levels of service and their impact on capex phil caffyn, utility consultants ltd please read...
TRANSCRIPT
Levels of service and their impact on CapEx
Phil Caffyn,Utility Consultants Ltd
www.utilityconsultants.co.nzwww.capex.cjb.net
Please read disclaimer on second page
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
2
Disclaimer• This presentation has been prepared primarily
for the Infrastructure CapEx Summit 2008 and is not to be relied upon by event participants or any other person as professional advice.
• This presentation has been compiled by Utility Consultants Ltd at the invitation of Conferenz. Neither Conferenz, its officers or its employees take any responsibility for the factual accuracy of this presentation or for any views, opinions or biases in the content of this presentation.
• Utility Consultants Ltd as the author of this presentation shall not be liable in any way whatsoever for any action or failure to act based on the content of this presentation.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
3
Presentation topics
• Part 1 – What are LOS.– The asset management model
– Importance of price
– Defining LOS
– Classes of LOS
• Part 2 – Importance of getting LOS right.– Investing in LOS
– Getting the LOS wrong
• Part 3 – Linking LOS to CapEx– LOS variations
– Lifecycle activity variations
– Spend variations
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
5
The asset management model• The asset management activities within an organisation look a bit like
this…
Customerinterface
Levels OfService
Cash
Operations
Maintenance
CapEx
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
6
The asset management model
• Four components to this model…– Customer interface.
– Transfer of LOS across that interface.
– Transfer of cash across that interface in the opposite
direction.
– Whole range of activities sit against that interface
and stretch back into the organisation.
• In some instances the person receiving the
LOS may be different from the person paying
the cash eg. electricity retailer versus
connected customer, or subsidy for rail.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
7
Importance of price
• Price is a key component in the LOS mix – any
discussion of LOS without reference to price is
meaningless, because we all want more !!!– Books and DVD’s in the library.
– More swings and slides at the park.
– Trains that run more often.
– Streets that don’t flood after heavy rain.
• Unfortunately the cost structure of an
infrastructure business can make it hard to
nail down any direct and obvious linkage
between LOS and short-term price.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
8
Importance of price
• And of course, there is the whole matter of
price determining what funds are available for
actually doing the work !!!
• In many infrastructure sectors, price will also
be constrained by “non-market” factors…– Public policy decrees.
– Regulatory determinations.
– Pricing methodologies that are subject to regulatory
approval.
– Priorities of elected members.
– Subsidies from other users or from tax payers.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
9
Defining LOS
• LOS are what we (or someone else) pay for
every time we use a service, but in this
context, LOS are also the destinations of the
AM journey.
• Without a well-defined destination, it’s hard to
make the journey.
• As Alice in Wonderland concluded “if you
don’t know where you want to go, any road
will take you there”.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
10
Defining LOS
• So the starting point of robust CapEx, and
indeed the whole AM process, is a set of well-
defined LOS.
• We can broadly define infrastructure LOS in
terms of three characteristics…– Capacity (“how much”)
– Availability (“how often”) – sometimes this can be an
operational decision.
– Quality (“how good”)
• These definitions are a bit arbitrary, and can
be broadly juggled to fit with terms like
reliability and security of supply.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
11
Defining LOS
• Just a couple of examples to help set the
mode of thinking…
Customer interface
Capacity(how much)
Availability(how often)
Quality(how good)
Airport runway Is it big enough to land all the planes used these days
How often is the runway closed by fog
How bumpy is the surface
Wash bowl in a public toilet
How many bowls are there – do I need to wait
When are the toilets closed to the public
Is it clean
Electricity fuse at my front gate
Is it big enough to supply my max demand
How often does the supply to my fuse go off
Is the voltage stable and free from flicker
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
12
Defining LOS
• My personal view is that LOS are (or need to
be) the next frontier of AM and CapEx.
• Many AMP’s have assumed that LOS are going
to stay the same, so the LOS thing is quite
disconnected from the rest of the AMP.
• However after many years of little or no
upsizing, capacity headroom across many
classes of infrastructure has been eroded to
the point where we need to give serious
thought to capacity as a LOS.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
13
Classes of LOS
• LOS fall into two broad classes…– LOS that benefit those who pay for them (eg.
capacity, availability, quality).
– LOS that benefit others (eg. safety, information
disclosure, absence of interference, amenity value).
• In the AMP’s that I’ve prepared I’ve found it
helpful to consider the LOS in the following
classes…– Customer LOS.
– Regulatory LOS (because most infrastructure is
subject to some form of economic or structural
regulation).
– Community LOS.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
14
Classes of LOS
• Customer LOS can be further broken into sub-
classes based on what customers say is most
important…– Primary
– Secondary
– Tertiary
• Customer surveys in the electricity lines
industry reveal that customers primary LOS is
keeping the lights on, and getting them back
on if they go off.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
15
Classes of LOS
• LOS like quick processing of new connection
applications, or providing technical advice are
rated as relatively unimportant when
compared to real-time delivery of LOS across
the customer interface.
• Unfortunately for infrastructure operators, the
most important LOS are those requiring fixed
assets rather than processes.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
17
Investing in LOS
• The CapEx process turns cash into physical
assets which deliver outcomes (the LOS).
• Referring back to the asset management
model, we note that CapEx is very remote
from the customer interface.
• We all appreciate that the moment-by-moment
decisions (operations) made at the customer
interface can significantly impact on LOS.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
18
Investing in LOS
• We also all appreciate that the CapEx
decisions made in the boardroom and the
backroom will significantly impact on LOS.
• It’s also very clear that the linkages between
CapEx decisions (especially capacity) and
LOS are not simple.
• Hence the CapEx activity has an implicit risk
of mis-matching the capacity and the LOS
(and that’s just when the LOS sits still !!)
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
19
Getting the LOS wrong
• This mis-match of capacity to LOS can occur
in two ways…– Under investment in capacity.
– Over investment in capacity.
• Each of these modes of investment has
significantly different types of risk which (in
my view) are only just beginning to be
understood.
• Under investment usually results in a service
failure in which LOS are not met – the loss of
economic value easily exceeds the cost of
service, and can mean injury or death.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
20
Getting the LOS wrong
• Over investment usually results in capacity
being built ahead of time (and if demand
growth is low, it may never be used).
• The risks of over investment therefore tend
to be more commercial (and often regulatory)
in contrast to the risks of under investment
which tend to be operational, safety or
reputation.
• My view is that it is better to err on the side
of over investment than under investment as
getting it totally right will prove very hard.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
22
Introductory remarks
• Having concluded that the linkage between
CapEx and LOS is complicated, and that
precisely matching CapEx to future LOS is not
easy, this section sets out some thoughts
which will hopefully make it a bit easier.
• A key component of linking LOS to CapEx is
understanding the risks along the way,
because afterall CapEx is a risk-based
discipline.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
23
LOS variations
• Understanding that the three classes of LOS
(customer, regulatory and community) are
likely to vary over time is very obvious.
• Understanding how those classes of LOS might
vary is a bit more challenging…– How will residential electricity customers demand for
supply quality change as they all buy heat pumps
and plasma TV’s ??
– How will the properties of an airport runway need to
be altered when more airlines start flying A380’s ??
– Will the roads in rural areas withstand increased
numbers of logging trucks as forests are
harvested ??
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
24
Lifecycle activity variations
• Understanding what variations in lifecycle
activities might be required to accommodate
variations in LOS is where it starts to get
tricky.
• Varying operational decisions to meet LOS
variations is pretty straightforward…– Coupling a few extra carriages on to a train or tram
when a big footy game or concert is on.
– Working a fleet of mining trucks two shifts instead of
one to increase production tonnage.
– Winding up a tap changer when the voltage drops.
– Starting a pump when a sump fills up.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
25
Lifecycle activity variations
• These are very straightforward decisions that
don’t put the organisation to any capital cost,
and can be easily undone if the decision
proves wrong.
• Most importantly, the linkage between the
LOS variation and the variation to the lifecycle
activity is obvious.
• When variations to LOS require variations to
capacity, availability and quality that are
beyond simple operational activities, things
start to get a bit tricky.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
26
Lifecycle activity variations
• Consider the previous example of working a
fleet of mining trucks two shifts instead of
one to increase production tonnage.
• That option will probably work fine for a short
period – sure there will be maintenance and
personnel issues to be addressed.
• If, however, the increased production is likely
to be a long-term thing, there will be other
options such as buying a fleet of bigger
trucks, or replacing trucks with conveyors.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
27
Lifecycle activity variations
• Each of those options (two shifting, bigger
trucks, conveyors) stretches back into the
asset management model away from the
customer interface, into that area that is less
obviously connected to the LOS.
• The choices involve long-term capital
decisions that the organisation will be stuck
with for a long time.
• The right choice will depend on the
organisations policies, strategies and
markets (and in many cases the regulatory
regime).
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
28
Spend variations
• Once we think we know the variations to
lifecycle activities that are required to meet
varying LOS, the final step is to identify the
spend variations.
• This used to be as simple as estimating
present day costs and multiplying by an
agreed inflation index.
• Alas – no more !!!
• Costs of key inputs – steel, cement, copper,
glass, diesel and labor - all seem to be
rushing ahead of the official inflation rate.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
29
Getting the linkages right• Conclude this section with a brief model...
LOSvariations
Lifecycle activity
variations
Spend variations
Key risks- Failure to understand how LOS are created by
the organisations’ activities and processes.- Failure to accurately model likely future
demands for capacity, availability and quality.
Key risks- Failure to understand how LOS variations will
require variations to existing lifecycle activities.- Failure to understand the options available for
meeting required future LOS (simple linear scaling may not be the best option).
- Failure to understand the organisations criteria for assessing options.
- Failure to use the correct decision tools for assessing the options.
- Failure to understand how a regulatory regime may treat costs and discriminate between options (especially between OpEx and CapEx).
Key risks- Failure to correctly estimate future costs.- Failure to inform internal stakeholders of cost
increases.
Very straightforward – no excuse for getting this wrong
Can be hard, but some well thought out scenarios should provide accurate
estimates
Getting people on side can be hard, but still no excuse for getting this wrong
Can be hard, but again some well thought out scenarios should provide
some reasonable forecasts
None of these are dead easy, but neither are they very hard. Some clear thought around each of these issues will minimise the risks of each step,
which in turns minimises the cumulative risk
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
31
Practical things to take away
• Understand what LOS your organisation
provides, and how they might fit within a
generic framework of capacity, availability
and quality.
• Understand exactly what the customer
interface is, both physically and
commercially.
• Understand that some LOS do not directly
benefit your paying customers .
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
32
Practical things to take away
• Understand the role of price, how it funds the
business model, and what factors might
constrain prices or distort price signals.
• Understand the nature and risks of over- and
under-investing in capacity.
• Clearly understand the risks involved in
linking CapEx to LOS, and how clear thinking
and appropriate use of analytical tools can
minimise those risks.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
34
• Phone (07) 854-6541
• Mobile (021) 606-670
• Email [email protected]
• Skype philcaffyn
• Web www.utilityconsultants.co.nz
• Web www.capex.cjb.net
• Subscribe to “Pipes & Wires” (email
me).
Contact me for more info.
www.utilityconsultants.co.nz www.capex.cjb.net
35
Contact me for more info.• Request the following slide shows on similar topics…
• Implementing the UK asset management specification PAS 55-1:2004 in the infrastructure sector. Request
• Setting service levels for utility networks. Request
• Tariff control of pipes & wires utilities – where is it heading. Request
• Renewals – (half) the hidden side of CapEx. Request
• Upsizing –the other half of the hidden side of CapEx. Request
• Getting the CapEx right in the infrastructure sectors. Request