linkscan *: overlapping community detection using the link-space transformation
DESCRIPTION
ICDE 2014. LinkSCAN *: Overlapping Community Detection Using the Link-Space Transformation. Sungsu Lim † , Seungwoo Ryu ‡ , Sejeong Kwon § , Kyomin Jung ¶ , and Jae-Gil Lee † † Dept . of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST ‡ Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
LinkSCAN*: Overlapping Community Detection Using the Link-Space Trans-formation
Sungsu Lim †, Seungwoo Ryu ‡, Sejeong Kwon§,Kyomin Jung ¶, and Jae-Gil Lee †
† Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST ‡ Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology§ Graduate School of Cultural Technology, KAIST¶ Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, SNU
ICDE 2014
April 1,2014 2
ContentsMotivationLink-Space TransformationProposed Algorithm: LinkSCAN*Experiment EvaluationConclusions
April 1,2014 3
Community DetectionNetwork communities
Sets of nodes where the nodes in the same set are similar (more internal links) and the nodes in different sets are dissimilar (less external links)
Communities, clusters, modules, groups, etc.
Non-overlapping community detectionFinding a good partition of nodes
Clusters are NOT over-
lapped
April 1,2014 4
OverlappingCommunity Detection
A person (node) can belong to multiple communities, e.g., family, friends, col-leagues, etc.
Overlapping community detection allows that a node can be included in different groups
fam-ily,
friends,
col-leagues,
April 1,2014 5
Existing Methods Node-based: A node overlaps if more than one be-
longing coefficient values are larger than some threshold Label Propagation (COPRA) [Gregory 2010, Subelj and Ba-
jec 2011] Structure-based: A node overlaps if it partici-
pates in multiple base structures with different memberships Clique Percolation (CPM) [Palla et al. 2005, Derenyi et al.
2005] Link Partition [Evans and Lambiotte 2009 , Ahn et al.
2010]
f(i,c1)=0.35, f(i,c2)=0.05, f(i,c3)=0.4, …
f(i,c)=mean(f(j,c))j nbr(i)
ii i
Base struc-ture:
cliques of size
Base struc-ture: links
=4=0.3
April 1,2014 6
Limitations of Existing Methods
The existing methods do not perform well for1. networks with many highly overlapping
nodes,2. networks with various base structures, and3. networks with many weak-ties
ii
f(i,c1)=0.2, f(i,c2)=0.15, f(i,c3)=0.25, f(i,c4)=0.2, …
c1
c4
c2c3
=0.3 𝑘≥3i
Weak-tie
i: overlappingCOPRA fails
i: non-overlappingCPM fails
i: non-overlap-pingLink partition fails
April 1,2014 7
ContentsMotivationLink-Space TransformationProposed Algorithm: LinkSCAN*Experiment EvaluationConclusions
April 1,2014 8
Our SolutionWe propose a new framework called the
link-space transformation that transforms a given graph into the link-space graph
We develop an algorithm that performs a non-overlapping clustering on the link-space graph, which enables us to discover overlapping clustering
OriginalGraph
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Non-overlap-ping Clustering
Membership Translation
April 1,2014 9
Overall ProcedureWe propose an overlapping clustering al-
gorithm using the link-space transforma-tion
OriginalGraph
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Non-overlap-ping Clustering
Membership Translation
April 1,2014 10
Link-Space Transformation Topological structure
Each link of an original graph maps to a node of the link-space graph
Two nodes of the links-space graph are adjacent if the cor-responding two links of the original graph are incident
Weights Weights of links of the link-space graph are calculated from
the similarity of corresponding links of the original graph
65 7
k
8
4
i
1 2 3
j
0i1 j1
i0 i2
ik
j2 j3
j4jk
k5 k8
k6 k7𝑤 (𝑣𝑖𝑘 ,𝑣 𝑗𝑘 )=𝜎 (𝑒𝑖𝑘 ,𝑒 𝑗𝑘 )
April 1,2014 11
Overall ProcedureOverlapping clustering algorithm using the
link-space transformation
OriginalGraph
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Membership Translation
Non-overlap-ping Clustering
April 1,2014 12
Clustering on Link-Space Graph
Applying a non-overlapping clustering al-gorithm to the link-space graph
We use structural clustering that can as-sign a node into hubs or outliers (neutral membership)
Original graph Non-overlapping clustering on the link-space graph
1
2
3
4
5
1/2
12
3413
23 35 45
003
1/2 1/2
1/211Another weights are less than 1/3
April 1,2014 13
Overall ProcedureOverlapping clustering algorithm using the
link-space transformation
OriginalGraph
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Membership Translation
Non-overlap-ping Clustering
April 1,2014 14
Membership TranslationMemberships of nodes of the link-space
graph map to the memberships of links of the original graph
Memberships of a node of the original graph are from the memberships of inci-dent links of the node
Membership translationNon-overlapping clustering on the link-space graph
1/2
12
3413
23 35 45
03
1/2 1/2
1/211
1
2
3
4
5
0
April 1,2014 15
Advantages of Link-Space Graph
Inheriting the advantages of the link-space graph, finding disjoint communities enables us to find overlapping communities where its original struc-ture is preserved since similarity properly reflect the structure of the original graph.
Easier to find overlapping communities
Preserving the orig-inal structure
Easier to find overlapping com-munities while preserving the original structure
Link-space graph
+¿
April 1,2014 16
ContentsMotivationLink-Space TransformationProposed Algorithm: LinkSCAN*Experiment EvaluationConclusions
April 1,2014 17
LinkSCAN*We propose an efficient overlapping clus-
tering algorithm using the link-space transformation
OriginalGraph
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Structural Clus-tering
Membership Translation
For a massive graph, it may be
dense
April 1,2014 18
LinkSCAN*We propose an efficient overlapping clus-
tering algorithm using the link-space transformation
OriginalGraph
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Structural Clus-tering
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
Membership Translation
Sam-pling
process
April 1,2014 19
LinkSCAN*We propose an efficient overlapping clus-
tering algorithm using the link-space transformation
OriginalGraph
LinkCommuni-
tiesLink-Space
Graph
Link-Space Transformation
Structural Clus-tering
Overlap-ping
Communi-ties
Membership Translation
Sampled Graph
LinkSampling
April 1,2014 20
Link SamplingSampling Strategy: For each node , we sample
incident links of , where and is the degree of Thm 1 guarantees that sampling errors are not
significant even when is smallFor real nets, a sampled graph and the link-
space graph are close (NMI>0.9) , while sam-pling rate is small (~0.1)
Thm 1 (Error bound)Applying Chernoff bound, the estimation error of
selecting core nodes decreases exponentially as the ’s increase.
April 1,2014 21
ContentsMotivationLink-Space TransformationProposed Algorithm: LinkSCAN*Experiment EvaluationConclusions
April 1,2014 22
Network DatasetsSynthetic network: LFR benchmark net-
works[Lancichinetti and Fortunato 2009]
Real network: Social and information net-works [snap.stanford.edu/data/ and www.nd.edu/~net-works/resources.htm]# nodes # links Aver. de-
greeClust. Co-
eff.DBLP 1,068,037 3,800,963 7.50 0.19Amazon 334,863 925,872 5.53 0.21Enron-email
36,692 183,831 10.02 0.08
Brightkite 58,228 214,078 7.35 0.11Facebook 63,392 816,886 25.77 0.15WWW 325,729 1,090,108 6.69 0.09
April 1,2014 23
Performance Evalua-tion
When ground-truth is known NMI for overlapping clustering [ancichietti et al. 2009] F-score (performance of identifying overlapping nodes)
When ground-truth is unknown Quality (Mov): Modularity for overlapping clustering [Lazar
et al. 2010] Coverage (CC): Clustering coverage [Ahn et al. 2010]
April 1,2014 24
Problem 1For networks with many highly overlapping
nodes, LinkSCAN* outperforms the existing methods.
April 1,2014 25
Problem 2For networks with various base-structures,
our method performs well compared to the existing methods
April 1,2014 26
Problem 3For networks with many weak ties, the ex-
isting methods fail for the following toy networks. But, LinkSCAN* detects all the clusters well
April 1,2014 27
Real NetworksFor real network datasets, the normalized
measure of (Quality + Coverage) indicates that LinkSCAN* is better than the existing methods.
April 1,2014 28
Link SamplingThe comparisons between the use of the
link-space graph (LinkSCAN) and the use of sampled graphs (LinkSCAN*) show that LinkSCAN* improves efficiency with small errors
Enron-email network# nodes = 37K# links = 184K
April 1,2014 29
ScalabilityThe running time of LinkSCAN∗ for a set of
LFR benchmark networks shows that LinkSCAN∗ has near-linear scalability
LFR benchmark networks# nodes = 1K to 1M# links = 10K to 10M
April 1,2014 30
ContentsMotivationLink-Space TransformationProposed Algorithm: LinkSCAN*Experiment EvaluationConclusions
April 1,2014 31
ConclusionsWe propose a notion of the link-space
transformation and develop a new over-lapping clustering algorithms LinkSCAN* that satisfy membership neutrality
LinkSCAN* outperforms existing algo-rithms for the networks with many highly overlapping nodes and those with various base-structures
April 1,2014 32
AcknowledgementCoauthors
Funding AgenciesThis research was supported by National Re-
search Foundation of Korea
April 1,2014 33
Thank You!