letter: transmittal of technical memorandum no. 1 …

9601001.DOC/MI0028815-01

ABB EPA Region 5 Records

256077

January 2, 1996

Mr. Rob MacLeodEnvironmental Response DivisionMichigan Department of Environmental QualityKnapp Center300 S. Washington SquareLansing, MI 48909

Subject: Technical Memorandum No. I prepared by C.C. Johnson & Malhotra, P.C. (CCJM)Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/Oversight Assistance (MERA #700010)Contract Order No. Y-40207

Dear Rob:

Enclosed please find two copies, for your review, of Technical Memorandum No. 1 "Phase II RemedialInvestigation Activities," prepared by CCJM for the Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/OversightAssistance site. Also enclosed is the CD which we forgot to include with the last tech memo.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me or Brett Coulter of CCJM.

Sincerely,

ABB ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

Garret E. Bondy, P.Site Manager

GEB/kat

Enclosure

ABB Environmental Services of Michigan, Inc.

39255 Country Club Drive B-25Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331-3490

Telephone (810) 489-8040Fax (810) 489-8048

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 5

' ERD-SUPERFUNDPROJECT: Waste Management - Holland Lagoons/Oversight Assistance

SUBJECT: Data Validation - Soil and Groundwater Samples

PREPARED BY: Maria Crouch, ABB Environmental Services, Inc.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to document the data validation activities

conducted by ABB Environmental Services, Inc. (ABB-ES) for soil and groundwater samples collected

at the Waste Management/Holland Lagoons site. The task was conducted under Contract No. ERD-9477

with the State of Michigan under the direction of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

(MDEQ) Superfund Section. Background information on the project can be found in the Work Plan.

PROCEDURES

The data packages generated by ENCOTEC, Inc. for the water and soil samples collected during the field

program were reviewed using USEPA CLP National Functional Guidelines. Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2

present the analytical results as reported by the laboratory for soil and groundwater, respectively. Tables

TM5-3 and TM5-4 present the validated results with the appropriate data qualifiers for soil and

groundwater, respectively. The laboratory qualifiers used on Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2 are defined in

Attachment I; data validation qualifiers used on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4 are defined in Attachment II.

For all analyses, sample results qualified with a "U" due to blank contamination were treated as positive

results when further qualification was needed (i.e., when validation action applied to positive results),

except in the case of field duplicate evaluation, which was done after blank evaluation, and where results

qualified with a "U" were considered non-detected. Organic compound results below the contract

required quantitation limit (CRQL) were flagged with a "J" by the laboratory on Tables TM5-1 and

TM5-2 . These results were considered estimated and flagged with a "J" on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4.

Metals and cyanide results between the instrument detection limit (IDL) and the contract required

95IOCO2 DOOM1002/II15-OI TM5- 1

detection limit (CRDL) were flagged with a "B" by the laboratory on Tables TM5-1 and TMS-2. These

results were considered estimated and, if other qualifiers were not added to these results by a validation

action, flagged with a T* on Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4. In cases where samples were reanalyzed due to

a quality control (QC) failure during the original analysis of the sample, the results of the analysis

requiring less rigorous qualification were reported on Tables TMS-3 and TM5-4.

The water samples were analyzed using the following methods:

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level VGA (USEPA 10/92)

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level SVGA (USEPA 10/92)

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level Pesticides/PCB's (USEPA 10/92)

Target Analyte List (TAL) Inorganics (USEPA ILM03.0)

Target Analyte List (TAL) Total Metals (USEPA ILM03.0)

Target Analyte List (TAL) Dissolved Metals (USEPA 1LM03.0)

The soil samples were analyzed using the following methods:

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level VGA (USEPA 3/90)

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level SVGA (USEPA 3/90)

Target Compound List (TCL) Low Level Pesticides/PCB's (USEPA 3/90)

Target Analyte List (TAL) Inorganics (USEPA ILM03.0)

RESULTS

This narrative pieseuts a summary of the laboratory QC deficiencies and the resulting qualification of the

TM5-2

Volatile Organic Compounds

Holding Times

Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from time of

sample collection to time of sample analysis. All samples were analyzed within the required holding

time.

Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) Instrument Performance Check

Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) is analyzed every 12 hours to verify the instrument's mass resolution,

identification, and sensitivity. All BFB ion abundance criteria were met.

GC/MS Initial and Continuing Calibration

Initial calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce

acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The initial calibration percent relative standard deviation

(% RSD) must be less than 30 percent, and the relative response factor (RRF) must be greater than 0.05.

The % RSD for acetone was greater than 30 percent in the initial calibration associated with aqueous

samples; therefore, positive results for that compound were qualified as estimated in associated samples.

Continuing calibration checks are performed every 12 hours to demonstrate that the instrument can

produce acceptable qualitative and quantitative results as established by the initial calibration. The

continuing calibration percent difference (%D) must be less than 25 percent, and the RRF must be

greater than 0.05. All continuing calibrations met QC criteria.

Blanks

Laboratory (method) and field (trip) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of

contamination resulting from field or laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the

concentration in the associated blank (10 times for methylene chloride, acetone, and 2-butanone).

Sample results below this action level are considered attributable to blank contamination; results greater

9S100:2.DOC/M1002/M15-OI TM5-3

than this level are considered to be acceptable. Due to trip or laboratory method blank contamination,

acetone results were qualified as non-detected in associated samples where the results were below the

calculated blank action level.

Syvteaa Mmutorug Contpouds (Surrogates) Recoveries

System monitoring compounds are added to all samples and blanks prior to analysis to assess recovery

(accuracy). Action is taken if any system monitoring compound recoveries are outside the acceptance

range, or if any one recovery is less than 10 percent. System monitoring compound recovery criteria

were met for all samples.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Dapticatr (MS/MSD)

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate analyses were performed at a frequency of 5 percent to assess

method precision and accuracy (although not required by SOW 10/92). The laboratory established

percent recovery (% R) and relative percent difference (RPD) criteria were met for the MS/MSD

performed on aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. Method '/• R and RPD criteria were met for the

MS/MSD performed on soil sample HL-VS-C3-B.

Laboratory Coatrol Saaapfe (LCS)

Laboratory Control Sample analysis is required by SOW 10/92. Laboratory Control Samples are

generated once per sample delivery group (SDG) to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical

method and on the laboratory performance. Percent recovery criteria were met for the LCS analyzed in

the SDG of aqueous samples.

lateral Standard Response

The internal standard response is monitored for each sample to verify GC/MS sensitivity and the stability

of the detector's response. The internal standard area must be >SO percent and <IOO percent (± 40

percent for SOW 10/92), and the retention time must be within ±30 seconds (±20 seconds for SOW

10/92) of the associated calibration standard. All internal standard QC criteria were met

MMttUMCMMMMMI TMS-4

Target Compound Identification

Chromatograms and mass spectra are reviewed to minimize the reporting of false positive and false

negatives. For each compound detected, the relative retention time must be within ±0.06 units and the

qualitative criteria for mass spectral identification must be met. No problems were observed.

Compound Quantitation

Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and CRQLs were accurate.

Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct. Extensive communication with the

laboratory was necessary to obtain correct results.

Tentatively Identified Compounds

All TIC spectra were reviewed to verify that the identifications were acceptable and that laboratory

contamination was taken into account. Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.

Semivolatile Organic Compounds

Holding Times


sample collection to time of extraction and analysis. Water samples must be extracted within 7 days of

sample collection, and soil samples must be extracted within 14 days. Sample analysis must be

performed within 40 days of sample extraction. Holding times were met for all samples.

GC/MS Instrument Performance Check

Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP) is analyzed every 12 hours to verify the instrument's mass

resolution, identification, and sensitivity. All DFTPP ion abundance criteria were met.

9510022.DOC/MI002/S815-OI TM5-5

GC/MS Initial ud Coatiarag Calibration


acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The initial calibration % RSD must be less than 30

percent, and the RRF must be greater than 0.05. No action was required due to initial calibration QC

failures.

Laboratory (method) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of contamination

resulting from laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the concentration in the

associated blank (10 times for phthalates). Sample results below this action level are considered

attributable to blank contamination; results greater than this level are considered to be acceptable. Due

to laboratory method blank contamination, di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-ethyfbexyl)phtha]ate results

were qualified as non-detected in associated samples where the results were below the calculated blank

action level.

System Moahoriag Coatpoaads (Surrogates) Recoveries

Surrogates are added to all samples and blanks prior to extraction to assess recovery (accuracy). Action

is taken if any two acid or base/neutral surrogates are outside the acceptance range (as stated in National

Functional Guidelines) or if % R is below 10 percent for any acid or base/neutral surrogate in a sample.

No action was necessary due to surrogate % R QC failure.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)


method precision and accuracy. MS/MSD analysis is not required by SOW 10/92, but is required by

SOW 3/90. The laboratory established % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed on

aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. No action was necessary due to % R or RPD QC deficiencies for the

MS/MSD performed on soil sample HL-SS-B6-I.

TM5-6

Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)


generated once per SDG to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical method and on the

laboratory performance. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol percent recovery was below the method QC limits for the

LCS analyzed in the SDG of aqueous samples; therefore, positive results were qualified as estimated and

non-detected results were rejected.

Internal Standard Response

The internal standard response is monitored for each sample to verify GC/MS sensitivity and the stability

of the detector's response. The internal standard area must be >50 percent and <100 percent (± 40

percent for SOW 10/92), and the retention time must be within ±30 seconds (±20 seconds for SOW

10/92) of the associated calibration standard. No action was necessary due to internal standard response

out of QC limits.



negatives. For each compound detected, the relative retention time must be within ±0.06 units and the

qualitative criteria for mass spectral identification must be met. No problems were observed.

Compound Quantitation


Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct. Extensive communication with the


Tentatively Identified Compounds (TLCs)


contamination was taken into account. Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.

95100Z2DOC/MI002/M15-01 TM5-7


sample collection to time of extraction and analysis. Water samples must be extracted within 7 days of

sample collection, and soil samples must be extracted within 14 days. Sample analysis must be

performed within 40 days of sample extraction. Holding times were met for all samples.

iBStnuacBt PerfonttBce Check

Performance checks are performed to verify target compound resolution and the instrument's sensitivity.

For compound resolution criteria to be met, the resolution between the adjacent peaks in the resolution

check mixture must be greater than 60 percent, and the mixture must be analyzed at the frequency

specified by Che method. The performance evaluation mixture (PEM) most also be analyzed at the

frequency specified by the method; the retention times must be within the windows established by the

initial calibration analyses; the %D between the calculated and true concentration must be less man or

equal to 25 percent; and the endrin and 4,4'-DDT breakdown (the amount of decomposition that those

compounds undergo when analyzed on the GC column) must be less than or equal to 20 percent (30

percent for endrin and 4,4'-DDT combined). Resolution check mixture analyses met acceptance criteria

for all samples. Performance evaluation mixture analyses were performed at the required frequency and

met acceptance criteria for all samples.

laffial aid Coatinmg CaJibntio*


acceptable qualitative and quantitative results. The individual standard mixtures must be analyzed at the

concentrations and frequency specified by the method. For the initial calibration linearity criteria to be

met, the % RSD must be less than or equal to 20 percent for all compounds, except for die two

surrogates, for which the % RSD must not exceed 30 percent Standards were run at the required

frequency and acceptance criteria were met for all samples.

TM5-8

Continuing calibration checks are performed to demonstrate that the instrument can produce acceptable

qualitative and quantitative results as established by the initial calibration. The %D between the

calculated and true concentration of the individual mixtures A and B must be less than or equal to 25

percent, and the retention times must fall within the windows established by the initial calibration.

Standards were run at the required frequency and acceptance criteria were met for all samples.

Blanks

Laboratory (method and instrument) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of

contamination resulting from laboratory activities. Action levels are calculated at 5 times the

concentration in the associated blank. Sample results below this action level are considered attributable

to blank contamination; results greater than this level are considered to be acceptable. No action was

necessary due to laboratory method or instrument blank contamination because all results were non-

detected.

Surrogate Recoveries

Surrogate compounds are added to all samples and blanks prior to extraction to assess recovery

(accuracy). Action is taken if both surrogates are outside the acceptance range in either column, or if any

one surrogate recovery is less than 10 percent. No action was necessary due to surrogate recoveries

outside of QC limits.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)


method precision and accuracy. MS/MSD analysis is not required by SOW 10/92, but is required by

SOW 3/90. Laboratory-established % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed on

aqueous sample HL-GW-MW-04. Method % R and RPD criteria were met for the MS/MSD performed

on soil sample HL-SS-B6-I.

93I0022.DOC/MI002/I8IS-OI TM5-9

Laboratory Coatrol Sanpfe (LCS)


generated once per SDG to provide information on the accuracy of the analytical method and on the

laboratory performance. The LCS analyzed with aqueous samples met all QC criteria.

Cleanp Checks

Cleanup procedures (gel permeation chromatography [GPC] and florisil) are used to remove

interferences from sample extracts. Cleanup checks verify acceptable recovery of pesticides through the

cleanup process. Recoveries must be between 80 - 120 percent (florisil) and 80 - 110 percent (GPC).

These criteria were met



negatives. For each compound detected, the retention time must be within the retention time window

determined during initial calibration for both the primary and confirmation columns and the %D between

the results obtained from each column must be less than 25 percent

CoHpond QwurthatMMi


Results initially reported by the laboratory were not all correct Extensive communication with the


Tentatively Identified Conpouds


contamination was taken into account Reported concentrations are estimated (J) values.

HMO TMS-10

Inorganics

Holding Times

Holding times are evaluated to address the validity of the results based on the elapsed time from sample

collection date to preparation. Maximum holding time for inorganics analyses are as follows:

metals (excluding mercury) - 6 months

mercury - 28 days

cyanide- 14 days

All samples were analyzed within the allowed holding times.

Calibration

Calibration demonstrates instrument linearity and ensures that the instrument can produce acceptable

qualitative and quantitative results. For the initial calibration linearity criteria to be met, the correlation

coefficient must be greater than 0.995 for mercury and cyanide analysis. Initial calibration verification

(ICV) and continuing calibration verification (CCV) %R must be between 90-110 percent (80 - 120

percent for mercury and 85 - 115 percent for cyanide). The CRDL standard for ICP must be prepared at

two times the CRDL and % R must be between 80-120 percent. The CRDL standard for ICP analysis

(CRI) was not prepared at the prescribed concentrations. Although National Functional Guidelines

indicate that the appropriate action in this case is to reject all data associated with the incorrectly mixed

CRIs, using professional judgment, the decision was made to qualify as estimated positive results of

analytes for which the laboratory had used a true value of less than two times the CRDL. Barium,

calcium, iron, magnesium, manganese, sodium, and potassium positive results were qualified as

estimated. All other calibration criteria were met.

Blanks

Laboratory (preparation/calibration) blanks are analyzed to determine the presence and magnitude of

contamination resulting from laboratory activities. No action was necessary due to blank contamination.

9510022 DOC/MI002/M15-01 TM5-11

lateriereace Check Sample (ICS)

The ICS verifies the instrument's inter-element and background collection factors for inductively

coupled plasma (ICP) analyses. The ICS % R must be within 80 - 120 percent All results were

reviewed and found to be acceptable.

Laboratory Control Sanpfe (LCS)

The LCS monitors the overall laboratory performance from sample preparation through analysis.

Aqueous LCS recoveries must fall between 80 - 120 percent, and solid LCS results must fall within the

limits established by USEPA for that LCS. All reviewed results were found to be acceptable.

Laboratory Dapficate Analysis

Duplicate results provide a measure of the laboratory's analytical precision. The RPD must be less than

SO percent (100 percent for soil) for sample results 5 times the CRDL, or ± the CRDL (±2 times the

CRDL for soil) for sample results less than 5 times the CRDL. Aluminum and calcium duplicate results

were not within acceptance limits for soil samples; therefore, positive results for these analytes in the

associated samples were qualified as estimated.

Matrix Spike

Matrix spike analyses are performed to assess method accuracy. Spike recoveries must fall within the

range of 75 - 125 percent All matrix spike % R were within QC limits.

ICP Serial DihrtkM

Serial dilution analyses evaluate the effects of physical or chemical interferences in the sample matrix.

Serial dilution results must agree within 1 5 %D of the original sample for results greater than SO times

IDL. Zinc did not meet QC criteria in the serial dilution performed for soil samples. Positive and non-

detected results for that analyte in associated soil samples were qualified as estimated

TM5-12

Sample Result Verification

Laboratory calculations were checked to verify that reported concentrations and IDLs were accurate.

The calculations which were reviewed were performed correctly, and the CRDLs were adjusted for

sample size, percent solid content for soil samples, and dilution factors.

95I0022.DOC/MI002/SSIS-01 TM5-13

Attachment I - Definition of Laboratory Qualifiers

(for Tables TM5-1 and TM5-2- Laboratory Report of Analysis)

J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but

greater than 0 or when estimating a concentration for TICs.

U - Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is

adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.

B - Indicates analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.

E - Indicates that the analyte concentration exceeded the calibration range of the GC/MS and that a

re-analysis of a diluted sample is required.

D - Indicates that sample concentration was obtained by dilution to bring result within calibration

range.

N - Indk***** presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is used for TICs were the

identification is based on a library search and is applied to all TIC results. For general classes of

compounds (hydrocarbons, etc.) this flag is not used.

P - This flag is used for pesticides/PCBs when there is greater than 25% difference between the

concentrations on the two columns used for analysis. The lower value is reported.

C - This flag applies to pesticide/PCBs results when the identification has been confirmed by

GC/MS.

A - Indinrty? that a TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product

TM5-14

X - Laboratory-defined qualifier used to provide additional information not covered by the other

qualifiers.

Inorganic Data Qualifiers

E - The reported concentration is estimated because of the presence of an interference.

M - Duplicate injection precision criteria were not met.

N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.

S - The reported concentration was determined by the method of standard additions.

W - Post-digestion spike for furnace atomic absorption analysis is outside control limits.

B - Concentration reported is below CRDL but greater than the IDL.

* - Duplicate analysis not within control limits.

+ - Correlation coefficient for the method of standard additions was less than 0.995

U - Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is


95IOOU.DOC/MI002/ISIS-01 TMS-15

Attachment II - Definition of Validation Qualifiers

(for Tables TM5-3 and TM5-4 - Validation/Summary Table)

J . Estimated concentration because QC criteria were not met

R - Results were rejected because of serious QC deficiencies.

U- Indicates that compound was analyzed but not detected. The sample quantitation limit is


N - Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is used for TICs were the

identification is based on a library search and is applied to all TIC results. For general classes of

compounds (hydrocarbons, etc.) this flag is not used.

UJ - Quantitation limit was rsrimatrd concentration because QC criteria were not met

JN - Presence of an anaryte was tentatively identified and the associated result represents an estimated

concentration.

TMS-16

TABLE TM5-1CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES

MDEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995

Sample Location:Sample Date:

HL-SS-B6-)7/11/95

HL-SS-BS-l(re)7/11/95

Re-Analysis

HL-VS-C3-B7/11/95

HL-VS-C3-B(re)7/11/95

Re-AnalysisVolatile Organic* Unto

ChtoromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChtoroethaneMethylene chlorideAcetoneCarbon disulffde1.1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dtchloroethane1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)Chloroform1.2-Dlchloroetham2-Butanone (MEK)1.1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorldeJromodlchloromethanet ,2-Dlchloroproparw;ls-1 ,3-DichloropropeneFrichloroetheneDlbromochloromethane,1.2-Trichloroethane

Benzenerans-1 ,3-Dlchloropropene3romoforml-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)-Hexanone'etrachloroethene,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane'oluene;hlorobenzeneIthyl benzene•tyreneylene (total)

Semlvolatlle Oroanlcthenoli«(2-Chloroethyl)Ether-Chlorophenol,3-Dlchlorobenzene,4-Dlchlorobenzene2-CNchlorobenzene•Methylphenol2'-oxybis(1 -Chtoropropane)•Methylphenol-Nitroso-DI-n-PropylamineexachloroethaneitrobenzeneophoroneNltrophenol4-Dimethylphenol»(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane4-CHchlorophenol2,4-TrichlorobenzeneiphthaleneChloroanillne

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

Unrttug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4 J

10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4 J


330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U


NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

TABLE TMS-1 (ConttMMd)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOI. BORMG SAMPLES

WASTE MMUGEMBTT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IJULY1M9

7/I1W5HL-SS-W-Krv)

7/11/WHL-VS-C3-B HL-VS-C3-B(r*)

7/11/95

330 U3SOU330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 U«• BJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UMBJ

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U

MAHANAHAMANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

NAMANANANANANANAMANANA

NANANANA

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 U330 U330 Uaoouaoou330 U330 U330 Uaoou330 U330 U330 UffSBJ

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U77 BJ

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

NA

NANA

NANA

.(LMM)

1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U13 U3JU

1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U1.0U1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U1.0 U2.0 U2.0 U

1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3JU13 U

1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U3.3 U

TABLE TM5-1 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES


Sample Location: HL-SS-B6-I

Sample Date: 7/11/95

Pesticides (Cont.)

EndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate

4.4'-DDT

Methoxychlor

Endrin ketoneEndrin aldehydealpha-Chlordane

gamma-ChlordaneToxaphene

Aroclor-1016

Aroclor-1221

Aroctor-1232

Arodor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254

*roclor-1260

Total Meta|s

Mumlnum\ntimony

\nm\c3arium

Jeryltium

Cadmium

Jaldum

Chromium

MaltJopperronMdMagnesiumtanganes*lercury

Ickel'otassiumelenlum

liverodium

hallium

anadium

Incyanlde

Units

ug/kgug/kgup/kg

ug/kg

ug/kgug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kgug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kgug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kg

ug/kgug/kg

Units

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kgmg/kg

mg/kB

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kgmg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/kg

mg/fcBmg/kg

3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U

3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U

170 U33 U67 U33 U33 U33 U33 U33 U

1,290 E*0.04 U0.2424.70.24 U0.022*0 E*3.81.2 []6.6*

1,900 E1.8*

398 E16.6 E*0.03 U*3.0182 []0.11 []0.02 U13.6 []0.04 U44

62.6 E0.05 U

HL-SS-B6-l(re)

7/11/95Re-Analysis

2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U2.0 U10 U

2.0 U2.0 U1.0 U1.0 U100 U20 U40 U20 U20 U20 U20 U20 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

HL-VS-C3-B

7/11/95

3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U

3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U170 U33U67 U33 U33 U33 U33 U33 U

2,700 E*

0.04 U0.409.3

0.24 U0.03

1,680 E*3.7

0.96 U4.3*

1,760 E2.0 •

673 E16.4 E*0.03 U*3.6197 []

0.13 []0.02 U17-4 []0.04 U3.7

64.2 E0.05 U

HL-VS-C3-B(re)

7/11/95

Re-Analysis

3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U3.3 U17 U

3.3 U3.3 U1.7 U1.7 U

170 U33 U67 U33U33 U33 U33 U33 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

Notes: U - Indicate* that compound wat analyzed for but not detected. The sample quantltatlon limit I* adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.

J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but greater than 0 or when estimating aconcentration for TIC*.

B - Indicates analyte was detected In both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.

[ ] - Concentration reported Is below CRDL but greater than the IDL

E - The reported concentration is estimated because of the presence of an Interference.

* • Duplicate analysis not within control limits.

NA-Not analyzed.

- Analytes detected are shown In bold text

MIUMJOWMMU/ail-OO

TABLE TM5-2CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNOWATER SAMPLES

MDEQ • WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE 0JULY 1995


dauiuiiieinaneTMnometnane

Vinyl ChlorideCntoflMOMM

AcetoneCarton duuNide1.1-OkhloroeJhene1.1-Oichloreathane1 -OfcNoroathene (total)Chtorofonn1.2-OkNoroethane2-6utanone (MtK),1.1-Tiicnlocoetnane

Carton TebachtoridewnodicMoronMinane

Tncraoroelnene

.ix-TiniamueuianeBenzenetnro-1>DicNoropropeneQromufuiiii44MhyU-penlanone (MIBK)•» • •t-i laiaiiuueretracNoroePiene1.1 3'TetrachlofDethanerohieneChtorobenzaneEViybenzaneStyrenetytane (total)

3ft* «uti'TOeWm

*(2X»lofoa!hyl)Bher!-CMofophenol,3-DicNofQbenzene

-Ofcnkwobenzane-Methytphenol! -aocybis(1-Chloroprooene)•Metnylphenoll-NRJroso-Oi-<>-Propytaminel j uiifcl__- B- JAV^h—kleHaKiiionMinanv«» — ••TOOBIUJBIPJ

-Nwupntnoi_4-DinMihvlntMnal

• M*JIug/L

._— •ugA.ua/Lugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.. ir>nugA.ugA.• MeJIug/LugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.• M*Jiug/LugA.ugA.

•ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.itftHugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.,,,-•1ugA.• M.JIug/Lua/L

HL-OW-MW-047/17/95

1 U1 i iU1 U1 1 1U2 U5 J

SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

sou1 1 1U1 U4 1 11 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 1 1U1 U1 U1 1 1U

sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3U

SU5U5U5U5 11

U

5U5USU5U5U5USU5 1 •U5 1 1U5 U

HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-O57/17/95 7/17/95

ReW Duplicate

NAt|ANANABkIANANAp*rNANANANANANANANAB.IANA

NAKlANANANANANAKlANA

NANAKlANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANA

NANANANANANANABkl ANAKlANANA

1 U1 1 I

U

1 U1 1 1U2 u

U

2 JSOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

sou1 1 1U

1 U1 1 1U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 1 1U

1 U1 U1 1 1U


SUSUSUSU511

U

SUSUSUSUSUSUSU5 1 1U5 1 1U5 U

HL-GW-MW-05(re)7/17/95

Re-Analysis

NAMANA

NAMANANAIV^

NANANANANANANANAKlANA

NAKlANANANANANAKlANA

NANAKlANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANAKlANn

NANANANANANANAkl ANAKlANANA

TABLE TM5-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES



HL-GW-MW-047/17/95

HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-057/17/95 7/17/95

Field Duplicate

HL-GW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95

Re-AnalysisSemlvolatlle Oraanlca fCont.l Units

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane2,4-Dichlorophenol1 ,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneNaphthalene4-ChloroanilineHexachlorobutadiene4-Chlor-3-Methylphenol2-MethylnaphthaleneHexachlorocyclopentadiene2,4,6-Trichlorophenol2,4,5-Trichlorophenol2-Chloronaphthalene2-NitroanilineDimethylphthalateAcenaphthylene2,6-Dinitrotoluene3-NitroanailineAcenaphthene2,4-Dinitrophenol4-NitrophenolDibenzofuran2,4-DinrtrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether;luorenel-Nitroanilinet,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol^-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)i-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachlorobenzene3entachlorophenol'henanthreneAnthracene^arbazole3i-n-ButylphthalateMuoranthene'yreneiutylbenzylphthalate,3'-Dichlorobenzidine)enzo(A)anthraceneIhrysenels(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate)i-n-Octylphthalate)enzo(b)Fluoranthene)enzo(k)Fluoranthene)enzo(a)Pyreneideno( 1 ,2, 3-cd)Pyrene>ibenz(a,h)Anthraceneenzo(g,h,i)Perylene

ug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U

. 5 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U5 U

20 U5 U5 U5U

20 U5 U

20 U20 U5 U5U5 U5 U5 U

20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U2 BJ5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U5 U

20 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U5 U

20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U20 U5 U5 U5 U

20 U5 U5U5 U5 U5 U5 U

0.4 J •5 U5 U5 U

0.5 BJ5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

Pl». J of 4

TABLE TMS-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES

UDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE HJULY 1995

Sampa

PwtiddW

ateha-BHCbata-BHCdtta-8HCgamma-BHC (Lindana)IteptochtorAldrintAoMMt M^^af r flMMWH^A

EndosuManlDMdrin4.4*-DOEEndrinEndosuHan II4.4--ODDEndosuKan SuMate4.4--ODT|J -ff, .,- „ -nt.| 1, -•MnODtycraorCMMI KBUMWcflonn aioanyda•teha-CMordana

lonpnanaArodoMOieftrodor-1221Arodor-1232ftrodor-1242fodor-1248

fcoctor-1254WDdor-1280

Total MataliMuminum

IfMnictariumfeyewm«aduimniXHum(hromiumUAaR''Opparran•adlagnaahmtangaiMMtarcuryidealtitaniumatonium9modwm

la Location:•note Date:

yjteugfl.u0AugA.uo/LugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

mugA.mugA.

ugA.• H«JIugn.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

yjteugA.

mugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

HL-OW4IW-047/17I9S

0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.010 U0.50 U

A A4A 1 10.010 UA A4A 1 1o.uio u0.010 UA A4fl 1 1U.U1U U

0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U

33J1A 1 I.0 Uzou

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20,900

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U60J>[]1.0 U

5^202U0-20 U20.0 U

1 00 []ZOU

0.50 UM10 [I

HL-OW4IW-04<d)7/17/95

FieW Duplicate

NA

N*t4ANANANANANANANANANANANANANA•JANAkJANA

NA•JANA

NANANANANANANANA

28.61A 1 1.0 Uzou

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20,200

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U47.0 []1.0 U

5,68021.00.20 U20.0 U

1,380 [}ZOU

0.50 U1,320 []

HL-GW-MW-057/17/95


A A4A 1 1O.QiO UA A.4A 1 IO.UIO U

0.010 UA A4fl 1 1U.Ultl U

0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U

254In i •.0 U2jB

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U21.500

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U•901 []1.0 U

5,8801780.20 U20.0 U

1.170 []ZOU

0.50 U1.340 []

HL-GW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95

Re-Analysis


0 /14 All.010 UA A4A 1 10.010 U0.010 UOfMn 1 1.010 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U0.10 U

NA•kl ANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

TABLE TM5-2 (Continued)CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR OROUNDWATER SAMPLES



Total Metali fCont.1ThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Dissolved MetalsAluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperranLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel3otassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumrhalllum/anadiumline

Unitsug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

Unitsug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

HL-GW-MW-047/17/95

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U

23.21.0 U2.0 U

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20,600

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U

5,66021.00.20 U20.0 U

1,300 []2.0 U

0.50 U1,370 []

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U

HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-057/17/95 7/17/95

Field Duplicate

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U

NA

23.71.0 U2.0 U

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20,700

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U

5,75020.00.20 U20.0 U

1,320 []2.0 U

0.50 U1,400 []

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U

21.51.0 U2.6

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20,900

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U86.0 []

1.0 U5,670

1700.20 U20.0 U

1,130 []2.0 U

0.50 U1,360 []

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U

HL-OW-MW-OS(re)7/17/95

Re-Analysis

NANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

Notes: U - Indicate* that compound was analyzed for but not detected. The sample quantftaUon limit is adjusted for dilution and percent moisture.J - Indicates an estimated concentration below the contract required detection level (CRQL) but greater than 0 or when estimating a

concentration for TICs.B - Indicates analyte was detected In both the sample and the associated laboratory method blank.[ ] - Concentration reported Is below CROL but greater than the IDL.

NA - Not analyzed.• Analytes detected are shown in bold text.

TABLE TMS-3VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOL BORMG SAMPLES

MOEQ - WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IJULY 1995

Date:HL-i

7/11JMHL-VS-C3-B

TfllJK

10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4J

1Z4-TrtcNarabram


330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U

10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U4J10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 u10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U10 U

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U

TABLE TMS-3 (Continued)VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOIL BORING SAMPLES

MDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE IIJULY 1995


SanMVolatlle Oroanlc* (Cont.lHaxachlorobutadiana4-Chtor-3-Methylphenol2-MethylnaphtnateneHexachlorocyclopentadlene2,4,6-Trichtorophenol2,4,5-Trtehlorophenol2-Chtoronaphthalene2-NltroanillneDlmethylphthalateAcenaphthytene2,6-Dlnftrotoluene3-NKroanallineAcanaphthene2,4-Dlnftrophenol4-NltrophenolDlbenzofuran2,4-DinitrotolueneDiethylphthalate4-Chlorophenyt-phenyletherFluorene4-Nttroanillnet,6-Dlnttro-2-MethylphenolN-Nttrosodiphenylarnlne (1)t-Bromophenyl-phenyletherHexachlorobenzene'entachlorophenol3henanthrena\nthraceneJartoazole31-n-Butylphthalate"luoranthene>yrenetutylbenzylphthalate

13t-Dlchlorobenzldlne

)enzo(A)anthraceneihryaenate(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate(l-n-Octytphthalateenzo(b)Fluorantheneanzo(k)Fluoranthaneenzo(a)PyreneKleno(1 ,2,3-cd)Pyrenelbenz(a,h)Anthraceneenzo(g,h,l)Perylene

PMticldeaIpha-BHCata-BHCelta-BHCamma-BHC (Llndane)eptachlorIdrineptachlor epoxldendosulfan 1leldrin

Uniteug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

"8*8ug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kgug/kg

Uniteug/kg

"8*8ug/kg

"8*8ug/kg

"8*9ug/kgug/kgug/kg

HL-SS-B6-J7/11/95

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 UJ330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 UJ

1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U

HL-VS-C3-B7/11/95

330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U800 U800 U330 U330 U330 U800 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 U330 UJ330 UJ330 UJ330 U330 U330 U330 UJ

1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U1.7 U3.3 U

VAUDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR SOL BOMNG SAMPLESMOEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE I

JULY 1995

7/11195HL-VS-C3-B

7/11WS

4.4-OOE.

UP*

3JU33U3JU3JU3-3U3-3U17 U3JU3JU1.7 U1.7 U170 U33 U67 U33U33U33 U33U33 U

O04UftMMJ024U

U

IJ

MJo.tau

§.11J0.02 UttJJ0.04 U

aosu

13 U3JU3JU3u3U13 U33U17 U3JUUU1.7 U1.7 U170 U33U67 U33 U33U33U33U33 U

OJ04U

024 U

OJB6U

•n1&4aosu

«7JCtt JO02U174 JO04U

M2JOJ6U

iMbi

TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES



Volatile OrganlcsChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene chlorideAcetoneCarbon disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethene (total)Chloroform1,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone (MEK)1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 ,1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenerans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneJromoform4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 ,1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneDhlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyrene(ylene (total)

Semlvojatila Oroanlcashenol)is(2-Chloroethyl)Ether'-Chlorophenol,3-Dichlorobenzene,4-Dichlorobenzene,2-Dichlorobenzene

'-Methylphenol> ,2'-oxybis(1 -Chloropropane)l-MethylphenolJ-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine•foxachloroethaneNitrobenzenesophorone'-Nitrophenol!,4-Dimethylphenol

IMSug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

Uniteug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/Lug/L

HL-GW-MW-047/17/95

1 U1 U1 U1 U2 U

50 UJSOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U


5U5U5U5U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U

HL-GW-MW-04(d)7/17/95


NANANANANANANANANANANA,NANANANA

HL-GW-MW-057/17/95

1 U1 U1 U1 U2U

50 UJ50 U

1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

SOU1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U

sousou1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U3 U

5U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U5 U5U

95I2WIXLS/MMJ2/H15-OO PIT I of 4

TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES '

MDEQ -WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE DJULY 1995

SamptoSm

^ • •_-»•- /"Ww»^«»l*»^ it*****j pumMMMi %Jt ^npj» IWDII

1 Z4-Tric«orobenzene

4-Chkman.ne

ZHMQViyvispwiflioooj 1 • i i ii iilil n fin !• irJn •» n gJ«a rCi*j» m

2.4.6-TncfBoropnenol2.4 -TricMcmphenol

2£OMrotohwne

ALenapnmeoc2,4-OrtrophenolM h bHMkl»AMM*l4-NrapnenoiWMM|||ABIB|

^ liln nn nh m nt J M§kM*M^ I* »4-cnHropn0nyi pnenynowrFknraneM &DkM» M 9Mk«i_4-MnMnmt^ A ^ »abM *% ttmMm lii •••nl•.(MJrao- -Maviy jiranai

WIHMVMW

•% - ^^^^^J^K>nmoiBDNvBuMpMhaWe

IWM^ k » MMk«bJdlk l ^xATymwnzy inanvMX7-OicMorabenziifne

CtayMne

M-n-OctripMhaMe96nzoib|rluoranneneMnzo(R)rluonnnene3anzo(a)Pyrenendano(1 3<d)Pyrane

)onzo(g,h.i)Perytene

I 11 n •llnaiLocmon.

U Unta

ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

ugA.ugA.

HL-GW-MW-047/17/95

5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U

R20 U5U

20 U5U5U5U

20 U5U

20 U20 U5U5U5U5U5U

20 U20 U5U5U5U

20 U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5UJ5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U

HL-GW-MW-04<d)7/17/95

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA QNANANANANANANANANANANA

HL-GW-MW-057/17/95

5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U

R20 U5U

20 U5U5U5U

20 U5U

20 U20 U5U5U5U5U5U

20 U20 U5U5U5U

20 U5U5U5U5U5U5U

(L4J |5UJ5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U5U

TABLE TM5-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES


Sample Location: HL-GW-MW-04 HL-GW-MW-04(d) HL-GW-MW-05Sample Date: 7/17/95 7/17/95 7/17/95

Pesticidesalpha-BHCbeta-BHCdelta-BHCgamma-BHC (Lindane)HeptachlorAldrinHeptachlor epoxideEndosulfan IDieldrin4,4'-DDEEndrinEndosulfan II4,4'-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate4,4'-DDTMethoxychlorEndrin ketoneEndrin aldehydealpha-Chlordanejamma-ChlordaneToxaphenefcroclor-1016Aroclor-1221<Vroclor-1232Hroclor-1242(\roclor-1248"Vroclor-1254\roclor-1260

Total MetalsMuminum\ntimony\rsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumDobaltHopperron.eadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickel'otassiumSeleniumSilverSodium

Uniteug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.50 U NA 0.50 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.010 U NA 0.010 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 Uug/L 0.10 U NA 0.10 U

Unitsug/L 33.8 1 28.6J 25.6Jug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Uug/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.*6lug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 5.0 U 5.0 U 5.0 Uug/L 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 Uug/L 20,900 J 20,200 J 21,500 J |ug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 60.0 J 47.0 J 93.0 Jug/L 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 Uug/L 5,820 J 5,680 J 5,860 Jug/L 22.0 J 21.0 J 178 Jug/L 0.20 U 0.20 U 0.20 Uug/L 20.0 U 20.0 U 20.0 Uug/L 1,400 J 1,380 J 1,170 Jug/L 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 Uug/L 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 Uug/L 1,410 J 1,320 J 1,340 J

93I20SI.XLS/MI422/II13-00

TABLE TMS-4 (Continued)VALIDATED CLP LABORATORY RESULTS FOR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES

• WASTE MANAGEMENT - HOLLAND LAGOONS - PHASE aJULY 1995

ToMMrtThefcumVanedumZincCyanide

DMBOtaAluminumAiaiiMMiyAraaracBariumBefyBumCadmiumCalciumCtwomunCobalCopperIranLead

MercuryWokel

SetariumSeVerSodumThalumVanadunOne

Note*: U-MJ-Etf

UJ-Oui

R-ta

Sample Locaflon:

tMifTTimn "•*•ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

•dJMaM UnjtiugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.ugA.

HL-GW4MMM7/17/95

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U5.0 U

2X2|1.0 U2.0 U

20.0 U5.0 U

0.10 U20.SOO J

20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U20.0 U1.0 U

5JCO J214IJ0^0 U20.0 U

1 00 Jzou

0^0 U1470 J

1.0 U20.0 U20.0 U

SMlH tHt OORvpOUnd MS •YHflyXBd faf but HOl OBtKlBd. IT

HL-GW4MMM(d) HL-GW-MW457/17/95 7/17/95

1.0 U 1.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 UNA 5.0 U

23.7J | 21.5J1.0 U 1.0 U2.0 U | 2JB\

20.0 U 20.0 U5.0 U 5.0 U

0.10 U 0.10 U20,700 J | 20JOO J

20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U | MJO J1.0 U 1.0 U

5,750 J 1 5,670 J20.0 J I 170 J0.20 U 0.20 U20.0 U 20.0 U

1.320 J | 1.130 J2.0 U 2.0 U

0.50 U 0.50 U1,400 J | 1.360 J

1.0 U 1.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U20.0 U 20.0 U

• Mvnplv puBnttatton bral m •opuilBd ivdeiUeion end pMjcint fnoeVtuTv.

VM ww not met.

letter: transmittal of technical memorandum no. 1 …

Documents