1

Local Wisdom as Basis of Social Capital in Strengthening Community

Resilience at Reroroja Village, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

A. INTRODUCTION

East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) is one of Indonesia’s most disaster prone provinces. In

early 2013 alone – in 3-17 January 2013 – various disasters have hit 16 from the 21 districts

in NTT Province. According to NTT District Secretary, Frans Salem1, disasters have occurred

in Kupang City, the districts of Belu, SouthWest Sumba, Alor, Kupang, East Flores, Sikka,

Ende, Lembata, Timor Tengah Selatan, Manggarai, East Manggarai, Nagekeo, West Sumba,

Sabu Raijua and Rote Ndao. The 16 disaster areas were based on a report from the NTT

District Disaster Mitigation Agency.

Within the above time span, natural disasters have devastated 16 districts and

cities above, ranging from earthquakes, floods and landslides. The epicentrum of

earthquakes were located in Manggarai, NTT at 8.41 South Longitude and 120.69 West

Latitude at a depth of 148 km. The worst floods occurred in Belu and Kupang Districts. In

Belu, floods inundated nine villages and at least 1725 homes. Floods in Belu were caused by

overflow from the Benanain River due to heavy rains within the last two weeks. In Kupang

District, floods inundated 350 homes, including the Trans Timor highway connecting NTT

with Timor Leste, causing disruption to transportation between the countries.

Landslides occurred in Kupang City and buried at least 20 houses in the Subdistrict

of Belo. Landslides also occurred in Ende District, severing communication along the Trans

Flores highway. The floods and landslides in particular have caused severe damages to the

community. In addition to inundating and burying people’s homes, floods and landslide also

destroyed people’s crops. As a result, the people have not only lost their homes but also

their livelihood as a means to meet their daily needs. In response, said Chief of the NTT

1http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2013/01/17/058455034/Bencana-Alam-Melanda-16-Daerah-di-NTT.

Uploaded on 17 January 2013, and downloaded on 15 April 2013, at 14.30 hours. Similar news and information

can also be found at http://nttprov.go.id/2012/index.php/en/89-berita-aktual/310-sebagian-wilayah-ntt-

dilanda-bencana, uploaded on 15 January 2013, and downloaded on 15 April 2013, at 14.33 hours.

2

District Disaster Mitigation Agency, Tini Thadeus2, the provincial government has distributed

emergency assistance for flood victims, which include cooked food, rice and canvas tents.

Heavy rains coupled with strong winds and earthquakes recently occurred on

Thursday, 2 April 2013. According to the Ende District Chief, Paulinus Domi, around 17

houses occupied by 19 families were carried away by floods; transportation facilities,

including 15 bridges were destroyed. This natural disaster has also killed 15 people in Ende

who have not been found to date. Therefore, in addition to managing those who have lost

their homes, the local government has also priorized their agenda to find victim who are yet

unaccounted for. Similar disasters have also struck other districts in Flores, such as in the

larger islands of Larantuka, East Flores. The total number of victim amount to 41 dead, 19

lost and almost 280 injured. The disaster has also destroyed around 25 hectares of

productive rice fields which cannot be harvested this year3.

Sikka is one of the severe district in Flores island at NTT which struck with hazard.

One of them is the earthquake that causing tsunami at 1992. The victims are more than

2000 peoples at Maumere, Sikka District. It includes Reroroja Villages where the tsunami

and flood hit Ndete Hamlet causing severe damage at the houses and infrastructures.

From the above narrative, it is evident that three types of natural disasters are

dominant in NTT, they are earthquakes, floods and landslides. Earthquakes are unavoidable

occurrences, as they are truly naturally caused4. However, floods and landslides are mostly

caused by human interference through the destruction of the environment. In this area, we

(proposed research team) wish to find and study local wisdoms in maintaining the

environment in order to anticipate, and manage disasters based on local customs in NTT. In

order to mitigate the effects of natural disasters, the Central Government and District

Governments have prepared various laws and regulations to guide them in implementing

their duties. However the implementation of this regulations or policy related with disaster

2http://www.nttterkini.com/bencana-alam-terjang-delapan-kabupaten-di-ntt/. Uploaded 28 Februari 2013,

downloaded 15 April 2013, jam 14.15 WIB. 3http://www.indosiar.com/fokus/penanganan-akhir-bencana-alam-di-flores_24207.html. Downloaded on 15

April 2013, at 14.20 WIB. 4However, earthquakes which occur undersea have potential for creating tsunami floods. This type of disaster

once occurred in Flores, NTT on 12 December 1992 and remains a threat for most of the people living along

the coast. This information was downloaded on 15 April 2013, at 22.30 WIB from: http://andy-

pio.blogspot.com/2011/02/baba-akong-dan-prahara-tsunami-bertabur.html which was uploaded on Friday, 25

February 2011.

3

was not optimal at district until village level. Disaster Management Plan was not available

yet at district level.

Community subsistence has to consider local knowledge and community

collaboration. Evidence of Robinson (2011) study showed the unsuccess settlement

rebuilding of Wuring and Babi islands (Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia)

earthquake and tsunami victims. The project did not consider fishing community local

wisdom in reducing vulnerability to future disaster. In the contrary, Pakistan and Columbia

settlement plan after the earthquake that striked these countries, pondered specific

community needs, incorporated vernacular from the culture elements. As a result, the

project ware accepted within the respective communities. No post-disaster communities

are the same. Since rebuilding their lives requires local involvement, understanding local

wisdom is a necessary requirement.

Resilience capacity of traditional society and the concurrant of cultural change rely on

four factors, namely: the nature of the hazad, the pre-disaster socio-cultural context, the

capacity of the community resilience, the geographical setting, and the rehabilitation policy.

These factors significant vary in time and space, from one disaster to the other. In his

findings, Gaillard (2007) concluded that local variations of the four factors are more

important than the theoretical framework itself. Local society capability overcomes the

damage brought by the natural disaster. It also able to predict eventual cultural change

within the society.

B. PROBLEM STATEMENT

Local wisdom/customs as part of culture is a means for learning from natural

disasters, which is then used by the local community as basis for managing the effects of

disasters. Local customs arise according to each specific location, especially its geographic

elements, i.e. topography, climate, or typical conditions of its environment. Without the

development of local wisdoms, communities could not revive from disasters which

frequently occur any time. Local wisdoms are used as a means to adapt with their disaster

prone environment, and help the local community to survive because of their extraordinary

resilient nature.

4

Local customs developed in certain communities are uniquely different than in other

communities. These customs become a community’s spefically unique capital. NTT consists

of 77 ethnic groups spread over 130 large and small islands (Statistical Office at NTT

Province). There are 3213 villages in NTT of which more than 50 % are vulnerable to natural

disasters.

The north coast of Flores Island is one of several areals vulnerable to earthquakes

and tsunami. The population is more concentrated on its north coast compared to its

internal areas. Historically, the most severe disaster that been exist in NTT is earthquake

and tsunami in 1992 at Sikka District. Not only victims as loss inhabitants but also loss of

private and public infrastructure are becoming obstacles for sustainable development at the

district.

Many ethnic groups live along the north coast side by side. The dominant ethnic

groups living along the north coast consist of the Tidung-Bajo, Bugis, Javanese dan Chinese.

However, some villages still support indigineous ethnic communities of Flores, as found in

Ndete Village. This study only focuses on the Ndete Village as one of the villages where the

majority of its inhabitants are indigenous of that area. It is unique because it still has strong

local roots, and because the people here were able to immediately revive from the tsunami

disaster.

C. RESEARCH QUESTION

Based on its background and identification of problems, questions raised in this

study include:

1. What kind of local wisdom that influence community social capital?

2. How social capital be able to strengthening the community economic resilience ?

3. How social capital implemented in economic resilience programme?

4. How is the linkage between social capital and disaster management regulation?

D. STUDY OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to identify the community social capital in stimulating the

economic resilience programme for people at Reroroja Village, Magepanda Subdistrict,

Sikka District, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia i.e., “world views” that enable them to survive,

5

adapt and improve life according to their disaster prone environment. in East Nusa

Tenggara, Indonesia.

E. FOCUS OF STUDY

The study focuses on local customs/wisdoms as basis for managing the effects of

natural disasters based on two factors, namely:

- Focus on Location:

Ndete Hamlet, Reroroja Vilage, Subdistrict of Magepanda, Sikka District, East

NT (NTT), Indonesia.

- Focus of Analysis:

The attitude and values of local customs related to people’s culture and local

environmental conditions. At the analysis stage, values developed within the

community in connection with the networks created between the local

community and the Local Government, Central Government and various

institutions in the management of the effects of disaster in their vicinity.

F. SCOPE OF STUDY

The study covers:

- Rituals believed to maintain the balance of nature within the cultural

environment.

- Community attitude and patterns of behavior towards rituals and local customs

in maintaining the balance of nature (avoiding danger/bad luck).

- Relations between values of local customs with geographic conditions.

- Form of relations or networking between the local community and local

government in dealing with disaster issues within their environment and in the

cultural context.

- Values of local customs that may be utilized to strengthen cooperation between

the local community and the local government.

6

G. LITERATURE ANALYSIS

Culture

Reference to Suparlan (1986:3-5, 1995:15, 2004a:63, 2004b:4-7, 2004c:225,

2008:529), culture can operationally be defined as knowledge, belief and values possessed

by people in communities that are used as guides to view their world, it serves as a tool to

interpret situations being faced, and to encourage and produce meaningful actions in

dealing these situations and gain benefit from it. Culture consists of categorized systems, to

categorize themselves and situations being faced, whether within community life itself

which is adjusted to the group and community as well as with the local community, the

category system result in concepts which exist as cultures.

According to Suparlan (1986:3-5, 1995:15, 2004a:5-6,63, 2004b:4-7, 2004c:225), in

short, culture is defined as guidance for life in a community deemed correct by the

community concerned, and used to interpret and understand situations they face, to

produce actions relevant to each situation in accordance with the following needs:

(1) Biological or primary needs (eat, drink, sleep, sex, etc.)

(2) Social or secondary needs (communication, education, social control, etc.)

(3) Norms or humanity, i.e. needs that integrate the various needs contained

within the biological and social needs. Needs for etiquette or norms arise

from human nature as God’s creations who have the capacity to think, feel

and moralize. Thus the fulfillment of these needs is human in nature, rather

than bestial. The need for norms include:

- The need to differentiate right from wrong, fair and unfair, innocent and

guilty, etc.

- Need to express feelings and sentiments as individuals or collectively or

togetherness.

- Need to prove their identity, origins, and the need to have faith and self

respect.

- Need to express aesthetic feelings, ethics and morality.

- Need for recreation and entertainment

- Need for feelings of security, peace and structured life.

7

According to Septiady (2007), the existence of culture in human life is as function

within structure of activities in meeting human needs for living, as guide for human

interaction and in identifying various phenomena into categories or groups within its

environment – categories that can be used to meet man’s many needs.

As a unit of life, a community has its own culture distinct from other communities,

expressed within a region where it occupies and preserves its community. Expressions from

members of the community are made by utilizing resources available within their

environment in order to meet their needs to survive.

A community is a structure consisting of interrelated roles of its members, where

these roles are carried out according to accepted norms. Interaction between roles

produces role structures that are seen as social rules. The presence of these social rules

within a community can be seen during human interactions between members of the

community and with members outside the community.

Norms within community social rules are norms that govern relationships between

roles. It contains ethical and moral values that must be adhered to and followed by actors in

their relationship between members of the community, and in activities to meet their daily

needs. Norms prevailing in a community refer to cultures possessed by the community.

Ritual

Rituals are defined as actions or a series of human actions that are more or

different than the consistent and structured actions, and result in unrecorded expressions in

the form of symbols by the actors. Rituals are not as easy and simple as what is used in

general models and means of human communication, however some of it enables people to

communicate among themselves. Rituals are generally related to religious matters, however

this is not the only reason for implementing them (Septiady, 2002a:2). According to

Rappaport (Bauman,ed., 1992:249-250), rituals have the following characteristics:

(1) Is a form or structure of a number of characteristics in a few or many human

interactions, hence, rituals can be seen as a set of ethics or tradition.

(2) Requires exhibition and resources, with the help of a medium (witchdoctor or

traditional leader) as part of conveying their message to the community.

(3) Are a series of religious actions, where the venue is made special because it

adheres to accepted traditions.

8

Adherence of culture owners to the requirements of the rituals do not mainly stem

from their fear of its sanctions, but more from their awareness to comply with the laws of

tradition and laws of nature. They are afraid to wreak the wrath of nature, and therefore

construe natural disasters as the wrath of nature on their wrong doings (Septiady,

2002c:303). The wrath of nature above is believed to be caused by the destruction of the

cosmos which protect them, hence, man must understand their “position” in the life of their

cosmos (Septiady, 2002a:3-4). To ensure that man shall always remember their “position” –

and avoid the wrath of their cosmos, symbols (in rituals) are needed and believed to

determine their good or bad fates (Jones, 1965:97). Because symbols play an important role

in human faiths, symbols may also be the holy road towards synchronizing with the cosmos

through the messages it conveys (Eliade, 1959;128-130, 136-138).

Symbol

In understanding a belief, its conveyance is often incorporated into symbolic

meanings that encapture the cosmic view as derived from people’s understanding

(Rapoport, 1969 dalam Septiady, 2002c:302).

“The man always expresses himself in symbols, and that language,

science, art and myth have their own systems of symbols. The symbols

materialize, substantiate as it were, his experiences and give them a more

enduring form. Symbols make these experiences transferable; every

individual can communicate them to others, thus reproducing his

experiences in a sharply defined form” (Van Baal, 1971:157-60,219; Geertz,

1992:16)

In his book, Kevin Lynch (1960: 1-13) stated that the image of the city is created

through the opinions of people living in the city. This image creation is based on the

collective memory of the people and symbols that possess social roles. In cities, symbols can

be categorized into four types, the first are persons that represent the city; the second are

discursive of urban narratives expressed as songs, poetry, maps, and various urban policies;

the third is connected with behavior such as religious ceremonies or traditions, and parades;

the fourth are domain materials i.e. statues, city architecture, etc. (Nas, Jaffe, Samuels: 2006

in Leeuwen: 2011).

9

In his study of Aceh, Leeuwan (2011: 172) found that after the tsunami disaster,

people in Aceh felt they did not need to build new symbols in the form of monuments to

commemorate the event. They used the Banda Aceh Great Mosque as their symbol. Forms

created by nature itself were used as cultural symbols. These indicate that the cultural

symbol of the Aceh people is strongly connected with history and nature.

Social Capital

According to Robert Putnam (2000), social capital is the collective value of all forms

in social networking by doing for benefit to others. The network is formed between

individuals who previously had social relationships, then it create a rule and norm in the

network. Rules and norms are then formed in general, and establish a trust between

individuals. Ultimately, the main goal will be reached is that the social and economic

benefits. Below is the staging of social capital form:

The Process of Social Networking

In seeing the social networks formed, Putnam divides it into two categories: 1)

bonding and 2) bridging. Bonding is a group with the same background, and it is exclusive

and closed. The strategies to keep these bonding groups to survive are by keeping them in

Social relationship

Social Norm

Social Network

General Norm

Social and Economic Benefits

10

touch with the outside group, which Putnam called as bridging. In the contrary, bridging is

inclusive and open as heterogeneous background. Both of these categories are working as a

process to achieve social and economic benefits. Further explanation can be seen through

the picture below:

Relation of Bonding and Bridging

By completing the theory of Putnam, Simon Szreter (2002) added a new dimension

to social capital called “linking”. According to Szreter, government took place in managing

the relationship between bonding and bridging process. Linking process can then be

implemented as regulations that exist in the country. In addition, the Szreter also realized

that Putnam's social capital theory is too static. Social capital can also increase and

decrease, depending on the ideological and economic environment. By understanding that

social capital is a dynamic resource, the internal and external members of the group formed

could changes and makes the formed imbalance.

Bridging

11

Relation of Bonding-Bridging-Linking

Adaptation

Humans always adapt themselves to overcome all that is wanting. These

adaptations are real or symbolic. Yet in fact, these two types of adapting are

interdependent. Physical or real adapting may be strongly connected with faith that is very

transcendent, which also needs further adaptation in religious symbols. These religious-

symbolic adaptations are closely connected with community behavior patterns in its

attempt to ‘survive’ with the help of knowledge, and traditional rules related with ‘norms’

(Septiady, 2002b:258).

According to Smit et al (2001) in Shaw et al (2010), climatic change adaptation is

define as adjustment ecological, social, and economic system in responses to actual or

expected climatic stimuli and their effects. Adaptation in facing natural condition that are

vulnerable is also an adjustment in ecological, social, culture and economic system

(Widyawati & Shalih, 2012). Human adapt themselves as a real action to survive by synergy

with the nature.

Adaptation is also closely related to people’s knowledge of their living

environment. The more one understands its living environment, the more able they are to

adapt (Widyawati & Shalih: 2012). The ability of communities to adapt is related to how

Country

Bridging

12

long they have lived in that area and is shown by their understanding of local symbols as an

inherent part of them.

Guleria & Edward (2012) was doing their research on coastal community resilience of

Tamil Nadu State, India. To find out vulnerability and resilience factors of the communities,

they studied eight elements of resilience i.e., Governance, Coastal Resource Management,

Land Use and Structural Design, Society and Economy, Risk Knowledge, Warning and

Evacuation, Emergency Response and Disaster Recovery. Specific vulnerabilities and

resilience factors of the coastal communities must be addressed especially with respect to

economic benefits. To build community resilience, mitigation strategies have to linkages

between community development, coastal and disaster management processes. These

linkages need to be explicit and driven by community members themselves, working in

concert with national and local government programs and NGOs. With this result,

community value should be intensely understood.

Norris et al (2008) stated that community resilience is not about scientific value per se but

also relations between stressors, various adaptive capacities, and wellness over time. Norris

et al studied was done in several continents, which are Asia, Africa, Australia, and South,

Central, and North America. With this vast spanned of areas studied they cannot envision a

human culture or society in which the basic concepts of adaptive capacities and human

resilience in facing disaster. Human culture as social capital to manage community survival

potential should study through a distinctive area and with deep observation.

H. POLICIES RELATED TO COMMUNITY, CULTURE AND DISASTER

In an effort to empower communities in managing disasters during and after it

occurs, various policies and regulations have been formulated by the Government. One of

these is Government of Indonesia Law No.24/2007 on Disaster Management. In Article 4 of

the Law stipulates that the purpose of disaster management among others is to, in item a)

of Article 4 clearly states that the people must be protected from disasters. One way that

may be developed to protect the community is by understanding the local customs/wisdom.

An understanding of local customs would mean utilizing values inherent within the local

customs which are made for the good of the said community, including protecting them

from disaster.

13

The people’s right to mitigate disasters is stipulated in Article 26. This article

stipulates that all persons as members of the community have the right to participate in the

planning, operations, and maintenance of health service delivery assistance program, which

includes psychosocial support. In addition, all persons have the right to participate in the

decision making of disaster management activities, especially those related to themselves

and their communities; as well as to monitor its implementation according to prearranged

mechanisms. These rights may be implemented well if communities were given the chance

to convey their local wisdom in dealing with disasters. The values of local customs will

strengthen any attempts to mitigate disasters designed by the Government, both central

and district governments.

Article 27 in the same Law stipulates that communities are responsible for

implementing disaster management activities. In order to implement this responsibility,

which of course is implemented in cooperation with other elements, the community can

utilize their strengths. One of the strengths possessed by the local communities is the value

of local wisdoms.

Article 36 explains the planning activity in disaster management. The article states

that disaster management plans include determining preparedness mechanisms and

management of the after effects of disaster. This step may be implemented well if local

wisdom values were included as an element in planning activities.

Other regulations that also support community empowerment are Government

Regulation No.21/2008 on Implementation of Disaster Management. Within this Law,

Article 9 stipulates that in implementing disaster management, efforts must be made to

strengthen community resilience. Strengthening community resilience may be done through

the development of traditional values developed and implemented by communities in their

daily lives.

Disaster Early Warning Systems implemented with a view (Article 9) to reduce risks

of disaster effects is done by observing disaster symptoms; analyzing observation results

data; make decisions based on results of analysis; disseminating the resulting decisions; and

implementation of actions by the community. Observation of disaster systems and

implementation of actions is made through sophisticated knowledge and technologies,

strengthened by using local wisdoms available. Hence, community participation is not

14

merely limited as implementer but also provides input and conducts analysis based on

knowledge culled through generations and generally well known by local communities.

Article 57 of the same Law states that rehabilitation activities should consider

community aspirations, social, culture and economic conditions. It is obvious that local

wisdom is an elemental factor in managing disasters and empowering communities.

Rehabilitation based on local customs is expected to improve the resilience of the

concerned communities.

In environmental improvement activities of disaster areas (Article 61), physical

activities in environmental rehabilitation should meet technical, social, economical and

cultural as well as ecosystem requirements of the region. Improvement of the environment

that meets these requirements must take into account the various activities of related

institutions/agencies and the aspiration of communities in disaster prone areas. Statements

mentioned in Article 61 Para 3 is further supported by Article 62 which stipulates that

technical plans must be formulated optimally through surveys, investigation and designs

taking into account the social, cultural, economic and traditional conditions as well as

standards of construction. The cultural element is one of the requirements of environmental

rehabilitation. As point for consideration, culture is expected to improve community

resilience to help them regain normalcy after disasters.

Law 3 Article 85, goes on to explain the necessity for steps to revive social

community life. This endeavour attempts to rearrange life and develop life patterns

towards a better social community life. The Article explicitly explains that social community

life is fundamental for community strength in dealing with disaster and regaining normalcy

after the disaster.

NTT Province itself already has a policy in terms of a response to a disaster Tsunami

event in 1992. In 2008 they issued Regulation No. 16 which set the NTT on the

Implementation of Disaster Management and in 2009 they issued Regulation No. 16 NTT

governing the establishment of the Regional Disaster Management Agency(Badan

Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah). Then the Regional Disaster Management Agency issued

the Decree of the Head of the Regional Disaster Management Agency NTT No. 2009 on

combating Enforcement Agency Strategic Plan for Regional Disaster Year 2009-2013.

15

I. AREA STUDY DESCRIPTION

Ndete hamlet is locating at Reroroja Village, Magepanda Sub District, Sikka District,

East Nusa Tenggara Province. Based on Central Bureau of Statistics at Sikka District, Reroroja

village has a total area of 41.97 km2 consisting of three hamlets (including Ndete), 7 RW

and 24 RT (RW and RT are terminology of administration region below hamlets level in

Indonesia). The astronomical locations of Ndete hamlet exist on 8° 31’ 47.80” South Latitude

and 122° 02’ 13.29” east longitude.

Geographically, at the north of Rerorejo Village borders to Ndete Gulf where rows

of coral reefs and mangroves exist along the coastal area. East side borders to Magepande

village and west side Ende District. Meanwhile, at the south this village borders to Mego Sub

District.

Map of Study Area Ndete Hemlet

Physiographic, Ndete hamlet located on valley at the coastal area that surrounded

by hills. Meanwhile, Ndete gulf is shallow water with coral reef as habitat for fish

congregate. The entire Magepanda District including Ndete hamlet has a tropical climate.

16

Based on Sandy (1985), the climate of Ndete Hamlet is dry climate with characteristic

maximum rainfall in January, or sometimes in February, while the minimum rainfall is

usually in August. The amount of average annual rainfall is usually not too many. Coastal

areas are usually dry, while the hills are still influenced by orographic rain.

Reroroja village has a population 3,333 inhabitants in 2011 with 821 heads of

households. In comparison with the last year, there is reduction in the number of residents.

There are 666 inhabitants who moved from the village in 2011 and only 467 inhabitants

moved in to the village.

Population density in Reroreja village is 79.41 inhabitants/km2. There are 87.75%

Reroroja villagers is Catholic, 12.15% are Muslim and the rest are Protestant. Within 2008,

there were 304 household becoming targets of rural poverty alleviation in this Reroroja

Village.

Picture of Ndete Gulf

Source: Google earth

In terms of public service facility at Reroreja Village, there are 4 primary schools

with 33 teachers and 597 pupils. However, this vallage do not have junior high school and or

high school. Health facility that exist in the Reroroja Village is 1 primary health center called

Puskesmas, 1 supporting health centre (called Poskesdes) and 1 integrated service health

(called Posyandu). The service and infrastructure of health centre is still in modest level.

17

Most of residents in Reroreja Village are fisherman and farmers. The fishermen in

this village is fishing at shallow sea, while farmers in theis village are a crop farmer.

Agricultural crops that cultivated are paddy, maize, cassava, sweet potato, peanut, green

beans, cacao, cashew, coffee, pepper and coconut.

Simple and modest life is still identifying by the residents activities. People still use

kerosene or firewood as fuel for cooking. They get kerosene at a price of 4,500 rupiah per

liter, while the rice as their basic food has the price 8,500 dollars per kgs.

J. RESEARCH METHODS

Research methods used will be the qualitative method which is similar to the

naturalistic inquiry characteristics. The focus of the study will involve people, groups,

communities, programs, and patterns of relationship or interactions wherein all shall be

viewed in its natural context (as is). The study is designed according to ethnography in the

spatial context. Ethnography is understood as the central role of culture in understanding

the way of life of the groups being studied. The spatial outlook will explain the geographic

characteristics which develop local values adopted in the community.

Culture is defined as the overall social behavior pattern of the community being

studied as owners of that culture, who in turn provides (Boyle, 1994; Punch, 1998;

Poerwandari, 2011):

(1) Standards/systems for perceiving, believing, evaluating and implementing/

taking action;

(2) Regulations and symbols in relationship patterns and interpretations.

Believing that each word, action or product of culture represents certain

meanings.

Cultural data collected in the field is treated in a practical and effective manner.

Steps for data collection are as follows:

(1) Collection of Secondary Data. This step is done by collecting various information

from government institutions, non government agencies, reports from various

18

studies and publications. Collected data includes maps depicting the situation of

village being studied in relation to its environment.

(2) Collection of primary data at field. Scope of study will focus on values of local

customs obtained through various means (Hoggart, Lees, & Davies, 2002: 201-301),

i.e. focused group discussions, in depth interview and oral histories. The three

methods have proven excellent results if participative observation activities can gain

the community’s trust. Therefore, some time is needed to gain community trust.

Data processing is made by coding which is carried out by (ref. Poerwandari,

2011:172; Heywood, et al, 1999:593-604):

a) Formulating verbatim transcript (word by word) of field reports in such a

manner to allow large empty columns at the left or rights side of transcripts.

The blank columns may be used to impute certain codes or notes on the

transcript.

b) Methodically and continuously number lines in the transcript and/or notes of

field reports.

c) Name each file with certain codes. Selected codes should be easy to

remember and appropriate to represent the said file, as well as provide dates

and its location.

d) Location of each code not only describes its geographical position but also the

characteristic and conditions of the area. Codes should include global position

using the GPS (Global Positioning System) and mapped using the program

Quantum GIS © as part of the Geography Information System instruments.

According to Strauss & Corbin (1990), the coding stage can be divided into three

parts, namely ‘open coding’, ‘axial coding’, and ‘selective coding’. Open Coding allows

researchers to identify categories, properties and its dimensions. The Axial Coding is used to

organize data using new methods by the development of relationships between categories;

or between categories with several subcategories under it. Selective Coding is made based

on the ability of researchers to select the most basic categories systematically, and link it to

other categories and validate these links.

After data coding, thematic analysis is made as basis of qualitative research

analysis. The purpose of thematic analysis is to allow researchers to find the cultural

patterns existing within the communities being studied. Thematic analysis is a process for

19

coding information which results in a theme list, theme model or complex indicators,

qualification related to the theme, or factors between or combination of the above. The

theme describes and interprets phenomenons existing within the local customs. In short,

the thematic analysis undertaken have purposes – and each purpose may overlap as follows

(reference Boyatzis, 1998):

(1) As a way of seeing.

(2) As a way of providing meaning on matters which normally are not apparently

seen as interconnected.

(3) As a way for analyzing qualitative information

(4) As a systematic way to observe people, interactions, groups, situations, or

certain cultures.

(5) As a means to ‘change’ or ‘transfer’ qualitative information into quantitative

information.

(6) These steps are then presented in the form of symbols and geographic space.

The next stage involves the researcher to move from concrete data to the

development of concepts. The flow of steps followed systematically through processes are

based on the following diagram:

Diagram 1. Research Purpose Concept Development Process

Source: Made based on Smith (1995) and Poerwandari (2011:179).

The study result will be scale up into local government policy and action

programme as well.

DATA KEY WORDS THEME CATEGORY

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CATEGORIES (PATTERN)

DEVELOPMENT OF THEORY

20

K. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Disaster is a nature incident that happened without clear warnings. People that lives in

vulnerable areas of disaster have early warning system that based on nature. They develop the

knowledge base on experience and custom that inheritage from generation to generation. In this

era, local wisdom which is the substance of culture that lives in the community is not well

understandable.

Culture is a unique footprint of a community. It prevents the community especially from

external exposes. In facing disaster impact, culture is also community’s capacity. In preventing the

community, culture could be dissected in two types, namely tight culture and loose culture. Tight

culture composed of ritual, symbols and local wisdom that cultivate local knowledge. On the other

hand, loose culture is function as potential source in involving outsider stakeholders. Loose culture

provides opportunity to have a raltionships with outsider in creating social, economic and political

intevention. In this research intervention is intended to flourish economic opportunity.

Local knowledge and economic opportunity are function as social capital in strengthening

the economic community resilience. By understanding the local wisdom key points, this study can

be enrich either the programme and the regional regulation as well.

21

L. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boyatzis, R.

1998 Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code

Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Boyle, J.

1994 “Styles of Etnography,” Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods

(Janice M. Morse, ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Eliade, Mircea

1959 The Sacred and the Profane. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Word.

Geertz, Clifford

1992 Kebudayaan dan Agama. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Gaillard, J-C

2007 Resilience of Traditional Societies in Facing Natural Hazards. Disaster

Prevention and Management, vol. 16 no. 4, 2007: 522-544. Emerald Group

Publishing Limited.

Guleria, S, & J. K. P. Edward

2012 Coastal community resilience: analysis of resilient elements in 3 districts of

Tamil Nadu State, India. J Coast Conserv (2012) 16:101–110. DOI

10.1007/s11852-011-0178-8.

Heywood, Ian et al

1999 “Global positioning systems as a practicalfieldwork tool: applications in

mountainenvironments”, Applied Geography: Principles and Practices, An

Introduction to Useful Research in Physical, Environmental and Human

Geography(MichaelPacione, ed). London: Routledge.

22

Hoggart, K; L. Lees; A. Davies

2002 Researching Human Geography. London. Arnold.

Jones, Ernest

1965 Psychoanalysis and Folklore. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,

INC.

Leeuwen, Rob van.

2011 “A Touch of Tragedy: Pre and Post-Tsunami Symbolism in Banda Aceh,

Indonesia”. Cities Full of Symbols. P.J. Nas (ed). Leiden University Press.

Lynch, Kevin

1960 The Image of The City. Cambridge: The MIT University Press, and Harvard

University Press

Norris, F.H, S.P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K.F. Wyche, R.L. Pfefferbaum

2008 Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and

Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal Community Psychology

41: 127-150. DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6

Poerwandari, E. Kristi

2011 Pendekatan Kualitatif Untuk Perilaku Manusia. Depok: LPSP3, Fakultas

Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Punch, K. F.

1998 Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.

London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Putnam, Robert.

2000 The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York : Simon &

Schuster

23

Rappaport, Roy A.

1992 “Ritual,” Folklore, Cultural Performances, and Popular entertainments

(Bauman, Richard, ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Robinson, James B.

2011 Cultural Resilience Architecture in Post-Disaster Planning.

ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario,

Canada.

Sandy, I Made.

1985 Republik Indonesia, Geografi Regional : buku teks. Jakarta : Jurusan

Geografi FMIPA Universitas Indonesia.

Septiady, Yophie

2002a “Ritual-Ritual pada Rumah Adat: Dalam Kajian Proses,” Jurnal Teknik,

Volume 15 Nomor 1, Februari 2002. Jakarta: Pusat Pengabdian Kepada

Masyarakat Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila.

2002b “Local Knowledge Berdasarkan Sistem Pengetahuan pada Rumah Adat

Suku Dayak Membuluh Desa Bangkal Kalimantan Barat,” Jurnal Teknik,

Volume 15 Nomor 5, Oktober 2002. Jakarta: Pusat Pengabdian Kepada

Masyarakat Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila.

2002c “Local Knowledge Berdasarkan Sistem Religi pada Rumah Adat Suku Dayak

Membuluh Desa Bangkal Kalimantan Barat,” Jurnal Teknik, Volume 15

Nomor 6, Desember 2002. Jakarta: Pusat Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila.

2006 Kebudayaan dan Penampilan waria di Jakarta (Thesis). Depok, Jawa Barat:

Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Program

Pascasarjana Departemen Antropologi.

Smit, B. et al.

2001 Adaptation Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and

Equity in Shaw, R; Juan M. Pulhin; Joy P. Pereira. Climate Change

24

Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Overview of Issues and Challenges

in Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Issues and

Challenges (Shaw, R; Juan M. Pulhin; Joy P. Pereira, ed). Bingley. Emerald

Group Publishing Limited.

Smith, J. A. & Hare, L. & L. Van Langenhove

1995 Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage Publications.

Strauss & Corbin

1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and

Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Suparlan, Parsudi

1986 Kebudayaan dan Pembangunan. Media Ika No.11 Tahun xiv.

1995 Orang Sakai di Riau: Masyarakat Terasing dalam Masyarakat Indonesia.

Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.

2004a Hubungan Antar-Sukubangsa. Jakarta: YPKIK.

2004b Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme dalam Perspektif Masyarakat Majemuk

Indonesia. Jakarta: Jurnal Polisi Indonesia No.6, Tahun V/April 2004.

2004c Masyarakat dan Kebudayaan Perkotaan: Perspektif Antropologi

Perkotaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian.

2008 Dari Masyarakat Majemuk Menuju Masyarakat Multikultural. Diedit oleh:

Chryshnanda D. I. & Yulizar Syafri. Jakarta: YPKIK.

Szreter, Simon

2002 The State of Social Capital: Bringing Back in Power, Politics, and History.

Journal Theory and Society. Vol 31. No 5. pp 573-621

Van Baal, J.

25

1971 Symbols for Communication. Assen, Nedherlands: Koninklijke van Gorcum

& Comp. N. V.

Widyawati & O. Shalih

2012 Bentuk Adaptasi Korban Banjir Tahunan. Conference: Learning From

Japan. Japanese Studies Programme, Universitas Indonesia.

Widyawati

2012 Rebuild Urban Areas, Cooperation between Government and Others.

Conference: “Disaster and The On-Going-Recovery: A Task for disaster's

Politics or the Local Indigenous? (A Discussion of Indonesia,Japan and Asia

disaster recovery Experience)”. Japanese Studies Programme, Universitas

Indonesia.

CVApril 2013 Page 1

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAIL

Name

Sex

Place and Date Birth

Address

:

: Female

: Jakarta, 17 June 1960

: Jl.Palem Raja II no 24 TamanYasmin Sektor 5,

Bogor, Indonesia

Telephone (Home) : 62 251 8431 409

Occupation : Lecturer

Office Address : Departmentof Geography FMIPA-UI

Office Telephone/Fax

E-mail

KampusUniversitasIndonesia, Depok

: 62 – 21 – 7873067

:

ORGANIZATION EXPERIENCE

1996-1999 : Executive Secretary Departmentof Geography, Faculty

Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia

1999-2003 : Head of Departmentof Geography, Faculty Mathematics

and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia,

2001 – 2011 : Executive Secretary Urban Studies Programme,

Universitas Indonesia,

2001 – 2005 : Head of Training Division, Urban and Regional Center

Universitas Indonesia

2008 – now : Head of Academic Quality Assurance Unit, Faculty

Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia,

2009-2010 :Member of Academic Quality Assurance Board

Universitas Indonesia,

2010-2013 : Secretary of Academic Quality Assurance Board

Universitas Indonesia,

CVApril 2013 Page 2

COURSES

1. Human Geography, Undergraduate Programme, Department of Geography,

Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, 2012 – now.

2. Planning and Development System.Geography Graduate Programme, Faculty of

Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia. 2008 – 2011.

3. Development Planning Method. Urban Studies Programme, Graduate Programme,

Universitas Indonesia. 2009 – now.

4. Urban Geography. Geography Undergraduate Programme, Faculty of

Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia.1990 – now

5. Transportation Geography. Geography Undergraduate Programme, Faculty of

Mathematics and Sciences, Universitas Indonesia. 2004– now

6. Urban and Regional Planning. Urban Studies Programme, Graduate Programme,

Universitas Indonesia. 2002 – 2007

RESEARCH

1. Team Leader: Community Development Programme on “Geography

Information System as Dengue Fever Community Awareness Media in

Pademangan Barat Subdistrict, Jakarta”. Urban Studies Programme, Graduate

Programme, Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

2. Researher: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Finance. Sucofindo. 2011.

3. Researcher: History of Department Geography University of Indonesia

Curriculum. Department of Geography University of Indonesia, Jakarta. 2010.

4. Team Leader: Geography Information System as Socialization Facilities for

Dengue Region in Pademangan Barat Sub District, Jakarta. Urban Studies

Programme, Graduate Programme University of Indonesia. 2009

5. Researcher: Multidisiplin Research in “Representational Space Analysis and

Walkability Assessment in Sub Urban Area in Indonesia and Japan (Case Study:

Depok, Indonesia and Tama, Japan). Urban Sustainability Research Center for

Japanese Studies. 2009

6. Researcher: Master Plan on Air Quality. Meteorology and Geophysics Board.

2007

CVApril 2013 Page 3

7. Researcher: Analysis and Identification of Infrastructur Needs in Remote Area,

Case study in Maluku, Maluku Utara, Irian Jaya Barat dan Papua Provinces,

Cooperation between PT KOGAS and Urban Studies Programme, Graduate

Programme University of Indonesia. 2007

8. Researcher: Spatial Planning Study for Samosir District base on Remote Sensing

and Geography Information System. Cooperation between PT Benattin Surya

Ciptaand Samosir District North Sumatera Province. 2006

9. Team Leader: Spatial Planning Detail for Maumere City, District of Sikka,

Province of Nusa Tenggara Timur. Cooperation between PT Sucofindoand

ocal Government of Sikka District Nusa Tenggara Timur Province. 2005

10. Researcher: Building Regulation, DKI Jakarta Local Regulation. Cooperation

between Direktorat Riset Penelitian Universitas Indonesia and BAPEDA

DKI Jakarta. 2004.

11. Researcher: Training Needs Assessment. Cooperation between Biro

Kemitraan Universitas Indonesia and Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup

Republik Indonesia. 2003.

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND SEMINAR

1. Presenter: International Coference: Whose Geography? Space, Place, Cultures,

and Environment of Asia. Sidewalks Function as Urban Life Symbols, A case in

JalanMargonda Raya, Depok City, Indonesia. South East Asia Geographer,

Singapore. November 2012.

2. Presenter: Internasional Seminar: Learning From Japan. Victim Annualy Flood

Adaptation Appearance, Kampung Melayu, Jakarta, a Case Study. Japanese

Studies Programme. Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta. Indonesia. February 2012.

3. Presenter: International Conference: Disaster and The On-Going-Recovery : A

Task for disaster's Politics or the Local Indegenous? Rebuild Urban Areas,

Cooperation between Government and Others. Japanese Studies Programme.

Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta. Indonesia. March 2012.

CVApril 2013 Page 4

4. Presenter: International Conference on Population Dynamism of Asia – Issues

and Challenges Ahead. Department of Geography University of Malaya. Kuala

Lumpur, Malaysia. July 2011.

5. Participant:Geographic Curricula, Benchmarking and Development. Fakultas

Geografi Universtias Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Juli 2011

6. Presenter: International Conference on Understanding the Changing Space,

Place, and Cultures of Asia. Southeast Asia Geographer Association. November

2010. Hanoi, Vietnam

7. Participant: International Conference Southeast Asia Metropolises and

Urbanization: Challenges and Tools in A Context of Climate Change. Indonesia

Planner Association. October 2010. Jakarta. Indonesia.

8. Participant: Consultative Regional Meeting for the Urban Poor. World Health

Organization. October 2010. Mumbay, India

9. Presenter: International Conference on Civic Space. Columbia University and

University of Indonesia. August, 2010. Jakarta, Indonesia.

10. Participant: Consultative Meeting on Public Health Professionals: Climate

Change and Health Impacts. A Parallel Event of the C.O.P. December, 2007.

Bali, Indonesia.

11. Presenter: National Seminar onPrimary Health Facilities. Ministry of Health

Republic Indonesia. February 2007. Jakarta, Indonesia.

12. Presenter: National Seminar on Public Private Partnership in Urban

Health.Ministry of Health Republic Indonesia. December 2006. Jakarta,

Indonesia.

13. Presenter: International Conference on Asia Scholar. August 2005. Shanghai,

China.

14. Presenter: International Conference on Asia Scholar. August 2003. Singapore.

15. Presenter: The Fifth International ECO-CITY Conference, August 2002.

Shenzhen, China,

TRAINING

CVApril 2013 Page 5

1. Training in: Penyusunan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi (KBK).

Participant. Universitas Indonesia. 2009

2. Training in: Pelatihan Ancangan Aplikasi (AA), Gelombang I tahun 2009.

Participant. Universitas Indonesia. 2009.

3. Training in: Pelatihanbagi Perencana Jenjang Fungsional Muda, sebanyak

dua angkatan, dengan berbagai topic. Maret – Juni 2006. Kerjasama antara

Pusbindiklatren Bappenas dengan Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan

Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi UI &Departemen Geografi UI. Trainer.

4. Training in: PelatihanbagiPerencanaJenjangFungsionalPertama,sebanyak

empat angkatan, dengan berbagai topic. Maret – Juni 2006. Kerjasama antara

Pusbindiklatren Bappenas dengan Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan

Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi UI &Departemen Geografi UI. Trainer.

5. Training in: PelatihanbagiPerencanaJenjangFungsional Muda, sebanyak

empat angkatan, dengan berbagai topik. Maret – Juni 2005. Kerjasama antara

Pusbindiklatren Bappenas dengan Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan

Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi UI &Departemen Geografi UI. Trainer.

6. Training for Trainers Diklat Fungsional Penjenjangan Perencana dengan

konsentrasi Manajemen dan Administrasi Publik. 2004. Penyelenggara

Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas

Indonesia (LPEM-FEUI) dengan Pusbindiklatren Bappenas. Trainer.

7. Training in: Pelatihan Penerapan Analisis Manfaat Resiko Lingkungan

(AMRIL) dalam Pengembangan Wilayah Urban. 2003. Judul Materi:

Compact City sebagai Pilihan Pembangunan Wilayah Perkotaan.

Penyelenggara Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia Kantor

Wilayah Sumatera. Trainer.

8. Urban Management, 2003. Judul Materi: Pengelolaan Wilayah Perkotaan

Melalui Analisis Perencanaan Keruangan. Penyelenggara Pusat Kajian Wilayah

dan Kota, Universitas Indonesia. Trainer.

9. SIG bagi Pengambil Keputusan, 2003. DepartemenGeografi FMIPA-UI.Trainer

10. Community Development, 2002 (batch 1 & 2). Penyelenggara Pusat Kajian

Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Indonesia. As steering commitee.

CVApril 2013 Page 6

11. Regional Planning, 2001 & 2002. Penyelenggara Badan Pendidikan dan

PelatihanPemerintah DKI Jakarta. Trainer.

12. ManajemenPemerintahan, 2001 & 2002. Penyelenggara Badan Pendidikan dan

Pelatihan Pemerintah DKI Jakarta. Trainer.

13. EkonomiPembangunan, 2002. PenyelenggaraBadanPendidikan dan Pelatihan

Pemerintah DKI Jakarta. Trainer.

Jakarta, 29 April 2013

NIP 1960 06 17 1987 03 2002

CVApril 2013 Page 1

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAIL

Name

Sex

Place and Date Birth

Address

Telephone (Home)

Occupation

Office Address

Office Telephone/Fax

E-mail

:

: Male

: Jakarta, 28 September 1971

: Jl. Tebet Utara IVC, No.11A. Jakarta Selatan (12820)

: (021) 8311941

: Lecturer

: Urban Studies at Kampus Universitas Indonesia, Depok

:

:

COURSES

1. Department of Antropology Undergraduate And Graduate Program, Faculty of

Social Knowledge And Politic Universitas Indonesia,

2. Urban Regional Studies Programme, Graduate Programme, Universitas Indonesia

3. Department Architecture, Undergraduate Program, Faculty of Engineering,

Universitas Pancasila

WORKING EXPERIENCE

1. FOUNDER: Jurnal “Hirarchi” Department of Architecture, Univeritas

Pancasila

Position : Publishing Executive

2. Consultan of Department Of Public Works

Responsibility : Pedestrian Road Infrastructure Assessment Plan

RESEARCH

1. Team Leader: Space Tolerance, Worship Space, and Settlement at Srengseng

Sawah, Jagakarsa, South Jakarta, 2011.

2. Team Leader: Desain and Structure of Bus-Sto, Jakarta. 2007-2008

CVApril 2013 Page 2

3. Researcher: Identification of Colonial Buildings in Semarang City Cooperation

Between Pusaka Budaya Bangunan Kota Semarang, 2006

4. Researcher: Mapping Location and Public Perceptions of PLTN Impact in

Cipayung Sub-District. 2012

PUBLICATION

1. 2008. Pedoman Penelitian Sederhana Untuk Arsitek. Direktorat Jendral

Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional & Jurusan Arsitektur

Universitas Pancasila. Jakarta

SEMINAR

1. Moderator: Living in Harmony with Green Psychology. September 2011

2. Speaker: Kebersamaan Stakeholder Membangun dan Megelola Kota. Tinjauan

terhadap Kasus Koja. April 2010

3. Speaker: “Arsitektur Tanda Tanya”: Mengungkap Jatidiri Arsitek dengan

Penguasaan Bidang-Bidang Keilmuan Lainnya. Host by Ikatan Arsitektur

Indonesia Cooperation Between Universitas Pancasila Jakarta

4. Speaker: Kepedulian Terhadap Bangunan Tradisional Indonesia, Khususnya

Bangunan Tradisional Sumatera Utara at Universitas Sumatera Utara.

5. Speaker: Makna Penggunaan Bahan Bangunan Alam pada Arsitektur Tradisional

Bali,” at Universitas Udayana Bali.

6. Speaker: “Menguak Langgam Bangunan-Bangunan Peninggalan Kolonial

Belanda di Kota Semarang”, Host by Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata

Semarang Cooperation between Ikatan Arsitektur Indonesia, Semarang.

7. Speaker: “Research Day” mengenai: Kebudayaan Komuniti Terstigma. Host by

Lembaga Riset FISIP UI.

8. Speaker: “Roundtable Discussion in Bandung,” mengenai: Hubungan antara

Kebudayaan dengan Pencapaian Nilai Kesehatan Masyarakat Kota. Host by

Depkes RI, Jakarta..

TRAINING

CVApril 2013 Page 3

1. Training in: Lokakarya Persiapan dan pelatihan 8 Studi Tematik Evaluasi

P2KP. Participant. Hotel Ambarawa. 2009

2. Training in: Pelatihan Digital e-Library dan Pengenalan Sistem e-Learning.

Participant. 2009.

CVApril 2013 Page 1

-CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAIL

Name

Sex

Place and Date Birth

Address

Telephone (Home)

Occupation

Office Address

Office Telephone/Fax

E-mail

:

: Female

: Medan, 20 June 1985

: Jl. Mansyur No.42 A RT.004, RW.007, Kel. Kebagusan,

Kec. Pasar Minggu, Jakarta Selatan

: +6221-3908264

: Researcher

: Jl Salemba Raya 4, Kampus UI Salemba, Jakarta Pusat

: 62 – 21 – 3908264

:

FORMAL EDUCATION

2009 - 2011 : Department of Geografi, University of Indonesia –

Jakarta, Master Degree.

2003 – 2007 : Department of Sosiologi, University of Indonesia –

Jakarta, Bachelor Degree.

RESEARCH

1. Researcher: Data collection and analysis for “Empirical Study of Growth and

Poverty Reduction in Indonesian Farm: the Role of Space, Infrastructure and

Human Capital and Impact of the Financial Crisis. UI – JICA. 2010

CVApril 2013 Page 2

2. Researcher: Pemetaan Wilayah Rawan Bencana di 9 Provinsi- Mapping of Risk

Prone Area in 9 Provinces (Jawa, Bali, dan Nusa Tenggara). UI – BNPB. 2011

3. Researcher: Need Assesment of National Development at Border Region. UI –

BNPP. 2012

4. Researcher: Investigating Jakarta Residents’ Preferences For Changes To The

Landscape Along The Ciliwung River: a Choice Experiment. UI – Future Cities

Lab Singapore (ETH Zurich) . 2013

CONFERENCE AND SEMINAR

1. Participant: Expert discussion: Overview Multiperspective, "Minimizing Flood

Impact in Jakarta. Universitas Indonesia. 2013.

2. Presenter: Towards Disaster Mitigation In Indonesia’s Cities-Learning From

Japan 4th Symposium 2012:Urban Society’s Vulnerability and Preparedness in

Disaster Mitigation In Indonesia and Japan. Universitas Indonesia. 2012.

3. Presenter: Characteristics of The Extended Built Up Area in Metropolitan

Medan, Binjai, Deli Serdang (MEBIDANG), Indonesia 1990-2006 –

International Conference of Geography, Kuala Lumpur. 2011

4. Participant: Adaptation Pattern based on Vulnerable Coastal Index Map Case

Study: Adaptation Through Community in Jakarta North Coastal International

Conference Southeast Asia Metropolises and Urbanization: Challenges and

Tools in a Context of Climate Change – Kerjasama Cooperation Between,

Universitas Indonesia, IAP, France Ambassador, Hotel JW Marriot, Jakarta. 2010

5. Presenter: Land Use Suitability Buildings As A Basis For Zoning Regulations in

South Tangerang Region. NationaConference of Insrastructure 2010 –

Cooperation Between UI,ITB, UGM, Depok.2010

6. Presenter : Implementation of Local Policies in Domestic Waste Water

Management in Jakarta, Case Study : Kelurahan Kebon Baru and Pasar Manggis,

Jakarta Selatan. International Seminar of Urban and Regional Planning,

Bandung. 2009

7. Presenter: Efficiency in Urban Area Expansion in Metropolitan Areas (Case

Study: Metropolitan Mebidang)Seminar Nasional Eco Urban Design at

Univesitas Diponogoro. Semarang. 2008

CVApril 2013 Page 3

8. Presenter: Spread of Potential Office Area at Dki Jakarta, Annual Conference

ASPI at ITS Surabaya. Surabaya. 2008

Jakarta, 28 April 2013

CV Aril 2013 Page 1

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAILS

Name

Place of Birth

Date of Birth

Sex

Marital Status

Religion

Address Home

Mobile

Email

:

: Jakarta

: July12th

, 1986: Male

: Single

: Catholic

: Jln. Gadung II No105 RT 05/ RW 03 PondokRanji

CiputatTimur,Tangerang,Banten. 15412 : 085694214703

:

FORMAL EDUCATION

2009 - 2011 : University of Indonesia – Jakarta, Master Degree,

Major : Human Ecology, Graduate School of Science

Environmental Department, GPA: 3.63 of scale 4.00

Magister Tehesis“HubunganKondisiFisikBangunanDengan

InteraksiSosialPenghuniPadaPemukimanVertikal”

2003 – 2007 : University of Indonesia – Jakarta, Bachelor Degree,

Major: Geography Faculty of Mathematic and Natural

Science, GPA: 2.88of scale 4.00

Final Project “Kualitas Air Tanah Dangkal di DKI Jakarta”

PUBLICATION

1. 2012.PendudukMiskindanLahanKritis di

Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan.JurnalKajianPengembanganPerkotaan Vol. 5

No. 1, April 2012: 24-35

CV Aril 2013 Page 2

NON FORMAL EDUCATION

February 14th

- 15th

, 2013 :Training Understanding and Implementing ISO 14001

– Certified by PT. Phitagoras Global Duta

February 15th

– 25th

, 2012 : AK3U Training (Kursus Ahli Keselamatan Kesehatan

Kerja Umum) – Certified by KEMENAKERTRANS.

Desember 18th

, 2011 :QHSE INTEGRATION (ISO 9001:2008, ISO

14001:2004 & OHSAS 18001:2007) Training –

Certified by Super Training Indonesia, Instructor –

International Auditor Ir. Koeswidijono, M.Sc

March2nd

– April4th

, 2009 : AMDAL Course and Taining – Certified by Centerfor

Research of Human Resources and Environmental

Postgraduate Programme University of Indonesia

(Training AMDAL B dari PPSML UI)

REWARD

1. 2012 : Piagam Penghargaan Peserta Terbaik 2 (Kedua) Pada Training Ahli

K3 Umum Held by PT Phitagoras Global Duta

SKILLS

Softwares: Expert in Arc View GIS, Microsoft Office,

Powersim Constructor (Environmental Modeling Software).

Softwares: Familiar inMapInfo, SPSS, Arc GIS, Adobe Photoshop.

Equipment:Geological Compass&GPS.

TOEFL: 527

Good in Leadership, Managing, and Team Work.

ORGANIZATION EXPERIENCE

2010 – 2013 : Member of Environmental Scholars Association (PERWAKU,

PerhimpunanCendikiawanLingkungan)

2006 – 2007 : Vice Chairman of Geography Study Club, University of Indonesia

2005 – 2006 : Chairman of Catholic Student Organization in Faculty of Mathematic

and Natural Science, University of Indonesia

CV Aril 2013 Page 3

WORKING EXPERIENCE

1. PT DIANZANI KONSULTAN (2012 - 2013)

Position : GIS Specialist

Responsibility : Spatial Analysis &Mapping for AMDAL Project

Highway Pekanbaru – Kandis – Dumai.

Highway Medan – Binjai.

Highway Lampung.

Road & Bridge Bukit Manula, Lampung – Bengkulu.

Highway Palembang –Inderalaya.

2. BAPPEDA KOTA DEPOK (2012)

Position : Environmental Expert

Responsibility : Action Plan in Sanitation Sector for Depok City

3. PT SENDIKA PERKASA MEGAUTAMA (2012)

Position : Safety and Environtment Consultant

Responsibility : Task Risk Assessment, Doing Audit Internal,

Implementing QHSE Integration, Making HSE

Program, etc.

4. BAPPEDA KOTA DEPOK (2011)

Position : Environmental Expert

Responsibility : Sanitation Management Planing (Strategic Sanitation

Planing) for Depok City

5. BAPPEDA KOTA DEPOK (2011)

Position : Environmental Expert

Responsibility : Sanitation Mapping (White Book Sanitation) for

Depok City

6. MR & PARTNER (Legal & Business Consulting Group) (2011)

Position : Environmental & Mining Expert

Responsibility : Environmental Case in Mining

7. KEMENTRIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP RI (2011)

Position : Reviewer

Responsibility : Adiwiyata School Award

8. MANGGALA BUANA UTAMA (2009 – 2010)

Position : Associate Researcher

Responsibility : AMDAL

CV Aril 2013 Page 4

9. JHL GROUP – Exploration Division (2008)

Position : Mapping and GIS Specialist

Location :

Gold Exploration in Geumpang,Pidie, Aceh

Coal Exploration in Kolang,Tapanuli Tengah, North Sumatra

Coal Exploration in Pinarik, Padang Lawas, North Sumatra

Coal Exploration in MosaJulu,Tapanuli Selatan, North Sumatra

Galena (PbS) Exploration in Melidi,Langsa, Aceh

10. PENTHINK PRODUCTION EVENT ORGANIZER (2008)

Position : Public Relation

11. UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA (2008)

Position : Data Collector for Center Statisctic in Faculty of

Public Health (Research for Formalin Rate in Tooth

Paste)

12. PT KOGAS (2008)

Position : Associate Researcher

Responsibilities : Analysis and Identification Needs of Lag Area

Infrastructure in Papua

13. Data Collector in Mapping of Bounded Area in North Jakarta (2007)

14. SARANA DIGITAL INDONESIA&DitJenMinerba ESDM RI (2007)

Position : Associate Researcher

Responsibilities : Research of Coal Mining in South Borneo

15. ERLANGGA PRINTING OFFICE (2007)

Position : Freelance Editor

16. UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA (2006)

Position : Associate Researcher for Center Statistic Faculty of

Public Health

REFERENCE

Prof. SarlitoWirawanSarwono (Mobile Phone: 0818181862)

Dr. Ir. SetyoSarwantoMoersidik, DEA (Mobile Phone: 0811861716)

RaldiHendroKoestoer, M.Sc. Ph.D, APU(Mobile Phone: 08161843323)

CV Aril 2013 Page 5

CV Aril 2013 Page 6

CV Aril 2013 Page 7

CV Aril 2013 Page 8

CURRICULUM VITAE

Personal Detail

Name

Sex

Place and Date Birth

Address

Phone Number

E-mail

:

: Male

: Bandung, 06 April 1991

: Gg. Duku I no 9A Jajar, Surakarta,

Indonesia : 62 812 830 839 92

:

Formal Education:

1. Urban Studies, Graduate Programme, Faculty of Graduate, Universitas Indonesia.

2013 – now.

2. Sociology, Undergraduate Programme, Department of Sociology, Faculty of

Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, 2007 – 2011.

3. State High School 2, Surakarta, 2004 – 2007.

4. MTs Modern Boarding School Assalaam, Kartasura, 2002 – 2004.

5. State Elementary School Medono VIII, Pekalongan, 2002.

6. Elementary School Pertiwi 3, Padang, 1996-2002.

Organization Experiences:

1. General Secretary of OSIS in 2 Senior High School Solo, 2005-2006

2. Public Relation of Sociology Summit, 2011

Academics:

1. Field Work on the forefront and bondary islands in Indonesia, Universitas

Indonesia, Sota, Merauke, 2010

Research:

1. Researcher: Method of Social Sciences. Sociology, Under Graduate Programme,

Universitas Indonesia, 2011.

2. Researcher: “Study About Characteristic of The Scavengers in South

Tangerang”. Lab Sosio Universitas Indonesia - Danone. 2011.

3. Researcher: “Investigating Jakarta Resident’s Preference for Changes to

Landscape Along the Ciliwung River: A Choice Experiment”. Urban Studies.

2013 – now.

Skills:

Software: SPSS, Microsoft Office

Working Experiences:

1. Lab Sosio Universitas Indonesia (2009)

Position : Data Entry Staff

2. Department of Antrophology (2011)

Position : Data Entry Staff

3. Lantan Bentala (2011)

Position : Project Officer of Pasukan Pemelihara Bumi (Earth

Keeping Forces)

4. Marketing Research Indonesia (2011 – 2012)

Position : Supervisor Field

5. Detikcom (2012)

Position : Journalist

6. Lab Sosio Universitas Indonesia (2013)

Position : Data Entry Staff

CV April 2013 Page 2

SEMINAR AND TRAINING

1. Seminar dan Pelatihan Pembuatan Peta Digital dengan Quantum GIS Untuk Perangkat

Desa

Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG). 2012. Trainer

2. Seminar Hari Air Sedunia

Pusat Studi Jepang UI. 2011. Participant

3. Strategi Kebudayaan untuk Kepemimpinan Masa Depan Bangsa Indonesia

Pusat Studi Jepang UI. Participant

4. Seminar Geography Days 2010: Menguak Rahasia Benua Atlantis "The Lost Continent

Finally Found"

FMIPA UI. 2010. Participant

5. Seminar Agrometeorologis

FISIP Universitas Indonesia. 2010. Participant

6. One day seminar “Global Positioning System (GPS)”

FMIPA UI. 2010. Participant

7. One Day Seminar “Privatisasi Air: Komersialisasi Air di Indonesia”

FMIPA Universitas Indonesia. 2010. Participant

SKILLS

Software : Arc GIS, Quantum GIS, And ENVI

Equipment : GPS

WORKING EXPERIENCE

1. Dinas Tata Ruang Kota Bekasi (2012)

Position : GIS Operator

Responsibility : Database RTRW Kota Bekasi

2. Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Bogor Regency (2012)

Position : GIS Operator

Responsibility : Database REDIS Kabupaten Bogor

3. Kementrian Perumahan Rakyat

Position : Surveyor

Responsibility : Mapping road of new housing at Batam, Kepualauan Riau

4. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Jakarta Utara

Position : Surveyor

Responsibility : Mapping green area at North Jakarta

CV April 2013 Page 1

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAIL

Name :

Sex : Male

Place and Date Birth : Karanganyar,17 January 1991

Address :Taman Griya Kencana Blok A5/26, Tanah Sareal, Bogor

Phone Number : +628562533241

Email :

FORMAL EDUCATION

2009 – Now : Student at Department of Geography, Faculty of Mathematic

and Natural Sciences, University of Indonesia

2006-2009 : SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar

2003-2006 : SMPN 1 Kebakkramat

1997-2003 : SDN 3 Kemiri

ACADEMIC

2012 : Joint Field Work University of Indonesia – University of Sydney,

Australia 2012 at Ciwidey and Toraja

ORGANIZATIONAL EXPERIENCE:

2010-2012 : Member at Kelompok Studi Geografi UI (KSG)

2010-2011 : Member at Himpunan Mahasiswa Departemen Geografi (HMDG-

UI)

2010-2011 : Reporter at Majalah Lintang 0 Departemen Geografi, FMIPA UI

27

Data Processing

Coding

Map Making

First Analysis

End of Analysis

Report Making

28

M. Budgeting Plan

Recap Expenses Percentage (Max)

I. Fees 0,30 $ 3.240,00

II. Stationary 0,10 $ 1.080,00

III. Data processing and collecting 0,60 $ 6.480,00

FEES (I)

Number of Person Months Fees Total Fees

Senior Researcher (2) 2 5 134 1.340

Junior Researcher (2) 2 5 110 1.100

Surveyor (2) 2 5 80 800

TOTAL I 3.240

SECRETARIAT (II)

Unit Set Unit Set Fee Total fee ($)

Stationery 1 Package 35 35

Photocopy 1 Package 5 months 25 125

Printer Ink Refills 1 Package 3 use 40

29

120

Papers 7 rim 5 35

Communication Fees 1 Package 5 months 50 250

The Difference by Inflation Rate 500 500

TOTAL II 1.065

DATA COLLECTION(III)

Unit Set Unit Set Fee Total fee ($)

Trip I (Pre Survey Trip)

Plane Ticket Jakarta - Maumere (Round-Trip) 3 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 150 900

Airport Tax 3 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 10 60

Car Rent 1 Package 50 50

Consumption 3 Persons 4 Days 10 120

Hotels 2 Rooms 4 Days 10 80

GPS rental 1 Device 4 Days 5 20

Trip II ( Investigation Trip)

Plane Ticket Jakarta - Maumere (Round-Trip) 6 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 150 1.800

Airport Tax 6 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 10 120

Car Rent 1 Package 100

30

100

Main Team Consumption 6 Persons 4 Days 10 240

Surveyor Consumption 2 Persons 17 Days 10 340

Main Team Hotels 3 Rooms 4 Days 10 120

Surveyor Hotels 1 Rooms 17 Days 10 170

Implementation of Local FGD 1 Package 2 use 70 140

FGD'S Speaker Fee 10 Persons 2 use 10 200

Souvenir Interview 10 Persons 1 10

Interview's Informant Fee 10 Persons 10 100

Local Guide Fees 1 Package 2 Persons 130 260

GPS rental 1 Device 4 Days 5 20

Video Recorder Rental 2 Device 21 Days 3 126

Trip III ( Overview Survey Trip)

Plane Ticket Jakarta - Maumere (Round-Trip) 3 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 150

900

Airport Tax 3 Persons 2 Tickets (Round-Trip) 10 60

Car Rent 1 Package 50 50

Consumption 3 Persons 5 Days 10 150

31

Hotels 2 Rooms 5 Days 10 100

Implementation of Local FGD 1 Package 1 use 70 70

FGD'S Speaker Fee 10 Persons 1 use 10 100

Data Processing

Renting a Place for Workshop 1 Package 2 Days 30 60

Total III 6.466

TOTAL (I+II + III) $ 10.771

SUMMARY

Local wisdom arise according to each specific location, especially its geographic elements, i.e. topography, climate, or typical conditions of its environment. Without the development of local wisdoms, communities could not revive from disasters which frequently occur any time. Local wisdoms are used as a means to adapt with their disaster prone environment, and help the local community to survive because of their extraordinary resilient nature. In disaster situation, programs were developed to facilitate victims and bring them back to their normal life. Evidence showed that this approach did not satisfy and accomplish the victims need. This research try to nourish the approach that has been developed by enhancing with cultural approach. Understanding culture as social capital might strengthen and stimulating the economic resilience programme. Based on its background and identification of problems, questions raised in this study include:

1 What kind of local wisdom that influence community social capital? 2 How social capital be able to strengthening the community economic resilience ? 3 How social capital implemented in economic resilience programme? 4 How is the linkage between social capital and disaster management regulation? Disaster is a nature incident that happened without clear warnings. People that lives in vulnerable

areas of disaster have early warning system that based on nature. They develop the knowledge base on experience and custom that inheritage from generation to generation. Today, local wisdom which is the substance of culture that lives in the community is not well understandable.

Culture is a unique footprint of a community. It prevents the community especially from external exposes. In facing disaster impact, culture is also community’s capacity. In preventing the community, culture could be dissected in two types, namely tight culture and loose culture. Tight culture composed of ritual, symbols and local wisdom that cultivate local knowledge. On the other hand, loose culture is function as potential source in involving outsider stakeholders. Loose culture provides opportunity to have a raltionships with outsider in creating social, economic and political intevention. In this research intervention is intended to flourish economic opportunity.

The team consists of experts from different areas. Widyawati is a geographer that expands her interest in human behavior, including adaptation and resilience in disaster situation. Septiady is an anthropologist. His expertise is in identification symbols and rituals as community power. Dom and Sondang are young scholars that develop their knowledge in human ecology and climate change issue as well.

Research methods used will be the qualitative method which is similar to the naturalistic inquiry characteristics. The focus of the study will involve people, groups, communities, programs, and patterns of relationship or interactions wherein all shall be viewed in its natural context (as is). The study is designed according to ethnography in the spatial context. Ethnography is understood as the central role of culture in understanding the way of life of the groups being studied. The spatial outlook will explain the geographic characteristics which develop local values adopted in the community. The study result will be scale up into local government policy and action programme as well.

Government of Indonesia Law No.24/2007 on Disaster Management. Several articles mentioning people’s empowerment, while several other are concerning on culture knowledge. East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) Province itself already has policy on disaster responses. These policies developed after the Tsunami event in 1992. In 2008 they issued Regulation No. 16 on Disaster Management Implementation. In 2009 they issued Regulation No. 16 on Regional Disaster Management Agency (Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah). Then the Regional Disaster Management Agency issued Decree of the Head of the Regional Disaster Management Agency NTT No. 2009 on combating Enforcement Agency Strategic Plan for Regional Disaster Year 2009-2013.

Regional Research Competition 2013

Toward a More Resilient Society

Application Cover Page

Reserach Proposal

Project Title : Local Wisdom as Basis of Social Capital in Strengthening Community

Resilience at Reroroja Village, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Total Budget : 10,771$

Project Duration : 5 Months

Research Team

No. Of Members : 6 persons

Project Leader

1. Name : MSP Institution : Urban Studies PostGraduate

Program, Universitas Indonesia Current Position : Lecturer

Highest Educ. Attainment : Master Degree

Nationality : Indonesia

Gender : Woman

Age : 53 years old

Mailing Address: Jl.Palem Raja II no 24 TamanYasmin Sektor 5 Bogor, Indonesia

E-Mail

Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +62-8164808150

Fax (Incl country + area codes) : 6221 – 3908264

Members :

2. Name :

Institution : Urban Studies PostGraduate Program, Universitas Indonesia Current Position : Lecturer

Highest Educ. Attainment :Doctoral Degree

Nationality : Indonesia

Gender : Male

Age : 42 years old

Mailing Address : Jl. Tebet Utara IVC, No.11A. Jakarta Selatan (12820)

E-Mail :

Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +6281908356420

Fax (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

3. Name :

Institution : Urban Studies PostGraduate Program, Universitas Indonesia

Current Position : Researcher

Highest Educ. Attainment : Master Degree

Nationality: Indonesia

Gender : Woman

Age : 27 years old

Mailing Addres : Jl. Mansur No 42 A, RT/RW : OO4/007, Kebagusan, Pasar Minggu, Jakarta

E-Mail :

Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +628159082829

Fax (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

4. Name :

Institution : Urban Studies PostGraduate Program, Universitas Indonesia

Current Position : Researcher

Highest Educ. Attainment : Master Degree

Nationality: Indonesia

Gender : Male

Age : 26 years old

Mailing Address :Jln. Gadung II No105 RT 05/ RW 03 PondokRanji CiputatTimur,Tangerang,Banten. 15412

E-Mail :

Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +6285694214703

Fax (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

5. Name :

Institution : Urban Studies PostGraduate Program, Universitas Indonesia Current Position : Postgraduate Student

Highest Educ. Attainment : Bachelor Degree

Nationality: Indonesia

Gender : Male

Age : 22 years old

Mailing Address : Gg. Duku I no 9A Jajar, Surakarta, Indonesia

E-Mail : Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264 Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +6285694214703 Fax (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

6. Name :

Institution : Department of Geography, Universitas Indonesia

Current Position : Undergraduate Student

Highest Educ. Attainment : High School

Nationality: Indonesia

Gender : Male

Age : 22 years old

Mailing Address : Taman Griya Kencana Blok A5/26, Tanah Sareal, Bogor

E-Mail : Phone (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264 Mobile (Incl country + area codes) : +6281381929967 Fax (Incl country + area codes) : +6221 – 3908264

APPROVAL LETTER

Hereby I acknowledge the research team to submit the proposals for the Regional Research Competition

(RRC) with the theme : Toward a More Resilient Society

Title of Research : Local Wisdom as Basis of Social Capital in Strengthening Community Resilience

Name of Institution

Team Coordinator

Member of Team

at Reroroja Village, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

: Urban Studies Postgraduate Program, Universitas

Indonesia :

:

Location of Study : Rerorejo Village, Magepanda Sub District, Sikka District, East Nusa

Tenggara Province, Indonesia

Number of budget : 10,771$

Jakarta, 29th April 2013

Head of Urban Studies Program