linking agriculture, health and education in an innovative ... · linking agriculture, health and...
TRANSCRIPT
Linking Agriculture, Health and Education in an Innovative Approach to Food and Nutrition Security in St. Kitts-Nevis and the CARICOM
I Granderson, K Gray-Donald, and L.E. Phillip1
End-of-project Knowledge-Sharing Workshops – June 10 and 16, 2014
La Guerite Conference Centre, Department of Agriculture, St. Kitts and Nevis
Outline
• Background – why are we here? • Project activities – what did we do? • Project results – what are our key findings? • Recommendations and actions for consideration • Interactive Discussion • Conclusions
Why are we here?
• To present key outcomes and findings for “stakeholder discussion” and policy considerations;
• To present the project’s evidence-based multidisciplinary, multi-sectoral, partnership building approach to problem solving to address food and nutrition security
– Driven by local and regional actors, addressing national and regional
challenge of overweight and obesity, a major risk factor in NCDs -a major economic burden for CARICOM
– The farm to fork model links farmers to consumers (children) in school
feeding programmes to encourage healthy eating and market and community development
We set specific goals (worked within “Jagdeo Initiative” and the Caribbean Commission on Health & Development)
• Improve nutrition & health outcomes of CARICOM populations through
increased availability and intake of vegetables & fruits, decrease caloric intake, and increase micronutrient intake;
• Develop food production systems based on agricultural diversification, water
conservation & efficient use of land; • Understand constraints to, and accelerate the rate of technology adoption by
small farmers; • Adapt international standards of food safety and quality for a healthy, market-
oriented food supply chain; • Expand and build human and institutional capacity to solve problems of food
and nutrition insecurity in CARICOM; • Build and test a Farm to Fork Model for CARICOM food and nutrition security;
Consumer Household Food Security
57%
43% Food secure
Food Insecure
N=297 48%
52% Food secure
Food Insecure
N=188
Trinidad
St Kitts
11 % are very food insecure
Food security %
Underweight for height
%
Overweight or obese
%
Insecure 46 5 28
Secure 54 4 38
Children from food insecure households are not more likely to be too thin
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
<-2 -2 to -1 -1 to 0 0 to 1 1 to 2 >2
Perc
ent
Height and BMI for Age
Height for AgeBMI for Age
8
WHO Z Score
Health and Nutrition Status of Children
Baseline Surveys: Farm-To-Fork Model
School feeding
Before Rice and beans, turkey wings,
Noodles/ground meat Hot dogs Chicken soup with pumpkin
and dumplings Cheese sandwich Sugar drink
Added String beans, carrots Tomatoes, cucumbers Sweet potato, pumpkin Melon, green banana
11
2013 2014
Product Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Tomato 26 19%
surplus 83%
surplus 0 0 17 57 43 53 36 82 78 80
Pumpkin 19 0 23 45 62 88 25 72 97 22 67 88 94
Cucumber 63 33%
surplus 25 0 30 73 14%
surplus 0 38 67 33 0 0 String Beans 43 33 41 8 33 20 15 0 53 70 17 18 43
Carrots 8 25 5%
surplus 33 14%
surplus 92 0 0 0 86 77 82 8%
Surplus
Sweet Potato 73 0 33 0 19 35 19 58 59 0 22 28 10
White Potato 0 29 31 60 14 0 0 16 0 0 43 87 1%
Surplus
Cabbage 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 23 93 0 86 97 92
Watermelon 0 0 21 14 79 26 25 0 9 0 8 0 13
Cantaloupe 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0
Banana 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 25 0 4 7 1
Other fruits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 53 25 8 3 0
Onion 28 42%
Surplus 85
Mutton 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Extent of produce supplied by Local Farmers in St. Kitts relative to School Meal Centre Needs – January 2013 to March 2014 school year
Extent of supplied (%)
0-25 26-50 51-70 76-100 Surplus
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Jan-Jun 2013 Sept-Dec 2013 Jan-Mar 2014
7 17
6
37 55
96
28 30 26
51 34
100
% o
f Pro
duce
supp
lied
Proportion (%) of produce supplied to St. Kitts School Meals Centre (SMC) by farmers in relation to SMC needs- January 2013 until
March 2014 school year
Fruits Vegetables Pulses Roots
Food procurement for school feeding
Calculated school offerings per child
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Protein Carbohydrates Fiber Total sugars Total sugars withjuice
Fat
Gra
ms
Average Macronutrient Distribution
Control
Intervention 1
Intervention 2
Control April 2013 October 2013
Portions of F &V. 0.13 0.51 1.07
Meal acceptance of new foods %
N/A 46-85 ---
Meal cost: food alone EC
0.96 1.57 2.06
Meals examined during April and October 2013
Containing costs to Scale-up
• Linear programming by Hazel Patterson-Andrews • Competitive buying to ensure best price • Eliminate most costly meals
Intervention 24 hour dietary recall
“End of project” intake of fruit and vegetables by children (8 to 12 year old) in St Kitts, based on number of children eating the school lunch meals on recall day
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fruit and vegetable intake
Serv
ings
frui
ts a
nd v
eget
able
s
Control
Improved menu
Final diet for one day in control and menu change groups
CONTROL MENU
Energy 1755 1659
Protein g 61.9 63.2
Fat g 28.11 27.34
Fiber 9.60 10.21
Calcium mg 476 484
Iron mg 11.98 12.91
Change in overweight status over the project.
• Overweight and obesity increased from 20.1
to 26.6 in under 2 years • No differences between treatment groups
Recommendations • Ensure that children receive a healthy lunch each day with at
least 1 full serving of fruit or vegetables every day. • Portion control • At least one meatless meal per week • The use of locally produced food is a priority and a link of
farmers to school kitchen is needed: Food procurement officer.
• Controlling sugar intake need attention as children are gaining excess weight as they grow
• Food safety at the SMC and at schools needs to be monitored • Food service and nutrition expertise needed for adapting
menus
Dialogue on School Wellness
• Beverages currently include 96+ lbs sugar • Snacks sold daily in schools / fundraising
– Healthy snacks? – Timing?
• Physical activity in school? • Nutrition education?
– Teacher training