leveraging performance standards to reduce risk - houston smrp mars 2013
DESCRIPTION
Mike Poland will present a methodology to create a risk-based asset management strategy for safety-critical equipment of offshore oil rigs. He will cite case study examples from LCE client Atwood Oceanics, Inc. This methodology is also appropriate for other industries that require managing the asset integrity of safety and environmental management systems.TRANSCRIPT
1MaRS 2013
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk
Michael E. Poland, CMRP, CCMPLife Cycle Engineering, Inc.
Key items
• Asset Management Overview• Risk‐Based Asset Management Methodology• Creating the Infrastructure for Continuous Improvement
• Risk and Failure Analysis• Performance Standards• Condition‐Based Maintenance
Asset Management
Concept Design ProcureCommissionQualificationValidation
OperateConstruct MaintainDe –
commission
Asset Support Asset Operation Asset Utilization & Performance
Asset Improvement
Physical Asset Portfolio
Business Objectives
Strategic Plan
Maturity
IBM
•Learning to See
Process Flow DiagramValue Stream MappingRelationship Models
Equipment CriticalityFailure Analysis
Risk AnalysisRisk Ranking
Standard WorkOperating Procedures
PreventivePredictive
Condition MonitoringRemote Monitoring
Operator CareCritical Spares
OEETCO
Asset UtilizationMTBFMTTR
OPERATIONAL STABILITY
MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
© 2013 Life Cycle Engineering
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Value Creation
Taxonomy
7
Taxonomy per ISO 14224:2006
(1)BusinessCategory
(2)Installation/
Business Unit
(3)Cost Center/ Op Unit
(4)Function
(5)System
(6)Sub system/Asset
(7)Component/Maintainable Item
(8)Part/ BOM
Use
/ Loc
atio
n D
ata
Equ
ipm
ent S
ubdi
visi
on
Guidelines from ISO 14224
Criticality Analysis
Determine Functions
Functional Failures
Failure Modes
Consequences
Causes
Determine Action
Proactive DefaultIEC 60812
Failure Analysis
Current StateIn general, the following apply to the current maintenance procedures: • Most of the procedures are generic. • Data is rarely recorded. • There is no evidence that any data is trended. • There are a number of very general requirements, such as “check coupling alignment”, with no acceptance criteria defined, nor are there instructions to accomplish. • OEM manuals are not referenced. • Material types and quantities are not specified. (e.g. “grease bearings”). • Warnings/cautions/safety requirements and notes are not used. • There doesn’t seem to be written correlation between finding discrepancies and corrective actions.
Future State
Leveraging RigMax (Maximo)
DISPATCHING/ EXECUTING
Performance Standard
Safety Case Identify Safety Critical Systems
Develop Performance Standards
Identify Trendable Data and Thresholds
Create Maintenance Tasks
Outcome
Path Forward
17MaRS 2013
Speaker’s Contact Information
Michael E. Poland, CMRP, CCMPLife Cycle Engineering, Inc.2500 CityWest BlvdOffice: 713.267.2387Mobile: [email protected]