as PLA is concerned, he was not the party initiating the dis

he Lok Adalat is not treated as a court, but only vested with certain powers of a civil court or shall be deemed to be a civil court for the

urpose of Section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. These aspects require consideration. 

. Scope For Judicial Review

A Critical Study 

Objective of Lok Adalat is to settle the disputes which are pending before the courts, by negotiations, conciliation and by adopting persuasi

ommonsense and humane approach to the problems of the disputants. 

he large population of India and the illiterate masses have found the regular dispensation of justice through regular courts very cumbersom

nd ineffective. The special conditions prevailing in the Indian society and due to the economic structure, highly sensitized legal service is

equired which is efficacious for the poor and ignorant masses. The Lok Adalat movement is no more an experiment in India. It is now a

uccess and but needs to be replicated in certain matters. 

n this chapter the researchers have tried to arrive at whether there is any need for a judicial review in the current status and scenario of Lok

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 12/17

Adalats with the necessary critical study over the matter with possible solutions and suggestions as and when needed. 

As aforesaid in the objective of the Lok Adalats, the intention of the legislator has been to put an end to the disputes summarily and reduce

urden of the courts. Therefore, the Lok Adalats decide the matters on a consent/ compromise basis. The Lok Adalat passes the award after

arties have agreed on the settlement and have given consent over it. 

he Lok Adalat will passes the award with the consent of the parties, therefore there is no need either to reconsider or review the matter aga

nd again, as the award passed by the Lok Adalat shall be final. Even as under Section 96 of C.P.C. that "no appeal shall lie from a decree

assed by the Court with the consent of the parties". The award of the Lok Adalat is an order by the Lok Adalat under the consent of the pa

nd it shall be deemed to be a decree of the Civil Court, therefore an appeal shall not lie from the award of the Lok Adalat as under Section

C.P.C. 

n Punjab National Bank v. Lakshmichand Rai ( AIR 2000 MP 301) the High Court held that "The provisions of the Act shall pre

n the matter of filing an appeal and an appeal would not lie under the provisions of Section 96 C.P.C. Lok Adalat is conducted under an

ndependent enactment and once the award is made by Lok Adalat the right of appeal shall be governed by the provisions of the Legal Serv

Authorities Act when it has been specifically barred under Provisions of Section 21(2), no appeal c an be filed against the award under Sect

6 C.P.C." The Court further stated that "It may incidentally be further seen that even the Code of Civil Procedure does not provide f

n appeal under Section 96 against a consent decree. The Code of Civil Procedure also intends that once a consent decree is passed

Civil Court finality is attached to it. Such finality cannot be permitted to be destroyed, particularly under the Legal Services

Authorities Act, as it would amount to defeat the very aim and object of the Act with which it has been enacted, hence, we hold that

ppeal filed is not maintainable. 

he High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that, in Board of Trustees of the Port of Visakhapatnam v. Presiding Officer, Permanent, Lok Adal

he award is enforceable as a decree and it is final. The endeavour is only to see that the disputes are narrowed down and make the final

ettlement so that the parties are not again driven to further litigation or any dispute. Though the award of a Lok Adalat is not a result of a

ontest on merits just as a regular suit by a Court on a regular suit by a Court on a regular trial, however, it is as equal and on par with a dec

n compromise and will have the same binding effect and conclusive just as the decree passed on the compromises cannot be challenged in

egular appeal. 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 13/17

The truth is, a judgment by consent is intended to put a stop to litigation between the parties just as much as is a judgment which results fr

he decision of the Court after the matter has been fought out to the end. And I think it would be very mischievous if one were not to give a

nd reasonable interpretation to such judgments, and were to allow questions that were really involved in the action to be fought over again

ubsequent action." 

o the like effect are the following observations of the Judicial Committee in - 'Kinch v. Walvott', :-

First of all their Lordships are clear that in relation to this plea of estoppel it is of no advantage to the appellant that the order in the libel ac

which is said to raise it was consent order. For such a purpose and order by consent, not discharged by mutual agreement, and remaining

nreduced, is as effective as an order of the Court made otherwise than by consent and not discharged on appeal." 

On this authority it becomes absolutely clear that the consent order is as effective as an order passed on contest, not only with reference to t

onclusion arrived at in the previous suit but also with regard to every step in the process of reasoning on which the said conclusion is foun

When we say "every step in the reasoning" we mean the findings on the essential facts on which the judgment or the ultimate conclusion w

ounded. In other words the finding which it was necessary to arrive at for the purpose of sustaining the judgment in the particular case will

perate as estoppel by judgment. 

n all the above judgments, it has clearly been laid down that, a matter of consent decree need not go on an appeal. However, the power of 

udicial review in a given case is implicit under the Constitution unless expressly excluded by a provision of the Constitution. This power i

vailable to correct any order passed by a statutory authority which is violative of any of the provisions of the statute. The Lok Adalat is a

reation of statute and gets jurisdiction from it and hence this Court is competent to go into an order passed by it, to decide whether the ord

uestion is valid in law. The writ jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be circumscribed by provisions of any enactment as is to be found in

ection 21 of the Act and it can always exercise its jurisdiction if an order, left alone, would amount to abrogating the rule of law. 

he question of appeal and judicial review in the case of a PLA is however different. It cannot be said that there is no appeal against the

ecision of PLA. So far as the ordinary Lok Adalats (LA) are concerned which is in existence even prior to the amendment and is still bein

ontinued no appeal will lie against an award of that Lok Adalat. The ordinary LA adopts only a conciliatory method and does not decide a

ispute. Therefore, disputes are settled on consent of the parties. When a dispute is settled based on consent, no appeal need lie from any su

rder or award even if there is a settlement in court. Under the civil procedure law also no appeal shall lie from a decree passed on consent

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 14/17

he parties. This is the reason the Act declares that "no appeal shall lie to any court against the award" of ordinary Lok Adalat (LA) envisag

Chapter VI of the Act. 

ut the award of Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) envisaged in the newly introduced Chapter VI-A is different. If it is an award upon consent

arties and is as a result of compromise, necessarily, nobody will think of an appeal. When there is a decision by PLA, as the parties did no

gree for a compromise, it is possible that the aggrieved party may think of an appeal. Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat, whether i

ased on consent of the parties, or on compromise or upon the decision, "shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court". Thus the decision

aken by PLA will have all the attributes of a decree of a civil court. It will be taken and considered in all respects, as a decree of a civil cou

very decree, unless it is appealed against and so long as it is allowed to continue, will be final and binding on the parties. Same is the case

n award of PLA. It is true that there is no provision for appeal. But appeal is not expressly excluded, in the case of award of PLAs. It is no

tated anywhere in the Act that an award of a PLA shall not be called in question in any appeal, as is done in the case of the award of an

rdinary Lok Adalat (LA) in Section 21(2) of the Act. 

Certainly, appeal will lie only if it is provided somewhere by law. Otherwise, one cannot file an appeal. It seems that the provision of Sectio

6(1) CPC could be relied on to establish that an appeal is not excluded. As already mentioned above, the award of PLA has all the attribut

civil court decree and it is deemed as a decree of a civil court. Section 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 provides: 

ave where otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie from e

ecree passed by any court exercising original jurisdiction to the court authorized to hear appeals from the decisions of such court. When t

ward of PLA is treated as a decree of civil court and as it is not otherwise provided in the Legal Services Authorities Act that no appeal sh

e from such award, necessarily, that being deemed a civil court decree, an appeal shall lie from that decree. 

An award of PLA shall be executed by a civil court "having local jurisdiction" depending upon the amount of the decree. Necessarily, an ap

hall also lie to a court depending upon the quantum of the amount involved in the decree or to the High Court being a decision of a body

onsisting of three persons of which a District Judge or a retired District Judge is the Chairman. So there is possibility for a judicial review

ppeal. 

n the case of the awards of ordinary Lok Adalat (LA), the statute the very same legislature did not legislate such a provision when it dealt w

he award of PLA. The manifest difference in the provisions relating to the awards of PLA and LA is not accidental. The difference really

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 15/17

means that an appeal is possible against an award of PLA in terms of Section 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, when it is not specifical

arred by the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and as the award has all the attributes of a decree of a civil court. Even otherwise, the

urisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be ruled out, being one among the basic features of the Constitution of Ind

herefore, the criticism that the award of PLA cannot be called in question in a higher forum has no force. 

he question of appeal in case of Lok Adalat and Permanent Lok Adalat is therefore clear. The whole intention of the legislator has been to

rovide for a finality of the proceedings since the matters were to be settled on a compromise basis. 

here is always the scope to go for a writ petition to challenge the award in case of any grave illegality. The probability of fraud,

misrepresentation, force etc while arriving at the consent or compromise cannot be ruled out. There is again a chance that the one of the par

may not be in a position to understand the nature of the legality of the proceedings and an award has been passed due to the sheer negligenc

he judge. 

he likelihood of such events cannot be ruled out. In Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat, it was held that; The duty of the C

s to confine itself to the question of legality. Its concern should be, (i) whether the decision-making authority exceeded its powers?; (ii)

ommitted an error of law; (iii) committed a breach of the rules of natural justice; (iv) reached a decision which no reasonable Tribunal wou

ave reached; or (v) abused its powers. In the case on hand the Lok Adalat exceeded its powers, committed an error of law, committed brea

f the rules of natural justice and abused its powers. Even if this Court were to strictly confine itself to the question of legality, the impugne

rder cannot still be tolerated as it suffers from all the foibles that justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. 

he Karnataka State Bar Council was opposed to the section in the Act which said if one party approached the permanent Lok Adalat, the o

arty had no option but to participate in the litigation. This was opposed to the canons of justice, the lawyers said. "The right of judicial rev

r appeal is fundamental in all legal matters and making the decision of the permanent Lok Adalats final, without the right of appeal, will v

nrestricted power in the hands of a tribunal in which two non-officials can dominate... it will impair the administration of justice,'' they sai

n Election Commission of India v. Union of India and Ors., the Apex Court while dealing with the powers of the Court under the Constitu

o interfere with an order passed by the Election Commission, laid down: "There are no unreviewable discretions under the constitutional

ispensation. The overall constitutional function to ensure that constitutional authorities function within the sphere of their respective

onstitutional authority is that of the Courts". The enunciation by the Apex Court making even an order by a constitutional authority review

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 16/17

hould leave no doubt in any one's mind that a discretion exercised by a statutory authority would be well-within the reviewable discretion

his Court. 

N.L.Rajag, President of Concumer Courts, Bar Association also pointed out that Permanent Lok Adalats do perform and can perform inval

ervice as conciliators or mediators. But then to tell parties that even if they do not agree to settle the matter the Lok Adalat would go ahead

ass a decree which will then be binding on them, is horrendously arbitrary and unreasonable. 

ut one tends to forget the forum of judicial review is always open for the parties through the writ petitions. This is a bas ic feature of the

Constitution and cannot be ruled out. Denial of it would be unfair and unwarranted. 

he ultimate result would be that all these matters will come knocking at the doors of the High Court, thus suffocating an already overloade

High Court.

________________________________________

ignificance of Lok Adalats in present scenario: The topic of the assignment paper is "Significance of Lok Adalats in present scenario" and

eals with the very question of the applicability of Lok Adalats..... 

ok Adalat & Perspective of Paribarik Mahila Lok Adalat: Lok Adalat now is playing sole role in solving disputes and settling MACT

ases...... 

ok Adalats: The concept of Lok Adalats was pushed back into oblivion in last few centuries before independence and particularly during t

ritish regime....... 

ignificance Of Lok Adalat

Camps of Lok Adalat were started initially in Gujarat in March 1982 and now it has been extended.... 

More Articles: 

We offer Copyright Registration Services

Right from your Desktop..... 

8/3/2019 Lokadalat Legal India

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lokadalat-legal-india 17/17

CPC, Evidence Law, LBA & Property Law

Significance Of Lok Adalat

Public Interest Litigation

Legal Aid 

Ask Our legal Experts, on issues related to

Divorce Click Here 

Find A lawyer: Delhi - Kolkata - Mumbai - Chennai - Bangalore - Hyderabad - Allahabad - Pune - Ahmedabad - Nagpur -

Cochin - Chandigarh - Gurgaon - Jaipur - Ludhiana 

The author can be reached at: karthyaeni@legalserviceindia.com /  Print This Article 

Home | Supreme Court Judgments | Legal Forms | legal advice | Lawyers | Add A Link | Terms of 

use | Advertise | F A Q | Sitemap |Contact Us