linq 2013 session_red_3_sarsenbayeva
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
LINQ Conference: European and International Conference Learning
Innovations and Quality May 16- 17, 2013
Quality assurance of higher education:
National trends of development and
accreditation in Kazakhstan
Gulnara Sarsenbayeva (Kazakhstan)
Rome, 2013
Higher education in Kazakhstan:
Global dimension
Internationalisation/globalisation:
increased competition, growing global higher
education market, entering into global
educational market\space
Bologna process: Priorities: 3 cycle system,
Quality assurance, Recognition of qualifications
and periods of study
Higher education in Kazakhstan:
National dimension
National priorities: great variety of national
policies and corresponding requirements on
HEIs
National strategy: Kazakhstan with
ambitious economic and social goals – focus
on research and wider societal transformation
process
External factors impacting Higher Education
Rapid pace of technology innovation and deployment
IT and a knowledge-based society are the catalysts
Globalization
Changing demographics and diversity
Who will be tomorrow’s customers, inventors, and leaders? What will be modern Profile of engineers, teachers, lawyers, etc.
Non-technical forces will be key drivers of technological innovation
International standards and agreements
Quality assurance: an essential tool for Kazakhstan
HEIs on the way to knowledge society
Institutional level: Enhancing internal quality
Building Quality: New Evaluation Methodology
Institutional Evaluation system: national &
international
Quality Culture
Kazakhstani Forum for Quality Assurance:
conferences, symposiums, round tables
Enhancing internal quality: Mechanisms
for internal quality
Selection of priority areas for internal quality on the basis of
institutional self-evaluation
Linking university data collection and analysis with internal
quality processes
Ensuring effective feedback loops on outcomes of internal
quality processes (follow-up) and communication to the
university community
Avoiding overly bureaucratic or complicated processes
Critical analysis & discussions of QA issues
Enhancing internal quality: processes
Range of involvement:
Broad involvement of the university community (students, academic and administrative staff) in the development of internal quality measure (bottom-up)
University leadership to fully endorse and backup the implementation (top-down)
Cooperation
Information updates at internal, national and international debates & discussions
Exchange of experiences and good practices with other HEIs, nationally and internationally
Using opportunities for benchmarking
Active participation in national negotiations about the scope of quality measures
Lessons learned from QA activities
• There are no “one-fits-all” solutions, but it is possible to define common principles for internal quality
• There is no single definition of quality or excellence -> relative concepts
• Quality is not a neutral concept (can be measured, there are instruments to measure, criteria)
• Quality is closely related to ideology and power (who defines quality in which way, who is accountable to whom etc.)
• Direct correlation between autonomy and quality culture
(Autonomy linked with accountability)
QA: Cybernetics postulate
Everything that functions has to develop
Two types of management: operation management & development management
Concept of QA
Transformation of quality control system into system of development
New system of monitoring of quality in order to build recommendations for further enhancement
New system of management (autonomy, research university, modern strategic management, etc.)
New technologies of quality (Program committees, Industry Advisory Boards, System of Data Collection, etc)
New model of training: modern strategies of teaching, methods of teaching, introduction of integrated fields, etc.)
Quality assurance system: main components
Evaluation of programs (Students’ survey, employers survey, market survey)
Contemporary role of a teacher (enhancement of teaching, defining innovative cost and real value of knowledge)
System of self control, self evaluation
QA: accreditation
Evaluation of professional communities
Logics and effectiveness of educational process
Internal evaluation
Accreditation is not ranking, not rating!It is an effective tool for measuring quality!
Outcomes fit to demands of professional requirements & criteria
Recommendations
University- Industry cooperation: University chairs at industry, industry representative offices at universities
Curriculum development: discussions with professionals Quality assurance: system-based vs. process-based Effective management = QA (new methods of strategic
management, management of changes & reforms) QA - Operation management, Development Management Educational standards vs. quality standards Building Quality assurance, support and
development systems
Thank you for your attention!
Questions/Answers
Gulnara M. Sarsenbayeva (PhD, Ed)
Kazakh National Technical University after K.I.Satpaev
(Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)