lisa pathfinder and elisa: measuring differential ...• 1 million km michelson ifo with...
TRANSCRIPT
LISA Pathfinder and eLISA:
measuring differential acceleration for
gravitational wave astrophysics
William Joseph Weber
Università di Trento / INFN
for the LISA Pathfinder team
Iberian Gravitational Wave Meeting
Barcelona, 13 May 2015
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Massive black hole merger science with eLISA
Hubble Space Telescope image of UGC1810 – UGC1813 merger in ARP273
• 106 M◉ black holes at core of merging galaxies
• Max GW frequency at mHz detectable only from space
• need to measure relative acceleration at femto-g/Hz1/2 • Free-falling test masses • Measurement of their relative acceleration
Demonstrate with
LISA Pathfinder
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
• Low frequency performance acceleration noise limited
Not required for detection of MBH but key for science observation
most SNR (100 – 1000) built up in last week before merger (2-5 mHz)
ability to locate source requires weeks – months observation (< 2 mHz)
eLISA Massive Black Hole Science and low
frequency performance
ACCEL NOISE IFO NOISE
Z = 3
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
GW detection as “differential accelerometry” measurement • Tidal accelerations between 2 or more geodesic reference test masses • Need reference masses in free-fall(*) and measurement of their separation
2
ha L h
Effective “GW acceleration”
2
m e a s u r e na x
distance measurement noise
fo r c e
fa
m
Stray force noise (imperfect geodesic motion)
(*) Force free except for known, calibrated control / suspension forces
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
eLISA link as a differential accelerometer (2 TM in distant SC)
LPF as a differential accelerometer (2 TM in 1 SC)
LPF similar to 1 axis of a geodesy gravity gradiometer
g1
g2
IFO doppler signal
c
cLtgtgcLththerer
/
2
/
gc
2
106 km
40 cm
GOCE
Difference in stray force per unit mass
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
• 1 million km Michelson IFO with free-falling TM
• transponder replaces mirrors (100 pW usable light)
• time delay interferometry
time offset phase data, synthesize equal arm IFO
• interferometer TM – TM measurement in 3 parts:
TM-SC SC-SC SC-TM
12 pm/Hz1/2
• Drag-free TM SC follows TM along sensitive axes
3 fm/s2/Hz1/2
eLISA Measurement Concept
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
1 Million km SC-SC link • Telescope 20 cm diameter • Laser 1064 nm YAG 2 W output • 5-25 MHz doppler beat frequencies • Frequency noise with unequal arm IFO: L 10000 km
Phase measurements shifted in time (TDI) reduce L 10000 km < 5m
• 12 pm/Hz1/2
Local SC – TM measurement • Drag-free control of SC at 3 nm/Hz1/2
• Cross-talk / reference frame: Measure TM – moving in 6 DOF – 6 pm/Hz1/2
• TM force noise per unit mass: 3 fm/s2/Hz1/2
• LISA Pathfinder tests all of this! requires 2nd test mass as reference
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
da LISA a eLISA/NGO • Single link IFO noise
< 10 pm/√Hz @1 mHz
• Single TM stray acceleration
< 3 fm/(s2√Hz) @ 0.1 mHz
• 3 non-contacting (“drag-free”) satellites
• 3 arms 2 arms
• 5 Mo km 1 Mo km
• eLISA design parameter space: 2-3 arms, armlength
• Spectaculare science in reach even with smaller, cheaper NGO design
• 3rd arm gives 2nd and 3rd IFO combinations
instantaneous polarization, redundancy / debugging
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
The LISA Pathfinder differential accelerometer
1 spacecraft drag-free control
2 test masses 38 cm separation along x science axis 1TM drag-free reference 2nd TM electrostatically forced 38 cm
x
Each TM inside gravitational reference sensor (GRS) 6 DOF capacitive position sensor + actuator
GRS1
GRS2
LPF tests force noise and local IFO measurement for eLISA
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
The LISA Pathfinder differential accelerometer
1 spacecraft drag-free control
2 test masses 38 cm separation along x science axis 1TM drag-free reference 2nd TM electrostatically forced 38 cm
x
Each TM inside gravitational reference sensor (GRS) 6 DOF capacitive position sensor + actuator
GRS1
GRS2
Interferometer to measure relative TM acceleration
IFO optical bench
LPF tests force noise and local IFO measurement for eLISA
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Demonstrating eLISA differential accelerometer performance with LPF
• Why LPF can improve upon GOCE performance by more than a factor 1000 design, analysis, experiment
• How LPF will demonstrate this
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
From pico-g/Hz1/2 to sub-femto-g/Hz1/2: LPF design innovations
LEO mm/s2(Terrestrial)
residual atmosphere
L1 nm/s2 (spacecraft g) 0 for eLISA !!
deep space
GOCE LPF
• 2 TM, 40-50 cm baseline gradiometer in a drag-free spacecraft • pm/Hz1/2 displacment sensitivity
300 gm TM 100 mm gaps
discharge wire
2 kg TM 3-4 mm gaps no contacts
Actuation force noise «accelerometer range»
GRS surface force noise
tough caging UV discharge
need IFO
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
eLISA / LISA Pathfinder gravitational reference sensor (GRS)
VACT1
VACT2
VM
VAC
100 kHz L
L • 46 mm cubic Au / Pt test mass (2 kg)
• 6 DOF capacitive “gap” sensor w/ AC readout
• Audio freq electrostatic force actuation avoid DC voltages
• Large gaps (3 – 4 mm) limit electrostatic disturbances
• High thermal conductivity metal / sapphire
limit thermal gradients
• High vacuum (p = 2 mPa) limit Brownian, radiometric effects
• UV photoelectric discharge
• Caging mechanism for launch lock
• Defines TM environment
• nm/Hz1/2 measurement on all axes
• 10 pm/Hz1/2 interferometer used on x axis
• nN actuation forces (mN non-science)
• Flight heritage for eLISA
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF IFO displacement metrology < 9 pm/Hz1/2
• First high-precision interferometer coupled to free-falling TM in space • Demonstration of eLISA local position measurement • Zerodur optical bench with 4 heterodyne interferometers
o12 (x2 – x1) TM - TM +1, h1
o1 (x1 – xSC) TM - SC
+, h
+ frequency and phase stabilization IFO
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder as a differential accelerometer
Control
TM1 TM2
o12
o1 g1 g2
Drag-free: thrust SC to follow TM1 (null o1, 1 Hz BW)
Electrostatic suspension: force TM2 to follow TM1 (null o12, 1 mHz BW)
m
F
m
Fg
12
We want to measure differential force per unit mass:
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder as a differential accelerometer
TM1 TM2
o12
o1
ESSCp
SCp
FxxmFxm
xxmFxm
2
2
222
1
2
111
SCxxo
xxo
11
1212
Newton’s Eqns: IFO Readouts :
Commanded control forces
Elastic coupling
12
2
21
2
1
2
212ˆ oo
m
Fog
ppp
ES
IFO Acceleration
g1 g2
• Produce differential acceleration time series
• Spacecraft coupling term (stiffness) subtracted (also for LISA)
m
F
m
Fg
12
«gravitational observable» differential force per unit mass
g estimator:
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder as a differential accelerometer
TM1 TM2
o12
o1
ESSCp
SCp
FxxmFxm
xxmFxm
2
2
222
1
2
111
SCxxo
xxo
11
1212
Newton’s Eqns: IFO Readouts :
IFOggg ˆ
g1 g2
• differential acceleration time series
• Spacecraft coupling term (stiffness) subtracted (also for LISA)
12
2
21
2
1
2
212oo
m
Fog
ppp
ES
g
1
12
n
n
12
2
21
2
1
2
212nnn
ppp
IFO Noise
IFOg
m
F
m
Fg
12
«gravitational observable» differential force per unit mass
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder control, displacement and acceleration
TM1 TM2
o12
o1
«working in acceleration» • use dynamic parameters but not transfer function • remove long transients
Free particle «measure acceleration»
Accelerometer «measure control force»
12
2
21
2
1
2
212ˆ oo
m
Fog
ppp
ES
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
xxxm
Fxg
pSC
ES
2
21
2
IFOp
Cggoo
m
Fo
12
2
21
2
12
Calibrating the LPF differential accelerometer
• Modulate satellite drag-free and electrostatic setpoints
• Fit acceleration to commanded force (FC), measured positions o12, o1
+ other measured disturbances • Background force (g) and IFO noise
o1 o12
Actuator calibration
factor dynamical stiffness
Background force + IFO noise
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Surface
Bulk
3D sensing + actuation
Torsion pendulum small force
measurements (lightweight TM)
LISA Pathfinder flight test
LPF Instrument limit
IFO Actuation noise
LPF performance and TM acceleration noise sources for eLISA
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Torsion pendulum upper limit
eLISA Spec
LPF Spec
Tungsten fiber (Q = 3000)
Fused Silica fiber (Q = 800000)
GRS surface force noise: overall upper limits with torsion pendulum
• Attribute ALL unexplained torque noise to interaction between GRS – TM
• Convert to equivalent acceleration surface force noise upper limit
• LISA-like TM suspended inside prototype GRS with FEE
• Within factor 2 of LPF spec at 1 mHz • Many known forces measured to eLISA goal
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF instrument limit: noisy compensation of spacecraft self-gravity
2/1
/
2/12 2
VVaACTSgSVF
«accelerometer dynamic range» problem Noise in “DC” force applied to compensate local g Not present in eLISA!!
g1 g2
Design specs
Fx
N
• Expect < 8 fm/s2/Hz1/2 at 1 mHz • full analysis complicated by uncorrelated voltage fluctuations, act
Current measurements 2-3 worse
Current spacecraft mass balance calculations look better!
1/26-2/1
/
2
/Hz102
nm/s 65.0
VVS
g
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Opt bench + GRS ~ -50 nm/s2
(TM – TM) ~ -2 nm/s2
Spec 0.65 nm/s2
Model ~ 10 nm/s2 level
compensate by GRS internal balancing masses
(IBM) 1.8 kg W
Gravitational balancing to g < 1 nm/s2
• No full ground test: analysis (1/r2) + mass + position measurements
• In flight: measure 3 trans + 6 rot gravitational balances + measure gravitational stiffnesses
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder performance: with and without x-actuation
LPF best est
LPF spec
• Expect to beat LPF spec at all frequencies • If gravitational balancing at spec level, likely limited by actuation that
is not present in eLISA
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Pathfinder: avoiding actuation fluctuations with free-fall mode
compensate average DC force imbalance by applying a large impulse followed by free-fall (parabolic flight!)
x
• Example: Apply 100 x average needed force for 2.5 s, followed by 247.5 s free-fall • Analyze only free-fall data, avoid impulses
window to avoid gaps (windowed PSD) Iteratively extract noise to fill gaps (standard PSD) Low pass / decimate / detrend, set gap data to 0 (standard PSD)
• Can we recover intrinsic force noise at 10-3 -- 10-4 Hz in a series of 250 s experiments?
Grynagier, CQG 26 (2009) 094007
10 mm
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Testing free-fall mode on the ground • Can we recover intrinsic force noise at 10-3 -- 10-4 Hz in a series of 250 s experiments?
• Data with gaps (spectral leakage) • Huge increase in dynamic range non-linearity, timing issues
• What are the conditions in which free-fall / impulse mode can be used?
• Force levels, displacement range, time of flight
On-ground torsion pendulum test: • Rotated torsion pendulum forced to center • Flexibility to choose:
• DC force (pendulum rotation) • Elastic coupling (applied voltages) • Flight and impulse times
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF best est eLISA TM accel noise spec
LISA Pathfinder performance prediction
LISA Pathfinder should guarantee most of LISA science
(performance needed to observe calibration binaries with SNR=1 in 1 year)
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF GRS
Infinite gap model
Factor 13 in noise power
Noise source: Residual gas impacts Excess damping + Brownian noise in constrained volume
F
x
| |F
PRL, 103 140601 (2009) , Phys Lett A, 374 3365 (2010)
Single TM gas damping noise 4/1
0
2/1
1/222/1
30Pa 2Hz/fm/s 8.1
mpS
a
m • vent to space • could be largest stray force noise • no direct pressure measurement (but indirect through T effects)
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF: a physical model of limits to measuring differential acceleration In – orbit and on-ground
Example: electrostatics inside GRS
gap
11
x
C
CqEqF
x
TOT
xxx
• stray electrostatic fields (patch effects) • cosmic ray charging
Largest interaction: TM charge + average residual E field [PRL 108:181101 (2012)]
)(),(
1
SjTMi
ji
ij
x
xVV
x
C
x
C
q
V
x : equiv. single electrode potential
UV discharge of TM Charge noise requires compensation of average stray field Operation with non-zero q requires low fluctuations in stray field
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
• Torque noise with charged TM • Single electrode (500 mm2) < 12 mV/Hz1/2
• OK for eLISA (marginally)
Measure /compensate dF/dq (dN/dq)
• Measure / compensate 100 mV < 1 mV
• Need to measure dF/dq by varying charge (not with modulated VTM)
Uncompensated
Compensated
dN/dVTM (modulate VTM)
dN/dq (charge bursts)
Stray electrostatics (on ground):
mHz 1at V/Hz 801/22/1
m
x
S
Measure noise in dF/dq (dN/dq)
Tests of UV discharge, charge measurement
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Measure compensate dF/dq with UV TM charge bursts and modulated voltages
• Performance and debugging
• Several times and for two TM
Measure long-term TM charge fluctuations
• How well / how often do we need to balance field?
• Confirm charging models, low freq noise
• Correlation with radiation monitor
Full UV discharge testing
• Fast discharge and continuous
If necessary ...
• force noise with charged TM
• effect of single (bad) electrode
x = 27.4 +/- 0.5 mV (c2 =5.4 , 17 DOF)
LPF simulator
Stray electrostatics (In-flight):
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Measurement science investigations with LPF
• Measure spacecraft g (3 translations and 6 rotations) • Force noise from actuation
• invert test mass roles, apply common mode force, • free-fall mode
• Measure temperature fluctuations down to 10-4 Hz – and below – and dF/dT • Measure magnetic environment and forces from applied B fields • Measurement and compensation of average stray E field (nulling dF/dq) • Measure low frequency charge fluctuations with long term charge test • Stiffness / SC coupling / crosstalk measurements
Create physical model for limits to achieving perfect free-fall
Talks: Ferran Gibert, Miquel Nofrarias
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Technology Package: Payload Integration • Integration of the LCA payload
completed (end April 2015)
• Currently at IABG (Munich) for integration with satellite
• On schedule for launch in early October 2015
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LTP payload: IFO integration and testing • On-station thermal testing • integrated OBI with support structure • Fixed mirrors in place of TM • Success! 3 pm/Hz1/2 at 10 mHz
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LTP payload: GRS integration and testing
Test-mass
Electrode Housing UV discharge fibers
(3 per TM)
TM caging (top + bottom)
Vent valve Gravitational balance mass (not shown)
Release mechanism (top + bottom)
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LTP payload: TM / EH integration and testing
TM fixed (measured)
EH assembled around TM on hexapod
(aligned and measured)
• final cabling, electronics, part of vac chamber • EH moved around TM in 6 DOF • TM – EH position measured by CMM and by GRS electronics • Test of calibration, noise, alignment
alignment data used to align IFO
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LTP payload: TM – EH calibration and noise testing
Sensing noise measure 2-3 nm/Hz1/2
sensing noise floor
sensor calibration All critical alignments of GRS
within 10 micron / 1 mrad
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LTP payload: GRS vacuum and discharge test • UV discharge sensitive to surface
properties, cleanliness, bakeout
• Performed test of UV discharge after final bakeout with femto-amp electrometer measurement
• Next GRS venting will be in space!
• Observe UV emission from both TM and EH on both GRS (bipolar)
• Outgassing within GRS OK!
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LISA Technology Package: GRS - IFO Integration
GRS vent valve closed evacuated TM caged No joint GRS / IFO operations possible before flight caging not designed to align TM to IFO
However, during integration IFO laser / metrology turned on allowed IFO contrast (IFO works!)
better than design specs
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF Launch and Operations
• Launch with VEGA (5-6 th launch) into LEO from Kourou
• Propulsion module for orbit raising • One month cruise to L1
• Commissioning 2 months after launch
Decaging Gravitational balancing verification!
• 6 months science phase + possible extension
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
LPF Science Phase
Measure noise in g. And then explain it.
Dense schedule: noise runs interleaved with calibrations and tests on specific effects
Example timeline
• All procedures ready (and simulated) command sent by MOC (Mission Operations Center, ESOC, Darmstadt)
• Real time «scientific» data analysis (LTPDA) • On day N can change timeline for day N+3
STOC (Science Team Operations Center) ESOC/ESAC + remote
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
Timeline executed as part of 4 day SOVT «hardware in loop» simulation (February 2015) Test of ESOC ground segment mission operations Also test of STOC – analysis at ESOC and remote (50 people) [Real mission timeline won’t be so dense!]
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015
STOC and MOC at work during SOVT...
... and dreaming of launch on October 2!!!
Weber – 5th IGWM – Barcelona - 13 May 2015 44
Thank you … and the LPF Team: