lod in digital libraries - current issues

29
Ansgar Scherp [email protected] FG Datenbanken March 2014 Braunschweig LOD in Digital Libraries - Current Issues

Upload: others

Post on 12-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Ansgar [email protected]

FG DatenbankenMarch 2014Braunschweig

LOD in Digital Libraries -Current Issues

Index Newly Acquired Media

• Ancient world: Library of Alexandria• Today: database-oriented systems• Tomorrow: Web � Semantic Web in Libraries

- 2 -

SWIB = Melting pointfor librariansthat workwith LOD

Start: 2009Today:InternationalMeetup

- 3 -

„The Early Years …“ (they were grey)• Individually implemented solutions;proofs of concepts• First LOD cloud:

emerged in May 2007

• First Linked Library connection between Library of Congress, US and Swedish National Library

• Quick adoption of new technology

- 4 -

Linked (Library) Data: A Success Story

- 5 -

Current (Technological) Issues *)

1. Entity resolution2. Schema matching3. Distributed data management4. Automatic indexing5. Indexing non-textual content6. Data provenance

Out of scope here (but equally important)• Quality management (e.g., automated indexing)• Legal aspects• Job market

*) Disclaimer: No guarantee for completeness - 6 -

1. Entity Resolution• URI aliases to connect resources• Describing the same things in the real world

• Service for sameAs-links: .org

• Resolution of name, co-authors, title, and venue often not sufficient

- 7 -Source: J. Neubert, K. Tochtermann: Linked Library Data: Offering a Backbone for the Semantic Web, CiCIS, 2012.

Source Persons Organizations

DBpedia 364,000 148,000

Library of Congress Authorities 3,800,000 900,000

German NationalLibrary AuthorityFile 1,797,911 1,262,404

Virtual International Authority File 10 million 3.25 million

Example: DNB GND on Helmut Kohlhttp://d-nb.info/gnd/118564595

- 8 -

VIAF(Virtual International Authority File)• Combines multiple name authority files • Lower costs and increase utility of library authority files • Matching and linking widely-used authority files and

making that information available on the Web

- 9 -

2. Schema Matching• “When defining one’s vocabulary, refer to definition of

concepts and properties of existing vocabularies”• Goal: data becomes self-descriptive

• Integration of vocabularies is hard• Similar to the problem of identity

• Example: foaf:name vs. vcard:family-name

• Can be complex, even for very similar vocabularies

- 10 -

Example: STW and TheSoz

- 11 -

Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft

• Manually created mappings (mostly 2004/2005)• OAEI Library Track for ontology matching (since 2012)• Also connected to GND and ACROVOC

TheSoz (GESIS)

Example: STW and TheSoz

- 12 -

Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft

• Manually created mappings (mostly 2004/2005)• OAEI Library Track for ontology matching (since 2012)• Also connected to GND and ACROVOC

TheSoz (GESIS)

eGov‘ Example: Crimes in US vs. UK

Same or different?

Same or different?

- 13 -

3. Distributed Data ManagementSep. 2012

VIAF Example Source: Trevor Thornton – Linked Data for LibrariansSenior Applications Developer, NYPL LabsThe New York Public Library

http://archives.nypl.org/

mss/2071

http://viaf.org/viaf/5286

6196

‘142 linear feet’

http://archives.nypl.org/

mss/2071

http://purl.org/dc/term

s/creatorhttp://purl.org/dc/ter

ms/extent

http://purl.org/archival/vocab

/arch#heldBy

http://viaf.org/viaf/44312

399

http://purl.org/dc/ter

ms/creator

http://purl.org/dc/term

s/subject

Robert Moses Papers

The Power Broker

http://www.worldcat.org/

oclc/834874

- 15 -

Robert Moses(American city planner)

Robert Moses@ VIAF

Robert Caro writesabout Moses

Other work byCaro …

3. Distributed Data Management• Federated querying• Index structures (what information is where?)• SPARQL-based vs. traversal-based querying

• Ranking of results• User‘s expect same behavior as in web search• First hits implicitly more important and relevant• DFG project LibRank at ZBW

- 16 -

4. Automated Indexing

• Automated classification of PDFs into 100 classes (“Sachgruppen”) in PETRUS project at DNB

Source: E. Mödden Zukunftsfähige Inhaltserschließung – Strategienund Perspektiven in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek, GBV, 2013. - 17 -

Delivered publications per year (print/online)at DNB

4. Automated Indexing• DFG project GERHARD in 90s on automatically

indexing scientific Web content (involved 1997-1999)• ~ 1 Mio documents crawled and automatically indexed• Classified using the 10.000 concepts from the

Universal Decimal Classification (UDC)• Trilingual (German, English, French)

• Single server machine ~ 750 MB RAM• Oracle RDBMS with full text indices ConText

(today: Oracle Text)

- 18 -

GERHARD

- 19 -

• Auto-completion suggests terms from PND, STW, …• Author confirms by selecting terms• Keyword is matched with the semantic concept

- 20 -

Erschließung in

• Mapping scientific content with social media • For example, PDFs + blogs, tweets, research data, …

Content analysisStructured

scientific content

(fulltexts,

paragraphs,

citations,…)

Informal + hasty

content from

social media

channels

Linking to

EEXCESS

topics/

objects/

users - 21 -

5. Indexing non-textual content

6. Data Provenance• VIAF: inter-organizational and cross-border and thus

cross-lingual record linkage

• How to track metadata (re)use?• How to refer to original metadata when

library A uses a (part of) record from library B?

- 22 -

Europeana Data Model

“Provenance”of Mona Lisa

Source: Slide adopted from Kai Eckert

Provenance of the meta data

DM2E Data Bridge for Legacy Systems

Resource Description and Access• New cataloging code to replace AACR2 from 1978• Describe content, online• But not to confuse with RDF

• Inspired by Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)

• Applicable to any kind of resources („not only books“)• Provides guidelines

FRBR in a Nutshell

26

Work

Expression

Manifestation

Item

is realized through

is embodied in

is exemplified by

recursive

one

many

Group 1

Much more than just a „boring“ bibliographicdata record

ZBW – Services and Data• Leibnitz Information Center for Economics (Kiel and Hamburg)• 200+ employees, 3 professors (Scherp, Tochtermann, Peters)• Annual budget of 20,8 mio €

- 27 -

• 1 mio Open Access documents• 4,9 mio documents• Couple of thousand unique

visitors per month

• 70.000 open access documents

• Intelligent use of STW

Got Interested?

Contact me:

Ansgar Scherp

Email: [email protected]

Web: http://zwb.eu/en/research/knowledge-discovery

FRBR or What is Beauty?

Work

Expression

Manifestations

Items

Source: Lynne Chase: Resource Description and Access, Emporia State U., Fall 2009