literature review i empirical analysis i - wabash college · literature review i ... theoretical...
TRANSCRIPT
--° cc- (-tk bsy kh.
S€: AJL
ifi4TS3
Final E aluat ion:J &1-r+. IliIb,j4.1piJ
Reviewers same:p —-
Authors Name: shii 4.froqC)
Referee Report Rubric7L,L ot1(’y
Paper Title: 15 eF oi-
,______________________________________________________
F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction
Clear statement of research question I
Literature Review IContent of lit reviewVOrganization of lit review
./__ —Citation usage and styleVTheoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section) IDiscussion of underlying theory
Empirical AnalysisThe_Data
Variable Description and Summary Data Table /Description of procedure for data collection: Data limitations and problems ooy-
Empirical ResultsDiscussion_of DGP’error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression results table
-‘7Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results
Explanation of a particular coefficientIIf Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities
1nr:’T it’ ‘
Appropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocon’elationLse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence inter\ al on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of resubs to previous work ( from lit review) :
—__________________Answering the research questi onConclusion
Summary of paperFuture work
References: Content and StyleOverall ASPeCtS of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (fiures, tables. look and feel)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things [hat Need Work:
6 V’A’( (C C C-•
Referee Report Rubric
Author’s Name: ‘;
Title and Abstract AA-
______________________________________________________ F Poor OK Good Super
Paper Title:
L&ppropriate functional forms used and explained
IntroductionClear_statementof research_question_i s__kLiterature_ReviewContent_of lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and svIe
VLTheoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy
Empirical Analysis• The Data
Variable Description and Summaiy Data Table VDescription of procedure for data collectionData limitations and problems
Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)
—Regression results table /,cVRounding_numbers_and_ease_hf reading_display
Inteireting Results \ -, (Explanation of a particular êoefficient
\/If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 1 VTnn1,,rnn ,,,,tc 4,, r,cr. ,c4n,,“D
“
IDiscussion of violations of CEM Ai- :, L____ VTesting for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationUse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis_rest_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit rev ie\4)Answering the research queslion
Conclusion:‘‘ d AI
Sumniaty of paper-Future work
References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWrit in
‘ Sr Ic (ttures, tables, look and feel)VBest Parts of the Paper:
/rr rç ‘,I CA
) L1vc’.Av( fQIJl ‘J
Things That Need Work:I. Cic C (LCM (.1.’( V .t ‘
2
Final E alum ion: Reviewer’s Name:
Referee Report Rubric
4
O
p.
-‘,-.4
Author’s Name: 1voi. Mñ+c.hav
Title and AbstractF Poor, OK’
Paper Title: ‘: k L’Good TsupiJ
______________
C .-f
:
IntroductionClear statement of research question
Literature ReviewContent_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation_usage_and_style
Theoietical_Analysis_(may_be_in_lit_ieview_section)Discussion of underlying theoiy
Empirical_Analysis
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableN/Description_of procedure_for_data_collection
Data limitations and problemsEmpirical Results
Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table
Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting_Results
Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientIf Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities
inflhl1.”Br.- ,nf 1i ,,rC.,,cc-:n,, C
Apprqpriate functional fonns used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationUse_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasricity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(ifappjicable)Discussion of economic importance
Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable’)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Ans_ering_the_research_question
ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work
References: Content and StyleO Cl till speLts of the Papei
(.ontent\“vntlng
Style (flutures. tables. look and feel)Best Parts of the Paper
fri‘
frL
Thints That Need Work:
Referee Report Rubric
Author’s Name: —
Final Evaluation:
Paper Title:
\Z
Rev ie wer s Name: I .Y-t-t -c )‘
.
-- IF Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction
Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature Review
Content_of lit_reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usane and style
Theoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section)Discussion_of underlying_theoiy
Empirical Analysis / .
The DataVariable_Description_and_Summaiy_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs) v7
Regression results tableRounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_display
Interpreting Results SIExplanation of a particular coefficient SI
If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 1Including units in discussion of variables tAppropriate functional fonns used and explained -JDiscussion of violations of CEM S..,’
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelation[se_of robust_SEs_(ifheteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable) SIConfidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(ifapplicable)Discussion_of_economic_importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) VComparison of results to previous work ( from lit review) ‘IAnswerinu the research question
Conclusion 7Summary_of paperFuture work
References:_Content_and_Style-
JO\Llall ‘\spects ot the Papei —‘
ContentWritingStyle (uures. tables, look and feel) 1
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:
Referee Report Rubric
‘ TIntroductionClear statement of research question -1
Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usae and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy
—
Empirical AnalysisThe_Data
Variable_Description_and_Summaiy_Data_TableDescription of procedure for data collection JData limitations and problems —
Empirical ResultsDiscussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression results table ‘V
Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results
Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientIf Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities
Including_units_in_discussion_of_variablesAppropriate_functional_forms_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing_for_h eterosk edasticity_or_autocorrelationTi se_of robust_SEs_(if lieteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review)Answermg_the_research_question
, ConclusionSummaiy of paperFuture work
References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (tgures, tables, look and ftel)
Best Parts of the Paper: . Things That Need Work:
Author’ s Name: Paner Title:@ F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and Abstract
______ ______ ______ ______
‘/
Final Evaluation: Review er’s Name: — a
Referee Report Rubric
Author’s Name:5COfcQe)/
Title and Abstract
______________________
Introduction
______ __________________________
Clear statement of research questionLiterature Review
Content of lit reviewOrganization of lit review
_____________________
Citation usage and styleTheoretical Analysis (may hem lit review section
Discussion of underlying_theory
________
Empirical AnalysisThe Data
_____________
Variable_I)escription and Summary Data TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData limitations and problems
Empirical Results
__________ _____________
Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table
Rounding numbers and ease of reading displa’Interpreting Results
Explanation of a particular coefficientIf Dummy I)ependent Variable, predi
Including_units in discussion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and cxiDiscussion of violations of C EM
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrel ation
Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity presenFI lvpothesis test on estimated coefficient (ifConfidence interval on estimated coefficient (ifDiscussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicableComparison ol resuhs to previous work (from lit reviewAnswering the research question
ConclusionSummary of paper
__________________________________
Future workReferences: Content and Sty IcOverall_Aspects of the Paper__________
ContentWriting
_____________
Style (figures, tables, look and feel)Best Parts of the Paper: hings l’hat Need Work:
Oç--t tk’ v1/qr(Pc)4hd$)
c C 1 J -‘ ceq.Final Evaluation: DL- Reviewcr’s Name:
________
.
—
cc‘S.
0 CD
I)
(-)
0 C)
C,’ 0
- CD C,
c-f)
0 LI
CD
c-)
CD CM C,
CD CD Cl) 0 CD LI
Ct’
CD (D CD cl-C 0 CD C (1)
CD
i-f)
Ct’
CD (ID CD CM 0 CD CD
H LI
CD -t
Z)
—C
CM --C (1 C (t Cl,
CD -J 0 CD CM C 0
LI
-J
LI
C)
CD Cl)
CM
-t
CD LI
(CC
CD Cl)
C-
Cl)
Cl) CD Cl)
CM C) C -“-C
CD CD C) -C C C’
:
LI
-C CD CD
CD J Ct
Cr)
CM C CD CM C CM C,-
CD
‘7j
C,
CD > CM CM
Cl) CD Cl)
CM 0 C C C C Cl) 0 C-)
LI
C 0.
C-
C) 0 -
C
H CD z C 0 CM CD
CD C I— ( CD --C CD
C C -J
CM -C LI o C,-
CD CM
-I DC)
DC)
C 0 C,
C C-C DC)
LI)
CD C CD 0 CD CD CD -C C-
C)
J)
(.1)
C’-
’
(‘C
’)
C.)
Cl)
Cl; C) C) C-C
CD)
CD C/c
0 LI
CD C l)
C C --C CD -I-
C DC)
C Cl) DC)
CD DC)
C-
Cl)
C -C- CD
CM CD C CM -t Cl) rti C
l)
-4)
CD CD CM CD C-’
DC)
CM CD LI
C Cl) CD -C C-
C DC)
Cl) C C 4’J
C Cl) Cl;
C LI
C -C C Cr.
‘I CD CD -C’
C LI
DC)
C LI
DC)
C-
CD LI
DC)
DC’)
C C LI 0 C-)
CD C!) C)
C— -4
-)
LI
LI
CD DC)
—C
CD
0 DC)
LI N DC)
C C LI C C-
CD -C’
CD
Cl)
CD Cl)
CM C C -4)
C-
LI C-)
CD LI
-I CD 0
-C C-
CD CM CM CD CM C-.
C CD C,,
C DC)
C-
CD C CD 0 CD C)
CD C-.
-i-C
DC)
CD DC)
C,-
CD-C
’
C C,
LI
DC)’
CD LI
CD C.
C DC)
-4)
C LI
Cl)
CM CrC C C-
CD C,
DC)
CD
H CD CM C-.
LI
-4)
CD C-
CD o Cl)
—‘C CD 0 CM C-. CD DC)
C CD C 1 CD DC)
C
C C-
CD CD CD LI
‘-C
CD DC)
C LI
CD Cl)
C-
LI
,2 DC
)C
-CD C CD C C
t
CD CD Ct
-4)
DC)
LI
LI CD DC)
C,-
CD
CC)
-r
C-I
DC)
‘i-C
I -4)
LI
CD - DC)
LI
CD I a r
C C 0 LI
C-’ C,
CD CM DC)
LI C-
CD DC)
CM CD C C-4
)
C DC)
C C-
Cl) LI
DC)
C-
CD CM CD LI C C C-)
LI
CD CD C-
CD C DC)
-t
DC)
CD C CD CD C
DC DC)
C,-
CD 0 CD (I,
CD cC,
C.
C (ID
C-
LI
LI
DC) C DC)
DC) H DC)
C-
CD
C -4)
C C, CD LI
CD LI
C-
CD C DC)
C,-
CD C C C-
CD C-
CD C-
C,
C,
DC)
C,
C-.
CD Cl)
CD CM CD C, CD LI
C C -C’)
C Cl) CD DC)
C C C CD CM C C,
H C,-
CD C CD ‘--C CD DC
)
LI DC)
CM CM DC)
C-
CD LI
C C C-
CD Cl)
CD CD C-
0 LI
0 CM CD CM CM C C 0 C 0 C.
CD LI
LI
LI 9 DC DC)
LI
C- 0 -C CM
CD -C CD CM z DC
)
CD
-C C C Cl; z DC)
CD DC)
CD H CD
LI
C
-n 0 C
LrE
0
Tr’.e_ Recr’J— etJ‘u -- -i-k;s
—
Author’s Narne:jc,cpt v
Title and Abstract
Referee Report Rubric
Paper Title: A F. F Poor OK Good Super
d
.-
r IntroductionClear statement of research question
Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theory
—
Empirical AnalysisThe Data
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_Table: Description of procedure for data collection
Data limitations and problemsEmpirical Results
Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table ><
Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting Results
Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientif Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 2<
Including units in discussion cf variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of C’EM
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation >Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) >K.Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion_of economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(it’ applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering the research question X
ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work
References: Content and Style “>(Overall_Aspects_of the_Paper
ContentWriting —
Style (figures, tables, look and feel) ‘KBest Parts of the Paper: Things That >eed Work:
x
rn.f, Lr. iH)( 1-, cZo’r’(.S
iA sç’c iy,CQ. )r.
Final Evaluation: C Reviewer’s Name: JoeL Wh 1fon
:
00 CD 0
1 CD 0 7—
(-I)
0 CD
CD -4-
CD C -J
CD C,) 0 CD -J 0-
(ID
CD
CD C Cl;
CD 1J 0 0 7-
CD
Lf
CD ‘-4
(D C Cl) CD 0 I— CD Cl)
-4-
CD C ‘-4-
jc CD Cl) Cl)
m C)
CD Cl)
C,)
Cl) C)
Cl)
Cl) C C CD C) C 2 C -J C)
C) CD
CD C Cl)
Cl)
C Cl) Cl)
CD
Cl) C)
Cl)
C,) 0 C -4-)
0 -t 0•
Cl) C m
m C) > DC)
C’) Cl)
n -4 C) C -J
C CD L •1
rt
CD -4-
CD CD CD
-I-i
—a
DC) m C CD CD -C CD C
l) / CD
DC)
‘-4-
DC)
-a DC
)
C -J
Cl) DC
)-a 0-
C-
CD --a
-J Cl)
C DC)
Cl) C C CF)
C If)
rt C C Cl)
-a
-a 0 C -a CD
(1 0-
Cr) (,) 0 C)
-4-)
DC5 a (P C,”)
ri-i
C-a
-J DC
)
0 C -4-J DC
)
C-a
DC)
C)
-4 C) C CD C)
CD 0 -4
C C -t DCa)
C ‘-S 0-
CD >: C DC)
—a
DC)
C —a C (P i--a)
Cl)
-4 C-)
-‘))
DC)
C ‘—a
CD 0 C-
(—)
DC)
C -J
Cl) p.)
CD DC-)
-S 0-
Cl) CD
If)
CD C —4--
a
C Cl) (ID ri-
i
4)
(P CD Cl) 5-
(P 0-
DaD
Cl) C-)
U CD If)
CD —a
d rt -a CD Cl)
C’) (tI
Cl) C CD C,)
-4
-S DC
)CD 0-
C) 0 CD -4-a
C-)
(P ‘-4-
-4-)
--a
‘--a C-) p.)
CD
H CD Cl)
Jc CD -4 CD If) 5-
(P 0-
Cl) C-)
DC)
C -t C C-)
rt5 pa)
-4 C -S
> U-a C c-a
0 CD —-a
C)
-t C C DC)
--a
Ii)
Cl) CD ‘-N 0-
CD x DC)
CD 0-
C --a 0-
CD C)
CD I- CD i-as
C CD Cf-a CD 0-
C-)
C CD -4--
a
C-)
CD -J DC
)C C C
) C-a
CD U—
CD)
Cd-, -C If --a
CD i-a)
c-A (I;; H (3
D CII H 0 / CD (El
0-
C
C 0-
-S JC -J C-
CD (‘as DC
)
0-
CD DC)
Cl) CD C -s--
a
p.) p.
0-
Cl)
c-a
DC)
-a
CD Cl) C)
--a -4-
C C -4--
a
-J C)
CD 0-
-a CD - 0-a
DC)
i--a)
C) C CD C-)
-4-
0 -e
p.) C-
CD CD Cl) C) C C -J 0 (ID --a
-S -a --a
pa)
‘-4-
p.) H DC)
C-
CD
-fr-
a
—S
a-a
—a
CD c-A CD 0-a
CD DC DC)
C-
CD C C 01-a
CD CD 0-
C C-a
i-a)
C -4-
- ci’
CD DC Cl)
p.)
CD CD C I-f)
Cl) CD p.)
C 0 CD Cl’) C C
Cl) C-)
Cl)
Cl)
C C -4)
CD C -t (P --a
-J
-J 2 (-) C DC)
C —a
-J > Cl)
-)
-J CD C C —4-
-
C)
p.)
-J p.)
Cl)
Cl)
p.)
C-
CD —a
-t
C -a CD Cl) CD C)
r-f
C
0 p.P
a)
--a
N C -J C -4-)
C —a CD
C’
H -J CD p.)
-4-
p.)
L.
‘I’
0 C CD ‘-4
-
0 -4-)
rt CD 1!
Cl) C-)
a— Cl)
Cl)
0 -J C -4--
a
-J 0-
Ct
-S SQ 1-4
-
-S CD C a
I. DC)
‘--a CD H I-f
CD
C ‘-a
—---
4-
CC
0.
0
,;_yo 7-
i
-—
------—
—-—
-u
Referee Report Rubric
\j
- d a I I L I. a -
Author’s Name: x Paner Title: +-- F Poor OK Good Super
Title and AbstractIntroduction
Clear statement of research question 4Literature Review L
Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy
Empirical AnalysisThe Data
—
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empirical_ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs) /Regression_results_table
Rounding numbers and ease of reading display 7—Interpreting Results
Explanation of a paiicular coefficient c.If Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities
Including unhs in di5cusion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationLse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_( if applicable)Discussion_of_economic_importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity ( if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit re iew)Answering_the_research_question
ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work
References: Content and Style—
Overall L\spects of the Paper —ContentWritingStyle (figures. tables, look and feel)
• Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:
Final Evaluation: 0 Revie\ver’s Name:
1— Referee Report Rubric
Paper Title:
Reviewer’s Name: oft/’.//
Author’s Name: 5ky fr’F Poor OK Good Super
Title and AbstractIntroduction
Clear statement of research_questionLiterature Review
Content_of lit_reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation_usage_and_style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying_theory
Empirical AnalysisThe Data
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Darn_TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM or Random_Xs)Regression results table
Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting_Results
Explanation of a particular coefficient
Including units in discussion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation ‘y -______
Use_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticily_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) yDiscussion of economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(if applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering_the research_question
ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work
References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and feel)
L
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:(9(€$ o-P 4iri.i (tfii-ewf
)I’.A.
Final Evaluation:
ji! ,.; fl4L(/7Lf’t4/A
,iJuL 1-’f
(ovL/LAeP
- I
Ye,i/ MPi(e/ 1U.1 ,‘i A)euL 1-”
Authors Name: S&,IJ
Referee Report Rubric
Tit1e and Abstract
Paper Title:F Poor OK Good Super
IntroductionClear statement of research question I
Literature_ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usage and style V
‘ Theoietical Analysis (may he in lit ie iew section)
Discussion of underlymg theoiy
Empirical_AnalysisThe Data
Variable Description and Summary Data Table
Description_of procedure_for_data_collection
Data_limitations_and_problems
Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)
Regression_results_tableRounding_numbers_and_ease_of_reading_display
lnteireting_ResultsExplanation_of a_particular_coefficient
If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities
Including units in discussion of variables
Appropriate functional forms used and explained-j
Discussion of violations of CEM
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation
Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) -LHypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)
Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)
Discussion of economic importance
Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)
Comparison of results to previous work from lit review)
Answerin the research question
ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work
References: Content and Style
Overall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and fel)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:
.:
.C -J
CM C
C
,‘,3
_
--:
C’
-J (1)
-J
-3
-4.
C (2 -3 CD
0 C:’
CD CD Cf C’
em)
CD -3 CD
CD Ct
4’ C (‘C CD CM 0’
CD C,-,
— CD
—3
C:’
CD Cr, C3 (‘C Lf( C C’
C em CV
CD
H -J CD
> CM (1 —3
CD CM (0 C (0 Li., em C
em CD (0 -t
CD CM CM
ri -3
-J
-3 CD C CD Li,
CM
-4C
,—
T..
C-.
V
-
- •,-
.41
— C)
V., C C
/C CM C.
-3 C -C)
CD C:-)
C -3 C C:-)
C C C:)
CD
CD (t (‘C (‘C C -4
Cl)
em CM C CD
ii CD C C CM CM
CM CD CM CM C C -4 0 C C:)
CM C em
)
c-fl
-J em em em CD -f C -J
C H CD —4
03
C CM C CD C-f
C C C C’
C C--’
CD CD C Ct’
CD CD -4 -t
CD C em CD CD 3- CD
C m 3- C em 0 CD CD (0 Cl
)
C CD
(I)
CD C em)
C3 CM (1)
CM em)
CD -t CD CM C’=
C CM em CD C C/C CD
C em C C-f C CM C 0-
C-) C-
CD -3 CM
C)
j.: 03
IC C-‘C
Ci,
C.”) C:)
C-.) em
)
C-
C:0
CI)
C CD 0 em)
CD -3
3-
()
C -3 CM C JQ CD PC)
C 0-
CM CD
C C C CM --3 C’
—4
(0 CM CM C C CD -3 C’
CM 3- C em
)
C —4 CD CD -
4
C-.)
C C-)
em C em C PC)
0 CD x C--,
-3 C em C C (0 C CM CD —4
C C-)
CD PC)
CD
C -3 N C C --3 C --4
( 3- CD
H CD CM -4 C -J CD rt CD C,) (0 03
C CM em CD —4
C C em C CD C -4 CD PC)
C-f C -4
C C -3 CD CD em C PC)
-3 CM CM CD 0-
-4 C-
CD C-) DC
)
C CD 0-
Cl)
CD C-
CM Cl) C C C -4 03
CD -‘PC
C-f
-4 CD 0 -J
C C C-f
1 (0 CM CM CD CM rt C CD CM em -3 C C-f CD CD C (U CD CD -
4
—3
C C C CD C-
CD
C Ci
0- (0 CD CD -C CD -4 PC
)
C CD CM -4 C CD em CD C CD CD CD C C CD PC)
C-
CD
CD CM -w CM C CD PC)
CL
DID CM H PC
) z CD (0 0-
C
CD CM CD C em C C C-)
C CD CD 0-
CD d. C PC)
CD 0 CD CD C-f C -3
C C 0-
--3
-‘C -3 C-
CD CM PC)
0-
CD C CM CD C C U’)
0-
‘PC 0-
C)) C C
C C-
CD CD CM CD -4 em 0 C em L/D
C em C H C-
CD
C-)
em -4
-3
-4 CD ‘-3 CD 0 CD C-f
PC C C-
CD C C 0-
CD -t
CD 0 —-4 d C PC)
C-
CD CM
CD CM em CD -3 (0 2 C CM CD CD 0 em (IC CM C -3
CM CD em CM CM C -4 C 0 -3.-
(r C-f
CD ‘-C CD C-.
)
C C —4 0-
C -3 >< CM
H -3 CD C CD PC)
PC)
CM CM -4 C3 CD --3 CD Li)
CD CD em C.
-4
3)
‘C
-4.—
‘C:. --
p-’
—3
;C
9- ?I’ -
£
C_C
‘,
—C
•-2
-
-DC
‘-4
-.
;5,
-:
.?..
-:t
)C’
—-
.4’-
DC -.4
z0
‘—
“-,
em C CM z C C CD c3 .2 5
-2 -7 .
-1
-w PC)
C CD H CD
9
‘-4
‘S
‘c_
c
C)j
c-w C C
;
2
.4.4
-.c
,..
,c
3)
L
—V
. -9
0 0 0 C C if,
C j CD -tS
1-1-
;‘3.13I\
-
4*
-‘c
,—‘-
4,(’
.:c-
-c-’
2,
Ct’
Referee Report Rubric
F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction
Clear statement of research question o{Liteiatwe Re iev
Content_of lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discuss ion of underlying theory
Empirical AnalysisTheData
Variable Description and Sumrnaiy Data Table VDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData limitations and problems —
Empirical Results : —
Discussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression_results_table
Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayterpreting_Results
Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientif Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities
Including_units_in_discussion_of_variablesAppropriate_functional_form s_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_( if heteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) —
Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) - —
Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review) —
Answering the research questionConclusion
Summary_of paperFuture_work
References:_Content_and_StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and feel)
Best Parts of the Paper:0c
.
Author’s Name: Lrry G1fe1J Paper Title:
eA w5
Things That \eed Work:
Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name: iJ n’w-V
VCC,)
\L
I.
C)\
C)
cD0
--—
-—
-‘
SI
C)C
)c1
l\
z©I-’
CID)
4-
LI
Hci)C)C
e
0S..)Ce
z(ID
0
1”C0-a(IDa)CCe
ci)(ID9)C)4-.)
ci)
LI4
-’C
e4-’
(IDCeci)
c-)
ci)
-DCe
HCe
4-a
Ce
Ce
Cl)
-C)Ce
-o4-a
4..LI(IDci)
ci)-C
)Ce
>
CC)
LIci)(IDci)
9)4—
ci)-C
)>Ce
4-
(ID(IDCe
4-
LI9)C)LI
H
(ID1LI
CeC)
wUci)
CLI)04--
C)(ID(IDC-)(ID
0
ci)
zCI,
a)
ci)>ci)
0CC
UiCe
(IDci)
-C)Ce
24-
-C)LI
4-’
LI
-C)9)4..
ci)-C
)Ce
4—4-
ci)‘ILIci)
4-
I4-
C)0
.5•1
4-.)
LI
4-a
(ID-C
)
-C)Ceci)
4-a
F-
4-
C)C-)
ci)
C)C)
Ce
-C)
(
ci)
-C)II)C
-)C)I-C)C)C0C)(IDci)
0
CeC)(IDCf4-
-ci,C
e9)C)ci)(IDCCci)
-C)Ce
LI
C’
-C)
‘S
.
\5
-
S
-S
‘-S
‘5k-
“
4’
5-
)N
4..
H:‘4
C-)“‘
ci’
C
C
—5-
(I)
(ID
-e4-
CCci)C’C
e(ID4
-
0U
C)5-.)
ci)ci)
/LIDCI)
ci)C)..
‘Li
4-a
C)(ID
CC(I)ci)
a)
-C)CCC)
4—4-CC
5—ci)
LI
4-
1)C)LI
ci.)
CC
4—.
(IDci)
C)CC4--
ci)4-
ci)L
I
ci)-C
)
‘C)U
)
-C)ci)
4-
CC4-
I)
-C)CC5)
ci)(ID(ID4
-
‘C)
-4-
CCC)LI
4-
ci)
Ce
C)C)4-
C)ci)4
.a
4-
ci)-C
)4-
-a
(4-
0C)(ID4IDC)
(ID
0
4--
C)Ceci)
C)LI
C)4
-a
Ce
C)C-)
(IDCe-eLI‘I
(IDC)ci)4
.-a
ci)IC
l4-
4-’
(IDci)H
ci.)-C
)LI
C)4-
Ce(4
-
-aci)
LI
C-aci)C)L
I
-C)ci)
-aCC4-
LIDci)C)(IDci)4
-.)
(ID
(IDci.)
4-a
0C)4-
1)
-C)LI
4-
Ce
(4-
5—4-
4-a
LI
(IDCe
ci)
04-
C)Ce
4-
LI
-e4-
Ce
4-
C)Ce-a
4-
C)U
4-
4-
ci)C)
9(CC)(I.)
C)9)C)
‘IDLI
C-C)CC)(IDC)C)
U
-4
.
4-
LI
LI
(4--
C)4.-a4
-
LI
CU
(.4•)
ci)
Ci
(DC
C-C)
C)c/c(/)
c-I(I-)
‘I
LI
C
Cci)L
I
ci)C)L
I
LI
CCC)Ce
C-C)4-
C)4—
)CC4-
CC4-
Ui
(IDCci)
-C)94-’
-C)4-
CC(ID4-
C)4-.)
Ce
4-’
Ce
u-b
CC
0
4-
LI
(IDC)4-
LI
u-b
(IDCCC)LI
(IDCaLI
ci)
(ID
Cl)
4.-’(ID-J
-D9(4-
C)ci)(ID
4-
4--
LI
-4.
LI
9)4.—LI
4—
C)LI
-C)
-a4-
(ID(IDCCCCe
LI
4-
Ui
U(4-
C)(IDC)CCC)4-
(4-..C)4-
C)(ID(ID-a
LI
(ID
0
ci)L
ICCCC)4-
C)
C)4-
C)C)
C)C
-C)C)(ID(IDCC.)DID
0
(ID(IDL
I
Cl4-
9)4-
ci)
(ID(IDLICCL
I
4-
Ui
4-
C)a-a
(IDLIC’
LI
CCci)(ID9)ci)
a—’
4-
ci)(ID
CC
0ci)a
H
LI
CC(ID(IDci)
C)(ID(ID9)LI
LIcC)-4
-
LI
C)LIDC
)
-C)(ID
9)C)
(I)
ci)4--
C.,)
-DCC
LI
4..)
4-
0ULIDci)L
I
LIci)
LI
4-LI
(4--C)(IDL
IC
)4Th
(ID9)
LI
C)CC4-
C-C)CCCCl)
C(/DLI
C)-I
C)4-
9)a-L
I
C)U
CI
4—
U
Referee Report Rubric
Authors Name: ‘C( t)Q- Paper Title: C’__flLJvt’ ir&1F Poor OK 1 Good Super
Title and Abstract - / —
IntroductionClear statement of research question — /
Literature ReviewContent_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy
Empirical AnalysisThe Data
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems
mpirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression_results_table
Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results
Explanation_of a_paiiicular_coefficientIf_Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabil ities
lncludinu_units_in_dscnssion_of variablesAppropriate_ftinctional_fonns_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Disc ussion_of_economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of_elasticity_(if_applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering_the_research_question
C onclusionSummary_of_P1Pe1Future_work
References:_Content_and_StyleO ci all Aspects ot thL Papei
ContentWriting 1Style_(figures,_tables,_look_and_feel)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:iVivj 4pic- 9
Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name: tri)
.C
) C)
-j
C 0
C) m C)
C)
-y C-’
-J C) C) -d C)
CD
CD C)
Cr, C) CO C)
LI
CD
CO C::
CD -J C)
CD C) CD -J C) C)
CD
CF)
CO (0 (C:
C) 0 CD (ID C) C) CD CD
H CD D C)
C)
> CC:
(0 -) (0 C,) (0 C) C) (C)
C,) C)
-I C) C)
C)
CD Cl]
(I)
CD C () (I) C) C CC:
-t
(ID C) 0 CD
CC:
C)
Cl)
Cl) C) C) CD C) C) C, C)
-J C) C)
C)
(0
(C:
C)
(I)
(ID C) C) C) C)
C)
(ID C) (-) rn
CD (15 CD CD
C C)
C)
-I C) C) (ID C)
-) C)
-I 0 CD C,)
C) -I CD C) CD CD
H CD -J C)
0 (1)
C)
C)
C-.
,
j-:
C-,,
)
C)
Ct)
C-,,) () C) C) (C)
LID
nj x C) C
)-J C) C) 1 C) C)
LI
C)
C) C) C) 0 CD C.)
CD -J
C)
C) -J
C’) C) CD C)
‘-I C)
(ID CD C) 0 C’) C,)
C),
)
CD (0 d Cl) CD C)
C)
C).
)
C) C) C LID CD
C C) (ID C C) C (ID C,, C) C) C C)
Cl) C) (C;
CD
C) LI
C-
-t
C) C) C) C)-
CD LI
C)
DC)
C) C) -C
)
CD C)
Cr
C)
-t
C)
LI
LI
C-)
C) C)-
CD -.-
DC)
-J N C)
C-.
C) -J C) C-.
( —C CD
H CD Ct) CD C-.
CD o Cl) CD C)-
C) Cl) C)
C) C) C) C -4 CD C) -t C b1
-I C) C-
-J (0 C,)
Cl.)
rf (C)
Cl]
C-, C) -d (C)
C))
-C DC)
CD C)-
C) C) CD C ii
C)
CD —C
rt
C)
C)
C)
C-
CD
LI
LI
LI
CD C)
C) —C
LID
C)-)
CD C)
-C Cm CD -d DC
)
C) CD
C C)) C-)
(I)
C,) C) C) —C
C)-
CD C) -J CD 0
C) C))
CD C.:
CD -t
CD -i C) CD CC:
C-’
-J C)
CD n C-,
C) (C)
C)
CD C)
C LI
C-)
C) C-
CD
C) C)
C) C) -C C)-
(0 Cf C) _
C C)-
CD C) LID CD C) -C
)
C C) C)
C)
Cl)
—C
DC)
C CD Cl) C C) C) -J C) -C
)L
I
o C)
CD C)
C-.
C C)-
C)
C) C) C) CO C) C) -J
DC)
C-
CD C CD C,) C)
-I -t
C)
DC)
-C C)
C/)
C DC-) C C) C) H C)
C-
CD
-CD C -
J-C CD -I CD C)-
CD -C -t
DC C) C-
CD LI
CC;
C)-
C)
C-
CD C)
-I 0 C)-
C) C)
C-
CD C,)
CD C)
LI) CD -J (0 C) -C
D
Cl’
C)-) CD C)
C)
C)
C-
CD C,, C)
U).
C) (I)
(I) C) -J C) C-) C CD -4 C) C-. CD 9 C) m C) C)-
C) -C -C >< Cl)
C— C) Cl) z C) CD -C :5—
CD (0 C C)) C) ii
:!::::
::::::
:::::z
::zz:
::::::
:zo::
::
C) CD
etC etC etC
etC 0 3 —
‘Ct I L
C) C) CD H C-.
.‘,
C’
\ s—-
-
Referee Report Rubric
Author’s Name:
LTitancLbstract
The DataVariable Description and Summary Data Table
Paper Title:I F Poor OK Good Super
IntroductionClear statement of research question
Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit review
Citation usage and styleTheoretical Analysis (m
Discussion of Linderlying theory
Empirical Analysis
/
Description of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empiiical Results IDiscussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression_results_table
Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting_Results
Explanation of a particular coefficient .1if Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities j1 1 1 1 . FAppropriate_functional_forms_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of C’EM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_(if_heteroskeclasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) —
Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_( from_lit_1’evie\)Answering_the_research_question
Conclusion
L Summary of paperFuture work //
References: Content and Style—
Overall Aspects of the PaperContentWriting 7
Style ( tgures. tables, look and ted)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:
Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name:
.
-
‘‘
o-
L:
-—
-‘‘)
--I’
——
—I—
s3--
;_
r“I
PI:;
Cl)
—--
:
--
-s—
.,—
o-
—
-—
—:r
.—
N.
6-;-
.
.
C)
‘c
.J
,-Q
J
.-.
CC
—V
-f-r
)—
S—C0cc-’
—
r)
--—
—-—
)-
.2,
—--
r-):•
v’
.—)
a.;—C
jC
l)
“(4
.C
I1
Ij
-H
L-—
—-
-
L
-J
CD CD CD
CD CD (ID CD
-Ii
C C
if)
CD CD CD CD CD CD C CD
0 CD c-I
CD C)
(ID C CD CD CD
CD CD C CD CD (ID CD CD CD c1 2 CD
2 CD CC)
(ID CD CD (ID C CD CD
> (ID
-J CD C CD -J CD C (ID CD CD -J CD CD (I) CD -J
H CD CD
CD c-I
CD -J CD (ID
(ID
CDI
CD c-I
CD CD CD (ID (ID
CD (ID (ID CD CD CD CD CD CD -J C)
-J CD CD CD CD
CD CD C (ID
(ID CD C (ID
(ID CD CD
CD -4 CD CD CD (ID (ID
(ID CD (ID
(ID CD CD — CD CD CD (ID CD hi
-4 CD -f CD —4
C H CD CD -4 (ID CD
-f CD 4-f C CD CD -4 -4
CD CD --4
-t
CD CD.
-J
(/D CD CD CD
c-I CD CD (ID
C.)
CD
4.-
f.4
)
(4’)
C.)
(.4)
(-4’
)
C:)
C C).)
C).)
C.3
(C)
ri-i
CD CD --4 CD 4-f CD -4 CD tt)
CD -4 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD
CD -i CD 4-f CD rt
--4 CD
(-)
4.-
f
CD CD C (ID CD Ic? CD CD CD CD
(I)
CD
(J(
CD CD 4)
C (ID
C If,
hi
(ID
-,
CD CD CD (4)
CD CD-
CD If)
CD —4
C (/D CD -t
--4
(4)
CD --4 CD (I) C -J 04
C (ID
C-
(/D
C C ./ -C CD CD (ID CD -4 C -4 CD
CD -4
4-
-t
CD CD CD CD-
CD x -I
CD CD -t 0 -4 0 4-f
)
CD CD (ID CD 4-f
)
CD -4 -4 CD CD CD
0 jc CD CD N CD 0 --4 0 4.-
f
C --4 CD
hi
CD CD cli
CD CD CD 9= -
94
*,
-9
CD CD CD (4) z CD CD CD C-’
--4 CD 0 CD (ID
(ID
-f CD (ID
C CD -4 CD Cl) CD CD 4* CL)
CD-
CD CD (C)
-f)
CD CD --4
4- -f)
CD CD CD CD CD ci- CD
H CD (ID —-4 Ic? CD C-
CD (ID
44)
CD CD-
CD (ID CD CD CD C CD C 4-.
)
CD CD 4-f CD
CD CD CD rt
CD -J CD CD -4 CD (/D
(ID CD CD
-CD CD
-CD >< c-
I
CD -4 CD CD
-
(‘C CD 4.-
(ID
(ID CD -J CD -f)
CD CD CD
C -4-4
-J Ic? 4-f
-4 CD CD
()
C CD-
CD CD CD -4 C CD C CD (ID CD CD CD CD C CD -f)
CD CD -tJ
C))
CD —S
CD CD ci-
CD --4
CL (-‘-4 CD (I) CD 4-)
-J CD CD -ci
Ct
(I) H C)) / CC)
(C)
0-
4-
C CD CD
-Ic?
--4
-4 ci-
CD (ID CD CD
-CD CD (ID CD CD 4
-f)
C CD CD IC CD
(I) ci C))
CD (ID CD -t CD CD CD 4-)
CD CD CD
4-
C CD-
C))
4-f CD CD CD CD CD CD
CD C)) C4-
CD CD (ID CD -t CD C))
-J CD
(1)
4- CD -4 CD D CD -t
CD H CD ci-
CD
-4.) D CD CD CD CD CD CD-
CD —4
4-f CD ci CD CD C CD
-CD C
-CD C
D
C4-
CD ci-
CD (/D
CD C))
(ID
C_
fCD C
_f
CD CD CD -J
C_
f
C 4-)
C (I)
CD CD CD CD CD (ID
-f CD -J
.$1)
O(l
.4, 4Y
(.1
4),
-f-
t_,.,
0-
Cp
La
(0 4-, —
4.
-C---
q 4--
I)4
D4 Di —
.4(.
))(
)
ç-
—
(ID CD (ID
(ID CD CD C_
f) 0 -4---
CD -J CD C_f
CD CD 9 hi
CD CD-
CD CD > (ID
H -4 CD CD C 4-
CD CD -J CD (ID (ID CD 4-
ci-
CD -J
C_
f
C .4-4 CD -4 (ID CD CD 4-
C CD
4-
4-f
-J CD (ID z C))
.4’
C))
CD CD H C_
f
CD j -1 -i )
-:.c
—((
—.—
——
—h
j
.“—
)(X
0
A)X
:
‘6
——
4-s
I)
4—i-
’,c_
:.4
_
40
--1
4
If,
CD CD
-J
Referee Report Rubric
Authors Name: / ( (
Title and Abstract
Paper Title:F Poor OK Good Super
J
11
5
Introduction
Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature Review
Content_of_lit_re_iew
Organization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style X..
Theoietical Analysis (may be in lit ie iew section) 1Discussion_of_underlying_theory
Empirical Analysis
The DataVariable Description and Summaiy Data Table /Description of procedure for data collection >
Data_limitations_and_problemsEmpirical Results
Discussion_of DGP/elTor_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)
Regression_results_tableRounding numbers aiid ease of reading display ><
Interpi_eting_Results
Explanation_of_a_particular_coefficientIf_Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities
Including_units_in_discussion_of_variables
L Appropriate functional foiins used and explained X -______
Discussion_of violations_of CEM
Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelation
Use_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticity_present)
1-lypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)
ConfIdence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)
Discussion_of economic_importance
Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) —
Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review) )Answering the research question
Conclusion
Summary of paperFuture_work
References:_Content_and_Style
O\_eiall_AspLLts_of the_PapetContent
\\‘ritingStyle_(figures,_tables,_look_and_feel)
7
Best Parts of the Paper:
LJ(l fNt fie
L-’f s
Things That Need Work:
Final Evaluation Reviewer’sNarne: Kf,.c AIc.kh
Referee Report Rubric
Author’s Name: Ak v Paoer Title: )].‘<o,’_ J4.....OK Good Suer
Title and AbstractTntroduction
Clear statement of research questionA
Literature Review
Content_of_lit_review
Organization of lit re\’iw
Citation usage and style 4 LTheoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section) j. : x
Discussion_of underlying_theoiyEmpirical Analysis
The DataVan able Oescription aiSummaiy Data Tab1Description of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empnical Results — —
Discussion of DGP!error term (e.g., CEM on Random Xs)
Regression results table
Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_display
Interpi etmg Results —
Explanation of a particular coefficient —
If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities -
Inn !r1?1c !ir!ltç ‘ n’ccr’i, (‘f
aidexplaliedDiscussion of violations of CEM -
Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation -
Use_of robust_S Es_(if Ii eteroskedasticity_present)
Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion_of_economic_importance
Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) -
Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review)Answering the research question
Conclusion
Summary of paperFuture work —
References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables. look and feel)
Best Parts of’ the Paper: Things That Need Work:
‘% h1/-4c.p+‘p:-
,3ffkL
/€i&rya 4
‘ %h:/.
_____________________
1/4 fl/c/&Final Evaluation: // Reviewer’s Name:
r////h ‘s-4l’J— V
Referee Report Rubric
:
Author s Name:Paper Title:
F Poor OK Good SLLperTitle and AbstractIntroduction
Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature_Review
Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section) fDiscussion of underlying theoryEmpirical AnalysisThe Data
Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems
Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table
r Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting ResultsExplanation of a particular coefficient
If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities1’1i HI
Appropriate functional fonns used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEMTesting for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationUse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importance
Computation_and_explanation_ot_elasticit__( if_applicable)Comparison of results to previous \\ ork ( from lit revie )Answering the research questionConclusion
Summary of paperFuture ork
References: Content and StyleO erall Aspects of the Paper
ContentWrtinuStylures.tabfcs._look_and_feel)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:
Final Evaluation:Reviewcr s Name: ‘
Referee Report Rubric
7 4- / •, , 7>
Authors Name: ‘ PaperTitle:/F Poor OK Good Super
Title and Abstract V L_____Introduction 1
Clear statement of research questionJ,, ji) LLiterature_Review
Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style
Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)
Discussion of underlying theoiy 1/’
Empirical AnalysisThe Data —
Variable Description and Summaiy Data Table
Description of procedure for data collection
Data_limitations_and_problems
Emoirical_ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM 01. Random Xs) jZ...7Reuression results table
Rounding numbers and ease of reading display I —
Interpreting ResultsExplanation of a particular coefficient
If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities;,, iCrflCCiflh1
Approp;ateftlnctiuna1foimsusedandexp1ai11ed
Discussion of violations of CEM
Testing for heteroskedasticity 01’ autocorrelation .
Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) JHypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)
Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) ‘
Discussion of economic importance
Computation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(if applicable)
Comparison_of_results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)
Answering the research question —
ConclusionSunimarv_of paperFuture work
References:_Content_and_Style
Overall_Aspects_of the_Paper
ContentWritingStyle (figures. tables. look and feel)
Best Parts of the Paper: Things That \eed Work:
4 k
Final Evaluation: Reviewer’s Name:
-
/
IntroductionIntro absent. Need to clearly explain what your topic is and what question you will try to answer.
Example, will use OLS regression to find out if there is a relationship between gas prices and real GDP. I
would make sure you state your dependent variable.
Lit ReviewThis section needs to be a review of similar studies that you can use to compare and contrast
with. Analyze what other people have done to answer the question (various models) and point out
where they are similar with each other and where they are different. Your lit review does not really
explain other studies. You explain possible variables that could affect gas prices, but you need to explain
what other studies have figured out and how they did that. Your last paragraph is not part of a lit
review.
Theoretical Analysis
You tend to do this throughout your lit review. Your last paragraph does resemble, to an extent,
a theoretical analysis, as you describe the variables you think are important to use. I would go further in
depth and explain why you chose those and not others.
DataYou list your variables you will use and describe how they are measured, which is good. You
need to explain where and how you got your data and then describe what potential limitations or
problems you might encounter (correlation, heteroskedasticity). Also don’t forget to use a table.
Empirical ResultsThis section was not present. Suggestion would be to use stata as it is easy to run regressions.
Make sure you report everything and properly use tables, graphs and other figures.
Interpreting Results
This section was not present as you don’t have any data or results yet. Once you do, make sure
you go through this checklist. Also find better lit review studies so you can compare your results with
others. You did include units in your variable list; make sure you interpret your results using units
(example, an increase in x amount of units of variable 1 will lead to an x amount increase in units of y).
Make sure you review CEM.
ConclusionWhen you get to this point make sure you summarize paper. Make your final conclusion
whether Gas $ and GDP are related. Then talk about what you could have done different and what
future studies should look at.
OverallYou have an interesting topic. I would make sure you chose your variables carefully and not drift
away from GDP too much. Remember your goal or question while writing this paper. I would also
recommend taking the final draft to the writing center as they will offer useful help. Make sure you use
proper figures as well.
.1-