life cycle of a grant - mcgill university · funding . locate funding • prioritize the research...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of Presentation • Introduction • Life Cycle step-by-step
• Pre-Award - OSR: • Olga Naiberguer, Grants and Foundations
• Awards Management- OSR • Marlene Boutet, Awards Management
• Financial Administration - RFMS • Elvie Coletta, Research Financial
Management Services • Q & A
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Proposal Development
Conceptualize Idea
Articulate hypothesis and aims
Locate Funding
Plan Research Proposal
Draft application for
funding
Proposal Development
Articulate hypothesis and aims • What are the expected activities to be
undertaken? • What are the expected outcomes? • What is needed to achieve objectives? • How much will it cost? • What expertise is necessary? Will other
researchers or partnering organizations need to be recruited to the project team?
Conceptualize Idea • What is the long-term goal (5-10 year plan)? • What are the short-term objectives (2-3 year plan)?
Conceptualize Idea
Articulate hypothesis and aims
Locate Funding
Locate Funding • Prioritize the research components and the
funding required to carry out the activities • Think strategically! Seek funding for specific
components of the research from different sources to better align with sponsor objectives
• Be creative in searching for funding opportunities
Locate funding opportunities • Visit OSR’s
Website • OSR’s Funding
Opportunities listserv
• Community of Science – Funding Opportunities Database
• Grants.gov • OSR Deadlines
List
OSR Funding Opportunities listserv
OSR Website
Click here
Community of Science & Grants.gov
OSR Deadlines List
Plan and Draft Research Application
OSR Grants Officer can provide additional
expertise on the agency requirements,
strategies for success, as well as the internal
deadlines. Important to contact OSR as early as possible in the process.
Contact OSR
Grants Officer
Review objectives and requirements
of the opportunity
Draft proposal and other
application requirements
Gather application
requirements
Proposal submitted to
OSR for review
CVs, biosketches for research team members, letters of support, institutional signatures for team members, etc.
Refine hypothesis and aims to better respond to the objectives of the funding opportunity and mandate of the agency.
Make a list of what is needed for the application.
START EARLY!
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Internal Review and Approval OSR Grants and Foundations Team: • Responsible for the pre-award processes for McGill research
grant applications • Provides expert advice in the development & preparation of
grant applications • Develops guides for applying and organizes sessions to assist
faculty in preparing grant applications • Reviews & approves applications on behalf of McGill • Communicates funding opportunities & results of
competitions • Most often the first point of contact for PIs seeking support
with research funding
OSR Internal Review • Grants Officer reviews
the proposal and provides advice related to: • Eligibility based on sponsor
regulations • Clarity of language and
presentation • Alignment with objectives
of the funding opportunity • Application requirements
and completeness • Budget requested and
justification
• Resources that help Grants Officer in their review • Funding opportunity
guidelines • Copy of any reviewer
comments from previous application to agency
• Confirmation of any in-kind and/or cash support being provided by Faculty/department or partnering organizations
• OSR Checklist
InfoEd record created for the application at this time
OSR Checklist • Shared tool that captures the
roles and responsibilities of PI, Department, Faculty, and OSR
• Faculty/Department/School • Used to assess and confirm
support of the proposed project, incl. budget, and availability of resources
• OSR • Assists in the review of the
proposal (e.g., applicant eligibility, additional financial contributions, salary requested, research compliance required)
• Used for data collection and reporting
www.mcgill.ca/research/sites/mcgill.ca.research/files/checklist_osr.pdf
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Institutional Endorsement and Submission • Only the authorized
delegates at the Office of Sponsored Research can sign research applications/contracts on behalf of McGill University
• Copies of application and duly signed OSR checklist must be submitted to OSR prior to submission even if no signature of authorized official required
• Grants Officer submits applications via e-submission systems, as required
Pre-award – Fundamentals
Usually 5 to 10 working days before agency deadline.
Internal deadlines
Required for all funding requests, contracts and agreements.
OSR Checklist
All applications, proposals, contracts and agreements in McGill’s name must be reviewed and signed off by the Office of Sponsored Research.
Signatures
Contact OSR Grants and Foundations Team as early as possible
Required in all cases, even if no signature required from authorized official
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Agency Peer-Review Process
Agency
• Conducts eligibility screening
• Sends applications to peer-reviewers
• Peer-reviewers make recommendation on merits of the proposal
• Sponsor makes funding decision
• Results communicated
OSR – Grants and Foundations
• Proposal is fully logged in InfoEd (status “Logged-Submitted”)
• Liaises with agency as required
• NSERC/SSHRC: results are communicated to OSR who then informs PIs
Peer-review processes • Mechanisms and processes vary, but principles remain
consistent • Resources to learn more about agency’s peer-review system:
• OSR Grantsmanship sessions • Manuals for peer-review committee members • Program guidelines • Previous committee members
• Videos explaining principles of Peer-Review: • NSERC • NIH Peer-Review Process
Results Announced The researcher is informed that their application was selected for funding!
The file moves from the Grants and Foundations team to the Award Management team in OSR
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Awards Acceptance and Management OSR Awards Management Team • Manages award acceptances/reviews and negotiates
grant agreements
• Delineates award parameters and Terms & Conditions for grants & contracts
• Approves new Fund creation and adjustments
• Assists with award management, i.e. sponsor notifications, issuance of subawards
• Liaises between Sponsor, RFMS, PIs & you
OSR Award Management Team
Awards Management
Team
Interprets and monitors governing Ts
& Cs
Processes subawards issued to
McGill
Issues subawards to
other institutions
Liaises with stakeholders
(PI, RFMS, Local
Sponsor)
Conducts ongoing eligibility
screening for grant holders
Approves all changes to
award parameters
Awards Acceptance Process
Type of award
Terms and Conditions
Other Conditions
Award Approval Process
Fund Creation
Types of Awards: Grant
Funding decision usually made via peer-review system
Scope of work developed & defined by researchers. Direction of research lies with PI
Deliverables usually limited to scientific & financial reporting
Detailed budget usually required consistent with Sponsor’s requirements.
Eligibility of indirects & rate often per Sponsor policy
Unrestricted rights to publish and IP rests with PI/institution
Contract
Funding not usually decided via a peer-review process
Scope of work agreed upon by PI and Sponsor or dictated by Sponsor.
Usually includes defined deliverables/milestones
Often fixed-fee payments tied to deliverables but can be claim-based per costs incurred. If budget included, usually flexible. Applicable indirects often per Institutional policy
Sponsor usually has right to pre-review publications. Terms of IP, confidentiality and indemnification are negotiated
Types of Grant Mechanisms • Notice of Award: brief letter from sponsor confirming award
details
• Letter of Acceptance: McGill acknowledges acceptance of terms of funding. McGill is usually the only signatory.
• Grant Agreement/Contribution Agreement: both parties agree to the terms and conditions of the funding and both parties are signatories. Usually requires reporting over the life of the grant.
• Sub-agreement: authorizes a portion of the scope of work to be conducted by another party. “Flows down” terms and conditions to sub recipient (e.g., subaward, subgrant)
Terms and Conditions
• Regulations that govern the administration of the research funding
• Awards Management Team delineates key Ts & Cs at the time of award approval • Follows up with sponsor as required to clarify Ts & Cs
• Ts & Cs included in InfoEd and sent to PI at the time of award approval
Ts&Cs – What are we looking for? • Project & budget period for use of funds • Total & annual amounts awarded; indirect costs • Specific eligible & ineligible expenses • Rebudgeting authority (flexibility of budget line items) • Carry-forward authority • Extensions (e.g., automatic, by request) • Reporting requirements: due dates, format, submission • Payment mechanism • Mandatory matching/in-kind commitments • Required collaboration/subaward agreements • Related co-funding awards
Other Conditions • Awards Management team requires a copy of applicable
ethics and compliance approvals • University Animal Care Committee (UACC) • McGill or affiliated hospital Research Ethics Board • Environmental Health and Safety
• Other conditions required by the sponsor prior to confirming award • Receipt of matching contribution(s) • Confirmation of appointment • Executed collaboration agreement/MOU
Multi-Year Awards: 3 Types of Award Approvals • Approved: Each instalment year pre-approved by OSR. Authorization given to
RFMS to update Banner at beginning of each budget year. No further action expected from OSR. Applies mostly to Tri-Agency grants whereas payments are automatic.
• Conditional: Each instalment year pre-approved by OSR. Authorization given to RFMS to update Banner at beginning of each budget year. No further action expected from OSR. However, payments from Sponsor are conditional upon the PI satisfying agency requirements (e.g., technical reports). McGill is advancing spending power. Should payments not be received in timely manner, Awards/RFMS may freeze the award. Applies to Provincial awards and all grant & contribution agreements
• NOD received: OSR approval needed for each instalment year before RFMS can adjust budget in Banner. Applies to subaward agreements (we are subrecipients) and awards for
which Sponsor releases annual NOAs (NSERC CRDs, NIH)
“Why hasn’t the Award/Fund been approved yet?”
Most Common Delays for Awards Approvals • OSR/RFMS is not aware that the grant was awarded • New Fund Request sent to Finance or Notice of Award sent to RFMS rather
than to OSR • Limited information provided to OSR: email with few details, detective work
required • Grant application bypassed OSR: need copy of application, completed OSR
checklist, and any supporting documentation PI may have received from sponsor
• Negotiation of grant agreement: clarification or unacceptable Ts&Cs • Compliance certificates missing
• PI should begin process ASAP upon notification of results • Other conditions required by sponsor: receipt of matching contribution,
confirmation of appointment, multi-party agreements with partners • RFMS is missing information from OSR to complete fund opening
Award Approval Fundamentals
NOA/Agreement & all pertinent award
documents received
Terms and Conditions outlined
Applicable compliance certificates confirmed
Award parameters (dates & amount
awarded) entered in InfoEd
Award approved in InfoEd
InfoEd record “OSR Approved” and action
item sent to RFMS/ Fund Management Team
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Fund Creation Process - RFMS
OSR sends action item through InfoEd to RFMS to open new fund
Fund Management Team (FMT) in RFMS creates a new Fund profile in Banner, confirms Fund number to PI
Financial Administrator (FA) is responsible for administration of file going-forward
Fund Creation 1. Fund Management Team (FMT)
• Receives approved award from OSR via InfoEd action item • A new Banner profile is created based on award parameters
entered in InfoEd • Restricted Fund numbers begin with a “2”
• Budget and receivables are setup according to the approved granting period • In cases where the Award Status is Conditional or NOD
Received, the budget is set up on a year-by-year basis • Memo of New Fund Opening is emailed to the PI and copied to
the Chair, Faculty Financial Contact, FA, and FST (if any) • Liaises with OSR if any clarifications are required
2. Financial Administrator (FA) • Reviews Ts & Cs and familiarizes with requirements of award • Handles file moving forward
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Award Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
OSR •Clarifications on grant terms and conditions •Updates/changes to award parameters
Human Resources (Payroll) • Salary and
benefits paid to employees for services rendered
Student Funding • Undergrad &
Graduate Student Support
Procurement Services • Purchase
Requisitions & Purchase Orders
• PCard
Accounts Payable • Payment requests • Invoice payments • Wire transfer
payments
Travel Desk
• Travel Advances • Expense Reports
RFMS •Award Administration •Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Administrator
PI
Award Administration - RFMS
Transaction Approval
Inter-Institutional Advances
Transfer of Expenses
Budget Instalments and
Adjustments
Other FOAPAL-related Changes
No Cost Extensions
Receivables and Reporting
Monitoring and Compliance
Audit/Monitoring Visits
Transaction Approval Process
Principal Investigator needs to pay someone or for something
Administrator processes/transmits payment as per PI’s instructions/request through the appropriate system (E.g. Minerva Appointment, PYAPOPS, BSA, MMP, MOPRA, Expense Report, etc.)
Financial Administrator at RFMS ensures expense compliance by verifying eligibility of expense, fund availability, and that the expense is charged within the granting period.
The appropriate unit receives the approval, finalizes transactions and completes payment. (E.g. Human Resources, Student Accounts, Procurement Services, Accounts Payable, Travel Desk, etc.)
Inter-Institutional Advances
PI emails request for inter-institutional
transfer.
FA assesses institution eligibility and fund availability.
Once FMT receives the signed transfer letter of
agreement from sub-awardee, FMT releases
cheque and confirms to PI that transfer is complete.
OSR negotiates sub-award agreement
with partner institution and McGill
PI.
FMT emails FA for approval to process inter-institutional
transfer. FA encumbers funds (if
applicable).
FMT processes upon FA approval and includes sub-
award agreement when mailing payment . FMT
confirms to PI that transfer is complete.
Funds involving foreign currency are handled by FA.
FA verifies Terms & Conditions in InfoEd and ensures agreement is
signed by appropriate signing authorities.
FMT processes payment and includes sub-award agreement when mailing payment. FMT confirms to PI that
transfer is complete.
Tri-Agency and Provincial Transfer Agreements
All Other Agencies or Ineligible Tri-Agency Institutions
Multi-year Sub-award Agreements
“I need to make some adjustments… now what?”
Transfer of Expenses
Salary Transfers
Non-Salary Transfers
Budget Instalments & Adjustments
Budget Instalments
Budget Increase/Decrease
Budget Reallocations
Other FOAPAL-related Changes
ORG Changes
Changes in PI Status
Transfer of Expenses – When? • An expense is temporarily
charged to a fund, while PI waits for the new fund to be opened.
• An expense is charged to the wrong fund number.
• An ineligible expense is incurred on the fund.
• The fund is over-expended. • The fund is terminated and there
is an outstanding balance to be cleared.
Transfer of Expenses Transaction How Do I Process?
Salaries & benefits incurred at McGill University
Department initiates transfer via FOAPAL change on Minerva
Retro salaries & benefits incurred at McGill University
Department initiates transfer via: • FOAPAL change on Minerva; or • Retro FOAPAL Journal Request paper
form
Any expenses (including salaries and benefits) paid to a third-party via invoice
A journal is processed to transfer the invoiced amount from one fund to another fund
Student awards incurred on Banner Student Aid (BSA)
Department initiates transfer via Reassignment Request on Minerva
Non-salary expense (e.g. materials & supplies, equipment, travel, etc.)
A journal is processed to transfer the expense from one fund to another fund
Budget Adjustments • Types of Budget Instalments (Budget Renewals):
• Automatic • Conditional (spending budget advanced to PI but
payments to McGill conditional upon submission of required reports)
• NOD received (requires OSR approval) • Budget Increase/Decrease:
• Notification from sponsor is required • OSR approval required for increases
• Budget Reallocations: • Sponsor approval required for some agencies (per Ts &
Cs)
Other FOAPAL-related Changes Type of Fund Adjustment
How Do I Process?
ORG Change • Department submits request to FFO for approval.
• FFO submits request to RFMS.
Change in PI Status • Any change in PI status (e.g. sabbatical leaves, maternity leaves, temporary leave of absence greater than 3 months, resignation) must be communicated to OSR as soon as possible.
• Email [email protected]. • OSR notifies RFMS of any updates.
No-Cost Extension • The grant period is extended with no additional funding to
allow for the depletion of the balance, respecting the new end date. • Automatic = No OSR involvment • Not Automatic = OSR involment
• The OSR Awards team will assess if sponsor’s approval is required. If so, they will work with PI to obtain it.
• Most Tri-Agency and Provincial grants (FRQ-NT/SC) include an
automatic one-year no-cost extension. No OSR involvement.
For most grants, if an extension is not granted, any residual balance will need to be returned to the sponsor.
Automatic Extensions Agency Automatic No-Cost (all other grants must be requested in
advance of end date) Duration of extension
NSERC All grants except Partnership Programs One year
SSHRC All grants except Connection Grants One year
CIHR All grants funded by CIHR (note some programs run through CIHR but funded by another organization may not have automatic extensions)
As specified in Authorization for Funding (NOA)
FRQ-SC All grants *note that only 25% of the final year of the grant can be carried into extension year without prior approval of agency
One year
FRQ-NT All grants One year
FRQ-S All grants (excludes salary awards) One year
Notes: • Granting programs run through an agency, but where funding provided by other organizations
(e.g., joint initiatives) may not have an automatic no-cost extension. • Extensions beyond the automatic one-year are only approved in exceptional circumstances (e.g.,
illness, family leave , etc.) • Extensions to any other agency/grant must go through OSR/RFMS.
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Fund Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Financial Reporting
Auto-Generated Financial Reports
• Applies to: Tri-Agency, CRC, FRQ-NT/SC
• High volume • Straight-forward • Mass electronic
upload
Sole Source Financial Reports
• Manual • Statement of
expenditures on sponsor funding only
Multi-Component Financial Reports
• Manual • Consolidated
financial reports • Justifications of
variances • Forecast
budgets • Matching
contributions
Financial Reporting • Reporting periods:
• Interim, annual, semi-annual, quarterly, every 18-months • Deadline to submit financial report
• Could be anywhere between 15 to 90 days within the fiscal year-end date, depending on agency requirements
• Federal Government agencies year end period is March 31 • RFMS peak period for annual financial reporting is between April
and June • E.g. CFI, Tri Agency, CRC, CSA, EC, FRQ-SC, FRQ-NT, FRQ-S
• Other agencies have different reporting periods; deadlines can fall anywhere within the year
• Some agencies require supporting documents to be submitted along with the financial report • E.g. AAFC, MDEIE
Financial Reporting Other Considerations: • Sub-awardees • X-Coded Funds • Matching Funds • In-Kind Contributions • For final financial report or claim:
• Outstanding encumbrances must be cleared • Address unspent balance • Over-expenditure must be cleared
Receivables – How We Get Paid
• Per payment schedule Automatic Payments
• Fixed amount Invoices
• Actual costs incurred Claims
• Statement of expenditures Financial Statements
Reminders • All financial reports and claims are prepared by
RFMS • Financial reporting embedded within progress
reports should first be vetted by RFMS • PI must review and sign the financial statement
• Authorized financial signing authority = RFMS • Authorized grantee signing authority = PI
Monitoring and
Compliance
Oversees over-expenditure monitoring
Follows-up with control
reports
Coordinates audits, follows-up
with and implements audit recommendations
Develops compliance
programs by transaction type (Pcard, Expense Reports, Payroll,
Feeds, etc.)
Communicates findings
Simulates Tri-Agency audits
Measures performance –
KPIs
Benchmarks – FST statistics
Monitoring & Compliance Reviews Monitoring & Compliance team oversees both RFMS Control Reports and Compliance Programs. Examples of Control Reports: • Over-Expenditures • Aging Reports • New Funds Control Report • Letter of Guarantees • Inter-Institutional Advances • Ineligible expenses – Tri Agency
Compliance Programs • Pcard • Expense report • Feeds • IDC • Journals • Invoices • Payment requests • Payroll • Fund reconciliation
Just to name a few….
Audit/Monitoring Visits
Sponsor • Can request an audit on the fund anytime during the life of the grant.
Auditor • Requests for a list of expenses incurred during the period being audited. • Picks a sample selection from the list to audit.
RFMS
• Liaises with the PI, the department and other central units to collect all supporting documents for the sample selection.
• Coordinates with and provides auditor with supporting documentation.
Supporting Documentation Transaction Type of Supporting Document
Expense Reports (IE) Invoices, Receipts Conference programs and prospectus, taxi chits, sponsor per diem rates, etc.
Feeds (F) Invoices, Receipts, PI’s Authorization, Service Level Agreements
Feeds for Payroll (F) Award Certifications, Minerva Appointments, Offer Letters, Signed Memos, Time Sheets
Interdepartmental Charges (IDC)
Invoices, Receipts, PI’s Authorization
Journals (J) Invoices, Receipts, PI’s Authorization
PCards (IC) Invoices, Receipts
Student Awards (F or I) Award Certifications, Invoices, Notice of Awards
Documentation and Retention Responsibilities: http://www.mcgill.ca/financialservices/sites/mcgill.ca.financialservices/files/retention_of_financial_documents_roles__responsibilities_nov_27_2012_1.pdf
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Fund Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Award Closure • Project is complete – PI has submitted final technical report;
all milestones and deliverables have been met • All funding is received from sponsor • All inter-institutional advances to partners are received and
accounted for • All payments to sub-awardee(s) and vendors have been
made • Outstanding commitments are cancelled • Outstanding travel advances are reconciled • All financial reporting and/or invoicing is complete • Balance is at $0
“What happens to unspent balances at award closeout?”
Scenario 1 Unspent balance on X-Coded
Fund (Child Fund)
Returned to Main Fund (Parent Fund)
X-Coded Fund is closed
Scenario 2
Unspent balance on Fund
Returned to sponsor
Budget is reduced on Fund
Fund is closed
Scenario 3
Unspent balance on Fund
Sponsor allows PI to use on other research
Unspent balance transferred to PI’s Residual Fund
Fund is closed
Competitive Renewal • Researcher has successfully completed his research project and
would like to secure funding to support the next phase of the long-term project.
• The grant cycle begins again. • If competitive renewal award has the same sponsor award/grant
number, usually Fund # remains the same.
• If sponsor has issued the competing renewal award with a new grant number, a new Fund is required.
• New InfoEd PT record created for competing renewal applications.
Proposal Development
Internal Review and Approvals
Institutional Endorsement and
Submission
Agency Peer-Review Process
Award Acceptance and Management Fund Creation
Fund Administration
Financial Reporting and Monitoring
Award Closure
Who do I contact? Grants and Foundations •Proposal Development •Application process •Reviews of applications prior to submission •Information on funding opportunities •Liaison with agencies regarding calls for proposals •Institutional signatures
Awards OSR •Awards Acceptance •Institutional signature on grant agreements and sub-awards issued to McGill •Changes to parameters & terms of the Award •Liaison with the agencies regarding award management • Issues subs to other institutions
Research Financial Management Services •Fund account information •Statements of Account •Eligible expenses •Issuing sub-award agreements to Canadian institutions (Tri-Agencies, FRQ)
Grants and Foundations Name Portfolio Email Phone
Naiberguer, Olga Associate Director, Grants and Foundations [email protected] 398-3488
Callaghan, Jennifer Project Assistant - Provincial Programs [email protected] 398-3256
Chatman, Meredith Prizes and Awards Administrator [email protected] 398-3218
Clark, Lauren Project Assistant [email protected] 398-4880
Couture, Marie-Eve Senior Grants Officer - Provincial Programs [email protected] 398-3348
Donato, Maureen Grants Officer - Biomedical (CIHR, NIH), Cancer-related Sponsors [email protected] 398-5184
Kemp, Linda Grants Officer - Provincial Programs [email protected] 398-3592
Liness, Martyn Grants Officer - International [email protected] 398-8915
Mastalerek, Joanna Grants Officer - Foundations, Social Sciences & Humanities Sponsors (SSHRC) [email protected] 398-7300
Milbradt, Vera Administrative Officer [email protected] 398-3790
Narasimhadevara, Rupa Senior Grants Officer - Team Grants [email protected] 398-7105
Nguyen, David Grants Officer - Canadian natural sciences and engineering agencies (NSERC, etc) [email protected] 398-8707
If you’re not sure who to contact, contact [email protected].
Awards Management Name Portfolio Email Phone
Boutet, Marlene Associate Director, Awards Management [email protected] 398-8120
Capizzi, Maria
Awards Administrator – Canadian natural sciences and engineering agencies (NSERC, etc) [email protected] 398-5114
De Angelis, Teresa Awards Administrator – Provincial Agencies [email protected] 398-3283
Greco, Rosa Maria Awards Administrator – Contract and Agreements [email protected] 398-1887
Lam Tsang On, Florise Awards Administrator – International [email protected] 398-7229
Larin, Amy Senior Awards Officer [email protected] 398-4803
Larivière, France
Awards Administrator – Biomedical, Social Sciences and Humanities (e.g., CIHR, SSHRC) [email protected] 398-5211
If you’re not sure who to contact, contact [email protected].
Research Financial Management Services
Name Portfolio Email Phone
Coletta, Elvie Director [email protected] (514) 398-5188
Lea Archambault Senior Manager – Monitoring and Compliance
[email protected] (514) 398-2659
Sonia Pietraroia Compliance Supervisor – Monitoring and Compliance
[email protected] (514) 398-5678
Cindy Furtado Supervisor – Tri-Agency, CRC, NIH, US Army, Heart & Stroke and Other Foundations, Associations
[email protected] (514) 398-2314
Marilena Mincu Supervisor – CFI, MDEIE, Genome, Contracts, FRQ-NT/SC, FRQ-S and Other Foundations, Associations
[email protected] (514) 398-2313
Linda Augello Supervisor – Fund Management Team [email protected] (514) 398-3884
Brenda Lam Training and Support Officer [email protected] (514) 398-2100
Fund Management Team [email protected]
If you’re not sure who to contact, contact [email protected].