live animal evaluation beef nick nelson blue mt. community college ans 231 originated by kenneth...

19
Live Animal Live Animal Evaluation Evaluation Beef Beef Nick Nelson Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 ANS 231 Originated by Originated by Kenneth Geuns Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Michigan State University Revised 2009 Revised 2009

Upload: iliana-tamblyn

Post on 31-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Live Animal EvaluationLive Animal EvaluationBeef Beef

Nick NelsonNick NelsonBlue Mt. Community CollegeBlue Mt. Community College

ANS 231ANS 231Originated by Originated by Kenneth GeunsKenneth Geuns

Michigan State UniversityMichigan State UniversityRevised 2009Revised 2009

Page 2: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Fat IndicatorsFat Indicators

Tailhead & Pins

LastRibs

Brisket

Foreflank

Rear flank& Cod

Page 3: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Steer 1Steer 1

Page 4: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Steer 2Steer 2

Page 5: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

ComparisonComparison

Steer 1 - Choice Steer 2 - Standard

Page 6: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Market Beef Muscle IndicatorsMarket Beef Muscle Indicators

Loin

Quarter/Rump

Forearm

Stifle

Page 7: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Live Cattle EvaluationLive Cattle Evaluation

• Live Weight• Dressing Percentage• 12th rib fat• Rib Eye Area• Kidney, Pelvic, Heart fat (KPH)• Breed Influence • Quality Grade• Yield Grade

Page 8: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

WeightWeight

• Live or Carcass

• Live Weight range– 900 lb to 1500 lb– Avg: 1250 lb

• Carcass Weight range– 550 lb to 950 lb – 775 lb

Page 9: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Dressing PercentageDressing Percentage

• Proportion of live weight that ends up as carcass

• Example: 1250 lb steer with a 775 lb carcass has a dressing percent of 62%

• Range: 55 - 67%

• Avg: 62%

Page 10: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Factors Affecting Dressing %Factors Affecting Dressing %

• Gut Fill– Gut fill = Body Weight = Dressing %

• Hide weight and/or mud– Hide wt = Dressing %

• Muscle– Muscle = Dressing %

• Fat– Fat = Dressing %

• Dairy influence

Page 11: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

1212thth Rib Fat Rib Fat

• Highly correlated to retail yield

• Predictor of total carcass fatness

• Range: .15 in. to .80 in.

• Avg: .40

• .25 in. considered minimum

Page 12: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Rib Eye AreaRib Eye Area

• Highly correlated with lean yield

• Predictor of total carcass muscle

• Dependant of carcass weight

• Range: 9.0 - 18.0 sq. in.

• Avg: 12.5 sq. in. for 1150 lb steer

• Rule of thumb: 1.1 sq. in. for 100 lb live wt

Page 13: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

KPHKPH

• Internal fat as a percentage of carcass weight

• Continental cattle will tend to have less than British cattle

• Range: 1.0 - 4.5%

• Avg: 2.5%

Page 14: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Breed InfluenceBreed Influence

The use of genetic data has helped increase the animals ability to grade, however not all breeds grade equally.

• English Breeds: most consistent• Continental: tend to lack marbling, bad

attitudes stress out marbling• Brahman: thicker hide; tend to be low

marbling, decreased dressing %• Dairy: tend to be lean, but marble well

Page 15: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Quality GradeQuality Grade

• Assigned according to amount of marbling and bone maturity

• Most influential component of pricing

• Range: Standard to Prime

• Avg: Low Choice

Page 16: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

USDA Quality GradesUSDA Quality Grades

Page 17: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Factors Affecting Quality GradeFactors Affecting Quality Grade

• Genetics

• Age of cattle

• Time on feed

• Energy content of diet

• Fat cover

• Continental/ Brahman influence

Page 18: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Yield GradeYield Grade

• Calculated to predict yield of boneless, closely trimmed, retail cuts from the round, loin, rib and chuck (BCTRC)

• Based on 4 estimations– 12th rib fat– Hot carcass weight (HCW) – Rib eye area (REA)– Kidney, pelvic, heart fat (KPH)

Page 19: Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009

Yield GradeYield Grade

• Range: 1 through 5– 1 = Lean and/or Muscular; High cutability– 5 = Fat and/or Light Muscled; Low cutability

• Avg: 3.0